THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Edward Snowden And The Security State

Apart from the leaks themselves, Edward Snowden has revealed how the US government imposes confidentiality in the performance of spying on us.

Edward Snowden has given up nearly everything in his former pleasant life; so that we could know at least some of the way in which the US government is gathering information on us.

So, what will become of him, well, it’s doubtless that they will kill him, even though the current government has determined that it’s okay to kill US nationals unaccompanied by trial as long as they cite national self-defence, but Edward Snowden will front persistent pursuit and prosecution, for the foreseeable time ahead.

Edward Snowden is one of a long line of whistleblowers, notifying the US public about the NSA’s capabilities. The NSA has an unlimited hunger for scrutiny and, has come predominately unmoored from any notable omissions or boundaries, but it’s Edward Snowden’s disclosure that appears to have kicked off an important and extensive discussion about the suitable boundaries of the US government’s ability to surveillance its inhabitants.

What is it about Edward Snowden’s revelation that is so distinctive? It’s not the contents of the leak itself, for the details that Edward Snowden disclosed is reasonably small.

What made Edward Snowden’s revelation different and, exciting, was its uniqueness. By notifying the public, through the newspaper, of a particular program and, its widely used commercial targets like Facebook and Google, he has established that the security state that lives inside the United States continues to grow.

The spread of information from WikiLeaks and, the cyberpunk collective Anonymous has revealed that anonymity can be a powerful implement in going against government confidentiality.

Nevertheless, Snowden was aware, given his familiarity with the work of his past employers, that after disclosing the Prism document, he would be able to run, but not hide, but he did it anyhow.

State Of The Art Ripple Of Socialism

We must stop working with the exempt stock market solidarity set up by Margaret Thatcher because Britain is at the moment afflicted with the largest decrease in living standards since Queen Victoria was seated on the throne.

If political pressure isn’t the central issue of the day, in that case the whole political structure may as well disappear on the foundation of irrelevance and moral bankruptcy.

It would be simple, but incorrect, to put all the responsibility at the feet of the sinful Tories, however sinful they may be. The facts are that political pressure started six years prior to (the Siamese twins) David Cameron and Nick Clegg being attached at the hip.

But political pressure has currently been given refurbished power and extended continuation by the Tories take over of the monetary disaster.

As the Resolution Foundation has exposed is that one in five workers at present struggles far beneath the living wage: since 2009, the numbers have missiles from 3.4 million to 4.8 million.

On the eve of Cameron’s expectation of power, 18 per cent of women worked for less than the living wage, it’s now a quarter.

Almost four out of five jobs generated under this government, pay less than £7.95 an hour. These jobs are often unpredictable. There is at the moment a million strong army of zero hour contract workers, a restoration to an assumed bygone era when dockers would journey to the yard, sticking their heads in the air in the hopefulness they might get some work that day.

Wages are; on average, £1,500 a year lower than when the Tory-Lib Dem camarilla rocked into power and, inflation has inflated for essential items, penalising the impoverished.

Approximately a million children are assigned to be thrust into poverty by government policies, as stated by the Child Poverty Action Group.

For the first time since Berlin fell to the Allies, the following generation fronts being poorer than their parents and, the manifestations of political pressure are all around us.

We can merely hypothesise as to how monied executives decide to have fun with their 36 per cent increase in money making.

Predators have opulent easy pickings in David Cameron’s Britain and, a million families a month presently are contingent on legal loan sharks who are permitted to demand excessively high charges, often used to pay for food, heating, mortgages and rents.

Half a million people are dependent on food banks, whilst the Energy Bill Revolution campaign earlier this year established that almost a quarter of families had to decide between buying food or heating their homes.

Here’s to the seventh wealthiest nation in the world, whose poorest people strive to feed themselves. Politicians relentlessly deliver a sermon about work as the way out of deprivation, but most of Britain’s impoverished have to work for their poverty.

And even though political pressure strikes those at the bottom the hardest, the pandemic of sleepless nights over bills, rents and mortgages are devouring the lives of millions of Britons.

If Labour had a set of lionhearted plans to confront political pressures, it wouldn’t have left a huge vacuum filled with personality impelled gossip. As expected, the nonattendance of solutions has had even more catastrophic results, the underhanded, deplorable redirecting of rage at immigrants, public sector workers and, the unemployed people, anyone besides those accountable.

But such is the scale of the disaster that it requires fundamental answers, breaking with the free stock market consensus set up by Thatcher, a recently developed ripple of bread and butter socialism.

Britain’s psycho welfare system

Britain has a mad benefit structure and, it’s turning devoted young couples into fraudulent claimers because getting married or living together means they will have to take an extreme reduction in income.

So, instead of seeing there living standards take a nosedive, a lot of cohabitant couples on welfare are cheating the State by claiming to live at a different home.

Marriage is our most fundamental and, victorious establishment and, the government should be placing additional cash into assisting those that are married, but that doesn’t convey that they should, in addition reduce the money that single claimants get.

At this present time married couples get £112.55 a week; that means that single claimants get £15.42 more, that’s £801.84 a year. That may not give the appearance of being a lot, but it’s a huge contrast on how married couples with children cope daily.

A great deal of married couples, as well single parent families are fenced in by the pressure of debt and are imprisoned by years of monetary debt because they’ve been caught up in the ‘loan shark’ affliction.

It’s a malady that has an effect on almost everybody in the United Kingdom, those that are unemployed, as well as those that are working, but being paid a low wage and, can’t make ends meet.

They can never break free from the loan sharks who are not phased by the reality that these people may not have the capacity to pay the money back because the loan sharks will get it one way or another.

The only advantage for the married or single unemployed is that they can pay it over an interval with exceedingly high interest rates, the only penalty is that if they can’t pay it their case will be in due course taken to a magistrates court and, the bailiffs will take their movable possessions to the amount of what they are in debt to, if they have no method of paying it back.

Sadly loan sharks take the upper hand of their tragic circumstances and, the results are very often humiliating, not just for adults, but for the children, as well.

To be punished because your family are on the breadline can make a family seem stupid because they weren’t observant and, were drawn in by businesses that are there to take advantage of the the unemployed.

People are desperate to give their families a home that’s reasonably nice, but instead they’re getting hauled into the shark trap and, it’s not just that they can give their families nice things, but it’s also the marketing that goes on around Christmas time and, the coercion it puts on people to get presents for their family and friends.

The government speak about the out of work, like they’ve been out of work forever and a day, but what about those that have just been made redundant, or have just lost their jobs and, have not been able to get any redundancy money and, the likes of Katie Price who degraded those that have no work because there simply isn’t sufficient work to go round because the government are permitting immigrants into our own country and, they can utilise them as low cost labour, as opposed to Brits who aren’t foolish enough to work for silly money.

This should’ve been an indication long ago that something needed to be done about our government and, previous government before this one.

In the beginning, I’m sure the government believed it was an excellent concept but the in the real world people are at the moment displaying that they don’t believe it was such a wonderful visualisation and, that immigration should now stop, full stop!

If we permit immigrants to remain in this country, there will be so much chaos because it is hampering the Brits getting jobs that should be theirs anyhow, that’s why it’s so named the United Kingdom, or else, it may as well be called the United Nations and, in that case the government can invite anyone they like here and, they can take all our jobs.

We definitely require a fresh government, that leaves no doubt, but you can’t beat fire with fire, for which party do you vote for because in reality, at the end of the day, none of them are much better than the other, they all thrive on the same thing and, that’s greed.

Dirty Rotten Teeth

A consultant neurosurgeon begged hospital head of departments following a 44 year old man was admitted to hospital in London, but they declared an explicit ‘absolutely not’.

The man died from a brain haemorrhage after the NHS hospital chiefs reportedly informed doctors to keep working on less pressing cases, which included the removal of another patients decomposed teeth.

No doctors were made obtainable to give medical care to the man who was 44 years old, even though there had been a last ditch request from a consultant neurosurgeon; it was reported.

Trust managers for the Royal London Hospital in East London said that the medics and nurses working on cases over the weekend could not be interrupted and, that they were being paid overtime to carry out the operations to clear a patient accumulation of work which was pressing but not life threatening.

If these situations were not life threatening, could they not have held on for a duration of time, so that more important cases could have been dealt with? It’s sad that patients that are in life and death situations have to be abandoned so that someone with a tooth problem could be dealt with, could have an intern not been able to cope with this situation?

The detention in giving medical care to Mr Venturi probably played a part in his death in May, 2011, an inquest determined. Mr Venturi, from Essex, collapsed at his home on Thursday, April 14 after suffering a ruptured aneurysm in the brain.

He was taken to the Royal London Hospital the next evening when he started slurring his speech and could not stand. A brain surgeon, a radiologist and, anaesthetist were only made obtainable the next Monday.

Mr Venturi became paralysed along one side of his body and developed a blood clot from which he died a fortnight after that. Dr Roger Hunter, a locum consultant neurosurgeon on call when Mr Venturi was admitted to the hospital informed the newspaper: ‘Admittedly, most of the cases being done were urgent or semi-urgent, but all could wait. All of them were less urgent than Mark.

‘I said, “They have got to stop the list; they have to divert the resources to Mark Venturi” The managers rejected his request, he said.

The doctors asserted that controlled practices had held up the patients critical medical care and, Mr Venturi’s family has blamed Barts Health Trust of pursuing foundation trust standing, rather than dealing with his case.

Are these surgeons being rewarded on commission as to what patients gains them the most, or are they being paid by the hour and, does this additionally signify that the more skilled they are, the more they get commissioned?

It appears these days; a hospital is more like a place of worship and, you say your prayers that your loved ones come out alive since surgeons and doctors are far more engaged extracting a tooth, then doing surgery on a sick person that has to have a more severe and difficult operation to be done.

The hospital renounced the claim but have said sorry to the family for failing in Mr Venturi’s care. The trust also said the neurosurgery department had been made better and, is at the moment completely resourced.

By just making that assertion, did they not confess that they were at fault, so why bother denying the accusations in the first place?

If a person was apprehended and charged for a murder that they supposedly done and, they denied the charge, but then subsequently expressed regret to the family, would that not, on the face of it, make them look guilty?

In the past, consultants at Barts have protested about scarcity of theatre time and staff to deal with patients with haemorrhages, yet they are still bold enough to deny that they done anything inappropriate, or are they too embarrassed to admit it?

This Man Deserves A Medal

Alan Chittock gave decades of service on the railways but is at the moment facing disciplinary measures or even dismissal for failing to comply with safety procedures.

The measures that this man took in rescuing a pensioner from being severely maimed, or even killed with his undoing, in fact as far as Southend Central train station are interested, he should have just let the elderly lady die on the track.

Alan Chittock, 50, sprung into action when the woman fell onto the tracks in her wheelchair, shortly before the train was expected into the station.

The courageous man managed to drag her to safety with the assistance of three members of the public.

Onlookers to the event say the woman owes her life to this mans valour and; one member of the public said: “He deserves a medal, not suspension.”

The man’s fearlessness and strength of character is one that you don’t see daily and, this sort of heroism should not come under examination and, the man should not be under inspection or inquiry.

One of the man’s coworkers went on to say: “He had to choose between pushing a button to alert the signaller or saving this lady. I think he made the right choice. They shouldn’t have suspended him.”

His fellow worker then went onto claim that he was well known as a very responsible fellow and, had worked for the station for around 30 years.

The man was at the ticket gates at Southend Central Station, in Essex, on August 28 when the woman, who with her carer, fell from the platform.

The misadventure occurred at 6.10pm, just five minutes before the next London bound train was expected. An eyewitness, who works at a neighbouring cafe, said: “The woman just rolled off the platform edge.”

It seems the man instantly leaped down onto the track and, then some additional members of the public helped to get her back onto the platform. Had the man not got involved, then the woman would have in all likelihood have got hurt because the train was on its way into the station.

Instead of celebrating the reality that this man rescued another persons life, we could really be grieving for the lady in question and, it could be a far more solemn occasion, so Southend Central should be expressing its gratitude to the man, instead of excluding him from his job.

It’s an absurd punishment that a member of staff is brutally treated with disciplinary measures when helping to avoid a possible disaster. This man may have been instructed to alert the signaller, but when a human being is in a situation like that, you don’t always think of what you’ve been taught, but you think like any human being would and, that would be the fastest way to get another human life back to safety because we don’t all think like a book when regarding another human life.

The Cover Up Man!

The rolling out of Universal Credit has been an absolute catastrophe and; very poorly controlled, overambitious and poor value for money.

The assault sheet is appalling because there were no acceptable measures of development, computer systems lack the capacity to recognise potentially dishonest claims and, a £34 million venture in IT organisation had to be written off.

The Department for Work and Pensions lacked the obligatory IT skills and, the required senior guidance. With the scheme way off course, Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith is culpable of deceiving MPs and the public.

He informed the House of Commons on the 5th March that Universal Credit “Is proceeding exactly according to plan.” Now we find out from the NAO that, prior to making his declaration in March, the Department started a 13 week reset of the whole programme.

That’s just the tip of the iceberg, four months earlier, in December 2012, the Department decreased caseloads predicted for the following April by 80 per cent. Five months earlier, the Department had greatly put an end to expanding organisation for the national roll out.

NHS Being Given Millions

It’s a powerful concept; if it wasn’t such a foolish one. When they could be taking that cash and, putting back into the NHS to assist with a patients recuperation, decent employees and manpower.

A lot of that money will be exhausted on methods that will let hospitals, GP surgeries and out of hours doctors to share and retrieve patients electronic medical records. Jeez, what did they do in the 1960s, dispatch it by carrier pigeon?

I comprehend the idea of hospitals and doctors wanting to keep tabs on what patients are taking when they’re admitted to the hospital and, that’s fine, but electronic prescriptions, I think that could get a little complicated and, the whole idea could after some time go wrong.

Basildon Hospital

Basildon hospital confessed that they failed to keep their patients and visitors safe after two people died after contracting Legionnaire’s disease.

Basildon Hospital have now been ordered to pay fines and costs of £350,000 for failing to make sure that the safety of its patients was of the most importance.

The hospital acknowledged fault and; that it didn’t keep its patients, and visitors safe between 2006 and 2007 after patients there contracted Legionnaire’s disease and died and, six more were additionally contaminated by the chronic Legionella.

Chiefs furthermore pleaded that they were culpable to a comparable matter after a patient, who was on the hospital’s elderly ward, was injured after descending five metres from an open window.

The ruling, which was held at Chelmsford crown court, where the judge said: “These are failures of very different kinds but each is in its own way serious.”

He ordered that Basildon Hospital, which is one of the 14 identified in a report into the abnormally inflated death ratio by the NHS medical director, Sir Bruce Keogh, to pay a fine of £100,000 for the Legionnaire’s offence and £75,000 for the fall.

The trust must additionally pay the prosecution’s legal costs of £175,000.

The judge said: “The very phrase Legionnaire’s disease is enough to strike a chord of concern for any of us staying in hospital anywhere in this country, or who have elderly relatives staying in hospital.”

Coping with and, restraining this bacteria is enormous, expensive and involved and, is a problem to hospitals all over.

The degree of Basildon Hospital’s deficiency requires to be seen against the complexity of the problems they’re fronted with and, the amount of people who stroll through their doorway.

This fiasco wasn’t of incomprehension, absence of concern or rash ignorance for the welfare of the patients and visitors, it’s because they’re not being given the supplies and facilities that are required to keep a hospital protected and undamaged.

Nurses and doctors are overtaxed and, stressed out and, right now they’re coming under attack, but the easy vindication is that there are too many leaders and not enough Indians and, it has been hidden for far too long.

When shower heads and thermostatic valves are not being cleansed properly because the financial plan to chemically kill the bacteria was cut and, efforts to address the disease was by super heating hot pipes, which failed by warming cold pipes, then caused bacteria to increase rapidly, then we know that something is severely inappropriate with the structure of the hospital and, how it’s being run.

Playing down the facts is one thing, but when someone says, “That for a lengthy period of time the hospital fell short of its responsibilities and failed its patients”. That’s not a good enough excuse, particularly when there are sick people already in hospital, expecting to get better.

It’s one place that they come to when they’re ill, in the hopefulness that something can be done for them and; that while they’re in there, they’re in the finest credentialed hands and, that they’ll be regarded well and, without prejudice and, that while they’re in there, they will not contract anything more than they went in with.

It’s no good saying sorry for an act that has already been done, it’s like closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. What we need is that it doesn’t happen in the first place and, we know that people are not without fault and, we know that people make errors, but when patients in a hospital are not being behaved towards with due regard and, employees are considering elderly patients an encumbrance, this merely is a sign that we need to divulge what is really going on inside the hospital establishment.

Healthcare providers, like all organisations, have a legalised responsibility to control risks in their hospitals. The hospitals need to make sure that their patients are cared for in a secure setting where they can’t come to any harm or contract anymore afflictions than they have already.

Basildon Hospital need to put money into and, more importantly improve and govern their hospital faultlessly and, to as well keep down the possibilities of any patients contracting anything they shouldn’t have, apart from what they came in with.

Sentiment is misused with words, those words require to all be distilled into endeavours, which causes results and, if we do more with our actions, they may guide to good consequences once again, looking after patients how they were intended to be looked after in the first place.

When looking after patients, there should never be any excuses because these are human beings that are under our supervision and, anyone in the medical vocation should be there to make sacrifices not for themselves, but purely for the sick and infirm.

If you’re going to work in the medical profession and you’re there in vain or to be selfish, lazy or narrow minded, then you shouldn’t be there, for it’s not just a job, but it’s a vocation and, the very first prerequisite in a hospital is that it shouldn’t do the sick any harm!

Son Tried To Kill Mother, 93, Over Care Home Bill

It takes this kind of public attention for somebody to do something when this loyal and elderly son tried to kill his ailing 93 year old mother in her care home.

Nevertheless, why do we have to advertise this sort of thing before anything is done about it.

Even so, if the organisation of the situation had been thought significant enough to do something about it, this situation would not have happened in the first place.

This elderly son was so worried about paying for payment on the care home and, his own well-being because this man has Dementia and, in fact should not have been entrusted to be accountable for his mother in the first place and, Social Services should have taken on that duty.

Social Services did not take any control over the situation because they considered it was not their problem and, they in all likelihood didn’t have the funds to assist this poor man. Although when something bad then happened, instantaneously the money miraculously seems to be available and, out of thin air.

At any moment I’ll be waiting for Paul Daniels to appear from the shadows, “You’ll like this, not a lot, but you’ll like it.”

Nonetheless, when you look at this situation with examination, it’s not this elderly man that is a menace to our society, it’s the government itself, for they are the ones that adjudicate the funding for Social Services and, what goes where and whom it goes to and; if you don’t live in the correct postal address, then you simply don’t get anything.

Nonetheless, you can’t simply play Lottery with someone else’s life or even the way that you regard them. It’s a dangerous business, but what you have to remember is that these elderly people that end up in care homes have worked all their adult life and, for what, to be tossed into some kind of care institution, which if they don’t have enough money to pay for, then the care homes will then come after their children to pay for it and, they have no sense of right or wrong because they don’t care whom they have to pursue to get their money, it’s of no significance to them, so long as they are getting it.

Another thing to consider is this, if these care homes and, the people running them have no sense of right or wrong, does that not mean that they’re not fit enough to look after our elderly ailing family and relatives?

Wherever I go, it’s all about money and, how they can squeeze it from a person and, they will pull the carpet from right under you, just to get it.

We should be looking after the elderly of our society, instead of attempting to isolate them and, doing our utmost to dismiss them from society completely.

They were previously the backbone of our society and, therefore deserve to be regarded with some kind of self respect, but instead people just peer at them as if they are some kind of alien nation.

Society is not satisfied until they strip every last thing off your back, including your hide if they could and, there’s always a rival that will do better than the previous opponent because it’s all about rivalry and, who can do what and, how much they can earn, or take from you without even the slightest conscience.

UNBLEMISHED OPINIONS

We all qualify to give our opinions on everything, but I also think that you need to be comparatively unblemished about what’s going on in the world to clearly get a good enough picture to mount it and, I’m sure Katie Price has mounted many a fine specimen in her lifetime!

When she comes anywhere close to becoming poverty stricken in her lifetime, then she can have a say on who does what, what goes where, even though I’m sure she knows where it goes!

I suppose because she has wealth that she can hurl her influence about, or is that her boobies because she’s had so many booby jobs that she could have given food to thousands of deprived children in the United Kingdom, instead of wasting her money on Silicon Implants.

Imagine of all that cash you could have put aside and, then bestowed onto someone who needs it because obviously Katie Price doesn’t need it if she’s giving it away to give her body a fashion makeover.

I’m sure she’s not infested by financial debt because the government of this country aren’t withholding anything she’s being paid and, I hope she’s never in that situation because you just never know what’s around the corner. Prosperity is pleasant, but it can be gone in just the blink of an eye.

If Katie Price thinks that I’m being unfriendly towards her, then she should not be criticising people who are out of work. You have no concept of their circumstances and, how they obtained what they have in their homes.

People that are out of work don’t even get enough money to have the large bundle on Sky TV and, I admit; there are a large number of people who do smoke and, some drink, but some can’t even afford to do that any longer, but they’re still human beings and, they’re entitled from time to time to go out and let our hair down, after all, you let your hair down all the time and, open to the public, there are definitely no flies on you!

It’s okay to give your opinion and, you’ve done that, now move along to something else that tickles your fancy because there’s nothing tickling the fancy of the unemployed. They don’t live a charmed life, they live a life that is lacking in money and hope.

These people may be poor, but they don’t deserve to be regarded like second class citizens and, they don’t warrant your condescending and haughty behaviour, it’s not an attractive characteristic on anyone, including yourself.

As for the Jeremy Kyle Show, if people want to air their dirty linen in public, that’s up to them, if they have the desire to show themselves up in front of everyone they know on live TV.

As for the unemployed having more appliances than a PC World warehouse, that’s somewhat overstated, don’t you think, after all, if that were the situation, PC World would have gone bankrupt by now because all the unemployed would have purchased all their merchandise.

As for working hard to pay for luxuries, well I’m sure you have way more luxuries than the unemployed of this country and, why should it trouble you so much, you live a charmed life of calm refinement, significant stardom and additional intelligent indulgence.

A charmed life is a woman who travels, gives stupendous dinner parties, hangs out with really cool people and, has a passion for whatever she wants, including wine and great gossip.

On the other hand, I’m not sure if you do live a charmed life. For in my experience a charmed life is something that can’t be acquired because it’s magic doesn’t come from things, but from experiences and, at the end of the day, it’s the small, little gestures, the simple pleasures and, the little details that add sparkle to ones life.

Like a morning of free time, drinking coffee and watching the sun rise, or determining prosperity on your own terms, which will never be established in pursuing wealth, a man or a particular body.

Welcoming things as they are, now, in this moment and, feeling great in your own skin and, finally, good manners and, the way you behave towards others, as well as treating people with affection and esteem.

Katie Price has no right to call the unemployed slothful. She knows nothing about their individual circumstances and, as for flatscreen TVs, there are many people who have them as they’re now the standard TVs of the day, unless Katie Price is now proposing that the unemployed go without TVs and, their children have nothing to watch.

Maybe, Katie you can applaud me for being courageous enough to express my opinion that a large number of ordinary people wouldn’t do because I don’t think that the unemployed should be bullied by Katie Price – Who lives on another planet!

“One who gains strength by overcoming obstacles possesses the only strength which can overcome adversity.”

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this: