Racist Britain

4fauh4926q351

In 1833, Britain used 40 per cent of its national budget to buy freedom for all slaves in the empire.

Britain borrowed such a huge amount of money for the Slavery Abolition Act that it wasn’t paid off until 2015. This means that living British citizens helped pay for the ending of the slave trade with their taxes.

The British government raised £20 million to pay out for the loss of the slaves as business assets to the registered owners of the freed slaves, but at the time, not a penny was given to the slaves themselves for their time kept as prisoners and forced to work for nothing.

So, in effect, the slave traders or owners were remunerated with funds from the general public and it was only paid off in 2015 and it’s been revealed that David Cameron’s family were slave owners when researchers from the University College London examined compensation payments made to Britain’s most influential families following the UK abolition of slavery in 1833.

I suspect all the dirty historic laundry of England is being washed in public now and even the legendary Penny Lane in Liverpool was named after a slave ship owner.

Even Picton Street in Bristol was named after General Thomas Picton who came to public notice originally for his alleged brutality throughout his governorship from 1797-1803 of Trinidad, as a result, he was put on trial in England for illegally torturing a 14-year-old girl but even though he was convicted, the conviction was later reversed.

I’m presuming that in the next few days or weeks, there will be plenty of stories like this, so I guess by tearing a statue down, we’re going to learn a lot about our corrupt past.

Thousands of British people owned slaves and were remunerated, from vicars, politicians, aristocracy and rich widows, it’s a matter of record, just look it up for yourself.

So, taxpayers were still paying off government debt borrowed to pay millions in restitution to affluent slave owners and while some were knowledgeable of the payments, which finally ended in 2015, there were a lot of people who had no idea modern Brits were paying off the money the British Treasury gave to people, which made them wealthy through human suffering.

The government pledged in 1833 £20 million to compensate the owners of slaves when slavery was abolished in Britain. The amount, while big now, was enormous in 1833, and it took the British taxpayer 182 years to pay off.

There’s a lesson here, and if it wasn’t in our history book, then it should have been and it’s up to us all to read about it and recognise that Britain chose to allow this to happen and yet evidently we’re not racist!

And David Cameron’s family profited from the payouts to the slave owners and his family were still getting payments up until 2015, what a delightful family.

Yes, the slavery abolition act was an entirely pragmatic business dealing by the British aristocracy when they could smell the smoke from the torches and see the shimmer of the pitchforks and the British people didn’t profit from slavery, they may have paid the debt but that ultimately went to the elite.

Racism is the direct link to slavery, without slavery there would have been a free equal world for all men and racism still exists now with weird people who look down on colour and no amount of money can compensate that.

Racism is a nasty word and we shouldn’t be blamed for wincing at the sight of it now.

It unsettles all of us, despite the context that it crops up in and race doesn’t make for comfortable conversation and it’s a fairly dangerous assumption by those who don’t experience it, that racism isn’t a thing anymore, at least, not here in little old Great Britain.

And the way we’re educated about race relations in school doesn’t reflect where we are now, not in England – absolutely not and not so many people brazenly use the ‘N’ word anymore.

Slavey is prohibited, people can sit wherever they want on the bus and police brutality is more America’s problem than ours, so apparently, things are fine, right? But sadly, no. Not really and they haven’t been fine for as long as many people of colour will remember.

And over a period we’ve watched as the United Kingdom has gradually woken up to the fact that we have just as much of a race problem as the one so prominently associated with the United States, past and present.

It may display in various forms, and it may be approached differently, but societies both sides of the pond still have an inherent, systemic, really fecking big problem on their hands.

And I can’t help but feel that Britain’s sudden recognition of how profoundly racial bias is engrained into our political system, employment prospects, social movement, criminal justice and the education system, and I can’t help but feel that it’s all a little patronising.

And this level of ignorance isn’t restricted to the United Kingdom. The difference is that our understanding of what racism looks like in the USA is much different over here in the United Kingdom and it’s no secret that we follow in America’s footsteps and what happens, happens there first before we in the United Kingdom take heed and follow suit.

We haven’t just started to publically address our race problems here in the United Kingdom, we’ve known about it for a long time but all the drama in America has made people wake up and realise that enough is enough.

We can’t just ignore racism as much as we can’t accept it as part of our daily lives and in England, racism is just wrapped up in a nice, more refined packaging, however, it’s just as bad.

And while nicer and politer may describe the way we address our history of discrimination in the United Kingdom, it doesn’t describe the level of influence it has on the way we live.

Barbra Streisand Helps George Floyd’s Daughter Gianna

20200616_barbara_instagram

Gianna Floyd, the 6-year-old daughter of George Floyd, is now a Disney shareholder, thanks to Barbra Streisand.

The young girl thanked the singer for the gift with a post on her Instagram page, highlighting a slideshow of the photos displaying the letter and certificate she got in the mail.

Barbra Streisand, 78, also sent Gianna two of her studio albums, ‘My name is Barbra’ and ‘Color Me Barbra’.

And on Gianna’s Instagram page it said, ‘Thank you @barbrastreisand for my package, I am now a Disney Stockholder thanks to you’, along with a photo of her smiling with her certificate.

While the Walt Disney Company no longer gives shareholders discounts to its theme parks, the brand is known to deliver on investments, with shares doing well over the years.

And it was calculated that an investment of $1,000 in Disney 10 years ago would be worth more than $4,600 as of February 2020 for total revenue of about 370 per cent.

It is unclear how many shares Gianna received from Streisand.

However, we mustn’t get away from how this was all a particularly noxious business and how she will process all that has happened when she gets older.

There will be so many contradicting things to absorb in her head. and no matter how much this wee girl is compensated, crime just doesn’t pay!

This is really sweet and a valuable contribution and massive reverence to Disney and what happened to George Floyd is one of the vilest things we’ve seen to date and nothing this unfortunate man did deserves this treatment and those cops that did this to George Floyd are nothing more than sociopaths and criminals.

Gianna Floyd, the six-year-old daughter of George Floyd, sent her thanks to rapper Kayne West after he agreed to pay for her college education. The 43-year-old rapper created a 529 college savings programme to cover her entire education.

Gianna Floyd took to Instagram to post an image that read, ‘Thank you Kayne West for securing my college education’.

Gianna Floyd added in the caption, ‘Thank You Kanye, Because of You I Will have a college Education… Mommy and I are so thankful for you and your family.’

She also tagged Kayne West’s wife Kim Kardashian while adding the #JusticeForGeorgeFloyd hashtag.

Along with securing Gianna Floyd’s college education, People further reported that Kayne West bequeathed $2 million to organisations promoting the defence of Ahmaud Arbery and Breonna Taylor.

But actually, this little lady is too young to understand, and here’s hoping that she stays centred on her goals.

Losing a father is wrong, and with the same system that took his life still in place, this wee girl will still see and encounter numerous other disturbing things.

I can’t say that I’m a great follower of Kayne West but I have to say that it was a lovely thing to do for the girl and this is an incredible thing that Kayne West did for her, and there is a flicker of hope in the news within an otherwise world of hatred and loathing, and I hope that society becomes a more desirable place for her as she grows up, compared to what her elders have had to endure.

Keir Starmer Blasts Ludicrous Situation

0_Prime-Ministers-Questions

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has said that it’s ludicrous that betting shops are free to reopen while parents don’t even know when their children can return to school.

Sir Keir Starmer said the problems confronting Downing Street on ensuring pupils were safe to return to classrooms were wholly foreseeable and reprimanded the Prime Minister of neglecting to engage with opposition parties to put together a plan.

There was no plan, no agreement and no leadership and Sir Keir Starmer said leaving children at home would be damaging not only to their education but also to their well-being and the longer schools are shut, the greater the damage to children’s well being and education and the growing demand on parents who have to shuffle childcare and work responsibilities.

And the warning from the Children’s Commissioner couldn’t have been starker with a generation of children now at risk because they’ve missed out on over six months of education.

Bookmakers and non-essential shops are reopening on Monday providing they can safely stick to social distancing guidelines.

Bookmakers and non-essential stores are opening on Monday providing they can safely stick to social distancing guidelines and it’s now been reported that Boris Johnson is contemplating dropping the hotly contested two-metre social distancing rule over the summer to free schools to reopen by September.

And at a Downing Street press conference, Boris Johnson confirmed he was moving slower than he would have wanted in some areas but that he wanted all students back in the classroom by September.

But Sir Keir Starmer said that the target was in danger of being missed if a plan was not put in place quickly and that without a plan, there’s a chance that even by September numerous schools will not be able to open, and some children could be out of education for an entire year.

He contended that creativity needed to be used to utilise vacant buildings across Britain, including theatres, museums and libraries, so they could be repurposed as temporary classrooms.

The Opposition leader called for Chancellor Rishi Sunak to announce new funding in the pre Budget report next month to pay for education over the summer months while also pushing for a one to one meeting to take place between teachers and parents before the holidays.

However, Boris Johnson said school students would undergo a huge catch-up operation over the summer and beyond to get up to speed on work children have missed.

The incompetent Tories should have been making emergency plans for schools by making sure they could be safely distanced by finding village halls, church halls and community halls.

After all, the elderly and vulnerable can’t use them but instead, they wasted money on Nightingale hospitals because of course Boris Johnson could then stand there and brag that he’d built these hospitals, alleging he was fulfilling his lie at the election – and what’s happened to them, they’re closed.

The thing is, schools, teachers and children have been let down for years by the Tories, and now we’ve got this pip-squeak Boris Johnson at the wheel who can’t regulate his trap.

The Government Must Face Inquiry

0_Coronavirus-Wed-Jun-10-2020

The last few months have been a solitary and challenging time for numerous households, with grandparents being isolated from their grandchildren and couples in different homes have not been able to see each other.

Therefore, the gradual easing of lockdown in England to allow some people to meet in social bubbles has been a welcomed move but it comes amid warnings the risk of infection continues to be high and the pandemic is far from over and we must assume that our Government has got it right following so many previous mishaps.

And scientists are beginning to recognise what Boris Johnson declines to believe, that errors were made at the inception of the outbreak and the Government’s chief medical officer Chris Whitty revealed that more should have been done to bring in extensive testing earlier.

Professor Neil Ferguson, of Imperial College, said the death rate could have been halved if the lockdown had been started a week earlier, so now, there’s an unbelievable case for a public enquiry into the Government’s administration of the emergency and if lives were needlessly lost, those guilty must be held to account.

England’s high street will reopen for trading next week after three months. This is a critical time for numerous stores and if they’re to survive, they will require support.

And chancellor Rishi Sunak joined retailers, business leaders and the shopworker’s union USDAW in backing the call for everyone to do their part to support our high streets because every penny you spend in your local shop will promote business and keep people in a job.

There needs to be a public enquiry and we know the situation is unique and the government have done their best, but it’s clear to all, regardless of political standing the government have got numerous things wrong and sometimes appear to be winging it from day to day.

What should bother us is if there is a public enquiry, there will only be one if the government ask for it and it seems that the government have much to hide over their actions, so they won’t launch an inquiry.

The problem with public enquiries is that they cost a fortune and drag on for many years, usually without even reaching a final result and politicians, if criticised will say they were simply following the science, so won’t admit responsibility for their decisions, added to the key players such as Matt Hancock who will no doubt have moved on or left politics entirely.

However, we don’t know if there have been any blunders, that’s for the inquiry to ascertain, that’s if there is ever an enquiry but whatever happens, we mustn’t have any politically motivated enquiry like the media or other lefty’s who appear to be agitating the news, and most importantly, lessons have to be learned for the future, and not political points scored.

But what else can we expect from a movement that has endeavoured to make political capital throughout this human tragedy and indeed, have been willing the death toll to increase, and there have been lots of cases where it’s been intentionally and repeatedly distorted.

But when all said and done they’re as dangerous as each other, so it’s understandable that numerous people out there aren’t politically motivated and even though it’s up to an enquiry to see if errors were made, it’s rather plain to see that the government have not managed this crisis well.

We know this is an unusual situation and the government are doing their best but that doesn’t exempt them from media and public judgment when the choices they make are wrong and there must be a fair and honest enquiry, otherwise, it will be another Tory government stitch-up.

The Queen’s Reign Is Effectively Over

 

the queen

The Queen’s reign is effectively over, due to the COVID 19 pandemic, with the virus essentially putting Charles on the cathedra and the coronavirus has done more harm to the monarchy than Oliver Cromwell.

Her Majesty, the Queen, 94, may remain in self-isolation for months and never return to normal frontline regal duties as the government proceeds to facilitate the coronavirus lockdown over the coming weeks.

The Queen has put all her civic duties on hold while she remains with her husband Prince Philip at Windsor Castle and it’s sad but it seems that the Queen won’t be able to continue her role because the COVID 19 virus isn’t going away anytime soon and will be with us for months if not years.

It would be far too dangerous for the Queen to start meeting people on a regular basis, even though she’s always enjoyed getting out and about and engaging with the people but she can’t take the chance.

The harsh fact is that her reign is effectively over and COVID 19 has done damage to the monarchy, effectively putting Charles on the throne.

The Queen who is not expected to return to her duties until sometime in the autumn may never be able to return to her normal responsibilities but will most likely be seen on TV or video links rather than in public.

However, a spokeswoman for Buckingham Palace said that the monarch continues to be active, conducting a weekly audience with the Prime Minister by telephone and receiving her daily red boxes of Government papers.

And that Her Majesty is following proper guidance on engagements and is keeping in touch with her family by telephone and video calls.

Buckingham Palace will be shut for the summer for what is thought to be the first time in 27 years, with events including Trooping the Colour and Her Majesty’s garden parties withdrawn and it’s thought to be the monarch’s most prolonged absence from her official duties in her 68 year reign.

The Queen gave an electrifying address on VE Day praising Britain’s spirit during the lockdown and has said in the past that she feels she has to be seen to be believed, so the measures are expected to be felt deeply.

Her last civic engagement was the Commonwealth Day service at Westminster Abbey in March which was also Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s last formal appearance as senior members of the Royal Family.

The Queen won’t do anything which goes against the advice of people in her age category and she’s going to take all the relevant guidance because she’d want to be seen to be being responsible in her actions.

The Queen took part in her first video call, following the direction of senior members of her family who have used the medium to continue with their royal duties in lockdown and she joined Princess Royal, 69, on a conference call with four carers living across the United Kingdom who have been responsible for looking after the family throughout the coronavirus crisis.

Speaking from a sitting room at Windsor Castle, the Queen spent 20 minutes listening to the women about their experiences and asking questions about the pressures they encounter.

However, Elizabeth Saxberg-Coburg-Gotha portrays a bygone age where we commoners knew our place and never questioned it.

The monarchy was worshipped and bowed to solely because they were titled and our betters, apparently.

Now, the monarchy is nothing more than an anachronism and it’s a multi-million pound, taxpayer-funded lifestyle for a billionaire family of unelected, unremarkable people attending a few engagements.

Planting a tree or unveiling a plaque, or video calling school children for a few minutes. Talk about indoctrinating them while they’re young and where no real skill or qualifications are required, apart from greeting, being friendly to people and pretending they’re interested.

This is going to be the new normal for the Queen and we shouldn’t write her off just because she’s doing things differently and there may be changes to the Queen’s routine but because she’s doing it from her office she can maintain and her reign is not over and the Queen is still the Queen.

Boris Johnson Claims He’s Helped Hungry Children While Ending Their Free Meal Vouchers

0_Prime-Ministers-Questions

Boris Johnson has defended a decision not to continue the free school meals voucher programme to disadvantaged children over the summer holidays.

Labour leader Keir Starmer urged Boris Johnson to reverse the decision at Prime Minister’s Question but Boris Johnson declined and he stated that the £63 million local welfare fund will go to councils to use as they wish.

And Boris Johnson further said that his government had put its arms around people in its crisis and had done its best to accommodate and Downing Street said the scheme will stop before the six-week summer break begins after next month.

A Labour analysis shows the cost of extending the voucher scheme to be around £115 million but charities have asked for the scheme to be extended as parents strive to cope with the fallout of the COVID 19 pandemic.

The Prime Minister and Keir Starmer argued over schools in the Commons and the Labour leader attacked Boris Johnson of neglecting to strengthen the morale of teachers and parents in sending children back to school.

However, Boris Johnson attacked the Labour leader of siding with left-wing trade unions to prevent children from returning to school but Keir Starmer maintained he wants as many children to go back to school as quickly as possible when it’s safe.

Boris Johnson said that they don’t usually continue with free school meals over the summer holidays but that they were also cognizant of the particular difficulties encountered by vulnerable families and that’s why they were announcing a further £63 million of local welfare assistance to be used by local authorities at their discretion to support the most vulnerable families.

The £15 a week vouchers are available to use in local supermarkets by parents whose children normally get free school lunches. The vouchers have been used since mid-March while schools were shut during the coronavirus lockdown.

There was pressure from teaching unions and charities, the Department for Education to extend funding over the Easter holiday and May half term to support hard-pressed families cope with lost earnings during the pandemic but Downing Street has now announced that the scheme will come to an end when the summer holidays start at the end of July, but children don’t suddenly stop being hungry just because it’s the summer holidays.

First, we had Margaret Thatcher the milk snatcher, now we have Boris Johnson who’s punishing the poor yet again and UK politics is not fit for the present day and it’s just a nefarious abuse that frolics as a democracy when in actual fact it’s an elected dictatorship.

There are so many rules that can be bent within government like running out of time to hear bills read, questions raised, delaying tactics and proroguing, added to the fact that politicians don’t care anymore.

Most of them have no decorum, no regard. Never listen, don’t quit when they screw up and are permitted to select anybody unelected to master the real agenda.

On top of this, the oracles generally lie and seem to be controlled and run by the Tories, and either mutes or distort any arguments against their propaganda and it’s permitted to openly denigrate and defeat rivals to their way of thinking and none of this is remotely democratic.

And the BBC is a foul, mocking, immoral doofus station who condescend 24/7 and are absolutely ineffective against our shameful government and Boris Johnson is living testimony of this and Britain is the sewer it is because we the electors enable it to be.

And we seem to forget that there are numerous families slipping through the cracks in an already inadequate system and Boris Johnson has wasted billions, yet refuses to invest in the basics like making sure that vulnerable children are properly nourished.

Investing in the health of children is far too important an issue to be left to the parents alone. Therefore this government has a duty to step in, sadly, Boris Johnson doesn’t know the definition of duty.

Boris Johnson and his government represent a total travesty and he and his inept cabinet will go down in history as the ones who made the worst decisions for our country. Constantly acting too late or too early.

Always putting wealth before health and happy to use the youngest of our population like guinea pigs, putting the elderly and vulnerable last and myself I would sooner see children fed than go hungry but then only a Tory would see nothing amiss with this.

But I fear that the Prime Minister’s charity doesn’t stretch that far, even for his many children or the children of those encountering grave financial difficulties throughout this crisis and as for taxpayer’s money, he appears to have no difficulty splashing the cash on his Tory familiars, giving out contracts left, right and centre.

Lockdown Sex Prohibition In England Concludes This Weekend

1_GettyImages-825250080

The sex embargo that’s been in place in England due to lockdown is set to conclude this weekend, but only for some couples.

Boris Johnson announced that two separate households in England will be permitted to unite together in a support bubble in some cases and that from one minute past midnight this Saturday, two connected households won’t need to follow the two-metre rule.

That means they can cuddle, caress, share childcare and meals, hang out indoors, stay the night and even have coitus for the first time since March 23 but support bubbles must be exclusive, meaning you can’t change the household you are in a bubble with or connect with another household.

Boris Johnson said that there are too many people, particularly those who live by themselves, who are alone and struggling with being unable to see friends and family and that from this weekend they will allow single adult households, adults living alone, or single parents with children under 18 to form a support bubble with one other household.

All of those who are in a support bubble will be able to act as if they exist in the same household and it will be the first time in three months that different households have been permitted to break the two-metre social distancing rule.

But the rules state that one of the two households in each bubble must be a single adult household. This means either a person who resides alone or a single parent who lives with children under 18.

People can’t form a bubble with someone in another household if both your households have multiple adults in them, which means that couples who live in separate houseshares, as many young couples do, can’t leave for coitus.

If a girlfriend lives alone, for instance, she can meet and stay overnight with her boyfriend even if he lives in a houseshare but that arrangement must be exclusive, meaning the other men in that house can’t go setting up separate bubbles of their own.

And Boris Johnson said that if any part of the support bubble developed coronavirus symptoms, all the members would have to follow the normal advice on household isolation and that the government were making these adjustments to help those who are particularly lonely as a consequence of lockdown measures and that was a targeted intervention to limit the most devastating effects of the current social constraints.

This is not intended for people who don’t qualify to start meeting inside other people’s homes because that remains against the law and that at this stage they couldn’t advise people who were still shielding to form a support bubble.

The sex prohibition came about when lockdown rules were modified from June 1 and for the first time, coronavirus lockdown laws shifted from saying what people could do to saying what they couldn’t do.

But a consequence was that it explicitly made indoor meetings of two people from separate households illegal for the first time and the policy was branded a sex ban, yet, No 10 was forced to deny police would break into people’s bedrooms to fine them for violating the rules.

And all this so the dusty Tories can go out and boink their courtesans and this is so hilarious but perhaps we can pass it down to our children as a bedtime story, commencing at 12.01 on a Saturday of course and it’s so nice that Boris Johnson is allowing us to have coitus.

BORIS JOHNSON, do you believe that people out there have taken a word you say as gospel, like your some God. No, of course not! As if anyone took any notice…

Bald Guys Could Be At Higher Risk Of Getting COVID 19

male-pattern-baldness

Bald men could be at greater risk of having serious COVID 19 symptoms, according to new research.

The lead author of the study is so confident in the data that he told a media outlet that they believe that baldness is a perfect predictor of severity.

The newspaper reported that Brown University’s Professor Carlos Wambier conducted two studies in Spain which discovered that a disproportionately large number of men with male pattern baldness were taken to hospital with coronavirus.

The first study found 71 per cent of the 41 patients examined with COVID 19 in Spanish hospitals were bald, with the background rate of baldness for white men of a comparable age to the patients between 31 and 53 per cent.

The second study, which was printed in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, found 79 per cent of the 122 male coronavirus patients in Madrid hospitals were bald.

Scientists have argued androgens, male sex hormones, may contribute to hair loss and increase the ability of the coronavirus to attack cells. That means hormone suppressing drugs could possibly be used to slow COVID 19’s growth and enable sufferers time to recover.

Professor Wambier told a news outlet that they believe androgens or male hormones are the gateway for the disease to enter cells. However, others have advised caution, with Prostate Cancer UK head of policy Karen Stalbow telling the newspaper that much more proof is required before such drugs could be used for coronavirus treatment.

Male baldness is thought to be created by the action of one hormone Dihydrotestosterone (DHT), this acts on hair follicles, weakening them so they weaken losing the hair they hold and shrinking so that regrow hair becomes finer until non-existent.

DHT is a metabolite of Testosterone. It’s produced by the action of 5 Alpha reductase enzyme on free Testosterone in the bloodstream.

A man’s level of DHT is determined by 2 factors, the amount of free Testosterone and the amount of 5AR in their bodies.

SARS COV 2 has been most destructive in developed countries and it’s generally believed that men in these countries are suffering from decreased endogenous levels of Testosterone due to the amount of Xeneostrogens they’re exposed to in plastics, water supply and food et cetera.

There’s evidence that specific groups have higher levels of 5AR, meaning their bodies produce greater amounts of lean muscle which may support the hypothesis that DHT may have some influence on COVID 19’s severity.

However, this isn’t supported by the low infection rates and subsequent death rates in some regions.

Just imagine if studies revealed women were more prone to the virus, there would be an outcry about sexist scientists not doing enough and demands that more should be done to protect women.

So, does this mean we now have to wear a face mask over the top of our heads, perhaps comb-over style?

Altering hormonal balance in males and females has been heavily linked to cancer amongst other unfavourable health effects, so we should be extremely wary of supposed remedies and cures being more dangerous than the illness.

Baldness in men is normally linked to old age but it can be genetically predisposed, and the vast preponderance of men go bald because of a hereditary condition known as androgenetic alopecia, more generally known as male pattern baldness.

And about 95 per cent of hair loss in men is caused by androgenetic alopecia. This inherited trait tends to give men a receding hairline and a thinning crown which is caused by a genetic sensitivity to a byproduct of testosterone called dihydrotestosterone (DHT).

However, there’s mounting evidence that bare heads aren’t a spectacular evolutionary accident after all because bald men are perceived as more intelligent, assertive and high in status, and their polished scalps might help them seduce women or even save lives – way to go all you balding men out there, and at least they don’t have to worry about getting their hair cut.

Maybe we should be calling it Kojak 19 instead of COVID 19 but really we should be waiting for the real science and not someones made-up theories, and these symptoms are getting nuttier by the second and it’s becoming a real joke.

Yet the sheep believe anything they are told by the state media and this is hair raising to say the least.

This is getting pathetic now, grasping at straws for things for the prophets to write about and it makes me question if the person who penned it thinks, wow, I’m so proud of myself now? And who on earth funds this research – next they’ll be telling people that wearing coloured socks are more at risk.

And how much public money and donations are these people being given to come up with this nonsense? And now it appears that anyone with a pulse is at risk of developing COVID 19, particularly those with no hair, asthma, lung disease, heart disease, diabetes, black or Asian and their middle name is Lucky.

You’ve got to laugh about it though, so now all the barber’s shops are closed, so men can’t get a haircut, so everyone is now shaving their own heads bald – now they’re all at risk of getting coronavirus symptoms, well we must be cursed then and this is enough to make your hair fall out with worry.

Priti Patel Could Face Axe As Home Secretary

0_Priti-Patel

Priti Patel is among three Cabinet ministers predicted to lose their positions for not backing Dominic Cummings.

No 10 ordered ministers to tweet backing for Boris Johnson’s top aide as the public erupted with indignity over his flouting of lockdown but the Home Secretary, Justice Secretary Robert Buckland and International Trade boss Liz Truss disregarded the command, and now they’re being ousted in the PM’s Cabinet reshuffle expected next month.

And a senior Tory MP said they were told their future jobs would be affected if they didn’t do it.

Dominic Cummings drove 260 miles to Durham as he was about to succumb to the virus and more than seven in 10 voters in the exclusive Redfield and Wilton Strategies poll say that Boris Johnson should have dismissed Dominic Cummings.

Tory MPs are also hoping to see the back of Commons leader Jacob Rees-Mogg following his shambolic administration of Parliament’s return.

He made them stand in a conga line extending half a mile to vote and a former minister said that remote voting was working quite well and that Jacob Rees-Mogg is the great roadblock to reform.

Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick and Welfare Secretary Thérèse Coffey are also expected to face the axe.

Paymaster General and former Defence Secretary Penny Mordaunt are tipped for a return to the Cabinet after falling out with Boris Johnson during Theresa May’s premiership and there are possible promotions for Environment minister Victoria Prentis and Arts minister Caroline Dinenage.

Matt Hancock is safe, as the Prime Minister doesn’t think he can move the Health Secretary until the pandemic is over, but then the Prime Minister is all about protecting himself as we emerge from COVID 19 but the only way he can do that is with a Cabinet more competent than the existing one.

And Boris Johnson is only keeping Dominic Cummings to see him through Brexit because he can’t do it alone.

Both should go so that we can get someone who can manage our government and the fact that a senior Tory MP said that they were told their future careers would be affected if they didn’t it is out and out blackmail.

It’s also astounding that Matt Hancock is surviving but then perhaps Boris Johnson is keeping him in the hollow hope that his accident-prone presence will make him look better, well it’s not working, is it, Boris?

Dominic Cummings must be rubbing his hands together and Black Lives Matter has taken him off every news agenda. Priti Patel didn’t support him and now she can’t keep our towns and cities safe with these socialised radicals, so it looks like she’s out on her ear.

And we don’t have to dish the dirt on Boris Johnson because that dirt is already out there in the public and the truth is Boris Johnson would be lost without his puppeteer.

You can always recognise a government lead by a narcissist when those at risk of losing their jobs are not at risk for being ineffective but are at risk of now towing to their bosses vanity, and compliments to the United Kingdom, this is what you voted for, a callow spoilt brat whose ego can’t allow him to admit a mistake and whose childishness results in anyone opposing him being removed.

There’s one big point here, if you’re Home Secretary, how can you be expected to support somebody who broke the coronavirus travel rules? And if she had supported him, she’d be subject to the charge of being a hypocrite.

So, Priti Patel didn’t face the sack for bullying but she’s facing the sack for not supporting the puppet master – Dominic Cummings broke the lockdown rules, am I missing something here? – you couldn’t make this crap up if you tried.

Boris Johnson is the best of the lame and self-absorbed and any reshuffle will presumably be more supremely offensive than his existing gathering of yes men and women, and what Priti Patel has done is the most sensible thing she’s said or done in a long time.

And, interestingly, Priti Patel has also declined to appear at the daily briefings. Maybe she doesn’t want to stand there and spew lies and spin like the rest of the Cabinet and good for her for standing up to Boris Johnson.

Boris Johnson couldn’t manage a whelk stall efficiently and look at the mayhem he’s made of the coronavirus. We’ve got approximately five times as many deaths as Germany and barely any country has a worse record than us on whatever metric you care to use.

This crisis has outed Boris Johnson big time and his party are one of the most inept extremists, stirring up hatred towards EU nationals, but oh, Boris Johnson had his life saved by foreigners, and spears are being hurled at him from all directions but then the Tories need to generate some empathy and a spine.

It would be good to see Priti Patel and some of the other parasites out, but it shouldn’t only be about Dominic Cummings, it should be because they’re more dangerous than dysfunctional.

Priti Patel is a despicable woman but she shouldn’t lose her job because she clung to her beliefs and she didn’t support Dominic Cummings lying, and someone as corrupt and dishonest as her declining to defend him speaks volumes.

And maybe she should bring a charge of the ‘Reckless Endangerment of Life’ against Dominic Cummings if she does get the boot.

Priti Patel was voted into the Tory election, and now he’s saying there’s no room in his cabinet for a free-thinking MP. What this bloke needs to recognise is we only gave him our vote and the way he’s misbehaving at the moment, he doesn’t deserve it.

Priti Patel had one hell of a debate with Boris Johnson when this all kicked off because she wanted to suspend all flights coming into the United Kingdom for a few weeks until they could get something sorted but Boris Johnson was having none of it.

We were all in lockdown but he was allowing flights into the country from hot spots with the disease – how dumb can one person be?

I don’t personally like Priti Patel that much, but I’m happy that she clung to her beliefs because the only people that Boris Johnson wants in his cabinet are people who will do as they’re told by Dominic Cummings and suck up to Boris Johnson so that it makes him feel special.

This wretched country is now being managed by someone who wants a pat on the back all the time and told that he’s doing a great job and Priti Patel’s dismissal if it happens, would be almost as telling as her resignation for what should have been deemed sedition.

And evidently, it was her intention to funnel UK foreign aid money to the Israeli Army, while she was international development secretary and she was accused of effectively running her own foreign policy in the Middle East and was forced to travel back early from an African trip for her dismissal in November 2017.

She certainly does appear to highlight a level of corruption at the centre of government, and Boris Johnson is a gold medal narcissist, and it appears that his turbulent public persona isn’t an act.

He is, indeed, madly chaotic about everything besides his own image management and he’s also considerably more vicious and frankly more dangerous than the public understands.

And we shouldn’t take Boris Johnson’s word for anything because he’s not a man to be believed, to trust or admire and he’s a prime show-off.

He’s deprived of wisdom, integrity and responsibility and only in the star crazed, foolish Britain of the 21st Century could such a man have climbed so high and he’s utterly unfit to go any higher, and it’s clear to see why we’ve got the highest coronavirus death toll in Europe and a worse record than the other 200 countries.

Boris Johnson’s cabinet was appointed for their Brexit loyalty, not their ability and as Boris Johnson goes on he will create an even more brown-nosing collection of imbeciles and who will be yes men and women in the core of government.

And it’s coming to something when Dominic Cummings is saved and the other incompetents are getting the push but here’s a better idea, why doesn’t Dominic Cummings sack himself and Boris Johnson, that will improve the country straight away.

Of course, we’ll have to have another election and the Tories won’t want an unelected leader like Labour, so who would be put forward as Prime Minister this time because we certainly wouldn’t want another bag of dog poop because then we would be back to the mire once again, although it does seem that Priti Patel does have a little sparkle of judgement.

But at the moment it seems that political games are being played by Dominic Cummings who’s in the background coercing Boris Johnson to sway that sword again, so who’s actually in charge of the depravity that’s going on in 10 Downing Street?

I think we all know Boris Johnson is just the face, the true Prime Minister is Dominic Cummings and not that I give two hoots about the Tories but to be told their positions are at risk if they don’t support Dominic Cummings simply proves how much Boris Johnson and his band of bullies harry people for their own purposes.

Top Tory Urges Couples Not To Have Coitus Outside

0_Two-peoples-feet-sticking-out-of-tent-door

A Tory minister has urged millions of people not to have sex outside, despite a prohibition on indoor liaisons with people from different homes.

Simon Clarke said that they were not encouraging people to circumvent the law by making love in the great outdoors.

But this unusual request came following new coronavirus lockdown rules that explicitly banned groups of two or more people indoors in England.

Exceptions to the rules, were people from the same home, work or funerals. There was no allowance for pleasure, suggesting people from different households were infringing the law if they have coitus indoors.

By the same measure, the new law doesn’t explicitly forbid coitus outside, and groups of up to six people are permitted under the law in an accessible space or garden, and people from a separate household must stay two metres apart for their protection and the safety of the rest of society.

That doesn’t mean you should go for an open-air fling though, and it’s not only about the two-metre rule, there are also other laws against abusing public propriety which could lead to people being detained, and Housing Minister Mr Clarke urged couples living apart not to chance it.

And when questioned if coitus was illegal indoors but legal outdoors, as long as it didn’t breach public propriety, he told LBC that it was fair to say that the transmission risk of coronavirus in the open air was much lower than in interior spaces.

But he continued that they were not encouraging people to be doing anything like that outside at this time, or any other, so he’s just imposed a bonking ban on the country.

However, Mr Clarke said that they want people to be with the people they love as quickly as possible and that they’ve relaxed the arrangements so they can be part of a group of up to six people now meeting outside in a socially distanced fashion and that they needed to give people as much normalcy as they possibly could as swiftly as they can.

But that people have to realise that there is still a real danger and that there’s still a pandemic going on and that the measures they’re putting in place prevent people spending time away from their homes overnight which are meant to keep people protected – tell that to Dominic Cummings.

This new law relaxes some of the constraints on people’s freedom in England which took force on March 26, when lockdown started. However, the way the law was worded meant indoor groups of two or more people were explicitly forbidden for the first time.

The law defines a gathering as when two or more people are present together in the same place, to engage in any kind of social interplay with each other or to engage in any other pursuit with each other.

People are also forbidden from staying overnight away from where they live.

Before, people were forbidden from leaving their home or meeting outside. That meant someone was violating the law if they visited another home for coitus, but not if they had a guest in their own home, but Tory MP Tobias Ellwood told ITV he didn’t know the circumstances but the policy appeared to be ridiculous and that it was absurd.

Technically the law says people can be fined £100, increasing on each repeat offence up to £3,200, but Downing Street suggested couples meeting indoors for sex, while breaching lockdown rules, that are there for people’s protection, are unlikely to be penalised.

No 10 said police don’t have the capabilities of storming into anyone’s home except if they also suspect grave illegal activity is taking place, and Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s spokesperson added that they will be applying common sense and engaging with the public and only issuing fixed penalty notices when they believe it’s the last option.

Asked if the police would also have the ability to break up small, private gatherings of two people, including storming into bedrooms, the spokesperson said that the police don’t have the capabilities to enter people’s homes under the regulations.

Having coitus outside could risk that twosome having a burnished backside, and I hope many Tory’s understand that as well because sex outside for them is also restricted, and they’d better watch out when they go into the woods, they might be in for a big surprise!

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started