NHS Drew Up A Covert Plan To Evaluate Patients On Their Likelihood Of Survival

It’s been reported that the NHS drew up secret methods to refuse treatment to people aged over 70 in the event of a pandemic and to stop hospital care for those in nursing homes.

Classified government records were written following a pandemic training exercise in 2016, detailing strategies to stop hospitals from being overwhelmed by sacrificing vulnerable members of the population.

Under the plans, the Health Secretary could enable doctors to prioritise some patients over others who were put on an end of life pathway in the event of a severe flu pandemic, and the plans even recommended that some patients shouldn’t get any critical care at all.

Ministers have firmly denied that care homes were abandoned during the COVID pandemic despite an estimated 42,000 deaths amongst residents, and thousands of patients were discharged from hospitals into care homes to free up beds, but some believe this created a surge of infections amongst care home residents.

The records seen by a newspaper outlet show that the Government planned to triage patients based on their likelihood of survival rather than their clinical requirement if resources were stretched.

The confidential and official sensitive papers on NHS surge and triage and adult social care were given to government advisers after they were drafted in 2017 and 2018.

The records were acquired by NHS doctor Moora Qureshi who raised concerns about the health service’s readiness for a pandemic.

He filed a Freedom of Information Act to get access to the dossiers, which were initially rejected by the government before the Information Commissioner intervened and said their disclosure was in the public interest.

Working with legal firm Leigh Day, Dr Moora Qureshi passed on the reports to a newspaper outlet and accused the government of being unprofessional for not passing on the plans to medics.

He said that the Information Commissioner held that clinicians should be supported by a clear structure when designating care during a severe pandemic and that the framework required public debate.

He said that the NHS triage paper provides practical guidance for frontline workers if NHS services were overwhelmed, and why did the Department of Health, NHS England and British Medical Association (BMA) keep it a secret from healthcare professionals?

Earlier this year, it was reported that care homes were asked by the NHS to put do not resuscitate orders on all residents during the worst of the pandemic in breach of guidelines.

This might seem like standard practice for some, but this was and is a disaster, and just because you have limited resources you don’t just try to save those with the greatest chance of survival, otherwise that makes us no better than monsters.

And should we really move to a deadbeat based triage system where judgemental people based on no information and purely their own prejudices determines who lives and who dies, what constitutes living a good life and what doesn’t? Yes, let’s have these gatekeepers of good virtue determining who gets to live and who gets to die!

It’s almost like we’re preparing for nuclear war, but it doesn’t mean it’s going to happen. And in a hostage situation, the police do their utmost to save lives, but in the case of a pandemic – oh well, they’re old, they’re no use to anybody, may as well let them die! – and they call this triage, good grief.

Of course, if my 95-year-old mother were in the hospital and needed a kidney transplant and then a younger person came in needing the same, then of course I would let that younger person have the kidney. It wouldn’t be a very nice choice to make, but it would be selfish of me to give the kidney to my mother who probably wouldn’t live for much longer anyhow, and would have lived a long and hopefully good life, but that would be my choice, not some triage deciding that for me – that’s called having your civil liberties taken away from you.

Cabinet Mutiny Over Vaccine Passports

Boris Johnson is facing a cabinet revolt over vaccine passports, having been accused of denying people their basic freedoms.

The Prime Minister announced this month that certificates proving double jabs will be needed to enter indoor venues such as nightclubs from September.

Government advisers have raised concerns that such environments are conducive to super spreading and could see an enormous spike of cases later in the year, but it sparked an enormous reaction, with more than 50 Tory MPs prepared to vote against the misguided plan.

Now Boris Johnson is facing a fresh problem, with some of the opposition reported to be coming from ministers in his own cabinet, who believe the plan was railroaded through by Michael Gove.

One told a newspaper outlet that they were not happy with the government being able to use health data to cut off access to specific segments of society, and they said that this was the sort of thing that Dominic Cummings would support and that once you start doing these things where do you stop? And that they need to tread very carefully, and that there were concerns across the cabinet about denying people their freedoms.

Another added that their concern was that this was destabilising the party, and that a carrot approach was far better than a stick approach, and that they shouldn’t be taking people’s freedoms away, they should be promoting them.

Dominic Raab and Grant Shapps are amongst the senior members of the cabinet to praise businesses who’ve not permitted unvaccinated workers to return to the office, amid concerns the government was promoting a jabs for jobs policy.

Experts have warned companies doing so may face legal action, with fears of a multitude of discrimination allegations, sparking calls for ministers to outlaw such policies, and that a worker who’s forced to have a jab would be suffering an intrusion on their body, which was the advice from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

According to the group, which represents HR professionals, firms can’t coercively vaccinate their workers or potential employee’s unless legally required to do so.

Care home staff is the only area that so far is subject to compulsory COVID jabs, although reports suggest the government has been looking into other sectors too.

A newspaper outlet reported that the Prime Minister had to abandon proposed rules insisting that university students must have had jabs before attending lectures and halls of residents after questions over its legality were raised by education secretary Gavin Williamson.

We can’t have vaccine passports here for daily domestic use because it’s wrong on so many levels and it will create a two-tier society and will rob millions of even more freedoms than have now been taken away by this government.

And it looks like Boris Johnson is having his strings tightened by his puppet masters, and it just goes to show the coordinated nature of these draconian measures that has been many years in the making.

And you should remember and remember it well that governments will steal your freedoms, place your children into a life of digital ID servitude, destroy your jobs, careers, families and businesses – oh, sorry, they’ve already done that!

The biggest Increase In Fuel Bills In A Decade

Families are being warned that they should expect the biggest increase in gas and electricity bills in a decade when the energy cap is raised later this year.

Approximately 15 million homes across the United Kingdom could be affected by the decision to raise the energy price cap in October, with the average price set to rise by £150 per year.

Next week, regulator Ofgem is expected to announce a 13 per cent rise in the energy cap for half the population, with householders expected to foot substantial bills in the wake of the COVID 19 pandemic.

That decision could see the average yearly tariff increase to £1,288 for millions of homeowners, with comparable increases also expected for those in pre-pay plans.

Ofgem chief executive Jonathan Brearley advised homeowners that despite a tough 18 months, prices of fossil fuels continue to rise at an abnormal rate in a move that will ultimately hit customers pockets.

The news follows a £96 per year hike in prices after the price cap rose in April.

With providers expected to raise prices to meet the increasing cap, experts warned bills could rise by the highest amount since 2011.

Ofgem said its hands were bound on the decision because of abnormal increases in wholesale costs of fossil fuels, especially gas.

Writing in a blog earlier this week, Jonathan Brearly said that he knew that the last 18 months had been difficult for numerous households as a result of the COVID 19 crisis.

He said that increasing inflation and the forthcoming end of the furlough scheme on top of the impact that the pandemic has had on people’s resources means that family finances were tight now.

He said that sadly, against this backdrop, he was warning consumers that global prices for fossil fuels, particularly gas, were growing at an abnormal rate and that this would feed into all customer energy bills in the United Kingdom.

And that regrettably, the rise in wholesale prices would feed through to the price cap, and although the final analysis was not complete and other costs would also determine the overall level, it could add about £150 per household to the next level of the price cap.

The energy cap, introduced by the Government in January 2019, is updated twice a year and reported to have saved each household £100 a year since its inception, but in April, the cap was raised by £96 per year in a move consumer groups described as a heavy blow to a lot of homes.

And if COVID doesn’t get the elderly, then freezing them to death might!

Some people still think that the lockdowns were about protecting the vulnerable, yet Matt Hancock sent them to care homes to die.

This actually shouldn’t be happening in the 21st century, but it is because there’s a lack of investment by energy companies, and the shareholders only take the money and sweat the assets, which is why the infrastructure is disintegrating.

And what they pay the CEO’s and directors, great whacking salaries and gratuities for administration is laughable. Welcome to the world of Margaret Thatcher and the Conservatives, and all those people that voted for her.

A lot more elderly people are going to die each winter now because of this, but then, perhaps that’s the idea, and this is just another face to their democide policies, while they squeeze every last penny out of our pockets, and if you weren’t in poverty before this, then Boris Johnson will make sure you will be now.

More Than A Quarter Of Britons Worry Life Will Never Go Back To Normal

According to a shock poll, more than a quarter of Britons think life will never get back to normal after coronavirus.

Exclusive research for a newspaper outlet found 26 per cent couldn’t see our pre-pandemic lifestyles returning at any time.

The majority of those questioned by Redfield & Wilton Strategies, 38 per cent, harboured hopes that the country would be back on track at some point next year.

But the scale of the pessimism emphasises the grip ‘coronaphobia’ has taken on the nations psyche, even though virtually all lockdown restrictions have been dropped.

The survey emerged as separate Office for National Statistics (ONS) polling discovered people are still obeying COVID rules even though they’re no longer compulsory in many cases.

Between July 21 and 25, after Freedom Day in England, the proportion of adults wearing face coverings outside their homes remained firmly at 95 per cent.

Some 61 per cent said they always maintained social distancing, dropping only marginally from 63 per cent the week before.

Research for a newspaper outlet also reported that numerous Britons seem to have given up going overseas on holiday this year, amid a shambles over travel rules.

Only 10 per cent plan to travel overseas while four per cent intend to travel both abroad and domestically this summer.

More than half of respondents said they don’t plan to travel anywhere and will be staying at home, and it seems like the majority of people are fearing Boris Johnson and his crew of oddballs and ever-changing law and restrictions, than the virus itself.

And I fear that the new normal will be repeated lockdowns, jabs, continuous monitoring of our behaviour, diet and social habits et cetera, and in a couple of years, we’ll be referring to 2021 as the good old days, remembering 2019 when we had freedom of choice, when we took our own medical decisions, and when the Government were supposed to serve us.

We should all forget normal, the normal is like the Chinese social credit system, eating no meat but plenty of insect protein. No driving, no flying unless you happen to be a billionaire with a private jet, and a huge decline in population, although it’s a tad unclear how they’re going to reduce the world population to less than a billion, I’m guessing it might involve some deaths.

Don’t worry folks, I don’t own a lovely tinfoil hat, and I don’t suffer from paranoia.

Of course, nothing is supposed to go back to normal, with those still wearing masks, rolling their eyes at those without masks – just nod at them and smile, because aggressively rolling your eyes at us won’t make us appear any crazier.

And it’s nice to now see a happy face, and most people seem delighted to see a real smiling face.

We’re already a country where health and safety has gone mad, and shortly all the rules we had for COVID will be built into health and safety legislation, and the NHS and particularly GP surgeries will never be the same again.

The same will go for public sector buildings and countless shops and hospitality places – there will be rules for this and rules for that, and it’s troubling that some people not only appear to be willing to continue living restricted lives, but they seem happy about it.

And did you know that according to the Government’s own statistics 44 per cent of people hospitalised with COVID had it before they were admitted to hospital, which suggests that more than half of the people counted as COVID admission and caught it after they were admitted, but were counted anyhow and approximately 40 per cent of all UK COVID deaths were said to be from COVID, and the rest were likely to have caught it after admission with another serious illness such as cancer or a heart attack?

Approximately A Quarter Of All COVID Patients Admitted To NHS Hospitals Are Being Treated For Other Illnesses

A health service audit has unveiled that almost a quarter of patients admitted to hospitals with COVID in England are actually getting treated for a different condition.

NHS statistics show just 3,855 of the 5,021 people in hospital with COVID on Tuesday were essentially in the hospital because they were unwell from the virus. The remaining 1,166 patients were getting care for other ailments and injuries, such as a broken leg.

Daily figures on the number of COVID patients in hospitals have been released during the pandemicover-egged and have been paraded by ministers at No 10 press conferences to justify keeping lockdown restrictions in place.

But, until now, they were never broken down to show precisely how many people occupying beds were actually sick with the virus, meaning numbers included patients who just so happened to test positive.

The figures provoked critique from Tory MPs who vented that the misleading data will have been used to justify important lockdown decisions the Government has taken during the COVID emergency.

Experts claimed the numbers were especially significant and should have been collected since the start of the pandemic.

It comes after NHS England data last week revealed only 44 per cent of COVID patients tested positive before they went into the hospital, meaning many catch the virus and fall unwell while on the wards.

Meanwhile, admission rates are now slowing down, in a sign that the third wave is finally coming under control.

Scientists think that hospitalisations may even begin to fall next week, in line with cases, which have been plunging for over a week.

Before ministers pushed forward with Freedom Day this month, recently elected Health Secretary Sajid Javid asked NHS England to distinguish between the types of patients in the hospital to get a better idea of the actual state of the outbreak.

Hospitals were told to give a breakdown of those who went to hospital primarily because of COVID and were experiencing severe symptoms, as well as those who tested positive but were in the hospital for another reason.

The figures, which the NHS only began gathering on June 18, revealed the proportion of people identified as COVID patients who were in hospital due to the virus ranged between 74.9 per cent and 79.7 per cent.

It suggests daily hospitalisation figures were inflated and included incidental cases, and that in the most recent weeks, only 77.8 per cent of COVID patients were primarily sick because of the virus.

As per normal, you go into hospital with one thing and pick up something else, and it appears that if you’re unwell, the hospital is not the place to be.

Of course, our Government have been inflating the numbers since the start, and I can’t wait for their day of retribution – hopefully heads will roll.

It would be disastrous and interesting if the Government, SAGE and PHE ever correctly audited those that died with COVID and those that they said did and actually didn’t.

It’s called the ‘run over by the bus’ syndrome.

People who tested positive for COVID but then died from something totally unrelated, but still counted as a COVID death. So, how can you formulate policy and action on the wrong data?

But this was so clearly the case, and it’s disturbing that it’s only now just been reported, but then the Tories and the so-called experts over egged the virus from the start, with the help from the media, putting fear and causing hysteria from the people.

No 10 Hints State Pension ‘Triple Lock’ Will Be Watered Down

Downing Street delivered another hint that the state pension triple lock could be watered down amid concerns over COVID warping of wage figures.

A spokesperson for the Prime Minister said they recognise people’s concerns about the prospect of the mechanism resulting in an 8 per cent rise, squeezing the public finances even further.

No 10 stressed the government has to ensure fairness for both taxpayers and pensioners.

The comments came after Work and Pensions Secretary Therese Coffey raised an eyebrow by saying ministers would be driven by the data as to whether to make any changes.

The Tory manifesto committed to keeping the triple lock, ensures that the state pension increases by the highest rate of inflation, earnings or 2.5 per cent.

However, there’s been growing alarm at the possible scale of the increase this year amid the pandemic.

Economists say the effects of furlough and the pandemic are distorting the figures, and average wage increases could reach 8 per cent by the quarter to July, which is used for setting the state pension. That would push up costs for the Treasury by more than £3 billion a year.

The Prime Minister’s spokesperson said that the Chancellor had said previously that the triple lock was government policy, but that they recognised people’s concerns, and that they had to ensure fairness for both the taxpayer and pensioners.

According to the latest official data, total wage growth excluding bonuses spiked to 6.6 per cent in the three months to May, but experts think it will go even higher, and there’s been speculation that the government might opt to take an average from the past three years.

The Office for National Statistics appeared to give the Chancellor a new option earlier this month by providing an estimate of underlying wage growth.

It said the true rate of earnings increases was probably between 3.3 per cent and 4.4 per cent.

Paul Johnson, head of the respected IFS think tank, said the triple lock legislation allowed wiggle room over the definition of earnings growth and using the underlying measure would still be generous.

Treasury sources have insisted they will wait until the autumn to decide on the pension increase while admitting that this year will be an anomaly.

What the government should be doing is leaving the pensions alone and quit picking on the vulnerable. They already rob pensioners of thousands a month, and leaving pensioners in total poverty, while they try to persuade the rest of us that they’ve protected them with lockdowns, masks and vaccines – did Boris Johnson forget that most pensioners vote, and he’s doing nothing but making the pensioners irrate.

And as usual, the government are going back on their word, but I bet they give themselves a great big pay increase, and if this is the case, you may as well throw your vote away, rather than vote for the Tories.

I think there will be a lot of people who won’t vote for them again, but then you have to consider the alternatives because there doesn’t seem to be any party that’s worth voting for – they all promise you that there going to do this and that and then never come up with the goods, in fact, they just reverse everything they promised.

What’s the point of a manifesto pledge if they’re not going to adhere to it. That doesn’t exactly demonstrate fairness.

The majority of pensioners worked hard to pay into the system for over 40 years, but now council taxes rise annually to help cover the cost of illegals, their hotels, spending money, healthcare, lawyers, interpreters et cetera. This just proves what contempt the government are showing us, and what the out of touch chancellor has for the elderly.

Queen’s Lawyers Secretly Lobbied The Scottish Government For Balmoral Estate

It’s been reported that the Queen’s lawyer’s secretly lobbied the Scottish government for her private land to be exempt from a new climate change law.

The monarch, whose Balmoral Estate makes her a major landowner in the country, is the only person not expected to use renewable energy to heat her buildings.

In records discovered by Lily Humphreys, a researcher for the Scottish Liberal Democrats, the use of a parliamentary process known as Queen’s consent gave the crown prior notification of the forthcoming legislation.

The procedure, by which the government is expected to ask the monarch for consent to debate laws that affect her, happens during the drafting of a bill that’s in the stages of going through parliament.

It’s suggested in the documents, seen by a newspaper outlet, that Nicola Sturgeon’s government failed to disclose the Queen’s lobbying during a parliamentary debate to question why the monarch was obtaining an exemption from the green energy bill.

The Queen’s lawyers are said to have obtained the exemption five months ago, which only pertains to her private land in the country, specifically Balmoral and not the Crown Estate, which includes Glenlivet.

On February 3, officials working for Paul Wheelhouse, who was energy minister at the time, noted that the monarch’s lawyers contacted them about the heat networks bill, which aims to contribute to Scotland’s climate change targets by increasing district heating in the country.

The bill, which became law on March 30, also allows developers and operators of heat networks, which decrease carbon emissions through the use of insulated pipes and systems that generate heat, to compulsorily obtain land from landowners.

Paul Wheelhouse had agreed to revise the bill, saying the minister agreed to suggested amendments that would address matters from the Queen’s lawyers.

Fourteen days later, on February 17, the Scottish Government was told that the Queen had given her consent for the bill to be passed.

During a debate between MSPs over the bill five days after, Paul Wheelhouse presented an addendum that applied only to land owned by the monarch.

Andy Wightman, an independent MSP at the time, contended it was wrong to only pick out the Queen for special treatment.

Paul Wheelhouse didn’t mention that the Queen’s solicitors had lobbied for the change and claimed the amendment was needed to guarantee the smooth passage of the bill, although Buckingham Palace said her assent was purely formal.

However, this is unacceptable and the Queen should lead by example, but of course, this will all soon be forgotten because the papers and other tabloids will print a photograph of Kate in a jacket she wore before or some comparable nonsense.

Can you imagine if Nicola Sturgeon had turned the Queen down – all the unionists would have been calling her a traitor who despises the Queen, but they’ll still whine nevertheless, but perhaps it won’t be so bad.

The law of the land must apply to everyone, there can’t be any exceptions or exemptions, not even for the Queen, and that’s because she IS the law of the land!

But how far will the Queen go to protect her land, her stocks and her shares et cetera that she owns from public inspection?

Meanwhile, we the people pay tax on our income, interest earnt et cetera to help keep the Royals in the lifestyle they’re accustomed to, but if she was a mother of four, living on some council estate and living on Universal Credit from the taxpayer, most readers would be calling her a benefits scrounger, but she’s the Queen and we have to curtsey – but then it’s always been like that for hundreds of years and it will never change.

The Moment Albanian Cyclist, 23, Fatally Hit Pensioner

This is the moment an illegal immigrant cyclist fled after causing the death of a hospital worker after crashing into him running a red light.

Albanian Ermir Loka, 23, mowed down Peter McCombie, 72, at around 15 mph as the HR administrator was making his way home from the Royal London Hospital in Whitechapel.

Instead of apologising to his victim, he pointed to his damaged bike, saying to him: ‘Look at what you’ve done!’ before driving away.

The CCTV of Ermir Loka has been made public and he was imprisoned for two years, and his trial heard that he bolted because he feared being deported, but because he’s now been in jail awaiting trial for a year, he could walk free, as his time served in jail could be taken off his sentence, and he could walk free on licence.

Mr McCombie’s family said in a statement that the driver left Peter laying in a busy road, severely injured, and thought only of himself at the time, and that this kind of cowardice was beyond contempt, and that the hatred that they felt towards him was beyond words.

Peter McCombie’s head hit the pavement so hard it fractured his skull and damaged his brain.

He also sustained a fractured jaw bone, a broken rib and bruising to his legs after the collision in Bow Road last July 3.

Snaresbrook Crown Court heard that veteran NHS staffer Peter McCombie was taken to hospital for treatment, but died from his injuries eight days later despite the heroic efforts of medical personnel.

The trial heard Rebecca Guyther was walking down Bow Road with her daughter when she saw the accident and called for an ambulance.

In a witness statement, she said that the guy was pointing at his bike and saying something like, “What were you doing?’ and things like, ‘Look at what you’ve done!”.’

She said the gentleman was on the ground and had his eyes open but wasn’t saying anything, and Ms Guyther added that she saw the cyclist’s face and he seemed annoyed.

Loka, who’s originally from Albania, was cleared by a jury of manslaughter but convicted of causing bodily harm by reckless or furious driving earlier this month following a retrial.

The builder got the highest punishment for the crime of two years but could be released imminently as he’s been in jail since he turned himself into the police a year ago, and this is what they call assisting illegals.

But not all illegal immigrants cause accidents like this, and they shouldn’t all be tarred with the same brush because it could have been anyone responsible for this incident, not just an illegal.

However, London is full of them and takeaway delivery companies make no checks on their drivers, and many have no insurance, licence or any idea of how UK roads work or the law, and if they get into an accident YOU will be left on your own, and most of them ride on motorcycles on provisional licences which then voids the insurance as they need a full licence to ride for commercial purposes.

At the end of the day, a person is dead because this guy was illegal and didn’t want to get deported, it’s rather simple really. But should we be blaming him or should we be blaming our government because that’s where the burden lies?

These illegals are taking an opportunity to make a better life for themselves, which our government are allowing by letting them in.

Britain Faces Blackouts Due To The Electric Car Revolution

An MP has warned that electric car drivers could cause blackouts if they charge their vehicles at ‘on peak’ times during the day.

The Commons Transport Select Committee said owners should be incentivised to recharge batteries ‘little but often’ to circumvent shortages.

Tory MP Huw Merriman, who chairs the committee, warned that the National Grid would need to be upgraded if it was going to cope with charging during the day, and he said that unless the National Grid gains more capacity, consumer behaviour would have to change so that charging could take place so that it could meet the additional demand.

The alternatives would, of course, be blackouts in parts of the country, and he said that we can’t have a repeat of the broadband and mobile ‘not spot’ lottery which would mean that those in remote parts of the country couldn’t join the electric vehicle revolution, and to help consumers see their way to a zero-emission society, choosing to run an electric vehicle must be as seamless as possible.

Electric car battery sizes range from about 17.6kWh up to 100kWh. The average cost of electricity per KWh is 17.2p meaning the smallest models cost about £3 to charge on a normal three-pronged domestic plug versus £17 for the largest ones.

The time taken to charge electric cars varies dramatically depending on the type of charger.

The Transport Committee argues that motorists should be persuaded to charge their vehicles at times when the National Grid can meet total demand, such as overnight.

During its inquiry, the committee heard evidence from the energy industry representatives that smart chargers, which alter the amount of electricity sent to a car, depending on overall demand, will play a significant role.

The report called on ministers to work with National Grid to identify areas where the system won’t be able to cope with extra usage.

It emphasised the importance of protecting consumers recharging in public from unnecessary fees and a requirement to hold multiple accounts.

The report said that the Government must mandate that industry uses prices as a lever to shift consumer behaviour away from conventional refuelling habits towards ‘a little but often’ approach.

During its inquiry, the committee heard evidence from the energy industry representatives that smart chargers, which alter the amount of electricity sent to a vehicle depending on overall demand, will play a significant role.

This is just as bad as scrapping gas boilers – the government and its green agenda seem to be living in the clouds, and this was all due to a lack of forward planning by successive governments, and all the additional demand for electricity to charge vehicles was always an obvious burden on the National Grid, but our government plugged along nonetheless, and it’s easy to make promises over carbon neutrality without any idea of how those pledges might be delivered – what a travesty.

And we can wave goodbye to more affordable overnight prices, as everyone will be charging their vehicles and devices at night.

Most things now run on electricity at night, from security systems, ring doorbells and mobile phones charging, all connected to energy-intense, 5g Smart grid, and can you just imagine if we were ever in a war!

They want electric lines over motorways to power lorries, which would mean transportation of goods would be finished by only a few simple attacks, and becoming too reliant on electricity could be our downfall, but then that does make you question if that’s what they want.

Boris Johnson Slaps Down Michael Gove

Boris Johnson slapped down Michael Gove after he lashed out at selfish vaccine refusers.

The Prime Minister insisted he wouldn’t use the jibe and getting jabs should instead be seen as a positive thing to do.

Pointing to plans to require evidence of vaccination for entry to nightclubs and events, Boris Johnson said people would be helping themselves as well as society.

The criticism came after Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove stepped up his rhetoric despite a gathering Tory revolt over the possibility of demanding proof of jabs, with a vote on the cards for September.

Sir Keir Starmer seems to have softened his opposition to the measures by implying he could get on board if a negative test could be used as proof as well as vaccination documentation.

On a visit to the Lighthouse testing laboratory in Glasgow, Michael Gove warned those who declined to be jabbed were putting other people’s lives in danger, and he said that if you can be vaccinated and you refuse, that’s a selfish act.

He said that they were putting people’s well-being and lives at risk and that everyone should get vaccinated, and when asked if unwillingness to be jabbed should limit participation at some mass events, the minister said that would depend on which part of the United Kingdom they were in, and what the nature of the event was.

And he maintained that if a person knowingly declines to get vaccinated and there are certain venues and some events that require a specific level of safety – in terms in which a person would be able to get into those venues and those events that will be forbidden to them.

Tory MP Steve Baker said the issue of vaccine passports could create a disastrous rift in the party, but Michael Gove rejected the idea, and he said that they were going to do what’s right for public health and that he believed that COVID certification in some limited venues and for certain limited events was a way of making people safer and giving people more freedom.

But asked in an interview with LBC radio if vaccine refusers were selfish, Boris Johnson said that he didn’t believe so and that he would put it the other way round and say that if a person does get jabbed then they’re doing something massively positive for themselves and their family.

So, it seems that Michael Gove and Boris Johnson are arguing again – what a state this government is in – we need a proper Conservative Party, not one that’s being lead by a neddy.

You do have to question the agenda. Do politicians care about wellness?

Big pharma doesn’t want people that are well because they make their money from people being sick – all you have to do is follow the money, and lots of people are getting extremely rich by all this madness. Perhaps not all based on dishonesty, but they have to do something to push through a passport, curb travel and there’s climate change, and they’re charging you to control a natural cyclic phenomena – ice age, global warming, and now climate change.

It was petrol, then it was diesel, and now it’s electric and heat pumps to save the planet.

Firstly, to generate electricity, you need a fuel source, such as coal, gas, hydropower or wind.

At present, a fuel source is needed to charge and manufacture electric vehicles. That fuel source is a fossil fuel – do these people think we’re totally stupid?

One minute the vaccine works against the variant, then it doesn’t, then it does – these people change more directions than a kite.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started