Kamala Harris Frees Domestic Abuser In Minneapolis

An alleged Minneapolis domestic abuser has been arrested and charged with murder he’s said to have carried out weeks after being released thanks to a bail fund backed by Vice President Kamala Harris.

George Howard, 48, was bailed out by the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF) on August 6 after being held on $11,500 on charges of domestic abuse.

Weeks later, George Howard was charged with murder when he killed another motorist on I-94 during a road rage incident on August 29.

The victim has been named as 38-year-old Luis Damian Martinez Ortiz who was declared dead after he was shot in the chest by George Howard.

MFF’s work, which helped free George Howard to supposedly kill, was promoted by Vice President Kamala Harris during her campaign last year.

Kamala Harris tweeted that if you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.

Surveillance footage obtained by the Minneapolis Police Department captured the road rage incident that transpired near the entrance ramp of the interstate.

According to KSTP-TV, George Howard was reportedly driving a white Volvo with Ortiz in a blue BMW.

The footage showed the moment Ortiz was shot after he approached George Howard’s vehicle only to collapse soon after.

Ortiz later crashed into the centre median after getting back into his vehicle and was taken to a local hospital where he was declared dead.

After George Howard fled the scene, footage revealed him driving to a nearby gas station where he then switched with another passenger in the vehicle.

The passenger, who supposedly was in the vehicle at the time of the shooting, alleged that Ortiz had punched George Howard before the shooting occurred.

George Howard, however, insists he didn’t kill Ortiz but that another passenger in his vehicle did.

The incident remains under investigation and the identity of the other passenger is currently unclear.

George Howard was charged with one felony count of second-degree murder with intent and one felony count of second-degree murder without intent, and he could face up to 80 years in jail if he’s found guilty of the charges. Details of the original domestic abuse allegation against him haven’t been shared.

In response to the event, the MFF tweeted on Friday that they were aware of reports of the terrible and fatal shooting in Minneapolis, supposedly involving George Howard, a person the Minnesota Freedom Fund had previously provided with bail support.

Kamala Harris probably won’t go near Minnesota for years now.

Sadly people don’t have a psychic vision and have no way of knowing if someone will perpetrate a further in the future when given bail, but it does appear as though the administration is a shambles, and I’m sure this isn’t the only person who’s been freed by this fund that has gone on to kill and victimise people.

And Kamala Harris will probably laugh it off as she seems to about everything else. A typical masking method and when you haven’t got a clue what to say, smile and hope that it will go away.

If there were real media, someone would ask her about this, but it’s too bad there aren’t any with any guts. So Kamala Harris, what do you have to say for yourself? I’m sure the many readers would like to hear what you have to say about this incident.

Of course, there are some people out there that should have the right to bail, but it’s determining who those people are and what they’ve done, and taking an educated guess does not suffice.

A Variant Of ‘Mu’ Has Been Identified In Every State In The US Excluding Nebraska

The ‘Mu’ variant of COVID 19 which scientists fear could be more transmissible than Delta, has now been discovered in all US states except for Nebraska.

Florida and California have reported 384 variant cases, the highest numbers amongst the 49 infected US states.

Los Angeles County reported close to half of the California cases with 167.

The new cases, however, only reflect 0.2 per cent of total variant samples from the state of California between June and August.

Alaska previously had the greatest number of ‘Mu’ variant cases with 146. That represented four per cent of all cases recorded in the isolated state.

According to Newsweek, other US states have also shared their ‘Mu’ numbers, with 42 in Maine, 73 in Connecticut and 39 in Hawaii.

The ‘Mu’ variant, which was identified in Columbia in January, has spread to 41 different countries including the United States and is also feared to possibly be vaccine-resistant.

The variant became of interest due to its potential to become more transmissible and vaccine-resistant as discovered by the World Health Organisation on August 30. However, the CDC hasn’t shared this analysis.

Director of LA County Public Health Barbara Ferrer said in a statement that the identification of variants like ‘Mu’, and the spreading of variants across the globe, highlights the need for LA County residents to continue to take steps to protect themselves and others.

She said that this was what makes getting vaccinated and layering protections so necessary, and these were the things that broke the chain of transmission and limited COVID 19 proliferation that allows for the virus to mutate into something that could be more serious.

Dr Anthony Fauci also commented on the ‘Mu’ variant insisting that it wouldn’t be the next dominant COVID strain. He said that even though it hasn’t in essence taken a grip to any extent, they always pay heed at all times to variants and that they don’t consider it an immediate threat right now.

However, the variant has been described by Dr Anthony Fauci as a constellation of mutations that suggest that it would evade certain antibodies, not only monoclonal antibodies but vaccine and convalescent serum-induced antibodies.

The peak of ‘Mu’ variant cases was present in mid-July and have been fading since. However, the concern is that the variant will increase again in the future.

Are these vaccines going to win the war on COVID, well we don’t really know, so perhaps they should be concentrating on developing medications to treat those who get dangerously sick?

And it appears that we are getting all kinds of variants, one after the other. Is this a coincidence, or part of a plan?

These vaccines are increasingly required just so that we can have some kind of normal life, and if we don’t, then we can’t participate in normal life. It does seem like some form of control.

But even worse than the Delta variant, which is even worse than COVID 19, which is even worse than anything we have ever seen before, is the media variant.

The ‘Mu’ variant might still be somewhat obscure, and it is wrong to characterise it as the boogie man, but we should still be informed of the possible perils that are out there.

Of course, the virus is going to mutate, and the more it mutates, the more it will struggle to survive, and the weaker it gets, so hopefully, the worst is over.

But in another couple of months they will come up with another kind of variant, and they keep saying they know how to get rid of it, but the past 18 months demonstrates that they don’t have the foggiest.

Let’s take a look back. First, it was quarantining that would prevent the spread, so they closed down every business and told people to stay inside for two weeks. Then came the masks, and they said that the masks would help to end COVID, but after six months of mask mandates, COVID infections still grew sky high.

Then it was the vaccine. The vaccine would definitely stop COVID they said, but here we are and COVID is still here to stay. And it doesn’t seem like it will ever go away, it will be like the flu for the rest of our lives.

Our Homes Would Have Stayed Under The £80,000 Social Care Cap

Families have told of their suffering at losing their homes to pay for social care as Boris Johnson plans to unveil his tax invasion to fix the mess.

The Prime Minister will today brace Britain for a manifesto busting £10 billion tax invasion as he defies critics by driving up national insurance on 25 million workers and millions of firms.

The move will cost employees £30,000 a year, an additional £255 in tax, approximately £5 a week, and Boris Johnson warned last night the NHS can’t recover from the pandemic without a huge cash injection.

And he said it was time to end the scandal of pensioners having to sell their homes to fund care in later life. The tax rise of 1.25 percentage points shatters his solemn 2019 election vow not to raise national insurance.

Boris Johnson last night said the immense pressure placed on the NHS by the pandemic, coupled with the fragmented care system meant that he couldn’t dodge the tough decisions.

Cash will be poured into the NHS to enable it to run at 110 per cent of capacity to help it start clearing a waiting list that has risen to more than five million during the pandemic and is on track to hit 13 million by next year.

The NHS will also be ordered to undergo a major efficiency initiative. Ministers hope the money will clear the waiting list backlog by the time of the next election.

The proceeds of the tax increase of 1.25 percentage points will then be used to finance a new cap of £80,000 on the cost of social care, reducing the risk that people will have to sell their homes to pay for help.

Assets below £100,000 will be protected from the state, a huge increase on the current system in which people have to finance all their care costs if they have assets of more than just £23,350.

Here, someone tells of their torment of the home they lost that they would have been able to keep under the proposed new scheme.

Nancy Griffiths, 55, had lived in Kingston, southwest London for 33 years.

She and her daughter Tai, 13, became extremely close to their ageing neighbours David and Violet Edwards, always spending Christmas together.

David, who’d worked for British Aerospace for numerous years, sadly developed dementia in 2016 and died two years later aged 92.

Violet had hoped to spend her final years in her matrimonial home. However, because the pair had saved and lived frugally David’s care had been paid for privately at a cost of approximately £2,000 a week.

After David’s death, Violet, 93, became extremely frail and was moved into a care home at an eyewatering cost of £65,000 per year.

Within four years, £300,000 of their hard-earned savings of about £400,000 had disappeared.

Nancy, who had power of attorney, sadly, had no choice but to sell the Edward’s home to pay for Violet’s care.

It had originally been on the market for £620,000 but, under pressure to sell, she was forced to take a lower offer of £520,000.

Nancy said that David made everything in that house, from the conservatory to the fireplace, he even papered all the walls, and it broke her heart to sell it, and she added that she completely supported any changes to the law so that people didn’t have to sell their homes for social care because she thought it was wrong.

She said that she wasn’t Violet’s child so she wouldn’t be getting anything in the will, but said that she feels sad for people who are expected to rely on money from their parents after they’ve passed away.

And then there are those people that haven’t paid into the system and get everything for free, so what’s the point of working at all?

I mean, why would you want to go to work to pay everything out of your hard-earned money, then have to sell your home, when someone else is getting it for free, especially boat people, that come over to our country, get everything for free and don’t have to pay anything back, the system is wrong and unfair, and it’s always hard working people that get punished.

There appears to be no point now and perhaps the millions who can work but refuse to have the right idea because Britain is slowly turning socialist.

People should not have to sell their hard-earned homes to pay for their care and this should come under the NHS, for goodness sake, they paid enough into it and after all, it’s an illness that causes the situation.

I guess the argument is that why should taxpayers pay for their care when they have big houses that they intend on leaving to their children. Well, the point is, if you’ve worked arduously to get that home – the home that you probably brought your children up in, and that all your memories are in, why wouldn’t they want to leave it to their children.

It’s a nest egg for your children, or whoever you decide to leave it to, but the point is not that it’s being left to someone else, the point is that the home was bought and paid for by hard-working people, otherwise what’s the purpose of owning your own home, but that’s what the government are banking on because they don’t want you to own anything, they want to take all those pleasures away from you.

Social care should be provided by the government just like the NHS. What’s the problem? Oh, I forgot, we have no problem sending billions to other countries for aid, and sending rockets into space – silly me!

As 9/11 Nears Its 20th Anniversary

This Saturday is the 20th anniversary of 9/11, one of the darkest days in American history.

To mark the event, President Joe Biden will travel to Ground Zero in New York where the Twin Towers were demolished, to Virginia where a plane was flown into the Pentagon, and to a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania where Flight United 93 also crashed after an on-air battle between subversives and brave travellers.

This would be a sombre enough experience for any American President given that approximately 3,000 people were killed on that infamous day back in 2001, which represented a disastrous failure of US intelligence.

But now it will also be a moment of intense shame and humiliation too, thanks to Joe Biden’s shocking mishandling of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan and abject surrender to the very people who helped commit the attacks by harbouring the subversives who carried them out.

Today, the Taliban declared complete victory in the 20-year conflict that ensued after America invaded Afghanistan to avenge the 9/11 atrocity, insisting they’d seized control of Afghanistan’s Panjshir province, the last of 34 provinces to hold out against them.

America’s defeat to just 75,000 bloodthirsty medieval thugs was thus concluded, and the full scale of that defeat is only gradually becoming depressingly obvious.

The horrifying scenes in the immediate aftermath of the withdrawal were terrible enough, notably, the suicide bomber attack on Kabul airport that killed 13 US troops and several hundred desperate Afghan people, including scores of women and children.

But to rub salt on the bodies, blood and wounds, joyous Taliban fighters have been marching around mocking America by posing in US military attire and equipment, holding pretended funerals for American, British, French and NATO forces, tracking down and killing anyone who supported the US or its allies, and ordering frightened Afghan women back inside their homes on pain of cruel punishment.

But Joe Biden, whose relentless virtue signalling about women’s rights now looks preposterously hypocritical. He assured every American who wanted to leave Afghanistan that they would be able to leave.

But a newspaper outlet this morning reported that about 1,000 people, including numerous American citizens and Afghans holding visas to the United States or other nations, have been trapped in Afghanistan for five days as they await clearance for the departure from the Taliban.

So, the fate of yet more US lives, and those who endangered their lives to help America, rests in the hands of the scum who harboured al-Qaeda’s terrorists, and there’s nothing that President Joe Biden can do about it, other than hope the Taliban do the decent thing when they’ve never done a decent thing in their lives.

All that President Joe Biden was meant to be was the sacrificial lamb, and ultimately, he will go to the slaughter.

Now it’s pretty near to the anniversary of 9/11, and perhaps people are feeling extremely frightened and worried that something bad is going to happen again on American soil.

America isn’t weak, but their current leader is spineless, cowardly and extremely disloyal, and if their adversaries thought that they were spineless they would have attacked by now, but of course, they know better.

From an outsider looking in, he might not be the worst president that America has had but he’s definitely not the best.

In 2001 bodies were plummeting to the ground from burning towers, now twenty years later they’re instead, dropping from planes in Afghanistan, and it’s going to be an awkward 9/11 anniversary, that’s for sure.

There Were Nineteen Positive Tests For Cocaine And Cannabis In One Regiment

A group of nineteen soldiers from one squadron have tested positive for cocaine and cannabis in the army’s biggest-ever drugs bust.

Sources revealed that the squaddies from the 1st Battalion, Yorkshire Regiment had been taking the drugs at the barracks and their home.

The majority were soldiers of Private rank but at least one was a Lance Corporal.

A source told a newspaper outlet that this was off the scale, and that it had sent shockwaves through the Army, and that nineteen in one round of testing was a large number and raised pretty serious questions.

It was said that before lockdown, the regiment was being tested every few weeks but that this latest round was the first for quite a long time, and that these were specific cases, so it wasn’t one wild night out.

Soldiers in the Catterick Garrison in North Yorkshire had complained they were bored and had nothing to do.

The army confirmed the bust, saying in a statement that several soldiers from 1 YORKS recently failed a compulsory drugs test, and it was said that the Army doesn’t tolerate drug abuse within its ranks as it’s incompatible with military service and operational effectiveness and that Army personnel found taking drugs can expect to be discharged.

Drug use is rising in the Armed Forces, latest figures reveal, with 660 personnel dismissed in 2019 for failing a test. The number was an increase from 580 two years ago.

Of course, they shouldn’t be doing this sort of thing, it’s the rules, after all, but all kinds of people do it, your next-door-neighbour, your kids, your work colleagues who have probably racked up lines and smoked herb – even nurses, teachers, solicitors, and sports players, and all government officials should be tested as well – judges, police and the courts for starters.

Although, it has to be said that nurses and teachers don’t have access to rifles and tanks.

And I would hate to think I was in a hospital where a nurse had been taking drugs, and I certainly wouldn’t be happy to get on a plane knowing that the pilots may have taken drugs, or go into an operating theatre as a patient because I would be too concerned that this rubbish had befuddled their brains and ability to think straight.

But it also makes you wonder if these soldiers are taking the drugs so that they fail their test so that they can be discharged – let’s face it, it would be the most foolproof way to get out of the army.

Nineteen soldiers from one regiment, well that’s a record not to be sniffed at.

Although, they really should look at the reasons for these lads taking drugs, aside from the obvious ones.

I can imagine that morale is extremely low in the forces now and if need help, they’re certainly not going to get or expect it. I wonder if they will publish the statistics of how many members are suffering from having served in Afghanistan, and then we question why they’re on drugs, and if your job involved putting your life on the line for a government that couldn’t care less, you’d probably be on something as well.

And why should we be so shocked that soldiers are taking drugs, hell, even the Cabinet minister’s are taking them, so why shouldn’t soldiers?

But then most of the United Kingdom is shocking, and we have the wrong kind of mentors, all the way up from schools to politics.

BBC Employees Keep Their Jobs After Being Found Guilty Of Bullying And Harassment

Dozens of staff at the BBC have kept their jobs after being found guilty of bullying and harassment despite the corporation’s zero-tolerance promise.

The broadcaster has upheld or partly upheld 33 of 154 cases in the past two years but only one person has lost their job.

A Freedom of Information Act disclosure has revealed that an additional 105 complaints were dismissed and 16 were withdrawn.

The findings come eight years after the inquiry into BBC bullying and harassment sparked by the Jimmy Savile scandal.

But the figures show misconduct is still an ongoing problem after sources told a newspaper outlet that executives aren’t adequately protecting complainants.

The BBC said it takes appropriate action in each of the cases and the figures don’t include BBC Studios which produces much of its TV content including Strictly Come Dancing.

Since 2013, there have been 508 formal cases of bullying and harassment, 32 of which were sexual misconduct complaints.

cafter a Respect at Work review, implementing a zero-tolerance culture where people feel able to raise concerns and have confidence that they’ll be dealt with properly.

One person who’s since been involved in a case said the new attitude is more about protecting the institution than the person.

The BBC has also promised to settle claims quicker after it was accused of taking too long in the Dinah Rose QC’s report.

The corporation said it would resolve disputes in 30 days, with 60 days allowed for complicated cases, but in the past eight years have seen an aggregate of 79 days for resolution.

Paul Siegert, the broadcasting organiser at the National Union of Journalists, said that many of those accused were managers and the BBC were too afraid to dismiss them because they were concerned about the negative publicity.

And he said, that usually, those that are guilty leave quietly without a payoff, a completely unacceptable way of cracking down on improper conduct.

He added that the National Union of Journalists had been involved in some cases which had taken more than a year.

The BBC said that the BBC should be ambitious about resolving cases quickly, but that they could be complex and needed to be examined with rigour and care.

And for those that haven’t already done it, it’s now time to cancel your TV licence, but then, of course, they’ll send in an army of people to chase you up and intimidate you – the TV licence has absolutely no value for money.

The government are already considering replacing the BBC licence with a new Household Tax, which means that no one will be exempt.

Boris Johnson is a Socialist coward, and he won’t let you cancel your licence, nor will it be put on a subscription basis, and once he puts the TV licence into a property tax, people won’t even have a choice about paying it.

This is pure out and out bullying, but of course, their TV footmen will look you square in the face and swear blind that there’s absolutely no bias on their part, scout’s honour! And of course, there’s no accountability if you’re a loyal stooge of the political regime.

Of course, the simplest way to resolve the matter is to just close down the BBC, or there should be a referendum on the licence fee, and I’m guessing that the BBC would lose badly.

Meghan Markle And Prince Harry Ask To Meet With The Queen

Royal aides have been left bewildered by the sheer audacity of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle after they requested a meeting with the Queen.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are reportedly hoping to introduce the Queen to their daughter Lilibet, who was born earlier this year on June 4.

However, a source told a newspaper outlet that no meeting had been agreed upon yet and that it had left Royal aides shocked, given the pair’s interview with Oprah Winfrey only months ago.

The source told the publication that Harry and Meghan had made this offer but that a lot of people were shocked by the absolute nerve of it, and that they may genuinely want to see the Queen but it’s breathtaking given what they’d put her through.

Her Majesty’s staff haven’t answered so far, but there’s been discussion about Christmas, and whether an invitation should be sent to Harry and Meghan after they refused one last year.

It was said that the Queen is still very fond of Harry, and would like to see Lilibet and her brother Archie.

A newspaper outlet has approached Buckingham Palace and representatives of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex for comment.

Earlier this year, the Sussexes announced the birth of their second child together and announced she had been given the middle name, Diana, to honour her beloved late grandmother.

Harry and Meghan both took several months off work to care for Lilibet after she was born, and their eldest son Archie was reportedly delighted about the arrival of his little sister.

The olive branch from Harry and Meghan comes as furious palace aides are hunting for the source behind the profoundly disturbing exposure of top-secret plans that are to be enacted when the Queen departs.

The details of Operation London Bridge, including ministerial protocols and funeral arrangements, were published yesterday morning in a move described by Whitehall insiders as disturbing, unnecessary and upsetting.

The plans for the huge operation were only shared with a tiny group of people and reveals that all Whitehall flags must be lowered to half-mast within ten minutes followed by a TV address and UK tour by Prince Charles and a pre-planned memorial service at St Paul’s Cathedral for ministers that will be made to look spontaneous.

If the Queen does decide to send an invite to Harry and Meghan for Christmas, and she does agree to meet Harry and Meghan, she might lose a lot of public support.

Harry might be her grandson, but he’s done a lot of damage to the Monarchy, and the fact that they have the nerve to ask for this meeting after their disgusting, non-stop betrayal over the last two years, does make you wonder if the Queen will agree to a meeting with them, but when all said and done, Archie and Lilibet are her great-grandchildren, and there’s no getting away from that, and sometimes blood is thicker than water.

Of course, the meeting will be held behind closed doors, and perhaps she should have witnesses there, and Harry and Meghan be made to sign a Non Disclosure Agreement.

The Queen is a 95-year-old woman who doesn’t need the drama, and what she should be doing is relaxing and putting her feet up and enjoying herself, letting everyone else get on with it.

Once the Queen passes away, then you will see things come out of the woodwork, but it won’t matter by then because either Prince Charles or his son William will have to deal with all the gossip.

There Will Be A Mass Slaughter And Burning Of 100,000 Pigs

Farmers could be forced to slaughter approximately 100,000 pigs because of a post Brexit shortage of butchers to work in abattoirs.

Leading figures in the livestock industry say that the animals face being destroyed and burned because Home Secretary Priti Patel has failed to include the job on a list of shortage occupations, which would enable foreign butchers to enter the United Kingdom on a skilled worker visa.

One said they found it baffling that ballet dancers were on the list, but not butchers.

Pig farming is the latest industry to be hit by shortages of workers after hundreds of thousands of EU citizens went back to their home nations as a consequence of Brexit and the pandemic.

A shortage of HGV drivers, who are also not on the list, has led to bare supermarket racks and pushed some driver’s wages over £50,000, while growers in Scotland said last week that they had to destroy 2.5 million broccoli crowns and 1.5 million cauliflowers because of staff shortages.

Last week, Greggs became the latest fast-food chain to notify customers about shortages of goods, joining McDonald’s, Nando’s, KFC, Beefeater and Subway.

Dr Zoe Davies, chief executive of the National Pig Association, said a 15 per cent shortfall of abattoir butchers had led to a backlog of 85,000 pigs awaiting slaughter, increasing by 15,000 every week.

Just over 200,000 pigs are sent to the abattoir every week, and unless they can be butchered soon, they will have to be destroyed as it becomes expensive to maintain them.

Dr Zoe Davis said that the migration advisory committee had recommended to the Home Office that butchers should be on the Shortage Occupations List, but their advice had been disregarded, and she said that you have ballet dancers on it but not butchers – you couldn’t make it up even if you tried. A review of the list isn’t expected until next year.

The worker’s shortages have led to worries that much of this year’s yield could be left decomposing in the fields.

The most recent labour market survey by the National Farmer’s Union determined that more than a third of vacancies for horticultural workers were going unfilled.

According to the Office for National Statistics, a total of 27 per cent of food and accommodation firms have reported lower than average stock levels.

A report by accountants Grant Thornton found more than 500,000 vacancies across food and drink businesses.

Nick Allen, of the British Meat Processors Association, said that no one was asking that they return to freedom of movement. The UK voted to leave the EU so that their politicians could be in charge of the decisions.

It’s appalling to see these smart animals reared like this, and then to kill them for nothing. We should be kinder to these animals, and I These animals get killed for their meat but to kill them in cold blood is beyond barbaric.

Although taking the life of something because you like how they taste and being kinder are contradictory, and I guess it can never be kind to kill an animal that wants to live but to kill them in cold blood because they’ve got too many of them is beyond belief, and are these people paying for these animals to be destroyed?

Let them wander in the field, they could do that, but sadly for the piggies, house building and all the necessary infrastructure takes precedence. Housing is of course, much more important than the production of food for animals and humans, so this isn’t leaving many opportunities for animals to roam and graze.

Republicans Criticise Joe Biden For His Labor Day Weekend Vacation

President Joe Biden has come under huge criticism for going to Delaware for the holiday weekend amid the crisis in Afghanistan.

The president was scheduled to visit his hometown of Wilmington, Delaware two weeks ago but had his journey pushed back due to the withdrawal from Afghanistan and Hurricane Henri.

But after touring the destruction of Hurricane Ida in Lousiana, Joe Biden decided it was time to take a break back home for the holiday weekend, but the move was slammed by Republicans who called the president out for flying home amid the crisis in Afghanistan, where hundreds of citizens and allies had been left behind, due to the botched removal and evacuation from the country.

Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows tweeted that American citizens were still stranded behind enemy lines in Afghanistan, and meanwhile, Joe Biden is vacationing in Delaware, and he said that Joe Biden left Americans hostage in Afghanistan.

Alabama Representative Mo Brooks also pointed to the Americans who were left behind, and he tweeted that Joe Biden would be spending his weekend on holiday in Delaware, while approximately 100 Americans will be spending their weekend abandoned in Afghanistan.

New York Congresswoman Claudia Tenney criticised Joe Biden’s trip, while calling for him to be held accountable for the $85 billion of military equipment that was left behind in Afghanistan.

She posted that Joe Biden was a career politician who’s only ever worked in DC, but for the rest, they were responsible for the equipment that they used at work, and that if they lose it, they pay for it. Joe Biden lost $85 billion in military equipment and then left for vacation, and that Congress must hold him accountable.

Republicans also mentioned other problems that the country was facing, including migrants at the US Mexico border and the residents of New Orleans who were still left without power.

Karine Jean-Pierre, White House deputy press secretary, said on Friday that Joe Biden was dealing with many multiple crises, but she said this was the role of the president, to make sure we keep working and said that they had addressed multiple crises at the same time.

On Thursday, Senate Republicans accused the White House of evacuating thousands of Afghans from the country while leaving American citizens and allies behind.

Secretary of State Anthony Blinken revealed that up to 200 Americans were still stranded in Afghanistan even though the last US flight left the country a day before the evacuation deadline.

And now, Joe Biden is attempting to distance himself from it, saying everything went great, expecting that folks believe it.

Joe Biden isn’t supposed to answer questions, he’s just an empty suit, and he’s just a corpse that hardly even knows who he is and this guy’s got nuclear codes! But don’t worry, he can’t remember where he put them.

And to think, the American’s put a man on the Moon, but Joe Biden can’t manage to get American’s out of Afghanistan.

President Joe Biden is a disgrace with crisis after crisis during his short term in office.

Hundreds of people have died and hundreds of people are critically injured due to his bad planning, and all we have seen of Joe Biden is the bald spot on the back of his head as he walks away when he’s asked questions.

And he didn’t even answer the phone for two days while on vacation when Boris Johnson called to ask him why he was removing the military, and now he’s back on holiday while more than 200 Americans are still behind enemy lines.

Joe Biden said that no American would be left behind, and he said it many times, yet here he is, leaving Americans behind.

He can’t defend this, he lied and to everyone’s faces, and where’s the respect he promised?

Now Working Pensioners Face Paying National Insurance

Working pensioners could now be charged National Insurance for the first time to help fix the social care crisis, and Treasury officials are considering the case for extending the National Insurance system beyond the state pension age of 66 where it currently stops.

Insiders said the move would raise comparatively modest sums but would have symbolic significance as a new system to pay for the care of the elderly that’s not financed solely by higher taxes on people of working age.

Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak are thought to be close to a deal to cap social care costs. This would deliver the Prime Minister’s manifesto promise to end the scandal that sees thousands of older people compelled to sell their homes to pay the bills.

The ministers are eyeing an increase of at least 1 per cent in the National Insurance rates subsidised by both workers and employers.

The entire cost could reach £10 billion a year, but the plan to increase National Insurance has alarmed some Tory MPs as it breaks a separate manifesto promise not to increase main tax measures.

The amount of pensioners in work has increased sharply in recent years and is now thought to total more than 1.3 million.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) estimates the Government could raise about £1 billion for every 1 per cent of National Insurance levied on working pensions.

Treasury modelling is thought to have estimated considerably lower returns, perhaps a little as £120 million a year.

A Treasury insider said that there’s a fairness argument that if older people are going to benefit from a policy they should help finance it where they can afford to.

However, those over the state pension have paid into the National Insurance system all their lives, and you would certainly expect some opposition if they tried to extend it.

Helen Miller, deputy director of the IFS, said there’s a clear case for extending National Insurance past the state pension age, and she said the prevailing system already embeds a pretty significant tax break for people beyond retirement age, adding that if you were to increase National Insurance for social care you wouldn’t be starting from a level playing field.

She said that initially a lot of spending would be on the older generation and that they shouldn’t automatically eliminate them from helping to pay for it.

However, it’s shocking that older people have to work to live because their pensions have been delayed, and this is like a kick in the teeth for them, and the IFS is mad if it seriously thinks a billion pounds can be raised from 1.2 million pensioners.

And why someone has to pay so that migrants can be housed, fed, given medical care and not just for a little while, and I doubt any of them will work for years, but it seems that our politicians want every penny they can squeeze out of anyone foolish enough to work.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started