Will Camilla be Queen?

 

camilla parker bowles best hats.jpg

The rules and customs of the British Royal Family might date back centuries, but they’ve also been adjusted as the monarchy has entered the 21st century, but one important topic is what will happen when Prince Charles ultimately becomes King, and whether his wife Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, will then become Queen.

prince-charles-george-charlotte-louis-t.jpg

Camilla will technically become Queen Camilla once Charles takes the throne, rather than Princess Consort, the title Clarence House previously said she “intended to use” when she married Charles in 2005, and even though Camilla goes by the Duchess of Cornwall, she’s still technically the Princess of Wales, so by that reasoning she would be Queen when Charles ascends the throne.

We all know that in Common Law that at the moment Camilla is Princess of Wales, she is, she’s not just called that. Therefore, if she’s married to the King when he becomes King, she will be Queen, they may choose to name her something different but she will be Queen.

Camilla will be a ‘Queen’ in the restricted legal sense of being the wife of the king or Queen Consort, but she can’t be forced to be called Queen Consort, but her performance as the wife of the King is, by interpretation, that of Queen.

And even though Camilla will legally be a Queen she doesn’t have to take the title, but when Camilla Parker Bowles married Prince Charles in 2005, following his divorce from the defunct Princess Diana, she took the Duchess of Cornwall as her title instead of Princess of Wales.

Camilla was not popular or well-loved, although this has changed a lot since the marriage as Camilla has taken on a number of patronages and Charles is much happier. Still, it was concluded that Camilla would be mannered as the Duchess of Cornwall, even though, of course, she is the Princess of Wales.

Only a shift in the law would mean Camilla wouldn’t technically be Queen. She will be Queen unless Parliament orders differently, and Parliament can do what it likes, but can you really see Parliament enacting primary law to amend current legislation?

Parliament can at any time intervene, and a new act of parliament could decide the titles of the Royals and their functions in a different way, and nothing is set in stone about the monarchy under the United Kingdom’s flexible constitution.

In fact, there was a significant constitutional development relating to royal titles in 2013 when the Succession to the Crown Act was passed. Previous to its creation, men in the line of succession to the throne would take preference over women.

Nevertheless, the act declared, in determining the succession to the Crown, that any gender of a person born after 28 October 2011 does not give that person, or that person’s successor, preference over any other person whenever they’re born.

The Prince of Wales married Camilla Parker Bowles in 2005 and he will determine whether to give her the title Queen Camilla, although there is some debate around the position because Charles could be barred from handing his second wife the reputable title if he is hit with a legal challenge, and the legitimacy of Charles and Camilla’s marriage could be called into question, which could precipitate a legal dispute.

And without a public approval from Prince Charles’ mother, the Queen, Duchess Camilla has been left isolated and vulnerable.

The couple has seen off doubts as to the legitimacy of their marriage after some constitutional experts declared it was unlawful as critics contended that Charles should have been prevented from marrying in a register office by two statutes, the Marriage Act of 1836, which bans royals from marrying in register offices, and the 1949 Marriage Act.

However, nothing short of a debacle can stop Charles ascending the throne following his mother’s death, but a legal challenge to the legitimacy of his marriage might put a stop to Camilla being crowned.

The-Queen-t.jpg

Camilla, 71, has been left vulnerable because the Queen has so far declined to mediate and openly back the duchess as the next Queen of the country. One answer would be if the Queen were to make a public endorsement of Camilla, indicating that it’s her wish that she’s crowned alongside Charles.

However, there’s no indication of this at the moment, and of course, this leaves the Duchess in an isolated and exposed position, one that Charles finds it difficult to understand.

This is a continuing dilemma for Camilla which will not be properly established until Charles eventually supersedes the Queen, but Prince Charles is understood to want to make Camilla Queen Consort when he ascends to the throne despite earlier claims she will be known as Princess Consort when he is crowned.

Charles and Camilla have been married for 12 years, but the pair have a long and complex history, and even though the couple met when they were young, they both married other people. Camilla married Andrew Parker-Bowles, a retired military officer, but the couple divorced in 2005.

princess-diana-beauty-t.jpg

Charles married Princess Diana, the mother of Prince William and Prince Harry, but following Diana’s death in 1997, the couple brought their relationship out into the open, with Camilla attending a hunt with Charles and his two sons.

The pair were first photographed together as a couple in January 1999 as they left the Ritz Hotel after celebrating a party for Camilla’s sister, Annabel.
Charles eventually married Camilla in 2005 during a low key ceremony at Windsor Guildhall and the duchess was given an engagement ring that once belonged to his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother.

The Queen and Prince Philip, as well as Camilla’s parents, did not attend the wedding, apparently because the couple had both previously been married.
But, they did attend the service of prayer and dedication that followed, led by the Archbishop of Canterbury, with the Queen saying later on that she was happy in the knowledge that her son was home and dry with the woman he loves.

Camilla has cemented her position in the Royal Family in recent years and the Queen even promoted her to the Privy Council in June 2016, and the Queen’s promotion of Camilla was regarded by many as a likely sign that her son and successor plans to make her Queen Camilla, but her title will not be formally established until his accession.

But there are numerous people out there that believe that Charles will be extremely lucky to become King, let alone dragging his baggage with him and that he should be circumvented, and if Charles survives the Queen, he will be King, despite any damage he’s done to himself, he appears to be pretty healthy.

As for Camilla, whether or not she also survives Queen Elizabeth is a debatable subject. Camilla’s mother died at the age of 72 of osteoporosis, a malady which Camilla’s brother, Mark was already starting to exhibit manifestations of when he died in 2014.

Camilla has already been a heavy smoker, which makes her more predisposed to ailments like lung cancer, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, which in turn leads to emphysema, so there’s even more chance that by the time Charles becomes King he will have become a widower twice.

Nevertheless, it appears that their marriage is a bit of a facade with Camilla and Charles having separate homes most of the time. Camilla caused a lot of sadness and people have long recollections about how Charles and Camilla treated Diana.

If Camilla has any dignity she will refuse the title of Queen because there are many out there who would never call her their Queen because they believe that she hasn’t earned it. Considering Camilla is an adulterer and a divorcee, according to Royal law, she should never be crowned Queen and Charles as King for that matter, and she will forever be memorialised as the hag that destroyed Princess Diana.

And if Camilla wants to show another side of herself and win the people over for the rest of her life, she should refuse the title of Queen out of regard to Diana and the British people. Hankering after a title is not a great look, and she should be happy that she managed to marry the man she was apparently in love with after Diana went to an early grave.

Furthermore, she should never be permitted to be Queen, because it makes a mockery out of the whole Edward and Mrs Simpson saga and Princess Margaret, and with the variations on the protocol in the royal family now, it appears to make the precepts to accommodate what they want.

gettyimages-996288038-1546517149.jpg

Charles should have stood down to marry her and also Harry should have bowed out to marry his showgirl, they don’t have a part to play, and there are far too many on the freebie bandwagon now, once the rules are bent, it becomes broken.

hqdefault.jpg

And would Charles give up the throne for his beloved, as Edward did?

Furthermore, there have been divorce speculations about Prince Charles and Camilla divorcing, and a spokesperson for Clarence Hous, the official London home of The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of Cornwall, has been pressed for comment on rumours the royal pair are in divorce proceedings.

And there have been claims from a royal source that Prince Charles is consulting with a divorce lawyer, and that he and Camilla plan to divorce shortly, and Clarence House was asked if the royal family would make a statement about the allegations but stated that it wasn’t something they would clarify, and there are presently stories that royal fans are outraged by the unsupported assertions.

It’s been reported that the royal couple are expected to announce that they plan to divorce imminently and that the Prince of Wales has now signed the papers, and that Fiona Shackleton is considered to be the leading divorce lawyer.

And a source has said that the couple have hardly seen each other in the past few months, and Her Majesty has stepped in to make sure there is no speculation, but Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, was not present at the Queen’s pre-Christmas lunch at Buckingham Palace, due to being ill with a cold, and she further did not attend the Christmas Day church service at St Mary Magdalene Church in Sandringham.

_103837189_ce673d58-1c12-4d66-953a-6616aeb4c866.jpg

Camilla was also not present at Princess Eugenie’s wedding in October owing to prior engagements, and at the time, Clarence House said that the Duchess was visiting a local school harvest festival close by her home in Balmoral.

1058740.jpg

But while the entire world has been obsessed with Kate and Meghan’s dispute and William and Harry falling out, behind palace walls there’s been a much greater drama brewing, and despite happy public appearances, the revelation about Charles and Camilla’s relationship has been made apparent to everyone who’s in the royal clique.

And supposedly, the Queen has requested that the news is not made known until Meghan’s feud with Kate and William dies down, she simply can’t handle more rumours at this time, and as first in line to the throne, Prince Charles will automatically become King when the Queen dies as the throne is technically never vacant.

Yet, the accession council would need to be convened at St James’s Palace to formally name Charles the King, and he would be required to swear loyalty to Parliament and to the Church of England in front of the council.

Parliament_at_Sunset.JPG

In turn, the Houses of Parliament will be summoned to swear loyalty to him. The words to the National Anthem will be replaced and new postage stamps and currency designed to display Prince Charles’ ascension to the throne.

prince-william-duke-of-cambridge-SONUPDATE0418.jpg

The only way Prince William would become king is if Prince Charles decides to renounce and relinquish the throne to him, but Charles has increased his workload since 2013 as the Queen has decreased in what seems to be a handover of the reins.

Charles is really keen on Green agendas, and it now seems like he’s recycling his wife too, but Charles never appears to get the message that the people don’t want two divorcees as leaders, both of who were unfaithful to their previous spouses.

And if they can’t be faithful to their spouses, how on earth could they possibly be true and loyal to Great Britain? Nevertheless, this Charles and Camilla thing is nothing in comparison to the capers and aversions of our royal predecessors, for many a Prince or King, anything in a skirt was fair game.

The Royal Family have become the laughing stock of the world and it should be abolished after the Queen passes away, the Royals are old fashioned with some pretty questionable social behaviour, these might have been acceptable in the 16th century, but not in the 21st century.

And Camilla should be thrilled that she’s treated like a Queen, so does she really require a title? And most of the people don’t like her, and William should be the real successor to the Queen, whether or not Charles makes it onto the throne for a bit or not.

And Charles and Camilla’s union is not in the realms of love because it’s contaminated with betrayal and the death of a wonderful much loved abused woman, and the tapes of a secret call between Camilla and Charles whilst he was married to Diana, is enough to make anyone barf with the image of Charles wishing he was the tampon that she was using.

2365542.jpg

Camilla’s great grandmother was a courtesan, so why aren’t we shocked that bedding Royalty continues in the family? People might have moved on and accepted this woman as a consort, life goes on, but memories never fade.

And there it was on tape, in his own words and voice, quite different from the distortions that were assigned to Diana, you really can’t look at Charles and Camilla without seeing a Tampax in your mind, and perhaps the Queen should skip a generation and instead of Charles becoming King, William and Kate should become King and Queen of England.

Rape Day!

addiction-to-video-games.jpg

QBd9QJPPRG6JkR8FAbiQML-1200-80.jpg

Steam, a digital distribution platform, recently announced it would not ship a new computer game called “Rape Day”. This video game lets you play as a sociopathic rapist for thrills, and it’s now found its way onto the internet through other outlets globally.

A Squarespace website has since been created which highlights information about how and where to download the game for free, and US-based Squarespace which is one of the most popular website developers should disable this website immediately.

Rape Day lets you portray a serial killer rapist during a zombie apocalypse, and the author of the game describes it as a visual novel where the protagonist can literally harass, murder people and rape women as you choose to progress through the story.

Raping and killing women is not a game, and the creators of this video game should not be permitted to profit from extolling sexual brutality against women.

If played enough and by certain people, video games can affect people’s’ mental and physical well-being, and even if some believe that video games may not have real-world outcomes on the majority, is it worth the risk? And a game centred on raping and killing women is unacceptable and should be eliminated from the market.

And despite not appearing in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), there has been increasing concerns about people who seem to be fixated with video games and consume far too much time playing them.

Addiction to video games is being considered for upcoming editions of the DSM, but for now, it’s not seen as an approved clinical problem, and despite its unofficial status, there’s little question that some people, whether they are kids, teenagers, or adults who play video games excessively, that video game addiction can create problems in other critical sectors of their lives.

This doesn’t suggest that everyone who plays video games becomes addicted, in fact, only a small minority appear to develop significant problems. Millions of people play video games in moderation as a way to spend time with friends, unwind after a stressful day, and as a simple form of entertainment.

Still, keeping gaming habits under control is not something that comes easily to everyone. For some people, online computer gaming becomes the most important thing in their lives, and academic achievement slumps as little thought is given to studying or school grades.

Someone with an obsession with video games may miss work or neglect job-related duties due to an attraction with a preferred game, and relationships may suffer when one partner is overlooked in support of video games, and when video games are no longer a simple distraction from the real world but a compulsion that overtakes all other pursuits, this can point to many adverse consequences in the gamer’s life.

Obviously, not all video game enthusiasts will be affected in precisely the same way, but the list beneath features some of the more common consequences of an obsession to video games.

Some people dealing with an addiction to video games may further struggle with problems such as depression, low self-esteem, high-stress levels, and shyness or social anxiety, and if they see these difficulties that their extreme gaming is causing, yet are powerless to regulate it, they may also encounter feelings of guilt or a feeling of powerlessness.

And while video game addiction can almost certainly be made worse by other psychological problems, for example, depressed feelings, it may further add to these problems in a circular fashion, such as, depression boosting extreme gaming, which makes the depression more serious, which leads to more gaming.

Clearly, if one’s weekly activities are largely comprised of playing video games, health and occasionally personal cleanliness may be overlooked, and people with an addiction to video games may no longer take part in previously enjoyed physical activities or exercise, and may develop bad sleeping habits contingent on gaming schedules, and may frequently choose unhealthy diets that simply are convenient to snack on while gaming.

An addiction to video games can create difficulties within the family. For instance, the parents of a teen who is dependent to video games may permit extreme gaming for a while and pray that it goes away by itself, but if their child exhibits no signs of getting his gaming under control they will ultimately demand change.

The teen may then become outraged at his progenitors for interfering in his life, deny that it’s creating any problems, and maintain that it’s none of their business.

Parents with a child or teen who is addicted to video games frequently have regular arguments about time limits on games and the disregard of other responsibilities, and even for players who are not addicted, video games can be a pretty costly kind of entertainment.

It’s really easy to spend thousands of pounds on computer upgrades, new gaming consoles, subscriptions to online services, recently released games and the newest expansion packs, and occasionally, people with an addiction to video games may be dismissed owing to bad performance on the job, for instance, prioritising gaming over work obligations, playing games while at work, often showing up late, or missing work completely in support of gaming.

Academic achievement is usually one of the most visible causalities of video game addiction, and children, teens, and university scholars who employ all their unfettered time playing video games will almost certainly see their grades decline.

They may disregard forthcoming deadlines, promise to study “tomorrow”, deny that they have homework, and race through assignments so that they can continue playing, someone who’s addicted to video games will spend more time and more hours in front of a computer or television screen, and less time with other people, such as friends and family which decreases.

One to one in person contact with others is reduced and online or virtual contact is increased, and for those who seldom spend time with others in person, online only friends may not prevent the gaming addict from feeling socially isolated and detached from the world around them.

Some children will spend 16 hours a day on their Xbox, which will end up creating serious relationship problems among families, and can become a serious problem, even though the child will not feel the same.

 

XboxOneS_CnsleCntrllr_Hrz_FrntTlt_TransBG_RGB.0.jpg

And for those parents who discover their child playing Xbox at 2.30am, the child’s defence will be that they didn’t realise the time. But your child comes out of his bedroom for about 15 minutes for meals, and then rushes their food so that they can get back to their Xbox, then the parents will scold them for doing this, but that only creates more arguments.

Brexit Turns Ugly

the-queen-at-the-science-museum.jpg

The Queen is to be evacuated if Brexit turns ugly. These contingency evacuation procedures have been in existence since the cold war but have now been repurposed in the case of civil disorder following a no-deal Brexit.

And now there are proposals to remove the royal family, including Queen Elizabeth, to secure locations away from London, but these plans show a needless frenzy by officials over a no-deal Brexit as senior royals remained in London throughout the bombardment in the second world war, so why so much alarm now?

25-1.jpg

What, is she leaving to go to the EU as well? Perhaps Theresa May could offer her a spare bedroom at number 10? And where would she be relocated to because all of Great Britain would be hit, not only London?

And why the Queen, why not the Prime Minister and her cabinet, they would need to go into hiding for messing everything up, and I’m sure Prince Philip would drive her to safety!

But we must make sure that the royal bloodline is protected, and bureaucrats, well don’t even get me started because Theresa May is now proving how incompetent she is and the Tories, well they’re so out of touch with the public that no wonder this country has become the laughing stock of the world.

And all of this non-stop Brexit must be constipating the hell out of the Queen, but what do the royal palace believe is going to happen, a revolution? Do they really believe that people will descend on the palace with pitchforks and canons like the French revolution? Britain is far too mild and reverent to do anything so brazen.

Although I think that they’ve overlooked the emergency scaffolding they’ll need across the entirety of the United Kingdom because it’s looking like Brexit is going to cause the sky to fall in, and of course, we should all make sure that the elite are provided for first.

It seems like the rich and mighty don’t appear to have to suffer the same adverse outcomes as everyone else in terms of civil unrest. She could always go and live with David Cameron, he’s rather apt at disappearing, but then they’re rather good at squirrelling away plenty of everything they need, and can stealthily ship anything else they want.

Monty Python couldn’t make this crap up, the Queen in danger from her own parliament’s choices, and her own people, well, perhaps the people might want to lynch her, after all, she knows everything that goes on, she’s not entirely blameless in all of this.

And why does everyone think that it’s terrible that the royal family is so thwarted by this, and surely the issue should be getting better attention to circumvent such a disturbance? All this talk about Brexit, but nobody appears to give a hoot about homelessness, and what about the Queen’s summer holidays because of course, she doesn’t have to apply for a passport or visa, she automatically gets one anyhow.

Perhaps she simply needs a bowel evacuation because look at the messes she’s presided over smilingly, while her country is being transformed into a toilet bowl, but Brexit is like divorce, of course, you can always get up and leave your spouse, but if you really want to divorce, you still have to go through all of the paperwork and have the courts distribute your assets if you can’t agree, and that can prove somewhat costly.

Unethical Firms

188172728.jpg.gallery.jpg

Human rights violations, arms deals and use of child labour are merely some of the allegations that surfaced at companies backed by a £7 billion pension fund designed for local government workers in Essex, and the Essex Pension Fun is one of the biggest local government pension schemes in the United Kingdom making investments on behalf of thousands of workers including council workers, teachers and charity workers.

But an inquiry has disclosed the fund is supporting some companies cited of immoral practices.

tata-power_660_061316120632_091416094003.jpgThe fund includes £24.7 million in Tata Consultancy and £5.9 million in Tata Power. Both are subsidiaries of an Indian multinational corporation called the Tata Group, which claimed in September last year of providing military transportations to Myanmar.

The statement was made only four days before the United Nations (UN) cited the country’s military leaders of the “gravest” atrocities against ethnic groups, including genocide. Tata Group was contacted for comment.

BAE-Systems-feat.jpg

Around £600,000 has further been invested in BAE Systems. The British company provides fighter planes to Saudi Arabia which may have been used in Yemen, and the UN warned the bombardment has created the worst famine in the world in 100 years and BAE’s chairman has told shareholders he does not know if the company’s products were used in war atrocities.

BAE Systems provides defence equipment, training and support under government-to-government agreements between the United Kingdom and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. As an international company, BAE Systems has operations in many countries, and that it complies with all appropriate export control requirements and regulations in the nations in which it operates.

141598365.jpg

Other investments include £560,341 in Glencore, previously cited of using child labour in mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, but a spokesperson for the company called the claims entirely without merit, and that they prioritise regard for human rights everywhere that they operate, and that they uphold the human rights of their people and their communities, including vulnerable groups such as women, children, native people and victims of conflict.

w3qcoghnyxxmwwb1extx.jpg

An extra £155,316 had further been invested in British American Tobacco, and numerous observers would point at our history of delivering regular returns to shareholders as a basis on why our shares are deemed attractive, and a pension fund for the public sector workers rejected concerns about immoral investment, maintaining that their purpose was to secure the highest return.

But the principal duty of the Essex Pension Fund is to guarantee that it has adequate reserves free to pay pensions on behalf of more than 160,000 people, including workers at councils, schools, colleges, universities and the fire and rescue service.

However, do people really care about where they’re pension pots are invested? Perhaps not, as long as it makes them money, they don’t actually think about whether it’s going to fossil fuels, the arms trade or any other ethical deal, they work laboriously, earn it and spend it on what they want.

Most people don’t care about anyone else, as long as they’re alright, and as a pensioner, they obviously want the best possible return because it’s no good having emotional awareness and a small pension.

The only thing that matters is profit, and that’s profit at any price, but what should matter is your pensions, those pensions you’ve paid into for years, and of course, you don’t want some meddlesome troublemaker striving to diminish its value.

Councils should establish a criterion and guarantee that the Essex Pension Fund is invested positively and ethically because pension funds exist to provide a safe haven for pension savings and a good return.

They’re not there to make a statement, political or virtuous, and some people might get a warm blushing glow from a small pension, knowing that it was invested ethically or in keeping with the latest virtue signalling fad, but most people wouldn’t agree with this.

And when we’re discussing public money, councillors need to be clear and precise about its use or where it’s invested.

Juden!

bagel-640x400.jpg

Vandalism was discovered one morning on a Bagelstein store in the 4th District of Paris where the word “Juden!” was spray painted in yellow across the window of a bagel store in Paris.

An anti-Semitic tag in the heart of Paris, well that’s one too many for me, and it’s like the most terrible lessons in antiquity no longer illuminate our consciences.

The French League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism displayed a photo of the store graffiti beside a photo of a Berlin store that was marked in a comparable way in 1938 Nazi Germany, and on the day the graffiti was discovered, hooligans spraypainted more than 20 swastikas on sites across Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia, but the people of Bondi and indeed all Australian’s of goodwill stood together in rebuking the hateful display.

Sadly, Hitler is not dead, and he exists in many people’s lives! And this is the famous district of the capital city where thousands of men, women and children were rounded up by colluding with French police and German soldiers throughout the Second World War.

Many had to don yellow stars distinguishing their religion, and their businesses were ‘marked’ with the word Jew before they were taken to their deaths in concentration camps, and we should do everything to make sure that these perpetrators of this abuse are prosecuted, and we should not let anything pass.

This is intensified deliberate destruction and incitement to racial hostility, and Far-Right parties in France including the National Rally which used to be called the National Front have a chronicle of anti-Semitism, and their members are frequently sentenced for offences including Holocaust denial, and those perpetrators of the assault were among those who were nostalgic for the Third Reich.

Some 67,000 French, Polish and German Jews were exiled from Paris between June 1942 and July 1944. They were dehumanised not only by the Nazis, but by French police and paramilitaries, and then herded on wagons belonging to SNCF, France’s national railway.

It’s only in current years that the French has started to acknowledge the role they executed in the Holocaust, and it was as recently as 1995 that the then conservative president Jacques Chirac eventually publically declared that French police and other authority figures had served to arrest 13,152 Jews on two days, July 16 and 17 1942 in Paris.

They included more than 4,000 children, and all were held at the so-called Vel d’Hiv cycle stadium before being taken to camps such as Auschwitz, and yes, French people, the French nation did help the occupier in its unlawful derangement, and this is the nastiest anti-Semitism on the streets of the city of light.

But despite years of government attempts to combat it, they’re pretty far from having ended anti-Semitism, but there was a particular concern because overall, the anti-Semitic act had been on a slump in recent years, and now each offence against one of the nation’s citizens, because he or she is Jewish, resonates like broken glass.

This is pretty distressing because why do some people have to be antagonists? Perhaps the Jews of France should have put a tag next to it where they put “Juden”, someone should have come along and put, “And proud of it.”

Chimpanzee’s Spine

 

shutterstock_264973217.jpg

spine-model3.png

Most people get problems with their spine, particularly as they get older, some from wear and tear and other people for many other reasons, but have you ever considered why? Well, people with lower back problems are more inclined to have a spine similar in shape to the chimpanzee, our closest ape relatives.

And there is a lesion which develops in the disc within the bones of the spine that is the reason for its differing shape, and it would have caused the vertebrae to change as humans evolved from using four legs to two legs, and now researchers say that their findings could assist doctors to predict who may be at risk of back problems.

 

file-20180627-112641-idgmo2.jpg

The vertebrae of chimpanzees, orangutans and ancient human skeletons were examined to investigate the connection between the shapes of the bones of the vertebrae, perpendicular movement and the health of the human spine, and evidently, they provide helpful insights into our ancestor’s health and lifestyles.

The skeletons further provided data about how humans evolved to move on two “rear” legs, and the findings revealed that the vertebrae of humans with disc problems were familiar in appearance to those of our closest ape relatives, the chimpanzee, than are the vertebrae of humans without disc problems.

The study picked up that these individuals have a lesion described as a Schmorl’s node, a small hernia which can happen in the disc between the vertebrae, and even though there’s not one explanation for the node, it’s believed to be associated to stress and strain on the lower back.

 

Evolution-L-180-1-e1527674795879.jpgEvolution is not perfect, so over several thousands of years humans have not all adapted in the same way, and it suggests that the pathological vertebrae of some people may be less well adapted for walking upright.

 

800px-Humanchimpchromosomes.png

But human and chimp genes may have divided 13 million years ago, more than twice as long ago as had been generally believed, and it has further been found that male chimps pass on far more genetic mutations to their offspring than male humans do, showing earlier unknown evolutionary differentiation between the species.

Chimpanzees are the nearest living relations to humans, so studying chimps could assist scientists to learn more about human development.

The amount of genetic differentiation between two species shows how closely related the species are, and by calculating the rate at which those variations happen, researchers can then determine when the ancestors of species such as humans and chimpanzees may have diverged.

Chimpanzees usually have one more thoracic, one less lumbar vertebra, and one less caudal vertebra than do humans. Both usually have seven cervical vertebrae and usually, the combined thoracic, lumbar, and sacral regions consist of 22 vertebrae, and chimpanzees lack the acute curves of the human column, and the angle between the lumbar and sacral area is more acute.

But the actual enigma for the evolutionist is not to explain the species of organism that have actually ever existed, the actual problem is for the evolutionist is how is it that most classes of potential and apparently reasonable organisms have never existed.

The dilemma is to explain the location of the void spaces in the clustered assembly of occupied points. It’s easy to describe organisms that have never existed. There are snakes that live in grass, but there is no grass eating snakes. Birds rest on trees, yet, apart from a few exceptions, they don’t all eat the greenery around them, but rather consume a vast abundance of energy hunting for food.

But if you suffer from lower back pain, your vertebrae might closely resemble that of our nearest ape relative, the chimpanzee.

Our vertebrae have discs of cartilage between the vertebrae, which allow our spines a measure of pliancy, and further, play a significant role as shock absorbers when we move around and do anything that’s high impact. But sometimes these discs can shift, or become herniated. This means a small lesion opens up in the fibrous outer layer of the disc, and the inner viscous hub is able to move out of place, either moving horizontally or vertically, into the bone.

These lesions, further known as Schmorl’s nodes, can result in some pretty severe back pain, but how and why they occur isn’t very well understood, and it’s been suggested that the shape of someone’s vertebrae could be directly linked to their probability of developing Schmorl’s nodes.

And because humans exhibit considerably more degenerative and traumatic spinal pain than non-human primates, many research groups have hypothesised that the cause of this usually debilitating damage might be associated to the way we move around, on two feet.

And with this hypothesis in mind researchers have led a cross-species study of spine shapes, looking at medieval period human skeletons, matching them with the bones of chimpanzees and orangutans.

The aim was to examine the relationship between the shapes of the bones making up the spines of each species and their means of movement, in order to understand that disc lesions are more prone to affect people with spine shapes closely resembling those of our ape ancestors.

As humans evolved, our vertebrae slowly morphed into shapes that can better handle the pressure of walking erect, but, as researchers pointed out, our vertebral shape is almost certainly determined by multiple genes. This suggests that within the human species, some individuals can be expected to have vertebrae that are closer in appearance to those of our common ancestor than others.

 

1402990939.jpg

It further suggests that those people are less adapted for bipedalism (using two legs for walking), and after analysing the skeletons, researchers discovered that healthy vertebrae were distinct in each species, but unhealthy vertebrae in humans, those afflicted with Schmorl’s nodes, were statistically indistinguishable from those of chimpanzees.

This suggests they more closely resembled the chimp vertebrae than the healthy human spines, and the conclusions showed that the vertebrae of humans with disc problems were closer in appearance to those of our closest ape relative, the chimpanzee, than are the vertebrae of humans without disc problems, and that the pathological vertebrae of some people are well less adapted for walking upright.

I honestly couldn’t envision us all walking about on all fours, but then I did say that it was a truly bad thing us coming out of the trees!

Warzone Paris – Paris In Flames

unnamed.jpg

Teargas and baton ammunition were adopted by fired-up riot cops on a so-called ‘Act XVIII’ Day of Rage created by the intrepid Yellow Vest movement as strife broke out on the Champs Elysee, the most prestigious avenue in the under-siege city, by 11 am, where there had now been 25 seizures.

Demonstrators targeted symbols of the luxury industry, stores including labels like Hugo Boss and Lacoste, where they destroyed, looted and torched, and an opulent restaurant called Fouquet’s, long connected with politicians and celebrities was also trashed and set aflame by the rampaging crowds who promptly turned Paris into a warzone.

A vehicle ignited outside the luxury boutique Kenzo, one of the numerous fires on and around the famed Champs Elysees. The violence kicked off when protestors hurled smoke bombs and other things at police along the famed avenue scene of repeated past rioting and they began hammering on the windows of a police van. Riot police then withdrew, with demonstrators booting the side of a large truck screaming that Macron should resign.

Gangs were targeting police and carrying out infinite acts of vandalism. Fires were being lit, including vehicles, and thousands of people were appearing all over the city, with the police already extremely stretched.

2019-03-16t124012z_1857179455_rc1974fa3c30_rtrmadp_3_france-protests_0.jpg

Protests were not only organised by the Yellow Vests, who are identified after their high visibility motoring jackets, but also by climate change protestors, and all were endeavouring to close in on the Elysee Palace, Macron’s official home, but were held back by barriers and rows of police.

There were 7,000-8,000 demonstrators in Paris on Saturday of which 1,500 were ultra-violent ones that were there to destroy things, but pushing a hard line, Castaner ordered police to retaliate against these unacceptable acts, rebuking those who call for disorder and that was there to ferment chaos in Paris.

About 12 members of the Yellow Vest movement have died in the blockades that were established at the major roads around France, while hundreds of others were wounded in the rioting.

The Vest had been protesting since November 17 last year, and despite a series of concessions by Macron including scrapping green taxes of diesel and petrol, there was still a continued call for him to step down.

Many were detained, including some 700 who were held in custody on a single day in Paris last December, and mounted police, water cannons, and 14 armoured vehicles competent of spreading high-intensity gas were all on standby as part of the security operation, yet they failed to stop extensive turmoil over the past few weekends, with the worst brutality coming at night, with the Vests being joined by fanatics from the far Right and the ultra-Left, as well as insurgents hell-bent on creating as much destruction as possible.

But crisis-ridden Mr Macron has not only climbed down on forcing green taxes, but raised the national minimum wage by seven per cent, and scrapped taxes on bonuses, but the Yellow Vests said their objections would continue indefinitely as they fight for even more concessions.

Just blame it on Brexit, everyone else does because this is precisely what you get when governments disregard the very people they’re supposed to serve, whether they agree with them or not they’re still only delegates there to carry out the people’s wishes and that is a fact! And it’s coming to the UK shortly.

But it’s just like us Brits to lie back and watch the government destroy our country. At least these people are taking a stand! But this country is heading the same way because there has never been a worse example of anti-democracy that’s been shown in parliament over Brexit, and whichever way people voted, you actually do have to recognise the deception and dishonesty of the speaker and the Prime Minister, and their lack of loyalty to the electorate is shocking.

Universal Credit Dad-Of-Three Tried To Kill Himself

 

SEI_45872180-69a2.jpg

A dad who was driven to desperation by Universal Credit tried to kill himself while on the telephone to the DWP after he was denied payment for 10 weeks.

Dean Lovell-Payne, 52, who was disabled by a fall, took a large overdose in September 2018 after having to endure approximately three months without getting any benefits at all. Presently Dean, his partner Paula and their three children Andrew, 30, Lou, 17, and Phoebe, 15, have been made to move into a house in the woods on the outskirts of Bournemouth which is only obtainable by a dirt road, meaning that wheelchair-bound Dean is completely housebound.

Despite appealing to the Universal Credit helpline, following a 10-week payment delay Dean said he believed he had no alternative but to take his own life during the call as he believed his life insurance would pay out more swiftly.

Funnily enough, he got his benefits the same day after police were thought to have alerted the DWP to the incident, yet they made him wait all that time before swiftly paying him out because he’d tried to take his own life just so that they didn’t look unsympathetic.

The former ambulance worker, from Poole, Dorset, said that each and every day is horrible, and he realised things were utterly hopeless and that his life insurance would be more inclined to pay out in time to support his family than by Universal Credit, and he thought that it was his only choice to end his family from its misery, so he took an overdose.

He didn’t even hang up the telephone and he told the cruel monsters at the DWP precisely what he was doing, and it seemed like the only way his family would be saved and no longer suffering, the only end to the hardship and instability.

The next thing he knew the police and ambulance had arrived, but the only reason he survived the overdose was that he had a tolerance to the painkillers and sleeping tablets that he’d taken, which was more luck than judgement.

And even though he’s the same person, he’s now apprehensive, nervous and mistrusting of anyone in the benefits system, and even though he survived it, he doesn’t see much of a future for himself.

Dean has been on benefits since 2011 after he developed sepsis and global nerve and joint pain following an operation, but despite his health improving and being able to work part-time with the ambulance service, he suffered a major fall and consequent infection in June which prevented him from walking.

He was forced to move to a cheaper home, after which Dean applied for Universal Credit the same month, but their current home, which is a converted motel in secluded woods outside Bournemouth near Ringwood, Dorset is totally inadequate for him and his family to live in.

The access to the house is shocking, it’s only gravel paths and sometimes he feels like a hostage there, and the house is freezing in the winter. Half the month they don’t have any heating because they can’t afford to heat the house, and after going through the mandatory checks, Dean was told that he would have to wait five weeks for the payment to be processed.

He maintains that the delay of 10 weeks in total meant he and Paula came close to being forced to put their children into care and meant that they extinguished any little savings the couple had, but five weeks came and went, and they waited and waited and they were reaching crisis time.

Their money had long since run out and the end of the school holidays meant the knock-on effect of no Universal Credit was going to bite, and without confirmed Universal Credit they couldn’t get their children to school, and couldn’t sort out their free school meals or feed them at home.

They also had letters from council tax demanding money, and they couldn’t get any prescriptions either, and all of their standing orders were set to bounce within days.

The only security net he had left for his family was his life insurance, and even though Dean survived the overdose, his life has not improved, and he struggles to get out of bed in the morning to take his daughter to school, and then get back into bed.

Dean has worked all of his life, but now he’s being made to feel worthless, simply because he’s too ill to work, and he feels helpless, and there doesn’t appear to be anywhere to turn.

Paula is Dean’s full-time carer and has to carry him to the car every day so that he can drive his daughter to school, but he doesn’t know from one day to the next if they can get their daughter to school or not.

He wants to provide for his family but he can’t, and Paula sees Dean struggle every day and it’s terrifying for her, and she feels like a failure as a mother because they can’t do the stuff for their children that they’re supposed to do.

The DWP stated that they sympathise with the distress Mr Lovell-Payne felt, but as far as they’re concerned Jobcentre staff managed his claim with sensitivity and in line with their duty of care, and that the Universal Credit payment was made as soon as Mr Lovell-Payne’s claim had been properly established.

The Universal Credit system needs to be examined by proficient thinkers because this is affecting people’s lives psychologically, physically and emotionally, and this is ethically incorrect, and the DWP has ruined countless genuine people’s lives.

Of course, there are scammers out there that know the system inside out, they know what boxes to tick and what answers to give, this is why genuinely sick people who have worked always get the worst treatment.

It was never about fraud, it was all about conserving money by any means possible, and if people died along the way it wouldn’t be any skin off their nose as far as the DWP is concerned, a few more deaths simply means that they save a little more money.

There will be some people out there maintaining that insurance companies don’t pay out if someone commits suicide, but there’s a number of companies that do pay out for suicide, and suicide prevention in the United Kingdom has been credited for the current slump in the number of suicides, but sadly, it’s still pretty much a daily occurrence.

Over the past 3 years, there has been a drop in the number of suicides, but that doesn’t suggest it’s a problem that can be disregarded. In 2016, 4,941 people in the United Kingdom committed suicide, with the number of men being three times greater than that of women, that said, female suicide rates are higher than they have been in a decade.

And losing a loved one not only brings heartache as they strive to interpret their thinking, but it can further present severe financial hardships to a loved one and their family, and it’s a popular misconception that life insurance doesn’t pay out if the cause of death was suicide, this is just not the case, but it’s also not that simple.

It’s all in the policy’s small print, and there are several clauses drafted into a life insurance policy that decides whether or not a payout is issued.

The suicide clause is the period of time following the commencement of the policy in which a payout will not be made if the event of death is suicide, and this clause exists to protect the insurer and is intended to prevent vulnerable people from committing suicide, for the purpose of obtaining a payout.

However, on occasions, if suicide is committed inside a period stated by the suicide clause, insurers will reimburse the premiums which have been paid to date. Therefore, even if suicide was committed during the suicide clause period, it’s still important to communicate with the insurer.

The suicide clause, in summary, describes the time period at the beginning of the policy in which if suicide is committed, a payout will not be made. The clause is typically 2 years, but can occasionally be 12 months, depending on the insurer.

After this period, a full payout is likely to be issued, even if the cause of death is suicide, and the clause normally restarts if an existing life insurance policy is replaced with a new one.

This man did work until his injury, and we shouldn’t knock any genuine sick person but of course, there are scammers out there that make us question some of the real ones, and at the end of the day Universal Credit is destroying people, and it needs scrapping.

It’s a shame, but the DWP do have to follow a process, and there’s nothing that the other person on the other side of the telephone can do, and even if an MP steps in, they can only go so fast, and listening to suicide calls is not part of their job description.

Sadly, what isn’t part of that process is hurrying up the process, in fact it’s likely to dawdle it slightly as they attempt to make sense of the new information coming in and how it affects benefits, and these people on the other end of the telephone aren’t callous, and they don’t have the choices that people believe they do, and those people that do make these decisions can’t be directly contacted by the public.

Even the decision makers can only do so much and they have to follow the law and administration that the Home Secretary has set out, they can’t deviate.

We understand that people need help, but lately, the government have been useless at providing help, because the Tories perpetually use a divide and destroy strategy when it comes to benefits, making out that all those getting benefits are scroungers, well they’re not!

This guy and his family are entitled to these benefits, and we should all be considering how this would affect our lives if we were in his situation, and after paying into a system for numerous years and contributing to society as an ambulance worker, don’t you think this man deserves to be supported by the welfare system 101 per cent, unlike EU nationals claiming child tax credit for children they may or may not have in another country?

However, we have a host of rabid Tories, killing those in need of assistance, but this is what they’re entitled to by law, but instead, they’re simply punishing those people in need.

Yet again here is a perfect example of the government not looking after their own, but they spend millions of pounds on less important things, yet our country has no money to support the ones that require it.

Austerity when it suits the government, same old crap, different day, and we should quit condemning him and others like him because everyone would do the same if suddenly they fell sick or were disabled and helpless to fend for themselves.

And those people out there that are happy to rebuke the unemployed or people that are seriously disabled, don’t say that you wouldn’t claim a penny from so-called hardworking taxpayers, and if he is getting as much as some people that are working, don’t you think that shows you that the wage system is antiquated and that taxpayers are being short-changed?

If someone on benefits requires that amount to live on and still struggles, then rather than reprimanding them, people should stand up, and demand more wages. The government lie to the public every day and the people put up with it, choosing to take their disappointments out on people like this man and his family.

Remember this man has already paid into the system, unlike many others who never have but make benefits a lifestyle alternative. The problem is the Tories have demonised all benefit claimants as parasites, which implies that the worthy are suffering because of a tiny number of offenders.

This man was driven to desperation, and if anyone believes it was a ploy to make a buck, which appears to be the case, then maybe people need to re-evaluate how much of a totally idiotic idea this is, putting a gamble against your favour with your life would be, considering that perhaps he’d get some free money if he took his own life.

Now consider for the briefest moment, this guy and his family get a place, not by choice because look there’s no social housing, but the outgoings were just too much because being without support for ten weeks is going to make someone do drastic stuff, yet there’s a lot of people who are willing to talk down about him as if he should be ashamed, but there’s a lot of people who are capable of working 50 hours a week, but then they have their limbs, they’re not broken, and they’re not disabled.

1200px-NHS-Logo.svg.png

He further worked for the NHS, so people should really be thankful for their good health because anyone could find themselves in his situation. Not only that, in England and Wales, it’s an offence to cause harassment, fear or suffering under the Public Order Act 1986.

This carries a £1,000 fine or a penalty notice of £80, and if the crime was perpetrated with intent to cause harassment, fear or suffering, the wrongdoer can be given 6 months jail time or a fine.

This shameful repugnant government has to go, and Universal Credit is evil. Does anyone actually believe that it takes 5-6 weeks in this age of computing to sort out a claim? And why do they make the forms so complicated? They actually don’t need to make them so difficult, after all, there will never be enough jobs to go around anyhow in an island of 68 million people, so we need to quit buying nukes, end foreign aid, and let other nations take their share.

As long as people and poor people keep voting, and keep voting for their perceived betters our lives will be rubbish, and all strides made to make the ordinary person’s life civilised and more comfortable will be succeeded by 19th-century cruel means-tested procedures.

The level of deprivation we see now will be nothing compared to what it will be if the government keep on with their grand scheme of de-regulation and economic duality, and don’t think it can’t happen, it can, and it will if people keep voting these vile people into seats of authority.

We need a government with a social conscience, and we need it thirty years ago, but people choose Tory because they believe it makes them better than the rest of us, but the system won’t be right until it works for everyone, and that includes people on the streets.

Universal Credit is just not fit for purpose, and we should all feel for this guy who was a hard worker, but fell on hard times but was treated in such a disturbing way. Everyone that works pays National Insurance to make sure they’re covered should something like this happen, and it’s utterly shameful.

Our biggest opponent by far this society has is the working class Tory voter, who has immortalised this scandal but still can’t see how exploited they are, and it’s a scandal quite frankly, and our government are taking us back to Victorian standards.

skynews-theresa-may-downing-street_4608545.jpg

How Theresa May can sleep at night knowing that people have to use food banks to survive is beyond me. She takes from the poorest with one hand and plates it out to her wealthy mates with the other, true evil!

Universal Credit is going to cause serious harm and injury to thousands and people are never going to be able to get themselves out of debt, and the Tories either know this and are hoping for mass suicides or they just don’t give a damn.

Jobcentre workers get bonus payments for sanctioning claimants and have fixed targets per month, and people who attempt to challenge workers at the Jobcentre, or suggest that they have caused them to become suicidal are considered hostile and possibly violent on their record, and this world that we now live in really is cursed!

This Could Save Lives

1_2-Pod.jpg

Sleeping pods for displaced people in Newport have been praised as an emergency lifeline for rough sleepers and welcomed by residents across the capital.

Charity Amazing Grace Spaces first unveiled the pods in October 2018, having recorded a rise in the number of rough sleepers in many cities. The charity arranged for two pods to be sited in the city centre after a businessman gave consent for them to be located on land at the rear of his site.

The pods which cost between five to six thousand pounds each were currently occupied by two rough sleepers, who had access to a bed, light, toilet and phone charger, and the Newport residents have embraced the arrival of the pods, with one rough sleeper stating that the project had stopped him committing crime just to have access to a warm prison cell.

This is excellent work from the charity and those who have served to make it possible, and anything that benefits people without a home can only be a good thing, and it gives an emergency lifeline to rough sleepers, and rather than fight the cold, they can now be inside one of these great pods.

There are far too many homeless people out there, and if homeless people are using these pods, then they must be working, and this could save lives.

Let’s pray that they work because there shouldn’t be anyone in 21st century Britain who is homeless, and let’s hope that these pods can turn people’s lives around. However, one person expressed his reservations, saying that he didn’t think that it would make a difference.

These pods supposedly only give interim settlement, so how will this all work in the long run? Of course, rough sleepers require help but will it actually work and to what degree? And there is the off chance that they might get vandalised.

But rough sleepers need the right help, integrated support and mental health triage needed with more supervised emergency accommodation. But of course, the concern of this person should be noted, but we must also have more compassion for the homeless, and maybe we can find suitable places for these pods or similar.

It would be nice to see some wasteland that has been fenced up and unused finally put to some use, maybe build a bit of a community for the homeless with shower blocks, and they should be put first in regards to providing homes for them so that they can be put back into society and to help them find help with alcohol or drug abuse et cetera.

And even though this is all quite well-meaning, we shouldn’t be condemning these people to ghettos when there’s enough land to build houses and enough investment out there to do so.

The pods are a very good idea, but not on a permanent basis because then we would end up with ghettos for the homeless. The money has to come from somewhere to build these houses, and there are families out there with children that are presently in dire straights as these rough sleepers who should have a preference.

This is a well-intentioned but perhaps flawed in thinking, and perhaps it might only be a matter of time before a body is found inside one of these pods because there is a drugs problem with some of the homeless, but these pods should be part of the solution, not part of the problem.

This is a homeless problem, and giving people someplace to stay, even just for a night is helping a few, or if these pods take off, then more than a few, and it might not be addressing the cause but at least it’s putting a roof over their heads and out of the cold so that they don’t die on the streets.

It’s not the case of funding their addictions, it’s the fact that these are human beings, and whether they have a problem is irrelevant, they warrant the same reverence as your next door neighbour, which we wouldn’t think twice about doing, but a tramp on the streets, well now, that’s another story.

It’s not only drug users that end up on the street homeless, homelessness is created by a mixture of circumstances, both structural, for example, the benefits system, employment rates, and the housing market, and individual addiction problems, mental health, family breakdown and past trauma, and these pods might be a sticking plaster but at least they will benefit a few people a great deal.

We should be very impressed with the work that this Newport charity do and we should feel especially proud of them because they’re doing their bit for the city. Of course, the pods won’t save the plight of homelessness, and the pods aren’t supposed to be a long term thing, but it does give a human being hope for one more night, and that’s how we can transform the world with a bit of hope and progress at a time.

We know that social difficulties like homelessness need a more complex solution for the long-haul, but launching our hands up on the air and saying that it’s pointless, we miss the chance that we have at this moment to do the little things because we’re not powerless to do something, and something is better than nothing, RIGHT?

Each one of us is able to help someone, somehow, right now, at this moment, and if we don’t use that power, we lose it. So, consider for one second and think about the tiny gift of assistance you can give in your life, from holding a door open for someone who’s trying to catch a train, and then reflect on the impact it would have had on that person.

Now, examine the impact a pod could have in saving a life, and perhaps one of those rough sleepers will cross your path and transform your life in some tiny or vast way that you could never have foreseen, and we should never discourage anyone from putting their time, strength and heart into something that can improve the environment that we live in.

Childcare Payments Are Stopping Parents From Working

ImageVaultHandler.aspx.jpg

A new report from the mighty Work and Pensions Committee shows the governments Universal Credit policy is preventing people from returning to work, and the way that childcare payments are paid in Universal Credit directly clashes with the Government’s principal aim for the policy, getting more people into work.

One of the government’s principal selling features for the scheme is that it will see a further 200,000 people back into work, so that would suggest that the UK’s workforce will contribute over 100,000 million additional hours every year under the new benefits scheme.

However, its success or downfall in accomplishing these aims depends mostly on working parents, and if the government had set out to create a policy to make it more difficult for parents to get into work, it could hardly have done better than this one.

It’s not only pushing parents into desperation and debt and creating difficulties for childcare providers, but it’s further actively serving to prevent the Government from obtaining its own aim of getting more people into work.

And it is totally irresponsible of the Government to imply that the way around this policy’s inherent problems is for struggling, striving parents to take on more debt, and this about more than employment numbers.

Good quality childcare enhances a child’s life prospects and that enhances our society and our economy, and if the government doesn’t sort this out, Universal Credit childcare support will work against all that good, as well as against the objectives of Universal Credit itself.

Universal Credit claimants must pay for childcare up-front and claim recompense from the Department after the childcare has been given. This can leave families waiting weeks or even months to be paid back, and many households will end up being in precarious financial positions.

Too many will face a stark decision, turn down a job offer, or get themselves into debt to DWP, or to friends, family or other loan providers in order to pay for childcare, but the department said that its approach in reimbursing childcare costs under Universal Credit is designed to lessen rates and high rates of fraud and failure in the legacy policy, but prioritising this goal has built a wall to employment that will be unconquerable for some families.

The Tories have misled the people and continue to lie, it’s like they believe that being poor, further means that people are ignorant, and the report says that their own policy works against the very thing they’re claiming for, a higher employment rate, and it’s blatantly apparent that Universal Credit has pushed many into actual poverty.

The entire thing is drivel, they say that they guarantee you an interview, and they preach this openly, but numerous disabled people have nothing to contribute, and that’s not an onus on them, and numerous work coaches are quite honest by telling people that they have barely any funding because it was cut by the government.

The DWP have silly expectations of employers taking on people with disabilities, which need workplace modifications and support et cetera, but it’s really difficult to determine disability discrimination on this subject because the employer can simply say that they didn’t meet all the guidelines.

There are numerous disabled people who want to work, but sadly many doors are closed with barriers in the way, far more than a person who’s not disabled, but that’s merely the tip of the iceberg, wait till we come out of the EU, then you’ll see the complete picture of what Hell looks like.

Universal Credit is an unmitigated catastrophe and has destroyed countless lives already, with numerous families that work full time and have lost their homes as they couldn’t afford the rent because it was a choice between keeping their homes or paying out for childcare instead, and if they hadn’t of paid for childcare, they would have lost their jobs.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started