Elderly Prefer Death To Spending Christmas Without Family

An expert has claimed that elderly people would surrender their safety to spend Christmas with their families as it’s more important to many than staying alive.

If coronavirus constraints mean they’re unable to do so, numerous elderly people will be crippled by loneliness.

The stark warning comes from 85-year-old Baroness Greengross, who is one of the UK’s leading experts on ageing and the former director-general of the charity Age Concern advised ministers to buffer constraints in the run-up to the festive season.

And she said: ‘What do we do about elderly people who long to see their family at Christmas and it looks as if they’ll not be able to? That’s absolutely awful’.

She continued: ‘I think I would make an announcement just before Christmas that relaxed some of the rules because most older people with families would prioritise seeing them, I think, overstaying alive.’

Baroness Greengross said that she fears constraints to prevent the spread of the coronavirus have come at the expense of many people’s quality of life.

Everyone deemed vulnerable to coronavirus symptoms was urged to shield themselves earlier this year when the virus took hold of the country. This included anyone aged over 70, who were vulnerable to the disease because of their advanced age.

For the past six months, many have been cut off from their families and unable to see their loved ones as much as they would have wanted, but Baroness Greengross said to not see them for Christmas would be an added disappointment.

With more stringent coronavirus constraints being introduced as the country wrestles with a wave of cases of the virus, she hopes Government ministers will recognise this while setting out their plans for December.

Baroness Greengross has been a relentless defender of the rights of the elderly since entering the House of Lords cross benches in 2000 and according to the Campaign To End Loneliness, there are nine million lonely people in the United Kingdom and four million of them are more senior people.

More than a million older people also say they go for over a month without speaking to a friend, neighbour or family member and Ester Rantzen, who founded The Silver Line, a free confidential helpline that provides the elderly with information, friendship and advice, previously said that once our elderly are self-isolating, we need to protect them not only from the virus but from the emotional impairment caused by loneliness.

Many grandparents are fed up with the restrictions and enjoy hugging their grandchildren, socialising with family and close friends – sometimes in groups larger than six – going to the shops and some having holidays.

Life is for living, however long we’ve got – it’s a virus, not Ebola. I know that I’ll be having Christmas and no one is going to care who’s in my home over the Christmas period.

Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Doctor Mike Yeadon said that the second wave was fabricated on false-positive COVID tests and that it was being founded on Government policy, economic policy, civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six in a group, all based on, what might be, totally bogus data on the coronavirus.

Eat, drink and be merry. As they say, every day is Christmas despite being vulnerable and shielded and whilst I disagree with how the Government have managed most things, I have upheld what has been asked of me.

Christmas however, is one time of the year where I would resent not being able to spend time with my friends and family, and some families that have very old grandparents and great grandparents, well, how many more Christmas’s will they be able to spend with them?

And it’s frustrating that people are permitted to work 10-12 hours a day in a tin can, but can mingle with 25,000 customers every week, let alone in the run-up to Christmas, but our families aren’t allowed to spend just one day with their families and friends.

SAGE Scientists Suggested A Plan For Everyone Over The Age Of 45 To Shield At Home

Scientists advising the Government on coronavirus considered a plan to ask everyone ever the age of 45 years old to shield and it was recommended that those over 45 years old were at greater risk from the virus and more likely to die from it, so could be segmented from the rest of the population.

The proposal, announced in papers from the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), was ultimately advised against, as it was considered unlikely to be successful.

However, it’s being kept under consideration, and news of it follows a similar option drawn up by officials to potentially target over the 50s with another lockdown.

The minutes of the 48th meeting of the SAGE scientists held on July 23, said that although the under 45s were at less risk from COVID 19, including lower risk of death, they’re still at some risk and that the long term effects were not well understood.

The document adds that around two-thirds of people in the United Kingdom live in a household which includes one or more individuals aged 45 and above and any segmentation founded on this age threshold would therefore affect most households.

The segmentation looked at would have involved those over 45 shielding, which earlier in the pandemic meant staying at home and sidestepping unnecessary contact with others.

Minutes from July 16 note there is likely to be merit in segmenting society by age, especially to vulnerable people and those likely to have more contact with vulnerable people.

It continues that data indicates that people tend to have more connections with others around their own age, but also have a substantial number of connections with those 20-30 years older and younger than themselves, likely to mostly be contacts between parents and children and that there’s also a significant level of contact between grandparents and children.

Figures reveal that children and those aged below 45 years old are at far lower risk of dying from coronavirus than those aged over 75 years old and the Office for National Statistics data shows only four COVID 19 deaths were documented in children aged one to 14 years old in England and Wales or less than 0.01 per cent of the total and that 574 have been recorded in those aged 15 to 44, or 0.96 per cent of the total.

In comparison, 39,058 people aged 75 years old and over have died from the virus or 65 per cent of the total.

So, does that mean that if all over 45s are locked down, does this mean that schools will close and the police as well?

Clearly, this isn’t going to happen because 45 years old is far too young and they should put it at 50-55 years old because typically most children have flown the nest by this time and 50 years old is where illness really has the most significant impact.

And there are a lot of workplaces where about 80 per cent of workers are aged 45 years old. So, if they’re thinking of shielding all 45-year-olds, this will mean that school kitchens will have to shut down, as well as a lot of other places, but go ahead Boris, further tank the economy into oblivion.

But then over 45s are increasingly being made redundant in the workplace, so why don’t we just lock them up, the next step will follow by putting them into old people’s homes.

And my sleep feels like a nasty dream and then I wake up and realise that it’s actually happening and that it wasn’t just a bad nightmare.

So, 44 is safe, but you reach 45 and you’re not safe anymore and unexpectedly this virus has become extraordinarily innovative. No, it’s not the virus that’s become extremely innovative, it’s our Government and things have become extremely convenient for them.

Is The COVID Curfew Doing More Harm Than Good?

Hoards of revellers headed to the streets in their droves last night after bars and pubs booted them out at 10 pm, assembling in huge gatherings and violating social distancing rules.

Vast swathes of Saturday night drinkers were seen downing pints on empty roads in Soho, London, while others rushed to buy alcohol from off licences in Leeds after the newly imposed rules meant venues closed early.

Boozed fuelled masses also assembled at the popular Harbourside area in Bristol and on the streets of nightlife hotspot Newcastle.

The inflow of merry revellers elevated the risk of spreading the virus even more as they crowded together on public transport after Uber fares swelled by 2.6 per cent due to increased demand in London.

The Prime Minister’s decision to impose the 10 pm curfew has been hit by criticism after it was announced the move was not supported by SAGE, the panel of scientific experts chaired by Sir Patrick Vallance.

According to a news outlet, SAGE members are said to be increasingly frustrated that they’re being vetoed while simultaneously being scapegoated for the more drastic measures.

A former World Health Organisation director, Professor Karol Sikora, also highlighted concerns, asking, where is the evidence? And that closing a little earlier will just hurt so many business owners.

SAGE scientists are reportedly calling on the Government to release their advice to exonerate them from any part in mooting a pub curfew.

It comes as homes in the Welsh town of Llanelli were barred from entering each other’s homes and gardens from 6 pm, with the nation’s two largest cities of Cardiff and Swansea following suit.

Residents are also prohibited from entering or leaving the areas without a good reason.

It comes after lockdowns were already imposed in large swathes of the North East and North West of England and more than a quarter of the United Kingdom is under tighter restrictions, including half of the Welsh population.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock said there had been an acceleration of COVID 19 cases across the country, particularly in the North West and the North East and that working alongside their scientific and public health experts and local leaders, they were prepared to take quick and assertive measures to facilitate the transmission of the virus and protect communities.

He also said that he recognised the burden and impact these additional measures have on our daily lives but that we must act collectively and quickly to bring down infections.

There’s a 98.5 per cent survival rate in the United Kingdom and yet the Government are locking people up, well the Government should get over themselves because this has gone too far and now they’re just trying to control us.

And not only that, they’re doing it while taking the proverbial piddle. First, they lock us down, then they say we can go to eat out and they will let us eat out at half price, which we all thought was fantastic.

But they also told everyone they could go back to work. Now they’re just locking us down entirely. So, they took our freedom away and then delivered it to us on a plate and now they’re taking it away again – it’s like a game to them.

And I don’t know if anyone has realised but police states have curfews – this is just dictatorship.

It’s just a shame the UK Government wasn’t intelligent enough and gracious enough to spend money on essential things like preparation for this widely anticipated global pandemic rather than endeavouring to buy peoples votes, now we’re all paying for it, some of us with our lives.

Anti-lockdown Protesters Fight With Police

Anti lockdown protesters fought with police after at least 15,000 demonstrators descended on Trafalgar Square as part of a demonstration against coronavirus measures in the United Kingdom.

Attendees of the ‘We Do Not Consent’ rally ditched their masks as they crowded into the London square, despite Metropolitan Police pleading with people to adhere to Britain’s coronavirus restrictions.

Crowds, who were also warned that violence would not be tolerated at the assemblage, held placards reading ‘is this freedom?’ and ‘end the crazy rules’ as they herded to central London to protest against Britain’s coronavirus constraints.

Piers Corbyn, 73, brother of ex-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, was among the crowd alongside conspiracy theorist David Icke, 68, who has made a succession of false assertions linking COVID 19 to 5G technology.

Demonstrators ditched their face masks and ignored social distancing measures as they hollered ‘we will win’ and waved flags before the Metropolitan Police arrived to close down the event as crowds had not complied with the conditions of their risk assessment.

Skirmishes broke out between protestors and police later in the day, with those in attendance chanting ‘shame on you’ and pushing officers as they passed through the packed populace.

In one moment, a woman appeared to be knocked to the ground as a struggle broke out behind her.

In a statement, Scotland Yard said the violation had put people in danger of transmitting the virus which voided their risk assessment and left those at the event no longer exempt from COVID 19 restrictions.

The force said that they asked those in Trafalgar Square to vacate as officers engaged with the masses. The Met also confirmed that ten people had been apprehended following demonstrations with four officers injured, two requiring hospital treatment.

The demonstration came as nearly 18 million Britons, a quarter of the population, will be living under tighter coronavirus restrictions after the United Kingdom reported a record 6,874 new cases.

Those in Leeds were prohibited from socialising with other households at homes or in pubs, bars, restaurants and parks, as Wigan, Stockport and Blackpool also saw draconian measures brought into force.

Households in the Welsh town of Llanelli are set to be barred from entering each other’s homes and gardens, with the nation’s two largest cities of Cardiff and Swansea to follow suit.

Residents will also be banned from entering or leaving the areas without a reasonable excuse.

The protestors looked like a good cross-section of society with people attired in everyday clothing, not for a fight and they were unarmed but were met by a pack of heavily protected state police fitted with body armour, crash helmets and batons.

The protest was peaceful, well, it was until the police turned up, and if these protestors want to put themselves at risk of the virus, then it’s up to them, and the sooner everyone gets it the better because herd immunity seems to have worked extremely well in Sweden, they definitely don’t believe in taking their countries freedoms away.

Well done to the FREEDOM FIGHTERS – you believed in the cause and no one was paying you or buying you, you did this because you believe in a future for all of us and the more restrictions we accept the more we will get.

There will be no back to normal if we follow the rules and if we accept these constraints things will get worse. Yes, numerous people have had coronavirus and it is real, but the loss of our freedoms concerns me more.

And when this vaccine for COVID 19 is rushed through, you can bet your bottom dollar it will be compulsory, and we are giving up our rights already with most saying it’s for our own good, with folks saying that if we do as we’re told, things will return to normal.

The constraints will get worse, the vaccine will eventually be compulsory, no matter what the side effects are because by then we would have given up our freedoms and it’s an extremely slippery slope, and remember this when your newborn is being vaccinated with God knows what, then maybe we will see that giving up our rights was not such a good idea.

NHS COVID-19 App ‘Bug’ Refuses To Let Users Enter Negative Test Results

It was revealed that people in England using the NHS Track and Trace app are unable to enter a negative test result if they didn’t use it to book their swab, but when users tell it they have coronavirus symptoms, either a high temperature, new persistent cough or loss of taste or smell, the app instantly launches a 14-day self-isolation countdown and advises them to get tested.

However, if they don’t book through the device, it won’t let them enter a negative result or turn off the countdown – the Department for Health and Social Care said the app will be updated.

Hundreds of people who downloaded the app after its takeoff on Thursday, when they had already booked a test, have experienced issues with the app.

Professor Deborah Ryan, from the University of Portsmouth, said that the bug was confusing as the app doesn’t tell you that you can’t enter negative tests booked outside of it.

She added that the app still tells you to quarantine if you entered symptoms, which means you can’t turn off the self-isolation alert in the app.

Test results from swabs by the Office for National Statistics surveys, NHS Hospitals or Public Health England also can’t be entered into the app, meaning it may miss people who need to self-isolate.

More than four million people have downloaded the much-touted software over the past three days, with experts warning they need half of the United Kingdom to get the device for it to be effective.

The coronavirus apps launched in Scotland and Northern Ireland have not experienced these issues and the Department of Health said the use of the app was entirely voluntary and advice to get a test or self-isolate couldn’t be enforced.

At a press conference on Thursday Professor Christophe Fraser, who helped to design the app, said it would be effective at impeding the spread of the virus if it was downloaded by just 15 per cent of people.

He said, this about the benefit to the person in your local network and that the answer was that you need to download the app for it to have an effect for you and on your personal social network and that you need to encourage your friends and family to do the same.

But is this another brainiac app, purely designed to control the people? And should we really download the app? Yes, of course, be responsible, but certainly don’t pander to the power monsters et cetera.

It seems getting tested is a new trend, but then I hear that bulk buying toilet roll is making a comeback. In the end, they won’t need you to have an app on your phone to track you and our Government will have a lot to explain and isn’t our Government clever, they’re letting us govern ourselves rather than the bureaucrats and we don’t even realise it.

Here’s a suggestion, why don’t we all congregate on our doorsteps at 8 pm and clap loudly and clank pots and pans to scare the virus away because evidently, the virus is only active after 10 pm.

Of course, it’s challenging times for everyone, especially with not being able to see each other as often because of the coronavirus. However, evidently, we have a Government that knows what they’re doing.

And apparently, we should trust Boris Johnson and now Boris Johnson believes that the virus doesn’t get busy until after 10 pm, which is evidently a good thing because then we can do what we want up until 10 pm.

But evidently, there mustn’t be more than six of you, because of course, everyone knows that it’s the seventh one, that’s the fishy one.

And now the Government knows that the virus is so clever it knows whether you’re in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland or Wales and that’s why we’ve all got different rules because that’s how intelligent it is.

Does She Need Help?

Carrie Symonds has sparked a debate on social media after she was spotted wearing baby Wilfred in a forward-facing baby carrier while out for a walk in Italy.

Boris Johnson’s fiancee, 32, was seen with her five-month-old son in Lake Como, where she’s staying at the £600 a night Grand Hotel Tremezzo on a girls holiday.

Carrie, who was casually attired in a Ganni frock and Superga trainers, carried five-month-old Wilfred in the £119.90 Ergobaby 360 All Positions Baby Carrier.

The carrier is intended for use with newborns aged up to four months old and features an ergonomic design meaning baby can be carried forwards or opposed to facing inwards.

However, several people took to Twitter to call out the Prime Minister’s partner for wearing it incorrectly, with some expressing concern for the little one’s well being and several people noted that he was uncomfortable and on one side.

One person tweeted: ‘For the love of God will someone teach @carriesymonds how to use a baby carrier properly. That poor kid is constantly been dangled by his crotch with his head all over the place’.

Another wrote: ‘Dear @carriesymonds please will you google safe babywearing? He should be facing you and much higher up, close enough to kiss.’

And one remarked: ‘Outrageous behaviour. Made worse by a photo showing Wilfred’s head dangling off to the side without support. @carriesymonds needs some parenting instructions.’

According to the Ergobaby website, the ergonomic 360 All Positions carrier offers every carry position with a forward-facing option.

The carrier comes with a lumbar support waistbelt for extra lower back comfort and adjustable padded shoulder straps for neck and shoulder comfort and Emily Williamson, a professional carrying consultant and founder of South London Slings, told a news outlet that there are tons of carriers which offer the option of carrying your baby facing outwards.

The bottom line is that your baby needs to be able to completely support their head independently so that it stays steady as you walk.

Babies tend to have the strength for this anywhere between 3-6 months, before this, they should always be held high on the chest, facing towards the body.

If your baby’s head tilts or drops at all as you walk then they’re not ready to be carried facing outwards and all babies will go more limp when they’re sleeping and if their head drops forward it can make it hard for them to breathe.

So, Carrie Symonds should be ashamed of herself and she’s obviously not that bright and it’s surprising she even remembered that she had a baby, but never mind which way to carrie a baby, who’s paying for the £600 a night hotel – can’t be Boris Johnson because evidently, he’s broke.

But these carriers are dangerous, full stop because if the mother falls over, the first to get injured is the baby and it’s truly incredible and shameful that the Prime Minister’s girlfriend is even in Italy.

He leads the country and the advice to travel to Italy is only essential travel.

If you lead a country and create laws, then you must obey them, but it seems that if you’re Conservative Government then there’s no need to obey the rules and you know what, this baby will want for absolutely nothing, will see no poverty, will not go unfed, unwashed, unkissed, unadored and will receive all that’s needed to have a lovely life.

But for crying out loud put the child in a pram if you can’t carry him correctly.

This image of him with his head lolling all over the place, all one can think of is how painful his little neck will be after and Carrie Symonds seems clueless of this.

Babies heads are quite heavy compared to the strength of their neck muscles to support them and he would be so much better in a pram and she looked like she was carrying a 25 kg bag of spuds.

Mould That Transformed The World

The penicillin mould accidentally grown by the physician and microbiologist Alexander Fleming in London in 1928 has had its genome sequenced for the first time.

Researchers from the United Kingdom used frozen samplings of Sir Fleming’s original strain of the fungus and compared them with their current, industrially used counterparts.

The sample of Sir Alexander Fleming’s strain they grew had been kept on ice in the culture collections at the Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International, Oxfordshire and they discovered that the wild UK strain used a slightly different way to produce penicillin than the strains currently used to manufacture the antibiotic in the US.

The discoveries could offer new ways to improve the widescale production of the drug, which is used to treat a combination of bacterially derived infections.

Sir Alexander Fleming discovered the first known antibiotic when a mould of the genus Penicillium accidentally began growing in a Petri dish in his laboratory at the St Mary’s Hospital Medical School, which is today part of the Imperial College London.

He noticed that in a receptacle, which had been left uncovered near an open window, where it became contaminated by the mould, the Staphylococcus bacteria he had left cultivating during a break to Suffolk had died where the fungus had grown.

In contrast, Staphylococci colonies growing further away from the mould were untouched, an observation that led him to comment ‘That’s funny’.

Sir Alexander Fleming was awarded the 1945 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine for his work on penicillin and antibiotics, along with colleagues Ernst Chain and Howard Florey.

Although Sir Alexander Fleming’s strain of the mould is famously referred to as the actual origin of penicillin, production of the antibiotic in the US quickly changed over to using a different type, one that grew on mouldy cantaloupes.

Furthermore, this naturally derived fungus went on to alter over time, as drug manufacturers artificially selected for strains that delivered higher volumes of penicillin and therefore proved to be more lucrative to use.

In their study, the researchers grew mould from an actual sample of Sir Alexander Fleming’s fungus that had been kept frozen in the culture collections of the Centre of Agriculture and Bioscience International.

Paper author and evolutionary biologist Timothy Barraclough of Imperial College London and the University of Oxford said that they initially set out to use Alexander Fleming’s fungus for some other experiments, but then discovered, to their astonishment, that no one had sequenced the genome of this original Penicillium, despite its documented importance to the field.

Professor Barraclough and associates concentrated in particular on two kinds of genes, those that encode for the enzymes that the fungus uses to produce penicillin, and those that regulate those enzymes, for instance by controlling their manufacture.

The team found that both Sir Alexander Fleming’s UK strain and those used industrially in the US had the same regulatory gene code, but the latter variants of the fungus had more compositions of the regulatory genes, allowing them to make more of the drug.

Furthermore, the researchers found that the genes that code for the penicillin producing enzymes were different between the strains isolated in the UK and the US. This, they said, shows that wild Penicillium developed differently between the two countries, leading to slightly different versions of the enzymes.

As moulds like Penicillium produced antibiotics to enable them to fight off microbes, it’s likely that the UK and US strains differ because they had adjusted to best fight the local bacterial populations that each strain encountered.

Paper author and biologist Ayush Pathak, also of Imperial College London said that their research could help illuminate novel solutions to fighting antibiotic resistance.

Sir Alexander Fleming’s findings have paved the way for further innovations in the world of antibiotics. Of course, someone else might have come across it, but it was he who realised that what he saw had a significance, therefore it’s only right that he takes the credit.

Others have taken the research further, that’s only natural, that’s called progress, and in the case of penicillin, thank heaven for that because it’s been proven to be so valuable and he’s literally saved hundreds of millions of lives.

Forensic Psychologist Who Had Phone Conversations With Serial Killer Dennis Nilsen

A forensic psychologist who worked with serial killer Dennis Nilsen claimed that he was a necrophiliac because of deviant sexual behaviour in childhood.

Dennis Nilson, known as the Muswell Hill Murderer, died at the age of 74 at HMP Full Sutton in 2018, 43 years into his life sentence for carrying out a bloodthirsty spree in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

He was one of the nation’s most notorious murderers and Dennis Nilsen is thought to have killed in Cricklewood and Muswell Hill, north London.

Kerry Daynes, from Brighton, who came into contact with the killer in 2008 after he’d spotted her on a crime documentary and got in contact, disregarded the murderer’s earlier claims that he killed because he was lonely, suggesting instead that he was attracted to dead bodies.

She explained that after an odd sexual development as a child, he wanted to create passive partners who he could wash, pose and talk to and who wouldn’t ask questions and she said that to understand Dennis Nilsen you really have to look at a sequence of events during his childhood and his extremely deviant sexual behaviour.

And she said that she didn’t believe he killed because he was lonely and that he only killed because he was necrophilic and he was attracted to dead bodies and she continued that also being around them and being around death made him feel powerful and created passive partners he could pose, wash and talk to. Just like his dog, who never asked questions and made him feel like he was in control.

Dennis Nilsen called Kerry so that he could give his version of events after seeing her on TV and remained in touch until 2012, but he told her that the act of killing was not essential to him and that his killing spree was a consequence of events in his childhood.

She said that he told her the killing wasn’t important to him and that in fact, he found it extremely difficult and that what was important to him was the ultimate product, these men were dead.

He said that when he was at school, he was bullied because he was feminine and people didn’t accept he was gay, which he felt he couldn’t conceal, and he remembered a happening in his childhood, where he had seen one of the boys who’d bullied him being pulled out of the sea and he felt supreme and mighty after seeing his peer so helpless.

He found it extremely sexually stimulating but also realised that boy would never bully him again and that that boy really had no control, which made him feel supreme, powerful and confident.

It was from that point that he would fantasise about dead bodies who had been drowned or dragged from the sea.

He was referred to as the ‘kindly killer’, but there was nothing kind about the way he killed men, but then he would put them in the bath and wash them like he was trying to recreate the scenario of drowning.

Kerry Daynes was joined on a show by Steve McCusker, who was the Detective Inspector on the Nilsen investigation and agreed that his murders were pre-meditated, and the result of a killer who was pure evil.

When asked why the killer was able to go unnoticed for so long, he said it was probably because the people he approached were young vulnerable men and that a lot of the people they investigated and identified had left home under tragic circumstances and they were people normally, if they disappeared off the face of the earth, nobody would ask any questions.

It really does just make you wonder what really goes on in their minds, where they seem to have no regard for human life.

Dennis Nilsen has to be the most macabre yet intriguing of them all. After all, how could anyone have the stomach to sit with decaying corpses all around them? And to also act like everything is normal and it intrigues me how evil the human mind can be.

In The Week Boris Told A Battered Britain It Was In For Another Six Months Of COVID Winter Misery

A news outlet has revealed that Carrie Symonds has enjoyed a five-star holiday in the exclusive Italian resort of Lake Como with her infant Wilfred. However, in the week Boris Johnson told Britons the UK was in for another six months of misery, yet his fiancee has been staying at the £600 a night Grand Hotel Tremezzo in northern Italy with three girlfriends.

During her extravagant getaway, the new mother was seen cutting a casual figure in a £325 blue checked cotton gingham dress by Ganni and black Superga trainers as she strolled along the waterside esplanade with a friend while carrying four-month-old Wilfred in a baby sling.

Her blonde hair was drawn back in a bun at the top of her head, revealing brunette roots and Carrie Symonds, 32, has been spending a few days staying at the elegant lakeside hotel, which is a favourite with the super-wealthy where a two day stay in a suite can cost more than £6,400.

A British holidaymaker told a news outlet that Carrie Symonds appeared extremely relaxed and that she was smiling and laughing with her friends and it was if she didn’t have a care in the world.

Carrie Symond’s restful break comes as the Government made a harsh assessment of the nation’s job opportunities and economic circumstances.

Chancellor Rishi Sunak will today unveil a string of measures aimed at tackling the economic situation with an estimated five million people still reliant on the furlough scheme.

But despite all of this, Boris Johnson’s fiancee didn’t appear to have any worries as she enjoyed her holiday at the hotel which is deemed one of the finest in Europe, popular with rich Americans.

And whilst the Prime Minister was preaching to the nation on Tuesday night to spell out harsh new constraints which will close pubs and restaurants at 10 pm, his fiancee was enjoying a late-night supper with her three companions.

She stayed up until well after 10 pm as she dined at the hotel restaurant where Mediterranean style sea bass with tomatoes, capers and Taggia olives costs £28.

Carrie and her companions were seated on the terrace at an outdoor table. The tables were spaced apart in line with appropriate social distancing and the waiters and all hotel entourage were wearing masks.

The guests are also required to wear masks in the public spaces of the hotel and can only remove them when eating and drinking.

Before dinner the Prime Minister’s partner ambled along the promenade where she was able to take off her mask outside, taking in the scenery with Wilfred attired in a red and white baby grow.

Boris Johnson’s son, with his distinctive shock of blonde hair like his father, took a lively interest in the view before napping in his sling and an onlooker said that it’s such a lovely hotel and they said that they weren’t surprised that Carrie Symonds was having a good time.

This comes as Boris Johnson said he was struggling with money and wanted a wage rise, now I wonder why? And there was us actually thinking that Boris Johnson was pauperised, obviously not splashing out on £600 a night hotels.

And it seems lockdowns are only for ordinary folk while the privileged ones continue to go on lavish holidays.

This week, we had the delight of Boris Johnson gracing our screens once again, addressing the country, where he unveiled a new set of incomprehensible rules.

As if people haven’t been through enough as it is, along with hard-working business owners fortunate enough to have survived this far, have now been told that if they don’t cooperate with the new COVID secure measures, they will be breaking the law.

Yet these laws will do nothing but impede economic recovery and have once again been passed without any form of parliamentary debate and even the Conservative MPs have been irked by the nature of the latest lockdown measures and have publicly voiced their concerns and our bungling ministers are introducing and enacting legislation left, right and centre, with no real scrutiny over the impact they might have.

Hunter Biden Sent Thousands Of Dollars To Women With Ties To Eastern European Prostitution And Sex Trafficking Rings

According to a report unleashed by Senate Republicans, Hunter Biden allegedly sent thousands of dollars to people who may have been involved in Eastern European prostitution and sex trafficking rings.

The report mentioned unspecified records which indicate that Hunter Biden has sent funds to non-resident alien women in the United States who are nationals of Russia and Ukraine and who have subsequently wired funds they have obtained from Hunter Biden to people located in Russia and Ukraine.

The 87-page report was released by the Republican-led Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee and the Finance Committee and focuses on Hunter Biden’s business dealings with Ukraine.

The records also cite that some of those dealings are connected to what appears to be Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring and according to a news outlet, the allegations were cited in a footnote to a part of the report that delves into criminal concerns and extortion threats concerning Hunter Biden and other members of the Biden clan.

The report also cites extensive public reporting regarding Hunter Biden’s apparent involvement with prostitution services. However, the report says, records on file with the Committee don’t verbatim corroborate or rebut these particular reports.

However, they do demonstrate that Hunter Biden sent thousands of dollars to people who have either been involved in transactions consistent with possible human trafficking, an association with the adult entertainment industry and possible association with prostitution.

The report furthermore demonstrated that Hunter Biden had a monetary relationship with the widow of a Moscow mayor who was expelled over corruption allegations. However, the report didn’t incriminate Joe Biden in any misconduct and simply concentrated instead on his son Hunter Biden, who it said had cashed in on his father’s position by joining the board of a Ukrainian gas company.

It also notes that on Valentine’s Day in 2014, Hunter Biden’s company Rosemont Seneca Thorton received a $3.5 million wire from Elena Baturina, a Russian billionaire and the widow of former Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov.

In 2010, Russia’s president sacked Yuri Luzhkov as mayor over corruption allegations, which were never established in court previous to his demise last year.

Elena Baturina, who is worth an estimated wealth of $1.2 billion, is the wealthiest woman in Russia – much of her wealth was built with construction firm Inteco, which dominated the construction business in Moscow, thanks in part to lucrative government deals.

Of course, Hunter Biden is not running for President, so why should people care, but if the report was about one of Donald Trump’s children there would be headlines screaming for days on end.

And it does make you wonder why this wasn’t headlined in the news. That’s probably because it would have made Joe Biden look like a bit of a loser two months before the election.

However, it’s all allegations and possibilities at the moment, there is no concrete proof but the media will attempt to tarnish the Biden family anyhow and Hunter Biden is now the hunted and you can bet your bottom dollar this story isn’t going to go away, but then politics is a messy business.

And they’re so desperate to derail Joe Biden, that the media will toss any sludge out there and hope that something sticks, although this was looked into by the Senate committees, and it was an 87-page report, so maybe there is some substance behind it.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started