Gladiator Star ‘Shadow’, 60, Is Imprisoned For More Than Six Years

A bodybuilder well-known for his starring performance in the 1990s television show Gladiator has been jailed for his part in a blackmail plot over a drugs debt.

Michael Jefferson King, known to millions as Shadow from the ITV game show, was one of four people who kept a man detained in a flat in Acton, west London, during a torturous attack lasting about eight hours.

Michael Jefferson King as a lieutenant to the plot, which ended in Aaron Ali being beaten and filmed for extremely distressing videos sent to his family to obtain payment of up to £1,000 to let him go.

At one stage, Michael Jefferson King was claimed to have ordered a co-defendant to get a hammer to break his legs after Aaron Ali tried to escape.

Michael Jefferson King, 60, a long time user of crack cocaine and heroin, was given a sentence of six years and three months after admitting two counts of blackmail at Isleworth Crown Court.

Three other defendants, so-called ringleader Simon Batson, Donna Harman, and Otis Noel, were also sentenced for their part in the plot.

The judge, Her Honour Judge Fiona Barrie, said that a conspiracy was planned by the four defendants to extract money from Mr Ali’s family and that he was subjected to a sustained and cruel attack over numerous hours, and from lunchtime until 9 pm he said he was tortured by the group.

She said that Mr Ali said he was treated as less than a human by people he knew, all for drugs and money.

King, who was born in London to Jamaican parents, moved to New York aged 14, where he entered the school American football team.

He later returned to England, where he met his wife and fathered two children before being selected as a Gladiator for the original 1992 series hosted by Ulrika Jonsson.

In 1995 King was caught snorting cocaine, then axed from the ITV show after testing positive for steroids.

He later turned to heroin and crack cocaine, lost his home and family and served a series of jail sentences.

In 2009 he went into rehab and stayed clean, revealing in 2011 that he’d beaten his habit and worked at a rehab clinic to help people suffering from drug problems, but last year he was arrested for heroin possession.

The shadow of his former self displayed no emotion as the sentence was announced.

And how life can go so terribly wrong, but at the end of the day, it’s all about making choices, and all for one thousand pounds, and a six-year jail sentence, but sadly this man is a drug addict and they get so blurred that all they can think about is their next fix.

What King did was appalling and clearly, he deserves to be jailed, but it’s also quite sad to see him end up like this, and if there’s a lesson to learn it’s that life is corrupted by drug use, and can only lead to a spiralling problem and loss.

Drugs affect countless people in many ways and this is a sad and melancholy story for a man that many kids wanted to aspire to, but there’s no aspiring to this man!

And what a wasted life – it’s all over for him now, just an old man washed up ex celebrity, and how the mighty has fallen.

It’s just a pity that this man can’t shake his demons. Addiction begins with the hope that something out there can instantly fill up the void inside, but in fact, it kills whatever is left.

Sirhan Sirhan – Who Assassinated Robert F Kennedy

The man who killed Senator Robert F Kennedy in 1968 could be freed on parole after prosecutors said they won’t oppose his parole request.

Sirhan B Sirhan, now 77, has spent the last 53 years in a San Diego prison and is scheduled to stand in front of a California parole board for the 16th time on Friday.

His last parole hearing was in February 2016.

He was originally condemned to death, but California temporarily banned capital punishment and his sentence was reduced to life in prison, with that loophole also giving him the chance to seek freedom.

Robert Kennedy Jr is supporting Sirhan’s bid for freedom because he doesn’t think he’s the man who killed his father, and in 2018, he visited Sirhan in jail and told him he didn’t believe he was responsible for the shooting.

Sirhan admitted to the killing shortly after it occurred in Los Angeles in 1968 but has maintained for years that he has no recollection of it.

Robert Kennedy Jr said in 2018 that he believed someone else shot his father, and that Sirhan was set up to take the blame for it, and that he wanted the case to be reopened.

LA County District Attorney George Gascon hasn’t indicated whether or not he will reopen the case and it’s unclear if Sirhan intends to file an appeal.

Prosecutors have opposed his parole efforts 15 times and LA County’s new District Attorney, George Gascon, is choosing to remain unbiased this time.

Gascon’s office will not attend Sirhan’s parole hearing, nor do they intend to send a letter in support of him, and Alex Bastian, special adviser to Gascon told a newspaper outlet that the position of a prosecutor and their access to information ends at sentencing and that the parole board’s sole goal was to impartially decide whether someone was suitable for release and that if someone is the same person that perpetrated an appalling crime, that person would not correctly be found suitable for release.

However, if someone is no longer a menace to public safety after having completed more than 50 years in jail, then the parole board may support discharge based on an unbiased decision.

Former Maryland lieutenant governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend said in 2018 that she supported her brother’s calls for a new investigation into their father’s killing.

Sirhan was arrested on June 5, 1968, at the scene of Kennedy’s Los Angeles shooting and sentenced to first-degree murder after he confessed, but has maintained over the years that he has no memory of the day of the confession.

Perhaps this man is innocent, but who knows when so much truth has been buried, and if Robert F Kennedy Jr and Kathleen Kennedy Townsend aren’t convinced that Sirhan B Sirhan killed their father, then who do they think did it, or has that been buried as well? And nobody’s going to let the cat out of the bag, too much has been seen already.

However, it’s all pretty ominous, and there was a lot of evidence – gun in his hand, gunpowder traces on his hand, fingertips and the gun et cetera, unless the argument is that he was brainwashed by someone else to do it.

Hundreds Of New Yorkers Descend On Manhattan

Hundreds of New Yorkers assembled outside City Hall in Manhattan on Wednesday to oppose COVID 19 vaccine mandates.

Demonstrators claimed that they should have the right to be routinely tested for the virus instead of being made to get vaccinated or otherwise lose their jobs.

In light of the extremely contagious Delta variant, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio stated earlier this week that businesses have a grace period until September 13 to begin implementing vaccine checkpoints before facing $1,000 penalties, but numerous bars and restaurants are already demanding evidence of vaccination to enter.

He said there won’t be an option of a weekly test in place of a vaccine.

Demonstration organiser Michael Kane told Pix 11 the rally was about choice, but he wouldn’t tell the local news station if he was vaccinated but called the recently imposed mandates authoritarianism.

In his announcement, de Blasio also said that every staff member at an NYC public school must get at least one shot of the vaccine by September 27, and he said that he thought that a vaccine mandate for all adults that work with children was the right thing for the city.

The mayor’s announcement came just 24 hours after de Blasio broke from Governor Andrew Cuomo and said he wouldn’t bring back an indoor mask mandate in the city.

De Blasio said last week that if people want to participate in society fully, they’ve got to get vaccinated, but businesses, unions and critics of the mandates were quickly angered, citing personal freedom arguments.

In parts of the city where the majority of people were resisting the vaccine, business owners were worried the mandates would be a fatal setback after the virus stopped them from working at full capacity for months last year.

It will fall largely on businesses to implement the policy and de Blasio maintained it wouldn’t be too different from a host escorting someone to a table or a box office assistant selling a ticket.

The Big Apple now requires documentation of vaccination for people attending indoor venues such as restaurants, gyms and shows, as the city attempts to get back on its feet. However, the vaccine mandates are laden with complications as restaurants servers, bartenders and ticket brokers at already understaffed businesses now must implement the vaccination rules.

But mindful that another economic shutdown could be unfavourable, some restaurants and bar owners are embracing the mandates as a way to manage the virus and are keeping their doors open, and there’s something chilling when a government attempts to force its people to take a vaccine – next, they’ll be putting people into quarantine camps.

And if they can force a vaccine, then they can force anything.

If the vaccines work like they say that they do, then why would vaccinated people fear those that haven’t been vaccinated – it either works or it doesn’t!

The problem is people have no idea what goes into these vaccines, the side effects, injuries or deaths that will come from them, not in the long run anyway. Everything appears to be hidden from the public, and there’s no informed consent either, you either get the jab or lose your job.

So, what comes after the vaccine mandate – chips to control people, or are they already doing that?

And the thing is you can’t sue if the vaccine makes you sick or worse, and there’s zero accountability by the vaccine dealers and pushers, which is basically what they are.

Britain Is Set To End Unnecessary Web Cookie Requests

The Culture Secretary will announce proposals to sweep away swathes of the EU’s flagship data laws which could spell the end of pointless web cookie warnings and red tape.

In what is the first post Brexit shake-up of the UK’s digital economy, Oliver Dowden is set to outline how Briton’s data can be used more flexibly.

Speaking to a newspaper outlet, Oliver Dowden said the Government plans to peel away from key parts of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, which came into force in 2018.

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which dictates how people’s personal information is collected, has been criticised for being too bureaucratic and overly rigid.

Oliver Dowden suggested the new reforms would also cut down on cookie banners, which are used by websites to secure users permission for collecting their data.

At present under the GDPR rules, sites have to give users a genuine choice over whether to say yes or no to cookies that process and share their data.

Ministers are also said to be preparing to shake up Britain’s data watchdog.

The Government is set to select John Edwards, who’s currently New Zealand’s privacy commissioner, to head up the regulator.

Oliver Dowden described the reforms as a data dividend of Brexit and said the new British framework would be more proportionate, and he added that it would help to cut the costs for businesses and facilitate great innovation which would also encourage growth, opportunities and jobs.

However, the EU continues to trumpet GDPR as having improved data privacy measures across the world, meaning the United Kingdom could trigger fresh tensions with the bloc by deviating from the rules.

The policies will also likely be scrutinised by privacy campaigners who fear further online profiling of individuals and greater massing of personal data by large companies.

Oliver Dowden said the reforms would bring an end to unnecessary bureaucracy and box-ticking but would still protect people’s privacy.

What’s irritating is that some sites make it virtually impossible to decline cookies, while other sites give simple options – accept, chose or decline all.

Most sites use cookies, but it’s not about that, it’s what the cookies are being used for, like the information that they collect about you, and the profile that you build up – a digital footprint of your life.

And of course, with that digital footprint, they have the ability to track you, your data farmed out and sold. So, what that implies is that all this data that your cookies are gathering are collecting all of your data, and ultimately it will be without your say so.

Eventually, they will eliminate all barriers, it will be a total take over by the oppressive elite, who couldn’t care less about you, and I bet Governments have much more in store for us, and it seems that we have no privacy online, whatever box we tick.

The problem is the law doesn’t go far enough. The law should be that there should be no cookies unless a person explicitly gives consent, and the default should be a ‘no’ button.

And if the information is to be used, that data should stay where it’s put and used for the purpose that person provides it for.

Welcome to the 21st century where our privacy rights have also been eroded.

These cookies track your digital behaviour (digital footprint) and numerous companies use them for many reasons because the cookies build a profile of the user and this information is sold on or used for other reasons, but it’s making a mockery of your rights.

NHS England Draws Up Plans To Commence Vaccinating Children

It emerged that the NHS has drawn up proposals to offer COVID vaccines to children as young as 12 when schools return.

NHS England bosses yesterday told trusts to be ready to expand the rollout to 12-15-year-olds in just two weeks, and health officials said that children won’t need parental consent to get the vaccine.

Britain’s medical regulator, the MHRA, has already said the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are safe and effective for the age group, but the Joint Committee on Vaccinations and Immunisations (JCVI), which advises No 10 on jabs, and is separate from the MHRA, is yet to green light to the plans.

It claims the small risk of side effects may still outweigh the benefit due to the fact young children are highly unlikely to be seriously ill with COVID.

Leaked emails reveal NHS trusts in England have until 4 pm on Friday to have plans in place for the rollout in children.

Britain’s daily COVID cases, hospitalisations and deaths have been gradually escalating for weeks, which has raised fears over a fresh wave when schools return.

All 16 and 17-year-olds are already being invited for the Pfizer vaccine and don’t need consent from a parent or guardian to get one, but only under 16s who live with vulnerable people or who have immune weaknesses themselves are being invited at present.

The Department of Health, which has asked the JCVI for a recommendation on jabbing 12 to 15-year-olds, said a decision is yet to be taken.

Both Moderna and Pfizer jabs have been linked to myocarditis, a rare heart problem thought to affect about one in 20,000 young people.

The JCVI has maintained the risk of heart inflammation still outweighs the benefit of COVID jabs for healthy under 16s, and it’s closely monitoring data from America, France and Canada which have all chosen to routinely jab under 12s now.

Moderna’s jab has been considered safe and effective and is supposed to be rolled out in younger age groups in a comparable fashion to Pfizer’s.

The AstraZeneca vaccine isn’t being recommended for the under 40s in Britain because it has been linked to very rare blood clots.

A newspaper outlet reported that NHS England’s regional offices emailed trusts yesterday to tell them to draw up the plans.

They were told to have the plans ready by 4 pm on Friday, and be able to roll out the first doses to the age group from September 6 when schools return.

However, children shouldn’t be jabbed with what is seen as an innovative vaccine, and they should be left alone, and those responsible for pushing this are nothing more than criminals.

This is about the billions big pharma are going to make, not about health at all, and if this vaccine is such a wonder drug, why are doctors still refusing to see patients face to face?

Are these vaccines really that good for us, or are they just reducing the natural immune system’s ability to suppress unrecognised viruses and their variants, and what are the real long term consequences of these vaccines, does anyone really know?

And you just know that they will go down the age groups until eventually, they will jab babies as they’re born.

Sadly, we live in very dark times with numerous people being obedient and getting jabbed. But we do have a choice, and it has to be questioned, is this information reliable or made up to fit their narrative?

The people who made this vaccine know precisely what it does and how its long term effects are going to affect us – it’s only us that don’t know.

Failing The Homeless

Six months ago, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, Robert Jenrick MP, told politicians that the Vagrancy Act, the law from 1824 that makes it a crime to sleep rough or beg in England and Wales, should be consigned to history.

It was great that the Secretary of State acknowledged that it was time to scrap the act, and abolishing the Vagrancy Act would have been a huge step towards making sure people facing homelessness weren’t driven even further from support.

However, six months on, people are still waiting, and are still being affected by the Vagrancy Act.

This is an out-of-date law and should be abolished because this 19th-century law criminalises people for rough sleeping or begging, and anyone prosecuted faces a fine of up to £1,000 and a criminal record.

Critics have said that this cruel law forces defenceless people further away from support, and people shouldn’t be penalised for being homeless.

According to the latest Ministry of Justice data, last year there were 573 Vagrancy Act prosecutions in England and Wales, the equivalent of just over 10 people a week.

The majority were for begging, with the remainder for being in an enclosed space without permission.

Crisis chief executive Jon Sparkes said the homelessness charity was encouraged by Mr Jenrick’s comments but were now disappointed that the offensive and counterproductive law remains in place, and he said that they all agree that the cruel, futile Vagrancy Act should be discarded but that it’s still being used week in, week out with devastating consequences.

He said that penalising people who already have next to nothing is pointless and just pushes people further away from support, often keeping them on the streets for longer.

Crisis campaigner Dayne Dougan was repeatedly told to move on when he was homeless as a teenager up to the age of 24.

He said that the Vagrancy Act made the police the enemy, rather than a source of help or protection and that telling people to leave town centres doesn’t make the problem go away, it just makes it more serious, and that we need to get rid of this antiquated law now so that it will make the lives of homeless people just a little bit better.

Nickie Aiken, Conservative MP for the Cities of London and Westminster, said a far better option to the Vagrancy Act is to address why people are on the street in the first place.

However, campaigners expressed disappointment after the government eliminated the withdrawal of the 19th century Vagrancy Act from the Queen’s Speech, despite saying it should be consigned to history, and Boris Johnson’s wide-ranging legislative agenda for the new parliament made no mention to the Vagrancy Act, leading to accusations his government was failing the homeless.

It comes amid concerns the act, introduced to target destitute soldiers sleeping on the streets and which includes references to carts and wagons, has been used by police officers to criminalise homeless people during the COVID 19 pandemic.

And a newspaper outlet reported how forces in England and Wales made 361 charges that led to court hearings between April and September last year using two sections of the Act that relate to begging and rough sleeping, and a letter was signed by over 60 parliamentarians, including the Bishop of Manchester, and MPs and peers from five parties, urging Robert Jenrick to include abolishing the law, saying that a failure to ensure the scrapping of the act would deal a blow to cross-party efforts to address the homelessness crisis.

Pfizer CEO Says A Vaccine-Resistant Strain Of COVID Is Likely To Emerge

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said on Tuesday that he believes it’s possible that a strain of COVID 19 could surface that’s resistant to vaccines.

However, the pharmaceuticals boss maintained that the company would be able to develop a new shot to tackle a vaccine-resistant strain within 95 days of its appearance.

Albert Bourla said that every time that a variant arises in the world, their scientists are getting their hands around it and that they’re investigating to see if this variant can escape the protection of their vaccine.

He said that they haven’t identified any yet, but they believe that one day, one of them may emerge, and he added that they have developed a process that inside 95 days from the day that they identify a variant as a variant of concern, they will be able to have a vaccine tailor-made against this variant.

In July, Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, cautioned that the coronavirus could mutate and possibly evade vaccines soon.

So-called breakthrough infections amongst people who’ve had Pfizer’s vaccine, as well as shots from Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, have occurred, although they seldom result in severe illness.

However, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada told a newspaper outlet that it was doubtful that the coronavirus could mutate into a vaccine-resistant strain.

Angela Rasmussen said that it would need so many mutations in the spike protein that this virus wouldn’t work anymore.

Other experts recently blasted a fear-mongering article warning of a doomsday COVID 19 variant which could be more dangerous than Delta.

The doctors emphasised the effectiveness of the jab against the virus and noted that vaccine makers could quickly adjust formulas to make vaccines more effective against variants.

Their comments came in response to an article in Newsweek Magazine which maintained that the Delta variant has destroyed confidence that vaccines would help the pandemic wind down.

The article read that the odds were not high that they would see such a triple threat, but experts couldn’t rule it out.

The Newsweek Magazine article seems to draw several conclusions, including that the pandemic will continue to get more serious and may stick around forevermore while continuing to mutate.

Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist warned that the next variant could be Delta on steroids.

These vaccines don’t offer immunity, they offer dependence, and a very good cash cow game plan, dependent on them for life means unlimited money for pharmaceutical companies.

Of course, no vaccine offers 100 per cent immunity against future strains, and some vaccines such as the flu vaccine are updated yearly to fight newly emerged strains but welcome to pharma drugs because curing people doesn’t make money, but keeping them on the pill or vaccine treadmill does, and big pharma is almost like a legal drug cartel.

There have been many people that have become pretty unwell after having the COVID vaccine, but there have been many people who had no side effects at all – ‘Just because something comes in a syringe, doesn’t mean it’s a vaccine.’

And to put the figures into perspective, there are 7.888 billion people on the planet, and only 4.4 million have died, but that number has been massively inflated, so no one really knows how many have died because there are numerous countries that don’t collect proper data.

Soon they’ll have a shot for every variant going, the Lambada variant and soon to appear will be the Shama-lama ding dong variant, so line up schmucks and roll up your sleeves.

Hollywood Director Spike Lee Admits He Believes In 9/11 Conspiracy Theory

Hollywood film-maker Spike Lee said he believes in 9/11 conspiracy theories, including the claim that one building in the World Trade Centre was brought down by controlled demolition and not a terror attack.

In a recent interview with the New York Times, Spike Lee discussed his new eight-hour documentary series ‘New York Epicentres: 9/11 – 2021 1/2.’

The four-part instalment, which first premiered on HBO on Sunday, centred primarily on New Yorkers and their responses to the 9/11 terror attacks and the COVID pandemic.

It includes interviews with New York politicians like Senator Chuck Schumer and Mayor Bill de Blasio, along with various health care workers, firefighters and activists.

He said the New York Police Department refused to be interviewed in his documentary due to his views on police, and the last episode also includes several members of the conspiracy group Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a group that suggested the United States government was involved with the destruction of the World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001.

When Times reporter Reggie Ugwu asked Spike Lee about the group’s inclusion in the documentary series, Lee responded that he has questions and that he hoped that perhaps the legacy of this documentary is that Congress holds a hearing, a congressional hearing, about 9/11.

Reggie Ugwu then asked Lee if he believes the official explanations for the World Trade Centre collapse on September 11, to which Lee maintained that the amount of heat that it takes to make steel melt, that temperature isn’t reached, and then the juxtaposition of the way Building 7 fell to the ground when you put it next to other building collapses that were demolitions, it’s like you’re looking at the same thing.

He said that people are going to make up their own minds, but that his approach was to put the information in the movie and let people choose for themselves, and that he respected the intelligence of the audience.

The original WTC 7 was a 42 story building erected in 1987, which was recorded plunging to the ground after the Twin Towers fell.

Some angles showed the seemingly undamaged tower collapse onto its own footprint sparked, which controlled demolition claims, but footage from the other side of the building shows a tremendous gash caused by falling rubble.

And of course, we did see planes hit the towers, they weren’t invisible, or a figment of our imagination, but of course, building 7 was the biggest clue, that came down like a pack of cards, and nothing crashed into that building.

But going back to the invisible and the figment of our imagination, well, I kid you not, there’s a 3-D Holographic Display, Touchable Holograms, Ultra-Sonic sound, but is Blue Beam really possible?

It’s not just about software, it’s not just about technology. It’s about people and making information accessible to everyone, everywhere.

Everyone is excited about technology, but Blue Beam is a holographic reality. A holographic manipulation of light from various sources to create a highly realistic, three-dimensional image of a person or object that’s not actually present.

But for years now, conspiracy theorists have considered the possibility of the powers that be, launching some kind of light show in the sky, using extremely advanced holographic projections, to deceive the masses.

The 3D hologram is a realistic image that can be viewed over a broad field of view, and now some conspiracy theorists are saying that 9/11 was all a fake, that there were no planes and that it was all a hologram, and honestly folks, you really couldn’t tell the difference, and that the reason for it was to generate fear and get support for a few illegal wars.

The reports also read that the men piloting these planes had only a few lessons, and I would think it would be difficult to navigate an aircraft directly into two buildings with accuracy after a couple of lessons unless of course, they were just incredibly lucky.

Of course, people never really expect their government to lie to them but they do it all the time, particularly when it comes to people’s freedoms, and the official narrative has never satisfied a lot of people’s suspicions of what really happened that day.

People will never forget what transpired on that day.

People saw it, but perhaps they didn’t and holograms and controlled demolition caused it, on the other hand, will we ever get to the bottom of it?

It would be damn disrespectful to the people who died if we did forget about it, but then perhaps that’s what the government are banking on, and theories used to make me chuckle at one point, but after what governments and its agencies do, it now makes you question things because anything in this day and age of technology is possible.

And if you think that it’s impossible that the American government would stage something like 9/11, then just look at Operation Northwoods.

Operation Northwoods was a proposed false flag operation against American citizens that started within the US Department of Defence (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) of the United States government in 1962.

The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other US government operatives to both stage and commit acts of terrorism against American military and civilian targets, blaming them on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba.

The possibilities mentioned in the document included the possible assassination of Cuban immigrants, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high sea, hijacking planes to be shot down or given the appearance of being shot down, blowing up a US ship, and orchestrating violent terrorism in US municipalities.

But the sheep probably won’t believe that either. They’ll just say it’s another conspiracy theory.

The fact is, there are too many unanswered questions still out there, and psychologically it’s far too stressful to acknowledge that perhaps the government and leaders might have brought down those towers, assassinated JFK and planned the whole COVID debacle, although there is some compelling evidence every direction that we turn – finally, it’s too dark to face, and sometimes ignorance is bliss.

WHAT THE FUTURE OF DISABILITY AND HOUSING LOOKS LIKE AFTER CORONAVIRUS

To all my readers out there. I penned an article last week and to my alarm, as I now understand it, the article was inaccurate. I apologise for this unfortunate blunder and have since been provided with the correct information.

Sheryl Chavez is a lady who has an extremely disabled baby son called Alister.

She had been residing in her home for 8 years in Edenton, North Carolina, which she rented. However, her lease was terminated, and COVID 19 had created a significant housing crisis in her neighbourhood, and there was an unexpected flood of people buying up every available home, which caused the housing market to explode.

Sheryl Chavez received her notice on July 24th.

Her landlord had decided to cash in on this red-hot housing market, and so did every landlord for an hours drive, and every rental property in the city has been vacated and is up for sale.

People from all over the city have been evicted and their houses sold.

There are 300 homes for sale in a city of 4,000, and one for rent, which was recently sold is now up for rent again – a one bedroom which used to rent for $450 a month, is now up for rent for $825 a month.

This is the long and short of it, and this major housing crisis has made renting impossible, and there are no homes for over an hour away, and the available ones are at a far higher cost due to the severe housing deficit.

What makes this situation more serious is that Sheryl Chavez who was a Correctional Sergeant for a men’s maximum-security prison, got injured while on duty, and fired while on workers compensation, but was refused her pension because of a technicality. The technicality was because she’d only worked for 4 and a half years and she needed to work 5 years, so was denied her pension.

Therefore Sheryl Chavez was put on extended person illness, and not workers compensation, and she was forced to fight for federal disability which is still ongoing.

Sheryl Chavez has a seriously disabled baby boy, who was born with severe nervous system damage supposedly due to a medication she was on, however, I will come back to that at a later date.

This lady is now going to be homeless very shortly with a seriously disabled baby, and there’s absolutely nothing she can do about it, and will ultimately be living in her car with her disabled son, and the state doesn’t appear to want to assist her in any way.

This is a lady that never paid her rent late in the 8 years that she lived in her home, but her landlord Thelma Halsey decided that she was going to evict Sheryl and her son Alister because she wanted to sell the property, and now she can’t afford to rent anywhere else because all property prices have gone up since COVID, and it seems that everyone is on the bandwagon, and doesn’t give a damn about another human being, especially an innocent child.

This woman isn’t looking for a handout, all she wants is for somewhere she can call home for her extremely disabled son, it’s not much to ask in today’s society, where we’re supposed to be more understanding and tolerant of disabled people, particularly children.

Things in America have now sunk to a new low, raising debate over who cares for these special needs children, and the US Government should be giving support to these children, but so far it doesn’t appear that there are any tangible benefits for the disability population.

Sheryl Chavez had made the property her home, for her son and herself, and any possessions that she has, she won’t be able to take with her because she will have nowhere else to put them, so she will not only lose her possessions, she will lose her memories as well – where is President Joe Biden when people need him, the person who spoke so profoundly of disabilities and the need to support them!

Joe Biden said that he believed that everyone should be treated with dignity and have a fair shot at getting ahead, well, Sheryl Chavez isn’t being treated with dignity nor is her son Alister, and so far, I’ve not seen anyone from the Government helping them getting ahead.

What I have seen is people blowing smoke out of their posterior, seen to be doing things to help, but not doing anything at all!

Migrants Celebrate As They Arrive On Broadstairs Beach In Kent

This is the moment a group of migrants celebrated as they landed on Broadstairs beach in Kent in the presence of shocked sunbathers.

The group of 20 people, including three children and a baby, had made the dangerous 30-mile journey across the English Channel on a dinghy.

Their sudden appearance startled beachgoers in Broadstairs on the northeast Kent coastline, a further 10 miles from the usual boat landings on the south stretch of the country from Calais.

Sally Jones Rowell and her daughter Lydia Jones, 13, were at their beach hut when they saw them arrive, one man putting his arms in the air, with the kind-hearted teen giving them crisps and beverages.

The group climbed up steps onto the promenade on Saturday afternoon.

The baby was only a few months old and one of the children were about three years old.

Sally Jones Rowell said that they were at their beach hut in Stone Bay when a boat of migrants came up on the beach. She said it was essentially young men and a pretty expensive boat, with several young children.

She said that most of them moved off in every direction, and they gave the children packs of crisps.

A Kent Police spokesperson said that Kent Police officers helped Border Force after a report of suspected transients in Stone Bay, Broadstairs, at 1.50 pm.

It comes after it was established that more migrants crossed the Channel on Saturday than on any previous single day, amid claims France has lost control of their border.

A record-breaking 828 people had to be rescued or intercepted making the perilous crossing in 30 vessels.

The Home Office eventually confirmed the figures on Monday evening, some two days after the influx of immigrants.

Saturday’s figure smashed the previous daily record of 592 arrivals set on August 12, and it also makes it the busiest weekend of migrant crossings ever, exceeding the 571 who landed on July 10 and 11.

It’s the fifth time this year the figure has been higher than 2020’s record day of 416 migrants.

On August 12, 592 migrants landed in 16 boats, 475 in 15 boats on August 5, 482 in 21 boats the day before (August 4) and 430 appeared in 17 boats on July 19.

More than 12,000 transients have now crossed the Dover Strait, one of the world’s busiest shipping routes, by vessel this year.

So far, 12,427 have arrived in 2021 compared to the previous record of 8,410 in 2020.

Sadly, we are only a small island and we just don’t have the room for all these migrants.

The French need to stop this, but they don’t appear to have control of their borders, and it seems that nothing is being done to stop these migrants from arriving on our beaches and demanding five-star hotels to stay in.

It’s hard enough for UK citizens to apply for benefits that they’re entitled to, yet these transients are coming over and manage to instantly get aid and benefits that they’ve never worked for or contributed to.

And Boris Johnson doesn’t seem to have any intention of stopping this, and it seems that our no 1 enemy is our very own government.

I don’t know what the answer is because no one in parliament, whether it’s the Conservatives, Labour, LibDem or Greens gives a damn about this country, its way of life, culture or traditions, but sadly this is what happens when a bunch of brainless gullible sheep vote.

People are already suffering because there aren’t enough services, the NHS is overwhelmed, and social care is none existent, yet we’re still taking in these migrants with no skills and no right to be here and giving them everything we don’t give our own citizens.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started