THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Ignorance is Bliss within the Demonic Abyss

George Osborne has got it so incorrect and, to think god gave him cerebral matter!

His remark about the first week of unemployment should be looking for work and, not looking to sign on is completely laughable.

Out of work, no job and no money: Even if you did look for a job in that week and, found a potential job, how on earth are you meant to get to the interview if you have no money?

I expect he will claim that one could walk to their interview, all depending on where the job is situated and, one is healthy enough to walk all that way.

However, say someone has had their welfare stopped because ATOS has considered them fit to work, even though they are in a wheelchair, how on earth are they supposed to get to an interview?

I grant George Osborne was given a brain, but he definitely doesn’t use it to its capacity! If he did, then he may realise that one day he may end up incapacitated, not that I would wish it upon anybody, but until it’s happens, many people are extremely ill-informed. The same goes for those that are in employment and, consider the out-of-work wasters of society, but until it happens, you have no concept at all and, one should never form an opinion until they have walked in someone else’s shoes.

Mr. Gideon Oliver Osborne, put yourself in the shoes of other people, who are jobless, but have suddenly been sanctioned because they’ve been told by the Job Centre that they have to look for four jobs a week.

However, suddenly it’s gone from four to six, but no one from the Job Centre notified them and, of course people don’t walk around with a crystal ball up their rear end, so had no way of knowing that the guidelines had changed once more.

Now they have to appeal that decision of being punished for the wrong reasons, which will take weeks, if not months to restore their money, but alas they will have to wait a week before their money is reinstated, so that they have sufficient time to find work.

Nevertheless, it’s not about that at all, is it?

It’s about keeping people off unemployment benefit for a period so that they don’t get paid any welfare because the government need to fill in the deficit that our government has brought upon themselves over the years. In fact, you don’t care whether people are in work or on the streets, so long as the deficit is filled and, the government look respectable enough and, are elected into the next general election.

Mr. Osborne has never been poverty-stricken; he’s had the finest schooling, gone to the crème de la crème of colleges and, he may not have gone from college to being the Chancellor of the Exchequer, but he did work, data entry clerk, typing in the particulars of recently deceased people on the NHS database.

Maybe that’s why he’s got no feeling for other people because in that time, he’s become accustomed to people who where dead and, now can’t manage to live in the real world with people that are actually alive.

Voters vent, as MP’s Spree

A bumper rise for MP’s, not that they don’t get enough wages already, without being given extra. I suppose those magnificent festivities and expensive champagne dinners must be getting way above what they’re being paid. Now MP’s believe that they should fill the bill for extra funds than their worthy of.

I’m not certain what makes them believe that they’re above everyone else and that their salaries should be in level with what chartered accountants are paid.

However, they needn’t earn that much if the tax man didn’t take so much from the hard working classes, but if tax is high, then accountants pick up more earnings, which means that the government can then say that they want their wages to be in line with the tax man because the government only ever do what is fair for their neediness and, no one else’s, not even the tax man!

MP’s will continue to taint their expenditure because they’re selfish. Greedy MP’s that take off the lower class and working class, whilst George Osborne puts pressure on hundreds of families across the UK, saying it’s because he needs to fill in the shortfall that the government sourced in the first place, yet they’re not prepared to cut back on their own lavish lifestyle.

If the people of England have to endure because of the governments complete and utter cock up, then the government should be held liable for such deficiencies, after all they choose to be in a job where they are responsible for people’s lives. They can’t think of it like some business venture, where you become personally interested in something and, then later on become fed up and, then find it a pain in the neck and, then turn a blind eye to it. You cannot be blind to a life!

You can’t overlook a life when it’s still living and, what’s more, you cannot disregard it when it’s no longer here. If someone has a duty of care with regard to another person or person’s and, then they die whilst in their duty of care, then the person who had that duty of care, should be held accountable for their shortcomings, as to why that person or persons died.

Human life may appear of no importance to the government, but if it were their nearest and dearest who was troubled with this hand-to-mouth existence, I’m sure they wouldn’t take that duty of care without incident. Nevertheless, because it’s not their family, they seem to think of that person or person’s like some refuse they can throw onto the scrap heap.

It’s similar to when you were younger and, were at school. You fitted in or you didn’t, not so much class importance, but if you wore glasses, had braces and, wasn’t that attractive, then you were a geek.

You had to fit into the right pigeon hole and, if you didn’t, then you got bullied or just called names, like the government are doing to the lower class and working classes right this moment and, being called a scrounger is a method of bullying, for the lower class and working class that don’t fit into that pigeon hole.

Well, the people of England are not rubbish and shouldn’t be considered so by anyone. If the government believe that the lower classes are scroungers, it’s only because they’ve been pigeon holed.

I know I’m a category, but I do not deserve to be compartmentalised and, while I live, breath and, I’m not in my pine box, I know that as a human being, I should be given free rein to branch out into the human being that I want to be, not what the government believe I should be because I’m an individual, not a robot that can be commanded and, I will not be controlled.

If we’re not allowed to be free thinkers and, we’re not allowed to air or talk over our opinions and, the government need to lock us out and, shut us up all the time, they may as well give us all lobotomies. I already feel like I live in a submissive society, with people who think, but say nothing because they are so damn concerned they may get arrested, or that they may disappear from view.

NHS – Putting a Handle on that Scandal

When did medication that our doctor gave us become so costly? It was such a long time ago, even I fail to remember. Like a great deal of things, I don’t see why we should pay for our medication because we spend so much in levy, that the taxes that a working person pays should go towards medication anyhow, without them having to pay any extra.

It appears that the tax man will take our money for whatever reason that they can imagine and suits them and, if we’re not cautious, next they will be taxing us for the air that we breathe, in fact I would imagine that they’re thinking of methods that they can put into place as we breathe, pardon the pun!

In an article dated 1 April 2011 the coalition’s intentions were to make a tax on fresh air. I actually read through this in the Mirror newspaper back in 2011 and, believed it was a farce and, found it thoroughly amusing, but after all that’s been going on in such a short space of time, I have no skepticism as to what will come next.

It said in the Mirror that the air that we breathe is to be taxed as part of a revolutionary Government plan to raise more money.

I can hear everyone chuckling to themselves, but seemingly people in rural areas will have to pay out the most under this charge and, those living in more polluted cities will be required to pay not so much.

As I read through the article, it reads more and more like an Asimov novel and, it goes on to say that the Air Tariff Control System will evaluate charges in different regions of the country and, each home will be legally responsible for remittance and, gasp even more, the project will be run by a private firm.

I’m wondering and shaking my head because I just can’t believe this is correct, but as stated by the newspaper, it’s true, but you don’t have to be convinced by me, you can read it for yourself and, decide what you believe:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/coalition-plans-tax-on-fresh-air-177406

The Worse and Perverse Osborne

George Osborne must undoubtedly go to bed dreaming pound signs and, wake up in the morning and, then drink pound signs because that’s all he appears to be thinking about these days.

Obviously he’s not a god fearing man because he clearly believes that he is a god.

His ambition is to purge the country of what he thinks are low lives, that sponge from the government and, then he claims to band-aid our economy.

He’s not concerned how he gets these riches, so long as he’s in the seat of authority because it’s a power game and, that’s all it is, it’s all one big game and, he’s not affected in whom he harms along the way to stardom, as long as he’s seen in the media.

He likes being the wicked chappy, in fact he celebrates it, like a hog would roll in the mud and, he is rolling in the mud, the mud of profitability.

It’s not the the low-income and, most vulnerable that are the affliction of our culture, but it’s the people in control that are the bane of our nation. They take and, give very little back, but they make it seem as though they’re doing the impoverished and vulnerable a favour and, not only that, they are also pulling the wool over the working classes, without them even being aware of it.

From Security to Obscurity

It’s such a dreadful thing that Edward Snowden is a whistleblower and, why you may ask? Well, I’m not actually quite sure!

I was watching a programme this morning and, I won’t say which one it was, but they had people telephoning in giving their views and, someone was saying that Edward Snowden was a risk to national security.

Well, I don’t know about you, but I live in England, so to be truthful it has no bearing on me at all, apart from the reality that no one should be spying on another person.

I know we have the threat of extremists these days, but maybe if countries controlled their borders better and, incoming air transport, these things wouldn’t happen, but on the other hand, we live in a day and age where this kind of thing is seen more and more and, undoubtedly we want to see our countries unharmed and, we don’t want to be threatened by the danger of intrusion, whether it terrorism or war, but where will they draw the line?

Will they draw the line at chipping each and every human being, telling people that it will protect them if they have it done and, it will protect them against terrorism, or is there no line and, governments will go to any extent into conning its people into believing that it’s for the welfare of mankind?

As for Edward Snowden, I take my hat off to this man, for not many people would have had the valour to do what he has done because now it has left him with no home to go to. This man did not get up one morning and, just think, “Oh yeah, let’s cause mayhem”. It was a big decision this man made because he knew he would be left open and vulnerable and, whatever he did; he did with certainty and because he believed that people should be informed.

Maybe if more people stood up for what they believed in, certain countries would be a better place because at the end of the day, we all have the power of speech and, there is no reason why we shouldn’t use it. If a person believes that something isn’t right, then they should have the right to say so, that does not make them a danger to national security, it makes them the spinal column that some countries need.

SO YAY! FOR EDWARD SNOWDEN!

Lost in the System!

Before I watched Panorama – Kids lost in Care, I had no concept of what had been going on, so I must be a bit naive where this kind of thing is concerned.

It’s not because I don’t care, of course I care and, I’m sure thousands of other people care out there as well.

So it’s good that Panorama air these programmes because if they didn’t, then the British public would have no visualisation as to what’s happening out there and, there are some pretty catastrophic things going on.

It’s not because people have no empathy; it’s simply because people are so occupied in their own lives, that they simply don’t have enough time for others and, I’m not saying that it’s wrong, but I’m not saying that it’s right.

I’m sure that grooming scams in the care system have been going on for a long time, but back in the day, things were swept under the carpet and, it was never heard of, but in today’s day and age, everything is brought out into the open and, rightly so. People should know what’s going on in our care systems, after all, these are the children of our future and, should be encouraged and, allowed to grow into sound, respectable adults, but that’s not the case and, in all honestly, this has been the case for an extremely long time. Instead of grooming these children to become decent adults, they’re being groomed for other peoples amusements.

Young people in the care system are being primed and, preyed upon for abusers and, those abusers pay young children to be mistreated.

One of Britain’s largest self-governing foster providers, “the National Fostering Agency” purchased a company in 2006 and, then put it up for sale to another for £130 million, making three times the original investment, so then fostering is for financial gain and, venture capitalists are making vast returns out of children in care.

A child goes into the care system every 22 minutes here in the UK, the ethical dispute, is it right that they should be making sizeable quantities of money from children who’ve been afflicted with abuse and negligence, only to go into the care system and, be given more abuse from their caregivers?

Even so, the care providers demonstrate that they provide the best possible protection and support for these young children! Nonetheless, children in the care system are being exported to care homes across the UK and, a great deal of them go missing and, are never found and, yet there is no comeback on the care homes, which makes me wonder, did they go missing or were they sold overseas and, never seen again – And should there not be an investigation into this? I’m not saying this is the case; I am just purely theorising.

What happens to these children that are placed in care homes in the UK? When they are locating these vulnerable children into such deprived areas in the UK, it means that they almost instantly become endangered. Many children go AWOL and, when they go missing; they are at risk, which means they were never safe in the first place.

When children are placed into care homes, it’s because they were at risk, for whatever reason. If they are being put into care homes because they were at risk in the first place, why would they want to then put them into a care home where they are also at risk, they may as well have stayed at risk in the place where they were in the beginning, unless of course the only reason they are being put there is for financial gain, to make a buck!

Families of these children are saying that they are not being looked after and, I can quite believe that. Some of these children go into care because the parents simply cannot cope with them because of difficulties that the child may be having, so some families are still legally accountable for their children whilst they’re in the care system and, do have a say on what happens to their children, even though they don’t live at home any longer, so the responsibility is still to a great extent down to the parent or perhaps grandparents, who are hopelessly attempting to keep in touch with their children or grandchildren, but can’t because all of a sudden that the child has gone missing, but yet the care home are meant to provide safety for that child because we put our trust into that care provider, thinking that our children will be unharmed.

Care homes for children has gone through progressive alterations over the past couple of decades where care has moved from local authorities to private companies, which sounds to me as if all that the care system is there for, is the profit motive and, a child in care can turn out to be extremely profitable.

Privatising everything is not the solution, especially when children and, old people are going to be in danger because it means that these private businesses are going to hire employees at low wages, which means they may get low quality work, because they are not working for the good of the person, they are working for the good of their pockets. They need credentialed people and, people with a drive to work in this type of industry and, frequent Ofsted reports need to be done.

It’s not a case of, if you cannot hear it or see it, it does not exist. This situation does exist and, they are very real for these children that are in the care system through no misdeed of their own. They did not ask to be there, the same as they did not ask to be born, so they are entitled to be regarded with respect and, as a human being and, with dignity!

DIRTY ROTTEN SCOUNDRELS

It didn’t shock me when I read in the tabloids this morning about the scandals and, cover-ups over the deaths of patients in hospitals, specifically Morecambe Bay and Mid Staffordshire.

Does it not make people wonder what other cover-ups there have been? I’m not saying there have been, I am just saying, could there have been?

After all, we only go by the data and facts that we’re given and, believe to be correct of those statistics and data.

I wouldn’t call it a scandal, I would call it a travesty because these poor babies and people have died. We are talking about human lives, not some paperwork that’s been mislaid by the NHS, human beings have died, which makes it a travesty.

There is no room for error when working with patients in a hospital. These are human beings that are in there being treated and, there is no room for clinical failures and, if this kind of clinical failure is being covered up by health regulators and, allegedly two former health ministers, then the structure of the NHS needs to be adjusted and, someone more capable needs to be running it.

That does not mean it should be privatised, because it seems that when anything goes wrong, immediately it’s privatised because the no one wants to take the blame.

Whatever is going on right now makes our health system a mockery and, Florence Nightingale would be rolling in her grave. The system and great work that she attained is now being overwhelmed by inept people who think that they can play god with someone else’s life and, what’s more, it doesn’t seem to disconcert them and, there is no sense of right and wrong any longer.

There not only needs to be an investigation into what has been going on, but these people need to be named and, the people who have died and, the babies that have died, their families need some closure, in as much as, these people concerned should in due course be named and shamed and, their actions should have some consequence by the judicial system.

SIMPLISTIC SOLUTIONS ON VIDEO

Why does the Chancellor have to narrate a simplistic video giving an explanation of why we need the cuts, what does he deem us all deaf, dumb and blind and, if that’s the case and, he believes that, then why has he reduced all our money?

He’s informed Britain can’t spend money it doesn’t have. Why is he telling the public, we didn’t spend the money, we didn’t get the country into financial debt, but his debt busting intentions have been afflicted with problems as the statistics manifested that the governments alleged scrounging has in point of fact grown in the last monetary year.

Mr. Osbourne was stated as saying, “My job is to bring down the deficit so this country starts living within its means. Doing that means making tough choices”.

I can’t see Mr. Osbourne or the rest of them living inside their wherewithal, particularly when it’s been in the media about certain people in government and MP’s living above their means with two residences, nursemaids and, other little fringe benefits they pick up along the way.

Mr. Osbourne also stated, ‘We will look after those who need our help, but make sure benefits do not go up faster than wages.

When he said they would look after those who need our help, he wasn’t talking about the mainstream public, he was talking about those in his cabinet. And of course he’s going to make certain welfare assistance doesn’t go up quicker than the mediocre salaries that some people get and, as a matter of fact I’m not sure what the average wage is because they keep moving the goal posts and, in doing so they’re baffling the public into thinking that they’re in reality doing them a favour.

By taking people’s money away from them, means that the deficit will not go down because he has failed to boost living standards and, therefore economic growth will fail to go up, but instead it will go down drastically.

If people cannot afford to buy and, spend money on things, then there will be financial collapse and, this is why he is stealing millions to pay for the cost of that economic failure, virtually like panic gain, he is panic capping from the low-income person because he now realises what a unacceptable error he has made and, cannot worm his way back from and, in due course the people will become aware of his oversight and, they will be like a lynch mob.

The government will of course say that it was an error on their part and, that they were perhaps wrong, but by that time, their time at No. 10 will be over and, then David Cameron and his mariners can then crawl back into the dirt from whence they came and, still come out of it smelling of roses, but in the meanwhile they can do whatever they want with our financial system and, then leave it for another future PM to deal with, it’s no skin off their noses.

Looking for one’s Prey!

Women on Top: How Real Life Has Changed Women'... — Women on Top: How Real Life Has Changed Women’s Sexual Fantasies (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

A campaign against the sexual abuse of Women and Girls – Did Boris Johnson fail to remember about the sexual abuse of boys that goes on daily?

Nonetheless, sex and relationship teaching should be obligatory in our schools, in a day and age when sexual relationships is extremely commonplace and, as well an almost habitual activity.

In our culture young teenagers dress up like they are grown women, which men and young teenagers believe it is their god given right to exploit that situation.

Just because a young teenager dresses up to look like a woman, does not give anyone the right to abuse that situation or the trust of that person, who believes they safe in the hands of another human being.

Some men would say that because a young woman decorates herself like an older woman that they’re asking for it and, that is not the case. The case is that all young women want to be older, the same as when they get older they wish to be younger, that does not signify that as they get older and, want to be younger, that we should regard them as children.

There are a lot of Mother’s, Father’s who will talk about the birds and the bee’s to their teenage children, but by the time they’ve got round to it, because of outstanding awkwardness, their young teenagers have by this time acquired a knowledge of what they think is sex education from their friends.

It’s not just about educating young teenagers about sex, it’s about teaching them about the things that can happen to them when they are out there in the real world, such as being taken advantage of and, about sexual assault, the sex trade and such like.

And it doesn’t just occur outdoors, but it can happen in their own home, over the internet. There are so many things that can happen to them in their own front room or bedroom and, Mother’s, Father’s would have no idea until it was too late.

If sex education is going to be addressed, then it has to be done properly and, everything has to be covered.

If a Mother, Father is not going to cover everything, then it is down to the education department to do that, after all, while they are in school and, in the schools care, then it is the duty of that said school to teach and, they have a duty of care to do so, as they also have a duty of care while they’re at school, including lunchtime, breaks and, until they reach home, because while they wear a school uniform, means that the school have a duty of care for that said person.

Times have changed since I’ve been at school, things were much different when I was younger and, unusually strict, particularly when it came to school regalia.

The heel of one’s shoe could not be higher than 1 and half inches, skirts should be on the knee or below, but not higher than the knee and, so forth.

As I walk through my town, I see a great deal of teenagers with skirts that could look like belts and, I can practically see what they had for lunch, which doesn’t do much for my constitution!

However, if I were a man, things could be quite different when looking for lunch and, I’m sure it could work wonders for his physical condition.

So, not only do we have to teach sex education and, violence against women, but we also have to educate them the manifestations that could be caused by being dressed in certain clothing and, although we should be able to dress in what we like, however short, or low-cut it may be, at the end of the day, some men are just animals looking for their prey!

MORALLY OR LEGALLY WRONG?

We hear about government wrongdoings in the tabloids daily and, some are more fascinating than others, but this one just about beats the biscuit.

If this was about Mr. Joe Public doing the dirty on someone else, they would be sent to court for fraud and, most probably imprisoned, or at least an extremely heavy fine, all hinging on how many times they’d done this sort of thing previously.

In the governments case, they appear to be doing it all the time, they’re supposedly fibbing and, duping the figures to make the public think that they’re getting people back to work, or at least more people than is in accordance with the facts.

If the government can’t bring the true facts to the table, then obviously they can’t do the job that they were put in that position for and, should go obtain another job that they can do, because they’re looking more and more inept and, maybe the tasks that they have been given is just too much for them.

The thing is, they’ve told so many untruths, that they’re not sure which ones are in fact true and, now they’re themselves actually beginning to believe their own lie.

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this: