THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Lost in the System!

Before I watched Panorama – Kids lost in Care, I had no concept of what had been going on, so I must be a bit naive where this kind of thing is concerned.

It’s not because I don’t care, of course I care and, I’m sure thousands of other people care out there as well.

So it’s good that Panorama air these programmes because if they didn’t, then the British public would have no visualisation as to what’s happening out there and, there are some pretty catastrophic things going on.

It’s not because people have no empathy; it’s simply because people are so occupied in their own lives, that they simply don’t have enough time for others and, I’m not saying that it’s wrong, but I’m not saying that it’s right.

I’m sure that grooming scams in the care system have been going on for a long time, but back in the day, things were swept under the carpet and, it was never heard of, but in today’s day and age, everything is brought out into the open and, rightly so. People should know what’s going on in our care systems, after all, these are the children of our future and, should be encouraged and, allowed to grow into sound, respectable adults, but that’s not the case and, in all honestly, this has been the case for an extremely long time. Instead of grooming these children to become decent adults, they’re being groomed for other peoples amusements.

Young people in the care system are being primed and, preyed upon for abusers and, those abusers pay young children to be mistreated.

One of Britain’s largest self-governing foster providers, “the National Fostering Agency” purchased a company in 2006 and, then put it up for sale to another for £130 million, making three times the original investment, so then fostering is for financial gain and, venture capitalists are making vast returns out of children in care.

A child goes into the care system every 22 minutes here in the UK, the ethical dispute, is it right that they should be making sizeable quantities of money from children who’ve been afflicted with abuse and negligence, only to go into the care system and, be given more abuse from their caregivers?

Even so, the care providers demonstrate that they provide the best possible protection and support for these young children! Nonetheless, children in the care system are being exported to care homes across the UK and, a great deal of them go missing and, are never found and, yet there is no comeback on the care homes, which makes me wonder, did they go missing or were they sold overseas and, never seen again – And should there not be an investigation into this? I’m not saying this is the case; I am just purely theorising.

What happens to these children that are placed in care homes in the UK? When they are locating these vulnerable children into such deprived areas in the UK, it means that they almost instantly become endangered. Many children go AWOL and, when they go missing; they are at risk, which means they were never safe in the first place.

When children are placed into care homes, it’s because they were at risk, for whatever reason. If they are being put into care homes because they were at risk in the first place, why would they want to then put them into a care home where they are also at risk, they may as well have stayed at risk in the place where they were in the beginning, unless of course the only reason they are being put there is for financial gain, to make a buck!

Families of these children are saying that they are not being looked after and, I can quite believe that. Some of these children go into care because the parents simply cannot cope with them because of difficulties that the child may be having, so some families are still legally accountable for their children whilst they’re in the care system and, do have a say on what happens to their children, even though they don’t live at home any longer, so the responsibility is still to a great extent down to the parent or perhaps grandparents, who are hopelessly attempting to keep in touch with their children or grandchildren, but can’t because all of a sudden that the child has gone missing, but yet the care home are meant to provide safety for that child because we put our trust into that care provider, thinking that our children will be unharmed.

Care homes for children has gone through progressive alterations over the past couple of decades where care has moved from local authorities to private companies, which sounds to me as if all that the care system is there for, is the profit motive and, a child in care can turn out to be extremely profitable.

Privatising everything is not the solution, especially when children and, old people are going to be in danger because it means that these private businesses are going to hire employees at low wages, which means they may get low quality work, because they are not working for the good of the person, they are working for the good of their pockets. They need credentialed people and, people with a drive to work in this type of industry and, frequent Ofsted reports need to be done.

It’s not a case of, if you cannot hear it or see it, it does not exist. This situation does exist and, they are very real for these children that are in the care system through no misdeed of their own. They did not ask to be there, the same as they did not ask to be born, so they are entitled to be regarded with respect and, as a human being and, with dignity!

DIRTY ROTTEN SCOUNDRELS

It didn’t shock me when I read in the tabloids this morning about the scandals and, cover-ups over the deaths of patients in hospitals, specifically Morecambe Bay and Mid Staffordshire.

Does it not make people wonder what other cover-ups there have been? I’m not saying there have been, I am just saying, could there have been?

After all, we only go by the data and facts that we’re given and, believe to be correct of those statistics and data.

I wouldn’t call it a scandal, I would call it a travesty because these poor babies and people have died. We are talking about human lives, not some paperwork that’s been mislaid by the NHS, human beings have died, which makes it a travesty.

There is no room for error when working with patients in a hospital. These are human beings that are in there being treated and, there is no room for clinical failures and, if this kind of clinical failure is being covered up by health regulators and, allegedly two former health ministers, then the structure of the NHS needs to be adjusted and, someone more capable needs to be running it.

That does not mean it should be privatised, because it seems that when anything goes wrong, immediately it’s privatised because the no one wants to take the blame.

Whatever is going on right now makes our health system a mockery and, Florence Nightingale would be rolling in her grave. The system and great work that she attained is now being overwhelmed by inept people who think that they can play god with someone else’s life and, what’s more, it doesn’t seem to disconcert them and, there is no sense of right and wrong any longer.

There not only needs to be an investigation into what has been going on, but these people need to be named and, the people who have died and, the babies that have died, their families need some closure, in as much as, these people concerned should in due course be named and shamed and, their actions should have some consequence by the judicial system.

SIMPLISTIC SOLUTIONS ON VIDEO

Why does the Chancellor have to narrate a simplistic video giving an explanation of why we need the cuts, what does he deem us all deaf, dumb and blind and, if that’s the case and, he believes that, then why has he reduced all our money?

He’s informed Britain can’t spend money it doesn’t have. Why is he telling the public, we didn’t spend the money, we didn’t get the country into financial debt, but his debt busting intentions have been afflicted with problems as the statistics manifested that the governments alleged scrounging has in point of fact grown in the last monetary year.

Mr. Osbourne was stated as saying, “My job is to bring down the deficit so this country starts living within its means. Doing that means making tough choices”.

I can’t see Mr. Osbourne or the rest of them living inside their wherewithal, particularly when it’s been in the media about certain people in government and MP’s living above their means with two residences, nursemaids and, other little fringe benefits they pick up along the way.

Mr. Osbourne also stated, ‘We will look after those who need our help, but make sure benefits do not go up faster than wages.

When he said they would look after those who need our help, he wasn’t talking about the mainstream public, he was talking about those in his cabinet. And of course he’s going to make certain welfare assistance doesn’t go up quicker than the mediocre salaries that some people get and, as a matter of fact I’m not sure what the average wage is because they keep moving the goal posts and, in doing so they’re baffling the public into thinking that they’re in reality doing them a favour.

By taking people’s money away from them, means that the deficit will not go down because he has failed to boost living standards and, therefore economic growth will fail to go up, but instead it will go down drastically.

If people cannot afford to buy and, spend money on things, then there will be financial collapse and, this is why he is stealing millions to pay for the cost of that economic failure, virtually like panic gain, he is panic capping from the low-income person because he now realises what a unacceptable error he has made and, cannot worm his way back from and, in due course the people will become aware of his oversight and, they will be like a lynch mob.

The government will of course say that it was an error on their part and, that they were perhaps wrong, but by that time, their time at No. 10 will be over and, then David Cameron and his mariners can then crawl back into the dirt from whence they came and, still come out of it smelling of roses, but in the meanwhile they can do whatever they want with our financial system and, then leave it for another future PM to deal with, it’s no skin off their noses.

Looking for one’s Prey!

Women on Top: How Real Life Has Changed Women'... — Women on Top: How Real Life Has Changed Women’s Sexual Fantasies (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

A campaign against the sexual abuse of Women and Girls – Did Boris Johnson fail to remember about the sexual abuse of boys that goes on daily?

Nonetheless, sex and relationship teaching should be obligatory in our schools, in a day and age when sexual relationships is extremely commonplace and, as well an almost habitual activity.

In our culture young teenagers dress up like they are grown women, which men and young teenagers believe it is their god given right to exploit that situation.

Just because a young teenager dresses up to look like a woman, does not give anyone the right to abuse that situation or the trust of that person, who believes they safe in the hands of another human being.

Some men would say that because a young woman decorates herself like an older woman that they’re asking for it and, that is not the case. The case is that all young women want to be older, the same as when they get older they wish to be younger, that does not signify that as they get older and, want to be younger, that we should regard them as children.

There are a lot of Mother’s, Father’s who will talk about the birds and the bee’s to their teenage children, but by the time they’ve got round to it, because of outstanding awkwardness, their young teenagers have by this time acquired a knowledge of what they think is sex education from their friends.

It’s not just about educating young teenagers about sex, it’s about teaching them about the things that can happen to them when they are out there in the real world, such as being taken advantage of and, about sexual assault, the sex trade and such like.

And it doesn’t just occur outdoors, but it can happen in their own home, over the internet. There are so many things that can happen to them in their own front room or bedroom and, Mother’s, Father’s would have no idea until it was too late.

If sex education is going to be addressed, then it has to be done properly and, everything has to be covered.

If a Mother, Father is not going to cover everything, then it is down to the education department to do that, after all, while they are in school and, in the schools care, then it is the duty of that said school to teach and, they have a duty of care to do so, as they also have a duty of care while they’re at school, including lunchtime, breaks and, until they reach home, because while they wear a school uniform, means that the school have a duty of care for that said person.

Times have changed since I’ve been at school, things were much different when I was younger and, unusually strict, particularly when it came to school regalia.

The heel of one’s shoe could not be higher than 1 and half inches, skirts should be on the knee or below, but not higher than the knee and, so forth.

As I walk through my town, I see a great deal of teenagers with skirts that could look like belts and, I can practically see what they had for lunch, which doesn’t do much for my constitution!

However, if I were a man, things could be quite different when looking for lunch and, I’m sure it could work wonders for his physical condition.

So, not only do we have to teach sex education and, violence against women, but we also have to educate them the manifestations that could be caused by being dressed in certain clothing and, although we should be able to dress in what we like, however short, or low-cut it may be, at the end of the day, some men are just animals looking for their prey!

MORALLY OR LEGALLY WRONG?

We hear about government wrongdoings in the tabloids daily and, some are more fascinating than others, but this one just about beats the biscuit.

If this was about Mr. Joe Public doing the dirty on someone else, they would be sent to court for fraud and, most probably imprisoned, or at least an extremely heavy fine, all hinging on how many times they’d done this sort of thing previously.

In the governments case, they appear to be doing it all the time, they’re supposedly fibbing and, duping the figures to make the public think that they’re getting people back to work, or at least more people than is in accordance with the facts.

If the government can’t bring the true facts to the table, then obviously they can’t do the job that they were put in that position for and, should go obtain another job that they can do, because they’re looking more and more inept and, maybe the tasks that they have been given is just too much for them.

The thing is, they’ve told so many untruths, that they’re not sure which ones are in fact true and, now they’re themselves actually beginning to believe their own lie.

GUNFIRE AT THE O.K. CARRAL

This is what you get when you team up with the likes of the EU, although over the years it has been of some advantage to some people and, a shackle round the necks of others.

A wheelchair user was declined an ATOS evaluation for health and safety reasons and, was requested to depart from the building. Does this mean that anyone in a wheelchair or mobility scooter, or who walks with some type of frame or crutches will be considered a fire hazard?

If this is the argument, how on earth are people meant to have their assessments, or is this just another way of making sure that claimants are refused their money and, then they will receive a letter in the post stating that they did not attend?

Does this also mean that ATOS will be arranging home visits for people who are deemed a fire hazard?

BUSTING A BOOTIE!

I’m not sure about them being vulnerable, but it could certainly be graded as making use of a situation, but that would be exploitation on any fully developed person, because any human being can be conditioned into thinking that a companies merchandise is essential to have when expecting a baby or about to give birth, particularly while pregnant, because all hormones are up the creek without a paddle, as all women who have borne a child would know.

You’re all up in the air, fluffy head, cotton wool for brains, not thinking straight, but everyone is an individual case, so consequently I believe it could be a violation of the law for any business agent to approach another person and, although a pregnant woman they can think for themselves, these businesses are taking the upper hand on a situation.

The NHS makes about £2.3 million a year through these deals and, I know everyone’s got to earn a living and, they should be permitted to earn a living, there is nothing erroneous about that.

However, I think that when selling their goods, that it should be publicised on their Bounty packs how much is paid by the companies and, by the NHS. I as well believe that if a person is under the age of 18, that somebody, other than a nurse, midwife or doctor should have to sign any consent forms to say that they have consented to and, read the advertisements and, are happy to have a Bounty pack and, that should apply to anyone that is considered at ‘Risk’.

Warning letter, what they warning you about, that a business is selling their merchandise to the NHS so that they can hand out Bounty Packs?

Some of these mothers have no money and, some mothers are grateful that something is being handed out for nothing, let’s face it, you don’t get many things these days for nothing.

Everybody has to earn a living, it doesn’t matter what type it is, or what kind of company it is. If we are worried about the young and vulnerable, then we should put an end to stands in shopping centres selling TV packages as people walk by, or when we’re walking through a grocery store purchasing food and, they’re offering free goodies to try out. It would convey that we have to put warning markers on everything and, before we consume the food we would have to sign to say we did so at our own risk.

Does this also mean that we can’t watch TV any longer because adverts are telling us that we should buy commodities that we don’t in fact need, but it conditions us into believing that we do and, yet we pay an abundance of money for this honour to the TV licensing people.

Why would you want to pay all that money to be told by an advert that you should buy something you don’t need, but we buy it anyhow because it told us to, yet at the back of our minds we know we shouldn’t, a more economical label would be sufficient, but yet because we’ve been told by some performer on TV that we should, we still do it and, then they’ll give us testimonies by other actors telling us how good the manufactured article is and, we sit there and we’re convinced it’s true.

Or is it just another way to extract money out of businesses by taking legal action against them? It appears that we are getting more and more like America daily. You cannot do this because it doesn’t fall inside the regulations of this law, you can’t do that because it doesn’t fall within the jurisdiction of some other law, all because if we do, then it gives another person a means to take some other person to court and, bring an action against them, because somewhere we are continually attempting to bust somebodies arse!

The people of the abyss

They couldn’t stretch the rules anymore than they’ve already done, except for telling people that they don’t qualify for any money and, that they’re going to open up public institutions to house the poor.

It appears that increasingly we are heading back to the 1800’s rather than of going onward and upward.

The people of Great Britain did not source the debt, the government caused the deficit by filching the excess of their resources, nevertheless we are being viewed upon like we are the lowest of the low, the plague of society.

We’re not the infestation of society and, if the powers that be believe that we are, then it’s only the way that they’ve made us, or shaped us to be, we didn’t make the unemployment and, if there were sufficient jobs to go round, don’t you imagine that the people of England would go to work?

The people of England do not like being out of work, particularly those that have children to take care of and, to have their children look up to them. People want a purpose in life, to have some dignity and, something that they can pass on to their off spring – But where have those jobs gone?

We call it Great Britain because at one time it was a great Britain and, we were glad to be British, because this land was great. Now it should be called the Land of Plenty, because we have plenty of everything except from anything that is British.

Why should the public suffer because of something that somebody else started?

The poor, the poor, the poor, they stand,
Wedged by the pressing of Trade’s hand,
Against an inward-opening door
That pressure tightens evermore;
They sigh a monstrous, foul-air sigh
For the outside leagues of liberty,
Where art, sweet lark, translates the sky
Into a heavenly melody.

— SIDNEY LANIER.

I’M HENRY THE EIGHTH, I AM, I AM!

David Cameron, IDS and George Osbourne are extremely alike to Henry the VIII, they adjust the guidelines to suit themselves. They will hurry something through parliament that fits the bill at the time and, then when it doesn’t suit them, they will rush something else through that suits them, particularly if it gives them more assets.

Only before, when old Henry was up to no good, it was to do with the church and religion and, how he could revise it for his hierarchical advantage, but it still boils down to the same thing, only now Prime Ministers can’t say, “Off with his head!” or “Off to the gallows!”. I’m sure that their greatest past-time was capital punishment and, amateur dramatics. In fact, thinking about it, the whole world is full of people believing they can take a shot at the amateur dramatics, including the government, after all, it is their only one shot to fame and fortune!

Only those that are now affected are the weak, disabled, poorly, paralysed and, exhausted people of our society, but instead of saying, “Off with his head!”, it’s let’s strip them of all dignity instead.

“That’s not right”, I’ve heard people say it, “Surely they can’t do that?”, but they can and, they do and, they will, so long as the people allow it to happen.

Some people are too weak to do anything about it, some people think it will go away, some people don’t care and, some people think it’s a good thing, which one are you?

Human Dignity must be respected and protected. The self-respect of a human being is not only a basic right, but is the foundation of your rudimentary rights.

The right to dignity and equal value is the inherent right of all human beings, as all human beings are entitled to be treated with worthiness and respect.

All self-respect appears comparatively simple, but in general, the following conditions are deemed to contravene human dignity.

Infliction of pain

Dispicable destitution

Demeaning or humiliating behaviour

Ruthless or unorthodox sanctioning

Outrageous prejudice on the foundation of sex, race or disability.

The right to life is the most fundamental human right of all. There is a responsibility to take preventative actions, particularly to people who are vulnerable, such as people who are sick or disabled.

No one should be put through the infliction of suffering and torment, or humiliating behaviour.

Article 4 preserves one of the basic rights, keeping safe human self-respect.

No one shall be held in slavery. No one shall be ordered to carry out forced or compulsory labour.

So, the government has once more altered the rules and, in time, they will change them again and, the wheel goes round, but they are delivering pain on those that are the most vulnerable, perhaps not bodily pain, but definitely mental pain.

They are taking away money that people depend on and, without it they cannot pay their bills, put food on the table or put clothing on their backs. It was bad enough prior to this, but now, people are being left penniless, on the streets, having to go to food banks and, what’s more, they are are having their dignity taken away from them.

People feel like there is no light at the end of the tunnel, the train’s already here, it’s run them over and, who’s driving that train? – The government!

Death and Taxes

How many people could see this coming?

It stands to reason that if there’s not enough money to go around, then people will just help themselves, because people have to eat and, feed their families. They’re not going to sit back and say, “It’s all right, we’ll just starve to death”.

So, law-abiding people who would not have dreamed of thieving before this government decided to take money away from them, will do anything so that they don’t go hungry and, it will not just stop at shoplifting for food, in the end everybody will get on the bandwagon and, loot anything that they can get their hands on, it will end up in a pandemic.

Rising unemployment and, changes to the benefit system and, the increased food and fuel costs are putting families under strain, so can you blame them for doing what they need to do, but something has got to be done about it, because there isn’t enough work out there for people and, their benefits are getting cut.

Of course they will all get branded hooligans and the parasites of our society, but they are just people trying to get by and, in this day and age, food banks should not be a requirement to get by, but more and more people are finding it hard to put food on the table.

Plenty of people throw food away that is not out of date, which could feed a family, but then your missing the point. If we carry on permitting this to happen to the good people of the United Kingdom, it will become run-of-the-mill for people to go to food banks.

This is the United Kingdom (United) we should stand, or else it is no longer a (United) Kingdom.

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this: