World’s Most Northerly Island Is Discovered By Accident

A team of Arctic researchers believe they’ve stumbled across the world’s most northerly island.

The Danish scientists had been intending to travel to Oodaaq, which lies off the northern coast of Greenland, and previously held the title of the northernmost island, but instead, they wound up on an obscure piece of land even further north and realised only when island enthusiasts pointed it out to them on social media.

Expedition leader Morten Rasch, from the University of Copenhagen, said that they were convinced that the island they were standing on was Oodaaq, which until then was listed as the world’s northernmost island.

However, when photos were posted of the island and its coordinates on social media, several American island hunters went crazy and said that it couldn’t be true.

The island, which may have been formed after a major storm, is half a mile north of Oodaaq and consists essentially of small mounds of silt and gravel.

The university said that it measures just 100 feet by 200 feet and rises to 13 feet above sea level.

The team hope to call it Qeqertaq Avannarleq – Greenlandic for ‘the northernmost island.’ And they added that the island may disappear when another storm hits.

I just hope they leave it alone because it seems that whatever is found, humans have got to take it over.

And apparently, a new island has been identified in the Antarctic, which is deemed to be melting, and sea levels increasing, with land being submerged as a result – I wonder how that works. But it’s okay, a new island has been discovered, so all is good. Better be careful though because someone will have their eye on it – perhaps it will become Santas new base station!

But of course, this discovery was brought to us by global warming.

Internet Trolls Are Just As Mean In Real Life

According to a new study, internet bullies are just as mean in real life.

The study, from the political science department at Aarhus University, demystifies the long-held hypothesis that people are only nasty while posting anonymously online.

And according to a study published in the American Political Science Review, it also found that nice people may wish to circumvent all political debates online, whether the forums are antagonistic or not.

The researchers did discover that the hostility levels of online political debates were worse than offline discussions, but that the frequency of behaviour was about the same online and in real life.

Michael Bang Peterson, the professor who co-authored the study, told the magazine Engineering & Technology that the behaviour of an internet troll was much more noticeable than the behaviour of the same person offline.

Michael Bang Peterson told the magazine that their research revealed that the reason many people feel that online political debates are so antagonistic has to do with the visibility of aggressive behaviour online.

The researchers began the paper with an apparent dig at Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who was named the Time Magazine ‘Person of the Year’ in 2010.

The Time Magazine piece on Mark Zuckerberg reads, as cited by the researchers that Facebook wants to populate the wilderness, tame the howling mob and turning the lonely, antisocial world of random chance into a friendly world.

The researchers noted that efforts from social media titans to get people to engage in civil debates on subjects such as politics have flopped spectacularly.

The researchers wrote that online discussions about politics turned out to be nasty, brutish and not nearly short enough.

The researchers cited a 2017 Pew Research Centre survey which found that 62 per cent of Americans thought online harassment had become a significant problem for the country.

The researchers wrote that there seems to be a hostility gap where online discussions were felt significantly more antagonistic than offline discussions.

While conducting their study, the researchers considered the mismatched hypothesis, one of the most common theories in academic discussion about online hostility.

The mismatch hypothesis speculates that otherwise agreeable people can turn into nasty trolls when they can’t physically see the person with whom they’re arguing.

Alexander Bor, a post-doctorate researcher who co-authored the study, tweeted about the results of the study.

He tweeted that the people that are hateful on Twitter offend others in face to face discussions too.

People post on social media all the time and don’t use vulgarity or confrontational language of any kind, but others will be on them like a deranged pack of wolves, attacking that person’s intellect, their character and sometimes even their family. And it’s remarkable the speed and viciousness with which they will attack.

A lot of people don’t like to accept that a large number of people are bad. It has never made any sense to blame the internet for their behaviour. Nice people are in the minority.

Unfortunately, trolls are usually people who have an opinion on everything, and they take it out on the keyboard, lurking behind a screen, but what we should remember is never to feed them because they’re like gremlins and the more you feed them, the more they propagate, and sadly, media makes people believe that they’re important.

But maybe it’s because we’re very near death of free speech, so the only outlet left is to voice their frustration, and it’s no surprise people have become bitter and discouraged by all this madness, which they just inflict on other people who just want to get on with their lives.

California Teacher Sparks Outrage

A California high school teacher is being investigated by the school board after she admitted she’d got her pupils to pledge allegiance to the gay pride flag instead of the American one.

Kristen Pitzen, of Newport Mesa School District in Orange County, posted a video to TikTok, where she admitted she’d removed the American flag because it made her uncomfortable.

When one of her English class pupils pointed out it was missing during the Pledge of Allegiance, she told them to recite the pledge to the only flag she did have hanging in her classroom, the gay pride flag.

The TikTok has since gone viral, sparking a backlash from numerous parents who were incensed she was teaching children to disrespect the American flag.

One user replied, how can the words for liberty and justice for all bring such hate in people. How can anyone have an issue with those words? Some even questioned why she even lives in America, calling on the school to fire her and for parents to homeschool their children.

However, some parents even went as far as to say they wished she taught their children.

In the controversial TikTok, Pitzen revealed that the Pledge of Allegiance is reading during third-period announcements, and she said that she always tells her class, stand if you feel like it, don’t stand. Say the words if you want, but you don’t have to say the words.

She said, so in her class, if you choose to stand but not say the words, that’s fine, and Pitzen added that her room doesn’t have a flag, as she pivots to the camera and points to the wall in the front of the classroom where the flag used to be, and she said, whispering that she did it because it made her uncomfortable, and took it down during COVID.

She said she packed it away, but can’t remember where, laughing in a way that suggested otherwise, prompting the school district to open an investigation. And Pitzen said that she hadn’t found it yet, and put her hand over her mouth to extinguish a chuckle.

And when a student asked her where the flag was, saying it was sort of weird that they stand and then say the Pledge of Allegiance to nothing, the teacher shrugged it off and told them that she was working on it.

Pitzen should have stayed in her lane as a teacher. Her mission was to develop skills such as Math and English because political and cultural views shouldn’t have been on her list.

This is just brainwashing, and it appears that children are being shoved through the system without basic writing and math skills, and teaching her views was certainly not part of the curriculum.

And children have no future when attention-seeking nincompoops like this woman are permitted to brainwash children’s thoughts. She was a teacher employed to teach, not bootleg her agenda.

Setting her own agenda in her own time was her right. However, it was improper for her to drag her students into towing to her own agenda in school time, and she had no right to force her comfort onto children – why bring children into this stupidity?

And where are they recruiting these teachers from? Perhaps it’s the majority of what these so-called higher institutions of education are churning out. Snowflakes with a sense of entitlement that it makes you want to barf, and it seems that each generation is getting worse.

CDC’s ‘Woke’ New Language Guide

A new guide on inclusive communication by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention to improve health equality has published a long list of words and phrases such as elderly, smokers and poor for less dehumanising language.

The guide includes a list of guiding principles and preferred terms to use rather than seemingly dehumanising ones such as poor and elderly to encourage a continuous shift toward non-stigmatising language.

The guide reads that long-standing systemic social health inequities have put some population groups at heightened risk of getting sick, having overall poor health, and having more serious outcomes when they do get ill and that we should avoid continuing these inequities in communication.

The guide asks health communicators and medical experts to examine how racism and other forms of prejudice unjustly disadvantage people and lead to social and health inequities.

The CDC website reads that language in communication products should reflect and speak to the needs of people in the audience of focus.

The guide gives a list of words in various categories to avoid using and recommends replacements to use instead.

Most of the recommendations are structured to read such as ‘a person with disabilities’ rather than describing someone as ‘disabled.’

In the disability category, the CDC also suggests avoiding the use of ‘differently abled’, ‘afflicted’ and ‘handicapped.’ And rather than calling someone ‘elderly’ or a ‘senior,’ the CDC recommends using the term ‘older adults’ or ‘elders.’

For drug and substance abuse terms, the CDC guide recommends avoiding the terms ‘drug users/addicts/drug abusers’ or ‘alcoholics/abusers.’

Instead, the CDC prefers that they be called terms such as ‘persons with substance use disorder’ or ‘persons with alcohol use disorder’, or even ‘persons in recovery from substance use/alcohol disorder.’

The CDC has even asked for ‘smokers’ to be referred to as ‘people who smoke.’

Meanwhile, poor people should be referred to as ‘people with lower incomes’ or ‘people experiencing poverty.’ And rather than ‘homeless people’ or ‘transient people,’ the CDC suggests referring to them as ‘people experiencing homelessness’ or ‘persons who are not securely housed.’

The CDC has recommended avoiding terms such as ‘mentally ill’ and ‘crazy’ and ‘insane’ while also avoiding using words such as ‘asylum’ in reference to mental hospitals and facilities.

The guide even includes a category for immigration, recommending that medical professionals avoid using such words as ‘illegals’, ‘illegal immigrants,’ and ‘illegal aliens.’

Instead, the CDC prefers dropping the word ‘illegal’ from the description or using words like ‘people with undocumented status’ or ‘foreign-born persons.’

When it comes to crime, the CDC recommends avoiding terms like ‘inmate’ and ‘prisoner’ and ‘criminal’. Instead, the agency prefers words like ‘people who are incarcerated’ or ‘people who were formerly incarcerated.’

The guide also has lengthy categories on topics such as how to refer to people who identify as LGBTQ or people of other races and ethnicities.

Perhaps then, rather than being called ‘woke’, those people should be referred to as ‘off their rocker’ or ‘people who have an absence of common sense.’

But of course, this is all a song and dance that will accomplish absolutely nothing, but undoubtedly these people are paid a small fortune for such rubbish.

Indeed, the solution is to substitute one word that has real meaning, with an entire sentence that has no meaning, and over time, the whole sentence will gain the same connotations as the single word, and then you wonder why no one takes the CDC seriously.

Boris Johnson Ignored Security Guidance

According to legal documents, Prime Minister Boris Johnson disregarded his own national security guidance over the use of a personal mobile phone.

In recent years, Boris Johnson is alleged to have texted both Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman and billionaire Sir James Dyson on his own mobile phone to discuss official business.

This is despite Boris Johnson and senior ministers being warned two years ago not to conduct government business on their personal devices or communication apps.

The revelation comes amid questions over minister’s extensive use of WhatsApp and other messaging apps when conducting government communications.

Ministers were issued with classified advice following the 2019 general election, warning them that both their personal mobile phones and email accounts were at risk of being hacked.

The document titled ‘The Security of Government Business’ was given to ministers after the Conservative Party’s election victory, and was marked ‘Official – Sensitive.’

A newspaper outlet reported that the document warned ministers that their personal IT wouldn’t be as reliable as that issued by government departments.

It also said they shouldn’t use personal devices, email and communication applications for government affairs at any clarification.

The advice issued to ministers was revealed as part of a legal case brought against the government by campaign group Foxglove and the non-profit organisation The Citizens, which were trying to stop ministers from making a major decision over apps like WhatsApp and Signal, where messages can be set to disappear.

Executive director of The Citizens Clara Maguire told a newspaper outlet that it was extraordinary that it had taken their legal action to uncover the fact that the government had a secret policy banning the use of WhatsApp messages and private emails for government affairs.

Cori Crider, Foxglove’s director, questioned whether Boris Johnson had ever bothered to read his own secret policy banning minister’s from using personal devices and applications.

Recent reports have unveiled the extent of minister’s reliance on their personal mobile phones, private email accounts and apps such as WhatsApp when conducting government business.

And it’s been reported that Boris Johnson and the Saudi prince texted about a possible Saudi backed takeover bid for Newcastle United football club.

Meanwhile, Mr Dyson is said to have messaged the Prime Minister to secure favourable tax arrangements for his staff coming to the United Kingdom to supply ventilators amid a shortage during the depths of the coronavirus pandemic.

Does Boris Johnson follow any of the rules? It appears not, and when are people going to accept that he doesn’t give a damn about the country or its people, and it seems that he doesn’t like to listen to anyone or anything – only his own voice!

Perhaps he was begging for some money because clearly, he can’t live on £150,000 but he expects the poor to live on shirt buttons, but yet the immigrants are given homes, health care and benefits amounting to far more than pensioners ever get – it’s no wonder they all want to come to the United Kingdom.

It’s time to get rid of scruffy bumbling Boris Johnson because he ignores what’s staring him in the face all the time and perhaps once people thought he was a smart man, an intelligent man with the veneer of a buffoon, but now people are realising that it was no veneer and the intelligence was abstract, and it’s no shock that gibbering Boris Johnson is cosying up to the moneyed.

New York Air Force Veteran And Her Young Daughter Are Living Out Of Her Car

A landlord in upstate New York has been forced to live out of her car after the tenants of her three properties refused to pay rent for almost a year, while she’s powerless to evict them due to the state and federal moratoriums.

Brandie LaCasse, who’s owed more than $23,000 in uncollected rent from her three properties, hasn’t received rental assistance funds from the government after at least one of her tenants were approved for rental help.

Brandie LaCasse, an Air Force veteran, has been left effectively homeless without the income to support herself and her daughter. The single mother and her daughter have been living out of her car or staying with friends.

She said that she’s cried many nights, thinking, where’s my money, and she added that she didn’t understand how they could give her private property to somebody to live for free, and that she’d purchased that property, and fixed it up with her own blood, sweat and tears.

She said that she invested in the properties, never believing she would never have a place to live and that she just wanted her house, that’s it.

Brandie LaCasse claimed she’d notified her tenants that they needed to move out that she could move in when they chose to quit paying her rent.

Her tenant Carla McArthur, who was approved for rental support, expressed her sympathies for the landlord’s position but told CBS News that she can’t pay rent because of the huge costs for childcare for her daughter and autistic son.

Carla McArthur said that she felt bad that she hadn’t been able to pay Brandie LaCasse, and but they’d gone from two incomes, that she had COVID 19 twice, and that all her children have had it once, and that her husband had it once, and that they’d all been hit by the virus.

Carla McArthur said she worries that Brandie LaCasse will kick her family to the curb when the moratorium has been lifted, leaving them homeless in the process.

Brandie LaCasse’s situation mirrors the current situation for numerous landlords across the country, as the US Treasury Department has noted that almost 90 per cent of rental assistance funds have not been distributed.

New York has only doled out about 8 per cent of the $2.6 billion federally designated for rental assistance to landlords.

The ultimate goal is collectivism, communalism, and the seizure of private property, and the reality is that its radical communism that enables oppression and creates poverty to the masses, and this is terrifying.

Imagine owning three properties and then being homeless because someone else fears they will end up homeless, also knowing that this woman also has a child.

Couldn’t they just come to some agreement whereby they all live in the house, that way nobody is homeless? Otherwise, this becomes evil because numerous families depend on rental revenue, and America’s founding forefathers must be spinning in their graves.

There are many landlords in America, but some renters don’t bother to pay their rent, but the landlord still has to pay all the expenses and can’t remove them.

There is government assistance for tenants to pay their rent but many don’t even bother applying because it’s simply too much trouble and not deserving of their time, since they’re living there rent-free anyhow, and it seems that America is all about compensating freeloaders and cheaters and punishing the hard-working.

Gladiator Star ‘Shadow’, 60, Is Imprisoned For More Than Six Years

A bodybuilder well-known for his starring performance in the 1990s television show Gladiator has been jailed for his part in a blackmail plot over a drugs debt.

Michael Jefferson King, known to millions as Shadow from the ITV game show, was one of four people who kept a man detained in a flat in Acton, west London, during a torturous attack lasting about eight hours.

Michael Jefferson King as a lieutenant to the plot, which ended in Aaron Ali being beaten and filmed for extremely distressing videos sent to his family to obtain payment of up to £1,000 to let him go.

At one stage, Michael Jefferson King was claimed to have ordered a co-defendant to get a hammer to break his legs after Aaron Ali tried to escape.

Michael Jefferson King, 60, a long time user of crack cocaine and heroin, was given a sentence of six years and three months after admitting two counts of blackmail at Isleworth Crown Court.

Three other defendants, so-called ringleader Simon Batson, Donna Harman, and Otis Noel, were also sentenced for their part in the plot.

The judge, Her Honour Judge Fiona Barrie, said that a conspiracy was planned by the four defendants to extract money from Mr Ali’s family and that he was subjected to a sustained and cruel attack over numerous hours, and from lunchtime until 9 pm he said he was tortured by the group.

She said that Mr Ali said he was treated as less than a human by people he knew, all for drugs and money.

King, who was born in London to Jamaican parents, moved to New York aged 14, where he entered the school American football team.

He later returned to England, where he met his wife and fathered two children before being selected as a Gladiator for the original 1992 series hosted by Ulrika Jonsson.

In 1995 King was caught snorting cocaine, then axed from the ITV show after testing positive for steroids.

He later turned to heroin and crack cocaine, lost his home and family and served a series of jail sentences.

In 2009 he went into rehab and stayed clean, revealing in 2011 that he’d beaten his habit and worked at a rehab clinic to help people suffering from drug problems, but last year he was arrested for heroin possession.

The shadow of his former self displayed no emotion as the sentence was announced.

And how life can go so terribly wrong, but at the end of the day, it’s all about making choices, and all for one thousand pounds, and a six-year jail sentence, but sadly this man is a drug addict and they get so blurred that all they can think about is their next fix.

What King did was appalling and clearly, he deserves to be jailed, but it’s also quite sad to see him end up like this, and if there’s a lesson to learn it’s that life is corrupted by drug use, and can only lead to a spiralling problem and loss.

Drugs affect countless people in many ways and this is a sad and melancholy story for a man that many kids wanted to aspire to, but there’s no aspiring to this man!

And what a wasted life – it’s all over for him now, just an old man washed up ex celebrity, and how the mighty has fallen.

It’s just a pity that this man can’t shake his demons. Addiction begins with the hope that something out there can instantly fill up the void inside, but in fact, it kills whatever is left.

Sirhan Sirhan – Who Assassinated Robert F Kennedy

The man who killed Senator Robert F Kennedy in 1968 could be freed on parole after prosecutors said they won’t oppose his parole request.

Sirhan B Sirhan, now 77, has spent the last 53 years in a San Diego prison and is scheduled to stand in front of a California parole board for the 16th time on Friday.

His last parole hearing was in February 2016.

He was originally condemned to death, but California temporarily banned capital punishment and his sentence was reduced to life in prison, with that loophole also giving him the chance to seek freedom.

Robert Kennedy Jr is supporting Sirhan’s bid for freedom because he doesn’t think he’s the man who killed his father, and in 2018, he visited Sirhan in jail and told him he didn’t believe he was responsible for the shooting.

Sirhan admitted to the killing shortly after it occurred in Los Angeles in 1968 but has maintained for years that he has no recollection of it.

Robert Kennedy Jr said in 2018 that he believed someone else shot his father, and that Sirhan was set up to take the blame for it, and that he wanted the case to be reopened.

LA County District Attorney George Gascon hasn’t indicated whether or not he will reopen the case and it’s unclear if Sirhan intends to file an appeal.

Prosecutors have opposed his parole efforts 15 times and LA County’s new District Attorney, George Gascon, is choosing to remain unbiased this time.

Gascon’s office will not attend Sirhan’s parole hearing, nor do they intend to send a letter in support of him, and Alex Bastian, special adviser to Gascon told a newspaper outlet that the position of a prosecutor and their access to information ends at sentencing and that the parole board’s sole goal was to impartially decide whether someone was suitable for release and that if someone is the same person that perpetrated an appalling crime, that person would not correctly be found suitable for release.

However, if someone is no longer a menace to public safety after having completed more than 50 years in jail, then the parole board may support discharge based on an unbiased decision.

Former Maryland lieutenant governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend said in 2018 that she supported her brother’s calls for a new investigation into their father’s killing.

Sirhan was arrested on June 5, 1968, at the scene of Kennedy’s Los Angeles shooting and sentenced to first-degree murder after he confessed, but has maintained over the years that he has no memory of the day of the confession.

Perhaps this man is innocent, but who knows when so much truth has been buried, and if Robert F Kennedy Jr and Kathleen Kennedy Townsend aren’t convinced that Sirhan B Sirhan killed their father, then who do they think did it, or has that been buried as well? And nobody’s going to let the cat out of the bag, too much has been seen already.

However, it’s all pretty ominous, and there was a lot of evidence – gun in his hand, gunpowder traces on his hand, fingertips and the gun et cetera, unless the argument is that he was brainwashed by someone else to do it.

Hundreds Of New Yorkers Descend On Manhattan

Hundreds of New Yorkers assembled outside City Hall in Manhattan on Wednesday to oppose COVID 19 vaccine mandates.

Demonstrators claimed that they should have the right to be routinely tested for the virus instead of being made to get vaccinated or otherwise lose their jobs.

In light of the extremely contagious Delta variant, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio stated earlier this week that businesses have a grace period until September 13 to begin implementing vaccine checkpoints before facing $1,000 penalties, but numerous bars and restaurants are already demanding evidence of vaccination to enter.

He said there won’t be an option of a weekly test in place of a vaccine.

Demonstration organiser Michael Kane told Pix 11 the rally was about choice, but he wouldn’t tell the local news station if he was vaccinated but called the recently imposed mandates authoritarianism.

In his announcement, de Blasio also said that every staff member at an NYC public school must get at least one shot of the vaccine by September 27, and he said that he thought that a vaccine mandate for all adults that work with children was the right thing for the city.

The mayor’s announcement came just 24 hours after de Blasio broke from Governor Andrew Cuomo and said he wouldn’t bring back an indoor mask mandate in the city.

De Blasio said last week that if people want to participate in society fully, they’ve got to get vaccinated, but businesses, unions and critics of the mandates were quickly angered, citing personal freedom arguments.

In parts of the city where the majority of people were resisting the vaccine, business owners were worried the mandates would be a fatal setback after the virus stopped them from working at full capacity for months last year.

It will fall largely on businesses to implement the policy and de Blasio maintained it wouldn’t be too different from a host escorting someone to a table or a box office assistant selling a ticket.

The Big Apple now requires documentation of vaccination for people attending indoor venues such as restaurants, gyms and shows, as the city attempts to get back on its feet. However, the vaccine mandates are laden with complications as restaurants servers, bartenders and ticket brokers at already understaffed businesses now must implement the vaccination rules.

But mindful that another economic shutdown could be unfavourable, some restaurants and bar owners are embracing the mandates as a way to manage the virus and are keeping their doors open, and there’s something chilling when a government attempts to force its people to take a vaccine – next, they’ll be putting people into quarantine camps.

And if they can force a vaccine, then they can force anything.

If the vaccines work like they say that they do, then why would vaccinated people fear those that haven’t been vaccinated – it either works or it doesn’t!

The problem is people have no idea what goes into these vaccines, the side effects, injuries or deaths that will come from them, not in the long run anyway. Everything appears to be hidden from the public, and there’s no informed consent either, you either get the jab or lose your job.

So, what comes after the vaccine mandate – chips to control people, or are they already doing that?

And the thing is you can’t sue if the vaccine makes you sick or worse, and there’s zero accountability by the vaccine dealers and pushers, which is basically what they are.

Britain Is Set To End Unnecessary Web Cookie Requests

The Culture Secretary will announce proposals to sweep away swathes of the EU’s flagship data laws which could spell the end of pointless web cookie warnings and red tape.

In what is the first post Brexit shake-up of the UK’s digital economy, Oliver Dowden is set to outline how Briton’s data can be used more flexibly.

Speaking to a newspaper outlet, Oliver Dowden said the Government plans to peel away from key parts of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, which came into force in 2018.

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which dictates how people’s personal information is collected, has been criticised for being too bureaucratic and overly rigid.

Oliver Dowden suggested the new reforms would also cut down on cookie banners, which are used by websites to secure users permission for collecting their data.

At present under the GDPR rules, sites have to give users a genuine choice over whether to say yes or no to cookies that process and share their data.

Ministers are also said to be preparing to shake up Britain’s data watchdog.

The Government is set to select John Edwards, who’s currently New Zealand’s privacy commissioner, to head up the regulator.

Oliver Dowden described the reforms as a data dividend of Brexit and said the new British framework would be more proportionate, and he added that it would help to cut the costs for businesses and facilitate great innovation which would also encourage growth, opportunities and jobs.

However, the EU continues to trumpet GDPR as having improved data privacy measures across the world, meaning the United Kingdom could trigger fresh tensions with the bloc by deviating from the rules.

The policies will also likely be scrutinised by privacy campaigners who fear further online profiling of individuals and greater massing of personal data by large companies.

Oliver Dowden said the reforms would bring an end to unnecessary bureaucracy and box-ticking but would still protect people’s privacy.

What’s irritating is that some sites make it virtually impossible to decline cookies, while other sites give simple options – accept, chose or decline all.

Most sites use cookies, but it’s not about that, it’s what the cookies are being used for, like the information that they collect about you, and the profile that you build up – a digital footprint of your life.

And of course, with that digital footprint, they have the ability to track you, your data farmed out and sold. So, what that implies is that all this data that your cookies are gathering are collecting all of your data, and ultimately it will be without your say so.

Eventually, they will eliminate all barriers, it will be a total take over by the oppressive elite, who couldn’t care less about you, and I bet Governments have much more in store for us, and it seems that we have no privacy online, whatever box we tick.

The problem is the law doesn’t go far enough. The law should be that there should be no cookies unless a person explicitly gives consent, and the default should be a ‘no’ button.

And if the information is to be used, that data should stay where it’s put and used for the purpose that person provides it for.

Welcome to the 21st century where our privacy rights have also been eroded.

These cookies track your digital behaviour (digital footprint) and numerous companies use them for many reasons because the cookies build a profile of the user and this information is sold on or used for other reasons, but it’s making a mockery of your rights.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started