Powerful Voices Now Argue For A More Subtle And Less Distressing Way Of Learning To Live With The Virus

The steps now being imposed on large regions of the country would be severe and difficult to endure if we had grounds to believe that they would do any good. The problem is that we have no shred of tangible proof that they will help at all.

The vast illogical web of new rules, increasingly impossible to comprehend or follow, looks worryingly like an exasperated endeavour to penalise us for wanting to live ordinary lives and enjoy ourselves.

Go to the pub if you’re prepared to consume a large unhealthy meal with your drink, but not otherwise.

Go to the gym in Manchester but not in Liverpool.

Wear a mask while you walk to your restaurant table, but not while you sit down.

You can’t socialise in your parent’s social bubble, but you can meet them down the pub.

And by the time you’ve worked it all out and what they mean, the rules will have changed again.

The apparent scientific basis for this is feeble beyond belief, as Sir Keir Starmer pointed out before throwing all reason and logic aside, demanding more severe collective punishments, which would incidentally make even more people unemployed and 19 out of the 20 places already compelled to suffer under these authoritarian regimes, no benefit was observed.

And why should it be? When we were first lured into this new way of life by an appeal to our goodwill and benevolence and we were told that a few weeks of self-restraint would save the NHS from being overwhelmed.

Who could resist such a plea? And millions jovially sacrificed their treasured freedoms for the common good, believing they would soon get them back when the job was done.

The NHS was not overwhelmed, and it’s far from clear that it ever would have been, but the weeks passed, and what happened?

We had a serious case of mission creep and somehow the task had now become one never previously attempted or achieved by any society, the virtual suppression of the virus itself.

We were not free to return to our normal lives – on the contrary, every few days brought a new apparent alarm and a cranky and increasingly petulant Matt Hancock, the Health Secretary, did not free us from our bonds.

Restrictions applied on the pretext of safety or security are notoriously difficult to get rid of, and these were of no exception and only after enormous harm had been done to the economy were we permitted to resume something like normal life.

Boris Johnson isn’t giving us any peace of mind. He just mutters out his own rules, and if this virus is as bad as he’s saying, why hasn’t he closed schools et cetera?

Our Government are just trying to control us until they’ve completed their little plan.

And it just makes me wonder if there’s ever going to be a vaccine or is this just money for him and the Government to gain from the pharmaceutical companies?

At the end of the day, we’re all being treated like children and it won’t be long before people start to retaliate back at him.

He can’t keep us all dangling on a string and expect everyone to obey his orders when all he’s telling us is more and more lies – all he wants is control and money and I think we all know now that he couldn’t care less about the British people.

For Young Rohingya Brides, Marriage Means a Dangerous, Deadly Crossing

Haresa measured the days by the moon, waxing and waning over the Bay of Bengal and the Andaman Sea. Her days on the trawler, packed into a space so tight she couldn’t even stretch her legs, seeped into weeks, the weeks into months.

Haresa, 18, said of the other refugees on the boat that people struggled like they were fish flopping around – then they ceased moving.

Dozens of bodies were flung overboard, some beaten and some starved. Haresa’s aunt died, then her brother.

Six full moons after she boarded the fishing boat in Bangladesh with hopes that human traffickers would transport her to Malaysia for an arranged marriage – Haresa, who goes by one name and almost 300 other Rohingya refugees found refuge in Indonesia – her sister, 21, died two days after the boat anchored.

Exiled from their homes in Myanmar and packed into refugee settlements in neighbouring Bangladesh, thousands of Rohingya have taken the dangerous boat crossing to Malaysia, where many from the oppressed minority group struggle as undocumented workers – hundreds have died along the way.

Most of those now embarking on the trip, like Haresa, are girls and young women from refugee camps in Bangladesh whose parents have promised them in marriage to Rohingya men in Malaysia – two-thirds of those who anchored in Indonesia with Haresa were female.

Amira Bibi and her family fled their native Rakhine State, in Myanmar’s far west, as the military torched hundreds of Rohingya villages three years ago. The fourth of nine siblings, she said she knew her place in life.

She said that her parents were getting old and her brothers were with their own families, so how long were her parents going to endure the burden of her?

She said through the matchmaking of a cousin in Malaysia who worked as a grass cutter, her parents found a fiancee for her – she asked details about the man but none were provided, apart from his name.

After surviving more than six months at sea in a failed endeavour to contact him, she spoke from Indonesia with her fiancee a country away. The phone call lasted two minutes. She said he sounded young and that was the extent of what she knew about him.

Ms Bibi originally told staff from the United Nations refugee agency that she was 15 years old, but later amended her age to 18 – child marriage is common among the Rohingya, particularly in rural communities.

You only have to look at their faces to see that they’re terrified, traumatised and in various states of shock.

This is human trafficking, and yet it seems that it’s okay to traffick them because they’re female and it’s maddening and a nightmare with no end in sight.

This is awful and these innocent girls should be protected, although some might say that it’s none of our business and that their culture is not ours to meddle with, but in some cultures, they don’t have a choice in life.

Many of these children aren’t allowed to be children because they’re terrorised and then shipped off to marry a man that’s not of their choosing. However, many don’t want this kind of life, yet it’s forced upon them, especially if they don’t obey the rules – makes my discipline as a child of being sent to my room pale in comparison.

We should never be afraid of not having a choice in life, wondering what kind of life that will be – having all our power taken away.

We should all have the ability to choose, particularly women, but these young girls don’t have any rights or support from their families because they come from a different world entirely and the world needs to know about this.

Experts Argue Boris Johnson’s Thin EU Deal Will Provoke Major Economic Disorder

The former boss of the Brexit department has warned that the narrow EU deal sought by Boris Johnson will act as a deadweight on Britain’s capacity to trade, amid growing concerns that the country remains dangerously ill-prepared for such an outcome.

Negotiations with the EU remained stuck after Downing Street told EU intermediaries not to bother making a planned trip to London without offering a fundamental change of approach.

The Prime Minister stopped short of calling off talks, which will continue this week and in a sign of the severity of business unease, with more than 70 trade associations and professional bodies issuing an extraordinary joint plea to both sides to etch out a deal.

However, there are concerns within Government and industry that the alarming threat of a no-deal outcome has camouflaged the impact of a thin EU deal on trade. While a deal with remove tariffs on trade, significant non-tariff barriers will be imposed, adding weighty costs on manufacturers and practical hardships for hauliers, while the UK’s large services sector is also expected to be subject to new barriers, and Philip Rycroft, who ran the Brexit department until last year, said that intermediaries were hammering out the extent of new barriers to trade.

He said that no deal is worse than a deal, but that it was just worth remembering, customs declarations, security declarations, regulatory checks, rules of origin and compliance, all of the panoply of a border applies if they get a deal – either way, it’s a huge logistical challenge and an extremely pricey one.

He said that you have the short term impact, but then you have a dead weight on trade forever, because that’s the nature of being out of the EU’s single market and that it puts discord into our trading relationship with the EU and that disagreement equals cost and that it will transform the nature of the trade relationship between the United Kingdom and the EU.

Talks held last week between the Cabinet Office and industry figures saw both sides voice concerns over-eagerness for the change expected in January.

Industry disquiet also remains around the readiness of a new border computer system, as well as the impact on sectors such as financial, legal and business services.

Ben Fletcher, executive director of policy at Make UK, said even the best deal now on offer was a long way from the kind of deal that was being discussed as a starting point during Theresa May’s discussions, which itself was an extremely long way from the status quo.

We should never have left the EU because now we won’t have control over anything, but whatever happens now, we’re leaving and it’s about time everyone quit whining about it and looked forward before they get left behind so that we can get ready for our oven-ready chlorinated chickens.

Of course, no deal has, for numerous years been a considerable risk, and those that went that route will ultimately find out that it’s the EU’s strategic interest to make it rough for us in the United Kingdom, and in the event of a no-deal the EU will make an example of the United Kingdom, it’s not personal, it’s business.

Boris Johnson has single-handedly annihilated the British nation thanks to his mishandling of the coronavirus and Brexit discussions. We will never be as robust again and we will vanish into obscurity as the union gradually breaks up – he’s obliterated the United Kingdom and isolated us from long term allies and friends.

Corbynites Create Policy Group To Resist Sir Keir Starmer

A group of Labour MPs have established their own policy research operation amid rising left-wing opposition to the leadership of Sir Keir Starmer.

In a break with colleagues from the mainstream of the party, several supporters of Jeremy Corbyn are using parliamentary office expenses to finance the Socialist Parliamentary Research Group (SPRG).

The pooled research and writing service has motivated comparisons with the European Research Group that sustained generations of Conservative Brexiteers in their guerilla campaign to redirect the Tory position on Europe and ultimately brought about the ousting of Theresa May as Prime Minister.

Of course, it would be awesome if Sir Keir Starmer made a difference, but so far all he’s done is a big fat nothing and there are some people out there that still won’t stop for their comrade Jeremy Corbyn.

Jeremy Corbyn is finished, well for now anyhow, and to be fair, Sir Keir Starmer probably won’t do any better, and it’s doubtful he will ever lead this country.

Instead, we find ourselves with an inept Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, but what we really need is a credible leader with credible policies, and these people don’t really want to be in Government, they just want to taunt from the sidelines, but not deal with any decision making.

What we need now is a realistic and devoted Government, and it’s about time we had some opposition to the Tories, other than Labour.

Moment Grandmother Lets Her Grandchild Drop To The Floor

A video showing a grandmother faced with the most difficult of dilemmas, whether to save a glass of bubbles from falling to the floor or her young grandchild, has gone viral.

The solution for the lady in question, thought to be from the United States, was indeed at the base of the flute, and the laughable clip shows the baby hurtling floor-bound while the glass of fizz is saved, albeit with half of its contents gone.

The video, entitled ‘And Grandmother of the year award goes to…’ was posted to Imgur earlier this week, has already had more than six million views since it was also shared to Twitter.

On Twitter, opinion was divided over the lady’s actions, with many saying that the grandmother should have put the child first, others defended her, saying she could have contained a more serious accident by preventing the glass from breaking.

In the brief clip, the baby, sporting a navy striped onesie, reaches for his grandmother’s tall glass, which was perched on the coffee table.

When the woman notices, she moves quickly to take the glass out of the infant’s hand and becomes so consumed with rescuing its contents, she released her supporting hand from the baby’s waist.

The unavoidable ensues and the baby falls sideways to the floor before just his feet are visible in the picture.

@T54350877 wrote that she could have easily just picked up the baby instead of dropping the baby to save her half a glass of wine.

@Musmu1203 was among those defending the actions of the grandmother, saying that if the glass had fallen with the baby, it would have broken and the baby would have been hurt and that she did the right thing.

@Matt_Dean1994 added that as a parent, she should have let the baby fall, that babies bounce and that when they fall they’re okay almost every time. That the glass could have broken and the baby would have been at risk of cutting itself on the fragments of glass.

Of course, it’s an involuntary reaction to grab something that’s falling. It was an accident, and I’m sure she didn’t mean to let the baby fall, she just reacted, automatically.

Perhaps she did the right thing, otherwise, the child would have cut himself to shreds, and it seems that this has been made into a bigger thing than was needed, although it would have been a much bigger thing with the baby being rushed to the Emergency Room.

I would sooner my baby have a bruised bottom, than a fragment of glass in it from the smashed flute, and seeing as the child was already standing on the floor, they weren’t going to fall very far, although it does beggar belief why this child was allowed to walk around while there was glassware about.

DEATH CRASH

Robert and Paula Bateman were travelling with their daughters, Lexi, ten, and 18-month-old Elizabeth when their Ford Focus smashed into Luke Norton’s van.

Both parents were reported dead at the location of the horror smash, while their two children survived.

Lexi was helped out of the Ford by Luke Norton, and tragically asked witnesses if her dad was still alive and to please let her mum be alive.

Luke Norton had binged on a considerable amount of cocaine and some heroin the night before the double tragedy on September 3 and when he was tested for drugs, he was four times the legal limit of benzoylecgonine, the main metabolite of cocaine.

He’s now been imprisoned for eight years and eight months after he admitted causing the deaths of Robert, 36, and Paula, 35, by dangerous driving.

The driver also pleaded guilty to driving a motor vehicle with an excess amount of the drug benzoylecgonine in his blood.

A charge of causing Lexi serious injuries by dangerous driving was dropped by prosecutors at Peterborough Crown Court.

Judge Sean Enright said that he’d robbed two children of their parents.

The court was told Luke Norton was completely disorientated when he got behind the wheel on the A142 between Chatteris and Mepal, Cambs.

He’d made 15 calls through the night between 10.17 pm on September 2 and 7.45 am the following day, including a 20-minute call at 5.15 am.

Luke Norton drove straight across the road and head-on into the Ford Focus at about 8 pm and when he was taken to hospital as a precaution, Luke Norton was sluggish and unable to stay awake.

He said he must have fallen asleep at the wheel but asserted he didn’t remember feeling tired or sleepy before the collision.

John Farmer, prosecuting, said that there was only one explanation, a medley of an absence of sleep, drugs, disorientation, and he disintegrated into falling asleep and that there was no steerage, no braking, he just drove across the road, into the darkness and that Mr Bateman had no time, hope or chance of doing anything.

In a victim impact statement, Paula’s mum Angela Harper paid tribute to her wonderful, caring and supportive daughter who was adored by all and she described how Lexi sat next to her dead father and watched her mother die while still having the compassion to look after her younger sister.

Angela Harper added that the two young girls were now at the epicentre of her life due to a person so irresponsible that they caused this terrible event which would affect them all and numerous others for the rest of their lives.

Was this murder? Of course, it was. This guy got behind the wheel of his vehicle, knowing that he’d taken drugs, yet still got behind the wheel of his van, and no way is this punishment long enough.

Those poor children now have no parents and that’s their life sentence and our justice system needs sorting out because the moment you get behind the wheel under the influence, you’re showing total disregard for any other road user or pedestrian.

A vehicle is a lethal weapon, particularly when the motorist is under the influence of drugs or drink and anyone who drives under the influence should have their licence taken away for life, as well as a jail sentence.

There are numerous people out there that kill with a gun or a knife, he just skilled himself with drugs and a car, no difference – he took lives and this was yet another Andrex judge on the bench giving out a far too lenient punishment.

Angela Merkel Warns Germany Is On The Brink Of Coronavirus Disaster

The German Chancellor has hit back at local leaders in the country for not supporting her tough coronavirus restrictions.

Angela Merkel took part in a marathon six-hour meeting with Germany’s sixteen state leaders to urge them to do more to stop the resurgent virus.

It comes as EU countries have reported their highest ever daily calculations of new virus cases, as deaths start to climb back to spring levels and behind closed doors, Angela Merkel was enraged with the local leaders for refusing to enforce restrictive new measures to impede the virus.

Germany’s federal system permits state Government reserves to override the Chancellors measures and gives them the final say on whether to enforce new laws and Angela Merkle said she was not happy with the leader’s refusal to accept curfews and a limit on gatherings.

She added that what they’d agreed was not enough to avert disaster.

The state leaders agreed to an 11 pm curfew on bars and restaurants, along with a ten-person limit on social gatherings. The leaders also agreed to make the use of face masks mandatory in busy indoor spaces.

Angela Merkle also noted during the meeting, Germany’s cases yesterday were tripling weekly and she said that what bothered her was the exponential rate of increase and that they had to stop that, otherwise, it wouldn’t end well.

It comes as Germany reported its highest ever daily case toll of the virus, at 6,638 yesterday and it demonstrates that the coronavirus is spreading through Germany at the same pace it was at the peak of the pandemic, with the last time the country reporting over 6,000 cases in April.

It takes the country to a total of 352,107 cases according to John Hopkins University and yesterday also saw Germany record a further 33 deaths from the virus.

Angela Merkel told the leaders neighbouring countries to Germany were having to take extremely drastic measures to beat back their surges in cases.

France reported more than 100 deaths per day on average this week, with President Emmanuel Macron’s Government declaring a public health state of emergency yesterday and under the state of emergency, Paris and eight other cities were thrown into a 9 pm curfew for four weeks.

He added that they need to get from 20,000 cases per day to 2 or 3,000.

Other European leaders declared harsh new measures as they began losing control of the virus’s spread.

Of course, some of this is founded on lies, fears and scare stories, plus they’re now telling us that we can’t return to normal and that we need a new normal, hinting towards their New World Order reset.

Boris Johnson was a good one, with him saying that we need to build back better and he said numerous times that we can’t go back to the way things were.

These leaders have no intention of going back to what life was like before coronavirus and it seems that they’re using fear scare stories and lies to brainwash the people into believing they need more protection and safety.

Combine that with climate change, saying that they need to bring in measures to save the earth, but what they really mean is they want to restrict what you do by taking your rights away and that it’s our fault and they’ve been calling temporary measures the new norm from the start.

Indian Jewellery Brand Forced To Remove Advert

Cyberbullying has yet again forced a major Indian brand to withdraw an advert featuring a story of communal harmony among Hindus and Muslims.

Jeweller Tanishq met with an online backlash for running an advert showcasing an interfaith marriage between a Hindu woman and a Muslim man.

A representative for the company told a news outlet that the commercial featured a Muslim family celebrating the baby shower of their Hindu daughter in law has now been removed.

The YouTube narrative of the commercial read: “She is married into a family that loves her like their own child. Only for her, they go out of their way to celebrate an occasion that they usually don’t. A beautiful confluence of two different religions, traditions, and cultures.”

Critics, however, accused the company of promoting ‘love jihad’, a conspiracy theory coined by Hindu right-wing fringe groups believe that Muslim men endeavour to woo Hindu women and marry them, to convert them to Islam.

The advertisement received tremendous backlash from people accusing it of being anti-Hindu, and the sheer magnitude of trolling targeting the company saw #BoycottTanishq sit as one of the top trends on Indian Twitter throughout the whole of Monday – employees and directors of the company were also among those targeted.

Talking to a news outlet, activist Saket Gokhale describes the concept of ‘love jihad’ as an extension of the rising Islamophobia in Indian society.

“If you look at the social media accounts of those outraging (against Tanishq), they are always connected to the BJP (the ruling party of India) in some way or the other.”

He said that with every subsequent boycott campaign they keep pushing the Islamophobic agenda.

It began with people boycotting the brands that (Bollywood) actor Aamir Khan supports, after his wife’s remark about feeling unsafe in India, followed by a campaign against any restaurant offering halal food, to any mention of Hindu-Muslim unity.

Mr Gikhale hailed the withdrawal of the advert disappointing and heartbreaking.

He said that the ad wasn’t making any political statement and that there has to be a basis for taking something back, it can’t just be trolling.

A spokesman for Tanishq said that the idea behind the Ekatvam campaign was to celebrate the coming together of people from various walks of life, local communities and families during these difficult times to celebrate the beauty of oneness, but this film stimulated divergent and extreme reactions, contrary to its very objective.

It seems that humans are always looking for reasons to despise each other. It’s all about imaginary titles and it’s horrible, why can’t people just accept each other?

There are loads of families that are not very accepting of their mixed-race partners, but then parents all over the world disapprove of their children’s choices for all kinds of reasons, but to attack an advert is just insane.

It was just an advertisement and this extreme hostility is indeed disdainful and disgraceful and it’s shameful and sad when love can’t overcome hatred.

A newborn baby has no religion, but contractors of our societies teach us how to behave towards one another, and if people choose to marry each other because of love, why should anyone interfere, it’s their choice.

Religion was invented to divide and control, very much like politics, and the world would be a much better place if we didn’t look down on each other all the time. Unfortunately, women in some countries are looked at mainly as property or chattel, and wouldn’t be permitted to marry outside their religion or caste.

Boris Johnson’s Political Fear Is Beginning To Show

Fear is information, and Boris Johnson’s ill-judged address to his virtual party conference last week, in which he decided to not focus on the virus but on the bold future that lay on the other side of the crisis, told us something – it told us that the British Prime Minister is terrified.

The charitable explanation for the speech is that knowing he was about to announce important new COVID 19 constraints, Boris Johnson wanted to deliver hope with a picture of the United Kingdom after the pandemic.

However, right now, all that people want to hear about is how the crisis will end, not how the Conservative party will hold thereafter, and plans for a better tomorrow ring hollow if he can’t deliver a functioning test and trace system today.

A more confident leader would have squared up to the issues, rather than endeavouring to divert the issues and it’s not about learning to live with the virus, it’s about asking how many deaths is too many? And also how many families are they happy and willing to sacrifice?

But Boris Johnson no longer looks like a guy who believes in what he’s doing and he’s losing control of the pandemic, he’s losing control of the narrative and he’s losing the control of his party.

Thrust into policies he despises, he’s struggling to regain his political compass and is running scared of the rebellious MPs, of the right-wing press which has now turned on him, and his chancellor, Rishi Sunak, whose positive approval ratings among party members contrast with his own negative rating.

The British public did not blame Boris Johnson for the situation and recognise that all decisions are challenging, but the continued failures are sapping his support.

Boris Johnson sees that the second wave can be linked to Government mistakes and yet, even in his latest plans splitting regions by infection levels, multiple tiers and responses to infection levels, there’s confusion where there needs to be transparency and confrontational actions, such as pub curfews, which are bounced through and never really defended.

Those around the Prime Minister still lash out at the failures of others. They condemn the smug, centralising tendency of Whitehall, which they say has hobbled the effect of test and trace rollout, or what one senior insider dubbed ‘the health deep state’.

None of these points is devoid of merit, but the crisis has raged for months, so when is the responsibility theirs? And increasingly, they sound like mourners at their own funeral.

The irony is that Boris Johnson has a tenable plan. The Government has prioritised hospitals, schools and most of the economy over socialising and the hospitality sector.

We can quibble over the specifics of his latest constraints, but there appears to be a precise, underlying principle and hopefully, it will be the right one, but he doesn’t know what to do or where to start, letting other people decide for him, which was his greatest blunder and failure.

But not to worry, Boris Johnson will probably stand down in the new year after the shock of Brexit hits home. That’s what they generally do, pass the buck to someone else so that they can take the flack.

However, it’s always easier to criticise when you’re not in the driver’s seat, and now that Boris Johnson’s in the hot seat, I bet it’s not so much fun.

Consultants Fees Up To £6,250 A Day For Work On COVID Test System

Sources have confirmed that management consultants are being paid as much as £6,250 a day to work on the British government’s struggling coronavirus testing system.

Senior executives from Boston Consulting Group (BCG) are being paid fees equivalent to £1.5 million a year to help speed up and reorganise the £12 billion network that Boris Johnson said in May would be world-beating.

The figures, first disclosed by Sky News, came amid increasing concern about the cost of the UK’s COVID 19 testing system, which has been criticised for being slow, disorganised and unable to cope with growing demand.

A source with knowledge of the contract said that BCG is one of the biggest and most prestigious consultancies in the world. Charging £10 million for 40 people to work on the virus test and trace programme, over four months.

Sources confirmed that individual consultants from the firm could make £2,400 a day with the most senior consultants earning up to £7,360. BCG then offered discounts of between 10 per cent and 15 per cent on other parts of the project.

Publicly available data collated by the Spend Network shows that BCG has been granted contracts worth at least £18.3 million for work related to the pandemic.

This included two £5 million contracts for strategic support and digital support for the test and trace programme. A £4.5 million contract with the Department for International Development for a project on accelerated COVID economic support, and £1.6 million for a COVID 19 consultancy task force from the Cabinet Office.

Other projects include work on the UK’s food security and guidance on vaccine manufacturing.

The rates far outstrip those paid to public sector workers, with just 1 per cent of civil servants being paid more than £80,000 a year.

The coronavirus test and trace system tumbled last month after schools reopened following the lockdown. Figures on 17 September revealed that almost nine in 10 of all COVID 19 tests in England were taking longer than 24 hours to yield results.

Since then, the Government has relied upon private sector involvement, while Lady Harding, the head of the programme, has faced calls for her resignation.

BCG’s forty workers are only a tiny sliver of the 1,000 consultants employed by Deloitte on the system.

It materialised last month that staff from consulting firms, including KPMG, have been put on standby to work on back-office parts of the system on a short term basis over the next six months – among the firms believed to have been contacted for help was EY.

It seems funny how some people are out there making vast sums of money, while the remainder of the people are unemployed with no prospect of a job and are being treated like Typhoid Mary and this has to be one of the most flawed presentations of corruption in a developed country that we’ve seen.

Every week there’s a news story about how our Government is paying an associate of a member of the Government to furnish a service they can only truly be outsourced to an expert because they’ve no previous experience of delivering that particular service.

Firstly, just the knowledge that the Government is handing out contracts without tender to associates, would raise eyebrows – and what’s the likelihood that they’re the best supplier for the service the Government could find?

The absence of tender is a bit of a dead giveaway that the Government isn’t looking for the best supplier, but then it’s up to you to consider the consequences, and it’s even worse than you might have feared.

Utter incompetence in the delivery of services essential to the country’s navigation through and recovery from COVID.

This is how our Government gives our money away and the disdain they have for us is astounding and yet some people would still vote for them and if they actually got the job done, then I wouldn’t bat an eyelid.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started