People Over 60 Might Be Charged For Prescriptions Under New Plan

Under the new proposals, people will only be able to get free prescriptions when they’re 66, and people over 60 could soon have to pay for their prescriptions under new proposals from ministers.

Over 60s are currently able to avoid prescription charges in England, with exemption also applying to anyone under 16 or teenagers in higher education.

A newspaper outlet has announced that the Government has begun a consultation on whether to raise the cut off point to 66 years old in line with the state pension age.

However, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) said it was very concerned by the plan and warned it could leave people without the medication they need.

RPS chair in England Thorrun Govind said that the plan to increase the age at which people can obtain free prescriptions from 60 to 66 means that countless more people will be hit by this tax on the sick at precisely the time at which they may be needing more medications.

She said it was unacceptable to increase the cost of prescriptions in the current economic situation when many have been disadvantaged by the pandemic, and that every day pharmacists are asked by patients who are unable to afford all the things on their prescription which ones they could do without.

She continued that patients shouldn’t have to make decisions that involve rationing their medicines and that no one should be faced with a financial barrier to getting the medicines they need.

Ministers are considering a grace period for older people aged between 60 and 65 when the changes come in, enabling them to continue to get free prescriptions.

People currently have to pay £9.35 per prescription item or those who regularly need medicines can purchase a prepaid certificate for £108.10 for 12 months.

Government analysis suggests the move could cost an additional £46.75 a year for the average person without regular needs for medication.

This would rise to an extra £130.90 for people who need more than 12 prescriptions per year.

Ministers believe the move would draw in up to £300 million more for the NHS by 2026-27.

Health Minister James Bethell said that they were committed to improving patient care and helping the NHS with the funding it needs to recover from the pandemic, and he said that the upper age exemption for free prescriptions used to align with the state pension age, but that link has been lost over the years.

Sadly, we have a pretty nefarious, corrupt Government who can find £250,000,000 to have a vanity project “Royal” yacht, give the DUP £500,000,000, a bribe to remain in power and find the funds to renovate that unfit for purpose place called Parliament.

But then we’re the dimwits who continue to fall under the spell of the populist imbecile Boris Johnson and we now need to wake up and smell the coffee. The trouble is, some of us never will because they’re besotted with him, he only has to ruffle his hair and they all love it.

The NHS is supposed to be “Free at the point of use”. And Wales and Scotland are clearly financially better off than England as they don’t have prescription charges.

But this could all be because we’re heading towards privatising the NHS, but countless people rely on life-saving medications, and none of them will be able to afford the medications they need, but even more, could be recovered by taxing the super-rich and other tax evaders.

And if COVID didn’t get you, the Tories will, and as Scrooge said: “Decrease the surplus population”, and that’s precisely what our Government want by charging older people for prescriptions, and they have no shame, they’re definitely living up to their name of the Nasty Party.

Reunited For Their Mother

Prince Harry and Prince William set aside their disagreements to unveil a statue as a permanent memorial to their dear mother on what would have been her 60th birthday.

The brothers were pictured standing shoulder to shoulder before unveiling a statue erected in Princess Diana’s honour by Ian Rank-Broadley and located in the reconstructed Sunken Garden of Kensington Palace, a site of solace and refuge for her before she died in 1997.

They put their animosity to one side at the private ceremony, which began at 2 pm, and saw Diana’s sons gather along with the princess’ siblings, Earl Spencer, The Lady Sarah McCorquodale and The Lady Jane Fellows, in addition to the Statue Committee, the sculptor Ian Rank-Broadley, garden designer Pip Morrison and Chair of Historic Royal Palaces, Rupert Gavin.

Hundreds of mourners assembled outside from dawn with Diana’s followers travelling from all over the United Kingdom to west London for the emotional commemorative event, with Harry appearing at 1.45 pm, only 15 minutes before the grand unveiling.

The brothers, who’ve been split by Harry’s decision to leave the United Kingdom, were observed conversing on the grounds of Kensington Palace minutes before the grand unveiling, but what had originally been planned as a grand celebration to mark her life has now been classed as a private event, mainly due to bad blood between the brothers and Harry’s determination to control media coverage.

The brothers are said to have hardly spoken and have an especially strained relationship after two years of rows over Harry’s wife and her alleged treatment of staff and the couple’s decision to emigrate to America and the tonnes of truth bombs the Sussexes have dropped in TV interviews watched by tens of millions of people throughout the globe.

Harry and Meghan believe they were abandoned by the Royal Family, even accusing them of racism towards Archie and disregarding their cries for help when the Duchess of Sussex felt alone and suicidal while pregnant in London.

But as if beating Germany wasn’t astounding enough, the England football team seems to have achieved the near unbelievable. For it appears the remarkable 2-0 victory helped bring about a thaw to the icy relations between Princes William and Harry, sparking a flurry of messages between them after the match.

Sources close to their uncle Earl Spencer, who was at the statue unveiling, said that there’s hope that the celebration of their mother’s life and legacy would bring them together again. Prince Charles and the Queen, who were in Scotland, did not attend the Spencer dominated event.

Diana would have been extremely disappointed in both her sons, but then if Diana had still been alive, I don’t suppose this would have all happened and I don’t believe that Harry and Meghan would have gone to the US because Diana was a truly compassionate woman and would have made Meghan feel extremely welcome, and probably would have instructed Meghan in ways that the Royal Family couldn’t do because they have no feeling.

Diana did her own interview and leaked information secretly, there was even a book.

She hated Royal life and she felt unsupported like her son, and she felt stifled, unable to live as she wanted, but she also hated the media, and perhaps she would have been proud of Harry for walking away, for speaking out, and for living the life that he wanted.

And like she said so many times, she’d been quelled and also felt trapped, and everyone’s so conveniently forgotten how she was also seen as a loose cannon, so let’s be real here, she would have been the most supportive of Harry being free, then William having to live the way that he does, and we all know the truth of the matter when it comes to Diana and how she would have seen this.

No Self-Isolation For Double-Jabbed, No COVID Passports And No School Bubbles

Chris Whitty has backed Freedom Day going ahead on July 19 as he told the Cabinet it should strive to get as much open this summer as possible before winter.

The Chief Medical Officer reportedly indicated his support for lifting the remaining coronavirus restraints next month as he prepared Cabinet ministers on Monday.

Chris Whitty said the winter period was likely to be much more complex, but sources alleged he’d been cautiously optimistic.

The scientist’s backing for easing restrictions represents a huge boost to Boris Johnson ahead of the final stage in his lockdown exit roadmap and comes after ministers had struck a significantly more bullish tone in recent days on reopening.

Senior Government figures have accentuated that the country must now learn to live with coronavirus amid growing hopes of a return to something close to normal.

These hopes have further increased after it was revealed that ministers were set to shelve plans for the compulsory use of COVID certification after July 19.

In the meantime, it’s been claimed that fully vaccinated Brits will no longer have to self isolate for 10 days after contact with a positive COVID case, with the quarantine requirement replaced with daily testing.

And in a third piece of good news, school bubbles are to be scrapped in a bid to prevent a surge in COVID related pupil absences.

However, the change isn’t expected to come into force until the commencement of the next school year in September.

According to a newspaper outlet, Chris Whitty told a Cabinet briefing at the start of the week that the Government is on track to push ahead with lifting the remaining coronavirus restrictions on July 19.

Coronavirus case numbers continue to grow, but there’s not been a similar leap in hospitalisations, prompting increasing confidence that vaccinations have broken the link between infections and serious illness, paving the way for life to get back to normal.

A Cabinet source told the newspaper that the view amongst the scientists was that we should get as much open this summer as possible before winter, which will be much more complex – it was reassuring.

Another source said that the Chief Medical Officer had been cautiously optimistic.

It comes after several ministers had said the country would have to learn to live with the virus in the coming months and years in a marked change in Government tone.

The Prime Minister’s Official spokesman yesterday likened the strategy to living with the flu which killed 22,000 people in England in 2017-18.

The key phrase is before winter, then they’re going to slap restrictions on the people of Britain until the people of Britain stand up to this oppression.

Maybe they’re getting ready to save Christmas, and of course, they’ll get away with it, and they’ll give people a small taste of freedom before locking down hard again come the winter, it’s all so predictable, and this will only end when enough people say NO!

And surely, now, the government will realise that the lockdown, and keeping people inside their homes, self-distancing and mask-wearing has drastically diminished our natural immunity.

And all that can be said is that if the government renege on removing lockdown on July 19, there will be some serious social trouble coming, but you just know that there will be more of this hogwash coming in the winter. So, the reset continues with only a little break, how considerate of them!

Gas Pumps Run Low On Fuel Ahead Of July 4th Weekend

Gas services across the country were running out of gasoline just as 43 million Americans were planning to hit the road for the July 4th holiday weekend.

Those that do manage to obtain gas are expected to discover some of the highest prices in almost seven years, with gas now averaging $3.10 a gallon across the US, the highest since October 2014.

Demand has skyrocketed since last summer as COVID weary Americans hit the road again, although the prevailing shortages are being caused by a shortage of available truckers to deliver fuel.

According to CNN, it means numerous services will not be able to get gasoline delivered at all.

The prices are also up 42 per cent compared to a year ago when the pandemic sent gas prices plunging following a huge drop off in demand.

Currently, the outages are not concentrated in one place with services running bare in the Pacific Northwest, Northern California, Colorado and Iowa as well as Indianapolis and Columbus, Ohio.

Tom Kloza, global head of energy analysis for the Oil Price Information Service said it used to be an afterthought for station owners to schedule truck deliveries – now it’s job No 1, and he was concerned because July had an increased demand, which worked out to approximately 2,500 to 3,000 more deliveries needed every day, and there were just not enough drivers to do that.

Although a deficit of drivers is a problem throughout the trucking industry, and specific qualifications are required to drive a gas tank and finding new drivers is no easy task, and the pandemic saw several tank drivers retiring with others moving to other trucking jobs after the demand in gasoline dropped so abruptly.

National Tank Truck Carriers estimates 20 per cent to 25 per cent of tank trucks across the country are currently parked up, and Ryan Streblow said to CNN, the executive vice president of the NTTC, that it had certainly grown exponentially.

Although the gasoline demand was comparable to the 2019 pre-pandemic, and that demand was up 16 per cent compared to the end of last year.

AAA is forecasting more than 43 million people to hit the road this Fourth of July weekend with the 2019 record, which saw 41.4 million Americans hit the road, likely to be broken.

There’s a serious deficit of all truck drivers in the US and the United Kingdom, and not every truck driver can drive gas tankers, they need additional qualifications, and it affects everything.

How much fuel do you think that FedEx and UPS use in a week? How many big rigs are moving food around the country every day, or airlines? And big rig trucks transport everything, and gasoline is skyrocketing, and the cost of delivery is climbing, and everything that the trucks carry will go up in price.

This isn’t about equating the increasing price of gas with any governmental party, this is COVID driven and it will take several years to right itself, and things are spread out in the US and they don’t have sufficient public transit everywhere, so Americans must drive a lot more miles than a lot of countries, so need a lot more gas, which gets pretty pricey.

Of course, the situation has been caused because of the COVID pandemic, which has been allowed to spread all over the US, and now they’re just having a meltdown, and I believe it’s going to get a whole lot more expensive, and next will be the lack of consumables.

And inflation due to scarcity is the direct consequence of a post-COVID world, and now there’s not enough stock coming in, with loads of bare shelves in stores, but it’s a great way to keep people from their July 4 celebrations, and is this all about control yet again?

Are We Heading For A Buy-To-Let Exodus?

The number of homes for rent in Britain could fall dramatically, as landlords leave the market thanks to higher taxes and more stringent rules.

About a million landlords, more than a third of the total, will review their property holdings in the next year, according to the Nottingham Building Society, and the amount planning to sell homes outnumbers those planning to purchase new ones.

A fifth plan to sell some or all of their portfolio, it said, while 16 per cent plan to purchase more.

While those homes going to first time buyers or families would benefit more people to climb onto or up the property ladder, it could also lead to a deficit of property to rent, and in some popular parts of the country, a shortage of rental homes has lately led to bidding wars.

Meanwhile, a new report by the University of York and the Nationwide Foundation noticed that a huge group of baby boomer landlords were now ageing out of the market and were not being replaced at the same rate by younger landlords due to diminishing returns and more rigorous regulations.

This, it said, could suggest that there will not be enough rental homes to go around in future, particularly for those renters on lower wages or who receive benefits.

It added that across the whole sector, there was a decline of 30 per cent in the amount of buy to let mortgages between 2014-15 and 2018-19.

Both reports noted that tax changes have been one of the principal factors making buy to let less attractive for some.

Previously landlords got tax relief on mortgage interest, but this stopped in April 2020.

There are also new constraints on private residence relief, which decreases the capital gains tax due on homes which people rent out after living in them.

Dr Julie Rugg, the lead author of the report, said that letting property looks altogether different to landlords now and that it seems like a much more precarious proposition, delivering a lower level of return and with a lot more hassle, and as one landlord said to her, stocks and shares may not deliver the same level of return, but they don’t phone her on a Sunday morning because the boiler’s bust.

Julie Rugg also mentioned the regulatory burden which landlords felt they were confronted with thanks to more stringent Government rules on how they managed their tenancies.

Not everyone can afford to buy a house, and now they will be faced with fewer rentals and the price will go up, and it was obvious this was going to happen, and it’s all very well people moaning about landlords purchasing properties, but changing the taxation rules to make it profitless and was always going to cause many of them to sell up, and the people will suffer won’t be the landlords, they’ll put their money into something else. It’s the lower-paid people who can’t get a mortgage who will end up having to pay inflated rents for the properties that are left.

And everything the government does just makes the problem worse, and even the help to buy has stopped the house prices from falling to affordable levels, and it just puts young people in even more debt.

And many landlords are selling their rental properties and putting the proceeds with corporate landlords who are buying into buy to let properties, and of course, they’re charging higher rents to the tenants, but their return on their investment is as good as buy to rent, so why should they worry?

He’s Had His Play Already!

This is the hilarious moment armed Downing Street police officers mocked cheating Matt Hancock when a member of the public humorously asked whether the former Health Secretary could come out to play.

In the video posted on TikTok, an officer standing guard cheekily tells the chortling heckler that disgraced Matt Hancock was cleaning out his locker before another quipped that he’d had his play already.

Matt Hancock left government and ditched his wife of 15 years last week after a news outlet splashed photographs of his clinch with millionaire aide Gina Coladangelo in his ministerial office.

The clip, taken by company boss Dan Wright on Monday afternoon, has gone viral and has been viewed more than a million times already.

In the video, Dan Wright asks the group of armed policemen: ‘Is Matt allowed to play? Is Matt allowed to come out and play?’ The smirking officer then replies: ‘No, he’s cleaning his locker out at the moment’ – to howls of laughter from his co-workers.

Passerby Dan Wright, of Chelmsford, Essex, also burst out laughing, while a second armed police officer quips: ‘He’s had his play already.’

Social media users applauded the video, with one writing that they loved the British humour. Another said that they found everything about this so hilarious, and what a stinker he’s had.

The Metropolitan Police have been contacted for comment.

It comes amid reports Gina Coladangelo, 43, has left her husband and is determined to make a go of her relationship with the disgraced former Health Secretary.

Gina Coladangelo stepped down from her Health Department director role hours after Matt Hancock himself resigned over images of them in a loving embrace.

Matt Hancock, 42, had also ended his marriage to wife Martha shortly before the revelations were made public and is now understood to be living with his lover.

It’s now been reported by a news outlet that Gina Coladangelo, 43, has split with her husband Oliver Tress after her affair was exposed, and sources have said that the millionaire has been left devastated by the affair and her departure from their 12-year marriage.

She was pictured leaving her £4.5 million southwest London home hours before images of their hallway rendezvous was exposed. Husband Oliver however helped as she packed bags into the back of her £70,000 Audi Q7 – he didn’t leave with her.

Friends now say that Matt Hancock and Gina Coladangelo are in love and want to make a go of their new relationship.

However, this incident isn’t funny and the armed police officers guarding the official residence of the Prime Minister have no business frolicking with the public, and they should not have been spoken to, although I guess it is great to see the police having a joke with the public – it kind of makes them seem more human.

And although this is funny, the police shouldn’t be involved like this because they should remain unbiased and not get distracted, particularly when guarding a sensitive area, although it seems that Matt Hancock has already handled all the sensitive areas.

Matt Hancock might not have been the most effective Health Minister during the pandemic, but he now looks really effective with his tongue down his aide’s throat, breaking the very rules he inflicted on the nation.

And has Matt Hancock traded up because Gina has definitely traded down because Matt has all the personality, appeal, and lovability of a used wet wipe? And I certainly wouldn’t consider anything that involves inflicting great distress on your children a trade up, but hey that’s just me, I guess!

Classified UK Defence Papers Discovered At A Bus Stop In The Southeast Of London

The BBC reported that sensitive defence documents containing details about the British military had been discovered at a bus stop in England.

The BBC said that the papers included proposals for a likely UK military presence in Afghanistan, as well as talks about the possible Russian response to the British warship HMS Defender’s travel through waters off the Crimean shoreline last week.

The broadcaster said a member of the public who wanted to remain unnamed contacted them when they discovered the pile of documents, about 50 pages in all, in a soggy pile on Tuesday behind a bus stop in Kent, southeast of London.

The Ministry of Defence said an employee had reported the loss of the papers last week, but it didn’t provide details about the incident or confirm the documents were discovered at a bus stop.

It said in a statement that the Ministry of Defence was notified last week of an incident in which sensitive defence papers were found by a member of the public and that the department takes the security of information very seriously and that an inquiry has been launched, and that it would be improper to discuss the matter further.

John Healey, the defence spokesperson for the opposition Labour party, said the incident was both disturbing and troubling, and that ministers must be able to verify to the public that national security hasn’t been threatened, that no military or security operations have been affected and that the proper procedures were in position to ensure nothing like this occurs again.

The HMS Defender upset Russia’s military on Wednesday when it navigated south of the Crimean Peninsula in a Black Sea region that Moscow maintains as its territorial waters.

Numerous countries, including the United Kingdom, don’t accept Russia’s 2014 occupation of Crimea from Ukraine and consider that expanse to be Ukrainian waters.

But if these documents were so classified, why were they printed out so that they could be misplaced and why was this person carrying them to take them on the bus? And at what level of official would someone be carrying current and sensitive information on a broad spectrum of topics as HMS Defender and Afghanistan as a hard copy? Something smells fishy to me.

Or was it the Russians, it’s not as if they’ve not extracted classified documents from Whitehall before, but then the Russian’s wouldn’t have handed them to the BBC! And to leave such a large amount of sensitive classified documents in a soggy heap behind a bus stop implies more than just absent-mindedness, although stranger things have happened, you do have to wonder.

But I can only see three imbeciles here. The person that left the documents at the bus stop, the person that found them and gave them to the press instead of back to the MoD, and the BBC for publicising national defence papers, and in 2021, in this digital world that we live in, people shouldn’t be carrying around sensitive documents.

And of course, it’s typical of the BBC to divulge these sensitive documents sooner than to act in the national interest and just return them, and I hope that the messenger knows that in the United Kingdom, the Official Secrets Act is a law, not a contract and that individuals are bound by it whether or not they have signed the act.

So, could this force the government to reform its safety methods to stop further leaks, so that they do their jobs properly, or is it that these details aren’t classified since the papers legal team would have checked with the MoD, meaning that this is a distraction as usual.

Muslim Boy, 11, Who Told His Class He Wanted To Give Alms To The Needy

An 11-year-old Muslim student who told his class that he wanted to give charity to the needy was referred to as controversial anti-terrorism watchdog Prevent after his teacher misunderstood the word’ alms’ for ‘arms’.

A legal challenge lodged by the parents against the school asserts that his teacher had asked the class what they would do if they inherited a substantial amount of money.

The primary school pupil, whose family portrayed him as knowledgeable and widely read, and who is said to be very interested in medieval history, had then responded that he would give alms to the oppressed.

In the past, religious people with financial means would give alms, usually, food, clothing or money to help the needy or less fortunate.

But the teacher is said to have panicked when they mistook the word ‘alms’ for ‘arms’, and referred the child to the anti-terror programme Prevent without getting permission before sharing his data with the unit.

However, police closed the case down after discovering there was no substance to it, no indication of radicalisation or extremism, or any threat to national security.

The parents are now taking legal action against the school and are demanding a written apology, damages and the expunging of the Prevent referral from the boy’s record ahead of him attending grammar school.

The parents also claim that the teacher who referred their son to Prevent breached the Equality Act 2010, alleging they applied stereotype about his racial and religious background.

The solicitor representing the boy’s parents said the case proves how dangerous the Prevent programme can be and asked for the unit to be scrapped.

Attiq Malik, director of Liberty Law Solicitors, told a newspaper outlet that this was yet again another instance of a fail by the Government’s Prevent Programme on vulnerable impressionable children, highlighting why the Programme was possibly dangerous and needs to be discarded as it just doesn’t work.

He said that in the current economic climate, teachers are scarcely equipped properly to carry out their teaching duties, let alone the additional policing responsibilities forced on them by Prevent.

He continued that criminal legalisation and safeguarding policies have always existed to protect the public and defenceless members of our society and that there was no need for a policy that was nothing less than the equivalent of using a sledgehammer to break a nut and thus unnecessary.

It’s astounding how misguided our teachers are these days, but on the other hand, should we be glad that there’s a system to prevent possible indoctrination?. But let’s face it ‘alms’ and ‘arms’ do sound very much alike, and perhaps the teacher should have clarified this simple mistake before running off to report it Prevent before this boy was being wrongly accused of something like that.

On the other hand, perhaps the teacher was too scared of losing their job, due to challenging a child of their Muslim belief, but of course, one more inquisitive question from the teacher would have prevented all of this.

Although to be fair, you can see how the confusion arose. The word ‘alms’ is an old fashioned term, and one that one would not necessarily expect to be used by a child, and you should never make assumptions with children, and a teacher who makes assumptions is a dangerous thing, and 99 per cent of readers wouldn’t know what ‘alms’ meant either, so there’s no surprise the teacher thought he said ‘arms’.

Saj Gets Down To Business

Sajid Javid announced his most pressing priority will be ending the pandemic as quickly as possible and praised cheating Matt Hancock’s record in government after the discredited former minister was pictured ridiculing coronavirus restrictions.

Talking to the media for the first time since becoming Health Secretary, Sajid Javid said that he just wanted to begin by saying that he believed that Matt Hancock worked especially hard, he accomplished a lot, and he was certain he would have more to contribute in public life.

Sajid Javid said that he was honoured to take up the position and that he also knew that it came with tremendous responsibility and he would do everything that he could to make sure that he delivered for the nation.

He said that we are still in a pandemic and he wanted to see that come to an end as quickly as possible, and that will be his most immediate priority, to see that we can return to normal as quickly and as promptly as possible.

The former Chancellor of the Exchequer left government in February 2020 after Boris Johnson tried to sack his whole team and amid reports of a tumultuous relationship with former senior No 10 aide Dominic Cummings, who himself quit in November last year.

Sajid Javid has returned to the Prime Minister’s cabinet as an emergency replacement for Matt Hancock, who resigned as Health Secretary and left his wife, Martha of 15 years after a newspaper outlet splashed photographs of him kissing aide Gina Coladangelo in his ministerial office.

The Prime Minister faced a tsunami of calls to fire Matt Hancock from Labour and anti-lockdown Tories after photos and a video showed the disgraced ex-minister flouting the very restrictions he forced on millions of people throughout the pandemic.

Leading medics are warning Sajid Javid that he faces a baptism of fire in his new position and will need to be honest with the people over tackling a backlog of care and negotiate the resources that the NHS requires as continuous lockdowns push the health service to its limit.

British Medical Association council chairman Dr Chaand Negpaul said that BMA members were feeling exhausted after 15 months of this pandemic and that many have worked flat out without breaks.

Speaking to Sky News, the doctor added there were a recorded five-plus million patients on waiting lists, which didn’t include approximately 20 million patients who were not seen in outpatients clinics last year.

However, choosing Sajid Javid makes no sense at all because he has no understanding of the health system, but now he’s in charge of it.

Boris Johnson could have picked Nadim Zahawi who has been working with the NHS in the vaccine roll out or even Jeremy Hunt who’s had the position before, but Boris Johnson is terrified of upsetting his cabinet, so fell back on someone he previously sacked, which makes this government a sham, and our Prime Minister may as well be walking on stage with his pants falling down!

But then there appear to be several cabinet posts that are being recycled.

Sajid Javid said that the most immediate priority was ending the pandemic as soon as possible – so no one else could have done this, but he can – this speaks volumes about his intellect.

One Health Secretary wasn’t particularly bright and is now gone, and has been replaced with another who embarrassed himself with the first statement, and it might be funny, but I don’t think he could beat Matt Hancock.

Cheating Aide Gina Coladangelo Quits £15,000 Department of Health Board Position

Matt Hancock’s mistress Gina Coladangelo is stepping down from her £15,000 position at the Department of Health after footage of the pair’s romance was brought to light.

The married mother of three Gina Coladangelo, 43, was discovered locking lips with former Health Secretary Matt Hancock, 42, in leaked CCTV footage from May 6.

Matt Hancock had hired her as a health aide in September as a non-executive director at the Department of Health but the couple has both left in disgrace after they were observed caressing each other and breaking social distancing rules they imposed on the British people.

Gina Colandangelo’s departure came just hours after Matt Hancock declared he was stepping down from his position as Health Secretary after tension arose from the public and other MPs for breaking social distancing rules that he helped to create.

The pair’s kissing session was captured on CCTV a year to the day after Matt Hancock went on TV to expose an epidemiologist for having an affair and breaking lockdown rules.

Neil Ferguson, an epidemiologist who helped to shape the government’s response to coronavirus and instigated a lockdown, was caught last year having an affair and breaking social distancing rules he’d helped to create, in a comparable manner to Matt Hancock.

And Matt Hancock told Sky News that he backed the police and that they would make their decisions independently from ministers, and that was quite right, and that it had always been like that, and that he would give them their space to make that decision, and that he took the right decision to quit.

Matt Hancock and Gina Coladangelo became friends at Oxford and have been close ever since.

A close friend of Matt Hancock said that they were in love and that it was serious, but the friend insisted that the affair all started in May, and that might not be so easily believed.

It’s come to light that the former Health Secretary told his wife, Martha, he would be leaving her on Thursday night, shortly after learning that his romance with Gina Coladangelo was about to be laid bare.

According to a news outlet, Martha was oblivious of the affair until the footage was brought to light, and he reportedly even woke up the couple’s youngest child, aged eight, to break the news he was leaving.

And who takes a 15K job unless there are other perks to be had? But of course, we all know what those perks were, and she was married to a multi-millionaire, so she didn’t need the money, so presumably just took the job so she could have her wicked way with Matt Hancock because she felt like it.

Matt Hancock hasn’t just left his wife, he’s left his children as well, but is that worth it for a piece of skirt? And will both Matt Hancock and Gina Coladangelo live to regret this?

All I can imagine is that Gina Coladangelo must be sensational in the sack for Matt Hancock to have jeopardised his marriage and children and to have given up so much. And certainly looks wise and bank balance-wise, Gina seems to have it all, but will she still be interested in Matt Hancock now that he’s lost his powerful position? Although I’m sure Matt Hancock has made his millions, and his salary was just chicken feed.

But I don’t think they thought they would get caught, not for one minute because the elites always believe that they’re above everyone else.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started