Microplastics Found In SEMEN And Female Reproductive Fluid

Microplastics are now present practically everywhere on Earth, from the Mariana Trench’s depths to the top of Everest.

Now, it turns out even our most intimate moments can’t escape their blight.

Scientists have found microplastics are ‘common’ in both male and female reproductive fluids.

Additionally, they cautioned that the quality of the sperm and eggs may be compromised, which might have consequences for reproduction.

The team studied follicular fluid – seen within the ovaries – from 29 women and the seminal fluid, seen within semen, from 22 men.

Analysis showed that over half of the samples contained a variety of widely used microplastics.

Among these were microplastics connected to wool, polystyrene, plastic containers, non-stick coatings, insulation, and cushioning materials.

Lead researcher Dr Emilio Gomez-Sanchez, from the University of Murcia, said: ‘Previous studies had already shown that microplastics can be found in various human organs.

‘As a result, we weren’t entirely surprised to find microplastics in fluids of the human reproductive system, but we were struck by how common they were – found in 69 per cent of the women and 55 per cent of the men we studied.’

Microplastics are defined as plastic particles under 5mm in size, and there is evidence that they pose a threat to environmental and public health.

Although the researchers did not explicitly evaluate the impact of microplastics on fertility, their identification underscores the necessity of investigating potential consequences for human reproductive health, they cautioned.

‘What we know from animal studies is that in the tissues where microplastics accumulate, they can induce inflammation, free radical formation, DNA damage, cellular senescence, and endocrine disruptions,’ Dr Gomez-Sanchez added.

‘It’s possible they could impair egg or sperm quality in humans, but we don’t yet have enough evidence to confirm that.’

The scientists said the microplastics probably enter the body through ingestion, inhalation and contact with the skin.

From there, they enter the bloodstream, which distributes them throughout the body, including the reproductive organs.

To investigate the possible connection between the quality of eggs and sperm and the presence of microplastics, they want to conduct more research.

The results, published in the journal Human Reproduction, were shown at the annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).

Commenting on the study Dr Carlos Calhaz-Jorge, Immediate Past Chair of ESHRE, said: ‘Environmental factors influencing reproduction are certainly a reality, although not easy to measure objectively.

‘The authors of this study found microplastics in over two-thirds of follicular fluids and more than 50 per cent of semen fluids from the studied patients.

‘Although the significance of these findings is not yet clear, they should be considered an additional argument in favour of avoiding the generalised use of plastics in our daily lives.’

Microplastics have been found in human breast milk, blood, and even brain tissue in earlier investigations, and separate research has discovered high levels in everyday items such as tea bags, baby bottles and chopping boards.

Some scientists have urged caution when interpreting the findings of the new study. 

Dr Stephanie Wright, Associate Professor in Environmental Toxicology at Imperial College London, said: ‘Without information on the sizes of the microplastic particles observed, it is challenging to interpret how meaningful this data is.

‘There is a high potential for samples to become contaminated with microplastic throughout the sampling, laboratory processing, and analysis procedures. 

‘It is not a surprise that microplastics have been found – they are everywhere, even in the lab – but the data provided do not support that they are there as a result of human exposure as opposed to methodological artefact and must be interpreted with caution at this early stage.’

Fay Couceiro, Professor of Environmental Pollution and Head of the Microplastics Research Group at the University of Portsmouth said: ‘The study is very interesting and considering the global reduction in fertility rates, looking at possible causes is very topical and timely. 

‘As the authors state, finding microplastics is not that surprising as we have found them in lots of other areas of our bodies.

‘Presence is also not the same as impact and the authors are clear that while they have found microplastics in the reproductive fluids of both men and women, we still don’t know how they are affecting us.’

Some individuals could believe that an image like this is what’s floating around in their body, therefore I wish they would stop using it. They are only visible under a microscope and are microplastics, not large pieces. Microplastics are bad and shouldn’t be in our bodies.

Now even people’s reproductive systems are sponsored by Tupperware.

Twenty odd years ago they said that plastic was suitable for the environment and that it was recyclable, and like everything else, now it’s harmful to the environment and to our bodies.

A substantial intake of plastic comes from microwaving food, and plastic water bottles that we allow to sit in the sun and the toxins leech into the bottle of whatever drink we are consuming, but we still microwave our food without another thought and leave plastic bottles in the sunlight.

But how many kids chewed on their biro pens in school or even when you worked in an office, and for how long has that been going on, but nobody said anything about that.

What makes me chuckle is that we were told that plastic shopping bags were bad for the environment so they would put a levy on them, but they still sell them. I thought the idea was to do away with them so that they did not harm the environment. That was a great money-making scheme and people just went along with it.

If something is dangerous to the environment then just get rid of it!

The ‘Bank of Wokeness’ Will Ditch Historical Figures

The Bank of England has been accused of ‘wrongheaded wokery’ after announcing it could drop historical figures from banknotes to reflect modern diversity.

It has launched a consultation seeking suggestions from the public that could mean the end of using pictures of important characters – Sir Winston Churchill, Jane Austen, artist JMW Turner and code-breaker Alan Turing presently appear.

The Bank suggests that modern issues such as gender, ethnicity and disability could be taken into account when planning the designs, with chief cashier Victoria Cleland saying: ‘It may be that we can get that real diversity through a different theme than historic figures.’

But the plans to change the traditional appearance of banknotes – which began in 1970 with William Shakespeare – drew a quick backlash.

Former business secretary Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg said: ‘The Bank of Wokeness wants to ignore our history and heroes to model itself on the unutterable banality of euro notes. It shows a lack of confidence in the nation and a supine kowtowing to the gods of political correctness.’

Kevin Hollinrake, a former business minister, said: ‘This is wrongheaded wokery. We should be proud of our history, not sideline it. 

‘Replacing historical figures with abstract themes risks erasing the rich, complex story of how our country has evolved. Diversity is incredibly important, but we should achieve it by widening the range of historic figures we honour, not by abandoning them altogether.’

The month-long consultation, the Bank said, will give the public ‘the opportunity to express their views on what theme they would like us to feature on the next series of our banknotes’.

The Bank has not said when the new set of notes will be issued, but it identified six ‘potential themes’, although people who are still alive – other than the monarch – would be excluded.

The Angel of the North, windfarms, and the DNA double helix are shown in a mock-up series of drawings that were released concurrently with the consultation launch.

The final decision will be for the governor, to rule out mischievous ideas such as ‘Boaty McBoatface’ which was selected by the public as the name of a new UK polar research ship, which ultimately became the Sir David Attenborough.

Ms Cleland said ideas for the designs needed to be ‘representative of the UK’ but also ‘not to be divisive’ or ‘upset people’.

Campaigners had complained of a lack of women on notes before the Jane Austen’s addition in 2017.

I’m sick to the back teeth of hearing about diversity and inclusion. Of course, there should be some diversity and inclusion, but not to the point it becomes ridiculous, especially in the history of mankind. You cannot eradicate the history of mankind because if you start doing that, you may as well say that wars did not exist and that Jews did not die in concentration camps, which we know that they did. When we start eliminating history, then we may as well eliminate mankind – or is this the whole concept?

What it boils down to is that the UK is being ethnically cleansed.

Government needs to remember that during World War I and World War II, people fought for the UK, so they need to remember that is why they are here today. Our British heroes and heroines made a sacrifice for this country, if they had not, people in government would not be sitting in their gilded castles drinking wine and smoking cigars. They should be thankful, not traitors to their country.

Churchill himself said, “A country that forgets its past, has no future.”

Amazon’s Robots Will Soon Outnumber Humans

Soon, there will be more robots than people working in Amazon’s warehouses.

The massive retailer has long been automating jobs that were formerly done by people.

As a consequence, according to the company’s own data, it now has more than one million robots in its workplaces.

This new record is very close to surpassing the number of human workers at its facilities.

Amazon’s huge warehouses are now staffed with extensive plucking ‘robots’ with long metallic arms that can pick up and move packages. 

Additional robots assist with sorting and putting goods into packaging.

One of the newest robots, called Vulcan, even has an in-built sense of touch which helps it to distinguish between different items on shelves, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Amazon’s latest move is to connect the robots to its order-fulfilment systems – meaning the machines can work together and with humans to complete jobs – according to the report. 

‘They’re one step closer to that realization of the full integration of robotics,’ robot analyst Rueben Scriven told the Journal. 

Presently, about 75 per cent of Amazon’s deliveries are helped by a robot at some point on their journey.

Amazon claims this has been one of the main factors behind their improved productivity.

It also helps solve issues such as high staff turnover at its fulfilment centres, the retail giant said.

Additionally, it has relieved present employees of some tedious and laborious duties like heavy lifting.

‘I thought I was going to be doing heavy lifting, I thought I was going to be walking like crazy,’ Amazon employee Neisha Cruz told the Journal.

Cruz was trained to supervise the new robotic systems after working for five years as an item picker at an Amazon warehouse in Windsor, Connecticut.

Cruz can now work behind a computer instead of on her feet and makes more than twice as much money as she did when she first started.

However, the robots are also replacing jobs and delaying hiring at the company which presently utilises 1.56 million people, mainly in warehouses.

It comes after Amazon’s CEO Andy Jassy recently revealed that the increased implementation of AI means the company will slash the size of its workforce in the coming years.  

‘​​As we roll out more Generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done,’ Jassy wrote in a memo to staff last month.

‘It’s hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce,’ he explained. 

And Amazon is not alone.

Last month Microsoft also said is planning to cut thousands of jobs as it ramps up investments in AI. 

The cuts, which will hit sales roles in particular, are part of a broader effort to streamline the company’s workforce, according to Bloomberg.

The layoffs are expected to be announced early next month, following the end of the tech giant’s fiscal year, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter. 

In June Procter & Gamble, which makes diapers, laundry detergent, and other household items, also revealed it would cut 7,000 jobs, or about 15 per cent of non-manufacturing roles.   

Concern over how AI will affect the labour economy is rising among Americans.

The tech is continuing to upend the jobs market with white collar entry-level jobs vanishing quickly and layoffs in tech, finance and consulting gathering pace.

Automation is increasing at a rapid pace. Some might see this as a good thing but if people don’t have a job, how are they going to pay for their goods? No jobs, no money!

It seems that ‘Terminator’ wasn’t just a movie, it was a documentary for the future.

Life has become depressing. You would go out and the shops and stores were heaving with people, now you go out and most of the shops and stores have closed down, it’s all extremely sad. Where has everyone gone? No wonder there are so many people who are unemployed.

We were forewarned years ago about this and now our jobs are in jeopardy. People would now be better off training in technical training on robot training and maintenance, that way we stay ahead of the curve.

Listen and understand. Robots are here – they can’t be bargained with, and they can’t be reasoned with. They don’t feel pity, remorse, or fear, and it won’t stop until you are unemployed!

Minister Questioned On PIP Welfare U-Turn – ‘How On Earth Did It Get To This Point’

After a tough week for the prime minister, a government minister was questioned about Keir Starmer’s reversal on disability benefit reduction.

After the government was obliged to make significant concessions last week to prevent a humiliating Commons loss, Baroness Jacqui Smith, the minister of skills, was under pressure.

In a dramatic climbdown on Thursday, the PM agreed to protect all existing claimants from losing Personal Independence Payments. The changes to PIP will now apply only to new claims from November 2026.

But Mr Starmer is still facing a mutiny at tomorrow’s crunch vote, with as many as 50-60 Labour MPs still said to be contemplating voting against the government. It would be the biggest rebellion of Mr Starmer’s premiership so far.

Appearing on BBC Breakfast, Baroness Smith was told: “It’s quite a bruising week for the government. Looking at it now, how on earth did it get to this point?” The ex-Home Secretary replied: “What I think is important is what we’re going to be starting tomorrow is really important reform of a broken welfare system.

“Welfare reform is always difficult and I think actually the engagement that’s happened with Labour MPs, who are rightly bringing the concerns of their constituents about how this reform is going to work, have made this legislation better.”

Baroness Smith also said she hoped that Labour MPs will “feel able to support” the government at tomorrow’s crunch vote after the concessions announced last week. The minister also suggested it was not “constructive” to discuss potential punishments for MPs who may decide to rebel against Mr Starmer’s welfare plans.

Asked on Sky News what the consequences should be for Labour MPs who vote against the government on the matter, she said: “I don’t think talking about punishments, even as a former chief whip, is the constructive way forward here.”

She later added: “It’s always the case in legislation that you introduce the Bill, you have a second reading on the principles, and then you think about the details as you take that through all of its stages in Parliament. I’m sure that that will continue to happen.”

But speaking on Monday the Labour MP Clive Efford said he still will not support the welfare bill even after the Government made concessions. He told the Today Programme on BBC Radio 4: “I think there are a lot of people waiting to hear what the Government is saying today who may be inclined to accept what the Government has done.

“For me, the situation hasn’t changed for those people who will be adversely affected and until we know and understand the impact on them, we shouldn’t be taking what I think is a leap in the dark.”

He added: “There are choices that the Government can make here; there are other places it can go to identify the resources. What we want to see, and fully support, is measures the Government is putting in the palace to assist people to move into work, the right to try, we support, but we can’t guarantee the savings.

“When you’re asking for £3.5 billion regardless of the impact of those changes that can only adversely affect people who are in the benefit system. We cannot make assumptions about how much we can save in the welfare system ahead of actually bringing in those changes and seeing how they work.”

Plans for a major review of PIP will also be set out, which will be co-produced by disabled people, organisations who represent them and MPs. It is expected that the terms of the review – which will place disabled people at the heart of it – will persuade nervous MPs that the legislation is now steering in the right path.

It got to this point because Starmer was so terrified of a party with five MPs that he felt the need to show everyone how formidable he was by targeting the elderly and disabled.

If you listen to the right whingers who usually have no clue what they’re talking about, you would assume that everyone was gaming the system, when in fact welfare fraud is minuscule.

They are stating that PIP for old claimants will not change, but will it change when we have to be reassessed, and will it be tagged as a new claim?

What Keir Starmer is doing is so immoral and the people of Britain will never forget. He is a turncoat to his own people, pure and simple.

Tax the wealthy, including Keir Starmer and his comrades. Claw back that money. Why should these reprobates be entitled to have champagne lunches while the poor, elderly and disabled of this country suffer?

The Tories have been throwing our taxes around like confetti. Dido Harding for one got £37 million for a failed track and trace app, and then there’s Michelle Mone who did runner with our money.

Dementia-Stricken Pensioner Was Flogged By Cruel Carer

Astonishing CCTV footage has revealed a carer ‘violently degrading’ a frail elderly man with dementia – as she hurled him around ‘like a rag doll’ just days before he passed away.

Cruel Bilikesu Olagunju, 42, who had been in the job just six days, was captured on camera ‘manhandling’ John Attard, 88, at his home in Bexley, Kent, a court heard.

Footage captured during the 45-minute visit reveals the ordeal from which the great-grandfather never recovered, according to his family.

Olagunju, who at the time was employed by Unique Personnel UK, stripped Mr Attard, threatened to beat him up and even dragged him across his living room floor.

She is also said to have ignored the elderly man as he repeatedly told her she was ‘hurting’ him.

At one point, Olagunju tells him: ‘Maybe I will beat you up. I will flog you. I will take you to the GP to get injections. I will call the police on you.’

The distressing images were filmed in the victim’s home on Christmas Eve 2022 on a camera set up by his son Chris.

The following day, Mr Attard was discovered unresponsive – with blood dripping down the side of his face.

The pensioner was rushed to hospital, where he remained unresponsive, and passed away ten days after the incident.

Olagunju pleaded guilty to one count of ill-treating or willfully neglecting an individual while working as a care worker.

She has now been given a six-week prison sentence, suspended for 18 months, while also being ordered to carry out 50 hours’ unpaid work, at Woolwich Crown Court in south-east London.

Speaking after the hearing, the victim’s son Chris Attard condemned her sentence as an ‘insult’.

He said that although a post-mortem could not prove it, he felt Olagunju’s actions had directly contributed to his father’s sudden decline and death.

He said: ‘If those cameras had not been there, that person could still be out there treating elderly people like this.

‘I was expecting a suspended sentence, but the length and community service aspect is an insult. What kind of a deterrent is that?’

The court obtained a breakdown of the CCTV footage, starting with Olagunju arriving at 11.20 am with the job of washing Mr Attard and making him breakfast.

After shouting at him to stand, he slips on the floor and as she struggles to dress him, she is seen stripping him in front of a window in full view of the street.

The carer is also shown dragging him by the arm and scruff of his collar across the floor and ‘yanking’ him up, causing ‘great distress’, the court was informed.

At one point, the defendant was heard calling her employer to explain that Mr Attard was on the floor and was instructed not to touch him and to call an ambulance.

The defendant ignores this request, and instead continued to haul him up herself while complaining ‘a man’ should have been sent to do the job.

She is also seen in the footage mocking Mr Attard by pouring marmalade into his coffee despite knowing he was diabetic and threatening to ‘flog’ him.

Chris Attard said he was horrified by how visibly distressed his father looked throughout, describing his face as ‘distorted’ while being ‘manhandled.’

He added: ‘She is physically trying to lift him like a rag doll. His face indicates the discomfort and pain he is feeling.

‘She lifts him off the floor, dragging him toward his armchair. He tells her: “My head is banging.”

The carer is heard on the footage saying to Mr Attard: ‘Me, I’ll flog you, flog you’, later adding: ‘Maybe I’ll beat you up. I’ll flog you. Take you to hospital, take you to GP to give injections and police.’

She is repeatedly told by Mr Attard throughout: ‘You are hurting me’.

The footage demonstrates her making breakfast while continuing to threaten violence and picking up a plastic marmalade sachet, squeezing its contents into his coffee.

She also pulls his table away, making it difficult for Mr Attard to reach any of the food – and spilling hot coffee on him in the process.

As she leaves the house, she tells him: ‘Bye – I will report you to the police.’

At Olagunju’s sentencing hearing, prosecutor James Benson said her conduct towards Mr Attard had taken multiple forms including ‘rough handling, verbal aggression, and degrading treatment’.

He described her actions as ‘brusque, inappropriate, and uncaring’ and said she ‘played on her victim’s vulnerability’.

The victim’s son Chris Attard broke down in tears as he delivered a statement to the court, saying: ‘The autopsy could not conclusively prove the carer was responsible – but the autopsy showed he had bruising on the left side of his chest.’

‘It was Christmas morning when I found my 88-year-old father unresponsive in bed. He was rushed to hospital and his room was declared a crime scene.

‘This was the morning after he was physically and verbally assaulted by the very person entrusted to care for him.

‘Three days after he was admitted to hospital I wrote a victim impact statement. My last words read: “I am yet to discover the long-term effect this may have on my dad and his physical and mental welfare.”

‘Well, now I know – he never recovered and died seven days later in hospital.’

Addressing Olagunju directly, he said: ‘An autopsy could not link your actions to his death – but I feel personally that your actions, in part, contributed to his sudden death.’

Chris described his father, who had five children, 11 grandchildren and seven great-grandchildren, as ‘kind-hearted, generous, compassionate, and funny’, adding: ‘He was still enjoying what life he had left.’

The distraught son said that re-watching the harrowing CCTV footage for the purpose of the case had had a profound impact on him, and his family.

He said: ‘For a very long time I was unable to get a full night’s sleep due to dissecting the CCTV over and over again in my head.

‘I constantly thought about the fear he must have felt – the indignity of being dragged around and then yanked up off the floor and unceremoniously thrown back onto his chair.

‘That must have been very distressing for him.’

Addressing Olagunju, Chris continued: ‘When all of this becomes a distant memory for you, our pain will still be here.

‘You can never ever take back the memories you left my father with at the end of his life, and the memories you have now left us with, for the rest of our lives.

‘If you find it hard to understand how I feel, then just imagine it was me assaulting your loved one on that CCTV, and I’m the one standing where you are now – what sentence would you like this court to give me?’

John was Olagunju’s first assignment as a care worker in the UK.

During sentencing, Judge Charlotte Welsh told her: ‘Frankly it beggars belief that someone would be allocated an elderly man with dementia as their first client.

‘Being a carer is a very, very difficult job and frankly, people don’t appreciate it until they need it. I am convinced that you had not received the sufficient training.’

She added: ‘Your actions are evident of your failure to treat Mr Attard as a person deserving of as much dignity and respect as the rest of us.

‘I accept that there was no malicious intent to your actions and you show genuine remorse. But none of this will help Mr Attard’s family.

‘They have lost a father, grandfather, and great-grandfather, and their memories of him are now tainted by what they have seen on the CCTV footage – and the way you behaved towards him.’

Olagunju, of Abbey Wood, wearing a light blue satin shirt and jeans, wept silently during the emotional statement.

Her defence barrister Mr Tijani said she accepted full responsibility for her conduct – and was ‘ashamed’ of how she had acted.

He continued: ‘She accepts that she failed in her duty as a carer. She has been suffering from mental anguish as a result of this incident and has instructed me to tell the family she is very sorry.’

In mitigation, Mr Tijani said Olagunju had no previous convictions and that Mr Attard had been her first patient after she arrived in the UK from abroad to be a carer.

He added: ‘On the CCTV, you can see a woman who was not trained properly to deal with the situation she was faced with.’

Speaking after the case, Chris Attard said: ‘From now on that woman is out of my head, and my mission is to expose this company – Unique Personnel.

‘They should have been in the dock alongside [Olagunju]. Had they done their due diligence she never would have been sent near an elderly person.

‘This is a care company sending people to the homes of elderly and vulnerable people and putting them at risk of harm.

‘I want to speak about that so this doesn’t happen to anyone else. They tried to excuse it by saying she had only been there six days. But where were the checks and the training?’

The company has been contacted for comment.

This conduct is abhorrent. It was evident from the video that she mistreated the man. She should have been given a much lengthier prison sentence and then deported as she had only just arrived in the UK.

This presents the most significant problem in our modern care industry – most of the ‘carers’ just don’t care.

I just can’t fathom how the judge said he hadn’t acted with malicious intent. She was a woman who was a heartless and vicious human being, and evidently, she cried in court, what were they, crocodile tears?

As for Unique Personnel, there were no inspection reports or ratings for this provider overall. However, I did manage to get some reviews online for them, with some saying that there had been some good carers but they also had some diabolical ones as well. That the staff had been difficult to liaise with. That their communication was appalling, and that they did not take clients’ needs seriously enough and failed to handle complaints with respect and efficiency.

This company was not recommended, and it said that their staff needed to become more person and client-centred as well as understanding and compassionate.

When this woman was given the position of a carer, the word ‘carer’ clearly got lost in translation.

I’m not sure what the judge was thinking or how the judge constitutes malicious intent. Did the judge believe that this was normal to treat an elderly person or any elderly person like this when you’re supposed to be caring for them?

There are numerous situations like this, and I would definitely not want to be cared for by a foreigner. These individuals clearly have different standards.

The judge said he accepted this woman had not had enough training. You don’t require training to be a kind and compassionate person. She was neither.

Third-world people imported – third-world behaviours. It’s hardly rocket science to work it out.

All of this makes me feel physically sick and resentful at what this poor proud man had to experience at the hands of this disgusting person.

Of course, we need people to work in our country, but what we don’t need are low lives who think they’re entitled to come to this country with what seems to be ‘pure hatred’ for our people.

This man’s last days on this earth were spent dying. These elderly people are frail and delicate and some are in a lot of discomfort. Intentional cruelty is out there visiting our loved ones and seemingly caring for them.

Dirty Dishes In The Sink

Spoiled and slothful age groups (Gen Z) are the worst for leaving soiled dishes festering in the sink.

Nearly a quarter (22 per cent) of those aged 16 to 26 said they leave the washing-up piling up for three nights before taking action.

That compares with just 13 per cent of millennials aged 27 to 42 who said they leave dirty dishes that long, 9 per cent of Generation X (43 to 58), and just 3 per cent of Baby Boomers, aged 59 and over.

Men are twice as likely to let the dishes fester, with 13 per cent leaving them for three nights compared with just 7 per cent of women. 

Across the board, 40 per cent of people do the dishes immediately, whereas a squalid one in 100 will leave them for a week or more.

Geographically, Sheffield residents are the worst at washing up, with 43 per cent saying they leave dishes overnight, followed by Plymouth (41 per cent), Cardiff (37 per cent), and Leeds and Birmingham (36 per cent each).

Cleaning brand Astonish surveyed 2,001 adults for the poll.

Spokesman Nick Moss said: ‘Leaving dirty dishes in the sink overnight isn’t ideal – it can be unhygienic. 

‘But a third of people don’t seem to have any qualms about it.

‘Less than half do them straight away, which is surprisingly low.’

The poll also discovered that a third of people cleaned under the sofa just once a month or less.

I couldn’t stand to see and smell filthy dishes in the morning. I bet the next Gen Z will be using paper plates as no doubt they are more ecofriendly than washing?

This generation has been offered everything—pardon the pun—on a platter. They frequently complain about being taken advantage of, putting little work into everything, yet anticipating a higher payoff and return.

From what I have seen these Gen Z appear to be the most entitled pampered group – I wouldn’t be surprised if they don’t ask YouTube how to wash the dishes, and these Z’s have morphed into slothful incompetents and I’m guessing that social media is responsible.

The future of the Right is being shaped … in London’s most exclusive clubs

The future of Right-wing politics in Britain is being decided on the cigar terraces of Mayfair. As the opinion poll surge of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK shakes the foundations of the Conservatives, power-brokers from both parties are cutting deals and war-gaming defections on adjoining tables in the capital’s most salubrious salons.

The Tories have been defined as the most thriving political party globally, on the back of 200 years of near-electoral power. But if leader Kemi Badenoch will maintain that standing until the next election, it will need a resurgence of Lazarus-like dimensions.

According to a YouGov poll last week, Mr Farage would win 271 seats if an election were held now – well ahead of Labour on 178. The Conservatives would follow the Liberal Democrats on a sad seat of merely 48 seats.

It has led to long, dark nights of the soul for Tory grandees and donors: do they stick with the Conservatives, even if they are sleepwalking to electoral doom? Do they try to form a pact with Mr Farage? Or do they simply jump ship entirely?

The result has been a string of lunches and dinners in ultra-exclusive clubs such as 5 Hertford Street and its sister establishment Oswald’s, both owned by entrepreneur Robin Birley.

Oswald’s, which is frequented by the likes of the Prince of Wales, Tony Blair, Boris Johnson and the Beckhams, was the venue for a dazzling £1 million fundraising event for Reform earlier this year.

And on a single day this month, the same lunch service at Oswald’s boasted former prime minister David Cameron, his ex-chancellor George Osborne and Tory leadership hopeful Robert Jenrick all dining together, next to Mr Farage and his treasurer Nick Candy in an in-depth conversation on a nearby table – and with former Tory Cabinet minister Jacob Rees-Mogg, who has advised the two parties to form a pact, delivering salutations from a third table.

In the same week, a short stroll across Berkley Square at 5 Hertford Street, popular with Eurocrats and celebrities such as Hugh Grant, a single lunch sitting offered the spectacle of billionaire Michael Spencer, Lord Cameron’s former treasurer, dining with Francis Maude, an ex-Tory chairman, under the sharp eyes of Mr Farage’s inner circle, including Arron Banks and Andy Wigmore – the self-styled ‘bad boys of Brexit’ who helped finance Mr Farage’s Brexit campaign in the 2016 referendum – and Mr Farage’s mysterious fixer, ‘Posh’ George Cottrell.

As the wine flowed – full-bodied red for the Tories, chablis for the Faragistes – it represented a neat microcosm of the shifting tectonic plates: Lord Maude – tipped to return to the chairman role – is understood to have been lobbying Lord Spencer for funds for the party, while the Faragistes were drawing up a list of Tory donors to target for defection.

At the centre of this Venn diagram of plotting is Mr Jenrick, who is more open than Mrs Badenoch to cutting a deal with Reform – and is said to have received Lord Cameron’s support to succeed her as leader.

Meanwhile, at The In & Out private members’ club, a more traditional Armed Forces venue situated at the other end of Piccadilly, allies of Mr Farage and Mr Jenrick have met for casual conversations about ‘uniting the Right’. Conspirators have even floated the notion of Mr Jenrick serving as chancellor in a Farage administration, although both sides furiously deny any such plans.

Mr Jenrick has also lunched at 5 Hertford Street with Rupert Lowe, the Great Yarmouth MP who lost the Reform whip after a sensational bust-up with Mr Farage.

Even many moderate Conservatives, facing the loss of their seats, are now contemplating a merger.

One member of the Leftish One Nation group said: ‘A pact with Reform is inevitable now.’

The MP added: ‘There should be a non-aggression pact where we agree to not stand in the five seats Reform already have, and we let Nigel take his pick of seats where he is coming second to Labour. And Reform would stand down in seats we are more likely to win.

‘It would end up giving them the North to save the Home Counties.’

An insider said Tory leader Mrs Badenoch ‘would not be able to do the deal’ but added that the timing had to be right for her successor to do so.

The source said: ‘At the moment there no point doing any type of deal because Reform is on a high. Labour has imploded too early – all the benefit is going to Reform. Kemi isn’t nimble enough to capitalise on it.’

Mrs Badenoch is continuing to follow a ‘slow and steady’ approach and regularly talks to Lord Maude. ‘He tells her to be patient and give the public the chance to come around,’ the source said.

Even Mrs Badenoch’s most vociferous critics say a leadership challenge is unlikely in the near future. Says one: ‘She’s 99 per cent safe until May.

‘No one will want to own the next disaster – and there are a number coming down the line.’

All of Reform is made up of ex-Tories and we have seen what they have done to this country. They’re all clueless and couldn’t run a bath. The most alarming is that Reform is the Tory rejects.

The Tories have had their chance and have made the UK unrecognisable, but I don’t think that Remain will be any better, so who are we left with?

I grew up learning that you should protect your own, education was a privilege, hard workers were respected, the wealthy were looked up to and they frequently supported the community. We were respectful, we never littered, knife crime was almost non-existent and everyone knew everyone else, and we would help each other, all of this has gone!

Looking from a distance now – the time for the UK to get together with minor reforms is gone. We need a revolution or some kind of miracle!

It’s simple, the British people don’t want immigration – now entire towns and cities are foreign and we want our country back, and our government need to fix it or there will be civil war!

Personally, I couldn’t care less where they hold the meetings, it could be McDonald’s or the Savoy, as long as something changes for the better.

We are being told to vote for Reform, but they all say the same things just so that they can get elected. We have not produced anyone who will get things done for the people, and these talks that they have are about seizing control, not how to help the people.

Nothing has changed and nothing will if we keep giving power to people who are addicted to it. We need public servants who will put the country first, instead of thinking about how they can profit from it, their image and their bank account.

I will vote for a party that bans illegal immigrants, builds more prisons, gives offenders proper sentences, and gets rid of the Honours system.

Scrap overseas aid, and make MPs work full-time. We want more police walking out streets. Get rid of the Mayor of London, get rid of net zero, ban electric cars. I could go on and on, but we need to make Britain great again and our government should stop licking other countries bottoms.

Whatever party gets in, they will conspire to give us more of the same thing. We need a big change and the people’s voices to be heard loud and clear because they all betray the public. They all need to go and the public’s voice must be heard. The public must be in control because our government are a duplicitous pack of connivers.

Mother’s Horror As Teachers Say Her Severely Autistic Son Failed To Arrive At School

A severely autistic teenager sparked a desperate search after he failed to turn up at school – only to be discovered hours later slumped in the back of a bus that should have safely transported him there.

Jimmy Hudson, 13, who is selectively non-verbal, fell into a deep sleep after he was left on the sweltering bus – which had been parked outside the driver’s home at the end of his shift – for more than two-and-a-half hours.

His distraught mother Tracy, 45, from Westcliff in Essex, has lashed out at school transport firm Vecteo, owned by Southend-on-Sea City Council, for their ‘negligence’ and said an apology was not enough.

‘A sorry doesn’t cut it if my son was lying in a morgue,’ she told MailOnline, adding Jimmy was physically unharmed but has been left emotionally traumatised by the distressing incident last Monday.

Remembering the events of that morning, Tracy said she had escorted Jimmy – the first of 13 children picked up each day – onto the Vecteo bus as it made its way towards St Nicholas School in Southend.

 

Aside from the bus driver, the vehicles always carry two personal assistants (PA) to assist the youngsters.

Tracy thought all was well, but at about 10 am she received a call from the school telling her Jimmy had never arrived.

‘What is supposed to happen is that the children are led off the bus by the PAs and taken to a little alleyway that runs down the side of our school. It’s completely safe and there’s CCTV. 

‘The teachers stand a bit further down in that alleyway waiting for the children to arrive.

‘But hours after Jimmy left home, the school rang me to ask where he was because they could not find him.

‘My first instinct was that something was not right.’ 

The school first assured Tracy that they would perform a thorough search because they thought the teen may be hiding someplace on the property.

Staff searched security footage after failing to locate Jimmy, but they were unable to observe him enter the school premises.

By this point, Tracy had made her way over to the school, which had also now involved Essex Police.

Vecteo was contacted several times, but according to Tracy she and the school were repeatedly assured by bosses that Jimmy had ‘definitely’ left the bus.

‘There must have been about four calls. Every time they said he definitely got off the bus, we saw him leaving.

‘Then one of the PAs changed their story and said they thought he did leave, but they were not quite sure. 

‘My son is not a flight and fight child. He’s not one to escape and doesn’t cope in the outside world. He is riddled with anxiety and sensory process and is selective mute, along with his autism.

‘The headmistress and me knew this was not him, it was so out of character.

‘There were only two solutions – he was still on that bus or somebody had taken him.’

The bus driver was by now sleeping at home, but the police officer demanded that Vecteo contact him to search the vehicle.

Outside temperatures that day in Southend were about 23C, but the internal temperature of the locked vehicle would have been extremely higher.

‘The driver told me after that when he went back onto the bus, he could see a black coat at the back of the vehicle. He looked down and all he could see was a pair of legs.

‘The driver then said four times to Jimmy, “You need to wake up” and every time he got louder, but there was still no response.

‘He told me that he panicked, that he’d never felt fear like it because Jimmy didn’t respond – and he didn’t know what he was going to see underneath that coat.’

Fortunately, the teenager did not suffer any physical repercussions, but Tracy said he is still processing the incident and has been emotionally harmed.

‘Just this afternoon he’s come home from school and said: “They could have killed me, couldn’t they?” And I told him, yes, they could.

‘You wouldn’t keep an animal in a car, so why on earth is it okay for a child to be locked on a bus?’

The shocking incident is the latest in a raft of complaints previously levelled at the transport company, which started in 2021 as a joint venture between London Hire Community Services and Southend-on-Sea City Council.

These complaints were the subject of a council motion as well as a petition in 2021 calling on the council to stop using Vecteo.

The petition drew more than 1,000 signatures after service users alleged there were ‘serious safeguarding concerns’.

These included children and vulnerable adults being left on the side of the road, parents waiting hours for collection – and in one case, a child who was ‘blue on arrival home’ after they had an epileptic fit while on the bus.

MailOnline was also told by a Southend-On-Sea City councillor of another distressing incident in which Vecteo employees attempted to deliver a child to the wrong home address.

Former Conservative councillor Tony Cox, who now acts as deputy mayor and leader of the Southend Reform UK Group for West Shoebury told MailOnline that while the service level provided by the firm has since improved, scores of residents had continued to flag ‘colossal safeguarding issues’ against Vecteo.

‘There’s been a catalogue of these incidents over the last four years and it’s just not acceptable.

‘I cannot for the life of me understand how something like this could have happened – and then to even tell the parent their child has been offloaded and dropped at school when that’s not the truth.

‘I do think there should be a serious probe into what happened here.

‘It’s just a miracle nobody has been killed.’

MailOnline understands that Vecteo and Southend-on-Sea City Council have launched an internal investigation into this latest incident. 

A Vecteo spokesperson said: ‘The safety and wellbeing of all children in our care, particularly those who are more vulnerable, is always our highest priority. 

‘We take this extremely seriously and are working with Southend-on-Sea City Council to urgently investigate these matters to ensure this cannot happen again.’

Compensation won’t help, of course, but Vecteo should be penalised heavily if it helps to keep another youngster safe. If that doesn’t work, they should be banned from performing.

Some may argue that the PAs, who are responsible for the protection of the children, were to blame rather than the driver.  On and off the bus, there ought to have been a head count.

As a mother with an autistic son – this would have been horrific for the youngster.

The company had a job to do, and they should have taken enough care to do it correctly.

Kids get up to all manner of mischiefs, and making sure that they were all delivered to the school should have been part and parcel of their work. The driver and the PA’s need to be sacked, and the transport company should have lost their contract, especially after misleading the school and mother by telling her that her child had indeed been dropped off at school.

He’s a bus driver, an experienced driver, probably holding a PSV licence, and as a driver, he would have had a duty of care to all his passengers, regardless of their age. A duty in this case, which he didn’t follow.

Perhaps it is speculation to say that the youngster has been emotionally harmed. However, even if he were asleep, if he had been in the vehicle much longer he could have perished from heat stroke because that would have been the result if he had been in there any longer or if the temperature had shot up.

Why did the company not have a policy of counting on and counting off the bus? It’s not rocket science, but it does involve using common sense which apparently this company do not have.

This is truly terrible – this could have quite easily been a fatality. Our vulnerable children – all children should be kept safe – fact!

Police Hunt Burglary Gang That Escaped Jail

A manhunt is underway for three prisoners who have escaped from an open prison – two years after they were detained over burglary raids on more than 50 homes.

Police have warned the public not to approach Jason MacDonagh, 34, Daniel Harty, 34, and Barney Casey, 24, who broke out of Springhill Open Prison near Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, on Monday evening.

All three, originally from Ireland, were doing time for their roles in a high-value burglary spree in which they robbed £300,000 worth of jewellery and cash from homes across the UK in 2023.

The men were dressed in grey jogging bottoms or standard-issue tracksuits as they made their getaway.

MacDonagh is described as a white man with ginger hair, about 5ft 9in tall and of medium build. Casey is also white, about 5ft 9in, of small build, and has black hair. Harty is a white man, 5ft 9in tall, of slim build, with black hair and a black beard.

The trio were part of a masked gang that would target primarily unoccupied homes, breaking in by smashing windows or forcing open doors and gates.

Chilling CCTV footage captured the group in action, showing them storming properties in broad daylight.

In one video, two gang members can be seen taking out a bay window from a house while cars pass by a few yards away.

The group breaks into a house when a woman is inside in another unsettling footage. Before the burglars run away without finding anything, she can be seen yelling in fear.

Police are encouraging anyone who sees the fugitives not to approach them and instead call 999 immediately.

The gang were eventually captured after detectives scoured hours of CCTV which captured them using two getaway cars, an Audi R3 and a VW Golf, on false plates.

Jason MacDonaugh was identified as the buyer and seller of the Audi. Police were then able to connect his associates to the crimes which also saw them strike near Bristol and Warwickshire.

Phone records also connected the gang to the location of the burglaries.

Police also identified fellow gang members Darren O’Halloran, 38, and Barney Casey, 22, to Yorkshire where they were arrested in early February.

The fourth member of the gang, Daniel Harty, 32, was arrested in Wales later the same month.

All four were convicted of conspiracy to burgle following a trial. They were imprisoned for a total of nearly 50 years at Birmingham Crown Court.

A spokesman for Thames Valley Police said the trio of men had connections with many addresses in the UK and the Republic of Ireland.

‘Investigators are appealing for the public’s help in tracing three prison absconders,’ said the spokesman.

‘Jason MacDonagh, aged 34 years, Daniel Harty, also aged 34 years and Barney Casey, aged 24 years, all absconded from HMP Springhill at about 6 pm on Monday.

‘MacDonagh is a white man, at around 5ft 9ins tall, of medium build and has ginger hair. He has facial hair and was last seen wearing grey tracksuit trousers and a white vest.

‘Casey is also a white man, at around 5ft 9ins tall, of small build and has black hair. He has slight facial hair and a moustache and goatee beard. He was last seen wearing a grey tracksuit.

‘Harty is a white man, at around 5ft 9ins tall, of slim build with black hair and a black beard. He was last seen wearing a blue jacket and grey joggers.

‘They are known to frequent Bristol, West Midlands, Leicestershire, Leeds, Bradford, Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland.’

Police staff investigator, Claire Busby said: ‘We are appealing to the public for any information around MacDonagh, Casey and Harty’s whereabouts, or anyone who may see them to get in touch.

‘We would advise members of the public not to approach them, but to call 999 instead. If you have any information as to where they may be, you can call 101. Alternatively, if you wish to remain anonymous, you can contact the independent charity, Crimestoppers, on 0800 555 111.’

Open prisons – there’s your first problem. However, open prisons and escapes have been about for years, but why were these prisoners in an open prison in the first place?

I doubt it was the great escape, they probably walked around the barrier and waved to the guard on their way out, and it beggars belief – in an open prison, yet they shouldn’t be approached. You really couldn’t make this up!

They were convicted of over 50 years – why on earth were they even in an open prison? Meanwhile, Lucy Connolly is still being held and treated appallingly in prison for saying hurty words.

Don’t approach them, why would anyone want to?

Southport Councillor’s Wife Lucy Connolly Mistreated In Prison

Lucy Connolly has been mistreated by prison officers who have handcuffed and stripped her of privileges, Richard Tice has claimed.

Reform UK’s deputy leader claimed Connolly was ‘manhandled without provocation’ after visiting her today at HMP Peterborough, where she is serving a 31-month sentence for posting a racist tweet in the wake of the Southport attacks.

The former childminder, who is the wife of Tory councillor Ray Connolly, posted a 51-word online rant about migrants hours after Axel Rudakubana killed three young girls in Southport on July 29 last year.

Misinformation that the attacker was a Muslim asylum seeker who arrived in the UK in a boat – when he was born in Cardiff to Rwandan parents – spread rapidly online and led to riots breaking out across the country. 

Connolly’s sentence, which she unsuccessfully appealed last month, has been at the epicentre of a free speech row, with critics including former PM Boris Johnson and Tory leader Kemi Badenoch claiming it was too harsh.

Mr Tice has even proposed a bill – called ‘Lucy’s Bill’ – which would permit people to mount mass appeals against punishments they believe to be too harsh or lenient.

Connolly was allegedly mistreated after she was told she wouldn’t be moved to an enhanced wing with full privileges, but would instead be tossed into a 23-hour-a-day lockdown with the most violent criminals.

When she contested the decision, she was allegedly restrained by officers with handcuffs and taken to her new cell in what Mr Rice claimed was a ‘politically motivated’ response.

After visiting Ms Connolly in prison, Mr Tice told reporters: ‘Five days after the incident, the bruises on her wrists are still significant – yellow. It was obviously horrible what she went through.

‘On Thursday, she was manhandled, mistreated with no provocation. She was denied enhanced accommodation to which she was entitled and they gave her, frankly, the Nutters Wild Wing – druggies, violence.

‘You have to think it’s politically motivated. I think the next few weeks before her release are going to be very challenging, worrying. I think it would suit the authorities to want to provoke a violent reaction from Lucy. I told Lucy to be very careful.’

The deputy Reform leader said he met with HMP Peterborough’s head of security, explaining: ‘He is looking at the complaint seriously. When we get the result of that complaint – if they have ‘lost’ the bodycam footage or any of that funny business then I will escalate the complaint and meet the Governor.’ 

Mr Tice added: ‘I genuinely fear that she is actually being treated as a political prisoner for political purposes.’

An HMP Peterborough spokesperson said: ‘We cannot comment on individuals. Our staff are trained to follow all applicable policies and procedures to ensure the safety and well-being of the women in our care. All incidents are subject to review afterwards.’

It comes after Connolly was incarcerated for posting on X: ‘Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it,’ in the wake of the Southport stabbings.

At the time, she had about 9,000 followers on X. Her message was reposted 940 times and viewed 310,000 times before she deleted it three and a half hours later.

Last month, the Court of Appeal rejected an appeal against her sentence.

Mr Tice said he would be raising his ‘serious concerns’ in the Commons tomorrow when he introduces his ‘Ten-minute Rule Bill’.

The ten-minute rule permits a backbench MP to make a case for a new Bill in a speech lasting up to ten minutes. An opposing speech can also be made before the House determines whether or not to introduce the Bill.

If Mr Tice is successful, the Bill is taken to have had its first reading.

The Bill will be presented to the House of Commons on Wednesday and would mean campaigners could get the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to reconsider cases considered excessively harsh.

He said he hoped the Bill would enable a ‘treble check’ on sentences.

‘The whole point about justice is it has to have the confidence of the British people,’ Mr Tice said.

‘We’re not calling into dispute the brilliance of our legal system and our judges.

‘What we’re just saying is, sometimes, however good you are, you might not quite get it right, and it’s not unreasonable to have a treble check of the sentence itself.’

He said that the number of people required to sign the petition could be up for debate.

He added: ‘To get 500 signatures on a form is not an easy thing. You’ve got to explain it to 500 people, and they’ve got to be convinced.

‘You can always say at the margin something might be abused. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t talk about it.’

When asked why the public should get a say in legal cases, Mr Tice said: ‘Never underestimate the common sense of the Great British public and their gut instinct for where something is fair or not fair. We’re all human, judges can get things wrong, and sometimes there can be political pressure.

‘In this situation, we had a prime minister that effectively ordered the judges to give very strict sentences, and people have very serious concerns about that.

‘There’s a lot of concern amongst the British public that Lucy Connolly and others were the victims of two-tier justice.’

Under the Bill, campaigners would need to get 500 people to sign a petition against a punishment handed down in Crown Court.

The CCRC would review those cases for eight weeks before deciding whether to send them to the Court of Appeal.

Mr Tice said of choosing the CCRC over the Attorney General: ‘The Attorney General is a busy person and ultimately a political person, whereas the (CCRC) should not be that.

‘It could potentially be extra work but it wouldn’t be very many cases a year. It might be an opportunity for the CCRC to say ‘We actually need to relook at our competences, how we operate, our procedures. Are we getting it right? Can we improve ourselves?’.

He did not say how much the proposal could cost the taxpayer but added: ‘I want to have the debate and the discussion and give the British people the ability to have ever more confidence in our justice system.

Who would have believed that in 2025 our government would be locking up people for their views and beliefs?

Thirty-one months (2.5 years) in jail for a tweet is appalling, and she’s been made a political prisoner and has been made an example of. Ultimately, it will come back and bite our government in the backside very badly.

She should be allowed out of prison now. The government have made their point and let’s face it they’re letting everybody else out of jail because allegedly they don’t have space and serious criminals are being released early, so why not her?

People should be cautious and overly concerned because this could happen to any one of us who says anything or disagrees with the government. Unfortunately, she as well as others have fallen victim to a government that will stop at nothing to control the people, that’s unless you’re not born to this country.

The poor woman didn’t deserve the punishment she got or the treatment that she is suffering in prison. Quite clearly she’s been stitched up, and she must be terrified in there.

If it had been another person who had been accused of a more violent offence they would have likely got a shorter sentence, but she was given a ridiculous sentence to prove a point and to keep everyone running scared so that they can beat us into submission.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started