Water Is Frantically Lapped At By Rescued Dogs

After her dogs were compelled to live in abhorrent conditions until they were fortunately saved, a lady was hauled before the courts.

In a heartbreaking video released by South Yorkshire Police, the poor animals can be seen frantically lapping at water from a tap in a filthy bathroom.  

Shelby Russell, 29 from Sheffield, has been banned from owning pets for 10 years after she left her cats and dogs to starve to death.

The RSPCA found Russell’s dogs living in filthy circumstances with their own excrement all around them. Additionally, Russell had neglected them for more than a week, causing them to become malnourished and dehydrated.

On October 14 of last year, an RSPCA inspector visited the house and saw the animals by themselves.

They placed seals on Russell’s door to see if anyone gained access to the property before the inspector returned two days later.

The inspector summoned South Yorkshire Police to assist in rescuing the creatures because no one had entered the premises.

Russell made a number of justifications for why her dogs had been left in such a state when she returned to the house before the police arrived.

The excuses included that she had ‘been in hospital’, ‘had paid a dog sitter who failed to care for the animals’, ‘left the tap running 24/7 for the animals’ and ‘fed them three times a day’.

As the RSPCA began to catch and seize the animals, Russell became aggressive and threatening, pushing an inspector and stating she ‘would stab anyone who tries to take her babies’.

She was detained and placed under arrest when police arrived at the property.

The court heard how footage and photographs obtained for evidence showed the dogs scrambling to get to water once it was given and that they continued to drink continuously for minutes.

After the animals were seized, a veterinarian provided a professional assessment of the animal’s condition and the reasons they were so underweight.

No findings indicated that the animals’ health problems prevented them from eating, and their ailments had improved following their seizure.

Dog Legislation Sergeant Matt Duffy said, ‘Animals deserve to be cared for and loved.

‘Leaving them defenceless, locked in cages to starve and dehydrate is disgusting behaviour.

‘I am pleased today that Russell has been banned from owning any animals for 10 years for the pain and suffering she inflicted on these poor animals.

‘We will not tolerate animal cruelty within South Yorkshire and will work with our partners to ensure those responsible are put before the courts.

‘Thankfully this investigation had a happy ending, and the animals were making good progress with their care within the RSPCA.

‘If you have concerns about an animal in your community, report it.’

Russell appeared before Sheffield Magistrates’ Court and was sentenced to a 10-year ban from owning animals, ordered to undertake 20 days of rehabilitation and pay fines totalling £199.

When will courts utilise the Welfare Act to properly punish these individuals? She should have received a life ban and a non-custodial sentence.

The legislation on animal cruelty is insufficient, and those who mistreat animals should have their permission to own an animal withdrawn as soon as they are found guilty.

However, the RSPCA believed that the dogs were abandoned. You could clearly see that they had been, but they sealed the doors and still waited two more days and put these dogs through misery.

She should have been given a prison sentence, but all the prisons are full to the brim at the moment, so there is no room at the inn. However, this woman is a cruel excuse for a human being and she should have had a lifetime ban because she is an awful person with no regard for anything that breathes. I sincerely hope this woman doesn’t have any children of her own.

Iowa Resident Dies From Ebola-Like Virus

A terrifying viral illness that causes ocular haemorrhage, akin to Ebola, has claimed the life of an Iowa person.

According to health officials, the patient brought Lassa fever, an uncommon illness in the United States, back to the country from West Africa earlier this month.

The person was not sick while travelling, meaning the risk to fellow airline passengers is ‘extremely low,’ officials with the U.S. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention said.

Patients are not thought to be contagious before symptoms appear, and casual contact does not spread the virus.

The University of Iowa Health Care Medical Centre in Iowa City isolated the patient, who has not been publicly identified.

Testing conducted by the Nebraska Laboratory Response Network on Monday showed that Lassa fever was the cause of the patient’s death.

The Iowa case, if verified, would be the ninth recorded instance of Lassa fever in visitors returning to the United States from regions where the illness has been prevalent since 1969.

The CDC is now assisting Iowa health officials to identify people who had been in contact with the patient after symptoms began. Those identified as being in close contact will be monitored for three weeks.

Lassa fever, which is caused by the Lassa virus, is a relatively common disease in West Africa, with between 100,000 and 300,000 cases diagnosed every year with around 5,000 deaths.

Symptoms are typically mild and include fever, fatigue, and headache, but some people may develop vomiting, difficulty breathing, facial swelling, and pain in the back, chest, or stomach.

The patient’s infection source is being investigated by state and local health officials.

It’s believed they had been in contact with rodents in West Africa. 

Rodents carry the virus, which people can get by coming into contact with the urine or faeces of infected animals.

In rare cases, it can be transmitted among people through direct contact with a sick person’s blood or bodily fluids, through mucous membranes, or through sexual contact.

Lassa fever was named after a Nigerian town where Western-trained doctors first noted it in 1969. 

Scientists first identified the virus causing Lassa fever in 1969. It belongs to the Arenaviridae family.

According to the World Health Organisation, 80 per cent of people who get infected won’t develop any symptoms. But the virus has a case fatality rate of around 1 percent.

According to the WHO, Lassa fever is endemic in Nigeria and several other west coast African nations, such as Guinea and Liberia.

Someone travelled from West Africa to the United States and brought it in. How wonderful, not! Nor did they specify who brought it in, but clearly they were unchecked for any diseases before they came in, and it’s very scary that American citizens are forced to be exposed to dozens of new diseases because of uncontrolled, unchecked open border policies.

It seems that not one person is cleared, checked, or vetted.

Thanks to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, the United States will now endure years of illness and misery as a result of new migrants and those who are already in the country flying back and forth to their home countries.

“Baaa blind sheep, have you any wool? Yes, sir, yes sir and I’m 6 jabs full. One for humanity, one for that day and four because I’ll always do whatever they say.”

Unfortunately, checking someone who doesn’t exhibit any symptoms is rather challenging. Lassa fever takes one to three weeks to incubate, and its initial symptoms—such as fever, headaches, muscular soreness, and an overall feeling of unwellness—often mimic those of the flu.

Roughly 80 percent of cases are mild and go unrecognised, but the disease can be severe and even fatal in about 1 percent of those infected.

Russian ‘Floating Bomb’ Ship

A Russian cargo ship dubbed the ‘floating bomb’ is due to dock up at a UK port after reportedly being refused entry by other countries.

Peel Ports Group told shipping magazine GCaptain that the ship, known as the Ruby, will arrive at the port of Great Yarmouth in Norfolk on October 28. It is carrying seven times as many explosives as the one that destroyed Beirut in 2020.

Marine Traffic, a worldwide ship tracking service, reports that the Ruby was anchored off Margate, Kent, earlier this month. However, the ship has now relocated to Norfolk, farther north.

After having to leave the Norwegian port of Tromso on September 4 owing to cargo issues, only three days after docking there to take refuge from a storm, it was first sighted around Kent at the end of September.

Before sailing to Las Palmas in the Canary Islands, the cargo ship flying the flag of Malta was loaded with explosives from a port in Kandalaksha, northern Russia, on August 22.

It is understood that the Ruby is loaded with 20,000 tonnes of ammonium nitrate, which is seven times more than the 2,750 tonnes that exploded in the Port of Beirut in Lebanon, killing 218 people in 2020.

However, after meeting with Shipping Minister Mike Kane earlier this month, Sir Roger Gale, MP for Herne Bay and Sandwich, declared that the shipment was secure.

‘I am advised that the cargo, originally destined for Africa, of class 2 ammonium nitrate is safe,’ he wrote on X.

‘Due to damage to the ship, which has not rendered the vessel unseaworthy but requires repair [and] negotiations are ongoing to unload the cargo.’

He also added: ‘[I] am led to believe that the legal situation is that because the ship itself is neither Russian owned nor flagged, no international law has been broken or sanctions breached.’ 

The Ruby’s rudder, hull, and propeller were damaged, but after a few days, officials demanded the ship go as villagers’ concerns increased, according to Newsweek.

The ship was anchored close to hundreds of residences, a hospital, and a university campus, which alarmed the locals.

According to Newsweek, authorities did not outright say the ship would erupt; however, they did say it was ‘not desirable’ for the vessel to be so close to the Norwegian city.

Marine Traffic claims that the Ruby departed Norway and headed northward, passing close to the municipality of Andoy.

The decision was made to pump 37.5 million kroner into the Andoya Air Station, which was constructed in 1951, following a NATO meeting. 

The funds were intended for the defence of the air base, which would eventually be used to monitor the oceans with long-range drones.

In May, the Norwegian Defence Minister Bjorn Arild Gram said: ‘Andoya plays an important role in national security, allied defence and technological development.

‘The growing military-strategic significance of the base for Norway and NATO requires that we continue manned guarding.’

The UK door seems to be open to everyone and everything at all times, and to be honest I don’t trust any official who tells us we are safe, and whoever sanctioned this will have to face the consequences if anything goes wrong, and why does the UK have to be a dumping ground for other countries?

Money my friend – money!

Could this be Prince William’s olive branch to Harry?

Prince William has taken a conciliatory step in his feud with Prince Harry by publicly naming him for what is believed to be the first time in six years.

In a recent documentary, William describes how, as youngsters, Princess Diana brought the boys to a homeless shelter in London to expose them to the reality of life outside the palace.

The film, titled ‘Prince William: We Can End Homelessness’, includes poignant unseen photos of William and Diana at the Passage in Westminster.

One shows the young Prince intently playing chess with a homeless guy at the shelter during Princess Diana’s visit with William on June 14, 1993, a few days before his eleventh birthday.

Another, taken in December that year shows a suited-and-booted young William standing alongside his mother at the shelter, his arms stuffed with presents to give.

‘My mother took me to the Passage; she took Harry and I both there… I’d never been to anything like that before and I was a bit anxious as to what to expect,’ explains William.

‘My mother went about her usual part of making everyone feel relaxed and having a joke with everyone…I remember having some good conversations, playing chess, and chatting.

‘You meet people, like I did then, who put a different perspective in your head.’

The touching introduction demonstrates how the Prince’s recollections of his mother fuelled his desire to eradicate homelessness.

The Prince of Wales is tragically familiar with trauma and family dissolution, which are highlighted in the movie as typical reasons for homelessness.

In addition to his mother’s passing, William and his younger brother are still at odds, and this should not be the case. They are brothers, whether royal or not! It shouldn’t matter what background you come from; blood is thicker than water!

Until this film, it was understood William had not uttered his brother’s name in a public speech or interview since 2018 when the two princes, alongside the Princess of Wales and Meghan Markle, were interviewed at the Royal Foundation Forum.

If only through an old photograph of the two boys visiting the shelter in 1993, the documentary also brings the brothers back together on film.

His wife, the Princess of Wales, was diagnosed with cancer, which was another personal catastrophe that occurred during the filming.

It’s more of a tribute to their mother’s work and his desire to carry on her legacy than an olive branch, although it would be good if it was a positive step. They are brothers, after all.

Reintroducing them both into each other’s lives would be wonderful. They should shake hands and put the past behind them as brothers, even if Harry might never be trusted again. At the end of the day, family is family regardless of what they have done.

Diana would not have wanted this and Prince William knows this. Even if they had a shallow, polite relationship, it would be something, and Diana would have been so disappointed in them both.

Normal individuals don’t permanently cut out their siblings from their lives because they disagree, and as Christians, they should just forgive those who have harmed them. In this case, it was Harry, but I’m sure he had his reasons, and I’m also definitely sure he knows more about his mother’s death than he’s letting on.

Some might say that it wasn’t a disagreement and that it was a complete betrayal. Either way, it has nothing to do with us. It is a family matter that we the public have no jurisdiction in, unless, of course, your surname is Windsor and you are related to them, and even then, they are brothers who should be working it out between themselves, and even their wives should mind their beeswax!

Wi-Fi and Bathrooms Are The Only Reasons Gen Z Soldiers Will Join The Army

Your Army needs you! Unless you’re Gen Z, you need better Wi-Fi and bathroom ensuites.

According to research on Armed Forces accommodation, these were some of the top demands of young soldiers. The top four requirements for Gen Z troops, who are described as those under 27, also included having a double bed and a suitable kitchen in which to prepare their meals.

According to a Ministry of Defence poll, young, unmarried service personnel currently anticipate receiving 19 benefits while in the military. In more recent barracks, troops often have their own rooms, and the most advanced have private bathrooms.

However, many troops on older sites share restrooms, showers, and common areas; in fact, up to six soldiers may share a single space.

According to the survey, inadequate accommodation and the poor quality of food offered in canteens are the main reasons why thousands of soldiers leave the Armed Forces each year.

Up to 40% of soldiers stated that their choice to choose other jobs was largely influenced by worries about housing and food. According to the poll, more than 6,000 of the 15,710 soldiers who left the Armed Forces last year complained about their meals and accommodations.

It also showed that a third of all soldiers believe they pay too much for their accommodation, with more than 20,000 military personnel making formal complaints about accommodation in the last two years, according to MoD figures. 

According to a different assessment released earlier this year, service housing was beset by recurring issues such as mildew, dampness, electrical and gas malfunctions, and insect infestations.

Colonel Phil Ingram, a former Army intelligence officer, said: ‘Too many facilities are shared, where heating often doesn’t work and where roofs leak. There are often problems with vermin and, worst of all, there is little privacy.

‘I am not surprised so many cite accommodation as a reason for leaving, as on the whole, it is generally atrocious.’ 

An MoD spokesman said it is ‘determined to tackle the dire state of service accommodation’ and will appoint an Armed Forces Commissioner ‘to act as a strong, independent champion for personnel and their families to improve service life’.

Cooks on the base used to prepare and serve the food, and it was delicious. However, since it was outsourced to civilian caterers, the quality of the cuisine has declined. Why? Because the goal of civilian caterers’ businesses is profit, not providing the greatest service.

Schools and NHS staff canteens are no different. Instead of having in-house chefs prepare far superior cuisine, they hire catering services to deliver unappetising, subpar food that is then reheated.

Why shouldn’t our forces get decent accommodation and good food? Not only that, but they should get it for free because they’re fighting for their King and country. Let’s face it, if you’re an asylum seeker, our government hands out food and accommodation, but they treat their forces like they’re lepers, disgusting!

Barracks should be neat, orderly, and mould-free, but they can’t expect fine food or bubble baths when they’re on the field and fighting.

We need to provide our troops with far better facilities than they have now.

Nursery Ordered To Remove Privacy Fence

After a ‘ridiculous’ council ordered a nursery to demolish a 6-foot fence that was put in place to protect kids while they were playing outside, parents expressed their outrage.

Westcliff-on-Sea’s Imperial Day Nursery has filed an appeal against Southend Council after the council ordered that a massive fence that rises above the business be removed or its height reduced.

Situated on a residential road in the seaside suburb, neighbours say the fencing, which is 6 feet high, looks ‘terrible and unsightly’.

But parents of children attending the nursery accuse the council of prioritising the ‘aesthetics of the street’ over the safety of their children as they campaign for the fence to stay up.

The nursery first became engulfed in a planning row with the council in 2022 after a complaint was made regarding the structure, which was built without proper planning permissions in place.

Imperial Day Nursery then lodged a retrospective planning application, but the council rejected it, claiming it was ‘visually prominent and stark’ and ‘out of keeping’ with the surrounding area.

The nursery has since intensified its defence by contesting the enforcement action taken by the council.

Speaking to MailOnline outside the nursery, parents told of how they feel safer with the structure being in place.

They say that before its use, strangers could easily peer into the ‘baby room’ at the front of the building, and that the fence also allows children to safely play in the outdoor area in front of the property.

One mother, Natalie Toby, said, ‘I’m a security advisor so from my point of view, it keeps children hidden away from the public walking past.

‘You can’t really see where the front door is unless you go all the way down there, so they’re keeping access routes nice and tucked away.

‘The nursery has been here for 30 years so I don’t see why the council are applying the same rules that they would to domestic dwellings.

‘New-build schools are being built with fence lines not dissimilar to this, so why are they not allowing this?

‘Surely the safety of the children is more important than the aesthetics.’

She told of an incident before the fencing that blocks the window of the front room was erected when a postman unintendedly dropped heavy parcels through the window of the baby room.

She added, ‘So it’s not just about keeping it closed off from people with malicious intentions; it’s accidental things as well.

‘They’ve got vulnerable children in that front room, and having the fence up keeps the babies safe.

‘It’s ridiculous; I don’t understand why the council are being so stubborn about it.

‘Surely safeguarding children and their safety is paramount to aesthetics.

‘I don’t want my daughter in a room where people can just walk past and look through.’

This is a story with two sides. Residents believe the fence is an eyesore and may be depreciating their property, while parents believe it keeps their kids safe.

If Southend council want the fence down, why don’t they find the group a suitable centre where they could be safe and in no one else’s eyesight?

However, all of this makes me feel negatively about the world we live in. What comes next? Will we all be forced to live in bunkers?

Although it’s pleasant to see kids play, not everyone is watching with good intentions, and I would want every safety measure in place if it were my grandkids. However, saying that it’s not normal to keep children away from everyone’s sight. It’s not mentally healthy to have such a fear-driven mindset, and it’s not healthy for kids either.

Mega-mansion On Thames Worth £8 Million

James Corden bought a mansion for £8 million and just abandoned it!

More money than sense! It could be because how this man achieved fame and fortune is even more bizarre than the property itself.

Gavin and Stacey were famous, to be sure, but James Corden has turned into a jerk.

Gavin and Stacy were unquestionably bloody fantastic. However, James Corden comes across as annoying and self-centred, which is why I didn’t like him back then and I don’t like him today.

Do I have anything positive to say about him? Absolutely not!

Both Ruth Jones and James Corden wrote the scripts for Gavin and Stacey. It was funny and good back in the day, but I’d like to see him singlehandedly produce anything near that standard now, and the nasty side of him has been shown too often for him to ever be popular again.

I wish I could spend £8 million on a mansion but the difference is I wouldn’t let it rot away. It’s a very weird-looking home, but also very unique, and if someone wants to spend some money and time on it so they can give it a bit of tender loving care, this mansion would just look amazing.

Suddenly James Corden is back in the UK after living in America for many years and now he decides he wants to do something with it, like knock it down. Don’t knock it down; renovate it; you have the money; you might not have the skill set like in Gavin and Stacey; we’d probably find him in one of the many bathrooms asleep!

Mind you, the mansion is round and expensive just like him, with mirrors everywhere for his vain narcissism, and it very much looks like he sold his soul. Perhaps he got a Black Friday deal with the devil.

James Corden was just a mediocre man who became a little bit famous but then sold his soul so that he could join the Secret Gentlemen’s Club.

This home matches his personality perfectly, in all areas, size, and personality, and he needs to put some backbone work into it to bring it back to its original architecture.

This home appears to have been abandoned until James Corden purchased it. He hasn’t lived there, I believe. It appears that the property and the possibility of building a new house piqued his curiosity more.

The fact that this is James Corden’s property makes it one of my favourites among abandoned mansions. He purchased it, lived in the US, allowed it to deteriorate even more, and then returned to the UK. Maybe the Americans were tired of him?

If you’re going to purchase a property, at least have the decency to bring it up to code regulations so that it can be lived in by someone who wants to live in it.

Don’t just leave it to rot; that is just selfish because while he was leaving it to rot, somebody else could have bought it for a cheaper price and brought it up to scratch. It could have been made into some kind of hostel for the homeless while James Corden was over there in the US scratching his nuts, and I wasn’t talking about the squirrel kind!

Some might say that the mansion is like an artefact from the Dark Ages, so a bit like James Corden, and let’s face it, what’s one more in the area?

Some might say that the 1960s monstrosity needs to be torn down—and so does the house!

NHS Blocks Alzheimer’s ‘Wonder’ Drug From TODAY

The NHS will now ban the use of the most successful medication ever developed for Alzheimer’s disease.

It is anticipated that the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency would deem Donanemab safe.

Donanemab has been called a revolutionary treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. It delayed its development by 35 percent, according to research.

However, the Daily Telegraph said yesterday night that the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) will decide it is too costly.

Since health insurance policies are unlikely to pay prices, patients will only be able to acquire either medication from private clinics under Nice’s recommendations, unless they are enrolled in a clinical trial.

Prof Sir John Hardy, a leading neurological researcher at UCL, said he felt the drug was ‘game-changing’ and that Nice was ‘coming down on the wrong side of the argument’. 

Prof Hardy was the first to identify the role of amyloid in Alzheimer’s, which has now led to drugs that work by clearing the protein. 

He told The Times: ‘These drugs can give people an extra two years at home rather than in a nursing home. That is time enjoying their lives, having holidays—this is important stuff.

‘These are finely balanced arguments, but I do think they’ve come down on the wrong side of it.

‘I also think that the benefit of approval would be that it would kick NHS dementia care into shape, which really needs to happen. These drugs will come down the line at some point, and I don’t think the NHS is ready for them.’

About 1 million individuals in the UK have dementia, including one in six adults over 80. The great majority of care is either paid for privately or given by loved ones.

However, Nice excludes these ‘non-medical’ costs of care in its decision-making. 

Forecasters anticipate that the UK spends about £42 billion annually on dementia, and by 2040, that amount might increase to £90 billion.

Lecanemab, the first ground-breaking therapy for the illness, was licenced in August; the decision on donanemab is expected to follow suit.

Lilly, the company that makes lecanemab, anticipates that the treatment will cost $32,000 (£24,600) in the US, which is around 25% more than their first ground-breaking medication.

As opposed to an hour every two weeks, it has the benefit of being a 30-minute monthly intravenous injection, which lowers the NHS’s cost of administration.

Total treatment costs for donanemab in the US, including monitoring and scans, average $78,000 per year (£60,000) per patient.

The medication can be stopped by patients if it effectively removes the amyloid protein that it targets from the brain. However, lecanemab is given indefinitely until the disease reaches a moderate stage. 

Our government can afford to treat illegal aliens, but they can’t afford to treat our own citizens. This is absurd, and our Labour government are going to spend millions on Ozempic for obesity. You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it drink it.

Whether this is a wonder drug or not is probably open to debate, but as far as the cost situation is concerned, if the NHS stopped paying enormous salaries to non-medical staff, then perhaps their money would go further.

Additionally, it appears that Labour does not support the elderly.

The elderly are the focus of Labour’s policies, which they appear to hate. Since the fuel allowance was eliminated, the NHS no longer provides patients with treatments aimed at enhancing their quality of life.

Since this medication is used to treat primarily elderly patients, it has naturally been blocked. Since it’s all a part of the deliberate and continuous culling of the old, anything that extends the life of those over 60 is prohibited.

House Arrest To Relieve Jail Overcrowding

Labour will open the door to wider use of community punishments for criminals—including house arrest—under a new review.

Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said extending technology such as electronic tags would see the creation of a ‘prison outside prison’ for non-dangerous offenders.

The goal of the sentence review is to resolve the jail problem, which has resulted in the early release of thousands of prisoners in the past six weeks to make room in the cells.

Led by former Tory minister David Gauke, the review will look at ‘robust community alternatives to prison.’

Thousands of criminals a year are currently released from jail on a ‘home detention curfew’ which requires them to wear an electronic tag and observe a curfew.

This type of ‘house arrest’ cannot currently be imposed as an initial sentence by a court, but the review may recommend introducing it as a substitute for jail.

Ms Mahmood said, ‘We have an opportunity now to reshape and redesign what punishment outside of a prison looks like.

‘Theoretically, a judge could hand down a sentence of house arrest.

‘I’m interested in what punishment outside of a prison looks like.

‘It still has to be punishment, they still have to have their liberty curtailed, people have to know and believe there are consequences to breaking our laws.’

The review is also likely to recommend an end to short prison sentences.

When he was justice secretary in 2019, Mr Gauke said short jail terms did not prevent reoffending and called for them to be scrapped in favour of tougher community sentences.

Labour is still committed to constructing an additional 14,000 jail places, increasing the total capacity in England and Wales to 105,000.

Ms Mahmood said: ‘This review, along with our prison building program, will ensure we never again have more prisoners than prison spaces.

‘I believe in punishment. I believe in prison, but I also believe that we must increase the range of punishments we use.’

The review will look at introducing ‘minimum sentences’ for serious crimes but it remains unclear how they could work.

Ms Mahmood is also understood to have been impressed by a scheme in Texas that gives well-behaved prisoners time off their jail sentences.

To learn more about the programme, she intends to visit the United States in the next year.

The new review will scrutinise ‘the point at which offenders are released from prison’, opening the way for some inmates to be freed earlier.

Additionally, the length of time they are under community probation officers’ supervision will be examined.

The 34% of people who voted for Labour are not me, and I’m happy that I didn’t vote Labour or Conservative, and before you ask, yes I did vote for a party.

The reasons for voting for a party and not saying which one is because successive governments have failed to do anything constructive, like building enough prisons to cope with the enormous increase in our nation’s population caused by 20 years of open borders, and releasing dangerous criminals into our neighbourhoods is far from the answer, and instead of voting for who we think would be the best choice, vote nobody. Don’t go to the polls like it’s the Olympics. Stay at home, and let our government swing from the chandeliers whilst trying to scratch their heads like a bunch of Orangutans, wondering what the hell is happening.

Five Strikes, You’re Out, Jenrick Says

A new ‘five strikes and you’re out’ policy with automatic jail terms for repeat offenders has been unveiled by Tory leadership contender Robert Jenrick.

According to him, those found guilty of five or more offences will spend at least a year behind bars.

Its goal would be to stop the large number of crimes committed by repeat criminals.

The policy would require tens of thousands of extra prison places, funded partly by selling off inner-city jail sites in London and other cities.

The land would be ‘sold with planning permission for high-rise residential development’, Mr Jenrick said.

Money from the sales would be reinvested in new mega prisons’ located in cheaper areas of the country to hold 1,500 or more inmates.

‘If we have the extra capacity, then we can introduce a ‘five strikes and you’re out’ rule,’ Mr Jenrick said.

‘This will end the farce of career criminals, many with 25 or more prior convictions, committing yet more crimes and not going to jail for it.

‘This will enable us to bring about the much safer society we need. Altogether, this reform would significantly cut crime—by around a third.’

He said selling London’s Wormwood Scrubs, Wandsworth, Brixton, and Pentonville jails could raise £1.6 billion alone.

However, fourteen years of unrestricted immigration have resulted in overcrowding in our country’s jails, traffic jams on our highways, and sewage systems so overloaded that our once-pure rivers are now being forced to receive raw sewage from the water corporations. Our government needs to issue an apology, particularly to those in charge of the massive rise in boat crossings that is still going on.

And now they’re coming over more than ever, and no one in our government is attempting to stop them!

After releasing hundreds of criminals, our government now wants to imprison even more people. Somewhere here’s an irony! But then we must remember that Labour is in power and Jenrick is a Tory, and he can’t unveil such a plan.

Legal and illegal immigrants should be deported as soon as they are found guilty of any crime.

The issue is that there just isn’t enough prison space, the law hasn’t been adequately implemented for decades, and individuals increasingly consider prison to be a vacation destination.

Even some of our homeless try to get themselves banged up for the winter so that they can be warm and have a meal and a bed. That’s how lenient our prisons are.

I have no confidence in this man when all of our prisons are bursting at the seams. What is this man talking about—not enough room at the inn—where is he going to put all these people?

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started