‘Keir Starmer Does Not Give A S*** About Us’

The bereaved family of a woman who was killed randomly by a Channel boat migrant have turned their anger on Keir Starmer for failing to act on illegal migration.

Mother-of-one Rhiannon Whyte, 27, was stabbed 23 times with a screwdriver by ‘evil’ Deng Chol Majek, who ambushed her after her shift at the asylum hotel where he had been living.

The ‘demonic and inhuman’ Sudanese national had arrived in the UK just three months earlier and lied about everything from his age – falsely declaring he was 18 – to his responsibility for the October 2024 killing.

Once back at the Park Inn Hotel in Walsall, he was even captured on camera dancing and drinking with other migrants, clearly thrilled with his horrific act of violence.

As he was jailed for at least 29 years at Coventry Crown Court, Ms Whyte’s sister, Emma, accused the Prime Minister of failing to take women’s safety seriously and called for migrant hotels to be ‘shut down’.

Speaking to the Daily Mail, she delivered a stark statement to Sir Keir: ‘Let’s hope it never happens to you.’

She continued: ‘Keir Starmer would not listen, he does not give a s*** about us.

‘He’s the worst thing that ever happened to us.’

Standing alongside Ms Whyte’s mother, Donna, she suggested Sir Keir was ignoring concerns about the dangers posed by migrant hotels because they were mainly being raised by women.

‘Nobody wants to listen to women,’ she said.

The family is now advocating for more stringent measures against unauthorised immigrants, such as Majek, who are housed at government expense even if authorities are unaware of their past.

Ms Whyte’s mother said, ‘We don’t know what the hell they’re doing. Why are we allowing this to continuously happen?’

By forcing Ms Whyte’s family to endure a trial while putting up a tenuous defence against the overwhelming evidence against him, Majek had made a mockery of the legal system in the United Kingdom.

He accused a forensic expert of lying about finding Ms Whyte’s blood all over his clothes and insisted it was a man dressed in identical clothing – not him – caught on CCTV stalking Ms Whyte to Bescot station, where she was attacked.

Three days after a train driver discovered Ms Whyte gravely injured in the platform shelter, she passed away in the hospital.

In a final affront to the family, Gurdeep Garcha KC, representing Majek, announced at the sentencing hearing that he was continuing to maintain his innocence.

Majek had no documentation upon arrival in the UK and claimed to be aged 18, despite previously telling German authorities he was actually eight years older.

Keir Starmer and his cabinet have blood on their hands, and this needs to stop now!

Why does Keir Starmer continue to let migrants into the UK? He gives them every incentive to come here – free accommodation, free food, extremely generous pocket money, free healthcare and the list goes on and on and on. These migrants should be grateful, but instead they go around killing people, and think that it’s all extremely amusing as well. They are accountable for so many crimes, and the people that they have killed would still be here today if they were not allowed into the UK, but Keir Starmer is allowing it!

Meanwhile, our Labour government is deceiving us about important matters, such as migration. They are the most despicable and deceitful government in history.

Almost every day, I read about rape, violent sexual assault, and this time murder.

Our women and children are not collateral damage, and because of this, it is wilful neglect by our government. The first role of any government is to protect its people – we never asked for this!

Polar Bears Are Getting FATTER

Their icy hunting grounds is rapidly shrinking, but polar bears in Norway’s remote Svalbard archipelago have defied the odds by bulking up instead of wasting away, a study has found.

The Barents Sea has lost its ice at a faster rate than other areas populated by polar bears, as temperatures have risen there more rapidly than in other Arctic regions, according to research published in the journal Scientific Reports.

However, polar bears in Svalbard have acquired body fat rather than becoming slimmer, unlike those in other Arctic regions, because the sea ice where they hunt is receding.

‘The increase in body condition during a period of significant loss of sea ice was a surprise,’ said Jon Aars, the study’s lead author and a scientist at the Norwegian Polar Institute (NPI).

Polar bears in Svalbard have become plumper by feasting on land-based prey such as reindeer and walruses – species that have recovered after being over-exploited by humans, the study said.

Warmer temperatures have also made it easier for them to hunt ringed seals that now crowd in smaller sea ice areas.

The scientists analysed the body condition index (BCI) of 770 adult bears between 1995 and 2019 to determine how much – or how little – fat they bear – pardon the pun!

They discovered that their BCI fell until 2000 but increased in subsequent years despite a period of rapid loss of sea ice.

The total polar bear population of the Barents Sea was estimated at between 1,900 and 3,600 in 2004 and may have increased since then, the study said.

The increase in air temperature has been two to four times higher in the Arctic than the global average over recent decades.

The Barents Sea has experienced even more significant increases in temperature than other areas in the Arctic over the past four decades, increasing by up to 2 °C per decade in some places.

The area has also lost sea ice habitat at a rate of four days per year between 1979 and 2014, more than twice as fast as other regions hosting polar bears, it said.

The Svalbard findings may seem surprising because they contradict the results of studies conducted in other polar bear populations’, said Sarah Cubaynes, a researcher at French environmental research centre CEFE who was not involved in the study.

The physical condition of polar bears in Hudson Bay, for example, ‘has greatly declined due to warming’, Cubaynes told AFP.

Now you can call me a conspiracy theorist, but I do not believe in climate change as such.

Because of the variations in water density, melting sea ice has a small impact but does not considerably raise sea levels.

Sea Ice: This is ice that forms from seawater and floats on the ocean’s surface. When sea ice liquefies, it doesn’t contribute greatly to the sea level rise because it’s already displacing its own weight in the water.

The melting of sea ice results in fresh water that is less dense than the surrounding salty ocean water, which can lead to a slight increase in volume, but this effect is minimal.

Land Ice: This includes glaciers and ice sheets that are found on land. 

When land ice melts, it adds more water to the ocean, directly contributing to sea level rise. This is an important factor in global sea levelshifts.

The Impact of Melting Sea Ice

While melting sea ice doesn’t cause a substantial elevation in sea levels, it can still have minor effects. For example, the fresh water from melting sea ice is less dense than the salty ocean water, which can slightly raise the overall volume of water in the ocean. However, this contribution is much smaller compared to the effects of melting land ice.

Studies reveal that the melting of sea ice has contributed about 0.04 inches (1.1 millimetres) to sea level elevation between 1994 and 2017, which is somewhat insignificant compared to the contributions from land ice melt.

Conclusion

In summary, while melting sea ice does have a small impact on sea level elevation due to its lower density compared to saltwater, the overall impact is minimal. The primary concern for rising sea levels comes from the melting of land ice, which adds considerable quantities of water to the oceans. Understanding these dynamics is essential for accurately assessing the impacts of climate change on sea levels.

Yes, of course, over centuries of pollution from large industrial metropolises and coal mining towns, so there was going to be some form of global warming, but it’s not all down to pollution. Volcanic eruptions can discharge considerable quantities of CO2 and ash into the air, and as the sun changes, energy output can affect the Earth’s climate, but these variations happen over long timescales and are not responsible for the rapid warming observed in recent decades.

Natural Climate Cycles, which the Earth has experienced with its natural cycles of warming and cooling due to factors like shifts in its orbit and axial tilt. However, the current rate of warming is unusual and cannot be explained by the natural processes alone.

The overwhelming scientific consensus is that human activities are the primary driver of the recent changes in climate, particularly since the 

Industrial Revolution. While natural processes do contribute to climate variability, they cannot account for the rapid transformations we are witnessing today.

So, by all means, think green, that’s awesome, but we destroyed this wonderful planet of ours an extremely long time ago.

We are told to think green, live green for our environment. Electric vehicles are now the thing that are powered by lithium batteries, and what does that do to our environment?

Lithium batteries involve several stages, each with its own environmental impact.

The process starts with the extraction of lithium, cobalt, and other minerals, which can lead to significant environmental degradation, including habitat destruction and pollution.  

The manufacturing method is also energy-intensive, contributing to carbon emissions unless renewable energy sources are utilised.

At the end of their life, if not properly recycled, these batteries contribute to electronic waste, a growing environmental concern. Recycling lithium-ion batteries can mitigate these effects by recovering valuable materials and reducing the demand for virgin resources.

Then of course, there is the matter of plastic, paper and cotton tote bags, which all have sustainability issues.

Aldi, Asda and Sainsbury’s have increased their plastic bag charges by up to 50 per cent in the past two years. Now you’ll pay anything from 10p to 60p for a reusable plastic bag at major supermarkets, with stores expected to donate the proceeds to good causes.

Supermarkets supplied 133 million single-use plastic bags in the 2022-23 financial year – a huge 99 per cent reduction on the 1.33 billion they supplied just after the charge was introduced in 2016-17.

On the face of it, this is good news. You’re definitely less likely to see carrier bags littering the road or caught in tree branches these days – but behind the scenes, is enough being done to recycle the plastic bags that are still used? And what is the most sustainable way to carry home your shopping?

Single-use plastic bags are a nightmare for the environment, taking decades to decay in landfill. 

Most supermarkets have replaced their old thin bags with thicker versions, usually dubbed ‘bags for life’. These bags are stronger, so you can reuse them on numerous shopping trips.

When your bag for life breaks, shops return the damaged bag for recycling, and you may often exchange it for a new one for free.

But this is where things get tricky. Most supermarkets accept all manner of soft plastics for recycling – not just shopping bags – so it’s difficult to measure the amount of plastic bags that do get recycled.

If customers are choosing to recycle or reuse bags at home for other purposes – for instance, using them as bin liners for general waste – the bags could still end up in landfill.

Since recycling soft plastics and film can be tricky, especially if they’re contaminated with food waste, it’s possible that some won’t end up being recycled at all. An investigation by Bloomberg that put trackers into plastic bags discovered that some soft plastic was being dumped at an industrial estate in Turkey.

When the carrier bag charge was introduced in 2015, the intention was for supermarkets to spend the proceeds on projects that helped the environment.

The government’s plastic bag guide for businesses presently says: ‘Once you’ve deducted reasonable costs, it’s expected that you’ll donate the proceeds to good causes, particularly environmental causes.’ 

However, this doesn’t seem to be happening at every major supermarket.

Although Tesco claims to spend more on its community initiatives than it does on plastic bag sales, the company treats plastic bag revenue as general revenue.

Asda said that it treats funds generated by plastic bag sales the same as sales of any other item it sells. Like all supermarkets, though, it does donate money to community projects.

Other supermarkets said plastic bag sales fund charitable projects, though these aren’t always related to sustainability.

When choosing a bag, the key thing to consider is how often you’ll reuse it. The more you reuse it, the more sustainable it is as an option.

A 2020 report from the Life Cycle Initiative (LCI), which looked at the impact of several types of plastic bags over 10 years, said: ‘The number of times a bag is used directly influences its environmental impacts.

‘For instance, if a bag is used for shopping twice instead of once, it has only half the environmental impact per shopping round.’

M&S may have started offering reusable paper bags in its stores since paper is thought to be more recyclable than plastic.

Paper shopping bags tend to be less durable than the plastic alternative, however. And according to the LCI report, a paper bag’s climate impact can vary greatly, depending on factors like the fuel used in production.

Waste charity Wrap says you can reuse plastic bags ‘well over 50 times’ depending on what they’re made from.

When plastic bags are incinerated, the CO2 they release is harmful to the planet, whereas the CO2 emissions from incinerating paper bags are part of the natural carbon cycle, according to the LCI report.

However, the methane emissions from paper bags will be more detrimental if both plastic and paper bags wind up in a landfill.

On the surface, compostable and biodegradable bags appear to be a good choice, but you are less likely to reuse biodegradable bags since they are weaker and thinner.

Although cotton tote bags are often the most durable shopping bags, they are only environmentally friendly if they are used repeatedly.

According to the LCI study, you need to use a tote bag 50 to 150 times for it to have the same environmental impact as one single-use plastic bag. In short, if you already own a tote bag, don’t buy another – just reuse that one again and again. 

Indeed, the question of which bags are most sustainable is extremely complex. The only impact-free way of getting your shopping home would be to carry it without using any bags. But assuming you’re buying too much for that to be possible, try to reuse any bags you already have – and always recycle them once they’ve become unusable.

Some people use plastic boxes or cardboard boxes. My father used to do this. He would go into the store, buy his shopping, and at the checkout would put it back into the trolley as it was being scanned through and then take the trolley out to his car and put the shopping into the boxes, but of course, not everyone owns a car, but for those that do, this is a great idea, and no plastic bags have to be used. I myself use a shopping trolley to bring my food back home because I don’t drive.

At the end of the day, I loathe the term ‘sustainable’ or ‘sustainable development’ because I believe it’s an oxymoron, as development is inherently unsustainable.

‘Homeless’ Sarah Ferguson Has ‘Nowhere To Live’

Sarah Ferguson is yet to find a new permanent property because she won’t move in with her ex-husband, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, and their children can’t offer her a home, it was claimed.

The former Duchess of York is in the midst of a ‘housing crisis’ and is clinging on to the hope of finding a new home in Windsor, a source close to her has said.

But the 66-year-old will have to ‘lower her expectations’ about the standard of her next home after decades in the 30-room Royal Lodge.

Fergie is said to be in a ‘fragile’ state over her fall from grace, telling friends her recent travails were ‘not good for my mental health’.

Andrew and Fergie lost their titles and their Windsor mansion, once home to the Queen Mother, over their long friendship with billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

But while Andrew is begrudgingly off to Sandringham, Ms Ferguson ‘will not be moving in’ because she ‘would prefer to stay in the Windsor area’, a friend has said.

‘Relations are warmer between Ferguson and the couple’s daughters, but no offer of permanent accommodation has been extended to their mother’, according to The Times.

‘For now, Andrew and Sarah have a housing crisis. It may mean that they have to lower their expectations about the sort of lifestyle they wish to lead.’

Beatrice lives in the Cotswolds, while Eugenie splits her time between Kensington Palace and a Portuguese villa, so neither can give their mother a roof over her head.

The sisters are said to have offered their mother a place to stay when she needs it – but not permanently.

Andrew’s move to Marsh Farm in Norfolk could even be ‘in doubt’ because he is ‘unhappy’ with the security there, according to the new report.

In a piece on what life will be like for Andrew when he turns 66 next month, The Times’ senior royal writer Kate Mansey says there is still a row raging over Marsh Farm.

Although the King is spending a lot of money renovating the property and its grounds, it is reported that his younger brother is delaying moving in.

Ms Mansey also claims that Andrew’s siblings, Princess Anne and Prince Edward, remain in touch with Andrew and are worried about him.

‘He has a few loyal friends and some sources close to the royal family suspect that Charles’s steely approach may have been too tough’, she writes.

‘Despite extensive work beginning on Marsh Farm, however, it is understood that even this is now in doubt.

‘A huge security overhaul is required to make it safe for Andrew. Builders have been working to install secure gates and alarm systems, but the former duke is understood to be unhappy with the arrangement, and others have questioned how appropriate the accommodation is for such a high-profile figure.’

I hate to break the news to Fergie, but welcome to the real world, and I don’t believe for one moment that this woman won’t be offered a nice little cushy home.

I’m sure she could afford to buy a one-bedroom flat somewhere, but of course, that wouldn’t come with an entourage of servants, security and cooks.

Homeless, my foot, and it’s such an insulting remark to make to people who actually are homeless. She should try sleeping in a doorway, as our veterans do, but poor Fergie, she only knows a sponger’s life – what is she supposed to do?

People like Fergie and Andrew seem to believe that they need looking after. Poppycock – surely they know how to make a bed and boil an egg, and if not, learn, it’s not hard, nor will the egg be if Andrew attempts this simple feat.

A Lottery Winner Turned Into A Drug Kingpin By Setting Up A £288 Million Pill Factory At Home

An elderly National Lottery winner set up a drugs lab at his rural cottage, producing fake prescription drugs worth as much as £288 million. 

John Eric Spiby – who had a ‘significant’ criminal history – won a £2.4 million jackpot in 2010 when he was 65.

But the millionaire pensioner went on to build a ‘sophisticated’ lab to produce counterfeit medication in ‘stables’ opposite his cottage near Wigan, Greater Manchester, a court heard.

Discussing the illegal business, he bragged, ‘Elon and Jeff best watch their backs’ – an apparent reference to US tech billionaires Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos.

Along with his son and two associates, Spiby set up a second drug factory in Salford to flood the streets with ‘unregulated, unlicensed and unchecked’ drugs.

Desperate users who bought the pills were playing ‘Russian roulette’ with their lives, prosecutors said, with an increase in drug-related deaths in the area.

However, the group were under police surveillance, and when officers finally pounced on a hired van, it was found to have 2.6 million counterfeit Diazepam tablets with a street value of up to £5.2 million.

Police raided a string of properties and found three firearms plus ammunition, as well as cash and industrial tablet manufacturing machinery.

Detectives estimate that the potential street value of the drugs produced by Spiby and his gang ranged from £57.6 million to £288 million.

Now 80, Spiby Sr denied any knowledge of the conspiracy, but was convicted of drug crimes.

Jailing him for 16-and-a-half years on Tuesday, a judge told him he had been ‘senior both in name and role’. 

‘Despite your lottery win, you continued to live your life of crime beyond what would be a normal retirement age,’ the Recorder of Bolton, Judge Nicholas Clarke KC, said.

His son, John Colin Spiby, and associate Lee Drury were imprisoned for more than 18 years.

Another gang member, Callum Dorrian, 35, was given 12 years at a prior hearing.

Spiby Snr’s lab opposite his cottage had frosted windows to ‘hide’ what was being done inside.

‘Industrial-scale’ equipment was capable of producing tens of thousands of tablets per hour.

Drury used his company, Nutra Inc, as a ‘front’ to cover up the illicit business, Bolton Crown Court heard.

Between June 2020 and May 2022, £200,000 worth of machinery and ingredients were purchased, with pills marketed for 65p each.

But the plot was thwarted after incriminating messages on encrypted EncroChat exchanges – dubbed WhatsApp for criminals – were cracked by French law enforcement.

The man won millions on the lottery, so why did he need more millions? Now he will likely die in prison instead of enjoying the money he had – obviously, he was a silly, greedy man – he had all that money. Still, he wanted to be a criminal, and any remaining assets should be confiscated as proceeds of crime.

This man obviously knew nothing but crime, and when he won the lottery, it just got worse. I mean, how foolish does one have to be? You would think that at his time of life, the only thing on his mind would be sitting on a beach somewhere with loads of women, sipping at a Margarita. Instead, he was boxing up drugs with his son, thinking he was El Chappo.

It seems that good people don’t win, and rotten people who do win become more rotten.

John D Rockefeller, at one point, was asked how much money is enough, and he replied, ‘Just one dollar more, and ask me again.’

This quote reflects his view that there is no end to the pursuit of wealth, as he humorously suggested that asking for just one more dollar would 
lead to an ongoing cycle of wanting more. This sentiment is reflected in 
various discussions about the greedy nature of the pursuit of money, 
indicating that the hunger for more can never really be satisfied.

However, so many lottery winners fritter away their fortune – at least this one had an entrepreneurial spirit.

Trump Killers Recruited By TikTok Librarian

A West Virginia librarian was arrested after she allegedly posted videos online rallying people to assassinate President Trump.

Morgan Morrow, 39, is accused of making terroristic threats after she used ‘social media recruitment to pursue and assassinate Trump,’ per the Jackson County Sheriff’s Department.

‘When you saddle up on the horse of stupidity, you have to be prepared for the ride that follows,’ Sheriff Ross Mellinger told 13 News.

Police discovered the chilling threat on Sunday and traced it to Morrow, a Jackson County Public Library worker, who allegedly posted on TikTok calling for the president’s assassination, according to the criminal complaint.

Morrow’s TikTok post was labelled, ‘Surely a (sniper) with a terminal illness can’t be a big ask out of 343 million,’ per the complaint.

After checking her content and the surrounding context, police concluded the statement prompted a vile call for the president’s assassination. 

Investigators subsequently confronted the librarian at her residence in Ripley, where she was arrested and taken into custody. 

In an interview with police, Morrow allegedly admitted that she wrote and posted the statement on TikTok, claiming it was ‘intended as a threat directed toward President Trump,’ the outlet reported.

She allegedly revealed her ‘personal reasons for wishing harm upon the President’ to police, though the complaint did not provide further particulars. 

While the librarian allegedly confessed to making the social media post, she claimed she had no intention of actually carrying out the threat.

Police, however, said her statements could ‘encourage, inspire, or entice others to carry out the threatened act, regardless of whether the speaker publicly intends to personally do so,’ per the complaint.

‘We’re just trying to do our part in making sure that it’s not acted upon, and there’s no one that’s following her footsteps to try to carry out the plan,’ Mellinger told the outlet.

Emphasising that the arrest was not a political statement but an ‘active, troubling criminal investigation’, the sheriff reiterated that social media threats or posts of this nature will not be tolerated.

‘It’s okay to be critical of the government. It’s okay to be critical of things you don’t agree with.

‘But when you start promoting the violence, and you’re promoting a plan to carry out the violence and recruiting other people to carry out the plan for you, that’s clearly crossing the line,’ the sheriff told the outlet.

The Jackson County Public Library released a social media statement about Morrow’s arrest, saying her comments do not reflect their ‘values.’ 

Now that Morrow has been incarcerated, she can become the prison librarian.

Donald Trump is not to my liking, but neither was Joe Biden or Obama, but I wouldn’t want them dead – I wouldn’t want any human being dead, but evidently, this woman has swallowed a lot of aggression.

Of course, we all have our beliefs, but sadly, freedom of speech comes with the consequences of our words. Can you imagine if everyone were arrested for every ill thought?

The First Amendment of the US Constitution states that ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the process; or the right of the people to peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances.’ However, the authors of the US Constitution had no feasible way to allot for or even imagine the invention of the public internet and the people who would be on it.

She wasn’t saying that she was going to hire a hit man or anything like that; she was just having her say, but because it was on TikTok and other people visit the site, it doesn’t mean that somebody wouldn’t have gone on there and thought that it was a jolly good idea, because people are like sheep and they all follow, it only takes one person to carry the deed out. However, her post should have been taken down by TikTok immediately.

Rise Of The Ram Raiders

A crime Britain believed it had conquered decades ago has returned in a frightening new guise – with overwhelmed police forces struggling to keep pace.

Organised gangs are using stolen vans, 4x4s, motorbikes and even heavy construction machinery to smash into shops, supermarkets, banks and jewellers across the UK in brute force ram-raids.

Once dismissed as a crude smash-and-grab crime of the 1980s, ram-raiding has developed into a smooth, high-impact tactic favoured by gangs who are usually long gone before officers arrive.

Police forces nationwide are now battling what insiders describe as a ‘relentless’ wave of attacks – not restricted to inner cities but rural villages too.

Experts warn ram-raiding has become one of the most efficient – and most difficult to stop – crimes in Britain.

Kevin Moore, former head of CID at Sussex Police, said the reasons behind the surge were stark.

He said: ‘There is an obvious reason for this escalation in so-called ram raid offences.

‘The rewards are high, and the risks of being caught are low.

‘The ability of the police to respond quickly, even to emergency calls, has decreased in recent years, due solely to the fact that front-line policing has been decimated due to a shortage of numbers.

‘Additionally, because such offences do not involve violence against the person, they tend to attract less severe prison sentences.’

There are no official national figures – but a glance at police appeals and local newspaper reports paints a gloomy picture, backed up by CCTV footage showing brazen raids unfolding in seconds.

In one incredible incident last October, residents in Milton Keynes filmed a telehandler being used to pull an ATM clean out of a supermarket wall.

The weighty machinery smashed through the shop front, dragged the cash machine into the street, hoisted it into the air and dropped it into the rear of a waiting pick-up truck.

Masked thieves then fled, leaving the telehandler and dumping rubble scattered across the road.

Karolina Oswiecimska, who filmed the ram raid, said: ‘My daughter heard cars and after a minute, she heard something like a chainsaw.

‘When she looked, they were already ripping out the ATM.

‘She called me, and I started recording. My partner called the police.

‘Everything was going so fast. They were there maybe for five to seven minutes.’

In nearby Towcester, raiders this month repeated a similar feat – stealing a telehandler before driving it to a nearby Nationwide branch.

Once there, they used the stolen construction vehicle to rip a cash machine from the wall, destroying the branch’s facade.

Northamptonshire Police said the gang then lowered the ATM into a blue Mercedes Vito van, which had a hole cut into the roof specifically to accommodate the machine, before fleeing the scene.

Meanwhile, in Retford, Notts, CCTV footage caught the moment a stolen digger was used in a botched ram raid on a Spar convenience store.

The offenders, John Charles and Reuben Reynolds, smashed through the shop’s front wall in the early hours of March 14 2023, activating alarms and leaving bricks and rubble strewn across the pavement.

Both men were incarcerated for four years, as of August 2024.

Jewellery stores have also been targeted with increasing boldness by ram raiders.

Alarming footage from a historic shopping arcade in Bognor Regis shows a stolen Range Rover sneaking into position before its driver revs sharply, yanking the steel security grille clean off a jeweller’s shop.

The force was so violent that it smashed the windows of a neighbouring business.

Within moments, robbers were inside, smashing display cabinets and grabbing £40,000 of gold, silver and luxury watches in a slick raid lasting scarcely four minutes.

No arrests have yet been made following the November heist.

In another case, phone footage this month captured a motorbike-mounted gang descending on a Rolex boutique in affluent Knightsbridge in West London.

Armed with crowbars, they threatened staff, scooped up high-value watches and fled in under three minutes.

Images show smashed glass cabinets and one motorbike evidently dumped inside the Bucherer Rolex Boutique at One Hyde Park.

Daylight attacks are also becoming increasingly common.

In March 2024, ram raiders smashed into a post office in east London and stole a cash machine – before struggling to load it into the boot of their getaway car.

In the video, three hooded guys are seen hauling the ATM off the Harold Hill shopfront using a rope that is tied to a vehicle, ripping a portion of the building with it.

They then try to open the machine with an angle grinder before struggling to pack it into the back of a getaway car and fleeing the scene.

The scourge is not limited to cities, but towns and villages, where the local ATM is often a crucial lifeline.

In Olney, Buckinghamshire, thieves used machinery to smash into a Nationwide branch for the second time.

The heavy vehicle was driven straight into the building in October, targeting the area where the ATM was installed and leaving the listed building’s facade torn wide open.

In July 2018, the front of the former Barclays in the market town was nearly destroyed when a JCB digger was driven through the front, and thieves made off with a cash machine.

In Hoyland, near Rotherham, ram-raiders struck this month for the second time – snatching cigarettes and leaving a huge bill for damage.

Criminals used two cars to smash their way through shutters on the front of the Cloughfields Convenience store to grab cigarettes worth an estimated £3,000 to £4,000.

Shopkeeper Asim Sehzad told how he was left facing a £20,000 repair bill.

In Kidsgrove, Staffs, a JCB was used to smash into a Co-op store – destroying posts used to discourage ram-raiders.

Co-ops in Billingham, Lincs; Newent, Glos, and Chandler’s Ford, Hants have also been targeted in recent weeks.

Meanwhile, in Wittering, Cambs, an excavator was used to plough into the community shop, pulling out the ATM.

Even the smallest communities are not being spared.

In Cheddar, Somerset – a village better known for tourism than violent crime – masked gangs last year targeted three shops in four different attacks.

Shop owner Elaine Moodie was left devastated after up to £20,000 worth of Jellycat toys were robbed in minutes from her The Gorge Bear Company store.

CCTV shows thieves ramming the door of the property with a vehicle before stuffing a heap of the fluffy toys into a bag before fleeing.

Ms Moodie said: We’ve worked so hard to build the business up to this level, and to have someone come in and do that to us is just heart-wrenching.

‘We have no idea (where they’ve come from), we don’t think that they’re local, but we do think they did their homework before the thefts.

‘You don’t expect it in a beautiful place like Cheddar.’

In Addingham, West Yorkshire, two women secretly filmed a telehandler smashing through the wall of a village Co-op just before 2 am last February.

Their whispered commentary, as the gang struggled to make their getaway with the heavy machine, revealed their disbelief at the destruction.

One gasped: ‘Oh my God, they are bringing half the building down.’

Two suspects were subsequently arrested by West Yorkshire Police.

While the spate of ram-raids continues to shock communities across Britain, police insist that some of those responsible are being caught – and jailed.

Tony Smith, a serial burglar, is one such criminal. In only a few weeks, he stole seven cars and five ATMs during a blatant cross-country crime spree.

Smith, 26, of Cambridgeshire, was incarcerated for seven years and six months in November after admitting to raids in Dorset, Hampshire, Leicestershire, Shropshire, Derbyshire and Staffordshire.

Another raider, Kayne Palmer, 33, was locked up after a violent ram-raid left terrified shop owners trapped upstairs as a stolen van smashed into their business below.

Palmer, 33, was caught on camera ramming into Bestwood Hill Food and Wine in Nottingham using a stolen vehicle in October 2023. 

He was seen stealing £8,000 worth of cigarettes and booze.

CCTV also captured the moment a stolen pickup truck was used in a ram raid at a Tesco Express store in Northwich, Cheshire.

Driver Robin Vaughan stole more than £3,000 in cash as well as a bag of parcels at around 12.40 am on June 16 last year.

The 35-year-old of Lyon Close, St Helens, caused more than £35,000 worth of damage to the store and was incarcerated for three years.

We don’t appear to have a politician with the persuasive power to stop these individuals, and apparently, we don’t have enough police numbers, but there appear to be enough officers when a pub needs raiding, or when police arrest people at 3 am over something they said on a parent’s WhatsApp group. It’s not about numbers; it’s how those numbers are deployed, and that is down to a lack of leadership at the highest levels.

There are CCTV cameras everywhere, so when does a JCB driving down the road not start raising suspicion?

The UK has turned into a soft touch with no deterrents, and because there are no deterrents, it’s hardly surprising and not unexpected that we now have this vile behaviour, and our police are too busy policing protests, rioting and hurty words.

Our police are not powerless to stop these people; they just can’t be bothered investigating because it’s too much hard work. If our spineless police force can’t cope or just don’t want to do anything, bring in the Home Guard.

The whole of the UK has become a laughing stock, and it would be laughable if it weren’t so serious. Our government is allowing it to happen – it’s time for a change, folks!

Phone Numbers From Childhood Remembered By Millions

According to a recent study, millions of Brits who now only use their mobile phones can still recall ancient landline phone numbers from decades ago.

With a year until the January 2027 landline switch-off, a new study suggests half the nation can still recite the telephone number from their childhood home, as well as their family members and school friends.

As the country moves into a totally digital phone future, Talkmobile commissioned the research as a sentimental look back.

For consumers and companies, this implies that landline voice calls will be digitally encoded and transmitted via the internet rather than being carried over the outdated analogue PSTN infrastructure.

While the underlying technology is transforming, the service itself will remain fundamentally the same for users.

The shift to internet-based phone systems promises improved call quality with clearer connections, more competitive pricing through bundled packages, and enhanced security features to combat nuisance and scam calls.

While just under half of UK households still have a landline (47 per cent), millions of Brits still fondly reflect on the days of the family phone book filled with scribbled telephone numbers.

According to the poll of 2,000 adults, three in five Brits (57 per cent) can still recall the landline number they had growing up – increasing to almost seven in ten (68 per cent) for Gen X – aged 45 to 59.

One in five Gen X (21 per cent) can also recall between three and five landline phone numbers off the top of their heads. Millennials – aged 28 to 44 – follow closely at almost two in 10 (18 per cent).

The study showed Boomers – aged 60 to 78 – are the generation most likely to have a landline today at almost two-thirds (64 per cent), while millennials are the least likely at nearly a quarter (27 per cent).

Landlines are already a thing of the past for many young adults – fewer than one in 10 (8 per cent) of Gen Z say they never even had one growing up.

More than half of Brits (55 per cent) no longer own or use a physical phone book; however, a quarter of Boomers (25 per cent) still actively use one.

Talkmobile spokesperson Stuart Wilson said: ‘Landline numbers are ingrained in our memories, even as we move towards a digital-only future.

‘These numbers represent more than just a way to make calls; they’re a connection to our past and the people we love.

‘At Talkmobile, we’re committed to making modern communications as straightforward as those memorable landlines once were.

‘With our industry-leading Trustpilot score of 4.7, we’re proving that great customer service and uncomplicated technology can go hand in hand as we embrace this new era of connectivity.’

The trouble with all of this is that some elderly people still use and depend on a landline, but when everything goes over to digital, there will be no possibility of contacting anyone in an emergency should the internet fail, that’s even if they have the internet in the first place.

This service will not be fundamentally the same. At present, a landline works without internet. Under the new system, it requires an internet connection, so if the internet goes down, you will not be able to use the landline; therefore, I don’t see how this can be called an improvement.

A lot of elderly people have alarm system monitoring, which means that when it is switched over, and the internet goes down, they will not be able to use their alarm system monitoring in an emergency, and you won’t be able to call 999 in an emergency – can you see the problem here?

Slave For 25 Years

A vulnerable woman kept as a house slave for 25 years by a mother-of-ten was failed by social services, a neighbour has said today.

A woman living next to Amanda Wixon, who yesterday was convicted of a ‘Dickensian’ decades-long campaign of abuse and false imprisonment, said she repeatedly rang authorities over concerns for the malnourished woman’s welfare.

Wixon took in the victim as a 14-year-old girl initially for a weekend in 1996, but locked her away in the council house in Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire, until 2021, when the alarm was raised with a secret phone.

The woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons but is now in her 40s, was forced into work and kept in appalling conditions inside the ‘house of horrors’.

Disturbing police footage showed the damp ‘prison’ room that was home to the victim, who was discovered fearful, dirty and without any teeth.

She was punched, stamped on, shoved down the stairs and beaten with a broom, among other abuses. She also had bleach spattered on her face, washing liquid squirted down her neck, and her head flushed in the lavatory.

One of Wixon’s neighbours was a witness in the case against the 56-year-old and says she saw her victim regularly knocking on the windows from inside.

Speaking outside of the court hearing, Kiram, a 33-year-old mother, said that she saw the woman being beaten up, thrown around ‘like a rag doll’, and forced to constantly sit on the floor.

She said: ‘It was disgusting. I’m just so shocked it’s been waiting for so long.

‘I was a neighbour from the age of 13. I mentioned it to my mum because I could see it from my room. I made phone calls to social services, nothing was ever done.’

Kiram continued: ‘Social services failed her massively. She was diagnosed with global developmental delay. And obviously, a lot of other learning difficulties.

‘You could tell that she was vulnerable. The hygiene was not there. It was like a house of horrors. There were a few occasions where she’d come to the window. But that was years later. We didn’t think she was still there.’

Kiram said that she used to see the victim as a child, but then saw nothing of her for a number of years, until around 2016.

She said that during the COVID lockdowns, she saw the woman knocking on windows from the inside, but that ‘nothing was ever said’.

A spokesman for Gloucestershire County Council said: ‘We were first made aware of the tragic situation regarding this individual in 2021 as part of the police investigation, and since that point, our Adult Social Care services have been supporting the victim in this shocking case.’

During a two-week trial, prosecutor Samuel Jones said the modern slavery victim, known as ‘K’, was a vulnerable woman who had effectively ‘disappeared’ from society.

Gloucester Crown Court heard the victim was tightly controlled, rarely allowed to leave the two homes where she had lived with Wixon, required to ask for food, denied washing facilities and medical care and forced to clean extensively, often on her knees.

A jury heard she had been born into a dysfunctional family, and Wixon stepped in to help when they could no longer cope with her.

Jurors were told Wixon had seven children at this point, and soon lodged a benefits claim for the latest child.

Mr Jones told the jury: ‘She was kept in and prevented from leaving the address, and she was assaulted and hit many, many times and forced to work with the threats of violence.

‘She had been denied food and the ability to wash over many years.’

A sickening 42-second clip revealed the damp bedroom, with a filthy mattress and bedding, as well as unpainted walls, which proved to be K’s only refuge as she suffered at the hands of Wixon, whom she dubbed ‘The Witch’. 

The clip captures the moment the officer discovers a gut-wrenching note under her pillow – with phone numbers scribbled on it.

The policeman can be heard heavily breathing as he steps into the room and says, ‘Absolutely filthy bedding.’

Police footage also revealed the moment Wixon was arrested in 2021 when police stormed her home.

The court heard police used voice notes sent by the victim to one of Wixon’s children – in which she expressed fear and said she was unsafe – to help build the case against the defendant, while a neighbour described the victim as resembling ‘something out of a concentration camp’.

Some residents reported seeing the victim being humiliated and abused in the garden; others said they did not see her for long periods of time. When they did, she was often sitting alone at a window, waving.

The court heard that following her removal from the house, the victim initially suffered trauma symptoms and had nightmares about Wixon’s abuse.

A doctor noted large, thick calluses on both ankles, which the victim put down to long hours cleaning floors on her hands and knees, while a dentist said she must have suffered extreme pain at times as a result of her rotting teeth.

But since being rescued from Wixon, the woman’s health has improved, and she has become more independent, jurors were told.

Neighbours described Wixon as a ‘controlling woman’. One said: ‘What has happened is beyond belief.

‘When I first moved here 20 years ago, I would regularly see her (the victim) in the garden.

‘She would be hanging the washing out or tending the garden, but then she disappeared.

‘I thought she had moved, but all the time she must have been in the house.’

According to the neighbour who said she phoned social services, the victim is ‘thriving’ and like a ‘completely different person’ after being liberated five years ago.

Another local, who was not aware of the enslavement, described Wixon as ‘filthy’.

She said of the victim: ‘Obviously, she wasn’t allowed to go to the hospital, the doctors.

‘Social services were always shut down, so how was the family meant to know what was going on? That girl is still suffering, and she lost 25 years of her life.’

Another said: ‘It’s shocking this has happened right next to my house.

‘Amanda just seemed like a normal person, we would greet each other with “hello” and “goodbye”, and that’s it.’

Wixon was found guilty of two counts of requiring a person to perform forced or compulsory labour, one count of false imprisonment and three counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm.

She was cleared of one count of assault occasioning actual bodily harm.

She will be sentenced in March, with the judge telling her a prison term was ‘a certainty’.

Wixon showed no remorse as she left the courthouse on foot with several members of her family. 

Asked if she would like to apologise to her victim, she replied: ‘Why would I say sorry for something I never did?’

A request for more comment has been made to Gloucestershire County Council.

If the victim was regularly seen knocking on the windows, why did no one help this poor woman? Her life could have been significantly different if they had. They should have contacted the police; that should have been their first port of call.

Wixon should get at least 50 years in prison, double what the poor victim had to endure.

Let me guess what will happen through the investigation. The police and social services will say that ‘lessons have been learned.’ That there was a ‘failure of the system,’ and that ‘no one is to blame.’ It’s just rinse and repeat just to cover their backsides.

What has happened to our duty of care in this country? If you see something that is wrong, unjust, cruel or illegal, report it to the proper portals for a response, and don’t quit until you get one.

Emma Thompson Says School Meals Are Unhealthy

Dame Emma Thompson has sparked a backlash after hitting out at ‘unhealthy’ school dinners in a new campaign video.

The Love Actually star, 66, has narrated a new film criticising heads and the Government over ‘ultra-processed food’ (UPF) in schools.

Dame Emma’s intervention comes 20 years after chef Jamie Oliver launched his own crusade against ‘Turkey Twizzlers’ and other processed food in schools – leading to new Government standards for lunches.

The clip, produced for the Food Foundation charity, calls on ministers to better ‘monitor’ school food to ensure it is nutritional.

However, it caused a backlash on social media from those pointing out that many children are picky and refuse to eat a diverse range of foods.

One critic said: ‘Good luck with that! You cannot get them to eat it, they go for a packed lunch instead or don’t eat it, then go hungry.’

A second said: ‘You can’t make kids eat healthy, that old saying comes to mind… You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make them drink it.’

A third said: ‘Another celebrity who hasn’t got a clue.’

The video features a cartoon illustration of a plate of healthy food, which includes red cabbage, lettuce, cucumber, aubergine, potatoes and cherry tomatoes.

A cartoon of a boy eating cereal out of a box is exhibited during the ‘unhealthy food’ part of the video.

Dame Emma says in the video: ‘Four and a half million children in the UK are growing up in poverty. For many, a healthy diet is unaffordable. Fewer than 10 per cent of teenagers eat enough fruit and veg. And we see the impact of this lack of nutrients on those living in the most deprived areas. They’re growing up shorter than other kids.’

She adds: ‘Whilst some schools are managing to cook and serve healthy food, too many are now serving food that is unhealthy and lacking in essential nutrition. It is ultra-processed.’

A young person then says: ‘Ultra-processed food, UPF. It’s cheap, it’s high in calories, but it’s very low in goodness.’

Dame Emma lashes out at the Government for not ‘monitoring what’s happening in the school food system’.

‘We just want to sit down to a school lunch that’s good for us,’ says another young person in the video.

Dame Emma adds: ‘Imagine that. Classrooms would be calmer, children with full tummies ready to learn… Every child has the right to healthy food – let’s get it right in all our schools. Let’s give all our kids a good lunch.’

The film is part of the Food Foundation’s campaign to update food standards in schools to make sure students living in poverty have access to a nutritious, hot meal.

They say current food standards in schools do not take into account recent nutritional recommendations, and compliance with standards is not monitored.

The clip drew mixed responses from parents, school staff and the wider public on social media.

One critic said: ‘You can cook all the nutritious food you like, and schools do, including salad and fruit, but you cannot force a child to eat it. They have a choice to eat what they want. The amount of nutritious food thrown away in primary schools is criminal.’

Another said: ‘I’d like to know the take-up because I hear kids don’t take it up because they don’t like the food.’

A third said: ‘I work in a school and we provide salad pots, hot meals, vegetables, pudding and fruit. A lot of children don’t want to eat the salad pots or the vegetables… We can supply everything, but we cannot force a child to eat anything.’

However, others agreed with Dame Emma, with one saying: ‘I would never put my kids on school dinners, the food is beige central with very little variety, even more so if your kids don’t eat meat.

Another said: ‘Our school has some “interesting” food choices for a primary school that are more fitting for a working men’s club, like a cheese and onion roll.’

Dame Emma, who attended the elite Camden School for Girls in London when it was a grammar school, is known for her activism on food poverty and climate change.

In 2019, she was ridiculed during another nutrition campaign for claiming on TV that students are being refused tap water in schools.

She said poor children are spending their lunch allowance on bottled water, leaving them with hardly any money for food.

The Labour-supporting actress even said water fountains are being broken ‘on purpose’ in some schools to boost bottled water sales.

At the time, the then Tory Government said it ‘did not believe’ her claim because it is illegal for schools to withhold water and those doing so would face sanction. 

Today, Jamie Oliver said: ‘Good school food transforms children’s health, learning, attendance and wellbeing. Yet we still have a system where some children eat well at school, and others don’t. That’s outrageous.

‘School meals are the UK’s biggest and most important restaurant chain, and it’s failing too many of its customers. It’s long past time for government to properly update 20-year-old standards and actually enforce them.’

The Government announced last year it would expand free school meal eligibility to all pupils in England whose families claim Universal Credit.

Anna Taylor, executive director of the Food Foundation, said: ‘Monitoring has to go hand in hand with new standards so that schools which aren’t meeting standards can be given adequate support to improve.

‘There are lots of wonderful examples of schools delivering fantastic food to children – that experience needs to be less of a postcode lottery and instead something which all children can benefit from.’

A Government spokesman said: ‘Through our Plan for Change, we’ve taken the historic step to offer free school meals to every child from a household in receipt of universal credit, reaching over half a million more children and helping us to drive the biggest reduction of child poverty in a single Parliament.

‘The Government is working with experts to revise the School Food Standards as part of our mission to create the healthiest ever generation of children.’

Sadly, Emma Thompson is a champagne socialist, and even though she is a rather good actress, she should focus on acting instead of advising. She is right, though, school dinners are appalling compared to when I was a child – it was real meat and two veg, and a scrummie desert for afters, plus a drink.

It was never about nutritional value; it was about cost-cutting, and that is why we are in the chaos that we are in, but I suppose it could be worse. Some people are starving in poverty-stricken countries, but we are not a poverty-stricken country – there is money, but we’re just not allowed to see it.

If Emma Thompson and Jamie Oliver are so concerned about school dinners, why don’t they just donate some of their money towards feeding the children that they claim to be so worried about?

Growing up in the 70s, my mum would cook proper meat and 2 veg, and schools used to do the same. There were no fussy kids back then; you either ate it or went without, both at school and at home, and there wasn’t an option at home; everyone ate the same. Now kids get asked what they want to eat, rather than just eat what they get.

And why do celebrities think their opinions should have any bearing on anything at all just because they are well-known?

‘Animalistic’ Rape By Failed Asylum Seeker

A failed asylum seeker who raped a woman in her own home while he was staying at a taxpayer-funded hotel has been imprisoned for seven years.

Chret Callender, 28, turned up intoxicated at the victim’s residence and forced himself on her and ‘carried on regardless’ when she told him no.

The young woman was wise enough to capture a large portion of the horrifying event on her phone, which she could then use as proof against Callender.

In the audio clips played to a jury, she was heard crying and telling Callender ‘I have said no, please stop’.

Callender, who is from Trinidad and staying at the Britannia Hotel in Bournemouth, Dorset, was heard saying ‘have some respect for me’ and ‘shut up’.

Later, he apologised to the woman and said he had ‘f…ed up’.

The victim, who can’t be named, said she had spent the evening in Bournemouth Pleasure Gardens with friends, and Callender was there.

At the end of the night, she got a cab home, only for the defendant to later turn up at her door in the early hours of June 14 last year.

She said during the trial: ‘I told him I didn’t want him to come in. I was worried he was going to be loud, and I didn’t want to get in trouble with my housemates.

‘He told me to f*** off a few times. I said, “I’m in my house, I can’t go anywhere, you can leave,” but he said no.

‘I had a blanket wrapped around me, trying to get to sleep.

‘I said “I’m really tired, I just want to go to sleep’ but he wasn’t letting me go to sleep, he just kept talking and trying to argue.

‘That’s when I thought I would record. Because he was under the influence, he might shout at me, so I did think it was a good idea to record in case.”

She told the court that she repeatedly told Callender  ‘no, I don’t want to’ and that he said ‘I need to, I’ll be quick’.

‘I made it clear no means no. He was telling me he didn’t care if I cried,’ she said.

‘I tried pushing him off, but I couldn’t; he kept pushing my hands away. I didn’t feel strong enough to push him off.

‘He was quite forceful, so I couldn’t really move. He grabbed my wrist at one point, I said, “Stop that, you’re hurting me”.

‘When he finished, I went to the bathroom and locked myself in.

‘When I went back to the bedroom, he kept saying I’m sorry, I didn’t know this is how you would react, this isn’t my fault.

‘I was in so much shock, I didn’t know what to say to him. I just sat on my bed for a couple of hours because I couldn’t sleep with him being there.’ 

Callender is a failed asylum seeker whose application to stay in Britain was denied in April 2025.

He is now expected to be deported under the government’s Early Removal Scheme (ERS).

This allows foreign national prisoners in the UK to be deported before their sentence is finished.

The court heard his appeal to stay, launched in April 2025, had been ‘in stasis’ during the trial.

He was staying at the Britannia Hotel in Bournemouth, Dorset, while his appeal went through at the time of the rape two months later in June.

Callender claimed the woman faked the attack when she started recording them. But a jury found him guilty of rape and sexual assault.

He was sentenced at Bournemouth Crown Court, where he received a seven-year prison sentence.

Addressing Callender, His Honour Judge Richard Fuller KC said: ‘The recordings played to the jury were shocking.

‘Despite her calls and repeated pleas, you forced yourself on her as she was face down on her bed and kept her down with your body weight.

‘Throughout, you called her names and told her to shut up and said she needed to respect you in the bedroom, which showed your warped sense of entitlement.

‘You behaved in an animalistic and base way.

‘The sentence, because of your immigration status, may result in deportation to serve any remaining term in your home country, but that’s a matter for the Home Office, not for this court.’ 

The woman said today in her victim impact statement that her life had ‘changed forever and been destroyed’ by Callender’s actions.

She said that since the attack, she had endured panic attacks, nightmares and paranoia, and no longer felt safe in her own home.

She sobbed in court as she said, ‘I believed I was safe with him, and he violated me in such a horrific way, destroying my sense of safety.

‘I was in absolute shock at his betrayal.

‘My life changed completely that night. I now have panic attacks, constant paranoia and no longer feel safe in my home.

‘I fear he may do this to someone else who will have to go through what I endured.

‘It has changed me forever.’

Mitigating, Mary Aspinall-Miles said Callender had arrived in Britain on a lawful visa as his family had been ‘threatened’ in their native Trinidad.

His asylum claim was rejected due to a lack of evidence, prompting him to appeal.

She said he was ‘remorseful’ at how the night had unfolded, and his family was ‘deeply ashamed’ of him.

She said: ‘He made an application for asylum around September 2024 because his family had been the subject of targeted threats.

‘The appeal remained in stasis until this matter was resolved.

‘If there was some way that he could rewind back to that night and not have treated her in that way, he certainly would have taken a different course.

‘His family is deeply ashamed of him, and he is ashamed of himself.’

There is no question that this man should be deported, but there is little possibility that he will be deported. As for refuge from Trinidad, to the best of my knowledge, there are no conflicts or acts of genocide in this stunning nation.

This level of laxity is shocking. Britain has good diplomatic ties with these countries, and asylum should not have been considered – this man should have been sent back within hours of claiming asylum, and Callender is one person that we have heard about, but there are many more like him that we don’t hear about.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started