THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Extinction Rebellion Protester Climbs Big Ben

An Extinction Rebellion demonstrator clothed as Boris Johnson soared the scaffolding on the Elizabeth Tower after Westminster Bridge was blocked off following an unconnected suspicious package fear.

The man, identified by the movement as Ben Atkinson, wore a wig and green trousers as he escalated up the outside of the iconic tower, usually referred to by the name of its huge bell, Big Ben.

He unfolded a banner which read ‘no pride on a dear planet’ in LGBT rainbow and waved at the crowds beneath and a second banner read ‘Citizens Assembly’, one of the group’s three principal demands.

The man was resting on a safety net outside the tower as police and contractors discussed if the mesh could hold his weight.

Specialist police climbers started their climb up the tower at approximately 4.15 pm and a spokesperson for the group said the climber was a 43-year-old tree surgeon and as he stood tens of metres above the street, he posted on Facebook: “Gone and done it… Extinction Rebellion. Here to stay.

“We got the declaration of climate emergency last time. Now perhaps, please Boris, you’re struggling to navigate Brexit let alone work your way out of the sixth mass extinction event.

“Please. Pretty please…. let’s get on with the citizen’s assembly. Thank’s Boris.

“I know somewhere in there you have compassionate feelings towards something other than your career. You’ve got Premiership.

“Now you’ve got a chance to do something that could last for centuries. A legacy of being the man that turned it all around. Dare you.

“Oh, and thanks, Greta. I heard you calling.”

Another Extinction Rebellion demonstrator said he had no idea that another activist was going to ascend Big Ben and Harry who didn’t want to give his last name said: “We all come from different circles but are all part of Extinction Rebellion.”

“We don’t want to bring down the system, we want to shake them enough to get some action.”

The police started removing people from the road underneath the tower shortly before 4 pm and at about 4 pm police had cut through the netting around the scaffolding that separated them from the outer safety net where the man was.

They proceeded to put ropes around him to make sure he was secure between pacing around the red safety net which hung heavily under his weight, the man lay down with his blond wig trailing over the side.

Two ambulances and two police vans appeared a few minutes after 4 pm at the bottom of the tower inside Parliament, as emergency services prepared their attempt to apprehend the climber and at approximately 4.30 pm the climber had moved from the net to a large metal girder, where he sat looking out at the metropolis and eventually at about 7 pm Mr Atkinson was removed from the tower.

Police officers used a lift connected to a scaffolding to bring the protester to the ground and at least six people were seen accompanying him to his descent and as the lift reached the floor, a gathering of supporters applauded from behind a fence encircling the Palace of Westminster.

But there is one simple question to all of this, are we the taxpayers supposed to pay for the damage caused, the special hoist, two ambulances and the countless cops?

These rebels need to learn that climate change is a natural phenomenon according to a shock report which launched a spanner in the works of those who maintain that global warming is a consequence of man-made activity.

Because apparently, global temperatures would have still increased without the industrial revolution, basically dismissing the claim that man is responsible for climate change.

Most scientists will state that climate change is caused by an increase of CO2 being ploughed into the environment thanks to the industrial revolution but Dr Marohasy along with fellow scientist Dr John Abbot state this hypothesis was based on a model which was decided almost 120 years ago.

That model, mustered up by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius who was deemed to be one of the godfathers of physical chemistry, claimed carbon dioxide absorbs infrared radiation.

And while the fact that carbon dioxide absorbs infrared radiation is not disputed, there is an argument that it’s not correlated correctly to a heating globe and limited work has been done in the following century to update this model.

But to accurately examine the impact of CO2 in the environment data was obtained which offered ways to measure temperatures over the last 2,000 years such as tree rings and coral cores.

Dr Marohasy and Dr Abbot issued a paper in the journal GeoResJ describing their study of climate change using neural network technology and they fed this information into a machine learning neural network which gave prediction models of temperatures for the last two millennia if there was not extra CO2.

The computer predicted temperatures which almost exactly matched what global temperatures have been, even if there wasn’t an industrial revolution. They further discovered the world was warmer throughout Medieval times.

Dr Marohasy recorded in her blog there would have further been a spike in temperatures from 1983-2012, something which scientist have indeed observed and in reference to her study published in GeoResJ, Dr Marohasy wrote in her blog: “The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates warming of approximately 1°C, but attributes this all to industrialisation.”

To be clear, while mainstream climate science is replete with published proxy temperature studies noting that temperatures have cycled up and down over the last 2,000 years, spiking throughout the Medieval Warm Period and then again recently to about 1980, the official IPCC reconstructions, which underpin the Paris Accord revoke such cycles.

And through this denial, leaders from within this much-revered community can maintain that there is something unusual about prevailing temperatures and that we have catastrophic global warming from industrialisation.

Dr Marohasy, whose long list of credentials include setting up The Climate Modelling Laboratory and director of the Australian Environment Foundation until 2008, brutally concludes that science is far from settled.

Nevertheless, Nasa, for one, has repeatedly asserted that global warming is a consequence of human activity, saying that there’s a 95 per cent likelihood that it’s caused by man.

And Nasa’s Global Climate Change Office has said: “The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century. Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by Nasa.

“There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.”

They will never acknowledge that it’s a natural phenomenon and they deliberately use data from tree rings, known to be incorrect in modern times to justify their ideological agenda.

And you must have heard the expression, ‘genius is next to madness’, and even worse, the topic of climate change is now so polarised, some see it as a form of religion and we have become climate priests.

And we have soaked up all the stories and misinformation spat out by these so-called green lobbyists and we should forget about global warming and simply be thankful that the next ice age hasn’t begun yet because governments always want you to fear something and this is it.

And if someone can demonstrate to me how the last ice age ended and the planet began warming up again, I might consider global warming because it couldn’t have been caused by humans, we weren’t here yet. Yet every country in the world has taken millions of pounds in taxes to prevent something which is merely a natural phenomenon, so will they compensate us, I suspect not.

So, this is a natural phenomenon, who knew it, well, well. So, now all the taxes can be lifted and the yearly IPCC yearly bunfest, which was only for those who believed anyway, a little like a Vatican conference.

The BBC will have to update its propaganda programming, and what will these school teachers teach these children now, it’s going to be difficult to find a suitable replacement.

And it seems that man-made global warming and climate change is a huge deception put out there by governments and entrepreneurs so that they can obtain more cash from the people.

Of course, some of the problems in global warming are due to humans but researchers wouldn’t admit that most are due to a natural phenomenon because that would mean that researchers into global warming would lose their funding and support and would be doubted.

But of course, global warming is profitable and climate change is big business particularly when hit by severe weather and the United Kingdom is now one of the global leaders in this industry and this market for climate adaption and as the world’s climate fluctuates, Britain appears to have more expertise in such fields with weather forecasting, flood modelling, infrastructure and insurance which has now come to the forefront to prepare us for these kinds of events.

And our agriculture proceeds to innovate, using advanced breeding techniques to produce new crops that can flourish even when the weather appears to be against us with genetic engineering which has the potential to make further crop improvements.

With instances of floods that have destroyed Thailand and this has been a high-value business opportunity which is extensively promoted but this global warming is a business opportunity and now governments are encouraging companies on how to turn a profit from something most people view as a serious peril to our collective well being and too many companies are making huge amounts of money at the expense of the poorest people on the planet.

Climate change is a natural phenomenon but typically, the government has to put a tax on it and this is particularly profitable in the wrong hands.

Five hundred million years ago carbon dioxide concentration was 20 times greater than today, reducing to 4-5 times throughout the Jurassic era and then gradually decreasing with a particularly speedy decline occurring 49 million years ago.

But carbon dioxide diffuses in the ocean to form carbonic acid (H2CO3), bicarbonate (HCO3) and carbonate (CO32 and there’s about fifty times as much carbon dissolved in the oceans as exists in the atmosphere and the ocean serves as an enormous carbon sink which has taken up about a third of CO2 emitted by human activity.

Most people already know that global warming is a natural phenomenon but it’s the elite that is continually striving to intimidate us and maintain its existence.

Global warming is something which has been occurring frequently, in a cyclical time scale, since our Earth developed its atmosphere but what’s troubling is what comes next.

Climate change is one of the biggest globalist con tricks to ever be played out on the people, not only is it extremely profitable for the elites but it’s one of the main tools to bring in Agenda 21.

The light finally dawns on the scientific community. The climate has changed, sometimes suddenly and sometimes more gradually ever since there has been a climate. Whatever next? Boris Johnson making sense possibly, unlikely, but you never know.

But there are too many fingers in the £1.5 trillion estimated Green industry to make this con go away and for every climate report that says it’s all-natural these swindlers have ten fully paid up shill scientists saying it’s man-made.

To think all those highly paid people have not only wasted years of time and money they’ve told lies around the world so that we could be taxed to the bone but if you frighten people enough you can charge them unimaginable amounts of money.

The Economistalists will tell you that they can show scientifically that the more CO2 there is the warmer it gets, you can further claim that scientifically the more ice cream people eat leads to more shark attacks and that figures confirm this scientifically.

Of course, this is simply a coincidence of figures and one doesn’t mean that one is the cause of the other just like CO2. It merely suggests that when the weather is hotter more people eat ice cream and that when it’s warmer more people swim in the sea, leaving them more inclined to be attacked by a shark.

You will further notice that they never tell you the amount of CO2 there is in our atmosphere and is that because it’s so preposterously small to bring about the Armageddon they predict.

This is not going to please the global warmists because it tends to make them look ridiculous. It’s not going to please the climate scientists because their distorted reports are how they make their living.

It’s not going to please governments because they need some excuse for all their green tax and carbon tax and any other tax that they claim is saving our planet. So, on the whole, they will continue to dismiss anything other than it’s man-made.

Of course, this is of no surprise, the world is chock-full of fluffy people who are seriously seeking to save the planet. The dilemma is they’ve only been on the planet for a nanosecond and their studies extend for a few nanoseconds and we’re here dealing with something on a galactic scale and nanosecond science is of little value.

But the government would never admit to us that they’re fleecing us from every angle as long as it makes them money and puts more laws and sanctions on what we can and can’t do, they will carry on with this lie.

Of course, these foolish antics will not reap much support but no matter what we think of these rebellion tactics, we also don’t want the police to have powers to shoot harmless nonviolent demonstrators.

But what people should be protesting against is austerity because austerity kills people because this government doesn’t care about the people.

DWP Universal Credit: 700 Suspected Errors

More than 700 suspected errors in Universal Credit have been flagged in 18 months by a single town hall.

Labour-run Tower Hamlets started collecting the figures in April 2018 over concerns the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) was not dealing robustly enough with problems.

Since then the deprived London borough’s officers have reported 728 incidents to the DWP, identifying £335,000 in alleged overpayments and £215,000 in underpayments and officials claimed some cases took months and numerous attempts to contact the DWP before they were solved.

The roll-out of Universal Credit should be stopped because it’s failing our most vulnerable residents and pushing them into hardship and it’s just not good enough that these errors continue and these ongoing mistakes that we’re seeing due to Universal Credit show that it’s not fit for purpose.

And it’s impossible for residents to budget when they’re being constantly underpaid or suddenly slapped with a bill for overpayments and cases reported by Tower Hamlets included a single parent in temporary accommodation, who waited eight months for payment because of a dispute between the council and the DWP over who was liable for paying them.

In another case, the DWP handed more than £5,000 to a claimant after it took three months to settle a dispute about their housing and child costs in Universal Credit and other cases led to people being paid too much in benefits.

Tower Hamlets officials alleged they told the DWP four times about someone who was being paid Universal Credit and housing benefit at the same time and by the time the problem was settled five months later, the claimant had been overpaid by £12,000.

In another case, officers identified what they alleged was a contrived tenancy between family members, but it took four notifications and £18,000 overpayments before the DWP stopped the right element of housing benefit.

Tower Hamlets stated it had identified 578 mistakes in cases in 2018/19 and despite the council going public about the first set this spring, 150 additional alleged mistakes were identified up to September, making 728 in total since the work started.

Not all cases are documented errors or received as mistakes by the DWP, as they were settled in different ways without a constant paper trail and a DWP spokesperson said that there were approximately 17,000 people getting Universal Credit in Tower Hamlets and more than 2 million across the United Kingdom in total and that they continue to give the best possible support to every single claimant and that if an error is made on someone’s benefit payment, their staff work to settle the issue as soon as possible, well, clearly not!

And how much longer do we have to drag this pustule along? It’s failing and everyone knows it, but the Tories refuse to accept it, even though it’s dicing with good people’s lives.

And it beggars belief why they don’t just scrap Universal Credit and go back to the old system because even that has to be more effective but it appears that admitting they’re wrong is something abhorrent to the prevailing government but maybe a few more Universal Credit induced suicides and impoverished families will be needed before they truly pull their heads out of the sand.

Experts Slap Down Jacob Rees-Mogg

Experts have cast doubt on Jacob Rees-Mogg’s claim he is saving the planet by driving a gas-guzzling 1936 Bentley.

The Commons Leader claimed he was enormously environmentally friendly by driving the 83-year-old, 3.5-litre engine artefact instead of getting a new motor.

The Tory toff owns two Bentleys, a 1936 model he drives around 1,000 miles a year, and a 1968 Bentley T1 he claims can run on the motorway and he stated that his oldest car is 1936 so all that carbon was done a long, long time ago and that running them is less than the carbon inputs to create them, so he’s enormously environmentally friendly by driving old Bentleys.

But emissions expert stated that while Mr Rees-Mogg makes a valid argument about keeping old cars, the 1936 Bentley can expect to emit one tonne of CO2 per year, so in the long run, the least harmful option is to upgrade it.

Nick Molden of Emissions Analytics said Mr Rees- Mogg’s claims further disregard damaging pollutants like carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and total hydrocarbons that contribute to killer air.

The problem with both Bentleys is they will not have emissions control systems and consequently, the emissions may be orders of magnitude higher than newer vehicles. Hence, replacing the Bentleys with a new vehicle would be more suitable for air quality.

And from a carbon perspective, keeping an older car in use isn’t a terrible idea, particularly if you only drive 1,000 miles a year but it’s really bad for air quality because old cars have no emissions control equipment.

The most useful thing Mr Rees-Mogg could do if he’s intent on being green would be to change his 1936 Bentley to an electric vehicle, in the same way, that Prince Harry converted his classic Jaguar E type.

For people who aren’t able to afford the expense of a Bentley but need a vehicle, changing to an electric vehicle is the greenest option, and because electric vehicles are so much more efficient and it’s more affordable over the life of the vehicle too.

Buckinghamshire-based Emissions Analytics claims to be a leading independent firm test ‘real world’ vehicle emissions and founder and chief executive Mr Molden said trading up to a new luxury car would release approximately 10 tonnes of CO2 in the production line and he claimed this would be wiped out by lower C02 emissions once it’s on the road.

Mr Molden estimated the 1936 Bentleys emissions based on Mr Rees-Mogg’s assertion that he drives it 1,000 miles a year, and an assumption it achieves about 10-13 mpg. By those calculations, he said, the old car could expect to emit about 1kg of CO2 per mile compared to 0.4kg per mile for a new vehicle.

Taking the Bentley off the road would, therefore, save approximately 600kg of C02 per year, meaning over a 25 year period it would be more desirable for the environment.

The Tory minister purchased his 1968 Bentley at the age of 23 and has confirmed it broke down all the time, including a brake failure on the M4 and he said in 2016 it was on first name terms with the AA relay.

The only proper description of Rees-Mogg is a dumbbell because he has no idea at all of what the 21 century is about and is intellectually ensnared in a time warp and he would love nothing better than to be able to Lord it over everyone else.

And to think, this noodle is in the cabinet, mind you, he now has a great partner in crime in Boris Johnson, the arch fool, another throwback to another world and this guy clearly has issues and his car is far more modern than what he is, having said that, so is Tutankhamen’s chariot.

This guy belongs in the turn of the 19th century when people still used monocles and spouted ‘rule Britannia’ because he’s simply a deluded toff, with the rich man at his table and the poor man at the gate.

Rees-Mogg chats so much defecation and if he truly wants to go green, perhaps he should walk everywhere? But then perhaps we should lay off the moggy because the man does have a touch of style and old world class, hey, I just found a suit like his in a charity shop and I got it altered and started wearing it in town and it’s become a bit of a talking point, I honestly can’t afford the motor though.

But just remember this guy is a kind of Dickensian monstrosity and he’d have your children back up his chimneys and your grandmother in a workhouse if he could when actually he belongs in a museum display cabinet.

Anti-Brexit Group Ploughs Massive Remain Message

A large anti-Brexit message has been ploughed into a field in Wiltshire.

Campaign group Led By Donkeys ploughed the words ‘Britain Now Wants To Remain’ in 40 metre high letters, visible from flying aircraft.

The move was timed to correspond with the build-up to Saturday’s People’s Vote march in London and the deciding majority in Parliament on the Prime Minister’s deal.

Led By Donkeys released a film of the message shot from a helicopter, with a voiceover by ex-Leaver Lisa Dodd, who said that she voted because of the NHS and she couldn’t believe that she fell for it and that she was manipulated, well and truly and there are countless more like her out there.

People have said to her that approximately 17.4 million people voted for this and that’s what they want, well, she’s one of those 17.4 million and that’s not what she wants and she wants her vote back.

And amid the drama in Brussels and Westminster, they’re losing vision of a simple, fundamental fact, this country doesn’t want to leave the European Union and a YouGov study of 300 polls revealed the preponderance of Britons would now vote to stay in the European Union and Boris Johnson may have a deal but that doesn’t mean he has the support of the people.

David Lewis of Manor Farm, Water Eaton, Swindon, where the protest message has been ploughed, stated that Brexit would be just awful for farming and that so many farmers chose Leave but have since realised they were had.

He also said that it gave him real pride to see this huge message ploughed out in his field and that he hopes the people in London get to see it because this country has changed its mind.

Of course, there will be numerous people also saying that they still want to leave and there will be a lot of childish name-callings but we must also accept that we all have our own personal opinions and whichever side you’re on, we must recognise that we might not all agree with one another and it’s clearly a pretty divisive subject and some people need to grow up.

Brexit: Court Rejects Bid

An attempt to obtain a hearing to make Boris Johnson obey MP’s demands that he delay Brexit if Parliament rejects his deal has been denied.

Civil right’s group Liberty’s application for an urgent hearing was rejected by the Court of Appeal, despite fears and Boris Johnson will cause irreversible damage if he declines to follow the law and the Prime Minister has vowed to flout a law which would require him to demand a Brexit extension if parliament failed to approve a deal by Saturday, Oct 19, blocking out a no-deal Brexit.

Members of Parliament will vote on Boris Johnson’s recently secured deal but he’s declared he would sooner die in a ditch than call for more time from Brussels.

The organisation’s request for an expedited hearing was previously denied by Mr Justice Supperstone, a High Court judge, following consideration of the court papers and speaking following the bid was turned down Martha Spurrier, Liberty director said that the fight continues because our democracy is at stake and the Prime Minister has proved that he believes he can take measures which could undermine the law.

No one is above the law and Liberty will stop at nothing to hold the Government to account.

The request was rejected by the Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett, Master of the Rolls Sir Terence Etherton and President of the Queen’s Bench Division Dame Victoria Sharp and Lord Burnett said: “It is clear to us that Mr Justice Supperstone made no error of principle or acted outside the proper limit of his judicial discretion in making the case management decision under challenge.

“We will give our full reasons in due course in writing.”

And Civil Rights group Liberty, who started the application, said it was neutral on the issue of Brexit, but not on the Prime Minister following the law.

Before the hearing, Liberty’s Martha Spurrier stated: “This case is about ensuring that the Government, whoever it is, or whatever its intention, acts within the law.

“Any Government which defies Parliamentary process and law because it doesn’t serve their aims should be a cause of concern for everyone.”

The Court of Session in Edinburgh declined to give an order forcing the Prime Minister to obey the law after UK government’s lawyers informed the court the Prime Minister would write an extension letter if required by law and argued that a legally binding order was therefore not required.

Of course, this is Boris Johnson stamping his feet and we should put a vote back to the people, it’s the only way and we’re all knowledgeable of what we’re voting for now, unlike three years ago and all this blather is Theresa May’s reheated dog’s dinner.

Brexit Blow For Boris Johnson

Boris Johnson has been dealt a damaging Brexit blow after the DUP rejected his hopes for a deal.

The pound fell by 0.5 per cent after the Northern Irish party’s leader Arlene Foster announced a 6.45 am statement stating that she can’t support the Prime Minister’s proposal as it is.

That means that even if Boris Johnson settles a deal with the 27 EU leaders, it’s likely to be voted down in Parliament and discussions in Brussels will still be continuous before the two-day summit kicks off at 2 pm and the United Kingdom and EU have still not reached a deal and have still not issued a legal text of it despite missing a series of last-minute deadlines and reports suggested that aside from the DUP’s objections, EU and UK officials had virtually reached a draft deal with some notable problems on VAT.

Boris Johnson talked to European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and Mina Andreeva, the European Commission’s chief spokeswoman, tweeted: “Contacts between #EU and UK teams are continuing. Juncker EU just spoke to Boris Johnson. Every hour and minute counts before the #EUCO. We want a #deal.”

DUP leader Ms Foster said the sticking points were customs, consent and VAT rules and she is believed to be concerned about reports of a customs border down the Irish Sea, and a continuing dispute about whether EU VAT rates would apply in Northern Ireland.

Currently, there’s a system where firms pay domestic VAT in the same way as VAT on imports or exports between EU states but this would leave questions about how firms in Ireland and Northern Ireland are charged.

The DUP further fear plans to discuss the (collapsed and dormant) Stormont Assembly over any prospective deal that could leave them without a veto and they’re believed to want to double lock where both nationalists and unionists would have to approve a deal.

DUP chiefs had three face to face meetings with the Prime Minister in swift succession in a frantic attempt to overcome the hurdles but Ms Foster and the DUP Westminster leader Nigel Dodds stated that as things stood they couldn’t support what was being proposed on customs and consent issues and there was a lack of clarity on VAT and that they would continue to work with the Government to seek and get a reasonable deal that works for Northern Ireland and that preserves the economic and constitutional integrity of the United Kingdom.

Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick said the government wanted to work through the DUP’s concerns and that the Prime Minister and his team were in intensive discussions with all parties, including DUP and that they want to provide adequate support for the DUP and unionists in Northern Ireland to feel that the arrangements they would put in place with this deal were sufficient to give them comfort to support it.

Boris Johnson likened Brexit to climbing Everest and escaping Shawshank in a bullish address to MPs that lasted only eight minutes and the Prime Minister told Tory MPs: “If you’ll excuse a mountaineering metaphor, we are at the Hillary Step and the summit, you can see but it’s shrouded in cloud. But we can see it and we will get there.”

And Boris Johnson insisted the United Kingdom would leave deal or no deal on October 31, despite the Brexit Secretary verifying he would ask for a delay by 11 pm on Saturday but then the Tory party is a two-legged disaster zone.

First, under David Cameron they had no majority and had to rely on the Lib Dems to prop them up, then David Cameron was so terrified of his own right-wing and frog faced Nigel Farage, so Cameron called a stupid and massively damaging referendum.

Then Theresa May again called another election and again had to go cap in hand to the NI Bigots party, along with a satchel full of taxpayers money.

She then painted herself into a corner with those ludicrous red lines and boasted she was going to be ‘That bloody difficult woman’ that ended in tears after three years of getting her deal rejected.

Now we have this arch clown Bojo doing political somersaults with the NI Bigots party pulling his strings and then people believe that the Tories are fit to preside over the United Kingdom, good grief, they have better monkeys in Monkeyworld.

But the political damage has been done inside the United Kingdom by the Tory party and it will take decades to recover from it and for what? So that a few mean-minded individuals could say that the United Kingdom had taken back power, yet they didn’t have a clue as to what power they lost in the first place, but the slogan sounded nice so they voted for it and this crew will be the first in line complaining when their investments go down the pan.

World Trade deal, don’t make me laugh. Donald Trump will defecate all over this country once we’re out of the EU.

Boris Johnson To Face Fresh Legal Challenge

Boris Johnson will face a new legal test even if he manages to bring a deal back from Brussels and lawyer Jolyon Maugham stated reports of what Boris Johnson’s deal would look like would violate domestic tax law.

Jolyon Maugham, whose been involved in successful, high profile cases that question the government over proposals to exit the European Union, said he plans to lodge a petition to stop the government putting the Withdrawal Agreement before parliament.

And on Wednesday Britain and the EU seemed on the brink of a last-minute Brexit deal but the Prime Minister still had work to do at home to ensure his government and unruly parliament support the plan.

Britain has suggested that tariffs would apply on goods crossing from mainland Britain to Northern Ireland if they were thought to be headed further to Ireland and the bloc’s single market, in a proposal to solve the complex Irish border problem but Maugham said he believed that such a deal would violate the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Act 2018.

The act states that it’s illegal for the government to enter into arrangements under which Northern Ireland forms part of a separate customs territory to Great Britain and Maugham was questioned whether any mooted Brexit deal would fall foul of the law, he stated that it was the belief and Maugham said that he expected to lodge a petition on Thursday and for it to be heard on Friday.

Maugham has challenged the government successfully on its decision to suspend parliament and on whether Britain could unilaterally change its mind about leaving the EU. He’s additionally involved in a case which attempts to force Boris Johnson to comply with a law to delay Brexit past October 31 if he fails to agree to a transition deal with the EU.

To be fair, it’s like a child’s playground and if a referendum does happen, it’s not going to ask Leave or Remain, it’s going to ask people if they support the Tories deal or not and it seems that Leavers are so fearful of a Referendum because deep down they’re frightened that those that did vote to Leave will vote to Remain the next time.

But Boris Johnson will push anything through now to save face and he needs to be stopped. He doesn’t care, he has lots of money, this is all about his bleeding ego and it appears that we’ve allowed propaganda to panic us into a frenzy.

We shouldn’t take Boris Johnson or anyone else at their word, people should be doing their own research and it additionally appears that Boris Johnson has no regard for the law.

DWP Tories Confronted In Parliament

Tory DWP ministers were confronted in the House of Commons with explicit photos of a man who was refused disability benefit.

The man was denied the crucial mobility element of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) despite having bones coming through his flesh as the Independent MP unfurled photos of the unidentified man’s gnarled hands and feet in an attempt to startle Tory ministers into action.

The identity of the man was not disclosed, other than he was a 60-year-old former church minister from Birkenhead, Wirral and no photos were given of his face but this man now risks losing his mobility car following the assessment.

This man struggles to walk and has had this underlying infirmity for 40 years which then caused rheumatoid arthritis and affects his hands and feet and he was diagnosed with an aggressive autoimmune disease in 1980 accompanied by bronchial asthma and there is no cure.

The joints on his hands and feet are secured into one position and he walks with two crutches and needs frequent rests to recover after walking small distances and he falls frequently and is unable to support himself during his falls.

He was recently awarded Personal Independence Payment after a reassessment and he was awarded full care but lost all his mobility component, which means he will lose his mobility car to get about which means he will end up being housebound.

PIP is paid to assist with daily costs of being disabled which come in two parts worth about £150 a week but one part is paid for mobility and the other part for daily living but the man was only granted the daily living element of PIP but not the separate mobility element when he was transferred from his former benefit of Disability Living Allowance (DLA).

And now only that if you’re a new claimant on Universal Credit you’ll be £180 a month worse off as a consequence of disability premiums not being accessible to them. This is in addition to a growing number of disabled people who are dying after being found fit for work or having been denied PIP.

This is clearly a war on the disabled and the lengths that PIP go to remove genuinely disabled peoples benefits and some people are being denied disability benefits even if they’ve had their legs amputated and this man obviously can’t work safely and the same applies for millions of others, yet they’re told that they can but it seems that the default setting is that everyone fails and then the mandatory reconsideration fails and then these people have to appeal and over 80 per cent win.

But the entire system makes you jump through hoops and as many hoops as possible with unnecessary delays even if people present substantive evidence which the Government know will cause anxiety and stress to these people who are already very sick in the hope that these people die before it even gets to appeal.

As far as the DWP are concerned if you can walk, then you don’t need any help but they’re so short-sighted and ridiculous because some people can walk a little but it causes them a lot of pain but the DWP aren’t interested in your pain and this will never end with mindless voters voting vermin into power.

And the poisonous language being used by the DWP saying that people are being given more money under PIP than under DLA and what about people on Universal Credit being pushed onto sanctions by these work coaches, and the attitude over the last decade has caused an antagonistic environment and then our Government wonder why.

This brutal system in Universal Credit and PIP is extremely damaging for many disabled people and the assessment process is often set to fail claimants in all ways because all these people want to do is make other people’s lives as miserable as possible and it’s time to admit that austerity is actually a policy to kill a significant part of the population – A holocaust!

Of course, there are stories like these in the newspapers every day but ATOS and Capita are both dishonest private company’s employed by the Government with which they’re a bonus, in fact, a rather healthy bonus for denying disabled people benefits.

Because our Government is paying these company’s to cut spending and they choose to sacrifice the sick and the disabled and the weakest and defenceless of our society but it’s time that we punish the Government and expose these reprobates behind this cruelty of the disabled because this is a barbaric system and it has to be abolished NOW!

And the Government are solely to blame because they use these said company’s and then they give them enormous bonuses and they’re actually the dregs of our society and they treat their employees just as bad and what is happening with Universal Credit is wrong because no child should go hungry and no one should be without essentials but then that’s the Tories for you, insidious monsters whose only purpose for getting out of bed in the morning is to torture the have nots.

These methods when you think about it were used for mass extermination in the Nazi death camps and they were used and developed against people with physical, emotional and intellectual disabilities and this again appears to be the attitudes toward people with disabilities and this is extremely disturbing and most people don’t realise that this is a cleansing process and this is horrific.

And this is insidious propaganda to distort people’s minds in supporting what they want, so not much has changed since World War II but this government hasn’t got the nerve to do it themselves, they use company’s who have no medical experience but then they don’t need any because it’s about saving money and then the DWP’s position is that they’re committed to supporting those in need. Adolph Hitler may have died but sadly, his concepts still live on.

And this story of this man in this article is bordering on cruelty and those in charge should hang their heads in shame and this is evidence that these evil murdering Tories are attempting to cull the population.

Believe it, people, that’s precisely what’s happening in our country and then they hide behind the DWP’s obvious wrongdoings.

We all have family members that are either disabled physically or mentally but these nasty conservatives are turning their collective backs on family members and most of the people of our country can’t cope with another term of Conservatives in power, so make sure you vote next time around because the next General Election will be the most crucial election in decades because we need to get these evil and cruel Conservatives out.

The sad part about the thousands of cases just like these in this article are being overlooked and ignored and when it comes to elections people are still content to vote for these wicked savage degenerates and when the run-up to the next election starts, Labour should compile a video and broadcast all the people who have suffered at the hands of this Government and the DWP, highlighting those who have died after being declared fit for work.

And if Labour got approval from all the poor souls who have died from either being unfairly cut off from benefits or wrongly sanctioned and made homeless it would unquestionably show the true colours of the cruel cuts, and of course, the hundreds of food banks that now exist.

Sadly, the poor will be used as pawns in the General Elections, but if it ends this mass austerity on the poorest in society, then it’s the proper thing to do, particularly when people are in hospital in a coma or are terminal cancer patients and they get found fit for work – This Government is an utter mess!

It doesn’t matter if you’re on Universal Credit or claiming benefits, as far as our Government are concerned you’re a burden on society and the Tories have got that propaganda engine well oiled to work against these poor souls in our society.

They use words like we are ‘committed’ and ‘force’ and ‘complex’ and it’s a language that’s been used and become commonplace and has seeped down into our society so that it’s accepted.

At the end of the day, anyone can become unwell or end up with a long term disability or lose a spouse and then the process begins and they become performing dogs for the Tories, saying that a disabled man is fit to work, but it’s merely the ramblings of Tory ministers that now truly sound like they’re the ones who are barking mad.

And it’s become pretty obvious that the system doesn’t work and not only does it not work, but it’s also killing people and this system is a disgrace and needs to be changed – Fast!

However, it’s working for the Tories, it’s working precisely as they planned it to do, so that they can cull people…

MEP Hits Back At Nigel Farage

An MEP has hit back at Nigel Farage after he branded her a “stuck up snob” in a blazing Brussels exchange.

Judith Bunting, the Lib Dem MEP for South England grew up in Peterborough and went to a state grammar school, on the other hand, Nigel Farage went to a prestigious independent boarding school costing approximately £15,000 a year.

Judith Bunting doesn’t hold any of this against Nigel Farage because it’s a free country but she stated that when it comes to being called stuck up and labelled a snob by a man whose life has been defined by privilege and affluence, she simply couldn’t hold back.

No doubt Nigel Farage feels he has the right to stand up and label Judith Bunting as condescending and stuck up because she dares to assert her views, despite her ordinary background and he may even feel justified in doing so.

But Nigel Farage has no right, no grounds and honestly no compunction in portraying Judith Bunting of being a snob.

The row broke out on the floor of the European Parliament when Judith Bunting accused Nigel Farage of supporting inaccurate facts in the run-up to the EU Referendum and where Nigel Farage called Judith Bunting a patronising stuck up snob.

Even though it was reported that the Brexit Party are sourcing official merchandise in Bangladesh and China, despite Nigel Farage promising to fight for British jobs for British people and while a £10 tee-shirt and a £24.99 hoodie are both made in Bangladesh, and where textile workers pocket as little as 39 pence an hour and a Brexit party cap costing £8 is manufactured in China.

At the end of the day, Nigel Farage helps Farage because he actually couldn’t care less about the working classes and he’s not fighting for the working classes because he’s divisive, dishonest, country denouncing riffraff who pulls every trick in the book to flout the people and proceeds to make money out of the Brexidiots because only very shallow people continue to support a man who apparently manipulated the markets on Referendum day.

And Nigel Farage is nothing but an egotistical pitiful gammon liar and most people are embarrassed by him, the country is floundering of him and he should shut up and go and live like Donald Trump’s wig groomer and his avatar is decidedly more intelligent and Nigel Farage is a fraud and merely a toff with no mandate and what colour dummy would he like to suck today to comfort himself?

Scotland Smacking Ban

Scotland has become the first country in the United Kingdom to ban smacking and the new law will effectively give children the same protection from assaults as adults and removes the defence of reasonable chastisement or justifiable assault.

Previously, this meant that parents could smack their child on the body but not on the head and now there are concerns that this new legislation could unnecessarily criminalise good parents.

Clearly, brutality against children is illegal, but, this is not the problem and it’s not foreseeable at all for parents what circumstances they might find themselves involved in when it comes to the criminal justice system because now there’s no discipline at all, it’s disappeared in our country.

Now we have soft courts, soft parents and chaos in schools, even turmoil in Parliament and children have become more disobedient and I see numerous posts about children defying their parents and making trouble at school et cetera.

And why is there such a pandemic of these conditions? Is it down to parenting techniques, diet or lack of authority? Or perhaps it’s because as all of the generations have disappeared, it’s now a generational thing, rather than an actual slipping of standards.

Having said that, I’ve seen a number of parents that are far too afraid to discipline their children and then the children are never shown the consequences of their behaviour and this makes a school’s job especially difficult to do when you have children starting school with zero boundaries or respect for the rules and being a teacher is now undoubtedly much harder than it was even 50 years ago.

But it’s not all to do with parenting because you might have two siblings who are raised in precisely the same way but have quite different personalities and children have many more rights than they did generations ago and the Government have prompted them to have a voice and an opinion, so it stands to reason that they will push those boundaries more.

And behaviour and condition are clearly getting worse and children are getting more unmanageable and there are many parents coming forward because they’re frustrated that they can’t manage their children and that they’re terrible at home.

Children now have poor manners, disdain for authority, they show disrespect for their elders and love chatter in place of exercise. They no longer stand when elders enter the room, they contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up their food and intimidate their teachers.

So, yes. Children are much more poorly behaved and society as a whole are much softer on children and a lot of them have no respect for adults and in school, they’re compensated for good behaviour.

But back in the day, we were punished for poor behaviour, along with detention and extra homework and lines when we were younger.

I would never have talked to my parents the way my children sometimes speak to me and there was none of this taking stuff away or the naughty step and it certainly doesn’t have an effect on their attitude and I would have ended up on my backside had I even raised my voice to my parents.

I had the highest respect for my parents and I had no problem that they used to slap me and it hurt so I made sure I didn’t repeat the transgression in a hurry.

At school, I got the cane, although it wasn’t something that occurred frequently because the threat of it was enough of a deterrent.

But it’s society as a whole that has evolved with kids now demanding everything and children getting given everything they want and never having to work for it.

Teenagers no longer seem to go out and get Saturday jobs or paper rounds and there have always been disobedient children and there always will be and even more so now because punishment and fear of reprisals have disappeared and police and teachers no longer get respect.

The problem is society’s response to children, that is different because gone are the days when a clip round the ear would have stopped poor behaviour in its tracks, well, until the next time when the kid would be more cautious in not getting caught, but now they’d be summoning the police to have the adult charged.

Children should be given more rigid discipline in and out of school because I can remember wishing a policeman good morning and I was taught to respect from a pretty early age and parents these days have a really bad habit of treating their children like little adults and now parents feel that they have no rights over their children, so they struggle to parent them.

I’ve heard many parents use the argument that they don’t feel that their children are theirs, but then I also neglected to mention ‘the Government’, and now there’s the threat of Social Services, which don’t get me wrong is an enormous improvement from say 30-40 years ago, because parents got away with murder, quite literally.

But sometimes because of the rules, it goes too far and some parents are vilified and they don’t deserve it just because they parent out of the social norm and now parents really fear disciplining their children because they don’t want to lose them or face any sort of questions, and who can blame them because 90 per cent of them are excellent parents, but sadly because of the 10 per cent it’s difficult for the Government and Social Services to trust that.

But it’s true that the Government have installed fear into parents and yes, of course, symptom spotting is important but do Social Services always act in the best interest of the child?

And is it only me but are more children today spoiled and undisciplined?

Well, it’s a well-known truth that a two-year-old child will throw tantrums sometimes and that adolescent males have hormones, but it does appear that things have gotten worse and when you go into a shop and see children not just throwing tantrums but shrieking at the top of their lungs for something that they want and amongst young men there appears to be a lot of disrespect for women and authority in general.

And now we’re living in the age of child psychology and freedom of attire and parents no longer want to scold their children due to the possibility they may be harming their ever so fragile minds leading to a lifetime of children blaming their parents for their problems.

Of course, you also have lazy parents who don’t feel compelled to discipline their children because it’s too much like hard work and young girls have always wanted to look more grown-up and at one time that was great because grown women dressed more conservatively.

However, these days that’s considered narrow-minded and women are showing more and more and wearing less and our young ladies and young men are now suffering for this and young girls are now dressing like streetwalkers when they go to school with boys seeing more skin than they should and young females, as well as older ones, don’t have any respect for themselves.

I’m not saying that she got what was coming to her because of the way she dressed but more often it’s the way that you dress that determines how much regard you have for yourself and these poor disillusioned young ladies are dressing the way they’re taught to dress without any real appreciation of what they’re wearing.

They understand they’re dressing suggestively but they don’t understand the meaning of it and we’re raising children without any real consequences to their actions in the younger years because there’s a lack of discipline and now children have no morals, principles, manners and simple consideration for others et cetera.

Kids just don’t have any respect and we have to blame the parents and society but then kids have more power over their parents and it’s scary to see what today’s youth is turning into, particularly when girls are permitted to dress like prostitutes and that’s eye candy for horny boys and men and they have adult bodies but childlike minds and that’s a scary combination.

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this: