THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

NHS Patients Too Scared To Protest!

Sick people in hospital are afraid they’ll be treated worse if they speak up about their problems with their care; as stated by the NHS Ombudsman.

In-patients who are afflicted by poor care in hospitals are being let down by a poisonous cocktail inside the health facilities; as claimed by the NHS Ombudsman.

It was claimed that patients were frequently too prettified to make a fuss in case they were given even more inferior medical care and, those that did speak up were faced with a culture of defensiveness from employees when they were merely searching for a reason.

Investigation found one woman who was worried about her mother, who wasn’t being cleaned, or being assisted to the bathroom, was told to put her complaint in writing. She was informed her letter would be answered inside 28 days, but the poor lady could have died in that amount of time.

Dame Julie Mellor is calling for changes so that more concerns are acted on without delay and, measures are taken prior to care being threatened. This would incorporate admission to a free patient guidance service, 24 hours a day and, for every patient to be given a senior person’s name as a first contact for any worries they may have.

It is as well, recommended that patient’s comments are measured regularly so that hospitals can deal with complaints administration to make the system better.

The NHS Ombudsman looks into grievances by people who believe they have been treated unfairly, or had appalling service and, its examination found that the NHS culture meant that those who suffer harm were frequently being refused a straightforward expression of regret.

Approximately half the people who thought about complaining did not and, a great deal were put off because they believed that the process would be too bureaucratic and, others were convinced that it would make no difference.

It was as well found that workers were unwilling to fully investigate complaints because they were frightened of challenging, or holding more senior figures responsible, or of being disciplined for their shortcomings.

This defensiveness is one of the most crucial things people need to defeat and, that it’s about reshaping the discrimination and, not about the course of action we need to take.

There is a complete necessity for an advice service to help patients, but until such time, the NHS seriously needs to look at complaints and learn from those complaints and, to change what’s wrong.

It’s in the interest of everybody who cares about the NHS, from patients, to doctors and nurses, that patients can put one’s trust in somebody when they make a complaint and, that it’s handled properly and meticulously.

There are issues with how hospitals deal with complaints and, that’s why we have a need to carry out inspections on the system and, look forward to the recommendations that are put forward in revising its organisation and, techniques.

Coalition’s Mandatory National IDs and Biometric Systems

I said it was coming and, here it is, the Biometrics System but what is biometrics and, can biometrics be advantageous to the human race, well the Coalition Party seem to believe so because they’ve presently made it obligatory.

Biometrics is the branch of knowledge of determining humans based on distinctive physical attributes and, the government are making use of biometrics, for example, to measure people in the use of biometric passport readers, for the implementation of law enforcement and, biometrics is extremely favoured between security specialists.

Biometrics is a quickly growing division of information technology and, its technologies are automated techniques and means for identification founded on biological behavioural traits of a person.

Biometric methods are becoming a significant gateway for information security systems and, as the UK Government begin to roll out mandatory Biometric Global ID Cards, these will track down and, store our details directly, wherever we go.

What’s the difference between scrapping identity cards, scrapping the National Identity Register and, scrapping the next creation of biometric passports?

At one level, scrapping identity cards is a reasonably inconsequential venture as the card is merely a bit of plastic with restricted functionality and, no web-enabled verification capabilities for card holders, so current information on safety checks for the card need visual and physical examination of the card and, potentially, phoning a telephone hotline to check that the card has not been reported as lost or stolen.

If you select not to have or replenish your passport, your particulars won’t be entered onto the National Identity Register.

Nevertheless, if you freely decide to put in an application for a passport or identity card, then you will automatically have your details enrolled on the National Identity Register and, the fact that you’re not forced to be issued with a plastic identity card does not divert you from that commitment and responsibilities associated with your National Identity Register record.

The Government has persistently insisted that identity cards will not be mandatory for UK nationals and, for nearly all people this is not what they understand when they hear identity cards will not be mandatory for them.

Compulsory National ID Cards will breach vital civil liberties and, increase the control of authorities to lessen your freedoms to those granted by the card.

The Snooper’s Charter never made it through the legislative process, yet the Secretary of State for the Home Department was asking how much her department currently pays, telephone companies, internet service providers and, others yearly for data storage.

The response supplied was a total estimated remittance to the communications industry for these intentions by the Home Office for just one year was £15 million and, in 2013 Edward Snowden’s leaks divulged that the GCHQ has admission to the transatlantic cables that transport the world’s communications and, is intercepting and processing billions of communications every day and sharing information with the US.

This includes recordings of telephone calls, the contents of email communication, archiving on social media sites and, the chronicle of an internet user’s access to websites and, all without the public’s knowledge and agreement.

The project Tempora has been in existence since the start of 2012 and, the leaks as well propose that the US authorities have comparable breath taking and undeviating admission to global communications by way of the world’s largest internet companies. This secretive programme is known as PRISM and reports strongly conveys that the UK also uses this data.

The Communication Capabilities Development Programme (CCDP) is an alliance enterprise to produce an ever-present widespread infiltration programme for the United Kingdom.

It would require the logging of each telephone call, email and text messages between each resident of the United Kingdom and, would record the actual contents of these emails and, is planned to expand beyond the domain of standard telecommunications media and, to log transmissions inside the social networking platforms such as Twitter and Facebook.

The right of expression and, freedom from disturbance are two sides of the same coin and, we need both for full involvement in a parliamentary society. Observation expertise that stops a person to continue to exist as nameless when producing or accessing data, both violate freedom from interference and has a suffocating impact on unencumbered expression.

Methods of identification that use mechanised identification of an individual’s face, fingerprints, or irises are gaining ground worldwide. Biometric ID methods are becoming more and more positioned at the international border checkpoints, by Governments trying to execute national ID schemes and, by the private sector agencies.

The Coalition have definitely altered the romance between citizen and state and, private experts have sounded the alarm that the national database would additionally escort us into a generation of ‘Big Brother’.

It appears that the Governments want to take a transparent dictatorship capacity using the doctrine of authorisation for fundamental freedoms and civil rights and, it’s nothing short of a dictatorship effort to catalogue the people and, no more than a Hitler Regime.

The Tackle And Battle Of The Re-Offender

Reoffending adults only happens because being put into prison for minor offences is an institution in itself and, provides conditioning for prisoners to be set free only to break the law once more, merely because they have been conditioned to do so, not by the prison itself, but by other detainee’s whom they’re associated with whilst in prison.

The solution is not to obstruct our prison system, but to rehabilitate these youngsters outside the prison system because prevention is better than cure.

The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson is giving nearly £2 million in money for an avant-garde project to confront adult reoffending, but what about teenagers who have been put into prison for minor offences?

For the most part, adults reoffending, will go on to reoffend because they’ve been in the system way too long, when something should have been put into place long before this.

It was said that Boris Johnson has given the money, making it sound like he personally put his money into this enterprise. Let’s get this straight, he doesn’t put any of his wealth into any enterprise, but there’s an £18 million kitty that the Mayor’s Office has for Policing and Crime that has been assigned to assist boroughs to tackle crime.

The programme will centre on neglected groups of criminals who serve short prison terms and, who presently receive no official post release help.

Of course, young offenders and adult offenders should have assistance after they depart from the prison establishment because if they don’t, it will only result in them to reoffend once more so that they can feed and clothe themselves, as well as their families because they can’t sustain themselves on fresh air alone.

There are numerous causes why people break the law in the first place and, it’s not that they go out there to specifically do any harm, but it may be because they have a learning disability and, can’t find work, or an employer that is prepared to take them on; consequently, they end up with extremely low self esteem, which in the long term has an effect on them and, their families, causing them to perpetrate an offence.

Each short term offender will be supplied with a key worker who will give uninterrupted assistance from sentencing, to their stay in prison and, through to their release and, the scheme target is to lessen re-conviction percentages for the detainee with a lesser sentence.

It sounds more like they’re going on vacation, rather than being sentenced because they have been declared a nuisance to the community because most of these sentences are because we can’t confront gangs, or lessen brutality against women and children and, anti social behaviour.

In spite of the fact, if we looked back to when things were different, brute force against women and children was an enormous problem, but it was swept under the rug, since a man was considered to be the man of the house and, if he gave his wife a good beating, or the children, it was acceptable behaviour.

Women put up with this type of behaviour previously because there was no such thing as Social Security and, if a women left with her children; she had nowhere to go, because in many cases these families would not put a roof over their heads because it was just something women were meant to put up with.

If a child was abused or sexually assaulted by a family member, then they were scolded for it and, it was said that they were telling a whopper, or it was believed that they were fibbing, perhaps to get attention, which was regularly not the case.

Anti social behaviour became additionally noticeable in the late 1990’s and, it unquestionably became troublesome when children were set free to do as they wanted because the government and Social Services asserted that it was against the law to reprimand your child, allowing children a free leadership and, to do what gratified them.

Pleasure in a child’s life was covered with anti social behaviour for numerous reasons. Punishment for children had been taken away and, children celebrated the sense of being able to do as they pleased and, it motivated them in being aware that their parents could do nothing about it because if they did, the child would then intimidate the parents by saying that they would telephone Social Services.

Children were striking out at their parents as well as friends, family and the general public and, as they done so, this set off a succession of occurrences that shadowed them.

How far do will we go before a parent has no rights over their own child because after all, women are only a cocoon for a living organism, a breeding ground for the embryonic foetus, up till such time it’s born, but as soon as that progeny is born, the government undeniably takes over.

Petty offenders are periodically and sporadically impelled by a network of circumstances. The majority of the time it’s not because they want to carry out the offence, it’s because circumstances force them to.

Of course, not every single circumstance is identical and, it would be unjust to tar everyone with the selfsame brush, which is more than often the case.

There is always a reason why someone does something, there is never not a cause, but what we have to look at, is that whatever the cause, it’s better to put a stop to it before it has grown to such an amount, that in the end, the person who’s life it’s intruded on has to be locked away.

Benefit Fraud – 10 Years In Jail

People who’ve carried out Benefit fraud in England and Wales could face lengthy jail terms of up to 10 years, following recently developed advice from the director of public prosecutions.

Its time for a strict attitude, considering the £1.9 billion annual cost of the lawbreaking to the country and, prosecutors are to think about charging under the Fraud Act, rather than Social Security Laws because of the scope of longer sentences.

The Prime minister’s spokesperson said he welcomed the move.

Adaptations signify welfare cheaters would be graded alongside offences such as money laundering and banking embezzlement.

In the past, benefit cheats were often charged under social security law, carrying a maximum prison term of seven years and, benefit cheats of less than £20,000 were automatically tried in magistrates court, which could only pass judgement for up to 12 months in prison for numerous illegal acts, but for a single violation, the maximum was six months.

This monetary doorway has been thrown out under the recently developed recommendations, so smaller judicial proceedings can be passed straight to crown courts for stricter sentencing.

Suspected persons can as well be charged under the Fraud Act, which carries the higher prison term of 10 years; as claimed by the Crown Prosecution Service.

We comprehend that Benefit Fraud is extremely serious, but there’s not enough space in prisons as it is. They’re overflowing and, while it’s agreed-upon that cheating the system should be illegal, where are all the prisons going to obtain the capacity for all these people that are carrying out the offences that the government state they are, or is it that ,in fact, there are not as many people doing the crime and, that the governments data is wrong, whether it be by error or intentionally.

Not only that, it would end up costing the government extra money to house a defrauding criminal, than it would to make them pay back the money they took in the first place, bearing in mind, they would have to feed them, clothes them and, make sure they stayed in good health. So, not only do we not have room in prisons, but the government don’t have the money to house them either.

A Feel Good Purchase

Consumers are ready to pay a premium for pesticide-free commodities, but the realities can mean you get little more than a psychological boost for your money.

Supermarkets in North America and Europe are spilling over with organically labelled fruit, vegetables, eggs and meats. More than 80 countries have pesticide-free guidelines and products and, carry one or more of the 200 emblems, trademarks and official documents that they claim that their commodities are organic.

But is the consumer in fact purchasing pesticide-free, the answers are murkier than you might believe? Ecolabels symbolise an ecological, moral, ingredient or sustainability assertion.

The US, Canada, the European Union and Japan have inclusive organic guidelines supervised by governments and, a number of countries have a 100% pesticide-free labels.

In the US, Department of Agriculture label has many levels, headed by the 100% classification USDA Organic seal. The US government as well permits the word organic on produce that include 95% pesticide-free ingredients.

Nevertheless, they could include monosodium glutamate, a flavour enhancing natural ingredient, or carrageenan, a seaweed content that thickens food.

Both ingredients are either considerably shunned, or consumers progressively favour local food above organic because they think that it poses physical risks, even though government experts have cleared them as absolutely safe, but how many times has someone proclaimed that something was safe and, then years afterward we discover that they were toxic all along.

A third category classifies produce with a minimum of 70% pesticide-free ingredients. They can be categorised, revealing to the consumer that they’re made with organic ingredients, but such a label carries no promise about what else may be in the product.

For instance, consumers who purchase a bag of popcorn labelled ‘made with organic corn’ may be startled to discover that their treat could have been processed using genetically altered canola or soybean oil.

Lastly, produce made with less than 70% of pesticide-free ingredients can’t be called organic, but can catalog single ingredients on the wrapping, containers or boxes.

So, how trustworthy are organic labels? For one, traditional and genetically adapted seeds are known to sometimes get mixed in with organic supplies.

Some organic labels are more meticulous than others. To earn the EU’s new pesticide-free label, farmers and processing plants must obey a stringent set of guidelines, including the stipulation that 95% of the product’s farmed ingredients have been organically created and validated as such.

As of 2012, by agreement and, in spite of their precise interpretations being different, the EU and the US acknowledge each other’s main organic seal of approval for the intention of promoting commerce.

That means meats, grains, cereals and wines and other produce being given pesticide-free documentation in one region can be offered for sale as organic in the other.

Of course, with the favourable outcome of promoting trade comes temptation and, organic manufacturing is not different from any other.

For the most part, deception has been irregular and, over time, there have no doubt been occasions of nervous farmers facing an insect infestation spraying an unapproved herbicide; or a hard pressed supplier mixing in conventional low cost eggs with more expensive pesticide-free ones.

But fraud has more precisely manoeuvred below the radar and, as trading has flourished and, the stakes have loomed and, calibration of deceit has expended.

This kind of manufacturing puts pressure on global agriculturalists to cultivate more to make up the difference and, in the developing world, that can mean burning forest into farmland, a method that discharges a huge amount of carbon dioxide into the air and, damages the water cycle and species that live in forests.

In other words, even though organic agriculture may necessitate the use of not so many manufactured pesticides, its wider impact can be environmentally difficult.

We’ve heard it all before!

Nick Clegg claimed that would he push to make sure no one on the lowest level of wages pays income tax if the Lib Dems are in government after the next election.

The thing that irritates me; is this, before an election all parties are doing battle and fighting their little hearts out; so that they can get control once more and, that’s what it’s all about.

Occasionally, you might get just one party who are up front about their idea’s and, will share them with the people and, they do what they said they would do, instead of doing it because they want to get the larger part of the votes to get voted in by influencing the people because they just don’t have enough weight to do it all by themselves.

Furthermore, they all appear to have this little ditty that they convince you to go along with. This party will do this and, that party will do that. This party is more superior than that party because this party are going to do something more advantageous than the other to make this nation a more fitting place to live.

We’ve heard it all before and, it almost always comes down to the reality that it’s a great big fat lie and, not one of them even comes near to doing or fulfilling what they said in the first place.

So, who do we vote for and, how will it impact on our lives next time, or are they all full of stagnant farts – I’m going to require a muffler for this one!

They all proclaim they’re committed as a party, but commitment is not what’s required here, it’s determination to do the correct thing, but if you’re going to be successful at this thing, one has to stop being so different and; if one can’t do that, then they must adapt.

Not just on the outside, you have to change on the inside and, we have to take risks, make mistakes. Occasionally it’s necessary not to be flawless, it’s necessary to do the wrong thing, but why, to learn from your mistakes.

We need to find out what’s real and, what’s not, to find out what you feel because human beings are dreadful messes. This is what’s known as an illogical world filled with human beings.

It’s not about being logical; it’s about following your heart and, that’s what we should all do because human beings have a heart and, in order to follow your heart, sometimes we must do the wrong thing.

Well, the Coalition Party have been doing the wrong thing since 11th May 2010, so they’ve had more than enough time to get it wrong and, to sort it all out and, get it right.

But how does one get freedom and, why would we want to be free when we have such a magnificent country to live in and, we have so much freedom here; until one is ordered to do something and, it may have been an extremely long time since anyone has in fact ordered us to do something, but we can be ordered to do something at any given time.

People ask people to do things all the time and, some would say it’s a request, not an order, but that’s not enough. If you study our history, dreadful wars have been fought where millions have died for one idea – freedom. And it appears that something that means so much to so many people is worth having.

We all have a right to be free, things become different, things always change and things move on, as it should be and, there are some of us that attempt to see the meaning of the things around us and, there must be a reason why we are as we are, but the thing is that we are no longer free.

The world is old and, it’s decomposing and, in the end it will come to an end, but while we live on this sphere, do we not want to be recognised for who we are, no more, no less. Not for praise, not for acceptance, but the straightforward veracity of that acknowledgement.

This is the primary drive to our way of life and, it must be attained because if it isn’t, we can’t die with self-respect.

We’re all remarkable human beings and, the government has a duty to help us become whatever we’re able to be and, what is right for a lot of people in a lot of situations isn’t suitable for everybody in every situation and, it would be conceited of them to presume that it is.

Devastating Town Hall Report Discloses Additional Danger To Disabled People Who Campaigned To Rescue Benefit Payments

An incriminating evaluation of government welfare procedures with regard to disabled people was presented to the Town Hall’s ruling Labour executive on Thursday.

It notified thousands of Islington residents who have wrongly had benefit taken off them by the controversial independent assessor ATOS, only to have it reinstated on appeal, will have to go through the procedure once more because of a further set of modifications.

Disability living allowance (DLA) is to be substituted for working age people by personal independence payments (PIP), meaning that all those on DLA will have to go through a further evaluation by ATOS.

The agency has been condemned for forming an opinion that people are fit to work, even though they have very bad disabilities.

Half of those previously refused disability benefits were wrongly evaluated to be able to work and, had their benefits reinstated on appeal. An amazing 85 per cent of appeals are victorious when people are counselled correctly and, by the right organisations.

People conveyed that ATOS tests were mechanised and aimed at taking people off benefits.

There are almost 8,000 Islington locals aged between 16 and 64 who will have their DLA end and, will be required to claim PIP.

PIP will require a medical evaluation by an ATOS medical person, but Disability Action in Islington raised it worries about the ability of many people to manage with the entitlement procedures for PIP.

Previous evaluation ATOS assessors did not look at the claimant that they were talking to, but at their computer screens and, in addition, the ATOS assessors did not appear to take into consideration the medical proof of the claimant’s General Practitioner, or of hospital specialists and, there was a sense that the ATOS assessors were simply going through a power driven process intended to take people off benefits.

In one instance, a claimant had 1,000 official documents substantiating their disability, but was still judged healthy enough to work. The person won their appeal but only just prior to their being due for their next evaluation.

The governments strategies are farcical and, they need to calm them down and, make them more practical.

It’s foolish to be taking people’s money and, in addition levy them more than they have coming in, knowing full well that they will not be capable of paying their rents, heating their homes and feeding their children, which means only one thing; that the governments sharp-witted idea’s have merely been put into position for one reason and, that is, to impose these disgraceful laws onto the low income and, to make them poverty stricken so that they can restrain them, making them into dog dirt.

In numbers:

12,670 – Number of those claiming a disability benefit
2,100 – Number of council tenants affected by bedroom tax
£45.71 – Average loss of weekly income due to rent cap
8,000 – Islington residents claiming DLA who will have PIP instead
15 – Children who had to leave a school because of rent caps

The powers that be are in charge of people with not so much as a trace of consideration for them. They have grown into a powerful reign, so much so, that it makes the Royal family look unimportant and, David Cameron and his Scrooge-like party have the capability of bringing everyone down because the ruling classes have become substantially too big for their boots and, presently need bringing down a peg or two before the situation this country is in becomes far worse and, England’s possibilities become a centrepiece in a history book.

MPs’ overheads increase to record amounts with more than one in four putting their family on the payroll

The inflation busting 10% increase totalled £9 million to the bill and, at the moment represents about a third of the whole cost of operating Parliament

The commons have a gravy train that’s going full steam ahead today as Commons inspectors divulged that Members of Parliament squandered a record £98.1 million of taxpayers money on employee costs and additional overheads last year.

Statistics were made available by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, which displays the huge majority of the most recent increase was down to large growth in workforce finances.

There were repeated calls for restraints on MPs putting relatives on the public payroll, at an entire cost of about £4 million.

About one in four Members of Parliament, encompassing four affluent Cabinet Ministers and fellow Tories who campaigned against the minimum wage, use constituents of their personal family at the taxpayers’ levy.

This policy was meant to have been prohibited as part of the improvements targeted at cleaning up Westminster in the wake of the expenses scandal but was retained following a backlist from politicians.

Instead it seems like they’re just trying to uplift their earnings to claim for second homes, travel, food and drink, office and alternative costs from the 650 Members of Parliament, of all the parties, added up to around £400,000 to £23.8 million.

So called payroll expenses, which cope with employees wages, taxes and pensions shot up from £8.7 million to £74.3 million. That was because staffing allowances were discreetly increased from £115,000 a year to £137,200 for MPs outside London and, from £115,000 to £144,000 for those in the city.

Members of Parliament as well dealt out £13,163 in bonuses and acknowledgement payments to 49 employees last year. That was up from the £8,104 paid out to 57 workers in the foregoing 12 months.

The MP who lay claim the most was Ian Paisley Junior, the Democratic Unionist who stands for North Antrim. His personal and office claims added up to £232,042.33, including £45,039.08 on travel and food.

Justice Secretary Chris Grayling and Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin both use their lady wives and, they’re rewarded between £35,000 and £39,999 and, the inventory goes on.

A further Cabinet minister, Lib Dem Scotland Secretary Michael Moore, also employs his spouse and, he paid her £15,000 to £19,999 the previous year.

Jennie Bone, famed by frequent statements in her husband Peter’s Commons talks, makes a stealing of between £45,000 and £49,999 following a pay increase as his office manager.

The Mirror disclosed earlier this year that I’m A Celeb star Nadine Dorries had flipped her employee allowance between daughters.

A sum of 10 MPs’ family members get more than £40,000 a year, well over the UKs national mediocre wages of £26,500.

Sir Alistair Graham, ex chairman of the Committee on Standards, said Members of Parliament should have said ‘yes’ to restrictions on employing family when the watchdog called for an embargo and, if they still wanted to keep it in the family then IPSA should take over the hiring and firing.

Lib Dem Deputy PM Nick Clegg was the most costly at £152,553.82 with £12,688.01 in personal overheads, incorporating £9,767.41 for accommodation and bills and £2,920.60 for travel and subsistence. His claims also comprised £145.50 for a TV licence and 5 first class train journeys.

The statistics were made available as Parliament broke up for the party conference season, precisely two weeks following that MPs came back from their lengthy summer break and, of course Members of Parliament have a significant job to do, representing their voters in Parliament, but like any operational place of work, they are required to keep these costs under control.

Furthermore, at a time when everybody is feeling such a financial squeeze, it’s inappropriate that MPs have given themselves a pay increase. If their voters haven’t been given a green light to do it, then how come the people that represent them are allowed to?

In the understanding of the former misuses of public sector funds, it’s crucial that these sorts of details are made known; so that the taxpayer can adjudicate for themselves whether their representatives are delivering value for money.

NHS trust instructed to warn landlords following a man taking his own life

Coroner advises social landlords are notified about vulnerable patients

A coroner has urged that a London Hospital trust passes on details about vulnerable patients to social landlords after a mentally ill social tenant committed suicide because he was being turned out of his home.

The gentleman, 44, was found dead in his home in April 2012 following the ouster from his home owned by Genesis Housing Association in North London after failing to pay his rent to the Housing Association.

The Coroner expressed that the man went back to the property and took his own life as a direct result of his being expelled from his home and, the consequence that the expulsion had on his mental health.

The gentleman was being given medical care by Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust for mental health matters that Genesis Housing Association were not aware of.

The coroner said he had sent out a ‘rule 43’ letter, which coroners can send out if they recognise a course of action that could stop similar future casualties, to the hospital trust’s chief executive.

The letter that was sent out in July of this year; proposes the introduction of an evaluation process to notify other agencies, comprising housing suppliers, that a patient is vulnerable.

The letter specified that consideration must be given in a questionnaire that may be filled in by the staff managing the evaluation and, that determines that a person is to be deemed vulnerable and, that it can be handed onto other agencies, such as those supplying housing.

Genesis Housing Association was informed that it didn’t play a part in the man taking his own life and, that the gentleman’s demise was a sad state of affairs.

Nevertheless, since then Genesis have put in place an assortment of measures, such as instructing employees on welfare reform and benefits advice, manifesting a team to assist people avoid declining into rent arrears, or where people are owing money, to help them prior to the situation becoming uncontrollable.

Nonetheless, it’s heart-rending that it takes someone’s demise so that we can then take a course of action and, put things into place to keep the vulnerable safe. A great deal of vulnerable people will not even read their mail because they can’t deal with the pressure that paying their rent brings about if they’re not on Housing Benefit.

Suicides like this have been going on since the Coalition government came into power and, it’s a disgrace on them. A lot of people have been self harming and, having nervous breakdowns because of this horrifying bedroom tax.

Had there been a system in place prior to this man killing himself we wouldn’t be talking about his death and, even though housing providers are at the moment teaching employees to be additionally suicide vigilant, it’s as well, putting a substantial pull on housing support staff, bearing in mind that the government has now made a vast quantity of them redundant; so that the ones that are left have a doubled workload for the same amount of money or less.

David Cameron ‘Left His Brain on the Train’

David Cameron left his official ministerial box on a train table while he was taking a trip to a marriage ceremony; as stated by reports.

However, Downing Street renounced that there was any security violation following a passenger taking a photograph of the well tattered red box, with the key in it, whilst the Prime Minister, who on one, occasion left his eight year old daughter Nancy at a pub, was in an additional section of the train.

It seems the red box was just sitting there and, anyone could have dashed off with it, had wanted to, but Downing Street maintained the box was not left unguarded; as the premier’s safety measures were there at all times.

The photograph was captured on Saturday as Mr Cameron, refreshed from the fraught G20 summit in Russia, took the train from King’s Cross, London, to York to be present at his sister in law’s marriage ceremony.

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this: