Kamala Harris Endorsed By Obama’s

Michelle Obama, the first lady, and former President Barack Obama have both formally backed Vice President Kamala Harris for president.

Early on Friday morning, the Harris campaign unveiled a video featuring the presumed Democratic presidential nominee accepting a call from the political power couple, revealing their endorsement of her.

Harris flew to Indianapolis on Wednesday to speak to the Zeta Phi Beta sorority, and that’s where the video was shot.

The announcement of the endorsement was postponed, a Democratic official told DailyMail.com, so as not to interfere with President Joe Biden’s Wednesday night speech in the Oval Office.

‘Kamala!’ the brief clip begins, with President Obama’s distinct voice coming over the VP’s cell phone. ‘Hey there!’ chimes in Michelle.

As Harris walks through the event venue towards her SUV, she gushes, ‘Ohh hi, you’re both together. It’s good to hear you both.’ 

‘I can’t have this phone call without saying to my girl Kamala, I am proud of you,’ Michelle says. ‘This is going to be historic.’ 

‘We called to say, Michelle and I, couldn’t be prouder to endorse you and to do everything we can to get you through this election and into the Oval Office,’ the former president chimes in. 

There were significant doubts as to why the Obamas delayed endorsing Harris as other prominent Democrats lined up.

The Democratic official told DailyMail.com that the former president wanted to do something ‘more than a statement.’ 

Before the endorsement announcement, the Trump campaign propagated the story that Obama was not happy with how the party was uniting around Harris and that Harris had secured the nomination on Monday night with enough delegates supporting her.

‘There is a strong sense by many in the Democrat Party – namely Barack Hussein Obama – that Kamala Harris is a Marxist fraud who cannot beat President Trump, and they are still holding out for someone “better,”‘ said Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung Thursday night.

The broader intent of the statement was to say that Republican rival, former President Donald Trump, would not finalize a debate schedule until ‘Democrats formally decide on their nominee.’

The Democratic nomination process, which will take place virtually ahead of the Chicago convention, will wrap up by August 7. 

In the short video, Harris told the Obamas she was looking forward to seeing them out on the campaign trail. 

Michelle has not yet attended a campaign event, even though the former president supported Biden by attending some expensive fundraisers, including the notorious one with George Clooney.

The Democrats will vote for anyone who ticks their boxes whether incompetent or not, and there seems to be a lot of arms-twisting going on.

In her capacity as an independent, Kamala Harris never got a single vote. Having received less than 1% of the popular vote and no delegates in the 2020 primary, she was compelled to withdraw right away. Now, she is running for president without obtaining a single vote. The founding fathers of America would be turning in their graves.

Almost every member of her team resigned, and it appears that the woman cannot get along with anyone. People’s unity is the task. She has demonstrated her inability to collaborate and bargain with individuals on both sides of the issue, but then what would America’s founding fathers have to say about Donald Trump inciting an insurrection to try and overthrow a democratic election?

It appears that the Westminster style of administration, in which the party choose the leader rather than the people, has been embraced by the Democratic Party.

The Basildon KFC Worker, Who Was Due To Lose Life Support, Wakes Up Despite The Odds

A “miracle” Essex woman who was due to have her life support turned off after taking an overdose due to alleged bullying has “defied all odds against her” and is now awake and conscious, her family has said. Emma Price, 32, from Basildon, has been in the hospital after her family found her unresponsive at home.

Emma was placed on life support and was receiving round-the-clock care due to her serious condition, and last week doctors believed she was brain dead and were due to switch off her life support on Monday (July 22).

However, in a remarkable turn of events, the decision to end the life support was delayed, and on Wednesday (July 24), Emma’s family confirmed she had woken up and recognised them. The family said she has managed to breathe on her own for periods of time and has managed some facial expressions and limited movements, such as squeezing someone else’s hand.

The family said it would be “many, many months” or even years until Emma may be able to leave the hospital, but said she is “moving to recovery and no longer just surviving.” In an update shared with EssexLive, her brother Jamie Price has thanked all their friends and loved ones for the enormous support shown so far and to the medical teams who got her to the hospital and continue to provide ongoing treatment.

Mr Price said: “Emma is now awake and conscious. She can remember us. She is aware of what happened. She wasn’t aware where she was or how long she had been there. She is communicating via head movements and some limited facial expressions. Such as rolling her eyes back.

“Her left side has limited movement of her left arm. She can touch her face. Touch her nose with a fist. She cannot do fine movements such as finger to nose yet. Medical teams have been giving respite from her ventilator and I’m pleased to report that on more than one occasion she has breathed for herself over 30 minutes.

“She still has infections on her lungs. And the world on her shoulders for recovery. I’m pleased to say as a family that we are moving towards recovery. And no longer surviving.”

Mr Price said it is “far too early to tell” for sure if Emma will be able to return home but the family “remain hopeful”. He continued: “We hope that as time progresses Emma’s recovery can continue to be positive. Defy all odds against her. And live a happy healthy life. However and wherever that may be. She has a photo of her and her dog, which she keeps extremely close to her. Her passion for animals has not stopped.”

Mr Price said that his sister “wants to live”. He added: “I want to thank you truly from the bottom of my heart for everything you continue to do. And have done in aiding my sister’s miracle. Just five days ago I was in a room with doctors preparing to turn off my sister’s life support with my family. An impossible decision.

“I hope this brings some happiness to your life today that a miracle really did happen. And you are all part of this. Please find happiness knowing you are making a difference to the people around you. And you’re cared for. Wanted and loved by all.”

Mr Price said the money raised on the family’s GoFundMe page will be used to support any needs Emma may have moving forward, and “not a penny” will be spent until this is known.

Emma had told her family that she was being overworked while other staff members did nothing and that she caught them talking about her behind her back. She said she was told she was “causing trouble” and would regularly come home crying from the stress of being overworked.

Emma, described by her parents as a “bubbly, kind-hearted person”, had been working at KFC for eight years when she was subject to the alleged bullying which began in the latter half of 2023. The family previously expressed their anger that KFC had told them they would carry out an internal investigation – but that the firm had not asked about Emma’s condition.

A KFC spokesperson said: “Our thoughts are with Emma and her family at this difficult time. Maintaining a working environment that is safe and inclusive for all team members is essential for us as a business. These allegations are being taken extremely seriously and an urgent investigation into the matter is already underway.”

Emma’s family has expressed gratitude to the NHS and the Essex and Herts Air Ambulance Trust for their support.

Sadly, most businesses—big or small—never stand by you if you report bullying at work; they are only there to defend their interests. There are no protections for their staff, and most HR will placate that person, but do nothing about it except backstab them and label them a troublemaker.

Most businesses and companies have a list of rules that they must abide by, they’re called ‘terms and conditions’. The trouble is those ‘terms and conditions’ aren’t for them, they are for you, the employee.

Although we believe HR’s role is to safeguard employees, in reality, it is to safeguard the business.

Emma’s situation should not have been allowed to continue, and HR should have stepped in and done a full assessment. This poor lady must have been very desperate to have taken her own life, and this should not have happened!

Profits From The Crown Estate Boost The Monarchy By £45 Million

Rising Crown Estate income will provide the monarchy with an extra £45 million in funding.

Jumping to more than £130m, the taxpayer-funded Sovereign Grant will increase by 53 per cent for 2025/26 compared to the previous year, as Crown Estate profits have risen to £1.1 billion.

The Sovereign Grant supports the official duties of the royal family, with the boost coming with the news that royal engagements’ costs went up by £300,000 despite a cutback in commitments amid the illness of the King and the Princess of Wales.

Officials said this increase will be used to help fund the final stages of the 10-year, £369m renovation of Buckingham Palace.

Legislation in 2026/27 will review the boost to keep funding of the royal family at a ‘more appropriate’ level, a Palace spokesman added.

A National Audit Office report on Tuesday revealed that the Palace renovation – expected to be completed on time and within budget – has been well managed but structural damage and the discovery of asbestos, which led to increased costs, ‘could have been foreseen’.

The General Election caused a one-month delay in the release of Buckingham Palace’s annual accounts, which this year covered the first full fiscal year of the King’s reign. The accounts were finally released on Wednesday.

The rundown of royal finances – from April 1 2023 to March 31 2024 – covers the months following the King and the Princess of Wales’s double cancer diagnosis, with both away from public-facing duties from January onwards.

But the accounts also span a time of celebration, with coronation and festivities celebrating the crowning of the King and Queen in May last year.

Sir Michael Stevens, Keeper of the Privy Purse, described the coronation as a ‘glorious moment in our national story’ but added: ‘If that was the high point in a royal calendar that would contain many subsequent moments of significance on the public stage, then there were also moments of personal challenge for the family at home, which have affected this year’s report in a rather different way.

‘In the early part of 2024 came the sad news that both His Majesty the King and the Princess of Wales would be withdrawing from public-facing duties temporarily, to prioritise their treatment and recovery from cancer.

‘This inevitably impacted on the number and nature of engagements that had been planned – though may I say how encouraging it is to see the King back performing so many public duties and, more recently, the princess similarly well enough to join the King’s Birthday Parade and the men’s Wimbledon final.’

The Sovereign Grant report revealed the royal household will take delivery of two new helicopters in 2024-25 to replace the existing 15-year-old ones.

All money raised by the Crown Estates, right or otherwise. This takes the shape of a government grant that covers expenses related to staffing, travel, state visits, royal residences, public appearances, and official entertainment.

The King does, however, receive funding from investments, rentals, and land ownership.

The State, not the King personally, is the rightful owner of the Crown Estates. Our assets are hereditary possession of the Sovereign held in right of the Crown. This means they belong to the Sovereign for the duration of their reign, but cannot be sold by them, nor do revenues from the assets belong to them.

Doesn’t it make you feel warm inside as you battle to make ends meet?

We are now like a modern-day version of Game of Thrones where we have to accept royalty and accept that they’re better and more worthy than the rest of us.

Keir Branded ‘Sir Kid Starver’ After Suspending Seven MPs Over The Two-Child Benefit Cap

As he prepares for his first questioning at the PMQs, Keir Starmer is already finding it difficult to control the enraged labour infighting.

Just two weeks after securing his historic victory, Sir Keir will face criticism from the dispatch box after being thwarted by seven MPs in a vote on the two-child benefit cap.

However, the harsh action taken by the premier to suspend the group, which included well-known left-wingers John McDonnell, Richard Burgon, and Rebecca Long-Bailey, caused a stir within his own party.

One of the rebels put on ice for six months, Zara Sultana, suggested this morning that Sir Keir had treated the situation like a ‘macho virility test’. She declared she had ‘slept well’ after voting to scrap the limits on handouts for big families.

A Corbynite campaign group branded him ‘Sir Kid Starver’ on social media, while even supporters warned that he is sitting on a ‘timebomb’.

Despite ministers hinting that they will move to ditch the two-child cap as soon as possible, a further 40 Labour MPs abstained on a King’s Speech amendment tabled by the SNP.

The result was never in doubt, as the Commons voted 363 to 103, a majority of 260, to reject the amendment, with Sir Keir holding a sizable working majority of about 180.

Permission will have been granted to some of those who missed the division, but others are believed to have purposefully avoided participating.

Ms Sultana told ITV’s Good Morning Britain that she did not regret her decision. 

‘I slept well knowing that I took a stand against child poverty that is affecting 4.3 million people in this country and it is the right thing to do and I am glad I did it,’ she said.

She said she saw the email on the way home from the vote last night saying she had had the whip removed.

‘I look forward to many bills that will be coming forward in this government, including nationalising rail, the new deal for working people, but I was also very honest that we should go further; we can make a real difference to people’s lives,’ she said.

‘And when you’ve got anti-charity campaigners, think tanks and trade unions saying that the key driver for child poverty in this country, which is the sixth largest economy in the world, is the Tories’ two-child benefit cap, then it is a moral imperative on the Labour Party to scrap that and do everything that they can to make sure that not a single child has to live in unnecessary hardship and poverty.’

Asked on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme for her view on Sir Keir, Ms Sultana said: ‘I’m not interested in playing up to this macho virility test that seems to be what people are talking about. It’s about the material conditions of 330,000 children living in poverty.’

Pressed on whether she meant Sir Keir had viewed the situation as a macho test, Ms Sultana said: ‘This isn’t a game; this is about people’s lives.’

One Labour MP told Politico they were worried about the ruthlessness of the response, saying it was ‘not a good timebomb to be too casual about, whatever your mandate looks like now’. 

Former shadow home secretary Diane Abbott said she could not vote for ‘personal reasons’, but was ‘horrified’ at the action taken against the rebels. 

Speaking ahead of the vote, Mr McDonnell, who was shadow chancellor under Jeremy Corbyn, confirmed he would back the SNP’s amendment.

He said, ‘I was in Parliament in 2015 when it [the cap] was introduced, and I condemned it and voted against it then. It’s really iniquitous; it’s forced large numbers of children into poverty and caused real hardship.

‘I don’t like voting for other parties’ amendments but I’m following Keir Starmer’s example, as he said, put country before party.

‘So I’m putting lifting children out of poverty before party whipping. 120 different organisations have called for the scrapping of the two-child limit, and they comprise of community groups, religious groups, churches, trade unions, and many in my own community.

‘I think it’s a dreadful measure that the Conservatives introduced and we could lift anywhere up to 400,000 children out of poverty just by this one measure.’

In the end, he was joined in rebelling by Apsana Begum, Richard Burgon, Ian Byrne, Imran Hussain, Rebecca Long-Bailey, and Zarah Sultana.

These days, the majority of families are made up of immigrants, and the patriarch and their respective religions force them to have children. If this is the case, then their patriarch and religious leaders should pay for those children.

But then you have other scenarios such as life changes, divorce, widowhood, redundancy, life-changing injury or even illness. None of us can foresee the future, but our government are allowing children to suffer.

Parties that compete for power often make promises to the populace that they will carry out, even though they never plan to. The public is duped, and Keir Starmer succeeded in tricking them by appearing reasonable for a while to gain power.

Two-Child Benefits Cap Could Be Axed

As Keir Starmer confronts his first Labour revolt, ministers have hinted that the two-child benefits cap may be removed soon.

Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall insisted the government must ‘do the sums’ before confirming that the policy will be ditched.

The Prime Minister has been working extremely hard to quell mounting resentment among his own supporters over his unwillingness to remove the limitations on family assistance distributions. Before making a commitment, Chancellor Rachel Reeves is emphatic that the public finances must stabilise.

A King’s Speech amendment might force a vote on the matter, albeit Labour has a massive 180-point working majority, so there’s no chance of losing.

On a round of interviews, Ms Kendall warned that things could not be changed ‘overnight’.

She told Times Radio: ‘We were elected on the promise that we would only make spending commitments that we know we can keep and we are facing a dire inheritance from the Tories.

‘I’m not into a wink and a nudge politics.

‘I’m not going to look constituents in the face and tell them I’m going to do something without actually having done the sums figuring out how I’m going to pay for it, figuring out how we transform opportunity for those children, not just in terms of their household income, which is essential, but about having sustained improvements to helping people get work and get on in work, more childcare, early years support, sorting out the dire state of people’s housing.

‘It’s got to be part of a much bigger approach.’

Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said yesterday that the Government would look at lifting the cap as ‘one of a number of levers’ to tackle child poverty.

But she warned it would be ‘very expensive’ to reverse the policy as Labour battles with ‘really tough’ public finances.

Around 20 Labour backbenchers have already pledged to support an amendment to the King’s Speech demanding the Government ‘abolish’ the cap.

Ex-chancellor George Osborne imposed a two-child benefit cap that prohibits parents from obtaining child tax credit or universal credit for a third or subsequent child born after April 2017.

Before becoming PM, Sir Keir said he would ditch the two-child limit ‘in an ideal world’ but added that ‘we haven’t got the resources to do it at the moment’.

The Resolution Foundation has calculated that abolishing the two-child limit would cost the Government somewhere between £2.5billion and £3.6billion in 2024/25 but said such costs are ‘low compared to the harm that the policy causes’.

The problem that we have is the NHS is overrun, and now has its issues. We are lacking in school places, we are lacking in infrastructure, and we are short on housing stock, but yet our government encourage immigrants to enter our country, have loads of children, and then tell the good British people that if we have the cheek to have more than two children we will not get child benefits for them.

We are being outbred by our guests, and now the good British people can’t afford housing or acquire council housing because there is not enough housing stock and more and more British citizens are choosing not to have any children at all, and our government have allowed this to happen, but it has to stop!

First Time Ultra-Orthodox Jews Have Been Drafted Into Israel’s Army

Amid concerns that the Middle East war may worsen, Israel has called up ultra-Orthodox Jews to serve in the armed forces for the first time.

The Israel Defence Forces have sent draft notices to call up 1,000 men from the devout Haredi community to bolster the army’s ranks—the first of 3,000 to be conscripted in the coming weeks.

It comes after the Supreme Court of Israel ruled that men who identify as ultra-Orthodox could no longer be excused from military duty, breaking a deal that had existed since Israel’s founding in 1948.

The move comes amid heightened tensions in the region after the IDF carried out air strikes on Houthi rebel targets in Yemen, a day after a drone launched by the group hit Tel Aviv.

Conscripting ultra-Orthodox men is a contentious issue in Israel and the Haredi leadership fiercely resists any effort to draft young men, with some rabbis even urging anyone who receives call-up orders to burn them.

A large number of ultra-Orthodox Jews feel that military service is incompatible with their way of life. These Jews typically attend yeshivas or religious schools.

However, with Israeli troops still fighting in Gaza more than nine months after the Hamas terror attack on October 7, there has been growing pressure from the army and secular Israelis to spread the burden of military service.

By law, Israeli residents must enlist in the military at the age of eighteen and serve for at least 24 months. Since October 7, around 300,000 of these individuals have been called up for reserve service.

The government has said it will have to extend military service for conscripts and reservists to meet the country’s security needs.

The IDF said anyone ignoring multiple draft orders could be prevented from leaving the country or even face jail.

It follows a Houthi drone attack on a Tel Aviv apartment block on Friday that left a 50-year-old man dead and eight other people injured.

Speaking on Saturday evening after the attacks, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his country would defend itself ‘by all means’.

Israel responded by launching a series of airstrikes in Yemen—the first time it has struck the country directly—which Houthi-linked news outlets said killed six people and injured more than 80.

Israeli forces said they intercepted a ballistic missile fired yesterday in retaliation.

While all Israelis should help to defend their nation, dealing with ultra-Orthodox Jews can be challenging. They have so far done everything to resist, so it’s about time they put in some graft like the rest of their country.

Ben Gurion came up with an exemption plan that was somewhat of a Faustian bargain.

Although the nation was established on secular principles, it retained the traditional cultural practice of Judaism. allowing the Orthodox, who at the time suited the majority, to pray and preserve their religion while everyone else fought to defend and establish the nation.

They essentially outsourced religion to the orthodox custodians.

The number of orthodox people has increased throughout time, and they have all had a large number of children. As a result, they are now a greater burden on the welfare state and have significantly increased political power.

They are no longer a small minority in their demographic, and it now seems that the rest of Israel is no longer prepared to subsidise their way of life. This has been brewing for a long time, and there are many roles that they could perform that would not contradict their way of life.

Biden Stepped Aside For What Reason?

Despite weeks of crisis talks and dozens of Democrats calling for him to step down, Joe Biden’s decision to withdraw was made at the last minute.

The 81-year-old president was spending time alone at his $3.4 million vacation house in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, when he received polling data indicating he was no longer able to defeat Donald Trump.

At that point, they wrote a letter stating that he should resign to protect the Democratic Party’s future.

Millions of dollars had been withheld from him by donors, the number of Democrats urging him to withdraw was increasing daily, and polls indicated that his prospects of defeating Donald Trump were diminishing following his appalling performance in the debate.

Jill Biden was there when her husband eventually made the historic call, giving in to mounting pressure. However, a spokeswoman for the First Lady said it was the president’s judgement alone and confirmed he made it late.

‘Down to the last hours of the decision only he could make, she (Jill Biden) was supportive of whatever road he chose,’ the spokeswoman said. ‘She’s his biggest believer, champion, and always on his side, in that trusted way only a spouse of almost 50 years can be.’ 

What ultimately motivated Biden to take the drastic step that surprised most of his reelection campaign staff and some members of his White House staff is the question at hand.

On Saturday evening, Biden summoned to his side two men who have been there since his political start: advisers Steve Ricchetti and Mike Donilon. They have been with him through the best of times—his first years as a senator—and the worst of times—the death of his son, Beau Biden, in 2015.

Already with the president and the first lady were their closest aides, Annie Tomasini and Anthony Bernal, who they refer to as ‘family.’

Donilon and Ricchetti were the ones who delivered the shocking new information that would influence Biden’s decision.

Following the debate, they released the results of the most recent internal campaign polling, which indicated he was no longer able to defeat Trump.

Biden’s decision was made soon after, and he asked Ricchetti and Donilon to start drafting a letter and to begin the process of how to make a public announcement, DailyMail.com confirmed. The president also began telling his family.

Biden had previously insisted that he would only step aside if he was shown polling that proved Kamala Harris would fare better than him against Trump or if he developed a ‘medical condition’. In the end, it was the first of those developments that sealed his fate.

It seems that the media are falling over themselves to talk about Joe Biden’s bravery and the sacrifice that he’s making as he saves democracy from Donald Trump. I’m guessing his bravery didn’t extend to informing his team or addressing the nation. No, of course not; it was a letter that was written by someone else.

America has to exercise extreme caution when it comes to Donald Trump, who holds admiration for Vladimir Putin, and Tucker Carlson, who seems to think that living in Russia is preferable to living in the US, and Trump believes he’s the King of the Castle.

Saving democracy from Trump is like saying “I will save your soul from God by giving you the devil.”

The woke media should also take a bow out of their profession because dishonest media is a useless media, and to the masses that matters.

Joe Biden has now stepped aside, but what one has to remember is that old men do not always accept that they’re too old to do some things and therefore they find it hard to bow out gracefully. He is an old man and also a human being, and this announcement is that of an old man reluctantly agreeing with those around him.

Immigration: What Do You Think?

Immigration has long been one of Britain’s most divisive topics, dominating much of the discussion in the lead-up to the general election and causing several senior politicians to butt heads, and it was the same when MailOnline went to the main immigration hotspots in the nation.

Analysis this week revealed up to one in 22 residents in parts of England and Wales are immigrants who came to the country last year.

This number, which was compiled by the Office for National Statistics, represents immigrants who are not from the United Kingdom.

The five locations with the largest inflow of foreign migrants in 2023 were Middlesbrough, Leicester, Coventry, Camden, and Newhaven. This increased demand puts further strain on housing, education, and the NHS.

But what is it like to live in these places? And what do the locals have to say on the issue? We went back out to these five locations to speak to residents about their views on immigration and the effect it has had on their communities.

Official estimates place Middlesbrough’s population at about 150,000. In 2023, there was an influx of almost 6,800 foreign migrants living there.

Due to the increase, foreigners who moved to Teesside town in 2023 now make up about 4.4% of the town’s population.

However, many are concerned that as the region gets more crowded, the hike is hurting young people’s ability to move up the housing ladder.

According to official government statistics, 6,800 foreign migrants made their way to Middlesbrough, which is home to about 150,000 people overall.

Trainee welder Dom Barwick, 19, said, ‘In the last four or five years, I have seen immigration numbers rise. I’d love to know why that increase has happened, but I don’t know.

‘It could be because places like Middlesbrough are so cheap. Even Newcastle, which is not far from here, is a lot more expensive.

‘But we can’t provide for our people, such as our veterans. Then we see migrants from abroad coming into hotels.

‘I don’t think that’s fair. I doubt the government are going to help, though. I feel for them, but we have to provide for our own people first.

‘I don’t see that happening as much as it should. I don’t mind seeing more people; it makes it more multi-cultural and that is a good thing to help the economy.

‘But this should be in the Government’s top three priorities to sort out.’

We have never had a government ask us if we wanted this in my lifetime, but we have voted for governments that have pledged to reduce the numbers. Our government has never responded to our concerns; instead, it has made a concerted effort to complicate our lives and allay any legitimate worries we may have had.

Our government should care more about its citizens, but it doesn’t because it doesn’t directly touch them. All that matters is that the labour is inexpensive, profits are increased, and wages remain low.

I have no problem with people from other countries coming to our land, but our government are not selective enough, or restrictive enough in terms of access. We are a tiny place, with not enough room. If we were the size of America or Australia, then that would be a bit different, and even Australia probably wouldn’t let them in.

The floodgates are now open for good. They come with open arms, and now it will never stop! Our government simply does not care and they treat us with contempt as well as taxing us to the hilt.

The UK is overpopulated and has a high crime rate. It is pricey, has high utility and service costs, and has a high cost of living. They have been asking people about immigration for ages and always receive the same response, but they have never taken any action and never will.

BENEFITS FOR CHILDREN

Based on the child credit component of the previously rejected Health Government’s Tax Credit proposal, which would have abolished PAYE and integrated tax and benefits, Barbara Castle established Child Benefit in 1975.

It has long been a necessary component of our lives, and everyone has the right to it—even those with higher incomes than others or those who are wealthy.

Do those in riches need this extra cash? They could get by without it, of course, but they nevertheless assert their claim because they are entitled to it.

Should the rich receive child benefits? In my opinion, they shouldn’t, and the state should subsidise the unemployed, low-wage earners, disabled parents, or those who have disabled children.

Of course, there’s the counterargument that there are too many children born into too many households. I guess we could turn all the guys into eunuchs to prevent them from having children, which would prevent overpopulation.

What our government forgets to mention is all the immigrants that they bring into this country. Nobody seems to mention the fact that they’re handed out child benefits willy-nilly, but when it comes to the British people claiming, they get slated off all the time.

The issue is that British citizens are no longer the majority in our own country. Immigrants are now the locals, and we are the guests, but they are locals now for a reason and that’s because they will work longer hours for less money and our government has taken advantage of this fact. They said that slavery was dead; I don’t think so!

Now that Sir Keir Starmer is our prime minister, you can be sure that things will only get worse rather than better. Unless Labour undergoes an immediate brain transplant, things will only get worse from this point on.

Oh, and some dentists are no longer accepting NHS patients. Very few of them are, and you have to wait months or even years to be placed on a list. Dental care is an expense that retirees who do not receive pension credit must bear.

State Pension is £221.20 per week. Out of that, some might get a bit less, and some might have to pay something towards their rent, and they certainly don’t get anything towards their dentist costs, but if you get Pension Credit, which is part of the DWP, you will get free dentistry care, that is, of course, if you can get NHS, and why is it called State Pension? You paid your hard-working cash into that. It was similar to a piggy bank scheme, you paid in with the notion that when you retired you would be paid what you paid into that piggy bank, but guess what, they spent it!

The concept of allowing the wealthy to receive child benefits is that it makes them feel wealthy and that the state is on their side, but in reality, these people have all they need and don’t need this small amount of money.

Leaving Biden Out Of The Race

Democrats are discussing a possible ‘loophole’ that can be used to boot Biden out of the presidential race if he refuses to drop out.

If Biden hasn’t withdrawn from the race by the time of the convention in August, delegates to the Democratic National Convention are mulling over their choices.

Politicians are considering a ‘good conscience loophole’ that would enable them to vote for a new candidate.

Political scientist and DNC delegate Elaine Kamarck had a Zoom conversation with other delegates on Friday morning.

She briefed them on the ‘loophole’—which would let them drop Biden if they do not have a ‘good conscience’ about their pledged choice determined by primaries and caucuses. 

Kamarck has been a member of the DNC’s Rules Committee for decades. She told the 50 delegates, ‘There’s no such thing as Joe Biden releasing his delegates. And Joe Biden gets this.’

She said, ‘I don’t know why the rest of the press doesn’t get it,’ according to the Post.

According to Kamarck, previous rules demanded that delegates vote for who they were pledged to.

However, after the 1980 convention fight between Ted Kennedy and Jimmy Carter, who was president at the time, the rules changed, and now Democrats can revolt at any time. 

Part of the rules, according to Kamarck, is that the chosen delegates reflect the opinions of those who elected them, so they could bend the rules if Biden no longer represented the people’s choice. 

‘See, we’ve never had a situation quite like this where the primaries were over. Very clear-cut winner. And yet something was discovered unclosed, whatever you want to call it, after the end of the primaries that caused people to severely doubt whether or not their nominee should proceed,’ Kamarck said.

As the group’s representative, Kamarck led Friday’s delegate call. Delegates Are Democracy is a new organisation.

‘Loophole’ discussions come as a stream of prominent Democrats are calling upon Biden to step aside from the presidential race.

Calls for President Joe Biden to drop out have gotten so close to his inner circle that some in the White House know he ‘can’t’ run in 2024 and want to give in the ‘grace’ to step down, top Democrats say.

Important members of the 81-year-old’s presidential party are in favour of a different nominee to avoid a carnage of votes in November 2024 against Donald Trump.

More than 30 Democrats have called for him to step aside and have started to make astonishing claims about his cognitive decline.

The West Wing is under tremendous pressure to figure out a way forward and is now ‘divided’ over whether Biden calls it quits, insiders say.

‘Most of them know. Some of them will say, Oh, calm down. But most of them will say, Oh, he can’t do it; just give him the grace,’ said Johanna Maska, former director of White House press affairs under Barack Obama.

‘It’s very divided. It’s got to be hard for all of them right now,’ she told DailyMail.com.

On a day when 11 House Democrats and counting called for Biden to step back, she referenced one longtime aide who called to ‘just give him the grace to make the decision himself instead of just everyone coming out like this.’

If Biden was removed from the ticket, it was unclear to whom the delegates would pledge their support.

It’s funny how people said that Donald Trump would not leave the White House, and it turns out it’s Joe Biden who will not go.

If Joe Biden is removed from office, he could still run for president again and still be elected—that’s if he doesn’t shuffle off this mortal coil before that! However, I doubt that he will be around to run again because he’s pretty old already.

Biden prioritises his personal goals over those of his party and nation, which shows selfishness. Everyone is acting as though they are unaware of Biden’s decline, even though it has been publicly known since 2020.

Hillary Clinton said it was the electorate that was stupid. Why, yes, it was!

Anyone who has eyes has seen all of this going on in full display, and it’s been going on for years. However, they believed that the public was dumb, and now those in power have revealed their horrible judgment.

Although there isn’t any evidence to suggest that Joe Biden is suffering from dementia or senility, one thing is certain: he is elderly and shouldn’t be carrying out the duties for which he was elected. In the first place, he shouldn’t have been eligible to compete for it.

This is a fact! But now they’re pretending that they just realised that he can’t do the job, but they’ve known all along, and have been covering it up.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started