THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Museums Free for You and Me

Boris Johnson today set in motion a healthy defence for the admission strategy at London’s largest museum which admittance is free of charge, yet after George Osborne slashed their financial plan in his spending assessment, it may be that it will in due course not be free of charge.

Free entrance to the museum brings a great deal of people, including vacationers, which aids this country financially, which would then help fill the deficit that this government keeps on about.

Free museums are a considerable advantage to this country and, it’s what sets us apart from other nations. It’s a style of instruction and, helps educational groups on trips that parents would not ordinarily be able to provide for their children.

As a teenager living in London, I used to look forward to leaving my home with a friend when I lived in North London and, we used to stroll all the way from North London each Sunday to a different museum every weekend.

It not only kept us busy, but it also kept us out of trouble and, also extremely trim because we were getting a much required work out, although parks were a cornucopia back in the 1970’s, but things have been reorganised now and, children are not getting the exercise and, recreational motivation that they require in their everyday lives.

It’s not just a case of exercise, it’s also a case of community spirit, which we appear to have misplaced over the past 30 years or more and, to be competent enough to mingle with other people without any ambivalence.

Wherever I go I am being informed about this cut and that cut. How many cuts are there going to be before the government don’t have anything to cut any longer because they would have annihilated everything and, obliterated the planet that we live on.

I’m not saying that every single thing should be without charge, but there are certain activities that should be unrestricted because they are the ones that produces a huge buzz.

There are a large amount of financial advantages of having complimentary admission to museums and, not only that, it’s part of our cultural history and, should consequently be given without restriction because it also brings in tourism and money from other avenues that are not without charge.

The Gentleman and the Vamp!

George Osborne and, his fat line of coke! The Lady and the Tramp should read the Gentleman and the Vamp.

Some would say that what he did before he became the Chancellor, especially when done in his youth should in fact have no significance, so long as he’s not doing it at this moment. The issue now should be, is he doing it now and, should the people be questioning his integrity?

The whole situation where this is concerned has become a circus for performing beasts with Mistress Pain and gain.

It does make you think, bearing in mind, George Osborne first faced drug accusations six years ago when he was recorded with his arm round some vice girl and, he denied her claim that the line of powder on the table in front of them wasn’t cocaine – Maybe it was talcum powder!

Ms Rowe said, “He’s a Chancellor and he should tell the truth. At the end of the day if you want to make laws and rules about drug-taking, you can’t be a hypocrite, and he is.”

Moreover of course she is correct, you can’t make laws and rules about drug-taking if you’ve been there yourself and that makes him as she so accurately said, a hypocrite.

Ms Rowe also said, “I know George Osborne in a different way than the public because I knew him on a personal level”.

I hate to point this out to Ms Rowe, but his wife also knows him on a personal level and, I’m sure she could dish the dirt on him anytime she wanted to and, how much is Ms Rowe getting for this report in the paper, because it’s definitely taken her a while to bring this to the public eye, in as much as it was all meant to have taken place in the 90’s.

When she said that she knew him on a personal level, did she in fact imply she knew him on a more intimate level or are they now just hitting back at one other with virtual whips instead of real ones?

St. Social Restraint!

Was it the governments plan to leave homes empty because they knew that councils would wrestle to find families to move in, which then gives them a reason to pull down buildings, or is this just one more situation whereby the powers that be hit us with their societal restraint?

Already they have power by advertisement, monitoring, misinformation and, the refusal of truth in our daily lives, especially after Edward Snowden an American former technical contractor for the United States National Security Agency and, a former member of staff at the Central Intelligence Agency who revealed details of not just several top-secret details for the US, but also British government mass surveillance programmes to the press.

There’s already a breach of our individual privacy, either directly physically or indirectly by surveillance and, it’s turning into a government of control on every citizen’s daily life, as in a Big Brother culture.

There is a large amount of people out there that are at the moment saying that we’re becoming an “Orwellian” society, an all-controlling “Big Brother” society, which frequently observes the people to identify violation of trust through improper thought.

At the minimum 660,000 of the society’s most defenceless families have been hit by the bedroom tax. A great deal are leaving behind larger homes because of the expense and, other people don’t want to take over. Some housing corporations say that demolition may be the only option if the houses can’t be taken over.

The government need to make their minds up, either bedroom tax was brought in to fill the shortfall in government spending, or it was brought in to make housing for people easier, or they have no idea of what they’re doing.

First of all the idea of bringing in bedroom tax was to fill in the debt of government spending, so that they could take money off people that don’t have it, to pay off what the government have used up over the years.

Presently the people can’t pay, they don’t have the funds, so they’re being thrown out of their homes because of it, so consequently if they’re being thrown out of their homes, then no payment, no paying off the shortfall from government spending.

Also, just in case their minuscule plan didn’t work, they thought they’d make sanctions on the jobless and, take their money off them, with the intention of getting the people on unemployment benefit back to work, even if that meant making their lives inadequate because those that have been sanctioned can’t pay their rent, neither can they pay the bedroom tax, once more no payment for government debt.

There has been a considerable amount of speculation about the surveillance programme PRISM, which systematically gathers and examines details on the common person and, there is substantial data that it does so with the help of the large Infobahn service suppliers – I wonder what they make of all the data they gather from me!

Despite the fact that there is at this present moment no evidence that PRISM is illegal, the fact is disturbing in a number of ways and, also merits the volume of examination that PRISM is having on the ordinary person.

Ian Sim, chief executive of North-East based Coast and Country Housing Association confirmed it would think about having houses knocked down.

Mr Sim, in charge of more than 10,000 homes said, “We will do everything we can to the let the properties but there’s a limit on what we can do. Given time, demolition is certainly feasible.

What will they do with all that empty space, after they have destroyed all those constructions they are talking about. Well the headlines indicate an enormous triumph with the Homes and Communities Agency for the affordable homes programme 2011-15.

We are in a New World Order and, for many years, we have seen the Housing Corporation and HCA focus on reducing the amount of associates it would favour to deliver new affordable homes with.

So presently they are going to knock down suitable homes that could’ve been redeveloped to make smaller homes for people that needed it, rather than knocking it all down to make affordable homes, that only the working class can buy and, anyone that is unemployed and, poor can’t take possession, so where will they all go.

Not one of our electronic security that we depend upon for our daily tasks is based on confusion and, neither should cyberspace infiltration.

The PRISM is just the point of the dilemma and, voluntarily or not, the bigger net service suppliers are playing a part to an Orwellian series of events of structured control over the public.

WE ALL NEED TO LOOK AT THE BIGGER IMAGE!

Let me tell you why you’re here on this page, you’re here because you know something, what you know you can’t describe, yet you sense it and, some of you have sensed it you’re whole lives.

Nonetheless there’s something amiss with the world, but you don’t know what it is, yet it’s there, like a fragment in your mind, driving you crazy, it is this feeling that has brought you to this page, do you know what I’m talking about?

Do you want to know what it is?

It is all around you, even now, you can see it when you look out of your window, or when you turn on your TV, you can sense it when you go to work, when you go to your seat of prayer, when you pay your taxes, it is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from what really is.

You are a victim of tyranny, like everybody else, you were born into involuntary servitude, born into a reformatory that you cannot smell or taste or touch, a prison for your mind, yet no one can be told what it is, they have to see it for themselves.

(some of this extract was cited from the “Matrix”)

Economic, social and cultural rights

Everyone should have Economic, social and cultural rights, such as the right to education, the right to housing, the right to an agreeable standard of living and, the right to health.

The British government should have a legal duty to show consideration, keep safe and fulfil financial, social and societal rights and, should take progressive measures with consideration to their fulfilment.

Nonetheless, at this point in time, there is no automatic right to state benefits as the Human Rights Act does not incorporate what is recognised as socio-economic rights.

Why are labour inquiring if economic and social justice can be put into law?

If they were to achieve getting a foothold back onto the stairs of being chosen in by the people of Great Britain, then they can make it a rule, after all they are the powers that be, they make the laws as they desire after all the Tories have managed to that so far.

If the Tories say that it’s a scrounger’s charter, helping skivers, then I object to that statement if it ever comes about, or anything similar to that.

Calling people of Britain scrounger’s and skivers is discriminatory against the poor and, the remarks of harassment and, one should not be discriminated on the grounds of penury.

The government has consistently resisted UN influence to include the International Covenant of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights into UK law 1998 and, moreover UK equality law does not specifically deal with poverty, which means the Commission can’t take anti-discrimination cases on poverty.

Emotions of distress by people and, their hopelessness at failing to be considered fairly were without question interpreted as hostility by staff and, frequently resulted in help being refused and, people who frequently live on the breadline are regularly regarded differently than what people are with higher social status.

The right to freedom from discrimination is a human right and, sets down the beliefs that people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities.

The right to freedom from discrimination is primarily relevant for groups that have been historically differentiated against and vulnerable groups, such as the right to freedom from prejudice, exclusion from all classes of race-related prejudice, removal from all forms of judgement against women and, the rights of persons with disabilities.

It is our human right to be treated the same simply because we are human beings and, should be perceived the same everywhere and, should be the same for everyone and, the doctrine of human rights should be an international practice.

Nonetheless, there should be definite regulations as to admission into different international countries, not because we are biased, but because some countries have less space.

Maybe there should be a population charter that governs how many people should be in each country at one time and, when that country arrives at its maximum, then no more are allowed into that country, but they are allowed out to another country if they have the space. Once one country has enough space once again, then they can allow someone else in, provided they have followed the entry laws, which should be extremely stringent.

Fit for work man rushed to hospital, was such a close call!

A man who was proclaimed fit for work and, was taken off incapacity benefit was rushed into hospital a month after the judgment was made by Atos.

The reason for this is because medical assessments by Atos Healthcare are meant to inaccurately assess claimants as being fit for work when they’re not.

They’re not assessed in an unbiased way and, the proof for their entitlement from their GP is never put forward by the company for the utilisation of the claimant and, Atos employees were told to alter reports if they were too favourable to the claimant.

The work capability assessment is used for the government’s employment and support allowance, a benefit paid to those too ill to work.

Nonetheless, allegedly the overseers are instructed in such a way that they preempt claimants to aggregate extremely insignificant points to be eligible for ESA and, to give points unwillingly.

The man said that he told the overseer of his illnesses and problems, along with depression, dizziness, breathlessness and, lethargy, in addition to ischemic heart disease, yet after being told he was fit to go back to work he collapsed a couple of weeks after the assessment.

Clearly the assessor had disregarded all this man had told them because the approach is to train the assessors in favour of finding reasons not to give points, rather than reasons to grant points, which seemingly means that the results from the assessments are prejudice against the disabled.

Big Mac Attack

This report really made me laugh when I read it this evening.

It’s excellent that a new McDonald’s has opened in Chingford and, has brought about 45 new jobs for the jobless. What Iain Duncan Smith didn’t tell you is, that in Basildon, Essex they not long ago closed down the McDonald’s there, which had been open since 1984.

After 30 years the fast food chain McDonald’s in Basildon was pulling the plug because the store was no longer economically viable. Does that also mean that the people who worked in there are also not economically viable?

So, the Chingford franchise just brought about 45 new jobs and, although the 40 of its employees from the Basildon division have been offered jobs at one of the other four restaurants in the area, I somehow don’t think that all four will have ability to receive all 40 employees, which means many of them would have been offered redundancy.

In essence it looks as if Iain Duncan Smith is getting more people off benefits, but in fact I know when the wool is being pulled over my eyes.

E bay Astray!

It’s surprising that people are allowed to get away with this example of behaviour with a view to human life.

This is about peoples private data that had been set onto a mainframe and, then put up for sale by a data destruction company that had been employed by the NHS Surrey.

I guess that the words data destruction company says it all, a company that wipes out the details from a computer, which clearly was not done in these circumstances, which means that they had no thought for anyone else that was on that computer.

You can sell anything on e bay these days, but when sensitive details about people are registered on something, then the proposition is that it should be destroyed completely, not sold onto the highest bidder.

The National Health Service is a publicly funded healthcare system of England, essentially financed through the general taxation system, which begun in 1948.

Nonetheless, its parent department is the Department of Health, which is part of government, so consequently anything that is part of government, or anyone employed by the NHS should be required to sign an Official Secrets Act, because anything that is private and confidential, where its headquarters are Whitehall, should be protected by the Official Secrets Act and, anyone working within the NHS should be required to sign and, any paraphernalia utilised and, then disregarded, should be destroyed after that.

Labelled Disabled!

I believe that the Shadow work and pensions secretary Liam Byrne is correct in what he stated, that there should be just one single evaluation for all health and social needs.

Nonetheless, not every individual disabled person remains disabled long term and, some do recover from their condition, but then a great deal of them don’t. That’s why we should call on people every two years for up to five years, when after that time, they should never be called again, unless they have a long-standing or severe disability in the first place, then they should never be called.

Nevertheless, if they have recently been diagnosed, then only after two years should they be called in for a casual discussion, just to make sure that nothing has changed and, if they can’t get in for a discussion, then it should be discussed over the phone.

The discussion should be casual and, they should be asked a few questions and, not interrogated on if their circumstances has changed and, if they have not, then they should be allowed to carry on as they are, so long as a doctors certificate is sent in without exception every six months for up to five years and, no more after that.

There will always be people that will cheat the system, the same as there will always be politicians that will apparently deceive the people, it is what we do as human beings, especially if it makes us a buck or two, but that’s why we have fraud officers for inside the DWP and, when someone is caught on the fiddle, they are taken to court and, I believe that the same should be for anyone in government, when it is discovered that they are on the fiddle, then legal action should be taken against them because it is not one rule for the people and, a supplementary law for government.

There should be no examination system. If a person has been considered disabled by a hospital or doctor, then that should be enough to satisfy the DWP that a person is very ill, after all why would a doctor lie about one of his or her patients?

Freudian slip!

Lord Freud must believe that the citizens of England are really ignorant individuals, for him to state that there was no evidence between rising food bank use and, the Coalition governments welfare changes.

Anyone with an speck of savvy would perceive that there was a connection between rising food bank use and welfare changes, you definitely don’t have to be a rocket scientist to realise that; even my granddaughter who’s seven could figure that one out.

There is without doubt a break down in the welfare system, which means that families are going hungry. The issues in this break down need to be addressed urgently before families not only go hungry, but a good deal of them will eventually expire.

Food banks are in danger of being overwhelmed and, the demand for food parcels is in explosive numbers.

One London food bank said it had been forced to write to its local job centre to object because of the rise in people attending the food bank and, that they were struggling to gather enough food to manage with that rise in demand since April.

The only reason that there’s been a rise in people attending food banks since April is because of benefit delays, sanctions and, financial difficulties connected to the bedroom tax and abolition of council tax relief.

Benefits are being suspended for foolish and illogical reasons and, also those who can’t pay for their bedroom tax and, are unable to relocate to smaller homes just because there’s not enough smaller homes to go around.

Just because the people of England are on benefits, doesn’t make them stupid, ignorant or scroungers. The people of England aren’t foolish, they know what’s going on, it’s right in front of their eyes and, they’re not uneducated, nor do they want to live off the generosity of others, but of course it’s not generosity any longer because generosity is to give without asking for anything in return.

Now that generosity has been warped and twisted and, now because after years of giving and not receiving, the people have been lead to believe by the government that anyone who is taking without giving is a scrounger, but to give charity should be given with virtue because generosity was once widely recognised in society as a desirable trait.

Axe that Tax!

The term “horrific” is the only word I could use because care givers are being forced to cut back on basics, such as food and electricity because of the under occupancy law that was brought in by the tory government.

Nonetheless, this is only what I would expect from an Edwardian government because they have no empathy for the people of what was Great Britain and, I’m embarrassed to call myself British, as I am sure many other people of this society are.

We are not British any longer, especially in the manufacturing sector, which has got smaller in the last 30 years.

Bedroom Tax as the people have promptly nicknamed it, has had a negative effect on those people and families caring for the disabled, who need an extra room because now they are having to pay for the other room, which means they are having to cut back on food, electricity and heating.

It’s having a horrifying impact on families that are already trying to care for their sick and disabled relations and, the government are penalising them for being sick and disabled.

Members of the Government seemingly gave £25 million in discretionary payments to help protect care givers and disabled people when the policy was sent into orbit in April, but now it has rocketed out of control.

A great deal of disabled people have been refused discretionary payments because they are being given Disability Allowance, only DLA is not means tested, so consequently should not be taken into consideration.

There is no meaning to the definition “further financial assistance” in law, it’s up to a person to explain what it means, yet in nearly all cases a claimant is required to prove that they are incapable to meet housing costs from their available income, even though Disability Living Allowance is not listed as available income.

Disability Living Allowance is a non-taxable benefit that is meant to help disabled people with extra living costs that they have because of their disability.

Even Though there are no regulations in the Discretionary Housing Payment guidelines to stop local authorities taking into consideration DLA, they are required to take into consideration the grounds why DLA was considered in the first place. By taking DLA into consideration when making a ruling means that they are differentiating that person or persons.

Taking Disability Living Allowance into consideration means that a local authorities decision to do so is against the law and, has complete indifference for that person or persons disabilities.

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this: