Sydney Nurse Is Sacked

A Sydney nurse says she was fired for giving unwanted doses of Pfizer vaccine to her daughter and two nephews instead of ejecting them in the bin.

Grandmother Kirstin Peterson, 67, was working for Healthcare Australia at an aged care facility and had three shots of the Pfizer jab left over at the end of the day.

Each vial contains five doses of the vaccine, but if the remaining doses are left over after it’s been opened, they can’t be kept and must be thrown away, but rather than dispose of the coveted vaccine, she gave them to her family members.

Each family member was eligible to receive Pfizer, she said, but her bosses fired the 40-year veteran nurse on the spot.

She said that it broke her heart to see those doses just being squirted in the bin and that she felt terrible because that could have been used for someone else, but instead, they go in the bin.

The nurse had been working at different aged care and disability homes in the Greater Sydney region and had been careful to minimise wastage, and she said that Pfizer has to be kept in very specific, demanding conditions and expires quickly, but Kirstin Peterson said that she only ever had to dump three doses in total, before the incident with her family.

She said that normally, she didn’t have any to throw out, and that she’d been pretty fortunate, and that on the day her family members came in, none were squirted out, they were used.

She maintained that she wouldn’t have opened a vial of vaccine just to vaccinate her own family.

She said that they were the spares that were going to be discarded anyway, that there was no gain for her, and there was no monetary incentive.

Kirstin Peterson urged her bosses not to fire her but the pleas fell on deaf ears, even though she asked if she could have another chance, but they said no, and she said that it was only her job at the moment, but they said that she’d squandered it.

But she added that she believes that she did the right thing, and that part of the code of conduct was to be clever and cost-effective.

The decision to fire her flies in the face of the official advice from NSW Chief Health Officer Dr Kerry Chant who was questioned about the incident.

The vaccine was going to be thrown out anyhow, so did it matter? At least it went on somebody that needed it. Slap her on the wrist, but don’t fire her, and rather than wasting this vaccine, there should be a call out for all those waiting for the jab to go in and get one, but don’t throw them out.

It’s absurd that this woman has been given the sack, and rather than just tossing them out, they should have put information out on social media to see if anyone wants a jab that day rather than waste them.

But at the end of the day, this woman did take dangerous drugs, and what if those children had an unfavourable reaction and perhaps life-threatening, but she just didn’t want them wasted, and it would have been a waste of a vaccine and the money it costs.

And let’s face it, Governments keep telling us there’s a shortage of the vaccine, so why bin three doses? Especially when the government are seeking to resource as many vaccines as possible.

Britain’s COVID Booster Vaccine Drive Will Start Next Month

It was claimed that COVID booster vaccines will be extended to 32 million Britons next month.

The over 50s and immunosuppressed people, along with NHS and care home staff will be offered third doses from as soon as September 6.

Ministers hope that the vaccines will be offered at up to 2,000 pharmacies, with the goal of 2.5 million per week, and they will be dished out at the same time as flu jabs.

A newspaper outlet reported that No 10 was intending to get the most vulnerable groups jabbed by mid-December, so the vaccine has at least a fortnight to kick in before Christmas.

All eligible adults are expected to get a dose of Pfizer, regardless of which vaccine they got for their first two doses.

The latest data from Public Health England suggests the Pfizer shot is somewhat more effective against the Indian Delta strain, which could encourage the Government to adopt the mix and match approach.

But Department of Health bosses have yet to establish any official details of the UK’s booster scheme, with ministers waiting on final information from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI).

The JCVI set out interim advice on the booster programme in June, advising that, if required, the booster programme should start in September.

They said that third jabs should first be given to over 70s, over 16s who are immunosuppressed or extremely vulnerable, those living in care homes and frontline health and social care workers.

The JCVI advised that in a second stage, the boosters should be given to remaining over 50s, over 16s who are at risk from the flu or COVID and those living with immunosuppressed people.

The scientists said their final advice may vary considerably and will depend on developing data, including on how long protection lasts from two jabs.

The final recommendation from the experts is expected in the coming weeks, but a Government source told a newspaper outlet the plan was to give flu and COVID boosters at the same time in different arms but that it would depend on final JCVI guidance and coronavirus vaccine booster trials.

The source said that ministers are hoping to increase the record number of jabs given in a single day through the programme, which stands at 873,784 given on March 20.

Immunity obtained from COVID jabs lasts for at least six months in the majority of cases, and what will happen to all the double jabbed who don’t go for a booster?

So, now we have the fully vaccinated, which in some cases has caused dangerous blood clotting. Not to forget that the UK Government rushed to vaccinate their population and disregarded the manufacturer’s suggested timeframe to administer the second dose.

Now we have boosters, and if you don’t have the jab, then you have no job – it’s a never-ending cycle, and you don’t have to delve too deeply to realise that the real underlying problem with the so-called vaccines is that they leave their host far more susceptible to other strains as the effectiveness of the jab wears off.

And there’s never been a vaccine that works over the long term as they all make the host more vulnerable with each dose, not straight away, of course, just when their effectiveness begins to wane.

In other words, once you’ve had one, you’ll need another, and then a booster, and another and so on until your immune system is weak or just attacks the body instead of the virus. This is why it’s already being said that this winter as many as 30 per cent will die with a new wave, and they know what these vaccines do and they also know that through coercion and fear-mongering they’ve talked the masses into poisoning themselves in a vile mass experiment.

Donald Trump Due A $1 Million Tax Refund

Donald Trump is due a $1 million tax refund on his controversial Chicago skyscraper, but state attorney Kim Foxx’s office is attempting to prevent him from getting it.

The billionaire ex-president is in line to get a windfall after the Illinois Property Tax Appeal Board voted 5-0 to refund the amount levied on the Trump International Hotel and Tower’s commercial units for the 2011 tax year.

About $540,000 of that money will be redirected from Chicago’s public schools to pay Donald Trump.

His lawyers had previously argued that he was paying too much tax on the 98-floor building because he couldn’t obtain tenants to fill the tower’s commercial units, indicating they’d been overvalued.

Previous efforts to claw back tax failed because assessors insisted the vacant retail units added contributory value to the building and should be taxed as if they were occupied.

The Appeals Board has now sided with him, with the money that Donald Trump is owed coming out of a public kitty that pays for the Windy City’s public schools, and other government services.

According to the Chicago Sun-Times, the city’s schools would lose the biggest chunk of cash to Donald Trump, an estimated $540,000.

Cook County State Attorney’s office, led by well-known prosecutor Kim Foxx, has objected to the proposed settlement and is now attempting to hinder it.

Lawyers working for the office filed a suit with the Illinois Appellate Court in the hopes of blocking it.

The controversy is the latest episode in a long-running legal dispute over Donald Trump’s tax bills that began more than 12 years ago and has led to more than $14 million in tax breaks for Trump.

It also involves not only a former president who’s amid a multitude of legal actions but a Chicago alderman whose own legal problems has been making headlines in Chicago for months.

Alderman Edward M Burke, whose former law firm, Klafter & Burke, won the tax breaks for Donald Trump, has been indicted on federal charges that he blocked businesses from getting city permits unless they hired the firm. He’s pleaded not guilty and is awaiting trial.

The dispute over the tax bills on the high rise building has its own long history.

Originally, the state agency rejected Donald Trump’s argument that the vacant stores had no value because he couldn’t get any tenants to lease them.

A hearing officer for the state agency rejected Donald Trump’s argument that the unoccupied stores at the building had no value because he couldn’t leave them, but a staff member later wrote a report that Donald Trump was entitled to the refund.

Pulling the funds from a school budget isn’t the greatest idea, although I guess it is if you want to make Donald Trump look bad it’s the best way to go. Still, he has zero control of where the funds are found.

What they should be doing is taking the money from wasted bureaucratic spending – lunches, flights and raises, rather than taking it from children, but now they’re robbing it from Peter to pay Paul, or should I say, vulnerable school children, and I do hope that Donald Trump donates some of that money to these school children, who need it far more than he does.

But I’m sure there are numerous people out there that have been waiting for their tax refund for months, and they could be saying the same thing: ‘It’s my money, give it back to me!’

And let’s face it Donald Trump managed to lower his taxes over the years by reporting substantial losses on his businesses, and this one isn’t much different, and after the success of The Apprentice TV show he did initially pay significant taxes, $95 million over 18 years, but then he later got most of that back via a $72.9 million federal tax refund, although those funds were under review.

See the pattern forming here?

What Did Maggie Thatcher Really Think Of Her Great Friend Ronald Reagan?

While on the campaign trail at a Kent funfair before the 1950 election, a 24-year-old Margaret Roberts, later to become Britain’s first female Prime Minister, stopped at a booth to meet a fortune teller.

The future Margaret Thatcher was told that she would be great, as great as Winston Churchill, and it was a comparison that would be drawn numerous times in the decades to come.

Indeed, she would be equated to him in a way no other Prime Minister had ever been, before and since, and like his own time in office, hers was to alter the face of British politics.

It would also see an obvious flowering of the unique bond between Britain and the US, with Margaret Thatcher and her opposite number in the White House, Ronald Reagan joined in their devotion to the victorious wartime leader.

‘Churchillian rhetoric’, the historian Richard Aldous wrote, became a constant and well-choreographed feature of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher’s shared public performance.

Ronald Reagan hung a poster of Winston Churchill in the White House and filled his administration with devotees of the great man.

Both the US president and Margaret Thatcher had lived through the Second World War.

When it started, she was a schoolgirl and he was already a Hollywood star, if not quite of the first rank.

As a youngster, she’d been a regular cinema-goer and probably remembered Ronald Reagan in Dark Victory, the Bette Davis weepie that had once been Winston Churchill’s rather bizarre choice to show to the typists and servants at 10 Downing Street.

After Ronald Reagan’s passing, the veteran English journalist Sir Harold Evans would claim that the bond between him and Margaret Thatcher was closer even than that of Winston Churchill and Roosevelt, but this was far from the case.

Although she liked Ronald Reagan personally and shared his free market and anti-Communist beliefs, Margaret Thatcher had no illusions about the man who declared, somewhat bafflingly, during his presidential inauguration address: ‘To paraphrase Winston Churchill, I did not take the oath I’ve just taken with the intention of presiding over the dissolution of the world’s strongest economy.’

Not long after, Margaret Thatcher and Lord Peter Carrington, her Foreign Secretary, were talking in Downing Street, when the conversation shifted to the new president. ‘Peter,’ she said, tapping the side of her head, ‘there’s nothing there.’

Relations between the two heirs of Churchill on either side of the Atlantic were soon to become seriously strained, and inside two years of sweeping to power in 1979, all was not well for Margaret Thatcher, with unemployment and civil unrest growing, while phalanxes of economists had criticised her fiscal policies, but exactly as it had happened for the then unpopular Winston Churchill 40 years before, events came quickly to her rescue.

And it seems that several people wish that these two political colossi were running things in the country now, but why would anyone miss the mass unemployment, the war over a tiny island, and the never-ending troubles in Northern Ireland, and I’m sure she would have made everyone get their jab whether they wanted to or not.

Although we could do with a politician of substantial character now, instead we have batty Boris Johnson over here in England and Jello Joe Biden who appears to be utterly clueless on where he puts his underpants most of the time.

But of course, Ronald Reagan was a rather good president. He sorted out the oil disaster and double-digit inflation caused by Jimmy Carter’s administration, he also built the US economy and ended the Cold War, so let’s hope that somewhere out there in the US there’s another person with Reagan’s intestinal determination that can save the US from the damage that’s been sown by former president’s – at the moment, all they have are half-pints in Congress.

Wonder Drug Is Life-Saving Against COVID

GPs and MPs have welcomed a life-saving wonder drug being used to treat COVID.

The steroid Dexamethasone is frequently prescribed to at home COVID patients to prevent them from needing hospital treatment, and MPs have called on the health service to look into more at-home use of the drug to further cut cases of severe illness from COVID.

The steroid, which decreases the amount of damage in the lungs, has been mostly used in hospitals, reducing patient’s need for ventilators, and a study by NHS England earlier this year concluded that the steroid has saved at least 22,000 lives in the United Kingdom and a million globally.

It’s been hailed as proof that combined with vaccines, improved treatment means it no longer poses the same threat, and one GP prescribing it for at-home use said that it saves lives. It works and it makes sense to give it to more people to prevent them from being severely sick.

Conservative MP Neil O’Brien said that the use of Dexamethasone to treat COVID was a huge success, and one of the real bright spots of the past year, and he added the treatment breakthrough was one of the greatest British contributions to the work on the pandemic, and it was wonderful to find something that was affordable and worked.

The discovery of the treatment came after an Oxford University study of over 2,000 NHS COVID patients who were given a course of the drug over ten days.

For patients who were ill enough to need oxygen, the risk of dying dropped by a fifth, and for the most seriously sick patients on mechanical ventilators, the risk of dying decreased by over a third.

James Cartlidge, the Tory MP for South Suffolk, also praised the incredible development and said the Government should continue to give it every support.

He said that in the long run it was the most important thing and that was an underrated part of the clinical breakthrough that’s been made.

The Department of Health’s Therapeutic Taskforce spearheaded the work into the treatment, and in April this year, a new Antivirals Taskforce was created to focus on making new oral antiviral drugs available to COVID patients.

The use of Dexamethasone for patients who need oxygen is now standard care in NHS hospitals, and NHS England said Dexamethasone wasn’t routinely prescribed for COVID patients at home, in line with current guidance.

However, it needs to be fast-tracked for wider use if it’s that effective. It’s affordable and it improves the 28-day mortality if a person’s reached the point where they require oxygen, but it also has some interesting side effects and is probably best reserved for a hospital setting.

So, this treatment will keep hospital admissions down and it will be made to look like the vaccines are working, and sadly the NHS has not been treating patients properly or way too late, frequently telling people to go home to deal with it themselves.

Some people were prescribed nothing and given no advice, even those that had recently had some kind of surgery not relating to COVID, and then when they did have to go to the hospital, some were given DNRs and were finished off with morphine.

It’s just pitiful to see these things going on, and it’s occurring every day, everywhere and it needs to change, and doctors need to advise people, but it seems to be very much down to the person’s own research.

NHS Drew Up A Covert Plan To Evaluate Patients On Their Likelihood Of Survival

It’s been reported that the NHS drew up secret methods to refuse treatment to people aged over 70 in the event of a pandemic and to stop hospital care for those in nursing homes.

Classified government records were written following a pandemic training exercise in 2016, detailing strategies to stop hospitals from being overwhelmed by sacrificing vulnerable members of the population.

Under the plans, the Health Secretary could enable doctors to prioritise some patients over others who were put on an end of life pathway in the event of a severe flu pandemic, and the plans even recommended that some patients shouldn’t get any critical care at all.

Ministers have firmly denied that care homes were abandoned during the COVID pandemic despite an estimated 42,000 deaths amongst residents, and thousands of patients were discharged from hospitals into care homes to free up beds, but some believe this created a surge of infections amongst care home residents.

The records seen by a newspaper outlet show that the Government planned to triage patients based on their likelihood of survival rather than their clinical requirement if resources were stretched.

The confidential and official sensitive papers on NHS surge and triage and adult social care were given to government advisers after they were drafted in 2017 and 2018.

The records were acquired by NHS doctor Moora Qureshi who raised concerns about the health service’s readiness for a pandemic.

He filed a Freedom of Information Act to get access to the dossiers, which were initially rejected by the government before the Information Commissioner intervened and said their disclosure was in the public interest.

Working with legal firm Leigh Day, Dr Moora Qureshi passed on the reports to a newspaper outlet and accused the government of being unprofessional for not passing on the plans to medics.

He said that the Information Commissioner held that clinicians should be supported by a clear structure when designating care during a severe pandemic and that the framework required public debate.

He said that the NHS triage paper provides practical guidance for frontline workers if NHS services were overwhelmed, and why did the Department of Health, NHS England and British Medical Association (BMA) keep it a secret from healthcare professionals?

Earlier this year, it was reported that care homes were asked by the NHS to put do not resuscitate orders on all residents during the worst of the pandemic in breach of guidelines.

This might seem like standard practice for some, but this was and is a disaster, and just because you have limited resources you don’t just try to save those with the greatest chance of survival, otherwise that makes us no better than monsters.

And should we really move to a deadbeat based triage system where judgemental people based on no information and purely their own prejudices determines who lives and who dies, what constitutes living a good life and what doesn’t? Yes, let’s have these gatekeepers of good virtue determining who gets to live and who gets to die!

It’s almost like we’re preparing for nuclear war, but it doesn’t mean it’s going to happen. And in a hostage situation, the police do their utmost to save lives, but in the case of a pandemic – oh well, they’re old, they’re no use to anybody, may as well let them die! – and they call this triage, good grief.

Of course, if my 95-year-old mother were in the hospital and needed a kidney transplant and then a younger person came in needing the same, then of course I would let that younger person have the kidney. It wouldn’t be a very nice choice to make, but it would be selfish of me to give the kidney to my mother who probably wouldn’t live for much longer anyhow, and would have lived a long and hopefully good life, but that would be my choice, not some triage deciding that for me – that’s called having your civil liberties taken away from you.

Cabinet Mutiny Over Vaccine Passports

Boris Johnson is facing a cabinet revolt over vaccine passports, having been accused of denying people their basic freedoms.

The Prime Minister announced this month that certificates proving double jabs will be needed to enter indoor venues such as nightclubs from September.

Government advisers have raised concerns that such environments are conducive to super spreading and could see an enormous spike of cases later in the year, but it sparked an enormous reaction, with more than 50 Tory MPs prepared to vote against the misguided plan.

Now Boris Johnson is facing a fresh problem, with some of the opposition reported to be coming from ministers in his own cabinet, who believe the plan was railroaded through by Michael Gove.

One told a newspaper outlet that they were not happy with the government being able to use health data to cut off access to specific segments of society, and they said that this was the sort of thing that Dominic Cummings would support and that once you start doing these things where do you stop? And that they need to tread very carefully, and that there were concerns across the cabinet about denying people their freedoms.

Another added that their concern was that this was destabilising the party, and that a carrot approach was far better than a stick approach, and that they shouldn’t be taking people’s freedoms away, they should be promoting them.

Dominic Raab and Grant Shapps are amongst the senior members of the cabinet to praise businesses who’ve not permitted unvaccinated workers to return to the office, amid concerns the government was promoting a jabs for jobs policy.

Experts have warned companies doing so may face legal action, with fears of a multitude of discrimination allegations, sparking calls for ministers to outlaw such policies, and that a worker who’s forced to have a jab would be suffering an intrusion on their body, which was the advice from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

According to the group, which represents HR professionals, firms can’t coercively vaccinate their workers or potential employee’s unless legally required to do so.

Care home staff is the only area that so far is subject to compulsory COVID jabs, although reports suggest the government has been looking into other sectors too.

A newspaper outlet reported that the Prime Minister had to abandon proposed rules insisting that university students must have had jabs before attending lectures and halls of residents after questions over its legality were raised by education secretary Gavin Williamson.

We can’t have vaccine passports here for daily domestic use because it’s wrong on so many levels and it will create a two-tier society and will rob millions of even more freedoms than have now been taken away by this government.

And it looks like Boris Johnson is having his strings tightened by his puppet masters, and it just goes to show the coordinated nature of these draconian measures that has been many years in the making.

And you should remember and remember it well that governments will steal your freedoms, place your children into a life of digital ID servitude, destroy your jobs, careers, families and businesses – oh, sorry, they’ve already done that!

The biggest Increase In Fuel Bills In A Decade

Families are being warned that they should expect the biggest increase in gas and electricity bills in a decade when the energy cap is raised later this year.

Approximately 15 million homes across the United Kingdom could be affected by the decision to raise the energy price cap in October, with the average price set to rise by £150 per year.

Next week, regulator Ofgem is expected to announce a 13 per cent rise in the energy cap for half the population, with householders expected to foot substantial bills in the wake of the COVID 19 pandemic.

That decision could see the average yearly tariff increase to £1,288 for millions of homeowners, with comparable increases also expected for those in pre-pay plans.

Ofgem chief executive Jonathan Brearley advised homeowners that despite a tough 18 months, prices of fossil fuels continue to rise at an abnormal rate in a move that will ultimately hit customers pockets.

The news follows a £96 per year hike in prices after the price cap rose in April.

With providers expected to raise prices to meet the increasing cap, experts warned bills could rise by the highest amount since 2011.

Ofgem said its hands were bound on the decision because of abnormal increases in wholesale costs of fossil fuels, especially gas.

Writing in a blog earlier this week, Jonathan Brearly said that he knew that the last 18 months had been difficult for numerous households as a result of the COVID 19 crisis.

He said that increasing inflation and the forthcoming end of the furlough scheme on top of the impact that the pandemic has had on people’s resources means that family finances were tight now.

He said that sadly, against this backdrop, he was warning consumers that global prices for fossil fuels, particularly gas, were growing at an abnormal rate and that this would feed into all customer energy bills in the United Kingdom.

And that regrettably, the rise in wholesale prices would feed through to the price cap, and although the final analysis was not complete and other costs would also determine the overall level, it could add about £150 per household to the next level of the price cap.

The energy cap, introduced by the Government in January 2019, is updated twice a year and reported to have saved each household £100 a year since its inception, but in April, the cap was raised by £96 per year in a move consumer groups described as a heavy blow to a lot of homes.

And if COVID doesn’t get the elderly, then freezing them to death might!

Some people still think that the lockdowns were about protecting the vulnerable, yet Matt Hancock sent them to care homes to die.

This actually shouldn’t be happening in the 21st century, but it is because there’s a lack of investment by energy companies, and the shareholders only take the money and sweat the assets, which is why the infrastructure is disintegrating.

And what they pay the CEO’s and directors, great whacking salaries and gratuities for administration is laughable. Welcome to the world of Margaret Thatcher and the Conservatives, and all those people that voted for her.

A lot more elderly people are going to die each winter now because of this, but then, perhaps that’s the idea, and this is just another face to their democide policies, while they squeeze every last penny out of our pockets, and if you weren’t in poverty before this, then Boris Johnson will make sure you will be now.

More Than A Quarter Of Britons Worry Life Will Never Go Back To Normal

According to a shock poll, more than a quarter of Britons think life will never get back to normal after coronavirus.

Exclusive research for a newspaper outlet found 26 per cent couldn’t see our pre-pandemic lifestyles returning at any time.

The majority of those questioned by Redfield & Wilton Strategies, 38 per cent, harboured hopes that the country would be back on track at some point next year.

But the scale of the pessimism emphasises the grip ‘coronaphobia’ has taken on the nations psyche, even though virtually all lockdown restrictions have been dropped.

The survey emerged as separate Office for National Statistics (ONS) polling discovered people are still obeying COVID rules even though they’re no longer compulsory in many cases.

Between July 21 and 25, after Freedom Day in England, the proportion of adults wearing face coverings outside their homes remained firmly at 95 per cent.

Some 61 per cent said they always maintained social distancing, dropping only marginally from 63 per cent the week before.

Research for a newspaper outlet also reported that numerous Britons seem to have given up going overseas on holiday this year, amid a shambles over travel rules.

Only 10 per cent plan to travel overseas while four per cent intend to travel both abroad and domestically this summer.

More than half of respondents said they don’t plan to travel anywhere and will be staying at home, and it seems like the majority of people are fearing Boris Johnson and his crew of oddballs and ever-changing law and restrictions, than the virus itself.

And I fear that the new normal will be repeated lockdowns, jabs, continuous monitoring of our behaviour, diet and social habits et cetera, and in a couple of years, we’ll be referring to 2021 as the good old days, remembering 2019 when we had freedom of choice, when we took our own medical decisions, and when the Government were supposed to serve us.

We should all forget normal, the normal is like the Chinese social credit system, eating no meat but plenty of insect protein. No driving, no flying unless you happen to be a billionaire with a private jet, and a huge decline in population, although it’s a tad unclear how they’re going to reduce the world population to less than a billion, I’m guessing it might involve some deaths.

Don’t worry folks, I don’t own a lovely tinfoil hat, and I don’t suffer from paranoia.

Of course, nothing is supposed to go back to normal, with those still wearing masks, rolling their eyes at those without masks – just nod at them and smile, because aggressively rolling your eyes at us won’t make us appear any crazier.

And it’s nice to now see a happy face, and most people seem delighted to see a real smiling face.

We’re already a country where health and safety has gone mad, and shortly all the rules we had for COVID will be built into health and safety legislation, and the NHS and particularly GP surgeries will never be the same again.

The same will go for public sector buildings and countless shops and hospitality places – there will be rules for this and rules for that, and it’s troubling that some people not only appear to be willing to continue living restricted lives, but they seem happy about it.

And did you know that according to the Government’s own statistics 44 per cent of people hospitalised with COVID had it before they were admitted to hospital, which suggests that more than half of the people counted as COVID admission and caught it after they were admitted, but were counted anyhow and approximately 40 per cent of all UK COVID deaths were said to be from COVID, and the rest were likely to have caught it after admission with another serious illness such as cancer or a heart attack?

Approximately A Quarter Of All COVID Patients Admitted To NHS Hospitals Are Being Treated For Other Illnesses

A health service audit has unveiled that almost a quarter of patients admitted to hospitals with COVID in England are actually getting treated for a different condition.

NHS statistics show just 3,855 of the 5,021 people in hospital with COVID on Tuesday were essentially in the hospital because they were unwell from the virus. The remaining 1,166 patients were getting care for other ailments and injuries, such as a broken leg.

Daily figures on the number of COVID patients in hospitals have been released during the pandemicover-egged and have been paraded by ministers at No 10 press conferences to justify keeping lockdown restrictions in place.

But, until now, they were never broken down to show precisely how many people occupying beds were actually sick with the virus, meaning numbers included patients who just so happened to test positive.

The figures provoked critique from Tory MPs who vented that the misleading data will have been used to justify important lockdown decisions the Government has taken during the COVID emergency.

Experts claimed the numbers were especially significant and should have been collected since the start of the pandemic.

It comes after NHS England data last week revealed only 44 per cent of COVID patients tested positive before they went into the hospital, meaning many catch the virus and fall unwell while on the wards.

Meanwhile, admission rates are now slowing down, in a sign that the third wave is finally coming under control.

Scientists think that hospitalisations may even begin to fall next week, in line with cases, which have been plunging for over a week.

Before ministers pushed forward with Freedom Day this month, recently elected Health Secretary Sajid Javid asked NHS England to distinguish between the types of patients in the hospital to get a better idea of the actual state of the outbreak.

Hospitals were told to give a breakdown of those who went to hospital primarily because of COVID and were experiencing severe symptoms, as well as those who tested positive but were in the hospital for another reason.

The figures, which the NHS only began gathering on June 18, revealed the proportion of people identified as COVID patients who were in hospital due to the virus ranged between 74.9 per cent and 79.7 per cent.

It suggests daily hospitalisation figures were inflated and included incidental cases, and that in the most recent weeks, only 77.8 per cent of COVID patients were primarily sick because of the virus.

As per normal, you go into hospital with one thing and pick up something else, and it appears that if you’re unwell, the hospital is not the place to be.

Of course, our Government have been inflating the numbers since the start, and I can’t wait for their day of retribution – hopefully heads will roll.

It would be disastrous and interesting if the Government, SAGE and PHE ever correctly audited those that died with COVID and those that they said did and actually didn’t.

It’s called the ‘run over by the bus’ syndrome.

People who tested positive for COVID but then died from something totally unrelated, but still counted as a COVID death. So, how can you formulate policy and action on the wrong data?

But this was so clearly the case, and it’s disturbing that it’s only now just been reported, but then the Tories and the so-called experts over egged the virus from the start, with the help from the media, putting fear and causing hysteria from the people.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started