THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Don’t Bank On Seeing A Doctor After COVID 19

RUxNODc5NDU3NzM=.jpg

It’s been said that life will never be the same following the COVID 19 pandemic, and the new normal has even changed the way we access local healthcare.

From booking visits to A&E, live video links with doctors, and receptionists giving a triage service, and far-reaching changes are set to transform how we’re treated.

Plans were well underway before lockdown to relieve the stresses on the healthcare service that was creaking, as GP’s and A&E’s buckled under the stress of rising demands, and novel ways of working were already being put in place to prevent emergency departments becoming bogged down with patients by offering more reliable methods of triage.

GP’s were also looking at ways to use their resources more carefully, including holding telephone consultations, and these measures were conveniently set in motion as lockdown hit but now it seems they’re set to continue.

As well as GP telephone consultations, Clinical Commissioning Groups are introducing care navigators to surgeries following trials during the crisis, and under the scheme, receptionists have now had the training to triage patients and refer them to the best service.

But, there are some concerns on how those who are less able, such as the elderly, would cope, and some struggle just attempting to make an appointment with their GP, particularly if they’re hard of hearing, they would find it challenging speaking to a receptionist at their doctor’s surgery.

And some elderly people don’t even own a mobile phone because they have no concept of how to use one, so they use their landline, that’s if they even have one, and the older generation feels much more at peace when consulting with a doctor face to face, and some wouldn’t know how they would manage having a telephone appointment instead.

It certainly wouldn’t feel reassuring speaking to a doctor on the phone as what it would in person. Nevertheless, an innovative way to remove some of the constraints has already been started, and well before the pandemic.

London based company, Medic Spot rolled out a new service to pharmacies last year, offering a two-way live video link between patient and doctor with diagnostic technology, and the People’s Chemist, in Southend on Sea, England, took on the service in October 2019, and the owner thinks it will serve to relieve stress on NHS resources, offering time-strapped visitors a fast and efficient option to the conventional surgery.

NHS bosses are also trialling a 111 first model that will see patients calling the triage line to schedule a visit to A&E if it’s considered essential.

Pilot schemes have started, with the system going nationwide by the winter.

Under the proposals, NHS 111 will serve as a triage point so people requiring critical treatment can book their care. Some will still go to A&E’s, but others may be transferred to primary treatment centres, primary care or hot clinics.

A spokesperson for campaign group Save Southend NHS said that they wouldn’t want to see telephone triage become commonplace in A&E departments in Mid and South Essex, or at any other hospital in the United Kingdom.

And by their very essence, A&E departments should be adequately staffed and open 24/7 and able to receive all or any blue light patients and walk-ins.

And with the population of Southend now topping 320,000 and increasing quickly, it’s essential that they maintain and indeed invest for larger and better A&E services in the town.

A spokesperson for the Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust said that they’re now actively urging people to call NHS 111 before visiting Emergency Departments and that from December, it will be part of a national programme.

This new system won’t replace 999 calls for life-threatening emergencies such as a suspected heart attack or stroke, and a spokesperson for Southend and Castle Point and Rochford Clinical Commissioning groups said that practices have made exceptional progress over the preceding few months in delivering triage and online consultations and will be encouraged to continue.

So, basically, they’re giving the Nazi Ann Robinson lookalike receptionists more of a right to say ‘Nein’, you can’t have a service, and that you’re the weakest link – goodbye!

Boris Johnson Admits The Government Could Have Done Things Differently

Boris Johnson has confirmed there were things the government could have done differently in its handling of the coronavirus crisis, and in a marked shift in tone, the Prime Minister admitted that lessons could have been learnt from the first stages of the pandemic.

And he acknowledged that the government didn’t understand the virus in the way that they would have wanted in the initial few weeks and months, and he said that perhaps there were things they could have done different and of course, there will be the opportunity to understand what precisely they could have done, or done differently.

Boris Johnson stated, that when they listen to the scientists, the questions that they ask are really open questions as far as they’re concerned and that there would be an opportunity to analyse all those problems.

He said that he believed that the sole thing that they didn’t recognise at the start was the degree to which it was being transmitted asymptomatically from person to person, but he would not be drawn on any particular lapses in judgement, such as lack of protective kit for frontline workers and the turbulent testing regime.

And Boris Johnson dismissed that lockdown had come too late, despite several of the government’s own scientific advisers saying that the UK’s death toll could have been lower if constraints had come sooner.

And he stated that it was on the contrary and that if you looked at the time of every single piece of advice that they were given from their advisers, from SAGE, that whenever they said that they needed to take a particular action, that they adhered to that advice like cement.

So, Boris Johnson has finally admitted the Government has mishandled its response to the coronavirus, and this has finally put to bed the Prime Minister’s earlier claim that his Government took the right decisions at the right time.

When all said and done, Boris Johnson was too slow to acknowledge the threat of the virus, too slow to start lockdown and too slow to take the disaster seriously, and the menace of a second wave is still quite evident.

And it’s crucial the Government learns the lessons of its errors so that they can help save lives, and the Prime Minister and his Government must face reality so that they can recognise where they went wrong so that they can learn from their blunders which have led to fatal consequences.

And maybe not letting people in from other countries while we were in the middle of a pandemic would have been a great start, or urging people to wear face masks earlier when in stores – this is all common sense and something that is extremely obvious.

There were UK Government contracts for PPE worth more than £830 million that had been granted to at least 12 separate companies, supporters of the Conservative Party, and PPE has never evolved.

And the coronavirus pandemic has allowed some to replenish their coffers, so say thank you to the Tory enablers you voted in, and Labour attacked the Government of handing out profitable COVID 19 contracts to Conservative friends and warned that supplies had not been delivered.

More than $1 trillion of corporate profit smuggled into tax havens to dodge taxes – UK, Switzerland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, the ‘axes of tax avoidance’, responsible for 72 per cent of global tax loss, and the United Kingdom takes little effective action against the avoidance industry.

And if deception has been perpetrated they should be named and shamed, and then prosecuted irrespective of who they are.

That said, historically British governments and local authorities are world-class when it comes to wasting taxpayers money, irrespective of their political leaning.

Lies are spread and then the onus is placed elsewhere, and Brexit was the biggest lie in British politics this decade and the majority fell for it, hook, line and sinker.

The first failing for Boris Johnson was that he didn’t attend the Cobra meetings on the pandemic. He missed the first five Cobra meetings and then later maintained he didn’t know until late that some people were asymptomatic carriers.

However, if he had attended the earlier Cobra meetings he would have known this and saying that he didn’t understand this virus was a deception.

They had loads of time to prepare and did zilch and they let it get out of control, but then the Tories have never been interested in listening, with one exception – money, that’s been extorted or extracted.

These people have a terminal mindset that is one of elitism and divine freedom to dominate. Not because of any particular skill, but because some public school head told them so, and millions have suffered because of it.

And the industrial and tech revolutions have made millions obsolete in their economic design, and then they’re therefore lied to and treated like filth.

The United Kingdom is a pretty basic and very rudimentary society, and the average Brit is afraid, terrified and kept illiterate, and then you have Labour acting all smart, but that’s like locking the stable door after the horse has bolted.

And it’s shocking that so many have died through the Governments inadequacy, and I bet now the opposition parties are laughing their heads off, as this Government is slaughtering itself without them having to oppose them in any way.

And to be fair, if Boris Johnson had been honest and true to the British people, that would have at least been refreshingly nice, but it’s too late now Boris and now you’re being honest, saying that you messed up. Well, tell that to the families of the 50,000 plus who’s kin have died through Boris Johnson’s vanity and inadequacy.

Now Boris Johnson is going on about obesity, well, he really does need to take a good look at himself in the mirror – oink oink! What’s he been eating out of? The trough of plenty, and now the blob is saying they could have done things differently.

And it seems as if not everyone is wearing their masks and staff have been told not to challenge, confront or refuse entry to anyone who isn’t wearing one. Well, that’s another nice mess Boris has got us into, and one that’s totally unenforceable.

And something tells me Boris Johnson isn’t going to get much sympathy because there’s no justification for the things this Government have allowed to happen.

They are the only ones complicit in this tragedy, no one else, no matter how hard they try to shift the blame onto innocent bystanders and to be fair, Boris’s career has been one whopper after another.

If he can’t testiculate, jabber or bluff his problems away, he goes into hiding, and he might have admitted his shortcomings but he also needs to admit responsibility as he’s deemed to be in charge of everything.

Come on Boris, you’re the Prime Minister, so anything that has arisen because of what the Government have done or failed to do is 100 per cent your responsibility.

And I don’t believe the families and friends of the 65,000 plus who’ve died are going to say, ‘Oh, that’s okay then. The Government messed up and my relative or friend died as a result of their ineptitude, but it was nothing to do with Boris Johnson and his Government, someone else was to blame’.

This should have been brought in when there was the first mention of the virus, not three months later, and I just wish that our Government would learn from this and actually organise themselves properly.

Boris Johnson should have fired Dominic Cummings, that was the turning point when our country eventually lost patience with Boris Johnson, and that’s when he lost control of the country, and he will never get that back, and that was his damaging mistake.

Because prior to the Dominic Cummings embarrassment, most people were doing what the Government told them to do, and when Dominic Cummings wasn’t fired, people justifiably decided that if the rules didn’t apply to him, then the rules didn’t apply to them either.

And now it’s the denial of their mistakes, and the instant endeavours to condemn someone else, which highlights Boris Johnson as mean-spirited and callous.

After all, it was there in the public domain what would happen if the UK buried its head in the sand. Italy produced a blueprint and the Far East was taking it really seriously from day one.

And it seems that several more underdeveloped countries had done an exceptional job at containing their outbreaks, while here in the United Kingdom we’re still bickering over face coverings.

The virus came from China and it made it as far as our relatively near neighbours Italy, so why didn’t our Government not realise it was going to come here to the United Kingdom when it reached Italy and lockdown quickly?

Even the SAGE government advisers stated if lockdown had come one week earlier as they had urged the Government to do, half the deaths could have been averted.

Face Mask Rules In Takeaways Finally Confirmed

People grabbing takeaway coffee or food in England will have to wear a face covering.

Brandon Lewis cleared up days of uncertainty over compulsory masks that have been launched in England, and it’s now law to wear a face-covering in shops and supermarkets in England, with £100 fines for rule-breakers.

But people won’t have to wear a mask in restaurants or bars, because it’s impossible to do so while eating or drinking, but that left uncertainty over the dictates for takeaway food and drink outlets, like Pret a Manger or McDonald’s.

For days, ministers failed to clear up the situation before full laws were issued, but now Brandon Lewis stated you will have to mask up in a takeaway, depending on why you’re going there.

If you’re sitting down and eating in the takeaway, you don’t need a mask, but if you’re paying for food or drink then taking it out, you do need a mask.

Brandon Lewis said people will also need to wear masks in high street banks and indoor petrol station counters, as those are effectively a retail outlet, and he insisted the rules were reasonable common sense.

You have to sit down straight away if you’re going to eat in, and if you can sit at a table, you don’t need to wear a mask, although Brandon Lewis didn’t mention this plan and it was unclear if this was part of the official rules.

No 10 has changed the rules on masks as part of a set of new constraints in an attempt to avert a possibly catastrophic second wave this winter.

Children under 11, people with specific disabilities, those eating or drinking and companions of deaf lip-readers are among those exempt.

Shops can deny admission to people not wearing a mask and can call the police as a last option, but officers warn the law will be practically impossible to implement.

And the Association of Convenience Stores said they have urged members not to challenge customers resistant to wearing a covering, and Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick recommended shop workers should only call the police if they had tried everything else.

She said, that calling the police should be the last option for dealing with a mask issue, but of course, the law is the law, and her belief was that the large preponderance of people would comply, and people who didn’t comply would be humiliated into complying or shamed into leaving the shop by the storekeepers or by other members of the public.

But what’s the point of making it law to wear a mask when the police have stated the law is unenforceable?

The police don’t even turn up to house crimes, so I doubt they will go to a store or takeaway because the staff have rung them and said someone has come in and isn’t using a mask, please come and rescue us.

This is an entirely absurd and unenforceable law, but I guess this, ‘we don’t know what we’re doing’ government needs to be seen as doing something, even if it is pointless and too little too late.

And it looks like this Brexiteer Government is prepared to slaughter as much as possible, including small shops, where it won’t be worth or indeed possible to pop in for the impulse buy as shops depend upon.

So, next time there’s a complete lockdown they won’t be there as Boris Johnson would have made them insolvent, and masks don’t make you invincible, and numerous medical personnel caught COVID 19 despite wearing masks.

Of course, this will be another Boris Johnson faecal matter, and people are getting weary of his bumbling lackadaisical failures. And the police might enforce this rule for a while but they have more important things to do with their time than to implement a so-called rule change.

If the police couldn’t enforce the lockdown properly, they certainly won’t be able to enforce mask-wearing, and this is a complete hodge-podge, and while I’m on the topic, masks should be given free on prescription for people who are entitled to free medicines because if they can give out millions to China, I’m certain they can do this for the British people.

But then that would mean that all of Scotland and Wales would get them free as they don’t pay for prescriptions and as usual, the preponderance of England would have to pay for them all.

And what loophole will apply when Dominic Cummings is caught with his pants down for not wearing a mask?

And those people who are now back at work, they will be working with people for 8 hours, and they won’t know if they have the virus or not or who they came into contact with the day before, and who might have passed the virus on, but yet they don’t have to wear a mask.

However, if you want to pop into your local shop to purchase a pint of milk and you’d literally be in and out in about 30 seconds you have to wear a mask, doesn’t make much sense, does it? But what can we expect from this government?

It appears this Government doesn’t actually have a clue, and they’re not managing this very well, and now some people are saying they won’t go to shops because they’re a lot of people in a democratic country who will refuse to wear something that they don’t believe will benefit them.

But the big question is, why didn’t they implement this at the start of the pandemic, and it makes you question if these so-called experts have any idea what we’re fighting, or perhaps they don’t, but really don’t want to tell people the truth.

And even more ridiculous, they’re telling people to go back into work, and they’re letting people hit the pubs at the weekend and then they’re going back into work – I think this government needs to take their heads out of their bum.

And now we’re allowed to go into cafes and eateries, but we don’t have to wear a mask. We can sit down on the seats, order the food and then contaminate the table and we don’t actually know if it’s been cleaned adequately for the next person.

And let’s face it, folks, would you seriously have a vaccine injected into you that’s been hurried through without the normal testing time period et cetera? The vaccine could end up killing you, and in doing so achieve what this exaggerated virus failed to do.

There’s clearly some jumbled messaging going on here, and it now appears quite deliberate, and there’s no science to back up that if you’re seated eating a burger that you can’t catch the virus, and it would seem that such mixed messaging is something that SAGE and the Behavioural Insights Team believe can shape behaviour to the discretion of authoritarian politicians.

Evidently, it’s difficult to get a doctor to give you anything to show exemption, and it will only be children under 11 who will escape the ignorance of the mask-wearing coronaphiles.

But people with genuine health reasons will face the pitiful mask shaming that will now trend, and why are staff working exempt? Now they can breathe all over you and your food in a store.

This is all quite absurd. You have to wear a mask on a bus, but the operator doesn’t, and most operators choose not to wear a mask and may have spent the day coughing and sneezing in the vehicle, contaminating the equipment you use when paying your fare, even in a contactless manner.

This is all completely unworkable, so why bother with this drama, which does nothing more than please the feeble-minded, who get some ghastly satisfaction from seeing others forced to do something they don’t want to do, in this case wearing a mask.

Have you noticed Rishi Sunak wearing a medical-grade N95 mask which filters his breath back out so he can contaminate you, but then there are loads of people wearing these masks. And he’s one of the people giving out advice, it’s like a comedy of errors.

And some people are asking why the current coronavirus has brought the world to a standstill, while a previous dangerous coronavirus, SARS, did not. Others have questioned why a vaccine is so crucially needed now to hinder the spread of the current coronavirus when a vaccine was never developed for SARS.

The tale of SARS and its novel cousin that causes COVID 19, SARS-CoV-2, reveals just how variable viruses can be, especially when they bounce from animals to humans, and understanding emerging, communicable diseases needs to be a priority.

SARS, which killed approximately one in 10 infected people and turned out to be extremely deadly, yet eventually and somewhat mysteriously vanished.

SARS, or severe acute respiratory syndrome, was first seen in Guangdong province, China in November of 2002, when doctors there saw this unusual pneumonia, but the disease was not reported to the World Health Organisation at that time.

In February of 2003, another outbreak transpired in Hanoi, Vietnam, and a WHO officer, who later died, examined a patient there and reported a massive outbreak to the WHO main office on March 10, 2003.

Meanwhile, a doctor from Guangdong province went to Hong Kong and stayed at the Metropol Hotel, along with a number of other international travellers.

The doctor was contaminated with what we now know as SARS-CoV-1, and the virus was transmitted to at least a dozen other hotel patrons.

Two returned to Canada and took the disease there. One returned to Ireland, one to the United States. Three went to Singapore, and one to Vietnam.

In addition, several people were hospitalised in Hong Kong, leading to an outbreak in the hospital there. From that point, SARS spread to much of the world, although most cases settled in Asia.

The disease was aggressive and deadly, and patients typically showed symptoms inside two to three days.

There were few reports of any infections without symptoms, as there were with COVID 19.

The masks came out, temperature scanners were installed in all major public gathering places in China and other parts of Asia, quarantines were implemented, but the virus climaxed in late May of 2003, and then it disappeared, so perhaps the stringent quarantine measures paid off, and by July 2003, WHO announced the threat was over.

SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 are closely related viruses, and scientists think that both viruses started in bats.

The RNA genomes of the viruses are around 80 per cent identical, so what does this mean?

Our own genomes are over 98 per cent identical to those of chimpanzees, so 80 per cent seems a lot less similar, so for a virus, particularly one with an RNA genome, this is actually pretty closely related.

That’s because viruses can mutate quite quickly, and they make a lot of mistakes when they copy their genomes, and they can make thousands of copies within several hours, and the two viruses have very similar proteins on their surface and use the same proteins, or receptors, on our cell surfaces to enter the cell, and these receptors are seen in a number of different cell types.

Most studies of SARS-CoV-1 centred on the lungs because that’s where the most severe disease transpired, but both viruses can infect a number of different organs, and it’s not known how often other organs are infected with SARS-CoV-2 until there’s time to do proper post-mortems to thoroughly appreciate the way the virus causes disease.

And the scientist won’t know the actual number until they can test a lot more people, and can understand the role of people without symptoms.

With SARS-CoV-2, it takes about two weeks for the symptoms to develop, and many people don’t have any symptoms at all. So, imagine asking someone whom they’d had contact with for the last two weeks – can you exactly remember most people you had contact with for the past two days, let alone two weeks?

The crucial tool for pandemic control is extremely challenging to execute, and this would mean that the only safe thing to do, is to maintain quarantine of everyone until the pandemic was under control.

So, what about the SARS vaccine? Well, the vaccine studies for SARS-CoV-1 was started and experimented on animal models.

An inactivated whole virus was used in ferrets, nonhuman primates and mice.

All the vaccines resulted in protective immunity, but there were difficulties because the vaccines resulted in an immune disease in animals.

No human studies were done, nor were the vaccine studies taken further because the virus disappeared.

Several factors were involved at the end of SARS-CoV-1. Maybe it was the summer weather, perhaps it was the stringent quarantine of all those who had contact with infected people, but we don’t actually know why the epidemic ended – viruses are like that, unpredictable.

Many of the vaccines being developed for SARS-CoV-2 are considerably different, and many use only small portions of the virus, or the virus RNA.

This may evade the problems with SARS-CoV-1 vaccines that used more of the virus, and vaccine development has a large experimental component, with educated guesswork, seeking various things to see what works – hence why many different avenues for vaccines are being tested by various labs around the world.

But with the extensive economic penalty of Brexit coming, this country would never be able to afford it.

Over the past ten years, the Tory’s have increased our national debt by well over 500 billion so far and it’s only going to get worse.

So, wear a mask, except if you’re eating because COVID 19 supposedly has respect for those that are eating and won’t attack them, but if you’re queueing up for food, beware.

And it seems that masks offer no protection whatsoever to wearers or others. Viruses are airborne and move through the air as you breathe in or out, and this seems like it was a political decision and not a scientific one.

Vladimir Putin Has A Dozen Sleeper Spies

1_Former-Russian-Spy-Anna-Chapman-Poses-On-The-Catwalk-For-Shiyan-And-Rudkovskaya-During-Moscow-Fashio.jpg

Deep cover Russian operatives are rooted in our society, security officials believe, and up to a dozen highly trained illegals may have been here in the United Kingdom for years in one or two-person cells.

Now the Government is poised to ramp up M15’s abilities to stop undeclared spies by making their presence in the United Kingdom criminal, and it follows the report into Kremlin meddling in the Brexit referendum, which called for a crackdown on spy activity in the United Kingdom.

Included in a review of the Official Secrets Act will be a kind of foreign intelligence officer registration, which spies will have to sign on entering the United Kingdom or chance being prosecuted and imprisoned.

It’s not currently a crime to live in the United Kingdom as an undercover officer.

The Government are further invoking the Magnitsky Act, named after murdered Moscow lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, which can allow the freezing of Russian assets.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson stated that this Government was bringing forward a law, not only a new Espionage Act, not only new laws to protect against theft of our intellectual property but also a Magnitsky Act immediately to counter people in Russia or elsewhere who infringe human rights.

Sources say the undeclared illegals are instructed in Soviet-style spy schools outside Moscow.

They could be used for pre-mission surveillance and one may even have helped prepare the novichok assault on Sergei Skripal.

Relating to the Russian spy service, a former military intelligence officer stated, it was remotely likely the GRU were helped in the Salisbury assault by an illegal.

Other information undercover officers could give might include data on the coastal territory or local troop movements.

Crucially they would also know what to look for in critical infrastructure such as dams, water systems and power networks or installations to be targeted for sabotage.

Russia’s most well-known illegal was Anna Chapman, who remained undercover for numerous years in Britain and the US before being rumbled by the FBI in 2010.

Security Minister James Brokenshire stated that they were clear-eyed in relation to the threat that Russia poses, that’s why they had taken the actions that they had and that there could be no normalisation of their bilateral relationship until Russia stopped the destabilising activity that endangers the United Kingdom and our allies, and that threatens the safety of our citizens.

Labour’s Nick Thomas-Symonds told the Commons that British security agencies require help stopping Russia spies, and he said they’ve not got strategic assistance, the legislative means or the resources needed to protect our interests.

And the Prime Minister hit back at allegations the Kremlin might have helped influence the Brexit referendum, and he said that the people of this country didn’t choose to leave the EU because of Russian meddling, they voted because they want to take back control of our money, our trade policy and our laws.

And while the largely non-dom and foreign-owned right-wing media has you all chirping on about reds under the bed, there’s practically no scrutiny about the far greater menace undermining our democracy, and how the prosperous buy direct access to political leadership, influencing decisions in their favour, and until we challenge that issue head-on, our own democracy will remain in real and present danger.

But this is what happens when you have a country that’s free to enter for all.

Boris Johnson Turns Down EU Vaccine Scheme

0_ritains-Prime-Minister-Boris-Johnson-visits-COVID-10-testing-Lab-Milton-Keynes-United-Kingdom-1.jpg

Boris Johnson has turned down the EU’s vaccine scheme over fears of delays, and it’s understood that following weeks of discussions about joining the scheme, the Government believes that it could delay the rollout of a possible vaccine by up to six months.

However, they’ve been accused of believing in Brexit over vaccines in the wake of the decision, and the UK has officially declined in taking part in the programme, and it appears that the UK government has chosen on this occasion not to join the internal EU initiative, but given their shared interest in ensuring that vaccines were accessible to all, that they were committed to strengthening their collaboration with the EU outside the framework.

Ministers have now struck an agreement with Oxford University and pharmaceutical goliath AstraZeneca to expedite trials of a possible vaccine, and to roll it out in months if it proves triumphant.

Business minister Alok Sharma is said to have withdrawn from the project after failing to get adequate assurance that the United Kingdom would get the number of vaccines it needs on time.

But Lib Dem leadership contender Layla Moran accused the government of putting ideology over public well-being, and she added that working together would have helped push down costs and make sure that we got value for money.

You would think that during a pandemic ministers would put political dogma aside, but it appears that for this government it’s Brexit over vaccines.

The decision came weeks after officials in London and Brussels said Britain was in negotiations with the EU about whether it would seek a proposal by the bloc to obtain supplies of possible vaccines against COVID 19.

But the 1 per cent who run the country and deceive you into voting for them aren’t worried about you or your families because they have that much money they will never have to live like you or eat the same food as you.

And I just hope and pray more people come alive and see the reality of life today and the future.

Boris Johnson and his government delayed their COVID 19 response, that was conducive in the deaths of over 47,000 people in the United Kingdom, and then there were the needless deaths of the elderly in care homes due to their policy of sending COVID 19 contaminated patients back into the care homes which prompted countless deaths, but then its always been ideology before individuals.

And one day, quite soon, Brexiteers are going to wake up to the reality that basically they’ve voted in a host of Tories whose only purpose is to get wealthy on the back of Brexit.

There’s nothing for the voters in the United Kingdom – zero, and our government are self-serving, self expecting, ruthless brutes, doing precisely what’s good for their offshore reserves despite it being detrimental for the people.

And this was in preparation for no deal, which is what the Johnson government actually wanted all along, but then Boris Johnson doesn’t do facts and believes that anything to do with the EU is automatically obverse without any thought of whether it would help the people of the United Kingdom.

And he clearly thinks that delivering a vaccine in the United Kingdom would be more beneficial than delivering it from the EU, but the people of the United Kingdom shouldn’t have such a short memory, look how badly we struggled with PPE.

However, working together with the EU, wouldn’t that produce faster and better solutions? Because of course, the UK has done so brilliantly so far. Perhaps our government didn’t wake up to the reality that this virus was going to turn into a pandemic.

So, they were delayed in imposing lockdown, slow in obtaining enough PPE and ventilators for hospitals. Too sluggish in executing a sufficient testing system, too late in achieving a track and trace system, which didn’t achieve when they did.

They changed their minds on a daily basis on what people could do and could not do, leaving everyone completely bewildered. Slackening lockdown too quick when the infection rate was creeping up and not going down.

This is incredible because it’s about protecting lives and has absolutely nothing to do with politics or Brexit, and if this decision not to help with the development of a vaccine to fight the coronavirus isn’t evidence that we’re in the hands of irrational Brexit enthusiasts then nothing is, and what if the EU develops a vaccine before the UK – do we simply let people die?

And while the remainder of the world are pulling together to get a vaccine that works Boris Johnson is convinced that Oxford University and pharmaceutical colossus AstraZeneca will find one sooner than the rest of the world’s scientists combined – so it will be fine, Boris knows what he’s doing.

But then the Tories with their private health care will get the vaccine anyhow, never mind the rest of the population, but there are people out there who are getting thoroughly sick and tired of his incessant lying and total inadequacy because the Tories only have one intention and that’s to get rich, and that’s all that they’re actually interested in.

And every day that Boris Johnson is here, the bigger the hole he digs for the conservative party, and the longer they will have to slither back under their rock and stay there when the government inevitably falls once this is over, and you have to consider that with every day he endures, more people are dying through this governments ineptitude.

But then why do people seem shocked because the only thing that’s relevant to Boris Johnson is Brexit, with the American’s lobbing him millions for selling ordinary Brits down the river, but then you only get what you vote for.

With the US alleging that it’s doubtful that a settlement with be agreed before election time. Even if it is, confirmation of the deal won’t be until sometime next year, and if Donald Trump loses, and it’s looking that way at the moment, then Joe Biden will be president and his strategy for improvement is to inspire people to buy US products.

In other words, he will probably delay ratification until the US economy has picked up, leaving the UK with no main market at all to market our goods and improve the economy.

Once again Boris Johnson’s not doing anything that’s best for this country, and he expects everyone to kneel down to him and get everyone on board to get their pockets lined instead of paying for a vaccine that could protect people, which either way could take six months plus before the Oxford vaccine is available.

Another setback for the health and well being of the people of the United Kingdom, and Boris Johnson is an overbearing, dangerous clown, guided and controlled by Dominic Cummings whose plan is to destroy everything.

And if you think things are bad now, they’re going to be way more serious over the next couple of years, and an Eton education is indeed an extremely costly education in the art of gobbledegook, and Boris Johnson’s extravagant bombastic elaboration laces his idioms with merry distortion, with a barely hidden sneer that gives the game away.

And it’s not only when Boris Johnson makes a lengthy speech – he can’t seem to string a sentence together without it being full of um’s, ha, wuf and baah, making him sound like he’s got Tourettes Syndrome than anything else, and I deeply apologise to anyone who has Tourettes Syndrome for making that analogy.

And if the government’s record on COVID 19 and track and trace is anything to go by we’ll probably get a vaccine that doesn’t work, well after the rest of Europe has been completely vaccinated.

DWP To Give Private Firms Millions As Fit-For-Work Test Deals Extended For The Third Time

The government is set to give millions of pounds more to outsourcing colossi to run fit for work and disability examinations.

Atos, Capita and Maximus are due to have their profitable contracts for PIP and ESA assessments increased for up to two years, and it will be the third time the contracts have been extended without going out to tender.

That’s despite more than 450,000 sick and disabled people winning challenges against their assessment since 2013, and in the first three months of 2020, 17,598 people who were denied PIP or ESA had the test result reversed at a tribunal.

Three-quarters of all ESA and PIP tribunal claims overthrow the government, and contracts were originally due to last four years, but the latest extension suggests they will last about a decade.

This means that private firms will have taken hundreds of millions of pounds between them in extra government money, without having to compete for renewal through conventional rivals.

Previous extensions were awarded to July 2021 because the government wanted continuity while it changed the system, but ministers are now proposing another expansion to July 2023, after those reforms were suspended due to coronavirus.

Postponing procurement is an understandable decision, but it’s vital Government use the additional time to bring forward a green paper that will address the important weaknesses of our welfare system.

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a constant, severe and disabling illness and welfare assessments like personal independence payments just don’t reflect the realities of living with the condition, and a survey uncovered that more than half of the people with MS didn’t feel their assessor understood their MS.

Atos delivers the preponderance of PIP assessments under the signature Independent Assessment Services (IAS) through a contract it’s held since 2013. Capita also has a PIP assessments contract.

The Atos and Capita contracts were first extended from July 2017 to 31 July 2019. They were then extended a second time to July 2021, and a third extension could take them up to 31 July 2023.

Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) has been delivered since October 2014 by a firm called The Centre for Health and Disability Assessments Limited (CHDA), whose parent company is US outsourcing colossus Maximus.

CHDA previously had its contract, scheduled to terminate on 28 February 2018, extended to 29 February 2020.

It was then extended again for a further 16 months to July 2021 and the third extension could take it up to 31 July 2023. The latest extension was announced by Minister for Disabled People Justin Tomlinson.

He maintained he was still committed to reforms including a single, integrated health assessment service on a digital platform, but he stated that owing to COVID 19, they had to examine their commercial strategy.

And that the impact of COVID 19 meant that it wasn’t possible to launch procurement for new contracts at the moment, even though they realised that their claimants needed to have a reliable and stable service.

And he said that his department planned to examine options to prolong the prevailing contracts for up to 2 years, which would ensure the continuation of services when the current contracts end on 31 July 2021.

And that they would continue to evaluate those extensions to ensure they only continue for the time they needed to effectively respond to the consequences of COVID 19, and that the extension period would give time to thoroughly understand and assess the impacts of COVID 19 on those crucial services, ahead of anticipated procurements.

While private firms run the assessments, the DWP decides on whether to accept someone for PIP or ESA, and the CHDA and IAS previously stated that they’ve made continuous enhancements to assessments.

Face to face PIP and ESA assessments were postponed in March due to the coronavirus pandemic – that respite remains in place but some activity is set to slowly return, and assessments are being carried out using paperwork or over the telephone.

But these assessment tests are extremely discriminatory to countless people who are just unable to work.

They make judgments based on ludicrous physical tests which have no relation to the persons capacity to work, and people who have infirmities with no visible physical disability are even less inclined to be given a fair assessment.

The decision should be left to the persons GP, who would have a much greater perception of that person’s health and their history, but welcome to Orwellian Britain!

None of these companies should be permitted to conduct the assessments as they all employ unqualified people.

A person with complicated neurological problems arising from a traumatic brain injury could get assessed by a social worker with a first-aid certificate. And you might be persuaded that the person doing the assessing is qualified but once you’ve done a little digging, you’ll find out that it’s a massive sham, and that person’s judgment could leave you with no money for weeks if not months.

The entire process needs to be taken out of private hands and put back in the hands of the NHS so nobody has to fight against decisions made by the uneducated who get ill-gotten gains for each person they strip of their benefits.

These assessors aren’t sufficiently qualified, and most of them don’t have the slightest notion of how the person’s disability impacts on their life.

The only qualification anyone needs to work for these companies is their own in house certification which has no bearing on their skill, or lack of skill, in any area of medicine, but some people have been incredibly lucky, but there’s a number of extremely ill and sick people who have died because they’ve had their benefits terminated.

What Huawei 5G Ban Means

0_Huawei-sign-is-seen-on-its-store-near-a-traffic-light-in-Beijing.jpg

Boris Johnson ordered Huawei equipment to be removed from Britain’s 5G network by 2027, and he stated that the acquisition of Huawei 5G kit would be banned by the end of the year.

The move was announced in parliament by culture minister Oliver Dowden, who stated the imposition of new sanctions by the United States significantly altered the assessment of Britain’s National Cyber Security Centre, who couldn’t ensure the safety of future Huawei 5G equipment.

But what will this all mean? Will it mean that Huawei phones will stop working? And will they still be safe to use?

In May, the US issued a sanction barring US software and technology firms from working with Huawei. This also blocks Huawei chips from being made using US technology, or even inside a facility that uses US technology.

This means that the firm needs to make major adjustments to how it designs and builds its hardware, which comprises network equipment.

In January, the National Cyber Security Centre determined it was okay for Huawei to have a restricted roll in the rollout of new 5G networks, but changed their minds because of the new sanction, and because they could no longer work with US technology, and they no longer thought that the United Kingdom would be able to manage the security risks of using Huawei technology.

What does this mean for Huawei phones and laptops? Well, nothing. The embargo only pertains to network infrastructure, the equipment that runs internet and phone signals, and Huawei phones, tablets and laptops will still be on sale to the public as they were before.

Huawei devices will still continue to work as they do now. The only difference will be as a consequence of US sanctions and Google apps and the Google Play store is that they will no longer be available to use on new Huawei phones, but if they’re already on your device, they won’t disappear.

And beyond basic security updates, you won’t be able to get any new versions of Google’s Android operating system.

As far as overall security is concerned, the decision and cybersecurity advice doesn’t apply to consumer goods, only to infrastructure, and officials have stressed consumer devices present minimal security risks.

5G is the newest and fastest type of mobile internet connection. It’s about ten times quicker than 4G and more stable as well.

The government believes it can be used to improve mobile internet capability across the United Kingdom, enabling more people to get online without the network lagging, and the plan is that over time more people will use mobile internet instead of wired connections to their homes, which will allow faster speeds for people in remote areas.

Full fibre broadband operators are further being encouraged to transition away from using Huawei kit in their networks. They won’t be expected to stop purchasing Huawei kit straight away because there are currently only two firms making such hardware, Huawei and Nokia.

Having only one supplier available to make components for your whole network is just as precarious as continuing to use Huawei components, but 4G is perfectly satisfactory and 5G is about making money.

5G isn’t actually that important right now, but the decision to ban Huawei is certainly politically motivated and giving Boris Johnson an ultimatum that he had to get rid of Huawei or no trade deal and Boris Johnson simply rolled over and has lost little respect, and this is just the start of things to come with Boris Johnson bending over to satisfy Donald Trump.

But then we had all the lefties whining that 5G wasn’t safe, and telling us that 5G was responsible for the coronavirus, and how it would microwave us, and how dangerous it was to allow Chinese technology into the United Kingdom – now look at everybody, this is far too entertaining.

We’re leaving the EU but we’re still being told what to do and it seems that our government is Donald Trump’s lackey.

Oh dear, the US leaders and tyrants have inflicted their will upon the United Kingdom and Global Britain and now it seems we must toe the line, and when a big country changes its rules and the little country has to alter its policies – beware Brexiters because big fish eat little fish, and when America and the EU gesundheit the UK will catch a cold – take back control, you’re having a giggle.

This is just plain nonsense from the USA and Boris Johnson, and everyone in defence knows that IP addresses are monitored and are quickly barred. Perhaps the UK doesn’t want to pay to have IPs monitored? Or they simply don’t want people to know that they can stop China or any government spying on you.

Although, the Chinese are extremely robust and they act on their own terms with impunity as we have observed when they kept important coronavirus information while it spread globally.

And how can Huawei be imputed when Google hands over data to the American government on demand and so does Facebook, but of course, the American government want the United Kingdom to become an American state.

It’s so evident that Boris Johnson is saying yes to whatever Donald Trump wants, crippling the UK’s interest along the way, and for goodness sake, there are parts of the United Kingdom that get no phone signal at all, never mind 5G and they need to sort out the basics before attempting to leap forward.

And it now seems that America says jump and our government ask how high.

Dominic Cummings Aims To Rip The Heart Out Of Army Air Corps

Dominic Cummings intends to rip the heart out of the Army Corps.

The 2,000 famous blue berets operate the MoD’s armada of 200 Apache and Gazelle helicopters providing battlefield surveillance, medevac and air support to ground troops, but now Dominic Cummings intends to close their training HQ in Middle Wallop, Hants to save cash.

Middle Wallop is the heart of the Army Air Corps and every organisation needs a heart, and it would be a true disgrace to close it.

The base is officially named the Army Aviation Centre and Prince Harry received his flying wings there, and AAC’s pilots are amongst the most experienced aviators they have, and anyone who visits Middle Wallop gets an immediate perception of the important purpose it plays.

The AAC has fought in all hostilities Britain has been involved in since its 1957 creation, but insiders say Boris Johnson’s top aide has it in his sights as he prepares to cut billions from our defence.

Dominic Cummings, who ridiculed lockdown by driving from London to Durham, is now undertaking a fact-finding tour of military bases including special forces HQs.

Chief of Defence Staff General Sir Nick Carter was warned by Tory MP Mark Francois of the Commons Defence Committee to tell the MoD to sort their bloody selves out.

The MP added that if not, then Dominic Cummings would sort them out in his own way, and they wouldn’t like it.

And Shadow Defence Secretary John Healey said plans for Britain’s future defence and security shouldn’t be in the hands of a political adviser.

Any decisions about the Forces should be taken by ministers and military leaders, and it wasn’t known if Middle Wallop was the only one of four ACC bases under threat or part of more extensive changes, but No 10 said the Integrated Review, which covers defence, will include all aspects of the UK’s place in the world.

But if Dominic Cummings is becoming the narrative once again, he should then go, and why is this unelected advisor deciding to cull our defences?

And now we seem to be going it alone in the world with our politicians throwing their weight around with diminishing back up. Remember David Cameron, he shut down the Harrier jump jets and flogged them off cheap – so is Dominic Cummings working for or against the people of the United Kingdom?

He’s not just content with destroying our economy and putting our political influence in the world on the same level as Easter Island, he also wants to decrease our ability to protect ourselves.

And it seems he will only be happy when the army is equipped with popguns and the navy consists of a trawler armed to the teeth with catapults, and Vladimir Putin must love him because this guy seems to be the enemy within.

And there was us thinking that Dominic Cummings didn’t have any power, didn’t make any decisions for the government and didn’t tell Boris Johnson what to do, yet he’s picking up his £100,000 plus taxpayer-funded salary for doing zilch.

Dominic Cummings isn’t an MP he’s an unelected tyrant with no public mandate but seems to be running the country, but wasn’t the whole purpose of Brexit to get rid of unelected bureaucrats deciding what the UK government does?

So, now it’s official, the receding oddity Dominic Cummings is the unelected PM, whilst slothful goon Boris Johnson is now the monkey, and just because the MoD has imperfections in its administration, this won’t be resolved by cutting necessary front line world-class forces.

Our defence is underfunded and the world is getting more dangerous, with other influential countries strengthening their forces.

We need to purchase more British equipment and spend the defence money efficiently, but this is a government problem and it’s folly to realise profits in a simple way by slaughtering a central base and the skills and training that is world-class, and when lost, they can’t be brought back at a time they wished they had them.

Defence of the nation is the single most important job next to the health of the country, but then everything is underfunded in the United Kingdom by our government – you just have to look at the police and the NHS to see that.

Thankfully the United Kingdom isn’t involved in a conflict with anyone at the moment, but if we were, we’d probably get our bums beaten due to underfunding and continuous cuts to government investment into our military.

It also results in not being ready when the worst happens, a bit like cutting the NHS to the bone and then being shocked the pandemic overwhelmed the provision.

Dominic Cummings is pretty much flameproof now, although how can he do this? He’s not been elected, so how much power does he hold? And what intrigues does he hold over Boris Johnson?

Shamima Begum and Boris Johnson Both Violated The Law

fleet street.png

When she ran away to join an Islamic State in 2015, Shamima Begum violated the law.

A year earlier, then Home Secretary Theresa May had applied powers under section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000, to make the death cult a proscribed organisation, and having anything to do with the group was punishable by up to 10 years in jail or a fine, and Shamima Begum, by all accounts was an intelligent girl and knew what she was doing.

But when Boris Johnson decided to impose Chris Grayling as chairman of Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee, he was in violation of section 1 (6) of the Justice and Security Act 2013, which says it’s not up to him, and he knew what he was doing as well.

There were uncorroborated reports of what Shamima Begum did during her time in Syria, good and bad.

All we know for sure is that at the age of 15 years old, she married a 23-year-old Dutch convert in a ceremony that would not be accepted as legitimate in Dutch or British law.

Ten days later, he was imprisoned by ISIS as a spy, but after his release, Shamima Begum had 3 children. Her first died of malnutrition, and a third of pneumonia in a refugee camp.

When Shamima Begum left the United Kingdom, police said she’d committed no crimes and would not be treated as a subversive, but after ISIS collapsed, the government stripped her of British citizenship under the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, on the grounds she was not conducive to the public good.

That same law says a British citizen must not be declared stateless unless there are just grounds for believing that another country could take them, which was in this instance, her parent’s home country of Bangladesh, which was a place she’d never been.

Pregnant Shamima Begum was found by a media outlet and her first-ever interview was printed on February 13, 2019.

She said she didn’t regret her actions, and that seeing a severed head didn’t faze her at all, but that by the end she just couldn’t take any more, and all she wanted to do was to come home to Britain.

A day later Sajid Javid announced to the media that he’d stripped her of citizenship, but he didn’t sign the paperwork until later on, but when Shamima Begum gave birth to her third child, that child had automatic British citizenship, and two days after that, Bangladesh said she wouldn’t be permitted to enter the country.

Both factors meant, under the law, Shamima Begum must have her citizenship returned and it was not, and Sajid Javid told the Home Office Affairs Select Committee he would never remove citizenship if it made someone stateless.

He said that he hadn’t done that and he wasn’t knowledgeable that one of his predecessors had done that in a case where they knew a person only has one citizenship, as that would be violating international law.

A year later, Shamima Begum lost a bid to return to the United Kingdom and argue the case, but the ruling was overthrown by the Court of Appeal, but the Home Office has stated it will counter appeal, and that it may end up in the Supreme Court, in a year or more’s time.

In the 5 years since she joined ISIS, there’s been no obvious proof that Shamima Begum violated any other laws.

Shamima Begum was born in England and she was radicalised here and failed by our police and government and she is our responsibility, and when a friend of hers joined ISIS, Shamima Begum was questioned by counter-terrorism police without the knowledge of her parents, and according to the lawyers for the family, she was not referred to the Prevent anti-terror scheme, but both were criminal.

Parliament was told that when she left for Syria, it took 2 days for the Foreign Office to notify the Turkish government, by way of an overnight email.

It was 3 days before police arranged a BBC appeal, and four days for the information to be given to Interpol.

Several weeks later, evidence surfaced a Canadian man had helped the girls across into Syria, but because she was deemed a minor and a victim of international trafficking, grooming, and forced marriage, Shamima Begum should have been protected by international law, the United Nations, and the UK government.

In legislation written by the Coalition in 2014, Shamima Begum was a victim of child abuse and had a claim to lifelong anonymity, and whoever trafficked or coerced her into marriage overseas can be tried and imprisoned in the United Kingdom.

But it’s still reported the Foreign Office will spend no attempt to bring her home, although none of this means shes innocent. She’s blameworthy of at least one pretty serious wrong, but she appears to have done little damage with it.

Shamima Begum’s story is not of a glorious jihadi, but a pitiful follower, and she’s the antithesis of an advert for ISIS, and it’s a bit like crashing your car into a tree, failing to die, and then being charged with dangerous driving, and you have to question if it’s deserving of the paperwork.

Boris Johnson wasn’t born in England, but in New York and in the years since, the USA has allowed many thousands of its children to be slain by guns, and its citizens being drugged by CIA funded crack cocaine, and its people terrorised by white supremacists.

Boris Johnson didn’t relinquish his US citizenship until he was 52, but then, being American isn’t a felony, although last year, the Supreme Court ruled Boris Johnson wasn’t conducive to anything good either.

His determination to prorogue Parliament broke the law because it had the effect of preventing or hindering the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional duties.

Closing Parliament destroyed the lives and freedoms of 66 million people. The Supreme Court reinstated them quickly, but Boris Johnson’s acknowledgement that he deeply opposed damage trust and support for the judiciary, which superintends more than 2 million criminal and civil cases every year.

And his persistent bigotry, misogyny and other hate speech have never reached the threshold for prosecution because closing Parliament isn’t a violation, neither is breaking the Highway Code, delaying the Russia report, hunting headlines, lying to journalists, banishing someone to an unfamiliar land, imposing a committee chairman or misleading Parliament.

But they’re all extremely damaging to this country, and against our basic democratic values, and it’s extremely doubtful that the Secretary of State will be penalised for illegally stripping someone of citizenship for political reasons, or refusing to bring home a British victim of child molestation.

Politics and terrorism should be a long way apart, and it shouldn’t be possible to draw similarities between them. Yet here we have two people, who qualified for and lost citizenship in various ways, both of whom broke the rules.

One is being punished with severity greater than the harm she’s done, and the other isn’t being punished at all, and no matter how severe or insignificant the crimes are, if breaking the law carries no punishment, then there’s no law.

Shamima Begum should be returned to the United Kingdom and tried for the crimes she’s accused of perpetrating against us. Otherwise, what’s the point of outlawing ISIS? And the officials who allowed her to be groomed, trafficked and violated should face investigation, or they will make the same mistakes with other children.

And Boris Johnson, whose reach is far greater, and a listing of crimes far longer must be tried for his transgressions – for the 65,000 excess deaths, Parliamentary gerrymandering, deceptions, perversions, and damage to the institutions which are what stand between us and fear.

And possibly more than anything else, he must be judged for telling a child rape victim that she can find her own way home, so if she’s guilty, then so is he.

And Sir Keir Starmer needs to make a statement on his position on this. Does he support the Government in stopping her coming back, or not?

But it’s not about whether Boris Johnson should have supported Shamima Begum returning or not, he broke the law when he did what he did, and now he’s having to pay the price for her possible return – had he done what the law stated, she could have been removed from Britain legally and not permitted to return, but now he will wait to see which way the wind blows before he says anything on the matter.

It would be pleasing to believe that the people of the United Kingdom are understanding and liberally inclined, however, when it comes to Shamima Begum, words tend to fail me because she has on the numerous occasions that she’s been interviewed, failed to show one ounce of empathy for the innocent victims who were savagely butchered by the despicable cult she supported, and would presumably still be supporting had they not been defeated.

However, she was a British citizen at the time, and perhaps rather than extraditing her to another country, this government should have put her on trial, however, they couldn’t because she’d done nothing wrong, aside from supporting a vile faction.

There were tens of thousands of children living under the control of ISIS – children they actively recruited as their next crop of soldiers.

They teach them how to load and strip guns and how to be in the shooting position, and boys as young as 14 years old joined ISIS after they convinced them they were true Muslims. Children would then give everything to Islamic State’s victory because they believed it was being oppressed by everyone, and they told these children that they should give everything to them, and even sacrifice themselves.

And boys who’ve undergone ISIS training said that they’re also being shown something much more dangerous, and that in the religious military camps you learn something called listening and obeying, and that you must listen and obey even if you have to die.

ISIS called these children cubs of the caliphate, and children were being systematically recruited across ISIS.

It’s really difficult but the principal intention is to produce a new army of unquestioning, and what ISIS considers, ideologically pure fighters, and they’re making a new generation for the Caliphate to fight infidels, and there are countless children who had complete loyalty.

It’s that loyalty that ISIS was utilising for another horrifying purpose, and it began with showing children videos of suicide attacks. The scenes were repeated again and again, and when the child saw them, he then thought he wanted to do the same as them, so that they would go to ISIS and say they wanted to become a suicide bomber.

The youngest boy who wanted to be a suicide bomber was eight years old, just a child, and because he was a child, you would never be able to convince him to give up his beliefs.

But convincing young children to sacrifice their lives without issue needed intense brainwashing, and there were teachers who prepared girls as young as 10 years old for suicide attacks.

They pushed them into jihad and told these girls that they would all die martyrs and reach Heaven, all of them and that it was written in the Quran that they had to fight jihad, and they all had to join jihad for the sake of God and the Islamic State.

But that the most crucial thing to make them understand is that President Bashar’s state was infidel and that everyone should fight them, and that was God’s word, essentially indoctrinating children.

Children were trained to spy on their parents, who risked death if they objected to their children joining ISIS, and boys were routinely gathered in town squares, where they were given money and food to join ISIS and fed anti-western tirades.

And when they gathered the children, they would say for them to come and fight jihad in the name of God and they would enter Heaven. They said that they would enjoy it and that they would give them many things, and countless children followed.

The boys were made to assemble in front of large screens and made to watch videos of ISIS cruelty and propaganda movies, and they showed them how to kill President Bashar’s soldiers – sometimes they tried not to watch, but when they did watch they were frightened, and they were ordered to watch actual executions too.

But perhaps most disturbingly of all, ISIS released videos showing beheadings being carried out by boys themselves, and boys were told they would be executed if they didn’t join ISIS by 16.

But death was not the only punishment for refusing to join ISIS. ISIS fighters would capture young children and torture them into forcing them to join.

They would string them up and torture them for a month and a half, saying, why don’t they pledge allegiance to Islamic State? Why don’t you fight against the non-Muslims with us? Yet they were slaughtering Muslims.

Some refused to join and they were condemned to a horrifying punishment. Where they would gather people, fasten their hand and leg and put their hand on a wooden block and cut off their hand with a butcher’s knife, then cut off the foot and put them in front of them to see, and the price of resistance was consistent pain and depression.

Thousands of children have been born or raised in the Islamic State, and now the world’s governments have to decide how and whether to reintegrate them into their societies and as the militants retain only a small sliver of territory in Syria, Western countries are being compelled to grapple with how to deal with children who qualify for citizenship through their parents, including foreign fighters who carried out atrocities overseas.

And the plea from the British ISIS bride to return to the United Kingdom with her infant son demonstrates that problem.

British teenagers Kadiza Sultana, Amira Abase and Shamima Begum passed through the security barriers at Gatwick Airport near London as they began their mission to Syria in 2015 – Shamima Begum was age 15 at the time.

Her child is innocent and has every right to grow up in the peace and safety of this homeland, and while it’s not clear how far Shamima Begum’s association with ISIS went, she’s been cited as saying that she had no regrets about moving to Syria, and such remarks have triggered a debate in Britain about whether Shamima Begum could or should be rehabilitated back into society.

But under international law, countries are bound to allow their nationals to return home. However, European countries have been unwilling to take back homegrown fighters, and their families believe they’re safer outside of Europe.

Britain has even gone so far as to revoke the citizenship of more than 100 ISIS soldiers who had dual nationality, and minister Sajid Javid wrote in an opinion piece that while he felt compassion for any child born or brought into a battle zone, when analysing the repatriation of their parents who joined the Islamic State he had to consider the safety and security of children living in the United Kingdom.

But saying that, any country which chooses to penalise children for the misdeeds of their parents will be haunted by that choice in years to come, and it could be regarded as shortsightedness by governments because you can’t just leave small children in the desert, in the wilderness because they’re going to grow to be wild or feel the need or urge to exact retribution.

Only Russia has so far repatriated any children of Islamic State fighters. The children were aged between 4 and 13 years old.

The government have a legal and moral duty to help these children reintegrate, it’s not their fault that their fathers were murderers and their mothers were participants in the Islamic State.

And President Donald Trump had called on European countries to take back the captured ISIS fighters or risk them being released. He was also asking Britain, France, Germany and other European allies to take back over 800 ISIS fighters that were captured in Syria and to put them on trial.

France stated it would repatriate ISIS fighters on a case by case basis and Germany said that while citizens have the right to return home, it was difficult for the government to estimate how many German citizens had really been affected.

ISIS recruits who wanted to return home to the United Kingdom would have to go to a British Consulate in Iraq or Turkey and the same would apply for their children.

Couples living in the caliphate were urged to marry young and to have as many children as possible so the next generation could continue to carry the jihad banner, and countless ISIS fighters also married more than one woman.

Children would be forced to watch and participate in the execution of ISIS prisoners, and the motto of ISIS was that these children were never too young to start thinking about jihad and brainwashing children into violence was very much part of their ethos.

An ISIS math textbook that was acquired by a media outlet showing images of guns, bullets and tanks to better demonstrate basic math, while an English language workbook used drawings of bombs to teach them how to read the time and the working premise should be that the children of ISIS-linked parents are both vulnerable and dangerous.

Risk assessments would be needed on a case by case basis, with those closest to the age of 18 being more able of posing a substantial threat because some of these children have received bomb training.

This is what you call real child abuse, and this is a doctrine that makes innocent and adorable children into revolutionaries, and this is particularly disturbing because innocents are beautiful and we were all children once, so how can anyone do this to a child?

These are underprivileged children that ISIS turn into monsters, and indoctrination is the worst crime, not only for their victims but also for those around the victims and society.

And in a typical primary school, a pupil would learn A is for apple but children who have been brainwashed by ISIS, these children learn that A is for AK47, and many of these children will never see their adulthood, get married, leave home or even have children.

But this is a very difficult thing to reverse, although it is quite possible and those children could end up using their ability to help better the world. But if we do start to accept refugees, we need to start vetting people again.

Do Americans even vet Americans anymore? The thing is we’re creating terrorism everywhere, and America has been way worse than what other countries have been in recent years.

We keep reacting on hate, and then all we do is promote even more hate, and we’re starting to lose control of everything, but we have to help people if we can because real strength comes from striving for what’s right, and it’s right to help guide children to a better path.

These poor inexperienced children suffer from idiots because children think it’s a game, they don’t know it’s war.

Religion is the creation of spirituality into something that became the handmaiden of champions, and almost all religions were brought to people and forced on people by conquerors and used as the frame to dominate their thoughts.

But now religion is viewed by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as beneficial.

But now men can’t seem to take on armies, they would rather put their children into combat because they’re so desperate for a win they would rather endanger their children’s lives.

Brainwashing sticks to these children’s brains like superglue and might be difficult to remove, but ordinary people across the globe are being indoctrinated by media organisations, and they use everything to brainwash you, lyrics, songs, adverts and countless more.

Who are the real victims? And I’m not condoning or supporting ISIS for their actions, I’m simply wondering where all this hatred came from.

Remember these children didn’t all join the Islamic State, many of them were violated into doing so, and it now seems that humanity is the plague.

But just bear in mind that ISIS is ISIS and Islam is something entirely separate, and not all Muslims are ISIS. However, there are millions of communities, cultures and ethnicity in the world, all created by the human brain, seeking to demonstrate their point.

And as humans, we love the Game which has given birth to religions, and religion is a virus or a blessing and it all runs on how you want to believe it – sadly, there’s no reversing what happened to these children.

Confusion As Michael Gove Says …

Face masks shouldn’t be made compulsory in England’s shops, that’s what Michael Gove said, but now Boris Johnson has now toughened up the rules on coverings and has made face coverings mandatory.

There are some people out there that chose to wear face coverings, there are others that don’t and there are many that can’t because of disabilities – perhaps we should just use common sense, which most people have been doing.

Although there has been some indication that face coverings reduce the spread of COVID 19 indoors, and now the United Kingdom and Scotland have made them mandatory in shops.

And they seem to prevent people from producing as many droplets when they breathe and talk, which supposedly could remain airborne for an hour without proper ventilation, but the Cabinet Office Minister appears to have guilt-tripped the public into wearing face coverings in stores, saying that it was basic good manners, respect and courtesy to wear a face mask in shops.

But he seemed to rule out making them compulsory, maintaining that it was always better to trust people’s common sense, and mixed messages from the government on this and is propagating uncertainty.

Society as a whole has overwhelmingly been doing the right thing, although there have been some that have been flouting the rules, so some manageable direction would be good for some people to comprehend, however, this inept government are precariously muddling messages.

The government should be encouraging people to wear face masks when they’re inside an environment where they’re likely to be mixing with others and where the ventilation may not be good, but on the whole, it’s best to trust people’s common sense.

Of course, the government should keep the policy under review and should be encouraging people to wear coverings in shops, rather than enforcing it, and there have been numerous people saying that if they have to wear them, they simply won’t go out – just another way to dampen the economy.

And it’s quite right that the government should treat the British people with the respect that their intelligence and their judgement deserves.

And if people can get to work by using other means, they should, such as walking or cycling, but sometimes public transport is the only way people can get to work, and of course, people should use public transport safely.

But again there’s this confounded confusion, and the people of this country now appear to be an inconvenience whilst the government fill their pockets. So do we don a mask as Boris Johnson said, or do we not wear one as Michael Gove said?

Do people go back to work? Because they are numerous government offices that have not reopened their doors to the public and have not gone back to work, so why should joe public go back to work?

Does the public go on holiday to Greece like Boris Johnson’s father has or do we simply accept that the holidays that we booked last December has been cancelled as travel between the United Kingdom and Greece has been forbidden by both countries?

And the price of masks will be increasing because remember this is Rip off Britain, and no doubt some Tory contributor will be making loads of money out of this disaster, and of course, there will be people out there that won’t want to listen to this shambolic, inadequate and immoral government anymore, and they’ll just do what they want and do the reverse and go with their gut instinct.

It looks like Michael Gove is repudiating his own Prime Minister who he’s the cabinet of, but they’re supposed to have a discussion they agree on before they commence handing out Government statements, and this government is a shambles.

And these MPs who are criticising must believe that the preponderance of the population are morons, when the central message to people here should be careful reflection and common sense.

The thing is with social distancing there are now long queues outside shops and supermarkets, and sometimes we just want to pop in and purchase a singular item, but end up spending more. Now, more people will put that on hold, so profits will hit and will continue to do so whilst all this madness plays out.

Of course, the pandemic isn’t nonsense, it’s real, and it’s happening right now and it’s deadly, and no country in the world actually knows how to best deal with it, and it could be said that the Tories don’t know what they’re doing, but they do.

That’s not to say that they’re not incompetent, they are because they’re seeking profit above all else and if that means planting confusion, chaos and destruction, then as far as the Tories are concerned, so be it.

This government can’t tell everyone to get back to work so that they can restart the city centres, and then make masks compulsory because people will just not bother going out, and it should be a person’s decision, not that of politicians who have turned the world upside down without the mandate to do so, and our government seems to speak with many forked tongues.

Boris Johnson said that he was going to make face masks compulsory when shopping – Michael Gove said that they’re not going to make them compulsory when shopping and that it was down to people to use their common sense, although it was good manners to wear one when out and about – this government clearly don’t have an ounce of common sense between them.

Clearly, our Prime Minister doesn’t actually talk to his cabinet, and clearly, the cabinet and Prime Minister don’t even know what one another have said to the public on a day to day basis.

No wonder the people of Great Britain are totally stumped as to what they can and can’t do, and maybe there should be a crowd mantra at our inept Prime Minister ‘You don’t know what you’re doing’ as they stroll past Downing Street.

At the end of the day, we simply need one representative who delivers the changes because at the moment it’s like doing the hokey pokey – you put your left leg in, put your right leg in, and then fall on your bum.

Then we have the exorbitant cost of face masks – four months ago they would have been between £5.00-7.99 for a pack of washable and reusable masks at the chemist, but after Boris Johnson said they had become mandatory they have now multiplied.

But this is all a load of bunkum anyhow. The World Health Organisation (WHO) said that even if everyone wore a mask, they can only reduce the spread of the virus by about 5 per cent, as the virus can penetrate the body via any mucus membrane and a mask doesn’t cover your eyes.

I guess 5 per cent is better than 0 per cent, but then why introduce it now and not 4 months ago? That’s a bit like closing the stable door after the horse has bolted, and there appear to be too many people losing their jobs and too many MPs keeping theirs.

And politicians in this country seem to be terrified of making decisions, particularly if they don’t think they’ll be popular with the electorate when they should be studying the bigger picture and doing what’s needed to protect the people.

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this: