Long Waits For Routine Treatment In The NHS

It was reported that follow up appointments are to be scrapped and patients moved around the country under extreme strategies to tackle the immense NHS waiting list overload.

The Health Secretary Sajid Javid is understood to have ordered NHS health chiefs to come up with suggestions to alleviate the backlog.

A review will recommend patients who’ve received treatment should have follow-up appointments cut, and alternatively only contact doctors if they encounter problems.

The Government is also said to be considering proposals to speed up non-urgent hospital care through hubs for routine surgery separating it from emergency care.

For those who face long waiting times, the option could also be given to travel further in order to get treated more promptly.

Clearing houses are also being examined for patients who have waited too long for treatment including routine surgery such as knee replacements.

Chris Hopson, the chief executive of NHS Providers, said it was more likely patients would be given appointments in nearby hospitals rather than being told to travel the 230 miles from Durham to Dunstable.

He added many currently come in for checkups every three months for up to a year after surgery, but that in most instances this wasn’t needed.

Chris Hopson said hospital chiefs had a moral responsibility to clear the backlog to ensure patients got the proper care and didn’t spend months on waiting lists.

Waiting lists for routine NHS care in England has snowballed since the start of the pandemic to 5.8 million.

Some 300,000 patients have had to wait more than a year for care, up from just 1,305 before the pandemic started, and 10,000 have waited two years.

Ambulance waiting times are also spiralling as Accident and Emergency beds are filled, leaving many waiting hours to offload severely sick patients.

Health chiefs have branded the ever-growing list unsustainable, while Labour has slammed the dangerously long waiting times for care.

Mr Hopson, who heads up a union representing hospital trusts, said NHS staff understand that the waiting list was not an adequate situation, and he told Times Radio that what they were working on was a really comprehensive strategy to get through those backlogs as quick as possible.

And he said that some of it will be all the traditional things that they do, which was to increase temporary capacity, to ensure that they use overtime as much as possible and to ensure that they use the capacity that sits in the independent sector.

The Government built the Nightingale Hospitals for COVID patients and if they’d used them like they were supposed to, then there wouldn’t have been this kind of overload, and then they decided to dismantle them discreetly.

Come to mention it, I’ve not seen the words ‘Nightingale Hospitals’ for a very long time, but then they probably built them, then realised that they didn’t have enough personnel, so not actually that well thought out, but that’s the Government all over.

But then we have boat people arriving on our shores, accessing our NHS, but if the Government withdrew their access the NHS would be a super service overnight.

And of course, it’s no problem for our Government, they can get a doctors appointment or bed in a private hospital with the click of a finger, but they’re just telling us now that they’re going to cancel appointments out and that everything is hunky-dory, and for those that paid into the tax system out of their hard-earned wages, well if they’re not going to get the service they paid for, then all that money needs refunding.

Circuit Breakers Are Imposed By Schools Themselves

Schools in England are beginning to close again as headteachers impose their own circuit breakers and are sending children home to study remotely in an attempt to tackle COVID before Christmas.

Campaigners have warned that more schools could follow suit this winter and shut down after St Mary’s Church of England Primary in Hereford and Darwen Aldridge Enterprise Studio in Lancashire declared they were closing for at least a week amid a surge in COVID cases.

Arabella Skinner of parent group UsForThem, which struggled to get children back into the classrooms after they were first ordered to close in March last year, told a newspaper outlet that as was the experience of last year proved, these isolated instances of school closures don’t stay isolated for long.

She said that the concern was that in the run-up to Christmas they will see more instances of this, but for how much longer are we going to ask our children to stay second class citizens?

St Mary’s Church of England Primary in Credenhill closed for a week yesterday, despite implementing a deep cleaning regime, increased handwashing and sanitising, compulsory PPE, separated year groups and staggered playtimes and lunches.

Headteacher Bernadette Davies wrote to parents to explain that the purpose of this break was to serve as a circuit breaker and stop the transmission of COVID 19 throughout the school.

Darwen Aldridge Enterprise Studio, a secondary school that teaches pupils aged 13 to 19, has also told parents that their children will be studying remotely until at least next Thursday in light of the number of cases and the information given.

Current guidance from the Department for Education states that schools may impose short term attendance restrictions in severe cases, and as a last option where all other risk mitigations have not broken chains of in school transmission.

However, the return to remote learning will mean that parents who can no longer WFH will either have to take time off, whether annual leave or unpaid or find friends, family or other childcare. The proposals have also sparked concerns that online education in the run-up to Christmas could be a precursor to tighter constraints at schools this winter, and even indefinite closures if there’s a return to national curbs including WFH, facemasks, or lockdown.

Christopher McGovern of the Campaign for Real Education told a newspaper outlet that the interests of children and parents were best served by keeping schools open, but sadly, some headteachers and union bosses were trying to put pressure on the government by closing schools, and that the children of the poor would suffer most of all.

Perhaps the headline should have read ‘Teachers find a way to get more time off’.

However, we have to bear in mind that there’s been a consistent criticism of teachers and also NHS frontline workers, which is having an impact and they appear to be leaving at a rate like never before.

But this pandemic has been going on for so long now that teachers, doctors and office workers have got used to this cushy way of working, mind you, our education system has become rotten, and now children aren’t learning that much.

It boils down to this, this has to end because schools shouldn’t be permitted to just close without permission from the Education Ministry. Otherwise, it will just be abused with schools closing a week early for Christmas and starting late in the New Year, and this relentless push to keep children out of education is screwing up their education and futures.

Before Christmas Shopping, Take The COVID Test

The Government has announced new guidance to take a lateral flow test before travelling to congested areas to avert a fourth wave this winter.

It’s the first time Britons have been asked to take a test before going to high-risk settings, which could include busy stores and town centres.

Before people in England were asked to take two tests a week or before meeting vulnerable people or after visiting a high-risk area, but not before.

According to a newspaper outlet, the new guidance also includes indoor settings such as sporting events and music performances.

The Cabinet Office guidance also warned being in busy indoor places carries a higher risk of catching or passing on COVID 19.

It states that you may want to take a rapid lateral flow test if it’s expected that there will be a period of high risk that day.

This includes spending time in packed and confined spaces, or before visiting people who are at higher risk of severe illness if they get COVID 19.

Ministers and scientists have said that the United Kingdom is protected from other ways of infections because of the high take-up of boosters.

The Delta variant also hit the United Kingdom before the rest of Europe, so there’s a higher rate of population immunity.

Experts say Plan B, which includes measures including compulsory face masks and working from home, will not be required.

Meanwhile, the booster jab is supposed to be ready for the under 40s inside weeks.

A Government spokesperson said that taking a free rapid lateral flow test would give peace of mind that you’re likely to be infectious and able to spread COVID 19, and the spokesperson said it remains essential to get vaccinated and continue to take other preventative steps such as frequent hand washing, wearing a face mask and keeping areas ventilated when meeting people indoors.

One in three people who are contaminated with COVID 19 don’t experience symptoms but a lateral flow test would allow them to avoid making others sick.

According to a poll, it comes as almost half of UK adults supported an indefinite lockdown for unvaccinated people.

About 45 per cent said they would want those without a COVID jab to have permanent constraints on their movements in the survey for Savanta ComRes.

Savanta ComRes polled 2,184 UK adults between 19 and 21 November.

This is a pandemic so deadly they have 24/7 advertising to remind us, but this expensive information gathering changes nothing, and we need to end this obsession with testing because it’s meaningless, and it’s just a global pass for money and control.

You really couldn’t make this up if you tried because our Government let everyone in from every disease-ridden land and then expect British people to take the test, but you can see how this is going to pan out because Christmas is coming, so take a test before you go shopping, then there will be an enormous explosion in cases because the figures will be misleading, then we’ll have more lockdowns, so predictable – next we’ll be stopped in the street and ordered to test, “Your papers please!”

Or it will be that when you pop along to your supermarket car park, the councils will have set up testing tents so that they can grab anyone gullible enough to get a test done then and there. All they did was pop out for some shopping, but no matter, “Let’s get you seated in the tent and you swabbed asap, forget the shopping for now”.

The Home Office Orders Councils To Care For Unaccompanied Migrant Children

Councils will be forced to take migrant children into their care systems as Kent gets overwhelmed following a record 4,000 making the perilous crossing this month.

Unaccompanied migrant children were previously moved around the UK based on a voluntary scheme to lessen the impact of migrants crossing the English Channel on Kent County Council.

But more than 200 councils could now be forced to take on migrant children unless they’ve got a good reason why not.

It comes as Home Secretary Priti Patel confirmed talks over possible joint British-French sea patrols in the Channel that would strive to stop and return migrants were ongoing.

Roger Gough, Tory leader of Kent county council which took 247 children this year, told BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme that it was the right thing to do, but Nick Forbes, Labour leader of Newcastle county council called the plan a blunt tool that wouldn’t suit every council.

Roger Gough added, 247 young people came into their care and they transferred 150 into other councils, and that they’ve had two occasions last year and earlier this year when they’ve indicated they can’t take young people because they weren’t able to offer safe and effective care at that time.

Nick Forbes, Labour leader of Newcastle county council, revealed the local authority has taken about 27 migrant children recently.

He added they originally agreed they’d take six, but took an additional ten, and they’ve taken 16 from Kent. In addition, they’ve had seven who arrived as adults but when assessed turned out to be children.

He said that they’ve taken 27 in the last year, and that they’re happy to do that, and that it was part of national responsibility, and that burden shouldn’t fall to some councils.

Nick Forbes said the problem with forcing children to take migrant children is that it’s a blunt tool.

He added that some councils have existing high levels of looked after children in their own areas. Some councils have real difficulties obtaining social workers, and he said that he thought what’s really happened is the reverse and that they’ve seen councils who’ve got several children in the system making offers to take more. It’s a matter of political preference.

He maintained there are 15 councils that have not taken on any migrant children, and that he wholly acknowledges the situation in Kent but it’s not fair to punish councils with a very large part. There are good reasons availability of foster care beds for example, and they want to assure a long term strategy.

The number of migrants crossing the Channel hit a record 4,019 this month, surpassing the previous high of 3,879 in September, with this year’s total now a record-breaking 23,761.

All this does really make you question who the Government serve these days because it’s certainly not the British people, but they’re quite willing to take in migrants when the British people can’t even see a doctor, dentist, and people are dying in ambulances because A&E is overcrowded, and there are countless British Nationals who are homeless, with many struggling to feed themselves or keep warm. Meanwhile, we get taxed to death, and beyond.

The mainstream political party’s don’t represent the British people or our values and culture, and they’re just trying to replace us with migrants who will work for less money, that’s until they see the writing on the wall and start challenging the Government for more, then what will happen with them?

However, services in Kent, particularly child services have been struggling for years due to illegal migration, whether by lorry or boat. This is just Government deception and incompetency and it’s not a new thing, but it is getting more serious.

Christmas Shoppers Are Urged To Be Vigilant

A senior Metropolitan Police officer has urged Londoners and visitors to the metropolis to be alert, not frightened in congested spaces in the lead up to Christmas.

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Specialist Operations Matt Twist urged people to be careful and look out for anything unusual, suspicious or concerning.

The warning comes after the UK’s terrorism threat was raised to severe, meaning an attack is highly likely after terrorists struck in Liverpool and Essex.

Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist described this year’s festivities as the first proper Christmas they’ve had in several years because of last year’s coronavirus restrictions.

He said there’s going to be loads of places that are busy and there are going to be lots of venues getting back on their feet, with loads of crowded places, and lots of gatherings, and that people should be alert, but not alarmed.

Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist also referred to the car crash at a Christmas parade in Wisconsin which killed at least five people as he stressed the importance of forward planning from authorities ahead of the busy time of year.

He told Nick Ferrari on LBC radio that this was about vigilance, and that there was a lot of work to be done in advance of gatherings and in advance of events in the United Kingdom.

He said that they’ve asked security officers to put in place things like vehicle mitigation or to put in place barriers, or to limit the risk to people.

He added that the incident in Wisconsin doesn’t appear to have been terror-related based on early media reports.

And he was asking the public to report anything unusual to the police in the build-up to Christmas, and he added that they want people to be vigilant, looking out for what’s unusual, looking out for things that may be suspicious, or may concern them.

He said that could be anything from a bag that’s in the wrong place, and he said that he believed that the public was already aware of that sort of thing, but also to stuff in their home or family lives, their friends becoming withdrawn or isolated, or making certain comments.

And he said that it was all about getting ahead of this and that if you report something, the message is, you’re not going to destroy someone’s life, but you might just save one.

Of course, there was a time not too long ago when we could just enjoy life, although we did have the IRA bombings and the likes of Peter Sutcliffe and Ian Brady, but even then we seemed to enjoy life more than we do now.

And it’s okay him saying that we have to be more alert but the anti-terror police only seem to turn up after the fact, to say that he or she was on the terror watch list.

There’s also a lot of mental illness about now and going untreated, but then look at the House of Commons, they’re by far the biggest group of mentally unhinged window lickers, and they’re far too busy making money so they can line their own pockets to even look after Joe Public, but this is Britain’s future now, thanks to consecutive government pandering.

It will be Christmas soon, which everyone is looking forward to, but how long will it be before we’re not allowed to say Christmas because it’s not politically correct, and without some people realising it because we’ve been so conditioned not to, the biggest threat to our society is from our very own Government.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Sister Rachel Says Tory MP Caroline Nokes Isn’t Playing The Game

Boris Johnson’s sister has claimed that Tory MP Caroline Nokes is not playing the game by alleging her father Stanley Johnson slapped her on the bottom nearly two decades ago.

Rachel Johnson questioned the value of the Romsey and Southampton North MP making the 2003 allegations in 2021, by asking: “What does it actually achieve?’

Speaking on her own podcast ‘Difficult Women’, the journalist and broadcaster said she did ‘not defend male aggressive sexual behaviour’, but the 56-year-old said she believed that making allegations as those made against her father by Caroline Nokes redounds against women in the end.

It comes after the Tory MP claimed Stanley Johnson forcefully smacked her on the backside and made a remark at the Conservative Party conference in Blackpool in 2003.

The allegations sparked claims by journalist Ailbhe Rea, who says she was groped by Stanley Johnson, 81, at a party conference in 2019. Stanley Johnson says he has no memory of either event.

Ms Nokes, 49, has been widely applauded for speaking out about Stanley Johnson’s alleged conduct, including by International Trade Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan who said women had for too long had to deal with casual sexism, the wandering hand.

But talking on her podcast about the accusations, Ms Johnson said that her father had been in a bit of bother because a female Tory MP didn’t play up and play the game because she revealed he slapped her bottom about 20 years ago.

She added that what troubled her was that she wasn’t sure what it would achieve and that she feared that it would encourage other women to come out and say things that have happened to them, but that she’s also heard men saying that women couldn’t be trusted and that they don’t know how they behave anymore.

She said that she wasn’t defending any kind of male aggressive sexual conduct but that she didn’t believe it redounds against women in the end.

Ms Johnson made the comments in the podcast while talking to former Weakest Link presenter Anne Robinson, who has previously rallied against modern-day feminism and the #MeToo movement.

Anne Robinson, who recently had Johnson stay with her and described him as her best guest, also gave her opinion on the accusations made by Ms Nokes.

So, not playing the game. Is Rachel Johnson attempting to change the rules of the game because it’s her father, and can anybody show or tell me when was the last time, if any, when any member of the Johnson clan was held up as paragons of virtue and morality?

They appear to be a very peculiar family indeed, with no morals and it’s self, self, self and self includes those closest, and maybe it was Stanley Johnson senior that wasn’t playing the game?

And it seems that Rachel Johnson saying that Ms Nokes isn’t playing the game is a code for women should put up and shut up. How extremely ignorant of her and it also gives a very negative message to women who are or were suffering from sexual harassment.

The rules are that you shouldn’t be going around touching anyone unless you’ve been invited to do so, anything else is assault.

And what game is that? The one where we let abusers off the hook if they’re rich and powerful enough because Rachel Johnson is saying that part out quite loudly.

Sweep Cleans Up At Auction

For decades Sweep played second fiddle to saintly Sooty and his magic wand.

But the mischief-maker will be squeaking with delight after his glove puppet made an extraordinary £3,000 at auction.

The price was more than treble the amount expected and £250 more than the figure reached for Sooty – Sooty sold for £1,500.

The original puppets were part of a collection of memorabilia from The Sooty Show which belong to Peter Jago, one of the main puppeteers, who died in 2016.

In total it made over £11,000 when it went under the hammer at Ewbank’s auctioneers in Surrey.

The show, which ran from the 1950s until the 90s was first presented by Sooty creator Harry Corbett.

The collection of items featured in the children’s puppet show blew estimated sale prices out of the water.

Sooty’s Little Cousin Scampi, a late edition to the format in the early 1990s, brought a price of £2,000.

Along with the original puppets, props and costumes from the show were also sold, including the white rabbit and magic box from Sooty’s conjuring routine, his famous water pistol and his magic wand.

The full collection sold for £11,250 including premium, three times expectations on November 18.

Ewbank’s specialist Alistair McCrea said that luckily Sooty and Sweep behaved themselves extremely well and managed to keep Little Cousin Scampi in check during the proceedings and that they were pleased with the response of bidders, and there was no doubt that this collection caused quite a stir.

It’s great to see them bringing in such good money because it was a fabulous show in the 70s and 80s, with Sweep always causing trouble, although I would have thought they would have gone for more, it seemed a tad cheap to me, they were icons, but then I suppose they’ll always be priceless to those who grew up with them.

It looks like anyone that had Sooty and Sweep puppets should have hung onto them, and I’m guessing that the name Sooty wouldn’t pass our woke world and in today’s stupid looney world.

And I’m sure they wouldn’t have been allowed now, and they would have been banned due to the excessive violence.

Of course, Sweep was the original bad boy – skip phonies like James Dean and Marlon Brando, Sweep was the original rebel.

The creation of the franchise traces back to 1948 when Corbett came across an all yellow bear glove puppet during a holiday in Blackpool. He bought the item and made use of it to entertain his children during that time, including his newborn son Peter, naming the puppet Teddy.

In that time, his use of the puppet to entertain children with a kind of comedic routines and magic tricks earned him a place on the BBC’s talent competition.

Izzy whizzy, let’s get busy – that certainly brings back some childhood memories. Mind you, we could do with some of that now because everyone needs a little fantasy while the world goes bonkers around us.

They were clean and funny without being crude or rude and certainly better than some of the children’s drivel we get on TV now, but I’m sure that someone having their hand up a puppet’s backside today would be banned.

But Sooty and Sweep were great, but this was when kids could be entertained with the simple things in life, and they might have just been puppets but puppet lives matter as well.

From Next Year, All New Buildings Must Be Equipped With Charging points For Electric Vehicles

New homes and buildings will be required to install electric

New homes and buildings will be required to install electric vehicle charging points from next year, Boris Johnson will confirm today.

In a speech to the Confederation of British Industry annual conference, the Prime Minister is set to announce legislation to drive an electric car revolution.

New build homes, supermarkets and workplaces will have to install charging points as standard by law, while properties undergoing significant improvements will also be forced to make the upgrades.

Boris Johnson is expected to say that they will require new homes and buildings to have EV charging points, with another 145,000 charging points to be installed thanks to these regulations.

He said that they were investing in new projects to turn wind power into hydrogen, and the ten-point plan investments have already triggered about £90 billion of private sector investment.

Downing Street branded the move as world-leading and the goal is that charging an electric vehicle will become as easy as filling up with fuel.

Boris Johnson will say that Labour will establish an Office for Value for Money, and just as they scrutinise the cost of their business, they will do the same on behalf of the taxpaying public.

The problem is that most people don’t want his green nonsense and certainly don’t want to be paying for it, but he just doesn’t get the hint even though it’s slapping him in the face like a wet fish.

The other problem is that our National Grid will have to keep up with all this electricity these charging points will be using, and I can see that it’s going to be a huge problem and people will be waking up in the morning with no electricity, so thanks to these fancy green cars, people will be living in the dark ages for a while, well, until it’s sorted out, and thereS probably won’t be any cheap overnight rates in the future because everyone will want to charge their toy cars and demand will probably increase overnight.

And let’s face it, realistically it’s far from green if you take into account its production.

And what about the majority of homes in the country like terraced houses with no driveways or flats that are twenty storeys high, they represent the vast majority of homes – I’d like to see them get charging points to those homes.

Although some charging points could be installed into the street lights, which would be great, but you’d have to have a lamp every fifty yards, and I can’t see people going out at 2 am to move their car once it’s charged so someone else can move their car to charge it.

So, what it looks like is that only the well-off will be able to use this method of driving green, everyone else will have to use public services or on your bike mate.

To be fair, I’m not sure how this is going to work when developers can’t even provide enough parking for residents, and for flats, all I can envision is fifteen floors with cables dangling from their windows with extension leads!

And how are they going to support the power grid?

Boris Johnson seems to be living in a dream world, but good luck to him when he wakes up in the morning and goes downstairs to put the kettle on – oh, I forgot Dilyn their dog does that because God forbid Boris should lift a finger.

There Were Pompoms And Shoes And Spilled Hot Chocolate Everywhere

Shocked witnesses described the terrifying moment a red SUV sped down the street flinging bodies in the air, nearly missing a young girl before killing multiple people during a Christmas parade outside Milwaukee on Sunday.

People at the scene described the frightening scene in Waukesha, Wisconsin as the vehicle barreled down the road along the parade route running over people as the crowd suddenly became frantic.

Paradegoers remembered a frenzied display of crumpled bodies, broken limbs and pieces of brains as numerous people were left dead or wounded in the streets.

In another heart-stopping moment, a video from the scene showed a young girl dressed in all pink dancing along to the music on the side of the street as the red SUV approaches at speed behind her. Thankfully the car missed her by inches as the crowd screamed.

Moments later, the car collided with the crowd, leaving five people dead and wounding 40, including numerous children who were rushed to six different hospitals in the area.

According to police, a person of interest is now in custody.

Waukesha Police Chief Dan Thompson told reporters that they had a person of interest that they were looking into and that the red SUV crashed into the crowd at 4.39 pm local time, 39 minutes after the parade started.

Braydon Kowalski, a 19-year-old Waukesha native, said that he was at the parade with his family when he saw bodies flying everywhere.

Braydon Kowalski said that the red SUV was blowing through people, just sort of dinging a lot of people, bodies flying everywhere, and that those people didn’t get run over they got thrown through the air and that loads of people got tossed up into the air.

He said that you could see bits of brains and that there were quite a few people with broken limbs, like lots of broken legs and people screaming with broken legs and that it was horrifying.

Melinda, a 36-year-old kindergarten teacher told a newspaper outlet that she was watching the parade from her apartment on West Main Street when she saw the red SUV speed through the crowd.

She said that she ran downstairs there were children on the ground and everyone was freaking out. Everyone was screaming and crying, it happened so fast, and that it was chaos, and that you don’t expect something like that to happen there. It’s Waukesha, it’s really safe.

Of course, they don’t know the motive of the person as of yet. What we do know is that this was shocking and our thoughts should go out to those families and a speedy recovery to the injured, and I feel that our world is falling apart and it’s so sad, but I will also be fascinated to see how the media spin this.

Conservative MPs Threaten Rebellion Over Boris Johnson’s Decision To Water Down The Cap On Social Care Costs

Boris Johnson is facing growing Tory resistance over his decision to water down a new cap on social care costs.

Conservative MPs are demanding the Government rethink a change to the Prime Minister’s social care plans which was slipped out last week.

Small print relating to the reforms means that means-tested support from local authorities for the less well off will no longer count towards the £86,000 cap.

That means they will have to spend more of their own money on care before they reach the lifetime limit.

Andrew Dilnot, the original social care tsar who made recommendations a decade ago on how to improve the sector, blasted the change and said it means the less well off won’t get any benefit from the cap.

A crunch vote on the matter is expected to be held in the House of Commons and the Prime Minister is under pressure to perform a U-turn.

However, Health Secretary Sajid Javid insisted that everyone would be better off under the new system.

It had been hoped that the imposition of a cap on lifetime care costs would spare countless pensioners the prospect of having to sell their homes to pay for residential care.

But the policy paper published by the Government last week revealed that it’s less likely to help those who currently get free support from the State under a means test because that contribution won’t be included in deciding when they’ve reached the cap.

So a poor pensioner getting state support would have to spend £86,000 of their own money on extra care before they were deemed to have hit the limit.

The Government said the move was needed to ensure people didn’t reach the cap at an artificially faster rate than what they contribute.

It said a new much more generous means test, which increases to £100,000 from £23,250 the amount elderly people can hold in assets before they have to pay for all their care themselves was the main means of supporting people with lower levels of assets.

But Andrew Dilnot told the Treasury Select Committee that 40 per cent of the elderly who have care needs will now get no benefit from the cap.

But does anyone believe a word this government says? Perhaps not, but a great number of people still believe what the media tell them.

It’s just another election promise broken, along with stopping illegal immigrants and the triple lock.

We know who will be better off, and I guarantee it won’t be Joe Public, and the next Prime Minister will have a lot of work to undo and the wrongs done by Boris Johnson and his Hannibal crew, and it’s just more lies from Boris and his followers.

And it looks like that in Boris Johnson’s eyes that migrants come first and are in front of the line with their extended families and six-bedroom houses.

When the NHS was first started it promised cradle to grave care and most of the elderly people had home helps who were provided free of charge to do the daily chores that allowed numerous people to continue to live in their own homes quite comfortably. Now, care costs are exorbitant and don’t leave people with any money to pass on to their children – bring back the good old days, please.

It’s just a case of the poor getting poorer and the rich getting richer.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started