Boris Johnson Refuses To Say If Meghan’s Coverage Is Racist

GettyImages-1188142955-714x476.jpg

Boris Johnson has declined to say if coverage of the Duchess of Sussex is racist as he was questioned on the Royal row gripping the United Kingdom but Boris was certain that they’re going to sort this out but declined to discuss it any further.

 

Rt_Hon_Priti_Patel_MP.jpg

Home Secretary Priti Patel dismissed there’d been racism in the media towards Megan, although she did say that she hadn’t actually listened to the debates, but she wasn’t in that category at all where she thought there’d been any racism.

Last year, more than 70 female MPs signed a letter denouncing antiquated, colonial undertones in coverage of the Duchess. Yet when asked if race was an issue, Boris Johnson stated that he was going to reiterate his point that he didn’t believe this has helped by continuing criticism from politicians.

_110497186_queen2reuters.jpg

The Queen reluctantly gave the couple her blessing to step back following talks with Prince Harry at Sandringham when he and Meghan announced they wanted to split their time between both sides of the Atlantic and took a swipe at incorrect reporting in the UK media.

But Boris Johnson’s views on this were pretty candid and he said that he was a huge fan of the Queen and of the Royal Family as they were an incredible asset for our country and that he was utterly confident that they were going to sort this out and that they were seemingly going to be able to sort it out easier without any critical commentary from him.

And when asked if the taxpayer-funded couple, who say they want financial independence, had a right to a private life, Boris Johnson said that he thought those perplexities were well understood.

PRINCE HARRY.png

The Queen held a summit at Sandringham with Prince Harry about his and Meghan Markle’s choice to step back as senior royals and the Queen said while she wished Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to remain senior royals, she would support their decision to become financially independent and move partly across the Atlantic.

But few details of how that independence from the UK taxpayer will happen and has not been revealed and the UK government has repeatedly declined to rule out continuing to finance the couple’s security.

MEGHAN.png

One thing that should be asked is should Harry and Meghan have the right to privacy which is publicly funded? But Boris Johnson is correct on this, it wouldn’t be helpful if politicians began commenting on what goes on with Harry and Meghan and the Royal Family, it’s their business and the Queen has already given her blessing, so we should just let them live their lives now.

The media needs to drop this petulant narrative about racism because if you put the term “House of Windsor” into Google, the first inquiry would be “Is the Queen of England German?” Well, the Queen is British, although she is part German, and the House of Windsor is really the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, but they changed their surname a long time ago.

And when British citizens were being killed by Germans, a royal family with a foreign surname was a problem. So, yes, the Queen is partly German, so what, and she belongs to a family that recognised a century ago that names matter less than behaviour and the same goes for Meghan because it shouldn’t matter that she’s of mixed race, it should matter that she’s a human being like everyone else and therefore, should be treated as such.

But it’s much easier to condemn other people’s biases than their own weaknesses, particularly when we live in a society that overindulges this kind of thing and the word racism has lost all meaning now and it’s the most overused and abused word in the English language.

Now we should just move on with the news because Harry and Meghan are yesterday’s news and let’s hope it stays that way when there’s more urgent and important news to be getting on with.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clive Lewis Drops Out Of Labour Leadership Race

methode_times_prod_web_bin_f8a731ea-22ad-11ea-bf0a-65463b7bd0d0.jpg

Clive Lewis has dropped out of the Labour leadership contest after failing to obtain enough nominations to get onto the ballot paper and with merely hours to go before the deadline, the shadow business minister had convinced just five MPs to formally support him to succeed Jeremy Corbyn.

And it was obvious that he wouldn’t get on the ballot, so he announced that he was standing down in the spirit of pluralism, diversity and generosity that he’s promoted during his campaign, although he did in the morning say that he had confidence in his colleagues to put him through to the next round of the contest, despite him touching on complex problems throughout his leadership delivery.

He stated that he realised that it was difficult because he’d been addressing things which have been difficult for people to hear and that it wasn’t about triangulating policies, it was about stating that you’ve got a political system that’s stacked against you and that it was like playing by the rules with both hands tied behind your back and that we needed to change the rules – well, he’s not going to be doing that anytime soon!

And even though Clive Lewis hasn’t shied away from his controversial stand, portraying himself as a republican and calling for a vote on the future of the monarchy which seemingly didn’t get him many brownie points but then people don’t like the truth and those that are loyal to the Royal Family weren’t going to give him any points at all.

Clive Lewis further said the drive to take Britain out of the EU had prejudice at its heart and that politicians like Nigel Farage had used Brexit to divide our communities but ultimately our country has decided to listen to Boris Johnson, someone who’s got a track record of discriminatory discourse.

DUCHESS OF SUSSEX.png

He also suggested that the Duchess of Sussex had been the victim of structural racism in the media and he suggested his race had played a part in his fight to get enough nominations from his parliamentary colleagues to get on the ballot paper but had he thought that he just wasn’t good enough? On the other hand, he could have been browbeaten out of the race because he was a person of colour but we’ll never truly know for sure.

Sadly bigotry is tossed about all over and it’s pretty overused so now nobody actually takes it seriously and he did appear to blame everything on racism and the monarch and literally, that was his entire stand and now, of course, he’ll be screaming racism and according to this man everyone is racist and he talks about others dividing the country but this is a chip on his shoulder which is a kind of anti-white racism, which certainly didn’t help him.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

People Die Waiting For Reforms To Benefit Rules For Terminally Ill

p06qlc0j.jpg

About 1,700 people have died waiting for improvements to cruel benefit rules and it marks six months since welfare chief Amber Rudd announced a revision of the Special Rules for Terminal Illness, yet it’s still continuing and Amber Rudd has since quit her position.

Now Marie Curie and the Motor Neurone Disease Association say that 1,700 people have died waiting for a decision on Personal Independence Payments (PIP) since the changes were promised in July.

The estimation is based on the previous Department for Work and Pension figures which show 17,070 people died waiting for a PIP decision in five years and people currently have a benefit claim fast-tracked if a GP agrees they’re expected to die inside six months but charities say the rule is arbitrary, unworkable and uncaring, with people being forced to demonstrate that they have six months left to live or suffer long delays in getting access to benefits and when they do get benefits they can still face stressful reassessment, even though they’re dying.

The review gave people some certainty at least but six months on these people are no further forward and people are still dying without any monetary help they need and are entitled to and we need the Government to act on its promise.

Amber Rudd announced the review two months before she quit the DWP, highlighting the grief of losing ex-husband AA Gill to cancer but at the time the Mirror understood the review had no end date, no set terms of reference and no separate budget, although the DWP maintained it had now made positive moves, including a dedicated web page and would be carrying out more research with claimants over the coming months and that the evaluation of support for people nearing the end of life was an undeniable priority for them.

They further stated that important work was well underway and that they were working closely with medical professionals and charities like the MND Association and Marie Curie and that they were making assertive changes and actively collecting all the pertinent medical evidence required to shape the proposals.

JO LYNTON.png

Jo Lynton, 60, was able to get PIP for her dying husband Mark quickly after getting the six-month form but she’s warned that others can’t get the magic piece of paper, adding that the six-month rule definitely has to end because it’s wrong and unfair.

Jo Lynton said when they applied for Universal Credit she and her husband Mark ran into obstacles, trying for 15 weeks before they became ineligible when Mark cashed in his pension and Mark who was an IT consultant from Bromsgrove died at the age of 54 from MND in July after a 22-week illness.

Jo, his wife was his full-time carer and she said that claiming benefits was horrible and when on the telephone to them they were put on hold for at least 50-60 minutes but she couldn’t be on hold for that amount of time because her husband could choke on his own saliva. What was she supposed to do, tell him to choke quietly while she was waiting on the telephone to get £50 a week?

Mark was diagnosed on February 27 four days after his last day of work and was unable to drive inside a week and his wife Jo would just sit there and cry because there wasn’t anything she could do and she said they paid into the system and the one time they needed relief they couldn’t get it.

They still had a mortgage and all the bills to pay and it was hard but they were lucky, they had a little bit of savings but other people have nothing and all DWP said was that it awarded the full rate of PIP to Mr Lynton two days after receiving notice he was terminally ill.

However, there was a UN report released in 2018 that said that the UK Government enacted systematic violations of the rights of people with disabilities due to their welfare reforms by the coalition government of the Tory Party and the Liberal Democrats, that was part of their wider agenda of austerity.

These included cuts to disability benefits and social care budgets and the bedroom tax, all aspects of the welfare state that support people with disabilities live independent lives and as a consequence of these reforms, the report discovered that the threshold of grave or systematic violations of the rights of persons with disabilities had been met in the State Party.

The government’s reply by the Work and Pensions Secretary repudiated the report’s conclusions, stating at the heart of the report lies an antiquated view of disability which is condescending and insulting and that they strongly refuted its conclusions.

Complete rejection by a ruthless Tory government where 130,000 deaths which are connected to their austerity policies and still the killing goes on and things will get much worse as Universal Credit is designed to get people back into work but I’m just wondering how they’ll get people with disabilities and Mental Health back into work by 2027 because by then half the people might have died because of the system.

And this Tory government haven’t finished with their contempt of the sick and disabled because this government just does whatever it wants with our sick and disabled and they don’t care what anyone else says about it and it’s beyond offensive and quite honestly it’s disgusting.

But this has always gone on, nothing has changed, they’ve just given it a different name, and it’s just another example of our bureaucratic computer says no to a society where the identity of the patient has no place and we need to create a system where they treat the sick and disabled like real people in need and the people who work for the DWP need to make more humane decisions and if they don’t it won’t make much difference what the benefit is called, this indifference will go on and on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clive Lewis Calls For Referendum On Royal Family

Official_portrait_of_Clive_Lewis_crop_2.jpg

Clive Lewis has called for a poll on the fate of the Monarchy as part of his pitch to be the leader of the Labour Party. He further declared that one of the reasons why he has so far struggled to get on the ballot paper is because he’s a black man.

prince-harry-meghan-markle-1.jpg

He told an audience in Brixton that the decision by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to step back from public life could be a model for the fate of the Royal Family and he stated that he admired the couple’s decision following press interference they’ve encountered and the prejudice that Megan has encountered in the British media.

royal_family.jpg

So, why not have a vote in this country on the future of the Royal family? The people should be allowed to decide on what the fate of the monarchy is, and for the Royal Family being sized down and I’m sure that a bunch of people would like to see the monarchy scaled-down and there’s been a lot of talks because the monarchy is quite extensive and there are a lot of people in the Royal Family being funded by the public purse.

We’re a democracy and the people of this nation need to be seen as citizens rather than subjects in the 21st Century and we should be speaking about what a modern state looks like and what the function of the Royal Family would look like.

Let the British people determine what the fate of the monarchy is and what shape it should take. After all, we’re not subjects, we’re citizens of this country and I would imagine the vast preponderance of the people in this country would consider themselves citizens.

Jeremy_Corbyn_election_infobox_2.jpg

Yet this could not end well for Clive Lewis because Jeremy Corbyn also wanted to get rid of the Royal Family, and that didn’t end well for him either and he’s picking the wrong fight because he needs to win power before making such sweeping moves and he further stated that the reason no one voted for him as leader is because he’s a person of colour but now he’s another person that believes he’s Jeremy Corbyn, an expert protestor who complains about anything that the competition is working on.

And after the last debacle, it’s questionable we’ll ever see another referendum anytime soon and in recent polls, it suggested that 64 per cent of the people still support the monarchy. There are truly more important problems in our country and it’s doubtful his thinking would be embraced.

But there are people out there that would like to get rid of the ruling elite family, after all, they’re no better than us and they freeload money from us and treat us with discourtesy and disdain, and they’re malicious users of all good and decent people and numerous people might say that we should have a vote because the Royal Family get more money than anyone on Universal Credit.

methode_times_prod_web_bin_0e948710-596e-11e8-9e86-99299e0f1a1c.jpg

And as a regimental band moves towards Windsor Castle, rounded a corner by a sculpture of Queen Victoria and entered the 11th-century fortress through the Henry VIII gate for thrice-weekly changing of the guard, pipers and drummers clad in kilts and bearskins lead the way, followed by the New Guard carrying bayonets over their left shoulder.

It’s a quintessential British display, cheered by sightseers lining their route but a few metres from the castle walls at least 10 rough sleepers huddle in doorways and bus shelters, covered in wet blankets and sleeping bags and one man in his 40s who lives on the streets, was rolling his first cigarette of the day.

He’s one of the increasing number of people living on the streets in the royal town of Windsor where police have been called to circulate enforcement orders against the scourge of rough sleepers and homelessness before the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle because it was thought that it was presenting a beautiful town in a sadly bad light.

But for this man who lost his private tenancy, lives in a makeshift shelter of cardboard and blankets by a bus stop opposite the castle, these enforcement orders were a stark difference to the charity and kindness countless people in the town have shown him and other rough sleepers.

And if they want to clean up the royal borough, at least give these people a place to stay but of course, they don’t want vermin like this man on the street when the entire world is watching but at the end of the day, they’re human beings as well and just want to get back on their feet.

Only the Labour party can suggest ideas that make them unelectable with divided offensive strategies, more involved in doctrines than winning elections and at this rate they’ll never become a powerful opponent or win an election and it’s not about the colour of his skin that’s holding Clive Lewis back, it’s his hypocritical foolishness.

And Clive Lewis needs to understand that we’re citizens of this country, not serfs and if he’s fighting to get on the ballot paper because of the colour of his skin then he’s acknowledging the Labour Party is institutionally racist and why would he want to remain in, nevermind want to lead such a party?

He’s just looking for a pity vote, how pathetic, and I’m surprised they haven’t begun calling for a Queen of colour in the name of diversity.

2701203040_5212928a84_b.jpg

The monarchy and the House of Lords are really antiquated and they all need to be modernised because we live in the 21st Century and we live in a modern age where things are shifting quite quickly.

The Royals are not what makes up this country, the people who live in it are but instead, we just get treated like peasants and commoners but then its been like this for a pretty long time where social institutions comparable to serfdom occurred in the ancient world.

Serfdom was a system that provided most of the agricultural labour throughout the Middle Ages and slavery continued right through to the Middle Ages but it did diminish, mostly confined to the use of household slaves but actually, it’s always been there and still is.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sliding Standards

newspaper.jpg

The media bully, deceive, trick, browbeat and smear, we all know this, yet it’s now become normal and the preponderance of people in our society accept this, but in turn, this will eventually shape our children’s lives.

This is how standards slide and nobody holds the media to account, it’s no surprise people are turning on each other, yet they still listen to the media rubbish and what an utter disgrace of a nation we’ve become with no standards.

But then we should stop watching and listening to the news and quit reading newspapers and we should be shaping our children, not anyone else and the only people who can sort this are the parents of this world because we’re allowing the pied piper of commercialism to take our children and distort their minds.

Sadly, we now live in a destructive world, which is getting more dangerous by the day and it’s terrifying what our children and their children are heading into and this media ethos is to never let the truth get in the way of a great story.

Of course, every person has a brain and thinking ability and a choice, and time to think things over, but some people are too lazy to bother and it’s far easier to follow the crowd and baa along with the rest and it’s no good getting older if we don’t get wiser.

Parents should have the right to know what their children are doing at school, but they usually don’t and parents should be permitted access to their children’s personal information but the government will say that a child has a right to their alleged right to privacy.

And the government at all levels has become entangled in the private lives of families, dictating child-rearing measures and punishing parents who don’t obey the rules.

This is the condition of an oppressive state and interference in the lives of families which is pervasive and decisions have been taken out of the hands of parents only to be determined by politicians, school administrators and unelected functionaries which at first appeared seemingly harmless, yet now, children are being separated from their parents care because they’re overweight.

Now the government and the media tell women what to do with their bodies, while other agencies are making life less palatable by regulating the diets of schoolchildren.

parenting.0.0.jpg

This isn’t just a matter of parenting best practices but the failure to adhere to a bubble-wrapped vision of child-rearing which a parent can then end up being charge and maybe end up on the child-abuse registry.

And it appears that we have lost our civil rights and even the right to remain a parent to a child and it seems that parents have to come to accept all the rules and specific instructions about how to cut up fruits and vegetables sent from home and the ban on plastic bags being brought into schools.

Next, it won’t be safe for your children to go out onto the ice because it’s far more dangerous than staying indoors and this is the sort of thing that government nannies are seeking to prevent because everything is in the interest of your offspring and soon when you make your child’s lunch there will be government-empowered food inspectors at your child’s school looking into their lunchbox, or it might be that schools ban home-packed lunches completely because they think that their menus are more nutritious than what parents choose to prepare themselves.

Who gets to decide what’s in the best interest of children is murky water when it comes to schools in general and in numerous cases, a child’s weight and height information is collected along with each child’s body-mass index, usually without the consent of the parents.

But while pupils are in school the school can collect such basic health information without restraint and in the most heartbreaking of instances agencies seem to be able to determine what’s in the best interest of one’s child and in some instances children have been separated from their parents for being insanely overweight.

And agencies have supported these removals by stating it’s in the best interest of the child and that the state can take charge of their lives and they will say it’s for the well-being of the child but sometimes it can do more harm.

The problem is we are inappropriately defining private and public life and yet we are advocating breaking apart families that will cause no harm to anyone but the victims and we should be concentrating on restoring the rights of the parents to raise their children.

And as common-place as nanny-state parenting has become, it will take a huge struggle to reverse the tide of public policy and the overprotective culture that has brought us to our current situation but then being a good parent, and a good citizen has never been straightforward.

But if you want to make a difference, you have to get out amongst Joe Public, discuss and debate without confrontation because people need to come together and make a stand, the sooner the better before it’s too late.

We need to quit buying these so-called newspapers and to switch from the BBC and to find alternative ways to find out what is going on.

social-media-image-.jpg

We whine perpetually on social media, meanwhile, our country is being stolen from us and being transformed forever and we have to take a stand against the madness and end the progress of the swamp people that some people so clearly admire.

We have turned on the poorest and most defenceless and demonised them and the gutter press and this cruel government need to be held to account and we should fear for our children’s future that’s enveloped by fanatics and people who believe the excrement they read, however, it will take decades to undo the damage caused.

Asthmatic Student Passes Away

mathr.jpg

Schools must protect our children but tragically a school failed in its duty, with devasting consequences.

Ryan Gibbons was a lively child who should still be alive but due to the inept leadership at his school, he’s no longer with us.

Ryan Gibbons was active and enjoyed being outdoors but there was one thing always reining in his energy, the child had asthma.

Most people know that asthma is a treatable condition and Ryan Gibbons should have been able to prevent his asthma attacks from having any dangerous consequences upon him but the school had a lousy system that stopped him from using it.

It all began when Ryan Gibbons and his friends were playing soccer and the asthma attack hit the boy and he urgently required his inhaler but didn’t have it because a school administrator had confiscated it and locked it away earlier that day.

His friends lifted him and hurried him to the office where the inhaler was being stored but the administrator was not at the office and they couldn’t get inside and by the time they found anyone who could get into the office Ryan Gibbons was dead.

If the school hadn’t had this pointless policy of impounding Ryan Gibbon’s inhalers, then the child would not have died, yet Ryan Gibbons and his family had previously tried telling the management of his school that they shouldn’t take away his inhalers.

The school didn’t listen and they cared more about establishing a pointless school rule than protecting one of their pupils and after the family realised that the school would keep on taking away the child’s inhalers, they’d gone to extreme measures of making their son plant them on his person but the school administrators would frequently find them and take them away.

The school’s policy was that all prescribed medication needed to be kept in an office but obviously, none of the school staff members was bright enough to understand that this policy could threaten a child’s life.

This inhaler that Ryan used was a device that he required all the time because when an attacked happened it opened up his airways and enabled him to breathe again and by not being able to have access to his inhaler Ryan passed out and never woke up again.

This event took place at the Elgin Country School located in Ontario, Canada and an investigation was done that revealed that in spite of various attempts, Ryan was not permitted to keep his inhaler on him, this was even with a note from his doctor.

Ryan’s mother recalls that the school called her numerous times asking her to come to pick up his inhaler that Ryan had brought to school and since Ryan’s death, his mother has decided to do whatever it takes to stop this from happening to another family.

It’s vital for each child that has asthma to have immediate access to their inhalers while at school and in America, at the time of Ryan’s death, there were laws that enabled pupils to carry their inhalers on hand, yet numerous children were still being denied as the inhalers were still being labelled as a prescription medication and they’re forced to leave it in the office.

More than 10 Americans die every day due to complications from asthma, even though death rates have diminished, they’re not absent and deaths are potentially preventable.

Nevertheless, since the story was published in 2012, a new law has been passed called Ryan’s Law which now requires all school boards in the province of Ontario to develop and maintain asthma policies that better protect students with asthma.

 

New Style ESA Explained

We’re now amid the biggest welfare reform in a generation as claimants are transferred onto Universal Credit from six existing benefits and amongst the legacy benefits it will take over from its income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA).

However it is possible to get ESA as well as Universal Credit, so how precisely does this work? And what are the rules for eligibility and the payment rates?

ESA is given to those who have an incapacity or health condition that influences how much they work.

There are two types, contributory ESA, which has been renamed new style ESA, or income-related ESA.

Income-related ESA is being replaced by Universal Credit.

New style ESA is not means-tested but is taxable, whereas income-related ESA is means-tested, so it takes into account income and savings but it’s not taxable.

The new style ESA can be claimed on its own or at the same time as Universal Credit and you’ll be able to get Universal Credit as well if you and your partner don’t have savings of more than £16,000.

Sounds great doesn’t it but the new style ESA will be classed as an income when determining how much Universal Credit you’re qualified to get, so if you’re paid the new style ESA it will reduce your Universal Credit payment by the same amount, bit pointless actually, it’s almost like robbing Peter to pay Paul but I’m sure it looks good on paper but not when it’s coming out of your pocket.

Tories Trying To Keep Universal Credit Claimants In The Dark

boris-johnson-pm-web_0.jpg

The SNP has accused the UK Tory government of attempting to prevent MSPs from supporting Universal Credit claimants through the appeals process and SNP MSP Linda Fabiani has hit out at new changes imposed by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) that requires claimants to sign a waiver form explaining why they have approached a politician for assistance, rather than going straight to the Job Centre.

The new changes further require claimants to say precisely what they’ve discussed with their chosen representative before information can be disclosed concerning an appeal.

Previous figures have revealed that 55 per cent of people who were denied Universal Credit support by the DWP had their decisions overturned in court but the Tories are making it hard for constituents to approach their MSPs for help and making MSPs leap through hoops to support their constituents and it’s a disgrace and an affront to devolution.

The Universal Credit system is fundamentally flawed and needs to be halted and with so many loopholes and restrictions put in place to stop claimants getting the help they’re entitled to, it’s no surprise people come to their MSP for help.

Neither the DWP nor Boris Johnson’s Tory government has the right to prevent people from approaching their chosen delegates for advice and assistance but this is just the latest extension of the antagonistic environment introduced by this right-wing Tory government created to lock people out from getting the financial assistance they’re entitled to.

And the Tories are striving hard to turn benefits claimants into an underclass and Universal Credit claimants are routinely kept in the dark about how much they should get, how their awards are determined and if and how they can challenge DWP decisions because the Department’s interactions with claimants are obscure and inadequate.

Because Universal Credit has rolled six different old benefits into one and now claimants can’t tell which component is for what, so they don’t know if what they’re getting is correct.

And the information provided by the DWP about how a person’s money is awarded and has been worked out is often inadequate and payments may be incorrect, yet they go unchallenged and as a result, numerous claimant risk sliding into debt.

It’s a fundamental principle in a democracy that governmental bodies must have grounds for their decisions. It’s equally fundamental, or should be, that they should be able to explain what those reasons are.

And if the information doesn’t stack up, then, again on first principles, the decision should be open to review or appeal. But, the Department for Work and Pensions is frequently falling on every element of Universal Credit and people in need are left to guess at and grope for things which should be explicit and tangible.

The results are that the government feed into the fear and despair that so many people managing on low incomes experience, which in turn can affect family life for children growing up in these situations.

Universal Credit helpline staff are usually unable to explain how a claimant’s award has been worked out because they don’t have access to payment calculations which in the vast preponderance of cases are processed automatically on the Univeral Credit’s digital system.

And a claimant’s online monthly payment statements only gives basic information on how their award has been determined, so spotting mistakes, such as the omission of allowances for children, can be challenging or difficult for claimants.

And housing costs, payment statements don’t give an explanation when there’s a disparity between the amount of rent allowed for in a Universal Credit calculation and the amount of rent due and usually the discrepancy is because payment for rent within Universal Credit is capped by Local Housing Allowances or by the bedroom tax, but their payment statements leave claimants none the wiser.

More information should be given in claimant’s statements including a full breakdown of how awards have been calculated and a nil entry for allowances claimants are deemed ineligible for so that mistakes can more readily be recognised.

And the online Universal Credit account, by which claimants manage their claim and interact with their Universal Credit advisers should be redesigned so that all decisions about a claimant’s awards are identified as formal decisions, and as such can be challenged and stored in one place so that they’re accessible.

Currently, DWP decisions are strewed in various parts of the claimant’s online account and claimants have to trawl through old journal entries to locate them.

It further shows that the DWPs written information on claimant’s appeal rights falls short of legal requirements because it suggests a first stage reconsideration of a benefits decision, known as a Mandatory Reconsideration is only likely where there’s new information pertinent to a claim or where a claimant believes the Department has missed something.

Disagreeing with a benefit decision is adequate grounds for requesting a Mandatory Reconsideration and the Department’s standard-issue information further fails to tell claimants that there are time limits for requesting a reconsideration which is also unlawful.

Claimants experiences discovered that approximately a quarter of Universal Credit claimants 23 per cent felt that the decision about their claim either hadn’t been explained at all, or hadn’t been explained clearly, and 16 per cent of Universal Claimants stated that they’d been given wrong or conflicting information by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) about their claim.

And a study of Universal Credit claimants discovered that over 40 per cent of claimants got a different award than they were anticipating, and over 30 per cent of claimants disagreed with the statement.

Transparency should be at the core of a fair social security system but Universal Credit claimants don’t always understand the amounts they’re getting so it’s more difficult for them to pick up on errors or to foretell how their awards might change.

This is all the more troubling as the amount of Universal Credit claims is set to increase and the scope for mistakes, imperfections and flaws are vast and because Universal Credit is an all in one benefit, with all the eggs in one basket, when things go wrong for claimants the financial fallout can be terrible.

But there are effective, inexpensive changes the DWP can make to clear the befuddlement.

The Department must improve the information it gives so that Universal Credit claimants aren’t fumbling in the dark about their award.

Clear and accessible information on how decisions are made and a person’s right to appeal is the bare minimum we should expect from a modern benefit.

    

 

 

   

 

Tory Propaganda War

3ed46d6d-2b5a-435f-8bf5-08c67a212413-state-pension-being-calculated-shutterstock.jpg

The state pension age is increasing unwaveringly, month by month, following continuous efforts to stop the changes. This means hundreds of thousands of people at a time are being made to wait longer for the pensions that their elders received earlier in life but Britain’s expanding economy will be powered to new heights by over-65’s who want to carry on working because if we don’t then we’re segregating against those who still have much to contribute with 282,000 expected to take up employment who are over 65 which will be essential to British economic performance in the years to come.

But should we be encouraging this propaganda which will force people into work and is this acceptable when they should be drawing their pensions? Yet the Tories have boosted the retirement age without anyone’s approval.

And it’s true, some people who are past retirement age do still want to work and that’s their decision, but that’s not what’s happening here. Now the Government are making people of retirement age work whether they want to or not.

And this is low, sick and wicked because it attempts to put a shine on cruelty but of course, 14 million people voted for it and pulled us all into the Tory bog with them and we should expect much more of this in the future and for some their pension won’t even allow them to pay their rent because it just won’t cover it.

And it’s not even the Governments money, it’s people’s collected taxes that they’ve paid in for their pension which is legally theirs, not the Governments but the Tories never believed in a public provision pension, just like they don’t believe in the concept of a National Health service.

Although they can’t get away with abolishing the State Pension just yet, so what better way to abolish it by underhandedness by extending the age at which it’s drawn?

And for numerous people, they believed that when they retired they could collect their pension, yet now we can unearth some dark truths about the financing of later life with so few people saving enough for their twilight years, and retirement is in jeopardy of becoming a thing of the past.

And although this is good news for older workers who aren’t ready to retire quite yet, indeed Britain’s workforce is greying almost before our eyes and in the last 15 years, the amount of working people aged 50 to 64 has risen by 60 per cent to 8 million, far greater than the rise in the population over 50 and the proportion of people aged 70-74 in employment meanwhile, has virtually multiplied in the past 10 years.

Of course, this trend will continue and now one-third of the workforce is over 50 and in a generation, the current State Pension age will be a distant memory and it’s prophesied that those joining the workforce today, will be in their mid-70s to early 80s before being able to draw their State Pension.

But despite proof that workforces will have to embrace older workers, government statistics reveal that up to a million older workers have been forced out of work prematurely because of age discrimination, caring duties or health problems.

And a great number of older people are becoming jobless rather than gaining work, and nearly 40 per cent of Employment and Support Allowance claimants are over 50, which is evidence that many older people are unable to easily find new and sustainable work.

And some people don’t want to work until they drop because they believe that they’ve worked long enough and it’s not just the physical job that wears out the body, it’s just being exhausted from the slog and people want to quit work when they’re fit and healthy so that they can pursue their interests while they’re still fit and healthy enough to pursue their interests beyond work. That’s not much to ask, is it?

There’s a distinction between wanting to work past a certain age and working because you have to. What do you think? Do you truly want to work until you drop and also come up against age discrimination?

Retiring early is excellent if you have the money to finance a generous retirement and you have some plan to occupy yourself during that retirement and some do but there are others out there that don’t believe it’s a great way of life and for some, it’s a dismal anti-climax and a good number of people from all walks of life go onto miss work dreadfully, that’s why there are numerous retired people who like to work in charity shops voluntarily say 2-3 times a week, but that’s not slogging, that’s something they enjoy doing and they also know that they can leave at anytime they like if it’s getting too much for them.

I can understand the reason behind them working because they’re not only enjoying what they’re doing and giving something back to society without losing their pension and if the Government had proposed something like this then we could say that they were looking after that person’s interests by letting them work voluntarily without losing their pension and by keeping their mind alert.

But now the Government wants you to work until you drop. Well, that makes complete sense if your a politician, then they don’t have to pay you any pension because you’ll be dead and they’ll be saving money that they can put into their pockets – oh, where’s Robin Hood when you need him!

ll-mind-charity-shop-headingley-jan-18-credit-js-6-800x450.jpg

There’s a difference between a day a week in a charity shop and full-on shop work at minimum pay, probably on a shift or zero-hours contract and if the Government believe it’s a great idea, how come the wealthy don’t do it because what’s good for one is also good for another?

The reason why is because we’ve been enslaved and we paid for State Pension as a safety net but people paid into that so that they could have that safety net, yet the Government are now stealing our money, the money that we worked hard for but eventually the time will come when State Pensions will become means-tested or the Government will just do away with it altogether.

Age discrimination normally kicks in when a person is in their 40s or 50s with many being made redundant in their 40s, attending various interviews, never being offered the job with the interviewer saying that the person has too much experience, yet that information was already on their CV and application form, which seems like blatant age discrimination.

And retiring also gives jobs to the younger generation, otherwise, the retired would be stealing their jobs but then robots will probably take over soon and will be doing most of the jobs we do well before we’re due to retire, so there will be no use for us, humans, in the future or maybe I should replace that word with automated because once account ledgers were handwritten and we had manual typewriters, then electronic and now computers et cetera.

Engineers now use computers, for research, design et cetera, but once offices were full of draftsmen and women, with their drawing boards, but now engineers are sat in front of computers.

Robot means slave, and so, yes, automation is replacing human endeavour in numerous fields, but we still need humans to clean, bodily care for, nurse and administer medical treatment to the ailing and sick but ultimately, we will no longer be required at all.

Self-driving-car-data-analysis.jpg

Driverless cars are coming, driverless trains are coming, congestion fines are all automatic and it won’t be long before parking attendants are consigned to history, along with accountants and city traders and I suspect there won’t be any workers at Nissan in another decade.

And that’s presumably why succeeding governments treat us like cattle, viewing us like we have no importance, particularly after being sufficiently productive throughout a lifetime.

At the end of the day, our retirement has been stolen and we can pay in as much as we like but we’ll never get it back and it’s inhumane to implement the new pension age of 67 across the board, without taking into account the kind of jobs people do and those executing this should be charged with manslaughter.

    

Boris Johnson’s Plan For Government At A Glance

xRebdCDg_400x400.jpg

 

Britain had its second Queen’s Speech in three months as Boris Johnson set out his proposal for a Tory majority government as the Prime Minister declared the seismic election had given way to the most radical Queen’s Speech in a generation that will free the country from the stranglehold of uncertainty.

And while the last State Opening of Parliament in October was a glorified pre-manifesto that’d never pass, the Tories now have a thumping majority of 80 which means these laws will happen and all 22 Bills that were submitted last time are effectively being repeated, plus more than a dozen new ones from the Tory manifesto.

Some are about Brexit, others are suitable measures including making flexible working by default, ultimately scrapping no-fault evictions for renters and cutting business rates on pubs, cinemas and gig venues.

But others will still worry for fear that Boris Johnson is using his newfound power to make extensive ideological changes to the country over the next two years and just days after he won the election, the Queen’s Speech endorsed an embargo on all-out rail strikes, a radical overhaul of the constitution and measures that experts fear could lock left-wing parties further from power.

So, what’s in the Queen’s Speech and what does it all mean?

Well, it means that Boris Johnson plans an extensive overhaul of Britain’s constitution only a week after gaining control. With the Prime Minister announcing that he’s going to be setting up a new commission which could fundamentally alter how Britain operates.

He will use the pretext of rebuilding confidence in politics, even though he was extensively thought to have impaired it during his time at No. 10 so far and Boris Johnson’s Queen’s Speech promises to explore the more comprehensive aspects of the constitution in-depth and to develop proposals to rebuild trust in our institutions and in how our government functions.

But the changes could prompt concerns that the Tory government is endeavouring to reinforce its power and the new unit could redraw constituency boundaries to lessen the number of MPs from 650 to 600, a move which could favour the Conservatives.

Boris Johnson could also revoke the Fixed Term Parliaments Act, meaning he could call an election when he wants to.

There could even be a move to abolish the Human Rights Act, replacing it with a bill of rights that could lower protections and in the wake of Boris Johnson’s Supreme Court loss, Britain’s most superior judges could be made more answerable to Parliament, which could weaken the freedom of the courts.

The Tories will also crack down hard on left-wing causes with prohibitions on both all-out rail strikes and boycott campaigns in the public sector and a new law will hit unions with damages or sanctions if they don’t comply with a Minimum Service Agreement to keep trains running, even during a strike.

Unions have likened the plan to something from a right-wing ‘junta’, and in the meantime, public sector organisations will be banned from blacklisting goods or services from foreign lands including Israel.

Flexible working could become the default setting for all workers under new rules proposed by the government and as part of the Queen’s Speech, Boris Johnson’s Employment Bill will give workers more control over when they work.

Currently, employees can apply for flexible working if they’ve worked continuously for the same employer for the last 26 weeks. The employer then has three months, or longer if agreed with the staff member applying, to decide but the new rules, which are subject to consultation, would make it the default unless employers have a good reason not to.

And under the government’s flexible working, this could refer to job distribution, working from home, working part-time, flexitime, annualised hours, staggered hours, phased retirement and compressed hours.

An NHS Funding Bill will address the Prime Minister’s £34 billion a year cash term (not real terms) increase in NHS funding by 2023 into law but this is a political stunt to show the voters that Boris Johnson will keep his election promise but it has pretty little meaning past that.

It’s up to Boris Johnson if he wants to keep his promises and if he doesn’t he can just revoke the Bill anyway.

The Queen confirmed plans to scrap some hospital car parking charges but not all and the government will prioritise and fully define those groups subject to a more comprehensive evaluation of financial impact.

They will include blue badge holders, regular outpatient attendees, visitors with families who are gravely ill or have an extended stay in hospital or carers where appropriate and staff working shifts that mean public transport can’t be used.

A Renters Reform Bill will stop no-fault evictions, something which the Tory government was accused of dithering over but landlords will, however, get more rights to obtain possession of their property through the courts to make it faster and easier for them to get their property back quickly.

There will also be a lifetime deposit which renters carry around with them so they don’t have to save for a new one each time they move.

Pubs, cinemas and small businesses will see their business rates halved next year. This Bill will endeavour to support Britain’s struggling High Streets with a list of new measures that will see smaller businesses pay less in tax.

The 50 per cent reduction, announced as part of the Queen’s Speech, is targeted at retailers, such as shops, restaurants, hairdressers and pubs, boosting the current discount of 33 per cent off.

The government claim that nine out of ten independent firms will qualify for the relief, which is available to retailers with a rateable value below £51,000, giving them a saving of up to £12,500 in total and for the first time, independent cinemas and music venues will also qualify, in a bid to safeguard local entertainment.

A current £1,500 relief for local newspapers will also be extended by another year, to help keep 150 titles going.

A Counter-Terrorism (Sentencing and Release) Bill will give the most serious terrorist offenders a 14-year minimum prison term and the likelihood of early release from jail will be withdrawn for any offenders who received an Extended Determinate Sentence.

The announcement was hurried into existence by Boris Johnson following the London Bridge attack, whose culprit was a convicted terrorist out on licence.

Boris Johnson was condemned by the father of one of the victims, Jack Merritt, for politicising the attack.

Intelligence chiefs are to be given extensive powers to disrupt and target foreign operatives living and working in the United Kingdom and the Espionage Bill, drawn up in the wake of the Russian Novichok assault in Salisbury, will strive to clamp down on hostile states activities.

And the catch-all law will shut down legal loopholes to ensure it’s always illegal to carry out clandestine operations in the United Kingdom, in an attempt to stop possible rival powers such as Russia or China.

GettyImages-1094145608-1160x801.jpg

Work began on the law after Theresa May vowed to tackle Russia’s shadowy GRU military intelligence service following the Salisbury nerve attack but there were reportedly concerns from some members of the security community that they lacked the legal structure to seek individuals involved in activity that was being done to help a foreign power or disrupt people in the United Kingdom.

The Bill is supposed to give authorities wide-reaching powers comparable to the US’s Foreign Agents Registration Act, which forces any representative of a foreign power to disclose themselves and their movements.

A Building Safety Bill and Fire Safety Bill will strengthen enforcement and punishments against Grenfell style building owners who don’t comply with a new safety regime but it stops short of saying there will be criminal sanctions as ministers proposed before.

There will also be a Bill to ensure those who sustained life-changing injuries for which Thomas Cook would have been liable still get compensation after the firm collapsed but no sign of authority had been announced in October, which would have endeavoured to prevent a repeat of the Thomas Cook debacle by giving the Civil Aviation Authority oversight over airlines in trouble.

On justice, a Royal Commission to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the criminal justice system will be established and on security, a review of the Official Secrets Act is promised to determine if it needs overhauling in the wake of the Salisbury chemical weapons attack as well as considering whether there’s a case for updating treason laws and an integrated security, defence and foreign policy review will take place to reassess the nation’s position in the world.

Ministers will prepare legislation to better internet security for children and vulnerable people but there’s no full Bill announced yet.

There will nevertheless be interim codes of practice and a media literacy strategy to stay protected online.

And they want an end to irritating allegations against troops and on defence, proposals will be brought forward to stop vexatious claims that undermine our armed forces.

However, Boris Johnson seems to have abandoned promises he made in the autumn to safeguard workers rights after Brexit.

Ministers promised in October to include certain pledges in the EU (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill but signals from No. 10 imply they’ve been abandoned even though Tory Michael Gove insisted it’d all be fine because there was a separate Bill in the speech to deal with workers rights. Well, there is but it doesn’t fulfil Boris Johnson’s promises on workers rights.

Back in October, the government stated ministers would make a statement explaining where any new laws could affect rights and be forced to report regularly on plans to echo new EU laws. Yet a briefing just states the new Bill will protect and enhance worker’s rights as the UK leaves the EU.

The Tories have kicked the can down the road on social care yet again with no definite plans for the ailing sector contained in the Queen’s Speech. Despite Boris Johnson saying he had a solution on the steps of No. 10, the Queen’s Speech instead promises a cross-party strategy to be taken forward urgently. The one red line is that people won’t be forced to sell their homes to pay for care.

Theresa May was accused of kicking the can down the road after she repeatedly shelved proposals for a green paper on social care first planned for summer 2017 but her blighted social care plans in the 2017 general election campaign were dubbed a ‘dementia tax’ and blamed the Tories for losing their majority in the 2017 general election.

Boris Johnson was accused of using the Queen’s Speech as an obvious attempt to rig the result of the next election but the Queen’s Speech confirms measures will be implemented to force voters to show a photo ID before being permitted to vote.

Hundreds of people were denied their right to vote in last year’s local elections after ministers pushed through a pilot scheme, despite warnings it could disenfranchise older voters and people from minority groups and the trial, which was held in eight council areas, resulted in 819 people being turned away.

That was despite official figures showing there were just eight allegations of people lying about who they were at a polling station, known as personation, in 2018.

The Tories will bring back the Domestic Abuse Bill, which fell as a consequence of Boris Johnson’s unlawful suspension of Parliament.

This law was introduced under Theresa May but still wasn’t achieved, to the wrath of campaigners.

It will prevent abusers from being able to cross-examine their victims in the family courts and victims will be considered acceptable for special measures in criminal courts, like giving testimony by video link.

It will create a statutory definition of domestic abuse to include physical violence, emotional abuse, economic abuse and coercive control and a Domestic Abuse Commissioner will observe the response of councils and the justice system.

Plans for quickie divorces will also come forward again thanks to a Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill after being delayed under the Tories.

The changes will eliminate the requirement to establish unsatisfactory conduct or a period of separation and instead couples will be able to simply tell a court their marriage has irretrievably broken down and an obstructive partner will no longer be able to contest a divorce from happening and in those measures place will be a 20 week waiting period between the start of the proceedings and the final order for a divorce.

The EU (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill will implement Boris Johnson’s Brexit agreement with the EU by January 31. It covers the transition period, running to December 2020, where we will continue to observe EU rules and send money to the EU.

But there will be a legal block on it being extended, even if we don’t have a trade deal in time and this jeopardises the United Kingdom plunging into a no-deal.

There are further concerns that it forces customs checks on goods going from Britain to Northern Ireland and doesn’t include previously promised safeguards for workers rights.

The Fisheries Bill will have powers to control access to UK waters with licences for foreign vessels, which will no longer have the automatic right to enter our seas and the new powers will force constraints on UK fishermen, either quotas or number of days at sea, to replace the current Common Fisheries Policy.

Grants will also be available to fishermen to conserve, enhance and restore the marine and aquatic habitat and EU law could be altered to allow the United Kingdom to respond to new advice on fish produce.

The Agriculture Bill will set up a seven-year transition period that slowly decreases payments to farmers that come under the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy.

The current subsidy system, which rewards the amount of land owned, will be replaced and focus on action farmers take to farm sustainably and improve the environment.

The Trade Bill allows the legal carry over of trade deals that the United Kingdom currently enjoys as an EU member. Yet, this carryover is still not automatic and the United Kingdom would need to negotiate the change with individual nations around the globe.

The Bill also establishes a new independent UK body to protect British firms against unfair trade methods, like the dumping of imports such as Chinese steel.

The Immigration and Social Security Co-Ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill will end free movement following Brexit, including imposing checks on EU citizens who come to Britain from January 2021.

It will pave the way for an Australia style points-based system, which UKIP had previously supported. It would score potential migrants based on their education, skills and anticipated salary level.

And EU citizen’s rights to benefits will be decreased to those of non-EU citizens from 2021 and there’ll be a fast track NHS visa scheme and the yearly allowance for seasonal agricultural workers will increase from 2,500 to 10,000.

This Financial Services Bill will simplify the process which allows overseas investment funds to be sold in the United Kingdom and the government has trumpeted this as cutting of red tape while upholding the UK’s world-leading standards but it could prompt concerns from some about letting financial markets run free.

The Bill further allows for long-term market access to the United Kingdom for financial services firms based in Gibraltar.

Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill was designed to clarify the law on disputes over children that spread across national borders. It includes three treaties, 1996, 2005 and 2007 Hague Conventions.

They include making it more difficult for parents who leave the country to dodge paying child maintenance and allowing co-operation between governments on family matters.

A new Health Service Safety Investigations Body will have powers to handle inquiries into NHS incidents that have implications for patient safety, according to a Health Service Safety Investigations Bill.

People will be forbidden from leaking or publishing information held by this body, to ensure witnesses and whistleblowers are more honest and there will also be a burden on the Health Secretary to ensure enough medical examiners are appointed in England and advise, guidance and training will be provided to local bodies to improve medical inquiries.

Violent offenders and sex offenders will face longer sentences in the Sentencing Bill and the point where prisoners are usually released will be moved from halfway through a sentence to two-thirds for adults serving at least four years for serious violent and sexual offenders.

The focus appears to be a U-turn on previous Tory bids to focus on rehabilitation, which would have removed the need for the shortest sentences in favour of community work.

The Bill will further extend the scope of reasons a judge can use to spank a whole-life prison term on a condemned murderer and for Foreign National Offenders legislation would drastically increase the penalties for foreign offenders who return to the United Kingdom in violation of a deportation order.

The specific increase, however, wasn’t spelt out in the Queen Speech and since October it’s been demoted from a full-blown Bill to just legislation, which could mean it’s bound up in something else.

Ministers maintain the move will help disrupt the actions of international crime groups and Home Secretary Priti Patel announced that we’ve been a soft touch on foreign criminals for too long.

A Prisoners (Disclosure of Information About Victims) Bill will make it a lot easier to refuse parole to murderers, or those guilty of manslaughter, who declined to say where their victims are buried.

The same law will apply to people who take improper photos of kids while refusing to say who those children were. The law will be known as ‘Helen’s Law’ after 22-year-old Helen McCourt was murdered in 1988, leading to a lengthy campaign by her mother Marie.

Her killer was convicted but refused to say where he hid her body but despite claims by ministers, the law won’t force Parole Boards to keep these killers and paedophiles locked up.

Instead, it will put a legal responsibility on them to take into account the matter when considering release.

A Serious Violence Bill will put a new legal obligation on agencies like councils, schools, social services and health providers to work together and yield data to prevent serious violence.

This will include introducing an explicit priority in law on serious violence for Community Safety Partnerships and it comes following a surge in knife crimes but critics are likely to complain it’s shifting the responsibility onto cuts-hit by local authorities.

Police will face a new test to rate their driving due to a Police Protections Bill, which can then be taken into account if they end up being investigated over a collision. This is in a bid to prevent police facing prosecution unjustly for people they harm or kill when taking part in a car chase.

The Bill will further require the Home Office to report yearly on the progress on the Police Covenant, and Special Constables (volunteers) will be able to get the same support as members of the Police Federation.

An Extradition (Provisional Arrest) Bill is designed to make it easier for police to arrest internationally wanted fugitives, without the requirement to apply for a UK arrest warrant and the purpose is to cut out a waiting period of six to eight hours which fugitives can use to escape prosecution and those being arrested must be subject to an Interpol Red Notice.

Initially, it will only apply to those issued by a restricted number of countries with trusted justice systems, the other members of the Five Eyes intelligence group, the US, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, and two non-EU European states, Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Nevertheless, the Government will be able to add other nations by lesser laws, perhaps with minimal scrutiny in Parliament.

Restaurants will be required to hand over tips to workers under an Employment Bill, more than three years after the Tories first vowed to crack down on abuses and the new law in the Queen’s Speech will force employers to pass on all gratuities in full and to distribute fairly any pooled tips.

The Tories first pledged to tackle the injustice under then-business secretary Sajid Javid who ordered a two-month consultation ending on June 27, 2016, but then Theresa May then failed to bring in the change throughout her time in office.

Now the Employment (Allocation of Tips) Bill also includes a Code of Practice for restaurants, bars and cafes to make the system clear.

587a2a674b645de764d31be25a32594c.jpg

Ten years ago, the Mirror launched a Fair Tips campaign with Unite the Union after a Pizza Express manager was dismissed for revealing that the company kept 8 per cent of tips paid by bank cards as an administration fee.

On pensions, there were new rules planned around everything from saving to viewing to accessing money in a Pensions Schemes Bill.

First was saving, with proposals announced for new collective workplace pensions schemes.

These would see workers and firms pay into a single, shared pot, rather than individual pots for each person with the view that it could be more effective and offer greater value.

Second, there were plans to force firms to take part in the new pensions dashboard project, this was set to be a single location where you could see all your retirement savings at once but unless everyone got involved it wouldn’t work, so plans to force firms to take part were a required first step.

Lastly, there were new rules proposed about where, when and to who you could assign your pension to. These were required as there had been instances where scammers had persuaded people to transfer their money and respectable firms had been powerless to prevent it.

On a more technical aspect, there were also larger penalties and criminal offence planned for firms that break pensions laws and better stability for people saving when businesses go bust.

Bills will endeavour to roll out gigabit-capable broadband across the United Kingdom to deliver nationwide coverage as soon as possible and the government maintains it will provide faster speeds that can download an HD film in less than 45 seconds and that all new buildings will require the infrastructure to support gigabit connections and will be introduced into most new build homes.

Police will be given new powers to stop the unlawful use of drones in an Air Traffic Management and Unmanned Aircraft Bill, this entails forcing a person to land a drone, with heightened stop and search capabilities if an offence concerning an unmanned aircraft has taken place and this law will also apply to model planes and model helicopters.

It comes after several drones or model aircraft collisions skyrocketed from 6 in 2014 to 125 in 2018, including a spate of shutdowns of Gatwick Airport in a mystery that still hasn’t been resolved.

The government has reacted to pressure to ramp up environmental protection with an Environment Bill and it comes as critics warn that the UK’s regulations will be more limited than the EU’s once Brexit happens.

The new moves included introducing charges for single-use plastics following on from the carrier bag charge and councils will be given powers to clamp down on sources of air pollution and communities will have more of a say on the protection of natural habitats through the Local Nature Recovery Strategies.

The Queen’s Speech endorsed the creation of a new Office of Environmental Protection which was initially announced last December and it will have the ability to take the government to court to implement environmental law following Brexit.

Climate change has been pushed up the agenda in recent months with demonstrations organised by groups including Extinction Rebellion, and the international school strikes begun by Swedish teen Greta Thunberg.

new-prime-minister-boris-johnsons-girlfriend-carrie-symonds-news-photo-1157538816-1564047894.jpg

Boris Johnson’s sweetheart Carrie Symonds, who is a senior adviser for US environmental campaign group Oceana, has urged politicians to act, stating they have a gigantic responsibility to care for the environment.

News-25.pngThe maximum punishment for animal cruelty offences will be massively ramped up from six months to five years, confirming plans already announced under the Tories and there will also be a clear statement in domestic law that animals are sentient beings.

And there will be a duty on government to have all due consideration to the well-being of sentient animals when planning and managing new policies, however, the status has been peeled back from a previous full Bill.

There were previously other Bills not mentioned by the Queen herself in addition to the 22. They include allowing the building of part of HS2, despite the chance the rail line would be discarded altogether in a government review.

It further includes a Bill to make it easier for NHS hospitals to manufacturing and trial medicines and medical devices and other technical Bills will allow further payments under the Windrush compensation scheme to Brits who arrived from the Caribbean before the 1970s, and technical modifications to legal sentencing in the criminal courts.

Of course, there’s a no bigger fool than a Brexiteer and we have all been misled by Boris Johnson and I can visualise what the remarks will be when it all kicks home on what people have voted for and I’m guessing we won’t wait long either.

But buffoon Boris Johnson really is a laugh a minute and I wager he can hear the sloshing when nodding his head and things may have not been great under Labour but under the Tories, they’ve increased two-fold with numerous people who have died under the Tories and you could be next!

Boris Johnson lied his way to power and the Tories have given us food banks, homelessness, NHS crisis, child poverty and tax evasion although that’s not to say there was no homelessness at any time when Labour was in power, the NHS has been in crisis for decades and child poverty has existed from the year dot.

But now numerous people out there believe that it’s splendid that Boris Johnson has such a huge majority to reshape Britain in his image and that it will be victorious but what’s happening here is that people are supporting a fascist government and you couldn’t make this crap up if you tried and we should be speechless at the fact that no one can see what’s coming but it seems that Boris Johnson is for the few and not the many.

And do we know how and when Brexit is getting done yet? The idea appears to be that we leave but don’t leave on January 31st, then flounder about for another year and then crash out the following year.

And we should be sick and tired of having only 2 voting options, Labour or Tory and our constitution need to be restored properly and introduced with proportionate representation.

But then when Brexit comes home to roost, the Tories might get their just deserts and won’t be able to wiggle out of the blame, and this may well see the end of the Tories when people realise they’ve been misled by the Conservatives.

Boris Johnson was the one who avoided most of the election forums and hid in the fridge and the few sweeties will hide a wealth of Bills to facilitate exploitation and the rules for striking are already punitive but banning it, who the hell does he think he is, Putin!

And we’ve been deceived and misled yet again, but then that’s what Boris Johnson does and the people voted for it and it’s astonishing that in the Queen’s reign that the Queen never learned the art of public speaking because everything that she read from her speech was seemingly provided for by her advisors and I hope that the younger royals speak more from the heart than read prepared speeches.

I guess we could let her make it up as she goes along and yet again, nothing for the pensioners or carers, yet they save the Government thousands because they get neglected and many carers are stressed from caring for the cared for, which is absurd because then they end up in a care home which costs thousands more than these poor pensioners even get paid.

But then did we expect anything else from the Tories after breaking their manifesto promise over TV licences, at least next time we should be informed of what we’re voting for?

But still, people are saying that Boris Johnson is the finest Prime Minister ever, or at least he could be but then some people have a pretty low bar of expectation. However, every case should be assessed on its merits and we should make a list of Boris Johnson’s accomplishments as a Prime Minister.

The problem is some people let greed get the better of them by voting for the despicable Tories and people have short memories.

Who got rid of 22,500 police and waited until the streets were practically uncontrolled before agreeing to restore 20,000, it’s sickening.

Who was responsible for the huge increases in homelessness and food banks? Who cut 35,000 armed service personnel? Or a 10,000 fire service personnel? Yes, the Tory fools and the short-sighted that voted them in.

All they want is tax cuts, then whine when the roads are appalling and there’s no police about and it seems the Tories won the election and the working class lost the lot, and the claim is that the Tories will protect people from having to sell their homes for Social Care but nothing about how the Tories will make them pay for their care.

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started