Primary School Children As Young As Five Should Be Taught How To Stage Angry Demonstrations

According to a study, more than half of teachers in England are in support of teaching children to take direct action against climate change.

The study, led by the University of Bristol, involved asking 626 primary and secondary school teachers across England for their opinions on climate change education.

Teachers believed almost unanimously in an action-focused climate change curriculum incorporated across subjects, starting with conservation projects in early primary school.

Results also revealed 54 per cent of those surveyed thought this should extend to participation in civil disobedience at secondary school.

Professor Paul Howard-Jones, the study’s lead author, said children have been motivated by Swedish teenage climate change campaigner Greta Thunberg.

Greta Thunberg, 18, whose activism has sparked a global movement, shot to fame after starting a solo school strike outside the Swedish parliament at just 15.

The study, published in the journal Environmental Education Research, found that 72 per cent of respondents were already teaching or talking about climate change with their pupils.

Lead author Paul Howard-Jones said that children had been inspired by teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg.

Professor Paul Howard-Jones, the lead author of the work, said that teachers want their pupils to be informed in how they think and what they do about the climate emergency.

He said they’re ready and willing to move forward with radical, action-orientated programmes of education that could assist pupils to drive their response to climate change.

A recent Ipsos study found only 42 per cent of teachers in the US were teaching or talking about climate change with their pupils.

In total, 97 per cent of teachers surveyed in England thought climate change was caused by humans, compared with 39 per cent of respondents in the US.

In England, 19 per cent of teachers believed climate change was more important for additional funding than science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects.

However, only 5 per cent of teachers in the US would prioritise climate change.

Professor Howard-Jones, of Bristol University’s School of Education and Cabot Institute for the Environment, added that despite being underrepresented in the National Curriculum, climate change was something many young people felt passionate about.

He said school children have been inspired by Greta Thunberg, who’s shown the importance of nonviolent demonstration to boost awareness of the climate crisis and encourage individuals as well as large scale change.

However, isn’t learning to protest brainwashing and a form of conditioning? And ultimately, the earth will burn up and become uninhabitable for humans, whether these children or I like it or not, and it’s not a question of when, not if, and always has been, it’s not a new science.

But if climate change is needed, protesting about everything won’t create the answer – people are so keen to stand up and shout, but where is the solution? Even Greta Thunberg hasn’t discovered that.

What we should be doing is encouraging children to study science and to educate themselves to create more experts for more solutions, that would make more sense surely, and isn’t it beyond human arrogance to be naive enough to believe they can prevent climate change because it’s occurred since the beginning of the planet’s existence and will continue long after humans have gone.

All that they’re doing is brainwashing our children, but what they should be doing is letting them grow up and learn for themselves, and children should be taught facts, not opinions.

Navy Destroyer Captain Was Fired For Bullying

A recently released command inquiry found that a fired Navy commander’s offensive language and insults towards his underlings crossed professional boundaries and constituted harassment.

According to an investigation that was reported by Task and Purpose, Commander Frank Azzarello, who was relieved of his command of the Navy destroyer USS Forrest Sherman in January, routinely referred to his junior officers as ‘f-king retarded’, useless and stupid.’

One crew member said in the investigation, according to Task and Purpose that one second he could be asking about your family, and the next time he would be saying that he disliked the sound of your voice, that you’re f-king retarded, or threatening an LOI (letter of instruction) for calling him too many times for mandatory reports while he was getting a haircut and that the more pressure he was under and less sleep that he got, he was worse.

Task and Purpose reported that on at least one occasion, the verbal abuse almost became violent when Azzarello raised his hand to a junior officer but didn’t follow through.

Azzarello’s lawyer Timothy Parlatore argued the investigation’s findings and accused officers aboard the USS Forrest Sherman of making up stories. Azzarello’s age is unclear, as it wasn’t disclosed in the report.

According to Task and Purpose, an officer stated, at times it seemed that he just wanted to break people down to see how far he could push people before they would break and that once he found that limit, he would walk that line.

The officer continued that there were times where he felt sick walking to the bridge just because of his nerves and what he would be yelled at that day and that his actions were rough, but it could shape you, but sometimes it would destroy people, and that he’d seen numerous JOs (junior officers) break down and almost give up, and that some people got it worse than others on the ship or just because of his mood that day.

The command inquiry was also reported by the Navy Times, which said Azzarello disparaged some officers, mocked the voices of female members and overused letters of instruction.

Azzarello, who took charge of the USS Forrest Sherman in September 2019, was reportedly dismissed from his duty on January 27 for taking home a seized enemy rifle that he planned to turn into a trophy for his ship’s wardroom without following procedure.

This is what happens when someone isn’t ready to lead, and rank forced him into a situation he was incapable of performing, and it seems like he was seriously lacking emotional intelligence – perhaps he might do better at a desk job? Because he was clearly promoted well beyond his capabilities.

These people need to be tough, but they also have to be leaders, and leaders shouldn’t be treating their subordinates like that. Leaders need to be strong, but they also need to be respected, and this guy lost the respect of his crew by losing control of himself, but there are hundreds more just like him in the military.

His mental health problems should have been dealt with before his promotion, and his language was very unseemly, and this is no way to treat and disparage subordinates – there are other ways to show and tell subordinates they’re not meeting standards if you’re a good leader, but talking down to them isn’t the way and it serves no one.

And if he treats subordinates in this way, just imagine how he treats his wife or partner? I guess that he might be treating them worse, and it makes you question if there have been any reports of Family Advocacy for domestic violence because people who browbeat their subordinates might be doing terrifying things at home.

Five-Year-Olds Are Having Panic Attacks

It was claimed that children as young as five are having panic attacks about meeting their friends for playdates following repeated lockdowns.

An additional 1.5 million children will need mental health treatment in the wake of COVID, with NHS bosses warning of an eruption of locked in trauma.

Some young children have been left increasingly worried and even frightened to leave their home, and waiting times of up to four years for NHS help has driven some families to turn to private psychologists for help, but they’re also oversubscribed and unable to take more patients.

Some said they’re taking twice as many calls from parents as normal and are being made to use waiting lists or turn away patients.

It comes after the Royal College of Psychologists warned that the pandemic could create a lost generation who will be affected by enduring mental illness.

Data from the college revealed the number of children already referred for mental health support increased to almost 400,000 over the last year, an increase of 28 per cent since the previous year.

Predictions seen by a newspaper outlet show that 1.5 million additional children and young people will require mental health support in the next three to five years as a direct consequence of the pandemic.

The Centre for Mental Health calculations inferred demand will be as much as three times the capacity of mental health services.

NHS England’s director for mental health Claire Murdoch explained the pandemic has turned young people’s lives upside down, and Dame Rachel De Souza, Children’s Commissioner for England, said a study of more than 550,000 children will show mental health this generation and will be of the greatest concern.

At a meeting of NHS Confederation, a membership body for organisations that commission and implement National Health Services, she talked of her experience talking to children about the impact of the lockdown.

A senior health person told the meeting that their five-year-old was housebound because she was too frightened to go away from the house, never mind the school.

Another said her daughter was now undergoing counselling after she had a panic attack about going to a play date, and Dame De Souza said that she’d been around the country and had seen those sad little faces, putting their arms around their friends as they told her about having their trauma from losing a grandparent, and not being able to go to their funeral.

It’s pretty comparable to children in war-torn countries and how they cope, well they don’t, and neither will our children now, and they will need lots of counselling.

At such a young age, children are extremely susceptible to disruption caused by schools constantly opening and closing, and it’s quite confusing for them, but sadly, it’s been impossible to shield them from that.

And our children have been a casualty of this Government’s psychological warfare on its citizens.

It’s bad enough that they’ve used behavioural psychologists in SAGE to scare people into compliance, but the harm they’ve done to small children is beyond sickening, and the mental torture this country has suffered at the hands of this government needs addressing right now because these children have had a culture shock, and it’s pretty sad.

But it’s not unexpected and it was bound to have a knock-on and long term impact because children saw no one but their parents for nearly 2 years, so they’re bound to be afraid in social situations now.

Jamie Oliver Drops Term Kaffir Lime Leaves

Jamie Oliver will no longer refer to Kaffir lime leaves in his recipe books or TV shows following concerns that the term has historically been used as a racial slur in South Africa, his representatives announced.

The TV chef will instead refer to them as lime leaves going forward, with his team now reviewing old content and already editing out prior references to the word Kaffir in online recipes to circumvent offending people.

A source close to Jamie Oliver said this morning that he could confirm that they were also making the switch to lime leaves and wouldn’t be using the term going forward and that historical recipe content would be reviewed accordingly.

The word Kaffir has already been removed from Jamie Oliver’s online recipe for quick chicken laksa, having been present in the wording last Friday, but it remains for his Thai green, Balinese chicken and Malaysian beef curries.

It comes after Tesco joined an increasing number of British supermarkets to change the name of its Kaffir lime leaves, saying it stands against racism and discrimination and has begun the process of modifying the product labels.

Waitrose was the first store to announce it would be dropping the word from its Cooks’ Ingredients products last week, saying they will be relabelled as Makrut Lime Leaves in response to customer criticisms they received.

The new packaging of the dried lime leaves, which are a prevalent ingredient in South East Asian food, will be rolled out to all stores and Waitrose by early next year.

Tesco then confirmed they would be following suit, telling a news outlet that they stand against racism and discrimination of any kind. Along with other retailers, that have begun a process of changing the name of their lime leaves.

Although the company didn’t have a date for when this would come into force, the retailer said it was working with suppliers to make the transition as quickly as possible.

Sainsbury’s and the Co-Op also said last week that they were now in the process of updating the names of the leaves on their food packaging.

The Co-Op said it has a zero policy on racism and the use of any racial slur words as it confirmed it would be modifying any descriptions of the leaves on its packaging.

Waitrose grocery trading manager Helena Dennis said that this name change was a crucial step in recognising how important it was for them to listen to customers and educate themselves when it came to the language they use.

We have become so fixated with what wording we use on various things that it’s become absurd – it’s just a word, or a phrase that people sometimes use for different things, sometimes it’s not meant to be offensive and other times it is, but really at the end of the day, it’s just a word – I mean will we now have to change the term kidney beans in case our renal system gets upset?

This is yet another thing to trigger everyone in the United Kingdom who are sick of being perpetually offended on behalf of other mobs, but it never bothered anyone, until one wokeful nincompoop pointed it out, and if I could post an emoji, it would be the one rolling its eyes.

And why is everyone so easily triggered over something that seemingly won’t affect your life, even a tiny bit? And can no one see how thick-witted this appears to the rational?

Boris Johnson Warns Of Rough Winter Ahead

Boris Johnson poured cold water on the possibility of easing the remaining coronavirus rules early as he declined to rule out future lockdowns and warned the country should brace for a rough winter.

The Prime Minister has suspended freedom day by four weeks to July 19 but a two-week review will take place on July 5 to see if the return to normal can be pushed forward.

Boris Johnson struck a negative tone during a visit to a laboratory in Hertfordshire as he said Delta variant cases, hospitalisations and admission to intensive care were still climbing and the country must therefore be wary.

But he maintained that it was looking great for the rules to be lifted at the terminus point of July 19, as he said the vaccination rollout was going gangbusters.

Nevertheless, Boris Johnson refused to rule out reimposing draconian restraints later in the year as he warned some new horror could surface which they simply hadn’t planned for.

The Prime Minister’s intervention came after Matt Hancock confirmed Israeli-style proposals to scrap travel quarantine rules for fully vaccinated Britons that could shortly come into force, reinforcing hopes that summer holidays abroad could still be saved.

The Health Secretary said ministers were working on loosening restrictions for double jabbed adults and their children, which could see the prevailing compulsory 10-day self-isolation from amber to red list countries succeeded with daily COVID tests.

But he said Number 10 couldn’t push forward with the plan for 31.3 million Britons just yet because they’re waiting for experts to investigate data from a pilot project to see if it will be effective.

Matt Hancock announced that he believes progress will be made shortly, with sources saying widespread family holidays abroad may be back on from August.

The Health Secretary told BBC Breakfast that they weren’t ready to be able to take that step yet, but it’s something that he wanted to see and that they will introduce, subject to clinical information, as soon as it’s reasonable to do so.

Tory MPs, hospitality chiefs and travel bosses are all hopeful that the Prime Minister will expedite the nation’s departure from lockdown, but Boris Johnson seemed to infer that was questionable as he painted a sombre panorama of the scope of the Delta variant.

Questioned on whether he would bring forward freedom day, he said that the vaccination rollout was going gangbusters and loads of people were coming forth now for their second jabs.

However, easing restrictions means people will leave the country, and it seems that the government’s strategy is to prevent the British people from spending money elsewhere, but if that is true, that might be an advantage to the United Kingdom, only time will tell, but I fear that the good old days of normalcy are gone.

Hopefully, Boris Johnson will regain his sanity when it’s pointed out that a winter lockdown will slaughter what’s left of this country. Surely, there’s no way he could contemplate financing another lockdown.

Furthermore, I wonder if there’s any chance of the Prime Minister spending a day in Downing Street, actually running the country, instead of swanning around playing dress-up? But perhaps that’s because he’s a showman and not a leader, and if people can’t see through him, then we’re doomed.

We can go to a football match where there are thousands of other people, but you can’t sing and dance at a wedding – so no real restrictions there. I’d rather live in a land that was governed by logic and reason rather than experience repeated gaslighting from our government.

Theory Of Errorlution

It’s the diagram of evolution we’re all familiar with, beginning with an ape figure which gradually turns into an upright human, but the famous depiction of the history of man should be erased from the record of everything, according to an expert.

Dr Adam Rutherford, a geneticist at University College London, said the diagram depicts wronger information about evolution than anything else, and he claims it should be removed from biology books.

Talking at the Cheltenham Science Festival, he maintained the picture of a series of men starting with a monkey who gradually got more upright to a white person with a beard was damaging for understanding the science of evolution.

He added that it indicates a directional elegance and intelligence and that it was from a textbook in 1965, and if he had one wish he would erase it from the record of everything.

The original picture, named The Road to Homo Sapiens, starts with Pliopithecus, a 22 million-year-old ancestor of the gibbon family, and it portrays 14 other primate figures, concluding with the modern man – a simplified version is also extensively circulated.

Dr Rutherford said the picture points to the notion that evolution has a direction, and it infers that there are ape-like ancestors that start to walk upright and eventually become us and it goes in a very nice, neat line.

He said that this isn’t how evolution works at all and that we evolve to occupy whatever environmental niche we’re in at that time, and that we could quite easily in the future evolve into a different shape or back to being quadrupedal, walking on all fours, and that was just how evolution worked, and the belief that evolution improves wasn’t correct.

He said that all organisms, from a human on the plains of Africa to a small insect, have adapted to survive in their environment, and that it was a real human, hubristic point of view, that we think of ourselves as the pinnacle of evolution.

Dr Rutherford said the fact the diagram was still broadly circulated wasn’t the biggest crime in the world, but it’s misinformation, and that it also implies we know the route of evolution, and he continued that aside from the relationship between Neanderthals and us, which is that they were our ancestors, we don’t really know what our ancestors were.

But does it matter? We are what we are and have become what we have become, but could he be right because when you think about it, the famous sequence diagram is far too simplistic, and perhaps the truth is far more complicated than scientists used to believe.

But then perhaps it’s supposed to be simplistic so that the average person understands the basics of evolution, and as for evolving in their own environment, it just makes common sense, you see it all the time in nature.

And Dr Rutherford might be right about the image, so perhaps he should come up with his own illustrations, and there might be all sorts of things wrong with the theory because at the end of the day it’s just Pandora’s box.

This is just a massively simplified depiction of evolution, and the picture is just making a simple point and nothing more, but shouldn’t we be living in the here and now and not in the past, and should we not be more concerned about today and the future of humanity?

Theory is the hypothesis based upon the simplicity of the topic under debate, and that’s why scientists are always seeking more supportive evolution, and so yes, many generally believe theories are full of flaws.

Schools Are Using Scrapped GCSEs Excuse To Send 500,000 Students Home

More than half a million youngsters have been permitted to leave school before the end of the educational year, despite grave concerns over months of lost learning during the lockdown.

According to education campaigners, Year 11 pupils in most state secondary schools in England and Wales have not returned to school after half term in May.

Usually, these students, aged 15 and 16, would be sitting GCSEs this month and be on study leave in between exams, but because regular exams have been replaced by teacher assessments, pupils could have remained in school to catch up on work missed throughout the pandemic.

Instead, headteachers called an early halt to the educational year, giving Year 11 more than six weeks off before the official end of the summer term.

Dr Julie Maxwell, of campaign group the Family Education Trust, said, it was extremely worrying that young people that age had been chucked out of school early, and that without the safeguarding of school, they could end up, through boredom, falling into activities such as underage drinking and drug-taking.

The move to send students home comes despite teachers, heads and unions protesting that the Government’s 1.4 billion catch up pot for students suffering from the disruption to their education was not enough, and critics said schools were wasting a golden opportunity to help youngsters recover.

Professor Alan Smithers, from Buckingham University, said that it smacks of double standards, and he said that schools were effectively ditching Year 11, who are arguably amongst the worst hit by the lockdowns, while at the same time demanding more money to help students catch up on what they’ve missed.

Chris McGovern, chairman of the Campaign for Real Education, said that the majority of schools appear to have already paused learning for Year 11 and that the move was breathtaking in its selfishness.

Amanda Spielman, the head of Ofstead, said the sending home of Year 11 pupils was concerning, and the watchdog will want to know how schools were using the remainder of the term to help Year 11 pupils get up to speed on the education they missed out on.

The action of numerous schools in England and Wales is in stark contrast to what’s occurring in Scotland, where the year group has been required to return to school after half term.

A majority of headteachers have chosen to keep their Year 11 students in school, saying education isn’t just about a set of grades.

And it now appears that the long summer holidays aren’t enough for staff anymore, and it’s pretty sad for the pupils, but the teachers will be thrilled, more money for doing nothing.

Numerous schools ceased in May half term, but it’s absurd the amount of time that they’ve lost – a year lost of education, and numerous students were told by email from their school not to return after half term. Thankfully some pupils have been able to get some work experience, but many have not.

Not only that, numerous students didn’t have a chance to say goodbye to their teachers, and maybe some have done their exams, but the next stage could be for the next stage of their lives, teaching children life skills, and how to handle money, or being in the workplace et cetera.

And I feel sad for this year and last years school leavers, because one of the measures is being able to cope under pressure and how well they’ve studied for such exams, and there’s been no measure of this for pupils for these two years.

And now, essentially, you won’t know who you’ll be getting in the workplace, a methodical well planned academic type or someone who just wings it, and it’s a genuine shame.

Harry And William Call A Truce For The Unveiling Of Diana Statue

Royal biographers have said that Prince William and Harry will put their differences aside to attend the unveiling of a new statue of their mother next month after communicating with minimal texts.

The unveiling of a new statue of Diana, the Princess of Wales, could help thaw frosty relations between her sons who are both due to be at the July 1 ceremony in the gardens of Kensington Palace.

The princes will walk together to unveil the statue they commissioned to mark what would have been their mother’s 60th birthday before giving their speeches.

Sources claim that it will be the first time the pair reunite since Prince Philip’s funeral in April. The pair have failed to reconcile since the Harry bombshell interview with Ophrah Winfrey in March.

A source told a news outlet that Harry and William have only communicated by text since the Duke of Edinburgh’s funeral, but there have not been any personal chats or proper talks, only a very brief and minimal exchange of text messages, and it was said that the relationship was still pretty much difficult and there was no indication yet that there will be any kind of coming together any time soon.

And a news outlet reported that the news comes as it was revealed that Buckingham Palace could delay publishing the results of its inquiry into allegations that the Duchess of Sussex browbeat royal staff until next year.

A senior Palace aide had accused Meghan of unacceptable conduct towards two personal assistants and undermining the confidence of a third, claims the Sussex’s have robustly dismissed as lies.

The palace brought in an external independent legal firm to carry out the inquiry which has been underway for three months and was due to be published in the annual Sovereign Grant report this week, but Buckingham Palace refused to comment.

Omid Scobie, a journalist and writer whose 2020 book ‘Finding Freedom’ covers Harry and Meghan’s marriage and move to the United States, said he expects the unveiling of the statue will demonstrate that both of them can be polite and considerate when it comes to remembering the life of their mother, despite their differences.

The once close brothers, who studied together at Britain’s elite Eton school, and both served in the military, have become distant since Harry’s marriage to Meghan and the couple’s move to California.

But it’s not like the two brothers are at loggerheads, and they will show solidarity on the day, it’s their mother, and nothing will change that, and who cares – it’s a public-funded soap opera and an embarrassment to the country.

However, this is important to both of the brothers, and it should be respected whatever their story – it might even unite them again, like these things often do, and their wives should back off on this one because this will be a pretty emotional moment and it’s not their moment.

The fact is two brothers not talking, it happens in numerous families, but the Royal Family must be one of the most attention-seeking family’s of the lot, but because they’re the most high profile family in the land, they seem to attract the most attention.

Princess Diana would have been heart sore about all of this, and perhaps Harry and Meghan were badly informed all along the way, that’s if their grievances are justified, you shouldn’t bring your family down to outsiders, let alone the world, people just don’t respect that, and the only ones that profit from the estrangement are the so-called friends, lawyers and hangers-on.

Smartwatch Data That Shows How Greek Pilot Killed Caroline Crouch

Data taken from murdered British mother Caroline Crouch’s smartwatch revealed her pulse soared 50 per cent at 4.05 am as her husband suffocated her with a pillow.

Babis Anagnostopoulos, 33, admitted killing 20-year-old Caroline Crouch in a fit of rage after she threatened to divorce him and take their baby daughter Lydia with her.

A doctor told a coroner during the inquest into her death that Caroline Crouch died in pain as Babis smothered her with a pillow for five minutes.

Babis said he panicked when he saw she was dead and once he realised hiding her body wasn’t an option, he staged a fake burglary because he wanted to raise their daughter out of jail.

Data from Caroline Crouch’s smartwatch thwarted Babi’s deceit, as it revealed she died hours before she was supposedly killed by robbers. Now it’s been determined she was suffocated for five minutes after she was attacked while she was sleeping.

The coroner’s report stated according to Greek media site Amna that at 3.58 am, a few minutes before her pulse abruptly increased at 4.05 am, the mother of one’s heart rate indicated a person who was fast asleep.

Doctors said that at 04.05 her pulse rose abruptly by 50 per cent up from a state of sleep and that it was believed at that time the person was in an extreme state of mental or physical stress. They concluded the death process took place from 04.05 am to 4.11 am.

It was previously reported that black belt kickboxer Caroline Crouch fought her husband before she died.

In police interviews, Babis maintained the British mother was aggressive, telling police that they couldn’t imagine his love for this girl, and he claimed that Caroline threw the child in the crib and hit him, causing him to lose his temper on the night she was killed.

Harrowing diary entries made by Caroline, which form part of a 26-page police file, paint a picture of a violent and troubled marriage, with her promising to leave him at several points.

Greek media reports said that Babis also told police he killed the couple’s dog to make the robbery ruse more believable because no one would have thought that he could hurt a dog.

Neighbours recalled hearing the animal, a seven-month-old husky puppy, crying at the time, but not barking, which alarmed them.

It’s astounding how a smartwatch can come in so handy when finding a criminal. Perhaps the watch company may use this incident in their next advert.

However, this was a cold-blooded, premeditated, planned murder, and now the poor child has no mother, and when he did decide to come clean about it with the police, he still wasn’t exactly truthful and tried to say he killed her accidentally during self-defence. He didn’t, he killed her in her sleep, the smartwatch and the fact he disabled the CCTV shows that it was intentional.

But envision a future where all information is digitally tracked and linked to ID – things like this will be routine for investigations, but why not, science and technology caught this killer out, and it’s a good job that the police took the time to look at the smartwatch and the monsters phone so thoroughly.

And perhaps this man might not have been caught out if this evidence hadn’t existed, and he wouldn’t have confessed, and the police would have still been chasing a band of criminals who didn’t exist, and we should be pleased just once that tech got one over on the bad guy.

Hopeless Matt Hancock

Matt Hancock has been accused of neglecting to tell the Prime Minister about a major report with hopeful conclusions about vaccine effectiveness against the Indian COVID variant at a crucial meeting before ministers chose to delay lifting restrictions.

The claims in a newspaper outlet pile more pressure on the beleaguered Health Secretary after axed Number 10 advisor Dominic Cummings revealed that Boris Johnson had branded his response to the pandemic as hopeless.

Questions about the effectiveness of vaccines in stopping COVID hospitalisations caused by the Indian strain were at the heart of the minister’s decision last week to delay Freedom Day until July 19.

That decision was taken after a gathering of the quad of Boris Johnson, Chancellor Rishi Sunak, Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove and Matt Hancock on June 13, but critics now claim that the data proves the decision to delay wasn’t needed and argue that Freedom Day should be brought forward to July 5 because, they suggest, surging coronavirus cases won’t result in a surge of hospitalisations that would overwhelm the NHS.

The Health Secretary is believed to have known about a study produced by Public Health England (PHE) into the AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines on June 10.

The data in the report notes that the two vaccines were more effective at preventing hospitalisations from the now dominant Indian variant than with earlier strains.

PHE also gave a written report on the data which they sent to Matt Hancock on June 12, but the information wasn’t shared with the Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak or Michael Gove during their meeting on Sunday that led to the postponement of June 21.

Sources told a news outlet that the study wasn’t even included in briefing papers at the meeting.

Cabinet minister Robert Buckland swatted away allegations that Matt Hancock withheld the important information, telling Trevor Phillips on Sky News that sadly he was afraid that report was wrong. He also criticised calling Matt Hancock hopeless after Boris Johnson’s damaging messages about the Health Secretary were revealed by Dominic Cummings, adding that to bandy around words like that doesn’t do anybody any service at all, and it was said that he’d been a most valuable and effective Health Secretary who enjoyed their full support.

Reminded that they were the Prime Minister’s words, Robert Buckland said that he wasn’t going to get into text messages or WhatsApp message sent between people and then disclosed in a somewhat unfortunate way.

But seriously folks, it’s a bit like Hancock’s half-hour – another one who appears to be enjoying this crisis and the limelight.

But Boris Johnson is complicit also because they’re both parroting the World Economic Forums slogan “build back better”, as are Joe Biden and Justin Trudeau – the World Economic Forum who eagerly predict that in the near future, you will own nothing and you will be happy, and yet they will own everything.

Boris Johnson is an amateur – he’s a chancer always looking for the next bandwagon to hop on, and what we must remember is that Boris only cares about Boris.

Matt Hancock is incompetent and Boris Johnson knows this but Matt Hancock is there to take the fall while Boris Johnson slides away blaming others for his actions, and Matt Hancock is undoubtedly the most obnoxious, nasty, bullying and inept politician to infest parliament, but in the meantime, it’s drinks, barbecues and good times all around and they’re laughing us and our compliance.

And the etymology of Matt Hancock’s name is synonymous with how he’s treating the public – with his c*ck in his hand, taking the p*ss out of the public with his dismissal performance.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started