THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

The UK Government Will Not Rule Out The Cut-Off Of Whole Cities

The UK government has refused to rule out cutting off whole cities if Britain enters a worst-case scenario of Coronavirus, and apparently, they won’t take anything off the table, as the global death toll nears 3,000, including one Brit on a cruise boat in Japan.

The Tory Cabinet minister, who’s setting up a war room and declaring emergency laws, has warned scientists have stated it’s certain that the virus will become endemic in society.

If that happens, in the worst-case scenario the United Kingdom may need significant actions that would have social and economic disruption, which could involve closing some schools with specific risk and pulling ex doctors out of retirement.

Football matches and shows could also be forbidden and people could be urged against using public transport.

China has isolated whole cities, and it’s likely under the circumstances that the government would try to cut off a city in this country as well, although there’s a tremendous economic and social downside to that, but the government aren’t taking anything off the table at this stage because they’ve got to make sure they’ve got all the means possible if that’s what’s needed.

And they want to reduce the social and economic disruption because at this stage we still have hope, even though the numbers elsewhere are growing fast, but we still might be able to circumvent this outcome.

There are 23 cases confirmed in the United Kingdom at the moment and right now some school should be closing, although the government are thinking about a potential prohibition on big public gatherings and they’ve not ruled them out.

Emergency powers could be used to implement quarantine if patients resist, and they now can ensure they are so that the police can assist in doing just that, and stockpiles from no-deal Brexit proposals are now being retained in case of a Coronavirus crisis in Britain.

People should ensure they catch a cough or sneeze in a tissue which is then thrown away, or in the crook of their elbow, as calls to NHS 111 have shot up by more than 50 per cent.

Nevertheless, the Health Secretary has stated that at this stage people should go about their everyday business and that over 60s don’t need to avoid public transport, despite the Director-General of the World Health Organisation advising that they should.

If you’re 60+ or have an underlying condition like cardiovascular disease, a respiratory condition or diabetes, you have a greater chance of contracting severe #COVID19.

Try to avoid congested areas or places where you might associate with people who are sick.

As for the government attempting to handle a crisis, we shouldn’t trust them as far as we can throw them, particularly Boris Johnson who thought it was more important for him to go on holiday than to deal with the crisis.

And if the truth is told, this country was too slow and something should have been put in place weeks ago and Boris Johnson has been a walking disaster.

There have been three storms in three weeks that have battered this country and a global outbreak of a virus that’s started to kill off people faster than thought, and unless we’re all sleeping under a rock, all everyone appears to care about is Boris getting his rocks off with Carrie Symonds and the news of their imminent wedding and hatchling.

And we’re being told to wash our hands, does that mean we should wash our money as well?

I also sense a hint of fear starting to appear and when I was in a shop today I saw a man with a mask on, so maybe the government are intentionally keeping us in the dark as to just how big this thing is about to become.

Ironically, handles of supermarket trollies are rarely ever cleaned and then food is touched, and they say that the virus can last well over 48 hours on surfaces, and then they’re telling us that they might shut cities down, but then they tell us it’s not that serious, what are they not telling us?

Perhaps we should be listening to the World Health Organisation than Mr Hancock and the Tories, and we should be avoiding large crowds and public transport. After all, Mr Hancock couldn’t manage a fish supper, never mind a Coronavirus outbreak because all they care about is money and not public safety, and this is almost as entertaining as ‘Hancock’s half-hour’.

Bonking Boris

_methode_sundaytimes_prod_web_bin_7246045a-1939-11ea-a9c5-93ba951187e8.jpg

It’s been announced that the UK Prime Minister is to become a father for the sixth time, and will be the first Prime Minister in almost 200 years to marry while in office.

CARRIE SYMONDS.png

Boris Johnson and PR executive Carrie Symonds, 31, his live-in lover, broke the news of their happy double, and this is what she’s always wanted, a condition of their relationship, almost and he was delighted to assist.

And the Prime Minister and Miss Symonds were extremely happy to announce their engagement and that they were expecting a baby in the early summer, and it’s understood that Carrie Symonds is six months pregnant.

The couple has now been together for about two years and got engaged at the end of last year but kept it a secret from all but their most intimate friends until now, but an excited Carrie Symonds who’s the first unmarried partner of a sitting Prime Minister happily posted an Instagram image of Boris Johnson kissing her on the cheek.

She said that she wouldn’t have normally have posted this kind of stuff on Instagram but that she wanted her friends to find out from her, even though many already knew but some of her friends didn’t, and that they got engaged at the end of last year and that they’ve got a baby hatching early in the summer and that they feel especially fortunate.

The shock news came just 11 days after Boris Johnson, 55, settled with his estranged wife Marina Wheeler, with whom he has four children, aged 20 to 26, but their divorce is yet to be settled, so pausing the date of his and Carrie Symonds marriage, but of course, they’ll want to wed quickly to avoid having an unwed mum at No 10.

And this partly illustrates why Boris Johnson has been laying low of late.

Carrie Symonds is excited but she will continue to work on her environmental projects. Boris Johnson further has a fifth child, who was born in 2009 after an entanglement with art consultant Helen Macintyre.

Former Chancellor Sajid Javid was amongst the first to congratulate Boris Johnson and Carrie Symonds, tweeting that it was wonderful news. The former Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson also sent the smiling couple her best wishes.

They will become the third pair in recent history to have a baby while living in Downing Street, following in the footsteps of Tony and Cherie Blair and David and Samantha Cameron.

The latest Prime Minister’s baby could have been conceived at the Queen’s Balmoral estate last autumn when Boris Johnson and Carrie Symonds spent a night at the castle but returned to London the following day due to the gathering Brexit impasse.

It was later reported that the Queen was not comfortable with them staying overnight given royal etiquette normally forbids unwed couples from doing so.

Cherie Blair had also previously revealed that her and Tony’s fourth child, son Leo, was conceived at Balmoral in 1999 during the Prime Minister’s yearly appointment with the Queen.

Cherie Blair said that out of pure confusion, she’d left her contraception at home.

MARINA WHEELER.png

Boris Johnson and Carrie Symonds became close when his second marriage to Marina Wheeler hit the rocks about two years ago when he was Foreign Secretary, and Carrie accompanied him to everything from private dinner dates to high-powered political gatherings, and their close association flowered into romance as they discussed their shared interests and Westminster gossip.

Friends first caught wind that he fancied Carrie Symonds, then Tory director of communications, in 2018 when they attended the party’s Black and White fundraising ball.

They barely took their eyes off each other and six days later Carrie Symonds tweeted enthusiastically about a speech Boris Johnson had made about Brexit. That evening they were spotted tucking into a Valentine’s supper in London’s Covent Garden.

The pair went to remarkable lengths to meet during and after work and Boris Johnson sent a car to pick up Carrie Symonds from a wedding held near Chevening, his country retreat in Kent.

She has mostly stayed out of the spotlight since he took over from Theresa May as Prime Minister in July, and Carrie Symonds was barely seen at Boris’s side on the General Election campaign trail late last year, although she was pictured waving with him outside No 10 following the Torie’s thumping victory.

The duo chose to live at the more spacious four-bedroom flat at No 11 Downing Street rather than the two-bedroom official residence at No 10, and where they share Jack Russell-cross rescue pup Dilyn.

Carrie Symonds had not been seen recently, giving rise to Westminster rumours that she was hiding a secret, and last week she was missing from his arm at the Black and White ball but she was with him at Chevening last weekend.

And she’s hired a personal adviser on a six-figure salary, paid for by the Conservative Party.

Sarah Vaughan-Brown, 45, former director of communications for ITN, will serve as adviser and gatekeeper to the new first lady of Downing Street.

hires-homepage-allegra-and-boris-johnson-dafydd-joenes.jpg

Boris Johnson met his first wife, Allegra Mostyn-Owen, while they were students at Oxford. They married in 1987 but the union was annulled in 1993. That year he married Marina Wheeler.

The last Prime Minister to wed in office was Lord Liverpool who married Mary Chester in 1822. His first wife Louisa died aged 54 the previous year.

Boris Johnson is further thought to be the first Prime Minister to divorce in office since Augustus Fitzroy, the 3rd Duke of Grafton. An act of parliament enabled him to leave his first wife Anne in 1769. He promptly married Elizabeth Wrottesley and the pair went on to have 13 children.

In the meantime, pitches are now being made by Members of Parliament for the Prime Minister’s marriage to take place in their constituency.

Boris Johnson was questioned last year about a possible proposal and he was asked if he was going to buy Carrie a rock any time soon. The flustered Prime Minister responded that it was a pretty good question.

Now exhibiting the extent of his feelings, the Prime Minister spoke with a huge smile that he was really happy, but the first thing that crosses the mind is that when this kid is 16, he’s going to be ancient.

And it’s not so long ago since the police were summoned and he was allegedly knocking her up in a different way. Let’s hope he can handle the larger withdrawal agreement better than he handled this one.

So, there’s going to be another little Boris to add to his growing collection. Still, I guess this story has taken the attention off the Home Secretary for a bit, hasn’t it?

But how many people truly care? After all, it never seems like he cares, he’s never seen out and about with his children and the only time you might see him pushing a pram this time is if he needs some good PR.

And a sceptical person might say that the time of the release of this news was simply intended to take the heat off bully Priti Patel and vacant Boris Johnson hiding when the country is in crisis with flooding and the Coronavirus and that some media are simply doing the governments bidding by putting this in the headlines instead of something that matters to the country, well, that’s what a cynical person might say.

I wonder how much this baby and the wedding will cost the taxpayer? Or will his Russian compatriots offer to put in a bit?

Another baby on the horizon, more of Boris’s offspring plotted around the United Kingdom. Hopefully, this union works out and if not, then I hope that Boris is going to support his child because there’s nothing to be proud of getting several women pregnant and then disappearing, and he seems to have a history of that.

Carrie Symonds has done the easiest part with Boris Johnson, but the most difficult part will be hanging onto him.

And there’s been a shocking scandal on the news about single mother’s with children and how they’re now seen as the scourge of society and now we have Carrie Symonds, unmarried and pregnant! One rule for them and another for the bastardised.

Should we feel happy for Boris Johnson and Carrie Symonds? Probably not! Should we be happy for the baby, well the jury is still out on that one, although we can’t condemn the child that is developing in her belly, for it has no concept into what it’s going to be born into.

No one in the real world can truly afford to have a child, but most people want a child, it’s called procreation and it’s what makes this world what it is. And whether married or not, no one truly knows if they have a rock-solid relationship or marriage or the means to raise a child because anyone can end up being out of work at any time, it’s not an exact science.

Boris Johnson has always lived a privileged life and most certainly always will and he can afford to have as many kids as he wants, whether he’s around long enough to see this one grow up is another story.

And then there’s the child that Boris Johnson seems to want to hide and who never seems to have their father around, and this is all great news for Boris Johnson, now it means he can take another mistress.

Maybe he was told to make a baby for public relation purposes, it’s been done before many times and what a fine picture it would make, the girlfriend, the baby, the dog and Boris Johnson. I bet the cat at No 10 is feeling a tad sidelined, just like his other children.

And why should the people of this country be interested when there are far more important things going on in this country? And there have been much more interesting couples at No 10, yet Boris Johnson and Carrie Symonds appear to the most phoney couple going, just so that they can hide the dirt under the carpet while letting the honeymoon with the voters last a tad longer.

They say that you should lead by example and this is the example that Boris is showing the youths of today and the right way to start a family, but of course, he won’t impute himself! But look, folks, this is the modern way to start a family. Yes, impregnate as many women as you can and have loads of babies!

Two wives, one mistress, and one young lady and 6 kids. He doesn’t need to ponce off the state, he can ponce off the taxpayers. We might pay for his wages, but we don’t want to be paying for his children as well. If he wanted children, he should have been paying for them himself.

Some people might say that she’s finally trapped him but I’m sure he’ll find a way to untrap her later on. After all, he’s not a one-woman man, when he seems to spread it about like Lurpak.

At least we’ll know where all our taxes are going. Probably paying for the nanny who will undoubtedly raise the child and particularly when Carrie Symonds stated she was hatching a baby. Maybe an alien life form, reptiles, fowl or Platypuses…

And there are people out there that whine about fathers having loads of children they don’t bother about and fathering with many mothers, so why is this okay now that Boris Johnson is doing it? And are Boris Johnson and Carrie Symonds going to have a private wedding or are we all going to have to pay for the security on it?

Let’s face it, he’s shafted everything he’s touched, why quit now? After all, he was still married to Marina Wheeler when he knocked up Carrie Symonds – well, here’s a man of character and integrity… Not!

And when Boris said that he was pulling out of the EU, maybe he should have used a condom – he might have got a better settlement.

DRIVEWAY ROBBERY

A strange legal loophole means anyone can now park on your drive and there’s not much you can do about it, and there have been several cases in the United Kingdom where homeowners have been stuck with a stranger’s vehicle on their driveway, only to be told neither the police nor local authorities have the power to remove it.

Because in the case of a stranger parking on your drive, a problem occurs when the boundary between criminal and civil law is clouded.

If a vehicle is parked on a public road and it’s obstructing your drive, local authorities can issue a fine, but once the vehicle moves onto your driveway, it’s technically on private property and local councils have no power.

Councils are expected to remove discarded vehicles from both public and private lands, but if the motor in question is taxed, insured and has a legitimate MOT and isn’t in a hazardous condition, they’re unlikely to move it on private land.

The police will acknowledge the vehicle is technically trespassing, but they’ll classify it as a civil offence, meaning you would require an eviction notice from the courts and then you would be forced to begin a long and costly legal process.

A solicitor would be able to get the civil court’s consent to hunt down the legal owner and a judge would have to make its removal, an order of the court. Court enforcers would then be the ones to take action and have the random vehicle removed.

But all of this court action would be at your expense and could end up costing thousands simply to free up your driveway. So, if you don’t want to go through the court process, you only really have a few choices.

You can park your vehicle on the driveway, blocking in the stranger’s motor, as long as you don’t obstruct any part of the public road. You would then have to hope that you catch the owner returning to their vehicle and then they oblige when you ask them to move.

Or you could hire a private tow truck to have it removed, which will see you fork out at least £100, but keep in mind that any damage incurred when the vehicle is being towed could be thrown back at you by the owner, and you would be liable to pay for it.

You could also fit a barrier or parking bollard on your drive to section it off and would feasibly save you money in doing this, but strangely, the system appears to support the offender over the victim in this situation.

Boris Johnson Acknowledges That £111 A Month Is Not Enough To Survive On Universal Credit

Boris Johnson has agreed that £111 a month of Universal Credit isn’t enough to survive on after being faced with the frightful case of a pregnant woman.

The Tory leader, who previously called his £250,000 newspaper salary as chicken feed confessed after he was quizzed by SNP MP Mhairi Black.

Mhairi Black raised the case of a constituent who is eight and a half months pregnant and on the new six in one benefit, which includes a five-week wait for the first payment.

That delay leads to many families taking out advances, which is then paid back out of their future benefits to cover the gap, but they’re then hit by the repayments, which calculated to £50 million in one month alone last year.

And after deductions, including an advance, this unfortunate pregnant lady was left with the grand sum of £111 a month to feed herself, to heat her home and care for her child, and she said that she’d be delighted to give the Prime Minister more details so he could help but that she wouldn’t ask him in principle.

Additional details of the case, including the woman’s name or details of why she only ended up with £111 were not immediately accessible.

But DWP statistics say the average Universal Credit payment is £720 a month, though the information on deductions is less clear, and Boris Johnson responded that he was happy to look at the case or to do whatever was needed to assist with specific cases. However, continued that in the round, Universal Credit has helped and is helping 200,000 people into employment.

And Boris Johnson worded his response carefully just weeks after being slapped down by the official statistics watchdog for making a fraudulent claim about Universal Credit, and in January the Prime Minister announced to PMQs the six in one benefit has resulted in getting 200,000 people into employment.

However, the UK Statistics Authority said his claim was incorrect because the figure is only predicted once the benefit was completely rolled out in 2024.

But it’s all come to little to late for the majority and it’s okay for the government to pat themselves on the back with those changes but it won’t bring back the victims who’ve died.

Suicide doesn’t just encompass one effect of someone just feeling down, it has several issues and the Universal Credit is at fault and the government who are attempting to cover their tracks, and who are acting like nefarious low life vermin pigging it through the trough as ordinary people suffer.

The cost of peers expenses and daily attendance allowance grew by 29 per cent in the year to last March to £23 million. Lord Paul claimed £47,885 in expenses despite his family having a £2 billion estate.

The business magnate, 89, spoke only once in the Lords and more than 110 peers didn’t make any verbal or composed contribution to the House throughout that period, but claimed a total of £1 million and yet some people of the United Kingdom seem to think this is acceptable.

This is unacceptable and some people do whine about it but these leaches are still allowed to carry on as normal.

Universal Credit is an unjust policy and it serves no one that needs help and the rules are so complicated that even the benefits staff that are trained to follow those rules haven’t got a clue, so what chance have the neediest and defenceless in society got?

Well, zero chance and was that by accident or design?

Either way, Universal Credit is cruel and targets the disabled and strips them of their benefits which they genuinely deserve and need. However, some people dislike the fact that people are getting money that they so justly deserve, but those people worship at the political altar of the champagne socialists and are deceived enough to believe that they are them, but then such is socialism, ‘Do as I say, and not as I do’.

One day the penny will drop and hopefully really soon because Boris Johnson only helps the richest get richer.

And yes, Universal Credit was designed as a benefit for getting people back into work, but there’s a group of claimants that will never be able to return to paid work, and severely disabled claimants have been transferred from legacy benefits like the ESA Support Group.

However, what the DWP doesn’t understand is that the disabled are being beaten to the point where they end up destitute or will end up committing suicide et cetera because they can’t handle the stress of Universal Credit or the sanction regimes encompassing Universal Credit.

Universal Credit has proven to be a political decision to try and force as many as they can into work whatever the consequence, but time and time again it’s been shown to destroy lives and cause poverty.

And it’s simple in the eyes of the Tories who lie about helping the most defenceless in society so that they come across as the caring party, whilst behind the scenes, they give instructions to private companies assessing them to get them off benefits, no matter how sick or unemployable they are.

Then there’s this latest report that the DWP have mysteriously or inadvertently shredded the report that demonstrates a link between Universal Credit, sanctions and deaths.

But there’s always a cover-up somewhere where reports into people who’ve killed themselves after benefits have been stopped, and it’s not what you know that matters, it’s what this government tries to prevent you from knowing that matters.

And heating your home is crucial because if your body temperature does down below 95 degrees you can fall into hyperthermia, and hyperthermia doesn’t discriminate age.

Heat is vital for a decent quality of life, the same as food is essential, but then some might say that’s an extravagance as well, and what about those that need Oxygene to keep them alive?

Cold associated ailments can cause pneumonia and heart attack as well as hyperthermia, yet people are content to punish this pregnant lady to illness.

We might not agree with young girls getting pregnant that can’t afford them, but they’re happy to condemn a child to a freezing home, and then there are damp related illnesses because a cold home equals damp, which will ultimately rot the home to its core, which will then cause respiratory problems – no thermal underwear will sort that out!

Boris Johnson declared that £111 a month Universal Credit was not enough to live on, however, the Lords get £325 a day for just turning up, that’s a bigger increase over a week than people are being made to live on for a whole month on Universal Credit.

That’s a £125 per week increase, while those on Universal Credit have to try and survive on £111 per month, even though Boris Johnson acknowledges it’s not enough to live on, well, that wouldn’t even cover the cost of his favourite bottle of wine which costs £180 a bottle.

But then there are those people who would say that this woman is being compensated for screwing up their lives because they have to pay her taxes, well they’re certainly some form of alien life, what would they rather she did, give up her baby for adoption and get a job?

I’m sure the child would thank her in years to come and those people that think of themselves before having any compassion for others certainly are not of parental material, and it’s somewhat apparent that these people are not fit to be called human, and just when you think that people couldn’t sink any lower, they manage to amaze you.

I guess we shouldn’t care less of what other people think of us, but we shouldn’t be condemning people either and for those who are ill and have become unemployed because of illness, the stigma is colossal.

We know nothing about this woman, yet people out there have deemed her a waste and an idiot, and it makes me furious when people are allowed oxygen and a platform to air their inhumanity, and Boris Johnson himself said candidly that he couldn’t sustain on the Ministers wages of £140,000 a year.

Boris Johnson also said that £250,000 a year as a journalist was peanuts, says the man who’s never had to do a real days work in his life, but he can give out billions in foreign aid while UK citizens are being left hungry, homeless and more. He should try living on £111 a month, well, that would be gone on his first lunch break at some fancy restaurant.

But the most fun fact concerning ‘aid’ in the budget is repaid multiple times over in excessive trade concessions we lever out of folks overseas, and we’ve robbed the world for centuries, then given ‘aid’ in exchange, which was greatly beneficial to us and damaging to everybody else. It’s like mugging somebody on their way to the bank, then loaning them the bus fare home so you can burgle them.

The United Kingdom has become so unbelievable, and the author of that disaster gets a flaming knighthood, whilst his pride and joy has forced countless people into dire hardship while costing the country countless millions, so whose head should roll, let’s have a vote, the architect or the quartermasters who ordered these Draconian cuts?

Universal Credit is helping thousands back into work, NO, it’s helping thousands into poverty, and how can it be helping when thousands that receive Universal Credit are still having to rely on foodbanks?

And Universal Credit is saving the taxpayer money, NO, because it costs more to administer than it saves.

The fact is that Universal Credit is merely intended to put people into debt along with forcing them to take zero-hour contracts which the Universal Credit payments system can’t cope with.

And the reason the DWP quoted £720 is that it includes the money for rent, so if you take off what the rent is, that’s what people have got to live on for a month and it’s shameful.

People have to leave work for a diversity of reasons but when it’s for ill health, some people have to wait months for their Capability to Work Assessment which enables them to get more money. In the meantime, they have to use food banks to survive, which in the meantime is making them sicker.

And when people realise that a Lord gets £323 per day for simply turning up and then signs in for the taxpayer’s money, no wonder tomorrow’s children won’t live to a good age, and the outlook for unhealthy children living from food banks and receiving universal coffin is harsh.

But this isn’t about a woman being pregnant, this is about the foolishness of Universal Credit because £111 a month is not enough to live on pregnant or not, and sometimes people end up needing relief and most people in ordinary jobs are one paycheck away from disaster if you happen to lose your job.

US private Healthcare Company Handed Over £7 Million

A US healthcare firm praised by Donald Trump has been given £7 million to help the NHS distinguish its most costly patients, and it’s running a nine-month programme to teach managers to classify people according to their risk of illness.

The move has sparked concerns that more could be turned down for ops because of factors like age and weight, and it boosts fears the NHS could be on the table in a trade deal despite Boris Johnson’s claims it’s not for sale.

The settlement was agreed between NHS England and Optum, which assesses patients for America’s privatised insurance led system, and it divides NHS patients into high, medium and low-risk groups and identifies ‘rising risk groups’ such as those at risk of Type 2 diabetes.

The training has been spread out all over the country including Dorset, Berkshire, Lancashire, Cumbria and Leeds, and managers state that it’s helped them allocate resources more efficiently as they attempt to conserve cash amid the historic Tory funding pressure.

But half of the local care groups are now defining who can have a routine procedure such as cataract surgery and hip and knee replacements.

These revelations are the latest in a lengthy list of private sector involvement, and a typical example of our corroding NHS and the possibility of people being shut out of treatment flies in the face of a service based on the belief that everyone’s needs must be met.

But what’s even more terrifying is the notion that this training could be rolled out more extensively and NHS England, including chairman Lord Prior, has held a series of meetings with Optum in recent years.

2_UK-PM-Johnson-Greets-Austrias-Chancellor-Kurtz-In-Downing-Street.jpg

Well, that didn’t take Boris Johnson long, did it? So, there are lots of reasons he should now stay in hiding until he’s made his money and can retreat to the Caribbean, but still close enough to buy his healthcare in the US.

And is any of this training necessary? Because it should be glaringly evident which patients are high risk, and why is all this money being given for information? Particularly when Boris Johnson promised to keep the NHS a free treatment for all.

It would be pretty straightforward for American companies to provide a consensus for all, because now they’ll have access to medical records, buying trends and social media posts, leading to many not being able to get health cover, or paying through the nose for it.

And now’s the fear of why this information is being paid for, especially if Boris Johnson is going to keep the NHS promise of treating us all. Well, it’s all about taking back control! And that’s not very patriotic handing the contract to an American firm when that money could have created British jobs.

Boris Johnson has always said that the NHS wasn’t for sale, that was Boris Johnson’s own words, which now makes him a deceitful pretentious twit, and to be honest, it’s not for sale, they’re just giving it away – £6 million of NHS taxpayer’s money to do what hospital management and Consultants do already.

They said it wasn’t up for sale but look what happened to British Gas, the railways and Royal Mail, and we’re just lied to time and time again, and all while Boris Johnson thinks that the working class can kiss his backside because he’s got the keys to No 10 at last.

But many might say that doing nothing is bad for us. Well, I hate to burst your bubble but it appears that everything we do is harmful to us in some form or another. Walking or running, breathing (hello pollution).

Too much salt, too much sugar, sleeping too much or not enough, the list goes on because at least every few months there’s at least one story of something to avoid, as big boffins say it’s bad for you.

Boris Johnson will ultimately sell our NHS to the Americans, and the noodles of this country asked for it. Well, now they’ll get it. But we had the greatest health service in the world, and now the simpletons in the United Kingdom will willingly give it away to those American opportunists.

All that I can see now is a rebellion in the United Kingdom because Boris Johnson has effectively corroded our democracy with his utter hogwash, and it seems that now our real master is Donald Trump, so we should get used to this. Can’t wait for those sparkling new blue passports, and was it worth it for a shiny blue passport?

And so it continues, the constant stream of the NHS being sold out to US health firms – some money man in the United States will be making decisions about our health, that’s for sure! And it wouldn’t surprise me if our first contact with our health service will be via Artificial Intelligence because GPs are about to become a thing of the past and surgeons will follow.

And as predicted, the first stage of privatisation begins. Of course, there will be deniers of this, solely because it’s embarrassing for the government, and this will put us at the mercy of Donald Trump who we all know is just like Boris Johnson, or is it the other way round? But either way, they’re both commingled liars.

Private health care will bring even more incomprehensible deaths to the disadvantaged and vulnerable and this is precisely what the millionaires thrive on, and the Tories certainly know how to spend our taxes.

It was nice knowing you NHS, but alas, soon it will be gone, and the only time we will see it again is in history books.

However, we were warned that this might happen and no one objected.

But the consensus seems to be that if you’re overweight, smoke or drink too much, what’s the point of wasting money treating you, but then we have all that genetically modified food, which has been extensively publicised as a way to feed the world, but could eating it just make our eating problems worse?

Since it has been shown GMOs don’t increase yields or make food more nutritious, and might even contain higher deposits of dangerous pesticides, but in light of a list of studies, showing that progress towards tackling obesity around the globe has been unacceptably slow and that in less than a generation, rates of childhood obesity has grown dramatically worldwide.

People don’t eat GMO food and even in countries where GMOs are everywhere, it’s rare that customers walk into a shop and buy GMO ears of corn or soya beans. Instead, GMOs are turned into ingredients for highly processed ready meals, pre-packaged foods and takeaways.

The main by-product of GMOs are fats and sugars, and GMOs when they’re not being turned into biofuels which feed no one, are being turned into oils, such as corn and soya and even cottonseed oil and sugar syrups such as high fructose corn syrup and to a lesser degree sugar from GM sugar beets.

In other words, what GMOs have most successfully done is provide cheap unhealthy ingredients to the junk food industry, and consuming this food has resulted in many health deficits, of which obesity is just one.

And companies that produce these kinds of food may even be cynically maintaining the obesity status quo, especially in children because fat children are an investment in future sales, and the food industry has a special interest in targeting children since repeated exposure to processed foods and sweetened drinks in infancy builds taste preferences, brand loyalty and high profits.

It’s easy to understand how consuming junk foods could cause weight gain, but in Norway, a group of scientists found that GMOs may increase weight gain in other less visible ways.

Their work revealed that animals maintained on a diet of GM corn put on weight and were less able to digest proteins and suffered immune system problems.

Examining the effects on salmon, researchers found definite distinctions between fish being fed GM food and those on a non-GM diet. Several of the changes were within the normal range, but, the fish fed GM showed a distinct trend.

The fish were somewhat larger, they ate slightly more, their intestines had a different microstructure, they were less able to digest proteins, and there were some differences in their immune system.

Blood samples also showed some change in the blood.

This incapacity to digest proteins has important implications for health because proper digestion of protein is essential for many biological functions which include providing the body with amino acids, which suggests that eating GMOs could be linked not only to a surge in obesity but increases in many modern illnesses such as diabetes, digestive disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, colitis, autism spectrum disorders (ASD) (ADD), autoimmune diseases, sexual dysfunction, sterility, asthma, COPD and more.

The point that the government are attempting to make here is, why waste good money on peasantry, especially if us peasants don’t follow the lifestyle that they believe we should, saying that the NHS should quit treating people who don’t toe the line, but they don’t say what motives compel such radical behaviour. Could it be that he’s swallowed Raspudom’s propaganda regarding eugenics and bioethics? And some jumped up self-righteous ogre dictate should not be breathing down our necks, saying who the NHS should treat and who they shouldn’t.

And so it begins, and this is just the start. Boris Johnson lied to the British people and now he’s breaking a verbal contract with the electing public.

Not to worry though, most of what was once our NHS has already gone, and this was always on the cards and why people believed anything Boris Johnson has to say is beyond me, and our government are merely parasites feasting on the flesh of its subjects.

Jeremy Corbyn Meets Families Who Were Hit By Floods

Jeremy Corbyn visited flood-hit families while Boris Johnson proceeded to evade demands to see for himself the destruction unleashed by Storm Dennis. The Prime Minister was also still resisting requests to trigger a COBRA meeting to organise attempts to assist householders battered by the destruction.

The Labour leader toured flood-damaged homes in Rhydyfelin near Pontypridd and blasted the Conservative leader for spending the week holed up at a country estate in Kent and his No 10 bunker.

Firefighter leaders also reprimanded Boris Johnson’s response as a shambles and accused him of cowering away, and angry householders urged the Prime Minister to leave No 10 and the Government’s grace and favour retreat, Chevening to see the aftereffect of the rainfall.

Selena Adamiec, 36, who showed Jeremy Corbyn round her end of terrace house, revealed she was awoken by a tremendous bang at 3 am as a wall outside her home collapsed under the weight of water.

She stated that she heard this huge bang and it was a warning for them to move fast as water rushed down the hillside, along the road and into her street on the Wordsworth Gardens social housing estate.

Selena said it was terrifying, the water was piling up, and that she’d only been in her home for a year and that they’d just finished decorating, and that was the sickening thing.

The mother to seven-year-old Jacob said she had to rip up carpets and was left to clean up when the waters subsided and standing next to Jeremy Corbyn, Selena glorified his visit, saying that this was the reason she voted for him.

She said that she didn’t know why Boris Johnson hadn’t shown his face but the fact that Jeremy Corbyn did mean a lot because it meant that they’d been recognised in this disaster.

Selena said that she believed that Boris Johnson should have at least had a look, whether he knocked on people’s doors or not, he should have at least come and had a look at the destruction it has left them in.

Next door, her neighbour Theresa Davies, 40, opened her back door so water could run through her house, in one end and out the other as the weekend floods erupted.

Theresa Davies managed to save the cushions from her sofa, but carpets and treasured possessions were lost and talking over the noise of three heavy-duty dryers, the mum of three said that she lost a huge cardboard box of all her children’s baby photos.

She said they weren’t worth much but that they were important to her and that they could never be replaced, and showing Jeremy Corbyn phone images of her flooded home, she said the entire house was swimming with water and that it was horrific, and she said that it meant a lot that he had come to see for himself.

Theresa Davies said that they normally get overlooked up there and she thought it was quite ludicrous the Prime Minister hadn’t been and that she was disappointed and that he could have bestowed a bit more concern.

It was like something out of a disaster movie as sandbags and floodgate panels stood in front of houses along the street as residents braced themselves for further downpours, and as hail pounded the estate, Jeremy Corbyn said that he thought the Prime Minister should visit these places.

And simply visiting people, speaking to them and listening to them, you can learn a great deal about the reality of what a flood is and it’s tragic, hearing stories of people losing their furniture and seeing their homes destroyed.

The Prime Minister must be there in places where there are difficulties, whether there’s an election or not and Boris Johnson should go and visit them, talk to them, and listen to them.

Boris Johnson should go and see what it’s like to have sewage water in your kitchen, go and see what it’s like to lose all your possessions, and the Prime Minister should think about how he would feel if his home was flooded.

However, a chief ally of the Prime Minister was sent out to defend Boris Johnson for ignoring victims and Minister Nadhim Zahawi maintained it was more important to get money to those affected than for them to see their Prime Minister in person.

And it was said that Jeremy Corbyn shouldn’t be seeking to politicise the floods and that he should be supporting the Government’s move to help and work with emergency staff who are working tirelessly to support everyone concerned.

Jeremy Corbyn dismissed it as complete rubbish but Tory claim his was a political stunt and Jeremy Corbyn said that it wasn’t politicising but that it was coming to listen to people, to hear about their experiences of what they’d been through.

The Prime Minister was further attacked by the Fire Brigades Union who said that funding for fire and rescue services in England had been cut by £141.5 million over the four-year local government finance settlement, 2016/17 to 2020/21, including an £8.7 million cut to the services covering regions with severe ‘risk to life’ flood warnings.

It highlighted how Hereford and Worcester had funding cut by £1.9 million – 19.8 per cent, as they suffered severe flooding from the River Severn in Upton-upon-Severn and the River Wye in Hampton Bishop.

Gloucestershire had been cut by £1.3 million -18.7 per cent despite facing critical flooding from the Severn at Uckinghall, and the Prime Minister has shown zilch leadership as flooding destroys communities.

Firefighters are on the ground fighting to keep people’s homes and businesses safe while Boris Johnson quails in Westminster.

Of course, flooding is nothing new and will only get worse with climate change, but our capacity to tackle its outcomes has been completely weakened by the absence of long term planning from this mess of a government.

The Tories have cut fire and rescue funding, mishandled flood defences and refused to recognise in law the role of firefighters and control staff in responding to these emergencies and Boris Johnson should be ashamed of himself.

Priti Patel Left Officials Trembling

Merciless Priti Patel left officials trembling with her demanding behaviour as a Minister, and the Home Secretary has been accused of attempting to expel a senior civil servant, as her department was plunged into a tumultuous bullying row.

The Home Secretary reportedly demanded the removal of her permanent secretary Sir Philip Rutnam, who’s said to have raised concerns about her behaviour.

Priti Patel has supposedly earned herself a reputation for being cold and difficult, and if she took against an official, she would let it be known and she would demand people to be dismissed from their jobs.

And it seems she’s pretty robust, highly demanding and wants impossible stuff done immediately, and won’t take no for an answer and people have trembled in meetings with her.

A source said that Priti Patel’s ruthless behaviour has been amplified since Boris Johnson’s aide Dominic Cummings arrived at No 10, and that she inherently hates civil servants and that she thinks they’re risk-averse.

She thinks they’re trying to stop what she wants to accomplish. She’s brutal and with Dominic Cummings on board, it’s been magnified, and the dispute between Sir Philip and Priti Patel reportedly followed orders from the Home Secretary, some of which officials said were illegal.

The pair had major arguments about the rule of law, but any ally of Priti Patel said they didn’t recognise these claims, and a source said they firmly refuted allegations of bullying or belittling and had never seen any proof of this, instead, describing her as difficult, so she fits in well with the rest of the government.

They’re all a pack of well-heeled elitists, many of who are owners of conglomerates and employ managers to cover their incompetence.

All you have to do is look at those at No 10, who I wouldn’t trust to make a cup of tea and they look as stupid as they act, like old Etonian schoolboys out for a bit of fun. Fun for them, but trouble for the rest of us, and who’s going to pick up the pieces after they’re gone?

And they’ve marginalised or removed able politicians who disagree with their leader, and this has the effect of diminishing the accessible supply of expertise and thus creating an echo chamber come self-appreciation society that suffers from groupthink.

The top people, positive in their ability but mindful that they have blind spots, always select teams with differing views and experiences. Top leaders don’t want yes men and women, but Boris Johnson and his buddies do!

And it seems that MPs are terrified of her being victorious because if she does a great job over the next decade then she will become leadership material.

However, if she boots them all out, other than the ones that will leave in their droves, who will do all the work to make all the departments and systems function? Because no one will come and work for a bully.

I’m all for reform, but not at the cost of someone’s mental health or if it involves bullying tactics, and there has to be a line between the well-being of workers and being able to call out complacencies and ineptitude within departments, and with how the civil service work, this is the childish attitude that we should be expecting, a lot of shouting and a lot of whining.

Plus they get paid a bomb for doing essentially nothing, and after a lifetime of easy work, they get called out and told they have to start earning their money, so a few tears of improper treatment and bullying is the least we can expect.

skynews-boris-johnson-arrives-downing-street_4918782.jpg

And then we have Boris Johnson, who’s been quite the absentee since the election, although the fool does rear his messy head on occasion, and the large preponderance of civil servants are pompous, lethargic and grossly overcompensated pencil pushers.

Perhaps it’s time we had a Home Secretary with a pair, to sort it all out, and people who get all upset when asked to do their work, which is pretty well paid, are out of their depth and they wouldn’t last a week in private industry.

Men are afraid of robust women that won’t be pushed around, and Priti Patel seems like she is one of those people who won’t stand for freeloading MPs, but she still comes across as a mean prejudiced bully, and that has nothing to do with gender.

Priti Patel supported the death penalty, but then denied she ever supported wanting it to be reintroduced, and she used her first interview as Home Secretary to say that she wanted offenders to truly feel terror, although she didn’t say what offenders, was that all of them, or just some of them?

The fervent Brexiteer was appointed to the Home Office by Boris Johnson after two years as a backbencher, provoking debate over her past support for capital punishment. However, Priti Patel then insisted that her previous claims didn’t mean she was an ardent supporter of the death penalty.

She further said that her comments on the matter were constantly taken out of context and alleged that footage of her supporting the death penalty, may have been clipped.

Priti Patel was fired as International Development Secretary by Theresa May in 2017 after holding undeclared meetings with the Israeli government but made a remarkable return to government, under Boris Johnson.

And in an interview, she claimed she’d previously been questioned about deterrents in crime and said that there needed to be more restraints. She further stated that she believed that we had a criminal justice system that continuously fails the country and that we’ve seen murderers, rapists and people who’ve perpetrated the most disgusting atrocities in society, go into prison and then are discharged from prison to go out into the community to then re-offend and do the types of crime they have committed again and again.

She said that it was shocking and that on that reason alone she would support the reintroduction of capital punishment to serve as a restraint because there should be enough deterrents in this country for offenders.

And that if you had the ultimate penalty for the murder of policemen and other horrendous crimes, she was certain it would serve as a deterrent and that we should be conveying a clear signal to people that crime doesn’t pay. That the punishment must fit the crime and that she did support capital punishment.

She continued that her focus was to restating commitment to law and order and restating commitment to the people on the front line, the police. See, she didn’t mention the people of this country! And she said that the important thing was that they needed to empower them to end criminality – she made it sound like everyone in the United Kingdom is a criminal.

And according to Priti Patel, the Conservative Party is the party of law and order, full stop! But Priti Patel’s idea that making people terrified of the police will cut crime shows just how out of touch she is with what’s driving some young people into crime in the first place.

Frequently young people say they carry knives because they’re scared of other young people in gangs and we need more police so these young people can feel less fearful and for the police to be there for them and not because the police add to their anxieties, and Priti Patel is just ranting like an uneducated thug, and give a Tory an inch, they’ll take a mile.

At the end of the day, Priti Patel just wants some sort of reaction, which is pathetic really and it’s about time these Tories realised that they’re nothing more than public servants and not above the law either.

And Priti Patel might seem like she’s got a backbone, but there’s a difference between having a backbone and bullying, and now apparently MPs are trembling – well, we’re damned if these are the kind of wimps that are running and destroying our country.

Bullies are detestable and they can make your entire life a misery and there’s a fine line between good, strong leadership, which is required, and bullying, and a fair leader will achieve more from their staff than any bully would.

The Tories are just heartless people and have ruined everything in the United Kingdom, and now they continue without mercy and still can’t see anything wrong with their actions, and not so long ago, Priti Patel had 10 meetings, attempting to give money to finance a foreign power army on the Golan Heights, which was certainly a sackable offence and she quickly was.

She was supplying a foreign power and perhaps also breaking UK law. Most people would have got prison time for that! And it’s worse than that. She wanted to funnel away UK foreign aid to the Israel Defence Forces (IDF), and it was Israel controlled Syrian Golan Heights, a place that the United Kingdom doesn’t even acknowledge, and she visited IDF field hospitals nursing injured ISIS fighters, that’s the ISIS we were at war with.

Of course, there are different kinds of bullying, but those people who are needy and bully their staff with sackings and demotions if they don’t give 200 per cent of their time or are unable to work the weekend to get something done for their boss is a huge problem and disappointing, particularly when she thought she was suitable for the position, and would she happily fire someone and for them to lose their home and family over the most insignificant perceived lack of what she would call support?

But on saying that, Civil Servants do need a good shakeup from their comfy little numbers, but she’s totally out of her depth, with her shouty delivery and lashing out is her pitiful endeavour to look like she’s in charge, and she always has that grin on her face, perhaps the power has gone to her head?

I guess we should get used to that grin because I believe we’re going to be seeing a lot of it in the future.

Dominic Cummings Allegedly Playing God

0_Dominic-Cummings-arrives-in-Whitehall-ahead-of-cabinet-reshuffle-London-United-Kingdom-12-Feb-20.jpg

Boris Johnson’s top aide said Brexit could free up Britain to engineer questionable gene research, and Dominic has prophesied new techniques that will revolutionise IVF, allowing would-be parents to avoid embryos with disease risks and cognitive problems.

In a 4,000-word blog last February about genomic prediction, he asked Britain to push the boundaries of the field, despite what he said would be hysterical arguments about things like IQ and social mobility.

And he stated that post-Brexit will be outside the EU’s control and able to make speedier and more reliable judgments about regulating technology like genomics, AI and robotics.

But a Labour frontbencher insisted the practice was eugenics with one MP from the party accusing him of trying to play God and it gives a valuable insight into Dominic Cummings thinking on IQ and genetics after he wrote his blog post about a topic called genomic prediction.

This is where embryos are excluded from IVF based on markers in their DNA. This practice is welcomed by some as a way of circumventing lifelong illnesses but has prompted a moral debate about where to draw the line.

One US-based firm, Genomic Prediction, offers parents screening to identify genetically normal embryos. This includes weeding out those at risk of disease but in 2018 the firm further developed testing to determine the risk of an embryo of a low IQ.

Co-founder Stephen Hsu, who Dominic Cummings praised and has appeared with at No 10, said it would only be used to eliminate embryos with a mental disability, but Stephen Hsu believed people may in future select designer intelligent babies, and he said that some people are going to demand that, but if they don’t do it, some other company will.

On his blog, Dominic Cummings cited research saying genes have a substantial impact on people’s IQ and said genomic tests are getting more affordable all the time and can predict a person’s height within a few centimetres.

He concentrated largely on physical health, stating the useful predictions could avoid embryos developing diabetes, breast or prostate cancer in later life, but he added that they would also be able to make predictions about outliers in cognitive abilities, the high and low ends.

He warned against relying on early year’s programmes like Sure Start, which he stated was based on flawed evidence, to improve children’s lives, and instead, he asked politicians to make policy decisions on the foundation of rational thinking and good science.

He added that China was pushing hard on genomics but that America had political and regulatory hurdles holding it back on genomics that was much weaker there, and he continued that Britain couldn’t prevent the growth of such science.

However much Dominic Cummings attempts to dance around his beliefs, it’s obvious that this is eugenics.

Eugenics is a long-discredited and critical pseudo-science, and should it have a place in the 21st century, let alone be held by No 10?

This is disturbing and dangerous and maybe should have no place in society, never mind at the heart of government. Dominic Cummings might be able to play the Cabinet, but he can’t be allowed to impersonate God.

This is scary, and in another 10 or 20 years, they could by misfortune, or on purpose create another Hitler. However, even though we should be a little uncomfortable with genomics and playing God, I’m frequently reminded that countless lives have been saved due to scientific progress, but knowing where to draw the line is the test.

And what will be next? Only MPs and Dominic Cummings to breed to produce a British Master Race, or will it only be those who received a Public School education to have children? Boris Johnson will recommend that one!

Dominic Cummings is performing like an egotistical loony, and the simple-minded strike again, and this was something Mengele was working on in the Nazi concentration camps.

Most people with a low IQ or other so-called defects usually get a lot of pleasure out of life and they’re happy to be alive, although some are in pain and life can be miserable.

Nonetheless, where do you stop once on this course and what’s the logic behind it? Is it compassion? Or is it just a way to eliminate those who are considered to be a burden, a problem or a misuse of resources?

And whilst we should control our cynicism, some people are promoting what is a dangerous philosophy, and Dominic Cummings is a dangerous man, made all the more so by the seeming indifference to his works, of the current government leadership.

We should keep our eye’s and ears open so that we can see the abuses and atrocities that are being forced on ordinary people by those in leadership because sceptics we might be, but fools we’re not.

Dominic Cummings is ungodly and psychotic and Boris Johnson has given him free rein because Boris is slothful and he knows he’s incapable of governing the country and there are numerous legitimate reasons as to why we should regulate the practice of messing with nature.

I’m all for advancing medical science, but not at any cost and it would be just another scheme for pharmaceuticals to make even more money and would be open to exploitation by the rich.

Health and Disability Assessments

The purpose of the assessment is to understand how your illness or disability influences your everyday life. The assessment is carried out for the DWP.

The length of the DWP Health Assessment depends on the individual case, and it further depends upon the type of assessment and your medical conditions, although it says that you should allow two hours for the assessment but it may take less.

To be awarded Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) a claimant must total at least 15 points unless you’re in one of the categories of people who are exceptions, and the points can be added up from several different activities from both the physical and mental disabilities.

The conditions that automatically qualify you for disability are sense and speech problems, such as vision or hearing loss. Respiratory illness, such as COPD or asthma. Neurological disorders, such as multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy. Mental disorders, such as depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, autism or retardation.

Every month about 60,000 ill and disabled people have their needs assessed for benefits but some are so anxious about the method that is used, they’re using mobile phones to surreptitiously record those interviews, but using that evidence to reverse a decision is not straightforward.

And this is what you need to take with you when you attend one of these assessments:

You’ll need your appointment letter, which is quite straightforward because most people have to do that when they have appointments.

So, now comes the more complicated part. They want proof of identification. This is, of course, to catch you out. They want a driving licence, and then they would say that if you’re driving then you don’t need help, if you have a passport, why are you going on holiday if you’re so ill?

On another note, how many people have a passport or a driving licence? Or, if you don’t have those you have to bring three types of identification – that’s stressed you out even before you get there.

Now they want you to take evidence of all your medication, such as tablets, liquids and inhalers, and you have to take any medical aids that you use. By now, friends of mine would be loading up a lorry to get them there!

So, now you’ve gone from giving them information to essentially moving home with all your aids. They even want you to bring your mobility scooter, walker, walking stick, wheelchair to name a few and nebuliser. I’m sure I’ve missed a few out, but I’m sure you get the picture.

And for those that use a commode and a wet room, should they bring those as well?

There is no conceivable way these people who are ill could bring these things to the assessment centre because normally they’re not near to where they live, and another thing they say is that if you have an assistance dog, to bring that with you as well. Well, clearly if you’re blind and need an assistance dog you would have to bring it with, otherwise, dumb arse, how would they get there?

And these are the type of people who are doing our assessments, doesn’t give you much confidence, does it?

Boris Johnson Ally Lashes Out At Rapper

A top Boris Johnson ally has lashed out at Dave for calling the Prime Minister a real racist at the BRITs.

Home Secretary Priti Patel stated the claim was complete rubbish and maintained no one could level the allegation against the Tory leader before meeting him personally.

Rapper Dave used his performance to yield politically-charged lyrics and comment on the aftereffect of the Grenfell fire, which came days after a No 10 advisor said black Americans had a lower average IQ than white Americans and then resigned his appointment.

However, Priti Patel hit back at allegations the Prime Minister was guilty of racial discrimination and she said that Boris Johnson was not a racist at all and she thought the remarks were extremely improper.

And in an interview, she added the comments made by Dave were very much a generalisation and musicians and artists say all kinds of things. However, she didn’t see the BRITs performance but stated that she’s served with the Prime Minister and that she knows Boris Johnson well and that no way is he a racist.

It comes after the artist, who won Best Album gave a show-stopping performance demanding ‘Equality is a right’ as words such as ‘Black’ and ‘Go Home’ flashed up in the visuals.

The musician, whose full name is David Omoregie, is not the first to reprimand the Prime Minister from the BRITs platform. Stormzy used his performance two years ago to ask Theresa May ‘Where’s the money for Grenfell? What you thought we just forgot about Grenfell?

‘You criminals and you’ve got the cheek to call us savages, you should do some jail time, you should pay some damages, you should burn your house down and see if you can manage this.’

What Dave said about Boris Johnson resonated with people, especially following the incident where No 10 brought in a policy adviser who thought that black people were inferior intellectually to white people.

And Boris Johnson has a lot to do to satisfy the community that he’s not excessively adverse about black people and Muslim people, and in the meantime, Priti Patel made an eyebrow-raising claim as she supported Britain’s decision to deport drug offenders, many of which have lived in the United Kingdom for decades back to Jamaica.

Webp.net-resizeimage-18-1.jpg

She stated that there was no such thing as dabbling in drugs, despite her Cabinet colleague Michael Gove previously revealing he did just that with cocaine and Boris Johnson has also declined to answer clearly whether he took cocaine once as a teenager.

What do you folks think? Do you believe that Boris Johnson is a racist? I mean, look at the things he says about people who aren’t white.

Boris Johnson is a party leader of the media age and don’t overlook the fact that Boris was a journalist before he went into politics, so he knows what to say and not what to say to them.

And yet this current Prime Minister has displayed exceptional determination to limit media inspection, whether it’s banning ministers from appearing on the Today programme and Good Morning Britain, or banning them and their special advisers from talking to journalists, Boris Johnson is exposing himself to be a brooding and shady politician, forever at odds with his cheeky chappie persona.

I think we should presume that there’s a strong element of projection at play or is it because Boris Johnson was a partisan journalist that he’s an enemy of press freedom and that he believes all journalists are like him and that they’ll twist, warp and edit respectively.

You can see the same projection in the controlling of his co-workers. Just as a general who has taken control in a military coup keeps a close eye on his army to make sure no one else is considering using the same tactics against him, so Boris Johnson is determined his ministers can never dream of replicating his tricks.

Boris Johnson won power by exploiting his mastery of the media, which was so assured journalists referred to him as ‘Boris, the reader’s and viewer’s friend’, and naturally, he’s making sure Conservative ministers can’t do unto him as he did unto David Cameron and Theresa May, and it’s working for now.

And Boris Johnson has been so thriving at diminishing his co-workers, that if the Prime Minister’s time among us were to end tomorrow, who would have the stature and political footing to succeed him because there only appears to be room for one big beast in the Boris Johnson vivarium.

Mudslinging works both ways and it takes a more powerful person to build bridges and forge a better society for everyone, and it starts with every one of us in small ways and not taking what doesn’t belong to you.

It’s about creating a fair society, which Boris Johnson has no intention of doing, and Dave might be singing his song about Grenfell, which simply stokes resentment. But is he giving the money from his song to help the victims of Grenfell?

And we shouldn’t judge a man by the colour of his skin but by the content of his soul, and if man was to follow a few simple rules we would be living in a wonderful world.

Dave the rapper is okay, I’ve listened to him before, although I must say it’s not my thing and I’ve found that most rapping lyrics are about crime, discrimination, demeaning women and how bad off the black race is, and people buy this rap and listen to it and then get brainwashed, and it just seems he’s another guy with a chip on his shoulder using the race card to further his career, although we’re all entitled to free speech.

However, if it was a white person recording a song saying that blacks are racist, I’d probably end up in jail, and the state of the United Kingdom now horrifies me.

The problem is that we’ve raised a generation whose main way of feeling special is to openly call people bigots and radicals, and this is what you get.

A society of fools who believe they’re securing points by calling their Prime Minister and Presidents and Commanders in Chief racist and fascist, and then swaggering around as if they’re fearless protesters in the USSR or something, but are they wrong? And should we be giving Dave a platform to preach?

Yes, of course, he has a platform to preach, it’s called freedom of speech and why shouldn’t he when we have an entire cabinet who are brown-nosing each other and how pitiful they all look on TV and outside No 10, and most of the time I feel somewhat ashamed that there are people in this country cheering for this shambolic mess of no-hopers attempting to run the country.

And as for Priti Patel who doesn’t classify herself as a racist, for which a person of ethnic colour, she is, but then she would say she’s not a racist and she should be ashamed of herself because she’s clearly in bed with Boris Johnson.

It shouldn’t matter who you are or where you come from. What the colour of your skin is or what religious background you hail from, nobody should be subjected to racism of any kind because we’re all human beings and should be treated as such, and a true racist will go round calling everyone else a racist to cover their tracks because they accuse the other side of which they’re guilty.

But then most of us are guilty of having a tiny mind!

And we seem to be obsessed with colour and Priti Patel appears to be a person of dubious morals and ethics and yet she’s still our Home Secretary, and yes, we’re all a tad racist, but Boris Johnson seems to be well above the rest.

And when Priti Patel does finally crawl out of Boris Johnson’s backside, people might see that he’s a racist and a liar, but those that are Tories, the facts won’t mean anything to them.

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this: