THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

There has been a blistering assault on the government for using hunger as a penalty for people claiming unemployment benefit, using benefit sanctions to berate claimants who miss meetings or who neglect to look for employment is amounting to a policy of calculated destitution.

The Government is presiding over a benefits system that places a harsher punishment on people who have the misfortune to be unemployed, than those found guilty of committing a crime.

The maximum punishment for missed meetings or not looking for a job, or not having enough Universal Job matches is the removal of living expenses and housing benefit for three years, in which benefit claimants will lose £11,000, but with the greatest fine levied by the criminal justice system, it’s only £5,000.

The use of hunger as a punishment is just unacceptable, and it’s extraordinary that our government would choose to penalise lateness to appointments or sub-optimal job seeking in such a way because there is much more fairness in the Criminal Justice System, when it fines or incarcerates criminals, at last they ensure that they meet a person’s basic needs because when a person who perpetrates an offence, ends up behind bars, is given food, clothes and water, they are the basic requirements of mankind, in whichever form it comes.

Sanctions have left some people unable to purchase food for more than a week, and it has led to shoplifting, isolation and physical and mental health troubles.  The human cost of the sanctions system is exceedingly high, with some people even taking their own lives.

Sanctions have a ravaging effect on a claimant’s ability to look for work because those that have got a sanction dramatically shrink to enter their attention on the immediate problem of where they’re going to get their next meal, and not about looking for employment.

The Department for Work and Pensions declared that there were only a really small percentage of benefit claimants who were being sanctioned.   Nevertheless, there are large numbers who are sanctioned, and go on to face long term blocks on their benefits, and last year more than 800,000 claimants were sanctioned for a month or longer.

Benefits are frequently withheld on bogus grounds, and food bank charities like the Trussell Trust support people who have their benefits docked for failing to go to a course, or they had really turned up to, and others had been sanctioned for going to a funeral, rather than going to a routine Jobcentre meeting.  A Jobcentre meeting can be set up for another day, however, a funeral can’t be rearranged, and there needs to be a little compassion because without empathy it becomes a really savage world that we appear to now be living in.

It is far more probable to get someone back to work if they have a good relationship with the Jobcentre.  Once a claimant gets to the point where they believe that they can get work, that they want to work at, then the job is almost done.  They have to be given a feeling of self-worth because some of these people have been out of work for so long that they start to believe they are not employable, if they feel they are not worthy of a job, then they will believe it, and their enthusiasm to work will evaporate.  The Jobcentre needs to construct a claimant’s confidence and determination to work. The threat of a sanction is really going to block that happening, and can be really counterproductive.

There are some people who have been sanctioned again and again, and there doesn’t seem to be a process to examine what is going on.

The Jobcentre needs to find out if that person is really working, so consequently they don’t really care if they get sanctioned.  Perhaps that person might have a mental health condition, or that they are living a really disorderly life, and if they are being sanctioned repeatedly, then understandably something is wrong, and it needs to be looked into straightaway.  There could be mitigating circumstances that are beyond the claimant’s control because we all have different things going on in our lives, particularly when we have children to take care of.

We are not robots, and we do not function on automation, and people cannot be available at the drop of a hat because some have to obtain childcare, and not only find it, but salary it as well.  Some people will not even profit from working, and that is the sort of financial impediment people find everyday because going to work should be an asset above and across the scale.

Younger claimants are put into really humble jobs with really low pay.  On a minimum wage, a person of 21 years and over is, probably, before Tax and National Insurance contributions are even taken out, they will likely get £227.50 a week, after Tax and National Insurance, it will be a lot less.

By the time they have paid out for rent, sewage, water, gas, electric, and extra costs such as bedroom tax, they are left with barely anything for food.  And it appears that there is not enough money to even buy luxuries, which a person should have. Taking into account, they have been working their backside off all week just to make ends meet.

The minimum wage for a person of 16 to 17 years old will be £3.79 an hour.  That’s a £132.65 a week, less tax and National Insurance.  Not much is it?  And Apprentices get even less than that.  Admittedly, most of these teenagers will still be living at home, but there is a majority of teenagers in this age bracket that don’t have that luxury for some reason or another, and most live alone in affordable housing given to them by their local council or housing association.

I’ll grant you that £132.65 is more than they would get on benefit, but of course on benefit they would not have to worry about paying their rent or council tax.  And of course, there are other bills that have to be paid for, and of course food.

In another incident Esther McVey, the Employment Minister, was given a picture of David Clapson, the man was found dead in his flat from diabetic ketoacidosis, two weeks after his benefits were suspended.

A diabetic can’t wait two weeks, which is the amount of time David Clapson, who had been sanctioned had to wait to receive a hardship payment.

When David Clapson’s body was found in July 2013 by his sister, his electricity had been cut off, meaning the fridge where he stored his insulin was no longer operative.

No one should die like that in this country, alone, hungry and penniless.  The government, and the Jobcentre should know that sanctioning people with diabetes is life-threatening, and the system is processing everybody as a statistic, and everyone is just a number.

Esther McVey declined to comment on single instances, but stated that none of the reviews had established a connection between benefit sanctioning, and the death of a claimant.  That’s a cover up, and it disparages everything our society stands for, because it’s as clear as day, that if a claimant that is a type 1 diabetic is sanctioned, and has no money, and can’t pay for their electric because the Jobcentre has stopped their money, then of course, their insulin will have spoiled, which signifies that the claimant cannot take their insulin, and will finally go into a comatose state and die.

Esther McVey is allegedly off her trolley, and has no clarity into what goes on in the world around her, and I’m certain that if it were one of her family members that was in the same position, there would be no sanctioning for them, or would there?

Esther was in the opinion that this incident had been stirred up, and that all procedures had been pursued correctly, well clearly not in this case, otherwise David Clapson would still be very much alive.

Nigel Farage’s right hand man has stigmatized the NHS the greatest consumption of money in the United Kingdom, and compared the health service to Nazi Germany.

In a series of astounding comments, the UKIP general secretary Matthew Richardson condemned the NHS and called for it to be privatized.

His remarks, that were made for an American audience, will be an immense embarrassment to the leader Nigel Farage, who is now fronting calls to axe Matthew Richardson.

City Barrister, Matthew Richardson, 34, was employed by UKIP to keep unsound poppycock out of the media, however, he explosively likened the NHS, that has been treasured by millions, and was Britain’s greatest post war accomplishment, to Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany.

Matthew Richardson talked at two events for right-wing activists in Washington, where he set up fierce onslaughts on the service, blaming much of it on the countries debts.

A number that he couldn’t possibly envisage when he was younger, was now the amount of money that is owed by this nation, but at the heart of this, the Reichstag bunker of socialism, is the National Health Service.

That is evidently why socialized health care is so dangerous, because it’s a ratchet, and once in place, it’s extremely hard to get free from it, and as well. Matthew Richardson launched a bitter attack on taxpayer-funded cosmetic surgery.

Breast augmentation, hymen repair for those who want to be born again virgins, is compensated by the National Health Service, he narrated to an audience of young Americans.

If you have low self-esteem you get new breasts, however, if you’re dying of breast cancer you can’t get the treatment you require to stay alive.

Socialists believe that if someone wants to reassign their gender, the state should pick up the tab, they think that’s how the world works, so if you have a passion for she males, come to the United Kingdom, if you love freedom, remain here.

Appears a little cruel, nevertheless, he is extremely right.  The NHS has become exceedingly tawdry over the years, and oblivious of what the NHS was put there for in the first place.

The Labour Government elected in 1945, and made manifesto allegiances to carry out the recommendations of the Beverage Report of 1942.  The report’s recommendation was to make comprehensive health and rehabilitation services for prevention and remedies of disease, and was enforced across the United Kingdom on 5 July 1948.

The services were initially funded through universal taxation and National Insurance as part of the entry of a broader Welfare State.  They were initially exempt at the point of use, although some prescription charges were shortly ushered into the response to economic troubles.

Florence Nightingale is a historic English social reformer and statistician, and the founding father of innovative nursing.  She came to prominence while attending as a manager of nurses educated by her during the Crimean War, where she organized the caring for injured soldiers.

She gave nursing an extremely favourable reputation, and became an icon of Victorian culture, particularly in the character of The Lady with the Lamp, making rounds to wounded soldiers at night.

Her societal reforms include amending health care in all parts of British society, improving health care and recommending better hunger relief in India, serving to abolish laws governing prostitution that was over harsh to women, and extending the acceptable contours of female participation in the work force.

Florence would be rolling around in her grave if she could see the mess our NHS was in, particularly now all dominance has been handed over to our government, so that they can break it up, and dish it out to whoever they like.

Florence would be leaping up and down with the wrath on her admonishing face because all her good work would have been for nothing.  Once upon a time the NHS would have been a sympathizing and caring organization of nurses and doctors that were there only for the health of their patients, merely because we are all human beings and deserve to be cared for as such, with compassion and care.

The government doesn’t really need to condone themselves for breaking the NHS up, but they will all the same, and they will strike while the iron is hot because now that they are coming up to a general election, they have nothing to lose, and then UKIP will take over, then the real lights will combust.

As we propel closer to the next general election, David Cameron will flounder about attempting to nail an opportunity where he can to demolish our nation, and it’s not by accident that he does this, it’s by intent, and like-minded campaigners in line for Prime Minister will do the same, only more so because they have no compassion for the likes of us.

Emotive compatibility by Matthew Richardson will incense hardworking doctors and nurses, they save lives every day, however, it appears that this UKIP character is seriously likening us to one of the world’s mass murderers.

According to Matthew Richardson, this Government consumes money like it’s gone out of style, and that the NHS was a monumental drain on resources.

His remarks will pile on the pressure for UKIP, and its projects for the health service, despite its claims that it is opposed to privatization, however, they all assure you that they will do something to better our country, only once they get in, they do precisely the opposite.

They are one large organization that group unitedly and work arduously, yet unemotionally expose themselves soon enough, demonstrating that they are simply here to accumulate money, and not to pass it around, as they spread carnage among those less fortunate.

Nigel Farage needs to dismiss Matthew Richardson, or at least come clean and acknowledge that UKIP backs a NHS sell off.

Either Nigel Farage backs this, or Matthew Richardson can’t stay in his office, because Mr Farage can’t simultaneously oppose these remarks, and also claim that his party stands for the NHS free at the point of use.

Allegedly this is UKIP’s agenda on the NHS, because they claim to support the service that almost all people in the United Kingdom hold dear, however, they want to disassemble its foundations.

UKIP can no longer endeavour to dupe the people.  They are a party of Tory people, with Tory money, and they want to unfold the most defective Tory policies, which would have the most awful effects on working people.

Labour faces a battle to stop disenchanted voters switching their support to UKIP.

They are unsuitable candidates to run for government, and they’re unfavourable in some people who will definitely not vote for them, and there is a worry that they won’t deliver what they have said in their manifesto.  They are really good entertainment, but further than this, they are not extremely good at competitive games, so, all they can do is show off to the public, however, to really deliver it if they gain in the next election, is exceedingly debatable.

If they win, and get into power, and they do sell off the NHS, which will capture the imagination of many investors and companies because the principle of Mergers and Acquisitions is that the parts are greater than the whole.

Matthew Richardson’s comments on the NHS are now a major embarrassment to Nigel Farage, who was himself forced to deny he backed privatizing the NHS, after comments he made in 2012 were made public.  As well, Nigel Farage was captured on camera telling his supporters that the state funded NHS should move forward towards an insurance based system run by private companies like in the United States.

Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham takes a firm stand that forced privatization is being forced through like an amphetamine that could be fatal, however, their demand for control is like an addiction with a driven engagement towards its stimuli with extremely adverse consequences.

The trouble is, that negative effect that the government has on us, means that in the end it’s the individuals who experience the greatest levels of it, and that negative effect it has is unidirectional, unlike a guided missile.

Mr Burnham warns that contracts are being signed, which will be tied down to the following government.

Mr David Cameron, our Prime Minister was not up front about his designs to break up the NHS service during the 2010 crusade, leaving voters with no say.

Pressured NHS privatization is now entering a new dominion, and once in. It will be much more difficult to turn around.  Contracts are being signed that will run for five years of the next parliament, and beyond.  UKIP must actually believe they’re something that they’re not, and that their fraternity of predators will swindle the public out of something that has been given to us since 1948.

For the first time in 1948, hospitals, doctors, nurses, pharmacists, opticians and dentists were brought together under one umbrella organization to supply help that were free for everyone.

The fundamental rules were well-defined, that the health service would be available to all, and financed solely from taxation, which implied that people would pay into it according to their means.

Charges of one shilling were introduced in 1952 for prescriptions of one shilling (5 pence), and a flat rate of £1 for ordinary dental treatment, which was also brought in.  Prescription charges were abolished in 1965, and remained free until 1968, when the charges were reintroduced.  Today 2015, prescription charges are now £8.05

If the NHS was abolished and superseded by an insurance-based scheme, run by private companies like in the US, it would be catered for by many organizations, with healthcare facilities mostly owned and controlled by private sector business.

Healthcare would require extended regulations, and to a really high level and professional degree.  There would as well have to be a very high degree of administration that would be required, and the qualifications of such would have to be really high.   Although modifications have been made over the years in the NHS system, and it doesn’t appear to have bettered itself, so I actually don’t see how having private healthcare would make any difference, aside from those whose pockets the money is going into, because at the end of the day, it’s all about profit, and not the well-being of the patient.

If there’s not going to be any improvement, it will not seat heavy upon our government because by then the NHS will have been broken up and sold off to the most eminent bidder.  So, if the system does not work, and it deteriorates, there will be no attachment to our government, but to the private companies that bought into it, consequently, our government is off the hook.

Florence Nightingale’s voice was protected for posterity in a phonograph recording from 1890, which is preserved in the British Library Sound Archive.  Florence Nightingale said, “When I am no longer even a memory, just a name, I hope my voice may perpetuate the great work of my life. ”

Our government clearly did not understand what Florence was speaking about, and how much hard work she put into making patient care so significant, and how important it is to display compassion, and to lift a person’s spirit while they’re in hospital.  Instead, they would sooner downgrade the system, rather than upgrade it.  Private healthcare will not upgrade, it will not amend it, immaterial of whether it’s private or not, and you can whitewash it all you want because the system is so tainted now that no enhancement to it will make a difference, unless we realize why it was set up in the first place.

Go back to bare basics, go back to 1962 and earlier, and our government might realize that taking matrons out of the equation, and cutting nursing staff, and doctors because it was cheaper to bring in doctors from abroad.   Then our hospital system would be more adept.  Cutbacks are not the solution because we are dealing with human lives. That clearly matters no more to our government, all that matters is what they can gain from a human life.

There is a Professional Code of Conduct where professional organizations have their own codes of conduct laying out criteria’s of ethical behaviour owed by members of each profession.

Respecting a patient’s decision about their care, treatment and support are not happening any longer with the controversial Liverpool Care Pathway, where families are being kept in the dark about the fact that their loved ones had been put on the Pathway, and disclosed that hospitals had been paid millions to reach targets for the number of patients dying on it.

The Liverpool Care Pathway, was originally planned to ensure dignified and pain-free dying, which was trashed last year after a scathing inquiry established that it had meant that the handling of these patients was without thought, hurried and ignorant for the treatment of the most vulnerable patients, and in some instances patients were refused water as they perished.

Under the Pathway, doctors and nurses determined when a patient was about to die.  Normally, a syringe driver would pump them with sedatives, while tubes giving food and water were detached, then death would follow, typically within 36 hours.

An inquiry was called for. After leading medical figures condemned the system as a self-fulfilling prophecy, and the thousands of families of patients who had died sounded off.

New prescripts for the care of patients viewed to be approaching the end of their lives will prohibit hospitals from determining that somebody is dying, and then hurrying their death up by sedating them and taking away tubes, and simply just giving them food and water, and some weren’t even getting that.

And it’s been going on for some time.  When my uncle was in hospital in 2004 dying of cancer, it was decided that because he was not going to recover, that they would take away his insulin because that way his organs would slowly shut down, and it would be a quicker death.  At the time we really didn’t have any thoughts about Pathway, however, now that we do, clearly it was more cost efficient to take him off the insulin because he was dying, and it would be a waste of resources, so the faster the better for them.

There is nothing more bowel twisting than seeing family or a close friend that’s dying in front of you, so everyone should spare a minute to think about our National Health Service, which has been part of the formation of our society, it’s part of our culture, that people are envious of all over the world.

So, now it’s a free for all for any enterprise that wants to purchase a slice of the NHS, and the general public has to endure this sort of wish-wash that is going on, and the prognosis is really bleak.

The government endeavour to make us think that it will be better, however, it surely won’t be without its problems, and that’s a big concern, and it narks the hell out of me.

Our government might look as if they have toughened up, but they have toughened up on the incorrect issues, and that one issue is unquestionably not our NHS.  Money should be exhausted in the one thing that we used to be able to count on, so what lunatic decided that it would be more economical to trade our beloved NHS off to the highest bidder?

Sometimes it’s better the devil you do know, than the devil you don’t, and we should retain what has been so iconic in our history, and that is the National Health Service because people know that they can rely on it, and it’s been trusted for a really long time.

Eminem isn’t always the raging rapper who rips people on tracks. Sometimes he’s the sweetheart who visits the home of a terminally ill fan, and doesn’t tell a soul about it.

I don’t usually pen about anyone that lives outside the United Kingdom, unless it’s political, however, on this occasion, and looking at this article brought a swelling to my throat, and a lesson could be learned from this.

The fan in question is 17 year old Gage Garmo, who has been diagnosed with Osteosarcoma, a rare strain of bone cancer, and has been told he only has one week to live, and barely three days ago, Gage’s family and friends started up the hashtag GetGageGarmoToMeetEminem, in an attempt to, well, it’s obvious.

And it worked, he arranged a home visit at Gage’s home in Michigan, which merely 20 minutes from where he lives.

Eminem is a bit of a celebrity, however, he went to spend an hour with this teenager, yet he was adamant he did not want the visit to become a media spectacle, and quietly arrived at Gage’s home.

The pair spent around an hour together, just talking and hanging out.  It meant the whole world to spend time with the rapper, and his icon.

The Real Slim Shady seems to be simply a big softy, although there’s no danger of him melting into my ice-cream… however, he does arouse my flake!

He’s established a career on his tempestuous me against the world, however, Eminem expressed his milder side when he visited terminally ill Gage’s home.

He dashed in on a flight from Atlanta to his hometown, and arrived at the home of Gage Garmo, and the two sat down and talked about their passion for hip hop, and the Detroit Lions.  Tragically, Gage, who had been battling Osteosarcoma, a rare and fast-growing kind of bone cancer, passed away on Monday night, but his family praised Eminem for allowing their son a special last wish.

Councillor Healy, who is a prolific tweeter of anti-Conservative propaganda, retweeted the mocked up poster. The poster likens the Left’s extreme thoughts of Conservative party policy to the Holocaust. The post has substituted the long green country road going off into the skyline on the actual Conservative poster with the notorious location of the railway leading into the extermination camp of Auschwitz, Birkenau. The poster also has a new strap line of more people on zero hours, more tax cuts for the wealthy, and no more NHS.

It is estimated that 1.1 million people, many of them Jews, were wiped out at Auschwitz as part of the Nazi’s Final Solution.

It’s distasteful, and the Jewish people will be exceedingly disgusted by this poster. They don’t need it transmitted on billboards so they just have to live over what they encountered all those years ago, and this plane of incompetence should not be brushed under the rug.

We are supposed to have moved forward, not going back to the dark ages, but we seemed to be continually doing this, and in the end it’s going to be explosive.

There are already riots going on in France, and people are getting killed, or hurt, and now we are having posters put up with a theme of Nazism on them just waiting to explode, the Jewish community is enraged, and they will end up getting together, so that they can band together to take action.

Separately, we have no chance at all, and we can’t afford to be isolated because France is under attack. Seventeen people died in Paris in loyalty to the Islamic State militant group, and that’s what punishment Jewish people get for just being Jewish.

However, now they have to see this disgusting poster, is there no rest from persecution, or do the Jewish people have to keep visiting their past? It’s obvious that the Jewish people shouldn’t have to, but they keep getting reminded of it, and it’s uncertain when it will all stop.

Councillor Healy has now been debarred by the labor party due to her retweet. Nevertheless, she has since got into more difficulties when it was disclosed she had favored a photograph, calling the Royal Family a Nazi family. She has since erased her Twitter account.

A woman has said that she was repeatedly coerced into having sexual dealings with Prince Andrew as part of a lawsuit that claims an American investment banker passed her around to rich and powerful acquaintances as a sex slave while she was still a minor, nevertheless, Buckingham Palace has said the claims are false.

The accusation was made in a lawsuit by women who alleged they were victimized by Jeffrey Epstein, an American multimillionaire who was convicted of soliciting sex with underage girls in 2008.

The woman lodged the case anonymously, and is understood to have been 17 years old at the time, which is viewed as underage under Florida law.

The prince is not a cited party in the legal claim, and has not had any chance to respond to the allegations, and has previously denied any sexual impingement with young women affiliated with Mr Epstein or any knowledge of his behavior.

Buckingham Palace refused to remark on the allegations. Evidently the palace can’t give comments about on-going legal processes.  This refers to the long-standing and on-going civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party to, hence the palace would not comment on the particular subject.

Nevertheless, Prince Andrew’s Tycoon Buddy may have taken compromising photographs of him with the minor he is supposed to have abused.  Details that are entombed in original court papers lodged against deviate Jeffrey Epstein, 61, disclose that he taped the sleazy debaucheries he threw for VIPs at his lavish homes using secret cameras in the ramparts of the guest bedrooms.

One of the purportedly sexual meetings with the Prince, 54, took place at an orgy involving other minors on Epstein’s private land.  The financier, who was imprisoned for 18 months in 2008, after pleading guilty to solicitation for prostitution, kept a sickening hoard of pictures on a computer seized at his Palm Beach mansion in 2006.

Prince Andrew has become a frequent guest at the menage of Epstein.

The adult female in question, cited as Jane Doe 102, referred to the secret cameras in a 27 page filing at the Palm Beach Federal Courthouse in Florida.

On the day that Epstein was taken into custody, police found two concealed cameras and photos of underage girls on a computer in the defendant’s house, and it is alleged that he may have taken obscene photos of Jane Doe 102 with his secret cameras and sent them to his other abodes and elsewhere.

There is no hint that Prince Andrew knew Jane Doe 102 was being held as a sex slave by the magnet, and she claims she first converged with the royal when the financier took her to Europe and North Africa in 2001.

During a stop in London, they called on his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of corrupt media baron Robert Maxwell.  Jane Doe 102 claims in the latest court documents, lodged on December 30, that she first slept with the Prince at Maxwell’s home.

Court papers also alleged that Maxwell also was given naked photographs of her, that she had taken herself to Epstein as a birthday present.  The court papers added that Jane Doe 102 was also coerced into telling Epstein all about her sexual encounters, so he could use the information to blackmail the royal.

She further claims that she was used for sex trafficking for many other powerful men, including numerous prominent American politicians, influential business executives, foreign presidents, a well known Prime Minister, and other world leaders.

Prosecutors conceive Epstein, who loved seeing other people have sex, had cameras fitted to his other residences across the world.

Prince Andrew, who was photographed with Jane Doe 102 during a party in New York, was holed up in a lavish ski chalet in Switzerland. Nevertheless, Buckingham Palace has recapitulated his strongly worded denial of the allegations.

Prince Andrew, vacationed with Epstein in Thailand in 2001, and was surrounded by bare-breasted women on a yacht, however, an odd-job man who spent 11 years working for the mogul claims Prince Andrew frequently had massages when he was an invitee at the tycoons Palm Beach mansion.

Juan Alessi claims the prince enjoyed everyday massages from youthful women, and frequently came out beaming after his rubdowns.  Mr Alessi claims the massages were carried out in a private part of the mansion, that only Epstein and other chosen guests could have admittance to.

Mr Alessi also recounted how he witnessed parties at the waterfront mansion, at which the Prince was present while young girls cavorted in the nude, despite his friend’s 2008 conviction for child sex offenses, Prince Andrew carried on seeing him, and the duo were seen together in Central Park, New York.

The resulting craze led to him giving up his office as Britain’s trade envoy.

Epstein did 13 months before he was released.

Jane Doe’s claims against the Prince came after she linked up with three other women in a suit against the prosecutors, claiming they broke the law by neglecting to confer with them before signing a plea bargain for the tycoon, and it is understood that without the agreement he would have faced up to 15 years in jail.

The ongoing suit was lodged by Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, and cites the US government as the defendant.

The lawyers alleged Epstein’s handling was opposite to the Government’s normal approach in prosecuting federal sex offenses, and the US State Attorney’s office in Florida still has the offensive haul of pictures from Epstein’s Palm Beach home, which were caught on devices concealed in walls in the guest bedroom, nevertheless, the subject is still open to on-going judicial proceedings.

Ghislaine Maxwell marked claims against her as false, and her spokesman stated that the allegations against her were false, and that the original allegations are not new, and have been fully answered and proven to be false.

It was also articulated that each time the story was reiterated it altered with additional and lewd details about public figures and world leaders.  The woman’s claims are obvious lies and should be handled as such.  Ghislaine Maxwell’s original reply to the lies continues to be the same, and she strongly denies any allegations of a distasteful nature, and reserves her right to seek redress.

Buckingham Palace has denied any hint of indecency with minors by Prince Andrew, all the same, if Prince Andrew insists on hanging around with scumbags like Epstein, some of the sleaze were bound to rub off.

His friends have stated that the duke’s integrity is of the uttermost importance to him.  It’s a pity his awful judgement has made it so easy to question everything about the man.

The Duke of York has never learned from his days as Randy Andy the pudgy man-about-town, through his marriage to Fergie, and then on to a crony of society, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and now the claims that he had sex with a 17 year old girl who was being exploited by billionaire Jeffrey Epstein as a sex slave, it’s all absolutely disgusting.

Virginia Roberts alleges in court documents she had sex with Prince Andrew on three occasions. One of which was at an orgy of underage girls.

Are the claims of Ms Roberts true, who knows, it doesn’t really matter because the damage has been done, has it ruined his integrity, in all likelihood it has… however, the only fact that remains is that everyone is going to want to know if it’s true or not, particularly in the aftermath of operation Yewtree.

Prince Andrew’s blinding lack of judgement certainly needs to be analyzed, instead of people construing what they believe is right or wrong, until it resembles something like the truth.  He might have the appearance of an arse, but he’s a fine looking man, he could have any woman he wanted, especially with his huge amounts of cash.

However, if you hang around with the wrong people, like super rich sleaze bag Jeffrey Epstein, sooner or later you’ll start to reek of his filth, and become a spectacle of ridicule, vexing the public into believing that it’s true.

Prince Andrew was an easy target for a player like Epstein, and clueless Randy Andy, who only saw dollar signs, fell for it, and even more extraordinarily so, after Epstein’s sentence for perverting with minors, Andrew still stayed friends with him.

However, Andrew has a long chronicle of having his head turned by a pretty face, or a large bank account, with little worry as to what might lie behind them.  He’s had friendships with bad and tainted characters from Kazakhstan, Libya, Uzbekistan, Tunisia and more.

And it’s still an enigma of how Andrew and Fergie’s Buckinghamshire home was sold through a Kazakh businessman for £15 million, seven years ago, which was way over the asking price, and then left to go to rack and ruin.

Sunninghill in Berkshire is not the kind of place where you’d expect to discover housing dereliction.  It is a region with some of the most luxurious properties in Britain, where nearby are Ascot race course and Wentworth golf club.

Many of the homes have security gates and electronic surveillance cameras to glance over visitants.  Tradespeople are instructed to use the rear gate, and behind the brick walls and dense rhododendron hedges, the passing traveler can glance at larger houses with pillared porticoes, monuments more to blatant richness, than architectural taste.

However, high on a rise, set back from the road as you take the B383 north towards Windsor Great Park, one modernistic house rests shuttered and barricaded, like the dismal, decaying house in an updated medieval novel, but it wasn’t always like this.  Sunninghill Park was the home constructed for the Duke and Duchess of York on their marriage 23 years ago.

It has always been known as South York, a name bestowed by the tabloids because of its so-called resemblance to the sort of Texas style ranch popularized by the soap opera Dallas, but now its just withering away, uninhabited since the Duchess and her daughters moved out seven years ago and sold, evidently to a Kazakh billionaire, for a price which was well over the market rate, and it now rests deserted, its present ownership unclear.

When the Prince says his integrity is of utmost importance, perhaps what worries him is that people should perceive him as a man of integrity.

Frankly, I’m not sure how Madonna could have really likened herself to Martin Luther King Jr or the former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela – who the hell does she imagine she is?  She’s clearly assuming that she’s something that she’s not, which really does paint a picture that she’s unquestionably having some sort of issue in her life.

She went on to say that she was just admiring and acknowledging their Rebel Hearts – Nelson Mandela a rebel, not sure about that fact, but he was a freedom fighter, and the greatest man alive, when he was alive, and will for sure carry on being so for centuries to come, but I think she should have said rebellion and not rebel, maybe she should have named her album Rebellions at Heart…

If she wanted to compare herself to a rebel, perhaps she should have said she was a little bit like James Dean or Marlon Brando, which would have been a much better portrayal.

 

Madonna stated that anyone who fights for freedom is a rebel heart, however, she should also realize that there are different types of rebels, and some are not fighting for freedom.  Nelson Mandela opposed a cause, which was to free the people of South Africa, and for that it yielded a very high price, and he is an icon of admiration to all South Africans, and was of far more importance than being put on an album cover.

The Tories much boasted election poster campaign was in shreds after it came out that the characteristic road was in fact a photograph taken in Germany.

George Osborne said that it was a British road pictured on the election poster, which assured the party would keep Britain on the road to a more abundant economic system.

According to George Cameron, it’s a British photograph, and a British road, I guess George needs to go back to SpecSavers…

The photograph itself comes from iStock, run by the picture agency Getty Images, and was taken by German photographer Alexander Burzik six years ago, although it has been digitally adapted since then.  The colors have altered, the sky has been changed, and a gap in the trees has been made, with some additional fields appended to the backdrop.

Alexander Burzik said that the original photograph had been taken close to his home town of Weimar, in central Germany, however, some Tories on Twitter have supported the use of the picture, despite it being from Germany, and not Britain.

However, the gaffe is particularly invigorating UKIP admirers, which now implies that they’re apostles will be following UKIP around like the Pied Piper of Hamelin, which is a bit of a piss take, taking into account, that’s where the Pan Piper was portrayed as coming from Germany.

 

I’m not criticizing, but wouldn’t that be like the pot calling the kettle black?  So, we can color it over as much as we want, but really UKIP is no better than the Tories, and that’s no understatement.  All the same, UKIP is fundamentally new, and should be given a bit of an opportunity in the run up to the 2015 election, aside from the fact that almost all parties are habitual liars, and are famed for telling all sorts of fibs to make themselves look good, and as viewed with this photograph, they will go to any lengths to do just that.

A former Labor MP has been slammed for proposing that people should only get welfare payments if they’re placed on forced contraception, however, Gary John’s suggestion was draconian and ill-informed.

Gary John’s lost his seat in 1996, and distanced himself from the Labor Party since then.  He wrote his views in the Australian on Tuesday, stating taxpayers should not have to foot the bill for people’s decisions in having children.

Mr John’s went on to state that possible parents of inadequate substance, poor skills or of defective fibre should not enter parenthood while on a benefit.

He also went on to say that some families, some communities, some cultures spawn discord, however, he did not say which ones, and he also said “some”, which also means “not all”, which also means that everyone has to suffer.  I’m not stating that what he is saying is true, however, what I am stating is that by taking everybody who is on benefit and productive, and to put them on contraceptives, signifies that the only people procreating would be those on a middle to high living – sounds a bit like they’re attempting to breed “Stepford Children.”

What Mr John’s is proposing is a criterion of proposed draconian methods, and its ill-informed, inadequate policies and grievous because of the stigma it impounds for single parents.  His beliefs are gestated out of ignorance, and leapfrogs over systemic events of welfare in order to incriminate certain individuals.

In fact the said article only amounts to naive affirmations made by somebody who is privileged, but it’s all about welfare bullying, and the government has an obligation to all its people, whether they’re reproductive or not, and if the government is going to dictate on whether we are permitted children or not, we may as well be part of China and become a communist nation.

While we’re tucked up in our lovely bed, please give a thought to other people sleeping rough on the streets.  We scarcely give a thought to those that are out in the freezing cold with no family or friends to assist them.

They’re not tramps that solicit, steal or borrow, they are really homeless, and need assistance, not in a year’s time, or a month’s time, but right now…

They do not have any possessions, primarily because everything that they did once possess is now gone, and it’s majorly important that we help those in need.  We have Children in Need on TV, so why can’t we help those on the streets?  Children need some help, however, so do adults that have become hard times for whatever reason, it shouldn’t be an issue, they’re still human beings.

There is no Homeless Shelter in Basildon. Essex, but we genuinely need one because the church is feeding about 25 rough sleepers around the town, and there are more rising numbers of people sleeping rough.  There was talk of a dispersal order being brought in, however, that’s no good if there’s nowhere for these people to move onto, there needs to be something put into place.

Nobody was doing anything aside from the church to assist these people till a page was set up on Facebook called “Homeless Help in Basildon and Surrounding Areas”.  Now ordinary people are going into town to feed the homeless, and a location has been set up for a Sunday for the homeless to go and get food that many ordinary people have prepared, taking it, and circulating it to the homeless that attend – now that’s what I call team spirit.

Basildon urgently needs a Shelter at night, like in Southend on Sea, where they have the Homeless Action Resource Project, where they can sleep and get assistance applying for a council home or jobs, however, some people don’t accept that there is a homeless problem in Basildon.

We frequently forget that kindness is free, and these volunteers also raised £250 over two weeks to put one well-known homeless man in a hotel for a few nights over the Christmas holiday, and treat him to a meal.  He is often spotted sleeping rough in the doorway of Primark, in Basildon town center.

Everyone should give something to their community, and now some of the community has come together, and the word is getting about what they are doing for the homeless.  It’s outstanding work that has been done for the homeless, but it’s distressing to think that the council has not housed them, or at least put them into temporary accommodation until homes are found for them.

Even Costa Coffee done their bit for the homeless, and gave one well-known homeless man a Costa Coffee travel mug, it made his day, he was so chuffed, however, it still breaks your heart to know that when you go home, in your nice warm house, these people will be out in the freezing cold with nowhere to go to keep warm.

Margaret Thatcher personally shrouded child abuse allegations made against one of senior government ministers. The Tory Prime Minister evidently held a high powered meeting, who was being tipped for promotion, and told him that he had to clean up his sexual behavior.

It followed an allegation that the minister had sexually abused young boys at the home of one of his political allies in 1982. Nevertheless, the minister seemingly dismissed the warnings, and it is claimed that four years later he was spotted by police looking for young boys for sex at Victoria railway station in London, however, no action took place.

The claims made by an informant with inside knowledge of Scotland Yard in the early 80’s are now expected to be put before the Westminster child abuse inquiry that has been announced by the Prime Minister. It claims that there was an establishment cover up to protect politicians. Judges and police officers involved in a macabre pedophile network.

David Cameron has already agreed to a full scale probe into the historical allegations of child abuse, and he has nominated Lady Butler-Sloss to head the investigation, and although the investigation is in its infancy, its determinations could be extremely volatile, especially if it shows that a previous Prime Minister knew about the allegations.

If this proves to be true, then these extraordinary disclosures will unwrap a remarkable state of affairs, so much so that they’re virtually unimaginable. However, that is what people said about Jimmy Savile, and look what happened to him.

The minister’s supposed involvement in abusing adolescent male children first came clear later on when he had been staying at the dwelling of a constituency agent. A high level gathering involving Margaret Thatcher. Prime Minister at the time, and Home Secretary Willie Whitelaw, as well as a senior policeman, and an M15 officer was carried out to talk about the said behavior.

Nevertheless, rather the minister being disciplined or dismissed, the minister was given cautionary words of advice about his future behavior, and the subject was brushed under the rug, only four years after new allegations rose up.

The politician was said to have been found looking for rent boys in the men’s lavatories at Victoria railway station in London in 1986. The toilets were the target of a clandestine sting by Scotland Yard investigators. The officers approached the minister and admonished him about his behavior, it is thought that a report was lodged by a CID officer, but clearly nothing was done about the minister’s behavior, and yet again it was brushed under the carpet.

Piccadilly Circus is one of London’s most infamous rent boy hangouts, which is cited as the chicken rack. A former rent boy taken in by the Westminster sex ring outrage disclosed he was blackmailed into being abused by top Tories.

Now a respectable father of four, he stated how as a young man he was plied with liquor and was afterward coerced to have sex by a Tory minister, and he went to a squalid house party where two Tories celebrated their first year as MPs by having sex with boys as young as twelve years old.

He as well rubbed shoulders at parties in the 1970s with top conservatives, including Sir Keith Joseph, Sir Rhodes Boyson, and Sir Michael Havers.

 

The young boy came to London in 1975, as a dewy-eyed 20 year old who was taking flight from the difficulties of his home country in which one of his best friends had been shot dead. He meandered the streets penniless, and finally ended up in Piccadilly Circus, which was then the notorious arena addressed as the Chicken Rack, where young rent boys touted for clientele.

He said that he was asked if he was looking for anything, and then the three of them proceeded to an eating place where they boozed on wine, and he was tendered a loan, but he stated they were so kind to him, he just got carried away in the here and now.

He claims he was raped twice, and he was then told they would be in touch, and they said that they knew some extremely significant people who would be keen to encounter new boys, but he felt humiliated because he just believed that they were being kind.

Feeling entrapped, he promptly found himself being pimped out by people who had high profile politicians among their customers. The next day he said he was instructed to keep company with an MP to a country dwelling in Essex where they had sex, however, he pleaded with the man pimping him out to stop.

He was threatened, and told that he had no estimation of the people and the mightiness that they exert, and he was ensnared by two menacing pimps who threatened to mail graphic photographs of him to his parents if he attempted to flee their clutches.

He was even warned that his family back home in Northern Ireland would have an accident if he refused to have sex with their powerful clients.

This man that has been interviewed sobbed uncontrollably. His wife knew nothing of what had happened to him, however, he admitted to her that he was part of this, and that he was raped. He had shut away the subject deeply in a vault inside his head, but now seeing the article, blew it all up again for him, all the dread, hurt and torment came flooding back to him.

He spoke in a hotel close to his home in a small town in Northern Ireland, and he is looking at giving a statement to the government inquiry into the scandal.

He said that he felt that he was at risk, however, these people had been so good to him.  He said that once he was back at the flat that they had taken him to, he felt lightheaded, and got up to leave, however, he was forced into a bedroom, and he felt helpless.  He was then stripped down, and pushed onto the bed.  He did not consent to this at any time, and he felt like he was in an out of body experience, and that perhaps he had been drugged.

He claims he was raped twice, and he felt absolutely exploited.  He was given £30, and told to lighten up, and to stop being so bloody provincial.  The man informed him that he would be in touch.

Photographs were taken of him in bed, and it was stated that they could fall into the wrong hands, including papers and his family, and was told that he couldn’t just think he could run away from this.

Feeling ensnared, he promptly found himself being pimped out by the two men, Kevin or Alan, who had high profile politicians among their customers. Days after he claims Charles Irving, the then Tory MP for Cheltenham arrived.  He approached the politician, inquiring if he was looking for anything, and Irving responded by saying he was looking for him.

He pleaded with the man pimping him out to stop, but only to get more menacing threats. Alan informed him that he had no idea about the people he knew in power, and how dangerous they could be. He said that if they could murder 13 people on the streets of Northern Ireland and get away with it, there would be little difficulty in the setting up for an accident to happen to a member of the lad’s family, this young boy was unquestionably out of his depth.

Before long, he was being taken to parties with a chain of senior Conservatives. It was a house close to Whitehall, where he was guided into a room where numerous men and a few younger boys aged about 15 were boozing.  He was acquainted with an Irish boy, and was then offered a drink from a bowl of punch, and he drank it down. Glass after glass, like it was lemonade.

He was made to sit between two men, who it was stated were both MPs, and they started to rub their hands on his legs and thighs, and he was forced to perform assorted sex acts on some of the men. The scenery was perpetually the same, with a hum of exalted spirits.

The Conservatives felt they were unstoppable…

One night he was taken near the House of Lords and picked up by a peer, they were driven round London while he performed a sex act on him, the peer then gave him a fountain pen.

One of the most seedy parties was thrown one Saturday night at a country house. There were younger boys, and they were all situated in the center of a room, boxed in by a big leather sofa. They were ordered to strip off their clothes and have sex together. He noted a boy of almost 12 or 13 being taken into another room, but he assumed that he’d just been delivered. The boy faced him, and he saw fear in his eyes, it was a look that would forever haunt him.

The abuse before long had an effect on his well being. He was drinking far too much, and had breathing problems. When he was at rock bottom, he went to the home of one of his pimps to face up to him. The pimp opened the door, and he collapsed into the hallway.

The pimp didn’t call an ambulance, he didn’t want a scene, so he put him in a spare room, and he cried himself to sleep. The next day the pimp gave him £50 and told him to go home because he thought he was going to die. He flew back home where he was diagnosed with acute bronchitis, but he didn’t say a word to anybody, and it took a year to deal with it, however, the scars will never mend.

The man in question has turned his life around, he married in 1981, and works as an office manager, but he wants people to know what happened. He wants to see people held accountable, and he wants the truth to come out, and for people to know what goes on in administrative circuits.

Our government seems to have legal power over everything that we do, and they are extremely organized when doing it. They think that they can control everything, it’s their strong point, as they congregate unitedly and scatter mayhem wherever they go, however, the devastation reeks with an unpleasant aroma which suggests that something is not right in the governments abode, which is now bringing wrath to the public.

No teenager should be put through what these deviates are doing to them, it’s harmful and detrimental, and these people are exploiting their influence upon young teenagers, which is clearly inappropriate behavior, and not desirable for teenagers to experience or receive.

If it were anyone else, the issues would have been promptly been exposed, and they would have been caught and charged, and quickly been condemned to prison, however, because it’s inside government, it’s swept under the rug for many, many years, and never talked about, nevertheless, they’re getting away with it, and that’s not acceptable at all.